Clinical Pharmacology for Wegovy
Mechanism Of Action
Semaglutide is a GLP-1 analogue with 94% sequence homology to human GLP-1. Semaglutide acts as a GLP-1 receptor agonist that selectively binds to and activates the GLP-1 receptor, the target for native GLP-1.
GLP-1 is a physiological regulator of appetite and caloric intake, and the GLP-1 receptor is present in several areas of the brain involved in appetite regulation. Animal studies show that semaglutide distributed to and activated neurons in brain regions involved in regulation of food intake.
The exact mechanism of cardiovascular risk reduction has not been established.
Pharmacodynamics
Semaglutide lowers body weight with greater fat mass loss than lean mass loss. Semaglutide decreases calorie intake. The effects are likely mediated by affecting appetite.
Semaglutide stimulates insulin secretion and reduces glucagon secretion in a glucose-dependent manner. These effects can lead to a reduction of blood glucose.
Gastric Emptying
Semaglutide delays gastric emptying.
Cardiac Electrophysiology (QTc)
The effect of semaglutide on cardiac repolarization was tested in a thorough QTc trial. Semaglutide did not prolong QTc intervals at doses up to 1.5 mg at steady state.
Pharmacokinetics
Absorption
Absolute bioavailability of semaglutide is 89%. Maximum concentration of semaglutide is reached 1 to 3 days post dose.
Similar exposure was achieved with subcutaneous administration of semaglutide in the abdomen, thigh, or upper arm.
The average semaglutide steady state concentration following subcutaneous administration of WEGOVY was approximately 75 nmol/L in patients with either obesity (BMI greater than or equal to 30 kg/m²) or overweight (BMI greater than or equal to 27 kg/m²). The steady state exposure of WEGOVY increased proportionally with doses up to 2.4 mg once weekly.
Distribution
The mean volume of distribution of semaglutide following subcutaneous administration in patients with obesity or overweight is approximately 12.5 L. Semaglutide is extensively bound to plasma albumin (greater than 99%) which results in decreased renal clearance and protection from degradation.
Elimination
The apparent clearance of semaglutide in patients with obesity or overweight is approximately 0.05 L/h. With an elimination half-life of approximately 1 week, semaglutide will be present in the circulation for about 5 to 7 weeks after the last dose of 2.4 mg.
Metabolism
The primary route of elimination for semaglutide is metabolism following proteolytic cleavage of the peptide backbone and sequential beta-oxidation of the fatty acid sidechain.
Excretion
The primary excretion routes of semaglutide-related material are via the urine and feces. Approximately 3% of the dose is excreted in the urine as intact semaglutide.
Specific Populations
The effects of intrinsic factors on the pharmacokinetics of semaglutide are shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2: Impact of intrinsic factors on semaglutide exposure
Data are steady-state dose-normalized average semaglutide exposures relative to a reference subject profile (non-Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, white female aged 18 to less than 65 years, with a body weight of 110 kg and normal renal function, who injected in the abdomen). Body weight categories (74 and 143 kg) represent the 5% and 95% percentiles in the dataset.
Patients With Renal Impairment
Renal impairment did not impact the exposure of semaglutide in a clinically relevant manner. The pharmacokinetics of semaglutide were evaluated following a single dose of 0.5 mg semaglutide in a study of patients with different degrees of renal impairment (mild, moderate, severe, or ESRD) compared with subjects with normal renal function. The pharmacokinetics were also assessed in subjects with overweight (BMI 27-29.9 kg/m²) or obesity (BMI greater than or equal to 30 kg/m²) and mild to moderate renal impairment, based on data from clinical trials.
Patients With Hepatic Impairment
Hepatic impairment did not impact the exposure of semaglutide. The pharmacokinetics of semaglutide were evaluated following a single dose of 0.5 mg semaglutide in a study of patients with different degrees of hepatic impairment (mild, moderate, severe) compared with subjects with normal hepatic function.
Drug Interactions Studies
In vitro studies have shown very low potential for semaglutide to inhibit or induce CYP enzymes, or to inhibit drug transporters.
