Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia: What Clinical Evidence Reveals in 2025

Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia What Clinical Evidence Reveals in 2025

---

---

 Check out our extensive video library (see channel for our latest videos)

---

---

Introduction

Ultrasound guided regional anesthesia has transformed the practice of pain management by enhancing precision, improving patient outcomes, and reducing the risks traditionally associated with landmark-based techniques. Recent data indicate that approximately 70.8 percent of patients achieve substantial pain relief following ultrasound guided nerve blocks, positioning this modality as a cornerstone of contemporary multimodal analgesia. Over the past decade, its adoption has grown rapidly across anesthesiology, emergency medicine, pain medicine, and surgical subspecialties, reflecting both practitioner confidence and strong clinical outcomes.

The safety profile associated with ultrasound guidance provides some of the most compelling support for its widespread integration. A multisite study conducted across 11 emergency departments reported only a 0.4 percent complication rate among 2,742 procedures, highlighting the considerable improvement in procedural safety. This reduction in adverse events aligns with broader trends showing decreased rates of local anesthetic systemic toxicity, needle related injuries, and neurologic complications since the introduction of real-time imaging. The ability to directly visualize anatomic structures, needle advancement, spread of local anesthetic, and target nerves has markedly reduced technical uncertainty and improved procedural consistency.

Beyond safety, ultrasound guided regional anesthesia offers meaningful practical advantages. Recent research demonstrates that effective nerve blockade can often be achieved with smaller volumes of local anesthetics due to more accurate deposition of medication around the intended neural structures. This efficiency reduces the risk of systemic toxicity and expands the range of blocks that can be performed safely in high-risk patients. Moreover, the evolving field of interfascial plane blocks has broadened the scope of regional anesthesia practice. Techniques such as the transversus abdominis plane block, erector spinae plane block, serratus anterior plane block, and quadratus lumborum block have become standard components of perioperative pain management, offering versatile options for both acute and chronic pain scenarios.

The atlas of ultrasound guided regional anesthesia continues to grow, supporting its use across a wide range of clinical settings. In 2025, these techniques play an increasingly important role in orthopedic, obstetric, thoracic, and abdominal surgery, and they are expanding further into outpatient and emergency care. Their contribution to enhanced recovery pathways is well established, with evidence demonstrating reductions in postoperative opioid requirements, improvements in functional recovery, and higher patient satisfaction.

This article reviews the current clinical evidence supporting ultrasound guided regional anesthesia, highlights its diverse and expanding applications, and discusses the evolving role of these techniques across surgical and medical specialties. It also explores emerging trends, including advances in visualization technology, machine learning assisted needle tracking, and efforts to standardize training and competency assessment. As regional anesthesia continues to mature, ultrasound guidance remains central to improving safety, efficacy, and the overall quality of pain management in modern clinical practice.

 

---

Clinical Milestones in Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia (2025 Update)

The exponential growth of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (UGRA) continues to reshape perioperative care across medical specialties. Once considered a niche technique, UGRA has evolved into a foundational pillar of modern anesthetic practice and a key enabler of individualized perioperative care [1]. This evolution stems from continuous refinement of traditional approaches and introduction of novel techniques that enhance precision and patient outcomes.

Adoption trends across surgical specialties

The market for ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia demonstrates steady expansion, driven by increasing preference for minimally invasive procedures and enhanced patient safety protocols [2]. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks specifically are projected to grow at an impressive 8.1% CAGR between 2025 and 2035, gaining traction due to their effectiveness in providing analgesia for abdominal surgeries [3]. TAP blocks help reduce post-surgical opioid use, aligning with global trends toward opioid-sparing anesthesia strategies.

In orthopedic surgery—where postoperative pain is often severe and functional recovery depends on early mobilization—peripheral nerve blocks have consistently demonstrated substantial benefits [1]. Meanwhile, ambulatory surgical centers represent the fastest-growing end-user segment with a projected 8.3% CAGR through 2035 [3]. This growth reflects the increasing shift toward outpatient procedures due to shorter recovery times, reduced costs, and patient preference.

Across surgical domains, ultrasound guidance has transformed block delivery by:

• Enabling more accurate needle placement with real-time visualization
• Allowing targeted, lower-dose administration of local anesthetics
• Minimizing risk of systemic toxicity
• Supporting blocks previously considered technically challenging

The global ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia market, valued at USD 241.9 million in 2020, is expected to reach USD 420.2 million by 2028, registering a 7.1% CAGR [3]. This growth reflects increasing healthcare spending, rising availability of research funding, and continuous technological improvements in ultrasound imaging quality.

Integration into ERAS protocols and multimodal analgesia

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have fundamentally changed perioperative care by optimizing patient outcomes and expediting recovery [4]. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia now serves as a cornerstone of these protocols, with its seamless integration into acute pain management pathways having far-reaching implications beyond superior analgesia [1].

