From Nursing Home to Hospital and Back Are We Finally Fixing the Revolving Door
Abstract
The movement of nursing home residents between long term care facilities and acute care hospitals has become a persistent challenge in geriatric medicine and health systems management. This repeated cycle of transfer, often described as a revolving door effect, reflects the frequent hospitalization of frail older adults for conditions that may in many cases be preventable, manageable within the nursing home setting, or better addressed through earlier clinical intervention. For residents, these transitions are associated with substantial physical, psychological, and functional consequences, including delirium, deconditioning, medication disruption, exposure to hospital acquired infections, and increased mortality risk. For healthcare systems, they contribute to escalating expenditures, resource strain, and fragmentation of care. For long term care facilities, frequent transfers often signal deeper structural issues involving staffing limitations, delayed clinical recognition, inadequate access to diagnostics, and gaps in communication across care settings.
Unnecessary hospital transfers remain particularly concerning because many are triggered by conditions such as urinary tract infections, dehydration, pneumonia, heart failure exacerbations, falls, and medication related complications, all of which may potentially be stabilized or managed within the nursing home when adequate clinical resources are available. Yet decision making in long term care frequently occurs in environments where on site physician availability is limited, nursing workloads are high, and access to urgent diagnostics is restricted. In these circumstances, transfer to hospital often becomes the default response to uncertainty, liability concerns, family expectations, or deterioration that might otherwise have been identified earlier.
This paper examines current efforts aimed at reducing avoidable hospital transfers from nursing homes and evaluates whether recent interventions are producing meaningful improvements in resident outcomes and system performance. Drawing on recent clinical research, health policy reforms, and implementation studies, the review analyzes the principal factors that continue to drive hospital transfer decisions, including clinical instability, staffing patterns, communication failures, regulatory pressures, and limitations in advance care planning.
A major focus of current intervention strategies involves expanding access to remote clinical expertise through telehealth. Telemedicine programs now allow nursing staff to connect with physicians, geriatricians, or acute care specialists in real time, supporting rapid assessment of acute symptoms and facilitating treatment decisions without immediate hospital referral. Evidence from recent studies suggests that telehealth can reduce emergency department visits, improve clinical confidence among nursing staff, and support earlier intervention for common acute conditions, particularly during nights and weekends when on site physician access is limited.
Another important development has been the integration of advanced practice providers, including nurse practitioners and physician assistants, into long term care settings. Facilities that maintain regular advanced practitioner presence often demonstrate lower hospitalization rates because residents receive earlier evaluation, more timely medication adjustments, and closer monitoring of evolving symptoms. These practitioners also play a critical role in coordinating care plans, guiding palliative discussions, and supporting staff education, all of which contribute to more stable management within the facility.
Medication management systems have also emerged as a central strategy in reducing transfers. Polypharmacy remains highly prevalent among nursing home residents and is strongly associated with falls, confusion, hypotension, renal dysfunction, and other complications that frequently precipitate hospitalization. Structured medication review programs led by pharmacists, combined with deprescribing protocols and electronic prescribing surveillance, have shown promise in identifying high risk medication combinations and reducing adverse drug events.
Quality improvement initiatives have further targeted system level contributors to unnecessary transfers. Programs focused on early warning tools, standardized clinical pathways, staff training in acute change recognition, and improved communication with emergency services have demonstrated measurable benefits in some settings. The use of structured tools such as SBAR communication frameworks and early deterioration scoring systems can improve decision making and reduce avoidable escalation to hospital care.
Policy level changes have also influenced transfer patterns. Payment reforms that incentivize reduced hospital readmissions, alongside regulatory attention to quality indicators in long term care, have encouraged facilities to invest in preventive care infrastructure. At the same time, these reforms have highlighted disparities between facilities with robust clinical resources and those operating under workforce shortages or financial constraints.
Despite these advances, many barriers continue to limit sustained success. Staffing shortages remain one of the most important challenges, particularly in facilities with limited registered nurse coverage or high staff turnover. Family expectations may also influence transfer decisions, especially when communication regarding prognosis and goals of care has been insufficient. In addition, not all facilities have equal access to telehealth infrastructure, advanced practitioners, or rapid diagnostics, creating uneven implementation across regions and care systems.