The delay of gastric emptying with semaglutide may influence the absorption of concomitantly administered oral medications [see DRUG INTERACTIONS]. The potential effect of semaglutide on the absorption of co-administered oral medications was studied in trials at semaglutide 1 mg steady-state exposure. No clinically relevant drug-drug interactions with semaglutide (Figure 3) were observed based on the evaluated medications. In a separate study, no apparent effect on the rate of gastric emptying was observed with semaglutide 2.4 mg.
Figure 3: Impact of semaglutide 1 mg on the pharmacokinetics of co-administered medications
Relative exposure in terms of AUC and Cmax for each medication when given with semaglutide compared to without semaglutide. Metformin and oral contraceptive drug (ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel) were assessed at steady state. Warfarin (S-warfarin/RÂwarfarin), digoxin and atorvastatin were assessed after a single dose. Abbreviations: AUC: area under the curve, Cmax: maximum concentration, CI: confidence interval.
Immunogenicity
The observed incidence of anti-drug antibodies is highly dependent on the sensitivity and specificity of the assay. Differences in assay methods preclude meaningful comparisons of the incidence of anti-drug antibodies in the studies described below with the incidence of anti-drug antibodies in other studies, including those of semaglutide or of other semaglutide products.
During the 68-week treatment periods in Studies 2 and 3 [see Clinical Studies], 50/1709 (3%) of WEGOVY-treated patients developed anti-semaglutide antibodies. Of these 50 WEGOVY-treated patients, 28 patients (2% of the total WEGOVY-treated study population) developed antibodies that cross-reacted with native GLP-1. No identified clinically significant effect of anti-semaglutide antibodies on pharmacokinetics for WEGOVY was observed. There is insufficient evidence to characterize the effects of anti-semaglutide antibodies on pharmacodynamics or effectiveness of semaglutide.
Clinical Studies
Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial In Adult Patients With Cardiovascular Disease And Either Obesity Or Overweight
Overview of Clinical Trial
Study 1 (NCT03574597) was a multi-national, multi-center, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial to determine the effect of WEGOVY relative to placebo on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) when added to current standard of care, which included management of CV risk factors and individualized healthy lifestyle counseling (including diet and physical activity). The primary endpoint, MACE, was the time to first occurrence of a three-part composite outcome which included cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal stroke.
All patients were 45 years or older, with an initial BMI of 27 kg/m² or greater and established cardiovascular disease (prior myocardial infarction, prior stroke, or peripheral arterial disease). Patients with a history of type 1 or type 2 diabetes were excluded. Concomitant CV therapies could be adjusted, at the discretion of the investigator, to ensure participants were treated according to the current standard of care for patients with established cardiovascular disease.
In this trial, 17,604 patients were randomized to WEGOVY or placebo. At baseline, the mean age was 62 years (range 45-93), 72% were male, 84% were White, 4% were Black or African American, and 8% were Asian, and 10% were Hispanic or Latino. Mean baseline body weight was 97 kg and mean BMI was 33 kg/m². At baseline, prior myocardial infarction was reported in 76% of randomized individuals, prior stroke in 23%, and peripheral arterial disease in 9%. Heart failure was reported in 24% of patients. At baseline, cardiovascular disease and risk factors were managed with lipid-lowering therapy (90%), platelet aggregation inhibitors (86%), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (74%), and beta blockers (70%). A total of 10% had moderate renal impairment (eGFR 30 to <60 mL/min/1.73m²) and 0.4% had severe renal impairment eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m².
Results
In total, 96.9% of patients completed the trial, and vital status was available for 99.4% of patients. The median follow-up duration was 41.8 months. A total of 31% of WEGOVY-treated patients and 27% of placebo-treated patients permanently discontinued study drug.
For the primary analysis, a Cox proportional hazards model was used to test for superiority. Type 1 error was controlled across multiple tests.
WEGOVY significantly reduced the risk for first occurrence of MACE. The estimated hazard ratio (95% CI) was 0.80 (0.72, 0.90) (see Figure 4 and Table 5).