In a landmark population-based study analyzing over 1.3 million hysterectomy patients, multimodal analgesia strategies incorporating regional anesthesia demonstrated remarkable outcomes: 35% reduction in overall complications, 24% decrease in opioid consumption, and 14% shorter hospital stays [1]. Furthermore, the study revealed approximately 40% fewer respiratory complications, 30% reduction in cardiac complications, and 40% decrease in genitourinary complications compared to patients without multimodal analgesia [1].

The integration of UGRA into multimodal analgesic pathways has proven particularly valuable. According to recent findings, combinations of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs plus dexamethasone or regional anesthesia resulted in the greatest reductions in postoperative opioid use, with mean reductions of 29.5 oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) and 28.4 OMEs, respectively [5]. However, contrary to common practice, acetaminophen—despite being the most frequently used non-opioid analgesic—showed minimal impact on postoperative pain and opioid requirements when used within multimodal regimens [5].

Notably, ultrasound-guided blocks have found specialized applications within cardiac surgery ERAS protocols. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block has emerged as a valuable technique with documented perioperative analgesic benefits and minimal risk of adverse outcomes such as hematoma, pneumothorax, or neurological deficits [5]. Similarly, thoracic paravertebral blocks and serratus anterior plane blocks have demonstrated effectiveness in cardiac surgeries while maintaining safety profiles suitable for anticoagulated patients [5].

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has recognized this evolution, defining multimodal analgesia as “the use of two or more drugs and/or interventions, excluding systemic opioids” [5]. Since 2023, CMS has collected data on multimodal analgesia as part of its Merit-based Incentive Payment System, highlighting the growing importance of understanding optimal combinations for these approaches [5].

---

Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB): Evidence from 2025 Trials

The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has evolved from a novel technique to a fundamental component of modern ultrasound guided regional anesthesia protocols. First described in 2016 for neuropathic pain management, ESPB involves depositing local anesthetic into the fascial plane between the erector spinae muscle and the vertebral transverse processes. Recent clinical trials have explored its efficacy across various anatomical approaches and patient populations.

Thoracic vs lumbar ESPB effectiveness

The anatomical location of ESPB administration affects clinical outcomes across different surgical procedures. In abdominal surgeries, ESPB demonstrated lower Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores than paravertebral block (PVB) (Mean Difference = −0.8, 95% CI: −1.1 to −0.5) [6]. Conversely, thoracic ESPB showed inconsistent results across studies, with some meta-analyzes indicating superior analgesia with PVB in thoracic procedures [7].

The mechanism behind these regional differences relates to the anatomical structure of the erector spinae fascia, which allows analgesic agents to travel at least three vertebrae cranially and four vertebrae caudally from the injection site [8]. This spread pattern explains why lumbar ESPB effectively covers abdominal dermatomes while thoracic ESPB may have variable effectiveness in thoracic surgeries.

For laparoscopic cholecystectomy specifically, ultrasound-guided bilateral ESPB produced prolonged anesthesia duration, with patients requiring rescue analgesia at approximately 11.20 ± 2.998 hours versus just 0.5 ± 0.213 hours in control groups [2]. Additionally, the total tramadol dose over 24 hours was markedly lower with ESPB (172.92 ± 36.092 mg) compared to standard analgesia (245.83 ± 58.823 mg) [2].

Pediatric vs adult outcomes in ESPB

Erector spinae plane block has shown distinct benefits in pediatric populations. In pediatric cardiac surgery via midline sternotomy, ESPB reduced intraoperative fentanyl requirements (MD −1.90 μg.kg−1; 95% CI −3.15 to −0.66 μg.kg−1) and decreased ICU length of stay (MD -3.50 h; 95% CI -4.32 to −2.69 h) [3].

Interestingly, when compared to caudal epidural block (CEB) in pediatric patients, ESPB prolonged the time to first rescue analgesia (SMD = 2.75, p < 0.0001) and improved Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scores at 24 hours postoperatively [3]. These advantages may stem from the variable distensibility of fascial planes in pediatric patients and incomplete nerve fiber myelination, potentially enhancing local anesthetic distribution.

For pediatric thoracic surgeries, ESPB has proven comparable to serratus anterior plane block (SAPB), with equivalent perioperative analgesia indicated by similar intraoperative fentanyl consumption and postoperative pain scores [9]. These findings establish ESPB as a valuable technique for pediatric procedures, especially in cardiac and thoracic settings where opioid reduction is particularly beneficial.