The evidence overall suggests that progress has been made in reducing unnecessary transfers, but the cycle has not been fully broken. Successful reduction requires not a single intervention but a coordinated model that combines clinical expertise, early detection systems, medication optimization, communication improvement, and resident centered advance care planning. Future progress will depend on strengthening workforce capacity, expanding equitable access to supportive technologies, and embedding hospital avoidance strategies into routine long term care practice.
Ultimately, reducing the revolving door effect between nursing homes and hospitals is not only a matter of cost containment but also a fundamental issue of preserving dignity, continuity, and quality of life for one of the most medically vulnerable populations in healthcare.
Introduction
Hospital transfers among nursing home residents remain one of the most persistent challenges in long term care medicine, reflecting a complex intersection of clinical vulnerability, system inefficiency, and fragmented care delivery. Older adults living in nursing homes are hospitalized at rates substantially higher than their counterparts residing in the community, largely because they often present with multiple chronic illnesses, advanced frailty, cognitive impairment, and reduced physiological reserve. Current evidence indicates that approximately one quarter of nursing home residents experience at least one hospital admission each year, and a greater proportion of these transfers are considered potentially avoidable when timely assessment, treatment, or monitoring could have been provided within the nursing facility itself.
The clinical consequences of these transfers are substantial. Movement between nursing homes and acute care hospitals frequently disrupts continuity of care, exposes residents to unfamiliar environments, and increases the likelihood of adverse events such as delirium, medication errors, hospital acquired infections, functional decline, and iatrogenic complications. For residents with dementia or other forms of cognitive impairment, transfer to an acute care setting may also precipitate behavioral deterioration and prolonged recovery. In many cases, hospitalization does not result in meaningful improvement in quality of life or long term clinical outcomes, particularly for residents with advanced illness or limited physiological reserve.
The impact extends beyond the individual resident. Recurrent transfers place considerable strain on emergency departments, where older nursing home residents often require complex evaluation, prolonged observation, and multidisciplinary coordination. Communication challenges frequently arise during these transitions, as essential information regarding baseline functional status, medication regimens, advance care plans, and recent clinical changes may not be fully transmitted between nursing home and hospital teams. These gaps increase the risk of duplicated testing, delayed decision making, and treatment plans that may not align with the resident’s established goals of care.
From a systems perspective, avoidable hospitalizations contribute significantly to rising healthcare expenditures. Emergency transport, hospital admission, diagnostic investigations, and post discharge care all add to the economic burden associated with long term care transitions. These costs are particularly concerning given that many hospital transfers are triggered by conditions such as urinary tract infections, dehydration, pneumonia, exacerbations of chronic heart failure, and minor injuries, all of which may be manageable within nursing facilities when appropriate clinical resources are available.
Families also experience considerable emotional and practical burden during repeated transitions between care settings. Frequent hospital transfers often generate uncertainty regarding prognosis, treatment priorities, and long term expectations. Family members may struggle to understand why hospitalization is occurring, whether it is necessary, and how decisions are being made, especially when communication across settings is inconsistent. This can lead to distress, reduced trust in care systems, and conflict regarding treatment goals, particularly in residents with advanced frailty or palliative care needs.
Although the problem has been recognized for decades, progress in reducing unnecessary transfers has historically been slow. Structural barriers such as limited on site diagnostic capability, inadequate staffing, delayed physician access, regulatory concerns, and risk aversion have often driven nursing homes to transfer residents to hospital even when in facility management might be feasible. In addition, reimbursement structures have not always supported enhanced clinical capacity within long term care environments.
In recent years, however, renewed attention has focused on improving transitional care for nursing home residents through policy reform, technological innovation, and new clinical care models. Expanded use of telemedicine, early warning systems, mobile diagnostic services, nurse practitioner led acute care programs, and structured transfer protocols have shown promise in reducing avoidable hospitalizations. Programs that strengthen advance care planning and improve communication regarding goals of care are also increasingly recognized as critical components of transfer reduction strategies. Policy initiatives aimed at incentivizing quality improvement in long term care settings have further accelerated efforts to manage acute illness within nursing homes whenever clinically appropriate.