Figure 4: Cumulative Incidence Function: Time to First Occurrence of MACE in Study 1
Data from the in-trial period. Cumulative incidence estimates are based on time from randomization to first EAC-confirmed cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke with non-CV death modeled as competing risk using the Aalen-Johansen estimator. Patients without events of interest were censored at the end of their in-trial observation period. Time from randomization to first cardiovascular death, nonÂfatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model with treatment as categorical fixed factor. The hazard ratio and confidence interval are adjusted for the group sequential design using the likelihood ratio ordering. HR: Hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval; CV: cardiovascular
The treatment effect for the primary composite endpoint, its components, and other relevant endpoints in Study 1 are shown in Table 5.
Table 5: Treatment Effect for MACE and Other Events in Study 1
|
Patients with events n (%) |
Hazard Ratio (95% CI) |
Placebo
N = 8,801 |
WEGOVY
N = 8,803 |
| Primary composite endpoint |
| Composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke1 |
701
(8.0%) |
569
(6.5%) |
0.80
(0.72; 0.90)*2 |
| Key secondary endpoints |
| Cardiovascular death3 |
262
(3.0%) |
223
(2.5%) |
0.85
(0.71; 1.01) |
| All-cause death4 |
458
(5.2%) |
375
(4.3%) |
0.81
(0.71; 0.93) |
| Other secondary endpoints |
|
|
|
| Fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction5 |
334
(3.8%) |
243
(2.8%) |
0.72
(0.61; 0.85) |
| Fatal or non-fatal stroke5 |
178
(2.0%) |
160
(1.8%) |
0.89
(0.72; 1.11) |
*p-value < 0.001, one-sided p-value
1Primary endpoint
2Adjusted for group sequential design using the likelihood ratio ordering.
3Cardiovascular death was the first confirmatory secondary endpoint in the testing hierarchy and superiority was not confirmed.
4Confirmatory secondary endpoint. Not statistically significant based on the prespecified testing hierarchy.
5Not included in the prespecified testing hierarchy for controlling type-I error.
NOTE: Time to first event was analyzed in a Cox proportional hazards model with treatment as factor. For patients with multiple events, only the first event contributed to the composite endpoint. |
Table 6: Mean Changes in Anthropometry and Cardiometabolic Parameters at Week 104 in Study 11,2
|
PLACEBO |
WEGOVY |
Difference from Placebo (LSMean) |
| Baseline |
Change from Baseline (LSMean) |
Baseline |
Change from Baseline (LSMean) |
| Body Weight (kg) |
96.8 |
-0.93 |
96.5 |
-9.43 |
-8.53 |
| Waist Circumference (cm) |
111.4 |
-1.0 |
111.3 |
-7.6 |
-6.5 |
| Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) |
131 |
-0.5 |
131 |
-3.8 |
-3.3 |
| Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) |
79 |
-0.5 |
79 |
-1.0 |
-0.5 |
| Heart Rate |
69 |
0.7 |
69 |
3.8 |
3.1 |
| HbA1c (%) |
5.8 |
0.0 |
5.8 |
-0.3 |
-0.3 |
|
Baseline |
% Change from Baseline (LSMean) |
Baseline |
% Change from Baseline (LSMean) |
Relative difference from placebo (%) (LSMean) |
| Total Cholesterol (mg/dL)4 |
156.0 |
-1.9 |
155.5 |
-4.6 |
-2.8 |
| LDL Cholesterol (mg/dL)4 |
78.5 |
-3.1 |
78.5 |
-5.3 |
-2.2 |
| HDL Cholesterol (mg/dL)4 |
44.2 |
0.6 |
44.1 |
4.9 |
4.2 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL)4 |
139.5 |
-3.2 |
138.6 |
-18.3 |
-15.6 |
1Parameters listed in the table were not included in the pre-specified hierarchical testing.
2Responses were analysed using an ANCOVA with treatment as fixed factor and baseline value as covariate. Before analysis, missing data were multiple imputed. The imputation model (linear regression) was done separately for each treatment arm and included baseline value as a covariate and was fitted to all subjects with a measurement regardless of treatment status at week 104.
3For body weight the ‘change from baseline’ and ‘difference to placebo’ the unit is percentage change from baseline.