ESPB vs paravertebral block: comparative analgesia

The comparative efficacy of ESPB versus paravertebral block (PVB) represents one of the most thoroughly investigated aspects of interfascial plane blocks. A 2025 meta-analysis including 33 randomized controlled trials with 2,256 patients found no substantial difference between ESPB and PVB for resting VAS at 6 hours (mean difference = −0.08, 95% CI: −0.44 to 0.27) [6]. In fact, ESPB demonstrated lower VAS than PVB at 12 hours, though PVB showed lower morphine consumption overall [6].

The blocks differ in key characteristics:

• Technical complexity: ESPB is generally easier to perform, typically requiring only 5-10 minutes per side [6]
• Safety profile: ESPB carries lower risk of pneumothorax or vascular puncture due to its more superficial plane [6]
• Dermatomal coverage: PVB provides more reliable dermatomal coverage, with adequate coverage in 79.6% of cases versus 44.1% with ESPB in breast cancer surgery [10]

Nevertheless, the mechanism of ESPB primarily targets dorsal rami of spinal nerves, creating effective truncal analgesia without complications associated with paravertebral approaches [11]. This advantage makes ESPB particularly valuable for patients with coagulation concerns or in settings where complications carry higher risk.

Ultimately, the choice between ESPB and PVB should be guided by surgical site, patient factors, and practitioner expertise. For abdominal procedures, metabolic surgery, and pediatric cases, ESPB offers compelling advantages, while PVB may be preferable for thoracic surgeries where consistent dermatomal coverage is essential.

---

Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Blocks in Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery

Advanced regional anesthesia techniques have become cornerstone approaches in cardiac and thoracic surgery, offering substantial benefits beyond traditional pain management methods. Recent clinical evidence demonstrates how ultrasound-guided nerve blocks provide enhanced pain control with reduced side effects in these complex surgical domains.

Continuous proximal intercostal block for mini-thoracotomy

Continuous intercostal nerve block (CINB) has emerged as an effective analgesic strategy for patients undergoing mini-thoracotomy procedures. In a randomized study examining intrapleural intercostal nerve block (IINB) for major lung resections via mini-thoracotomy, patients receiving IINB reported notably lower pain scores at all measured time points compared to control groups [12]. Consequently, these patients experienced shorter postoperative hospital stays (5.7 days versus 6.5 days) [12].

The technical refinement of continuous intercostal nerve blocks has addressed previous limitations of single-injection techniques. Modern approaches utilize multi-orifice catheters placed under thoracoscopic guidance, delivering continuous local anesthetic infusion [13]. This modified continuous intercostal nerve block (MCINB) technique has demonstrated noteworthy efficacy:

• Significantly lower numeric rating scale pain scores at rest and during coughing
• Higher patient satisfaction with pain management (90.3% versus 65.6%)
• Reduced hospital stays and lower total medical costs
• Decreased rescue analgesic use with fewer side effects [13]

Elastomeric infusion pumps have revolutionized continuous ICNB delivery, enabling uninterrupted administration of local anesthetics over 2-7 days [4]. These devices connect to catheters positioned near target nerves, providing stable analgesic concentrations that avoid rebound pain while reducing invasive procedures [4]. Initially, 3-5 mL of local anesthetic is injected per intercostal level, with total dosing calculated according to patient weight and maximum permissible drug dose [4].

Parasternal subpectoral plane block for sternotomy

The parasternal subpectoral plane block (PSPB) represents a valuable advancement for managing post-sternotomy pain. A randomized controlled trial evaluating continuous bilateral PSPB following sternotomy revealed that patients receiving this block alongside standard multimodal analgesia experienced substantially lower pain scores and reduced opioid consumption through postoperative day 4 [14]. Moreover, these patients demonstrated a 44% reduction in total postoperative opioid consumption (75.1 vs 133.1 morphine milligram equivalents) and required one fewer hospital day of opioid administration [14].

Further evidence supporting PSPB comes from research examining catheter superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks using programmed intermittent bolus regimens. This technique resulted in markedly decreased cumulative morphine consumption within 48 hours after surgery (25.34 ± 31.1 mg versus 76.28 ± 77.2 mg) [15]. Additionally, patients reported lower numeric rating scale pain scores at all recorded time points and experienced fewer instances of postoperative nausea and vomiting (10.3% versus 41.4%) [15].

Institutions implementing ultrasound-guided pectointercostal fascial block with 0.25% bupivacaine before sternotomy have observed reduced intraoperative opioid requirements and improved hemodynamic stability [16]. Research indicates that preincision administration of these blocks can significantly reduce median maximum effect-site concentrations of intraoperative remifentanil and propofol, while also limiting concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines [16].

Safety in anticoagulated patients

The safety profile of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks in anticoagulated patients remains a primary consideration for cardiac and thoracic surgery patients. Current guidelines recommend that adult patients on cardioaspirin therapy undergoing regional anesthesia with neuraxial block may continue cardioaspirin administration, as evidence suggests this does not increase spinal hematoma incidence [5]. Conversely, practitioners must observe specific time intervals regarding antithrombotic medications before and after neuraxial procedures or deep, noncompressible peripheral nerve blocks [17].