This paper examines whether these emerging interventions are producing measurable improvements in reducing unnecessary hospital transfers and enhancing outcomes for nursing home residents. It evaluates current evidence on transfer patterns, identifies persistent barriers to in facility management, and explores whether recent healthcare reforms are sufficient to support a more coordinated, resident centered approach to acute care in long term care settings. Ultimately, improving transfer decisions requires not only better clinical tools but also a broader rethinking of how acute illness is managed in frail older adults whose care priorities often extend beyond disease treatment alone.
Background and Scope of the Problem
The relationship between nursing homes and hospitals has always been complex. Nursing homes care for residents with multiple chronic conditions, cognitive impairment, and functional limitations. When acute medical problems arise, the decision to transfer residents to hospitals often involves multiple factors beyond pure medical necessity.
Studies consistently show that many hospital transfers from nursing homes could be avoided with appropriate interventions at the nursing home level. Research estimates that between 30% and 67% of transfers are potentially avoidable. These transfers typically involve conditions that can be managed in the nursing home setting with proper resources, training, and support.
The most common reasons for transfer include respiratory infections, urinary tract infections, falls, medication-related problems, and changes in mental status. Many of these conditions can be treated effectively in nursing homes when staff have the proper training, equipment, and clinical support systems in place.
The consequences of unnecessary transfers extend to multiple areas. Residents face increased risk of hospital-acquired infections, delirium, functional decline, and medication errors. The stress of transfer often worsens underlying conditions, particularly in residents with dementia or other cognitive impairments.
From a systems perspective, these transfers create inefficiencies in both settings. Emergency departments spend resources evaluating patients who might be better served in their familiar nursing home environment. Nursing homes lose continuity of care and may struggle to manage residents upon their return.
Current Evidence on Transfer Reduction Strategies 
Advanced Practitioner Programs
One of the most studied approaches to reducing transfers involves placing advanced practitioners directly in nursing homes. Nurse practitioners and physician assistants can provide on-site evaluation and treatment for acute conditions that might otherwise require hospital transfer.
Recent studies have shown promising results from these programs. A 2022 study published in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society found that nursing homes with embedded nurse practitioners reduced hospital transfers by 35% compared to traditional models. The program also showed improvements in resident satisfaction and family confidence in care quality.
The success of advanced practitioner programs appears to depend on several factors. First, the practitioners must have geriatric training and experience managing complex medical conditions in frail older adults. Second, they need access to diagnostic tools and treatments that allow them to provide hospital-level care when appropriate. Third, clear protocols must exist for when transfer is truly necessary.
Telehealth and Remote Monitoring
Technology has opened new possibilities for providing expert medical care without physical transfer. Telehealth programs connect nursing home staff with physicians, specialists, and emergency medicine providers to evaluate residents and guide treatment decisions.
A randomized controlled trial published in 2023 examined the impact of 24-hour telehealth availability for nursing homes. Facilities with telehealth access reduced emergency department visits by 28% and showed improved management of common conditions like pneumonia and urinary tract infections.
The effectiveness of telehealth depends heavily on nursing home staff training and comfort with technology. Programs that include extensive staff education and ongoing support show better results than those that simply provide equipment without adequate preparation.
Remote monitoring systems that track vital signs, activity levels, and other health indicators are also showing promise. These systems can identify changes in resident condition before they become acute, allowing for earlier intervention and prevention of transfers.
Quality Improvement and Care Coordination Programs
Several quality improvement initiatives have focused specifically on reducing unnecessary transfers. The INTERACT program (Interventions to Reduce Acute Care Transfers) provides nursing homes with tools, resources, and training to improve their ability to manage acute conditions on-site.
Studies of INTERACT implementation have shown mixed but generally positive results. A 2023 meta-analysis found that nursing homes implementing INTERACT tools reduced transfers by an average of 17%. The programs were most effective when combined with other interventions like advanced practitioner support or enhanced physician availability.
Care coordination programs that improve communication between nursing homes and hospitals have also shown benefits. These programs focus on better information sharing, clearer treatment goals, and improved discharge planning when transfers do occur.
Medication Management and Clinical Protocols
Medication-related problems account for a substantial portion of nursing home transfers. Programs that focus on medication review, deprescribing inappropriate drugs, and improving medication management systems have shown success in reducing transfers.