4Baseline value is the geometric mean. |
The reduction of MACE with WEGOVY was not impacted by age, sex, race, ethnicity, BMI at baseline, or level of renal function impairment.
Weight Reduction And Long-term Maintenance Studies In Adults With Obesity Or Overweight
Overview Of Clinical Studies In Adults
The safety and efficacy of WEGOVY for weight reduction and long-term maintenance of body weight in conjunction with a reduced calorie diet and increased physical activity were studied in three 68-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials; one 68-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo withdrawal trial; and one 68-week, randomized, double-blind trial that investigated 2 different doses of WEGOVY versus placebo. In Studies 2 (NCT#03548935), 3 (NCT#03552757), and 4 (NCT#03611582), WEGOVY or matching placebo was escalated to 2.4 mg subcutaneous weekly during a 16-week period followed by 52 weeks on maintenance dose. In Study 5 (NCT#03548987), WEGOVY was escalated during a 20-week run-in period, and patients who reached a WEGOVY 2.4 mg subcutaneous weekly dosage after the run-in period were randomized to either continued treatment with WEGOVY or placebo for 48 weeks. In Study 6 (NCT#03811574), WEGOVY was escalated to 1.7 mg or 2.4 mg subcutaneous weekly dosages or placebo over 12 to 16 weeks followed by 52 weeks on either maintenance dose.
In Studies 2, 3 and 5, all patients received instruction for a reduced calorie diet (approximately 500 kcal/day deficit) and increased physical activity counseling (recommended to a minimum of 150 min/week) that began with the first dose of study medication or placebo and continued throughout the trial. In Study 4, patients received an initial 8-week low-calorie diet (total energy intake 1,000 to 1,200 kcal/day) followed by 60 weeks of a reduced calorie diet(1200-1800 kcal/day) and increased physical activity (100 mins/week with gradual increase to 200 mins/week).
Study 2 was a 68-week trial that enrolled 1,961 patients with obesity (BMI greater than or equal to 30 kg/m²) or with overweight (BMI 27-29.9 kg/m²) and at least one weight-related comorbid condition, such as treated or untreated dyslipidemia or hypertension; patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were excluded. Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to either WEGOVY or placebo. At baseline, mean age was 46 years (range 18-86), 74% were female, 75% were White, 13% were Asian and 6% were Black or African American. A total of 12% were Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. Mean baseline body weight was 105.3 kg and mean BMI was 37.9 kg/m².
Study 3 was a 68-week trial that enrolled 807 patients with type 2 diabetes and BMI greater than or equal to 27 kg/m². Patients included in the trial had HbA1c 7-10% and were treated with either: diet and exercise alone or 1 to 3 oral anti-diabetic drugs (metformin, sulfonylurea, glitazone or sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor). Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either WEGOVY or placebo. At baseline, the mean age was 55 years (range 19-84), 51% were female, 62% were White, 26% were Asian and 8% were Black or African American. A total of 13% were Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. Mean baseline body weight was 99.8 kg and mean BMI was 35.7 kg/m².
Study 4 was a 68-week trial that enrolled 611 patients with obesity (BMI greater than or equal to 30 kg/m²) or with overweight (BMI 27-29.9 kg/m²) and at least one weight-related comorbid condition such as treated or untreated dyslipidemia or hypertension; patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were excluded. The patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either WEGOVY or placebo. At baseline, the mean age was 46 years, 81% were female, 76% were White, 19% were Black or African American and 2% were Asian. A total of 20% were Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. Mean baseline body weight was 105.8 kg and mean BMI was 38.0 kg/m².
Study 5 was a 68-week trial that enrolled 902 patients with obesity (BMI greater than or equal to 30 kg/m²) or with overweight (BMI 27-29.9 kg/m²) and at least one weight-related comorbid condition such as treated or untreated dyslipidemia or hypertension; patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were excluded. Mean body weight at baseline for the 902 patients was 106.8 kg and mean BMI was 38.3 kg/m². All patients received WEGOVY during the run-in period of 20 weeks that included 16 weeks of dose escalation. Trial product was permanently discontinued before randomization in 99 of 902 patients (11%); the most common reason was adverse reactions (n=48, 5.3%); 803 patients reached WEGOVY 2.4 mg and were then randomized in a 2:1 ratio to either continue on WEGOVY or receive placebo. Among the 803 randomized patients, the mean age was 46 years, 79% were female, 84% were White, 13% were Black or African American, and 2% Asian. A total of 8% were Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. Mean body weight at randomization (week 20) was 96.1 kg and mean BMI at randomization (week 20) was 34.4 kg/m².