The expert consensus differentiates between deep and superficial peripheral nerve blocks regarding bleeding risk. Deep peripheral nerve blocks, such as lumbar plexus blocks, carry higher bleeding risk and cannot be performed safely without adequate suspension of anticoagulant medications [5]. Alternatively, superficial peripheral nerve blocks can be performed safely in anticoagulated adult patients even when medications cannot be suspended, with hemorrhagic complications remaining anecdotal [5].

For ultrasound-guided procedures specifically, research indicates that adult patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) can safely undergo ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks without increased hemorrhagic complications [5]. One study reported similar rates of major hemorrhagic events in patients undergoing anticoagulant therapy with DOACs receiving femoral nerve block (54%) compared to patients receiving conventional analgesics only (47%) [5].

The integration of these regional techniques into cardiac and thoracic Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols has become increasingly common due to their demonstrated ability to reduce postoperative pain, decrease perioperative opioid use, accelerate recovery, and improve patient satisfaction [18].

---

Breast Surgery Under Regional Anesthesia: What Works and What Doesn’t

Regional anesthesia for breast surgery has fundamentally changed operative approaches, with multiple block combinations now enabling awake or minimally sedated procedures across various surgical complexities. Breast procedures present unique challenges that require thoughtful regional anesthesia selection based on surgical approach, anatomical considerations, and patient factors.

Paravertebral + pectoral block combination

The synergistic effect of combining paravertebral blocks (PVBs) with pectoral plane blocks demonstrates superior analgesic efficacy compared to either technique alone. This combination effectively addresses both the anterior and lateral chest wall innervation patterns crucial for comprehensive breast surgery analgesia. A recent multicenter trial demonstrated that patients receiving combined PVB and PECS-II blocks required 63% less opioid consumption in the first 24 hours postoperatively compared to standard analgesic protocols.

Ultrasound guided regional anesthesia techniques for the breast typically involve a methodical approach. First, thoracic paravertebral blocks target the anterior primary rami of T2-T6 spinal nerves, providing sensory blockade to the majority of the breast. Subsequently, a PECS-II block addresses the lateral mammary branches, long thoracic nerve, and thoracodorsal nerve – areas often missed by PVB alone. This dual-block approach ensures complete coverage of the axillary tail of the breast, an area particularly relevant in oncological surgery.

Unlike either technique performed in isolation, the combined approach enables considerable advantages, albeit with added procedural time. Patients receiving this combination demonstrate fewer instances of rescue analgesic requirements, shorter post-anesthesia care unit stays, and enhanced patient satisfaction scores.

Innervation complexity and block limitations

The intricate innervation of breast tissue presents substantial challenges for comprehensive analgesia. The breast receives neural input from multiple sources:

• Anterior cutaneous branches of T2-T6 intercostal nerves
• Lateral cutaneous branches of T2-T6 intercostal nerves
• Supraclavicular nerves (C3-C4)
• Pectoral nerves (medial and lateral)

This anatomical complexity explains why single injection techniques often provide incomplete analgesia. Ultrasound for regional anesthesia has improved precision yet cannot overcome fundamental anatomical variability. Undeniably, even expertly performed blocks may fail to provide complete coverage, particularly for extensive surgeries involving axillary dissection or reconstructive components.

Technical limitations must be acknowledged when planning anesthetic approaches. Procedures extending beyond the anatomical breast boundary, including those with axillary involvement, typically require additional blocks or supplemental anesthesia. Additionally, anatomical variations in nerve distribution occur in approximately 15-20% of patients, potentially resulting in incomplete blocks regardless of technique perfection.

Role of sedation and patient preference

Patient experience during breast surgery under regional anesthesia varies substantially depending on sedation protocols. Essentially, practitioners face a spectrum of choices ranging from minimal sedation to deeper propofol-based techniques. Procedural complexity and expected duration primarily determine sedation requirements, alongside patient anxiety levels.

Research into patient preferences reveals interesting patterns. Initially, many patients express concern about potential intraoperative awareness. Nevertheless, following thorough education about regional techniques, approximately 70% of eligible patients select regional approaches over general anesthesia when given a choice. Patient satisfaction scores remain highest when expectations are carefully managed through comprehensive preoperative education regarding sensations they might experience.

Dexmedetomidine has emerged as a valuable adjunct, providing anxiolysis and sedation without respiratory depression. At dosages between 0.2-0.7 µg/kg/hr, it facilitates comfortable intraoperative conditions while maintaining patient responsiveness. Furthermore, this approach addresses common patient concerns about nausea, vomiting, and postoperative cognitive dysfunction associated with general anesthesia.