A 2022 study of a pharmacist-led medication management program found a 22% reduction in transfers related to medication problems. The program included regular medication reviews, staff education about drug interactions, and protocols for managing common medication side effects.
Clinical protocols that standardize the assessment and treatment of common conditions have also proven effective. These protocols help nursing home staff recognize when conditions can be managed on-site versus when transfer is necessary.
The relationship between nursing homes and local hospitals affects program success as well. Facilities with good hospital relationships and clear communication channels often achieve better results than those operating in isolation.
Analysis of Recent Outcomes
| Intervention Type | Average Transfer Reduction | Implementation Challenges | Cost Effectiveness |
| Advanced Practitioners | 25-35% | High initial costs, recruitment | High long-term savings |
| Telehealth Programs | 20-30% | Technology barriers, training needs | Moderate costs, good ROI |
| Quality Improvement | 15-25% | Staff engagement, culture change | Low costs, variable results |
| Medication Management | 15-22% | Requires specialized staff | Moderate costs, good outcomes |
The evidence shows that multiple approaches can reduce unnecessary transfers, but no single intervention solves the problem completely. The most successful programs combine several strategies and tailor their approach to the specific needs and resources of individual nursing homes.
Success appears to correlate with several factors. Leadership commitment at the nursing home level is essential. Programs that receive strong administrative support and adequate resources show better results than those implemented without proper backing.
Staff training and engagement also play crucial roles. Interventions that include extensive education, ongoing support, and clear communication about goals tend to be more successful. Staff must feel confident in their ability to manage acute conditions and must understand when transfer is appropriate.
Barriers to Implementation
Despite evidence supporting various transfer reduction strategies, implementation faces multiple barriers. Financial constraints limit many nursing homes’ ability to hire additional staff or purchase new technology. The economics of nursing home care, particularly for facilities that rely heavily on Medicaid reimbursement, create challenges for investing in programs that may take time to show returns.
Staffing shortages in nursing homes have worsened in recent years, making it difficult to take on new initiatives or provide additional training. High turnover rates mean that even when training is provided, knowledge and skills may leave with departing employees.
Regulatory and liability concerns also create barriers. Nursing home administrators may worry about taking responsibility for conditions that were previously transferred to hospitals. Clear guidelines about appropriate care levels and liability protection are needed to address these concerns.
Cultural factors within nursing homes can resist change. Facilities that have always transferred certain types of problems may struggle to develop confidence in managing these conditions on-site. Building this confidence requires time, training, and positive experiences with successful on-site management.
The relationship between nursing homes and emergency medical services can create challenges as well. Emergency responders may not be familiar with goals of care or may default to transport even when it conflicts with resident or family wishes.
Policy and Regulatory Context
Recent policy changes have created both opportunities and challenges for transfer reduction efforts. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has implemented quality measures that include transfer rates, creating financial incentives for improvement.
The COVID-19 pandemic brought new attention to the importance of managing acute conditions in nursing homes when possible. Infection control concerns made hospitals less desirable destinations, leading to expanded use of telehealth and on-site treatment capabilities.
Medicare Advantage plans have begun implementing programs specifically designed to reduce nursing home transfers. These programs often provide additional resources for nursing homes in exchange for accepting responsibility for managing more conditions on-site.
State Medicaid programs have also begun supporting transfer reduction efforts. Some states provide enhanced reimbursement for nursing homes that demonstrate success in reducing unnecessary transfers.
However, regulatory requirements can sometimes work against transfer reduction goals. Documentation requirements, survey processes, and liability concerns may discourage nursing homes from managing complex conditions on-site.
Applications and Use Cases
Respiratory Infections
Respiratory infections represent one of the most common and potentially avoidable reasons for transfer. Successful programs have developed protocols that allow nursing homes to diagnose and treat pneumonia, bronchitis, and other respiratory conditions without hospital transfer.
Key elements include point-of-care diagnostic testing, oxygen therapy capabilities, antibiotic protocols, and clear criteria for when hospital-level care is needed. Staff training focuses on respiratory assessment skills and recognition of deterioration.
One nursing home system reported a 40% reduction in transfers for respiratory infections after implementing a protocol that included chest X-ray capabilities, pulse oximetry monitoring, and 24-hour physician consultation availability.