Study 6 was a 68-week trial that enrolled 401 East-Asian patients (Japan and South Korea) with BMI greater than or equal to 35 kg/m² and at least one weight-related comorbid condition or with BMI 27-34.9 kg/m² and at least two weight-related comorbid conditions. The patients were randomized 2:1:1 to receive WEGOVY 2.4 mg, WEGOVY 1.7 mg, or placebo. At baseline, the mean age was 51 years, 63% were male, and all patients were Asian. Mean baseline body weight was 87.5 kg and mean BMI was 31.9 kg/m². At baseline, 24.7% of patients had type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Results
The proportions of patients who discontinued study drug in Studies 2, 3, and 4 was 16.0% for the WEGOVY-treated group and 19.1% for the placebo-treated group, and 6.8% of patients treated with WEGOVY and 3.2% of patients treated with placebo discontinued treatment due to an adverse reaction [see ADVERSE REACTIONS]. In Study 5, the proportions of patients who discontinued study drug were 5.8% and 11.6% for WEGOVY and placebo, respectively. In Study 6, the proportions of patients who discontinued study drug were 7.9%, 6.5%, and 3.0% for WEGOVY 1.7 mg, WEGOVY 2.4 mg, and placebo, respectively.
For Studies 2, 3 and 4, the primary efficacy parameters were mean percent change in body weight and the percentages of patients achieving greater than or equal to 5% weight loss from baseline to week 68.
After 68 weeks, treatment with WEGOVY resulted in a statistically significant reduction in body weight compared with placebo. Greater proportions of patients treated with WEGOVY achieved 5%, 10% and 15% weight loss than those treated with placebo as shown in Table 7.
Table 7: Changes in Body Weight at Week 68 in Studies 2, 3, and 4
| Intention-to-Treat1 |
Study 2 (Obesity or overweight with comorbidity) |
Study 3 (Type 2 diabetes with obesity or overweight) |
Study 4 (Obesity or overweight with comorbidity undergoing intensive lifestyle therapy) |
PLACEBO
N = 655 |
WEGOVY
N = 1306 |
PLACEBO
N = 403 |
WEGOVY
N = 404 |
PLACEBO
N = 204 |
WEGOVY
N = 407 |
| Baseline mean (kg) |
105.2 |
105.4 |
100.5 |
99.9 |
103.7 |
106.9 |
% change from baseline
(LSMean) |
-2.4 |
-14.9 |
-3.4 |
-9.6 |
-5.7 |
-16.0 |
% difference from placebo
(LSMean) (95% CI) |
|
-12.4
(-13.3; -11.6)* |
|
-6.2
(-7.3; -5.2)* |
|
-10.3
(-11.8; -8.7)* |
| % of Patients losing greater than or equal to 5% body weight |
31.1 |
83.5 |
30.2 |
67.4 |
47.8 |
84.8 |
% difference from placebo
(LSMean) (95% CI) |
|
52.4
(48.1; 56.7)* |
|
37.2
(30.7; 43.8)* |
|
37.0
(28.9; 45.2)* |
| % of Patients losing greater than or equal to 10% body weight |
12.0 |
66.1 |
10.2 |
44.5 |
27.1 |
73.0 |
% difference from placebo
(LSMean) (95% CI) |
|
54.1
(50.4; 57.9)* |
|
34.3
(28.4; 40.2)* |
|
45.9
(38.0; 53.7)* |
| % of Patients losing greater than or equal to 15% body weight |
4.8 |
47.9 |
4.3 |
25.1 |
13.2 |
53.4 |
% difference from placebo
(LSMean) (95% CI) |
|
43.1
(39.8; 46.3)* |
|
20.7
(15.7; 25.8)* |
|
40.2
(33.1; 47.3)* |
LSMean = least squares mean; CI = confidence interval
1The intent-to-treat population includes all randomized patients. In Study 2, at week 68, the body weight was missing for 7.2% and 11.9% of patients randomized to WEGOVY and placebo, respectively. In Study 3, at week 68, the body weight was missing for 4.0% and 6.7% of patients randomized to WEGOVY and placebo, respectively. In Study 4, at week 68, the body weight was missing for 8.4% and 7.4% of patients randomized to WEGOVY and placebo, respectively. Missing data were imputed from retrieved subjects of the same randomized treatment arm (RD-MI).