The atlas of ultrasound guided regional anesthesia continues to expand with refined approaches for breast surgery, making these techniques increasingly accessible to practitioners seeking to reduce opioid requirements and improve recovery profiles.

 

---

Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgeries: UGRA for Visceral and Somatic Pain

Minimally invasive surgical approaches require tailored analgesic strategies that address both somatic and visceral pain components. In recent years, ultrasound guided regional anesthesia has enabled precise delivery of local anesthetics for patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic procedures, thereby allowing enhanced recovery with reduced opioid requirements.

TAP, rectus sheath, and external oblique intercostal blocks

The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has demonstrated considerable effectiveness for laparoscopic procedures. Patients receiving TAP blocks following laparoscopic surgery required 25.46 mg less morphine during the first 24 hours compared to those without blocks [19]. Along with opioid reduction, TAP blocks significantly reduced pain scores at 2 hours (mean difference = -1.55) and 6 hours (mean difference = -1.13) postoperatively [19]. Yet surprisingly, these analgesic benefits typically diminish by 24 hours.

External oblique intercostal (EOI) blocks represent a novel technique gaining traction for upper abdominal surgeries. First described by Hamilton and further evaluated by Elsharkawy, this approach targets both anterior and lateral cutaneous branches of thoracoabdominal nerves [1]. For laparoscopic cholecystectomy, EOI blocks reduced 24-hour sufentanil consumption and improved pain scores compared to standard multimodal analgesia [1]. The practical advantages of EOI blocks include:

• Superficial anatomical location allowing easy ultrasound identification
• Ability to perform in supine position
• Distance from surgical site permitting preoperative catheter placement
• Lower risk of complications compared to deeper blocks [20]

The rectus sheath block (RSB) shows particular promise for robotic procedures. In robotic prostatectomy, patients receiving ultrasound guided RSB consumed 8.81 mg of opioids compared to 19.87 mg in control groups [21]. Interestingly, RSB also reduced urethral catheter discomfort at all measured time points [21], addressing a common patient complaint. This block primarily targets anterior cutaneous branches of thoracic spinal nerves (T7-T12), making it ideal for periumbilical and midline incisions [22].

For laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, EOI blocks produced superior results to port-site infiltration, with lower Visual Analog Scale scores during both rest and movement through 12 postoperative hours [23]. Total 24-hour fentanyl consumption was markedly reduced (505.83 μg vs 880.83 μg) [23], illustrating this technique’s efficacy for upper abdominal procedures.

Systemic effects of high-volume fascial plane blocks

The increasing popularity of fascial plane blocks brings important considerations regarding systemic absorption and potential toxicity. These blocks typically employ high volumes (20-40 mL) of local anesthetic to maximize spread across fascial planes [24]. Although average plasma concentrations generally remain below established toxic thresholds, individual patients occasionally cross these limits [24].

Fascial plane blocks present higher risk for local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) than traditional techniques because of their relatively high volumes and absorption rates [25]. This risk increases in patients with low muscle mass, including neonates, children, and elderly individuals [25]. The mechanism involves rapid uptake through the lymphatic system, creating high plasma concentrations with prolonged elimination half-lives [26].

To minimize LAST risk, practitioners should calculate weight-based doses, aspirate before injection, administer incrementally, monitor closely, and observe injectate spread with ultrasound [24]. Adding low-dose epinephrine to fascial plane blocks may reduce systemic absorption. As volume increases, concentration should decrease to maintain total doses below maximum recommendations [24].

Ultimately, understanding the dual somatic and visceral components of laparoscopic surgical pain helps practitioners select appropriate regional techniques based on anatomical considerations and surgical approach rather than applying one-size-fits-all solutions.

---

Pediatric Regional Anesthesia: Beyond the Caudal Block

Pediatric regional anesthesia has undergone impressive evolution with the advent of ultrasound technology, expanding beyond traditional caudal blocks toward more sophisticated approaches. The integration of advanced imaging has improved block precision while enhancing safety profiles, making regional techniques increasingly valuable for perioperative pain management in children.

Ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block via Shamrock approach

The Shamrock technique, first described in 2013, represents a paradigm shift in performing lumbar plexus blocks (LPB) in pediatric patients. This approach utilizes transverse plane scanning from the patient’s flank, creating an easily recognizable ultrasonographic pattern resembling a shamrock with three leaves—the psoas muscle, erector spinae muscle, and quadratus lumborum muscle surrounding the transverse process [27]. This distinctive pattern facilitates accurate needle placement and enhances practitioner confidence.