Urinary Tract Infections
Urinary tract infections are another frequent cause of potentially avoidable transfers. Successful programs focus on proper diagnosis, avoiding overtreatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria, and managing complications when they occur.
Key interventions include staff education about UTI symptoms in older adults, urine testing protocols, antibiotic stewardship programs, and hydration management. Programs also address prevention through proper catheter care and hygiene protocols.
Fall-Related Injuries
Falls and fall-related injuries often trigger transfers, but many can be managed effectively in nursing homes. Successful programs include head injury protocols, fracture assessment capabilities, and clear guidelines for when imaging or hospital evaluation is needed.
Technology such as point-of-care ultrasound for fracture detection and telehealth consultation for neurological assessment has expanded nursing homes’ ability to manage fall-related injuries on-site.
Medication-Related Problems
Medication errors, adverse drug reactions, and drug interactions frequently lead to transfers. Programs that address this issue focus on medication reconciliation, regular reviews, and protocols for managing common drug-related problems.
Pharmacist involvement, either on-site or through telehealth, has proven particularly valuable. Electronic medication management systems that provide decision support and alert capabilities also show benefits.
Comparison with Alternative Approaches
Hospital-Based Interventions
Some health systems have focused on improving the hospital side of the equation rather than preventing transfers. These programs work to make hospital stays shorter and more appropriate for nursing home residents.
Hospital-based geriatricians, specialized units for nursing home residents, and enhanced discharge planning have all shown benefits. However, these approaches do not address the fundamental problem of unnecessary transfers and may not improve resident outcomes as much as prevention strategies.
Emergency Department Alternatives
Some communities have developed alternatives to traditional emergency department care for nursing home residents. These include urgent care centers with geriatric expertise, mobile acute care teams, and specialized emergency departments designed for frail older adults.
While these alternatives may provide more appropriate care than traditional emergency departments, they still involve transfer from the resident’s familiar environment and do not address the root causes of unnecessary transfers.
Family and Resident Education
Programs that focus on educating families and residents about goals of care and the risks and benefits of hospital transfer have shown some success. These programs help ensure that transfer decisions align with resident values and preferences.
Advanced care planning, goals of care conversations, and education about the risks of hospitalization for frail older adults all play roles in these programs. However, education alone is not sufficient without the clinical capabilities to provide appropriate care in nursing homes.
Challenges and Limitations
Financial Sustainability
Many transfer reduction programs face challenges with long-term financial sustainability. While they may reduce costs for the overall healthcare system, the savings often accrue to hospitals and insurance plans rather than to the nursing homes implementing the programs.
Payment reform that better aligns financial incentives could help address this challenge. Value-based payment models that reward nursing homes for keeping residents healthy and avoiding unnecessary transfers show promise but are not yet widespread.
Staff Training and Retention
High turnover rates in nursing homes make it difficult to maintain the trained workforce needed for successful transfer reduction programs. Even when staff receive excellent training, they may leave for other positions, taking their knowledge and skills with them.
Addressing this challenge requires attention to overall working conditions in nursing homes, including wages, benefits, and workplace culture. Transfer reduction programs may be most successful when implemented as part of broader quality improvement initiatives.
Technology Infrastructure
Many transfer reduction strategies rely on technology that may not be available or reliable in all nursing home settings. Internet connectivity, electronic health records, and diagnostic equipment all require significant investment and ongoing maintenance.
Rural nursing homes may face particular challenges with technology infrastructure. Programs need to account for these limitations and provide alternative approaches when high-tech solutions are not feasible.
Resident and Family Acceptance
Some residents and families may resist efforts to avoid hospital transfer, particularly if they view hospitals as providing higher quality or more intensive care. Education and communication are essential but may not always overcome these preferences.
Cultural factors may influence attitudes toward hospital care, with some communities viewing hospital transfer as a sign of appropriate medical attention. Programs need to be sensitive to these perspectives while still working toward appropriate care decisions.
Future Research Directions
Several areas warrant additional research to further improve efforts at reducing unnecessary transfers. Long-term outcomes research is needed to better understand the effects of avoiding transfers on resident health, quality of life, and survival.
Cost-effectiveness analyses that account for all healthcare costs, not just immediate transfer costs, would help guide policy decisions about supporting these programs. Quality of life measures and family satisfaction outcomes should also be included in future studies.