Clinical dosing studies have established an ED50 of 20.4 ml and ED95 of 36 ml of ropivacaine 0.5% for successful Shamrock LPB [27]. For procedures not requiring motor blockade, lower volumes (ED50 of 17.1 ml) prove sufficient [27]. Practically speaking, the Shamrock approach streamlines lumbar plexus blocks by:

• Improving needle visibility with in-plane advancement
• Requiring fewer needle insertions (2 versus 6 with traditional techniques) [28]
• Reducing procedure time (238 seconds versus 334 seconds) [28]
• Enhancing patient comfort during block placement [28]

Importantly, this technique provides analgesia for hip, proximal femur, and anterior thigh surgeries while offering distinct advantages over neuraxial techniques, including unilateral sympathectomy that prevents hemodynamic instability [29].

ESPB and interfascial blocks in pediatric thoracic surgery

Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has rapidly gained popularity in pediatric thoracic procedures owing to its technical simplicity and favorable safety profile. Indeed, ESPB is often preferred over paravertebral blocks in children because of its easier administration and reduced risk profile [9]. The mechanism involves local anesthetic spreading in craniocaudal directions and into paravertebral areas, thereby blocking both somatic and visceral sensory pathways [3].

Clinical evidence demonstrates that bilateral ESPB at T3-T4 level provides superior postoperative analgesia compared to standard protocols in children undergoing cardiac surgeries via midline sternotomy [30]. Furthermore, this technique significantly reduces intraoperative fentanyl consumption and shortens ICU length of stay in pediatric cardiac patients [3].

The anatomical characteristics of children—including looser connective tissue and more elastic structures—facilitate enhanced local anesthetic spread through fascial planes [31]. Hence, pediatric patients often experience more extensive block distribution with smaller volume requirements compared to adults.

Ultimately, these advances in ultrasound-guided regional techniques have dramatically expanded options beyond caudal blocks, offering targeted analgesia with improved safety profiles while supporting enhanced recovery protocols in pediatric surgical populations [3].

---

Preventing Chronic Post-Surgical Pain with UGRA

Chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) remains a persistent challenge even as advances in anesthesia techniques continue to evolve. Certain surgeries carry particularly high risk of developing this debilitating condition, yet ultrasound regional anesthesia offers promising strategies for prevention rather than just treatment after pain becomes established.

High-risk surgeries: mastectomy, thoracotomy, amputation

The incidence of CPSP varies dramatically by procedure type, with highest rates occurring in limb amputation (30-85%), thoracotomy (5-67%), and mastectomy (11-57%) [32]. These procedures share common risk factors, namely surgical disruption of major nerve pathways and inflammatory responses triggering central sensitization.

Thoracotomy stands out as one of the most painful surgical approaches, with chronic pain reported in 57% of patients at 3 months and 47% at 6 months postoperatively [2]. Effective acute pain management using ultrasound guided nerve blocks may reduce this probability [2]. For thoracotomy specifically, both paravertebral blocks and erector spinae plane blocks demonstrate effectiveness when incorporated into multimodal strategies [8].

In amputation surgeries, peripheral nerve blocks provide superior outcomes for high-risk patients. A case series examining ultrasound-guided combined femoral-sciatic nerve blocks for lower limb amputation demonstrated remarkable effectiveness—patients remained hemodynamically stable and pain-free both during surgery and postoperatively [33]. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks lasting 6 days have shown promise in treating established phantom limb pain [34], suggesting earlier intervention might prevent its development.

Breast surgery presents another high-risk category, with up to 60% of patients experiencing chronic postoperative pain [35]. Paravertebral blocks specifically show favorable results (OR 0.61) for reducing CPSP after breast procedures [35].

Preemptive analgesia and pain trajectory modulation

The concept of preemptive analgesia, first described by Wall in 1988, focuses on preventing central sensitization before it occurs [36]. By administering analgesic interventions before surgical incision, practitioners aim to inhibit nociceptive mechanisms that amplify postoperative pain [37]. Importantly, this approach addresses both peripheral and central sensitization processes [36].

Evidence suggests that prolonged multimodal therapy with anti-hyperalgesic medications, alongside regional anesthesia and nerve-sparing surgical techniques, offers the most effective strategy for decreasing CPSP incidence [32]. The timing proves crucial—ultrasound guided blocks performed before anesthesia induction provide preemptive analgesic effects that contribute to lower CPSP incidence [8].

Peripheral nerve stimulation represents another promising modality, with small studies demonstrating decreased residual limb pain, reduced opioid consumption, and diminished phantom limb pain [6]. This technique targets the peripheral component of the pain pathway, thus, potentially interrupting the sequence leading to central sensitization.

The intensity of acute postoperative pain consistently emerges as one of the strongest predictors of CPSP development [7]. Accordingly, acute pain trajectories with consistently higher intensity levels carry the greatest risk for pain chronification [7]. Therefore, ultrasound for regional anesthesia techniques that effectively control acute pain may simultaneously reduce chronic pain development.

---

Expanding the Role of UGRA Beyond the Operating Room

Ultrasound guided regional anesthesia techniques have rapidly expanded beyond traditional perioperative settings, reshaping pain management protocols across multiple clinical environments. This evolution reflects growing recognition of their versatility and effectiveness in non-surgical contexts.

Emergency department applications

Emergency medicine has embraced ultrasound guided nerve blocks as cornerstone interventions for acute pain management. The literature now includes applications not previously described, including superficial cervical plexus blocks for clavicle fractures [10]. Yet implementation remains inconsistent, with nearly 30% of emergency medicine residency programs offering no training in these techniques [10]. A recent scoping review examining 238 articles found lower extremity blocks were most frequently reported (41%), followed by truncal blocks (30%), with erector spinae plane blocks showing remarkable growth over the past five years [38]. Complications occurred in merely 0.89% of cases, including only three instances (0.03%) of local anesthetic systemic toxicity [38].

Sympathetic blocks for angina and withdrawal

Sympathetic blockade techniques have found compelling applications for conditions beyond surgical pain. Stellate ganglion blocks demonstrate up to 90% efficiency in decreasing ventricular arrhythmia burden during electrical storm, a severe form of recurrent sustained ventricular tachycardia [39]. Additionally, randomized controlled trials support stellate ganglion blockade for post-traumatic stress disorder treatment, hypothesized to work by decreasing nerve growth factor levels and reversing sympathetic nerve sprouting [39].

ICU and chronic pain interventions

Throughout intensive care units, ultrasound for regional anesthesia continues gaining traction. The percentage of ICU patients receiving locoregional analgesia techniques increased from 4.78% in 2015 to 8.90% in 2021 [11]. Peripheral nerve blocks specifically showed rapid adoption, rising from their introduction in 2017 to ten procedures annually by 2021 [11]. This expansion likely stems from both the worldwide spread of echo-guided approaches and changes in ICU team composition, gradually shifting from the paradigm of intravenous opioid analgesia toward multimodal strategies [11].

---

 

---

Conclusion   

Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia has fundamentally transformed perioperative care across medical specialties since its inception. This evolution stems not only from remarkable safety profiles—with complication rates as low as 0.4%—but also from tangible clinical benefits including reduced opioid consumption, enhanced recovery, and improved patient satisfaction. Practitioners now routinely incorporate these techniques into comprehensive multimodal analgesia strategies, acknowledging their crucial role in modern pain management.

Throughout this review, evidence demonstrates how interfascial plane blocks have expanded beyond traditional applications. The erector spinae plane block, initially described for neuropathic pain, now serves as a cornerstone intervention for thoracic, cardiac, and abdominal procedures. Similarly, specialized approaches like parasternal subpectoral plane blocks for sternotomy and continuous proximal intercostal blocks for mini-thoracotomy have revolutionized post-surgical care for traditionally painful procedures.

Perhaps most compelling, ultrasound guidance has enabled precise analgesic delivery in previously challenging anatomical locations. Practitioners can now confidently perform blocks in anticoagulated patients, pediatric populations, and high-risk surgical candidates. Additionally, these techniques address both somatic and visceral pain components—a critical consideration for laparoscopic and robotic procedures where multiple neural pathways contribute to the overall pain experience.

Beyond the operating room, regional anesthesia continues gaining traction in emergency departments, intensive care units, and chronic pain settings. This expansion reflects growing recognition of these techniques’ versatility and effectiveness across diverse clinical environments. Undoubtedly, ultrasound-guided approaches have reshaped how clinicians conceptualize and manage pain throughout the healthcare continuum.

The role of regional anesthesia in preventing chronic post-surgical pain deserves particular attention. Preemptive analgesia through ultrasound-guided blocks may interrupt central sensitization processes, potentially altering pain trajectories following high-risk procedures like mastectomy, thoracotomy, and limb amputation. Such preventative strategies represent a paradigm shift from treating established chronic pain to proactively modifying its development.

The 2025 evidence base underscores how ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia has matured from novel intervention to standard of care. As practitioners continue refining techniques and exploring new applications, these approaches will remain essential components of individualized perioperative management strategies. The future undoubtedly holds further innovation, with expanded indications and improved outcomes for patients across surgical specialties.

Key Takeaways

Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia has evolved from a specialized technique to a cornerstone of modern perioperative care, offering remarkable safety and efficacy across diverse surgical specialties.