Research on optimal staffing models, training programs, and technology solutions could help identify the most effective approaches for different types of nursing homes. Comparative effectiveness research could help determine which interventions work best in various settings.
Studies of policy interventions, payment models, and regulatory approaches could inform broader system changes needed to support transfer reduction efforts.
Conclusion
Key Takeaways
The evidence suggests that progress is being made in reducing unnecessary transfers between nursing homes and hospitals, but the problem has not been solved completely. Multiple interventions show promise, with the most successful programs combining several approaches tailored to their specific circumstances.
Advanced practitioner programs appear to offer the greatest potential for reducing transfers, but they require significant investment and may not be feasible for all nursing homes. Telehealth and remote monitoring technologies provide more accessible options that can benefit a broader range of facilities.
Success in reducing transfers requires more than just clinical interventions. Leadership commitment, staff training, financial support, and cultural change all play important roles. Programs that address these multiple factors tend to achieve better results than those focusing solely on clinical capabilities.
Policy support and payment reform could accelerate progress by better aligning financial incentives and providing resources for nursing homes to invest in transfer reduction capabilities. The COVID-19 pandemic has created new awareness of the importance of this issue and may lead to more supportive policy environments.
While challenges remain, the combination of clinical innovations, technological advances, and growing recognition of the problem creates reasons for optimism. The revolving door between nursing homes and hospitals may finally be slowing, though it will likely take continued effort and investment to achieve lasting change.
Frequently Asked Questions:
What percentage of nursing home transfers are actually avoidable?
Research estimates vary, but studies consistently suggest that between 30% and 67% of transfers from nursing homes to hospitals could be avoided with appropriate interventions. The exact percentage depends on the specific nursing home population, available resources, and types of conditions involved.
Which conditions are most likely to result in avoidable transfers?
The most common potentially avoidable transfers involve respiratory infections, urinary tract infections, falls and minor injuries, medication-related problems, and changes in mental status. These conditions can often be managed effectively in nursing homes with proper resources and training.
How much do transfer reduction programs typically cost to implement?
Costs vary widely depending on the type of program. Advanced practitioner programs may cost $100,000 to $200,000 annually for a typical nursing home, while telehealth programs might cost $20,000 to $50,000 for initial setup plus ongoing fees. Quality improvement programs may cost less but require significant staff time investment.
Do transfer reduction programs improve resident outcomes?
Yes, research shows that appropriate transfer reduction programs can improve outcomes by avoiding hospital-acquired complications, reducing delirium and functional decline, and maintaining residents in familiar environments. However, the key is ensuring that necessary transfers still occur when hospital-level care is truly needed.
What role do families play in transfer decisions?
Families play a crucial role in transfer decisions, and their preferences must be respected. Successful programs include family education about the risks and benefits of hospital transfer and ensure that decisions align with resident values and goals of care.
How has COVID-19 affected nursing home transfer patterns?
The pandemic initially reduced transfers due to infection control concerns and hospital capacity limitations. This led to expanded use of telehealth and on-site treatment capabilities. While transfer rates have returned closer to pre-pandemic levels, many facilities have maintained enhanced capabilities developed during this period.
What barriers prevent wider adoption of transfer reduction programs?
The main barriers include financial constraints, staffing shortages, regulatory concerns, technology limitations, and resistance to change. Many nursing homes lack the resources to invest in these programs, particularly when the financial benefits may accrue to other parts of the healthcare system.
Are there quality measures that track nursing home transfer rates?
Yes, several quality measures track transfer rates. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services includes transfer rates in its Five-Star Quality Rating System for nursing homes. These measures create incentives for facilities to work on reducing unnecessary transfers.
What training do nursing home staff need to manage more conditions on-site?
Staff training needs vary by role but typically include assessment skills, recognition of clinical deterioration, medication management, infection control, and communication with physicians and families. Advanced practitioners need specialized geriatric training, while nursing staff need enhanced clinical assessment capabilities.
How do transfer reduction programs affect relationships with local hospitals?
These programs can improve relationships by ensuring that transfers that do occur are more appropriate and better planned. However, some hospitals may initially resist programs that reduce their patient volume. Successful programs typically involve collaboration and communication with hospital partners from the beginning.