• Safety and efficacy are proven: UGRA demonstrates exceptional safety with only 0.4% complication rates and provides substantial pain relief in 70.8% of patients receiving nerve blocks.
• Multimodal integration reduces opioids significantly: When combined with ERAS protocols, UGRA reduces opioid consumption by up to 35% and decreases overall complications by 24-40%.
• ESPB offers versatile pain management: Erector spinae plane blocks provide effective analgesia for thoracic, cardiac, and abdominal procedures with superior safety profiles compared to traditional approaches.
• Pediatric applications expand beyond caudal blocks: Advanced techniques like the Shamrock approach for lumbar plexus blocks and ESPB offer safer, more precise alternatives for pediatric surgeries.
• Chronic pain prevention is achievable: Preemptive UGRA in high-risk surgeries like mastectomy and thoracotomy can interrupt central sensitization and reduce chronic post-surgical pain development.
• Applications extend beyond operating rooms: Emergency departments, ICUs, and chronic pain clinics increasingly adopt UGRA techniques, with emergency medicine showing 41% usage for lower extremity blocks alone.

 

Frequently Asked Questions:   

FAQs

Q1. What are the main benefits of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia in 2025? Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia offers improved safety with low complication rates, provides effective pain relief, reduces opioid consumption, and enhances recovery across various surgical procedures. It has become an integral part of multimodal pain management strategies.

Q2. How effective is the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for different types of surgeries? The ESPB has proven effective for thoracic, cardiac, and abdominal procedures. It offers versatile pain management with a favorable safety profile, particularly beneficial in pediatric surgeries and for patients with coagulation concerns.

Q3. What advancements have been made in pediatric regional anesthesia? Pediatric regional anesthesia has expanded beyond traditional caudal blocks. New techniques like the Shamrock approach for lumbar plexus blocks and ESPB offer safer, more precise alternatives for various pediatric surgeries, with improved block distribution due to children’s anatomical characteristics.

Q4. Can ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia help prevent chronic post-surgical pain? Yes, preemptive ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia in high-risk surgeries like mastectomy, thoracotomy, and amputation can potentially prevent chronic post-surgical pain by interrupting central sensitization processes and modifying pain trajectories.

Q5. How has the use of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia expanded beyond the operating room? Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia techniques are increasingly used in emergency departments, intensive care units, and chronic pain clinics. They’ve shown particular promise in managing acute pain in emergency settings and providing sympathetic blocks for conditions like angina and PTSD.

 

 

---

References:  

---

[Internal Medicine -Home]

 

Video Section

---

 

Recent Articles

• Micro-Behaviors and Macro-Mindsets: An Analysis of Subtle Human Reactions
• Burnout vs. Breakthrough: Why Some Doctors Find Joy Again After Leaving Clinical Practice
• The Truth About Physician Financial Myths: What Most Doctors Get Wrong
• Revisiting Lyme Disease Management in Primary Care
• The Psychology of Everyday Life: How Small Behaviors Reflect Deep Cognitive and Emotional Processes
• Managing ADHD in Adults: A Growing Primary Care Responsibility
• Raw Honey and Early Morning Awakening: Clinical Considerations
• Hemophilia Prophylaxis in the Era of Non-Factor Therapies
• Hidden Cognitive Decline Symptoms: What Every Internist Must Know Today
• Alternative Therapies for Depression: Breakthrough Neurostimulation Methods Show 80% Success Rate
• Pediatric Sepsis: Can Rapid Genomic Diagnostics Save Lives?
• Psychedelics for Acute Suicidality: Could the ED Become the Frontline?
• Pulse Pressure Variation: The Missing Key to Fluid Responsiveness in ED
• Screen Time, Social Media, and Teen Mental Health: What Can Family Physicians Do?
• Should Family Physicians Routinely Screen for Depression and Anxiety?
• Why Standard Blood Pressure Targets After Surgery May Be Harming Your Patients
• Evidence-Based Insights into Everyday Human Behavior
• Fascinating Psychological Insights- Evidence-Based Observations About How the Human Mind and Behavior
• Glycine’s Role in Sleep Enhancement- Clinical Evidence, Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Applications
• Early Morning Awakening Syndrome- Understanding Cortisol Dysregulation
• Why GLP-1 Non-Responders Need Earlier Anti-Obesity Medication Intervention
• Tachyphylaxis in Antidepressants: The Science Behind Treatment Resistance
• The Opioid Crisis in Family Practice: Safe Prescribing vs. Abandoning Patients
• 70 Psychology Facts That Explain How the Mind and Behavior Interact
• 100 Timeless Lessons for Growth, Success, and Happiness — With Healthcare Applications
• The Hidden Patterns of the Human Mind Evidence-Based Insights
• Asthma vs. COPD in Primary Care: Are We Missing Asthma-COPD Overlap?
• Lung Cancer Screening in Primary Care: Why Uptake Remains Low
• The Hidden Cost of Skipping Frailty Assessment: New Research Reveals
• The Spectrum of AI Influence- Comparative Impact Across Medical Specialties

   

---