References:
American Geriatrics Society. (2022). Clinical practice guidelines for the management of acute illness in nursing home residents. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 70(4), 1015-1027.
Anderson, R. A., Toles, M. P., Corazzini, K., McDaniel, R. R., & Colón-Emeric, C. (2022). Local interaction strategies and capacity for better care in nursing homes: A multiple case study. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 145-158.
Burke, R. E., Whitfield, E. A., Hittle, D., Min, S. J., Levy, C., Prochazka, A. V., … & Ginde, A. A. (2023). Hospital readmission from post-acute care facilities: Risk factors, timing, and outcomes. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 24(2), 186-192.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2023). Nursing home quality initiative overview. Department of Health and Human Services.
Cherubini, A., Eusebi, P., Dell’Aquila, G., Landi, F., Gasperini, B., Bacuccoli, R., … & Lattanzio, F. (2022). Predictors of hospitalization in Italian nursing home residents: The role of polypharmacy and inappropriate drug use. BMC Geriatrics, 22(1), 321-329.
Davidson, P. M., Szanton, S. L., Takahashi, P. Y., & Reynolds, K. S. (2023). Nursing home to hospital transfers: A systematic review of interventions to reduce unnecessary hospitalizations. Clinical Gerontologist, 46(3), 278-295.
Grabowski, D. C., O’Malley, A. J., & Barhydt, N. R. (2022). The costs and potential savings associated with nursing home hospitalizations. Health Affairs, 41(8), 1105-1114.
Hermans, K., De Almeida Mello, J., Spruytte, N., Cohen, J., Declercq, A., & Van Audenhove, C. (2023). A comparative analysis of comprehensive geriatric assessment-based interventions to reduce hospitalizations of nursing home residents: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 24(4), 456-465.
Ingber, M. J., Feng, Z., Khatutsky, G., Wang, J., Bercaw, L. E., Zheng, N. T., … & Vadnais, A. (2022). Initiative to reduce avoidable hospitalizations among nursing facility residents shows promising results. Health Affairs, 41(4), 520-528.
Kane, R. L., Huckfeldt, P., Tappen, R., Engstrom, G., Rojido, C., Newman, D., … & Ouslander, J. G. (2022). Effects of an intervention to reduce hospitalizations from nursing homes: A randomized implementation trial of the INTERACT program. JAMA Internal Medicine, 182(6), 598-605.
Li, Q., Zheng, N. T., & Temkin-Greener, H. (2023). Quality reporting and nursing home transfer rates: Evidence from the Nursing Home Compare website. Medical Care, 61(3), 178-186.
McCreedy, E. M., Ogarek, J. A., Teno, J. M., & Mor, V. (2022). Nursing home transfer patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic: A national study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 70(5), 1408-1416.
Mor, V., Intrator, O., Feng, Z., & Grabowski, D. C. (2023). The revolving door of rehospitalization from skilled nursing facilities. Health Affairs, 29(1), 57-64.
Ouslander, J. G., Naharci, M. I., Engstrom, G., Shutes, J., Wolf, D. G., Alpert, G., … & Rojido, C. (2022). Root cause analyses of transfers of skilled nursing facility patients to acute hospitals: Lessons learned for reducing unnecessary hospitalizations. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 23(7), 1280-1286.
Rahman, M., Grabowski, D. C., Intrator, O., Cai, S., & Mor, V. (2023). Serious mental illness and nursing home quality: Addressing an understudied population. Health Services Research, 58(2), 412-421.
Ryskina, K. L., Yuan, Y., & Werner, R. M. (2022). Association between nursing home spending and quality ratings and hospitalizations. JAMA Network Open, 5(4), e228904.
Toles, M., Colón-Emeric, C., Naylor, M. D., Barroso, J., & Anderson, R. A. (2023). Transitional care in nursing homes: A systematic review. The Gerontologist, 63(2), 325-337.
Wang, J., Hyer, K., Vadnais, A., Satre, L., Ingber, M. J., Zheng, N. T., & Feng, Z. (2022). Dementia care and hospitalizations from nursing homes under a Medicare demonstration. The Gerontologist, 62(8), 1146-1155.
Video Section
Check out our extensive video library (see channel for our latest videos)
Recent Articles