* p<0.0001 (unadjusted 2-sided) for superiority. |
For Study 5, the primary efficacy parameter was mean percent change in body weight from randomization (week 20) to week 68.
From randomization (week 20) to week 68, treatment with WEGOVY resulted in a statistically significant reduction in body weight compared with placebo (Table 8). Because patients who discontinued WEGOVY during titration and those who did not reach the 2.4 mg weekly dose were not eligible for the randomized treatment period, the results may not reflect the experience of patients in the general population who are first starting WEGOVY.
Table 8: Changes in Body Weight at Week 68 in Study 5 (Obesity or overweight with comorbidity after 20 week run-in)
|
WEGOVY
N = 8031 |
| Body Weight (only randomized patients) |
|
| Mean at week 0 (kg) |
107.2 |
|
PLACEBO
N = 268 |
WEGOVY
N = 535 |
| Body Weight |
| Mean at week 20 (SD) (kg) |
95.4 (22.7) |
96.5 (22.5) |
| % change from week 20 at week 68 (LSMean) |
6.9 |
-7.9 |
| % difference from placebo (LSMean) (95% CI) |
|
-14.8
(-16.0; -13.5)* |
LSMean = least squares mean; CI = confidence interval
1902 patients were enrolled at week 0 with a mean baseline body weight of 106.8 kg. The intent-to-treat population includes all randomized patients. At week 68, the body weight was missing for 2.8% and 6.7% of patients randomized to WEGOVY and placebo, respectively. Missing data were imputed from retrieved subjects of the same randomized treatment arm (RD-MI).
*p<0.001 (unadjusted 2-sided) for superiority, controlled for multiplicity. |
For Study 6, the primary efficacy parameters were mean percent change in body weight and the percentage of patients achieving greater than or equal to 5% weight loss from baseline to week 68.
After 68 weeks, treatment with WEGOVY 1.7 mg and 2.4 mg resulted in a statistically significant reduction in body weight compared with placebo. Greater proportions of patients treated with WEGOVY achieved 5%, 10%, and 15% weight loss than those treated with placebo as shown in Table 9.
Table 9: Changes in Body Weight at Week 68 in Study 6 in East-Asian Patients (WEGOVY 1.7 mg)
| Intention-to-treat1 |
Study 6 (BMI ≥35 kg/m² with at least one comorbidity or BMI 27-34.9 kg/m² with at least two comorbidities) |
PLACEBO
N = 101 |
WEGOVY 1.7 mg
N = 101 |
WEGOVY 2.4 mg
N = 199 |
| Body Weight |
| Baseline mean (kg) |
90.2 |
86.1 |
86.9 |
| % change from baseline (LSMean) |
-2.1 |
-9.6 |
-13.2 |
| % difference from placebo (LSMean) (95% CI) |
|
-7.5
(-9.6;-5.4)* |
-11.1
(-12.9; -9.2)* |
| % of Patients losing greater than or equal to 5% body weight |
19.4 |
72.8 |
84.0 |
| % difference from placebo (LSMean) (95% CI) |
|
53.3
(41.0; 65.6)* |
64.5
(54.8; 74.3)* |
| % of Patients losing greater than or equal to 10% body weight |
4.5 |
39.1 |
59.9 |
| % difference from placebo (LSMean) (95% CI) |
|
34.5
(23.9; 45.1)* |
55.4
(47.3; 63.6)* |
| % of Patients losing greater than or equal to 15% body weight |
2.6 |
20.8 |
38.2 |
| % difference from placebo (LSMean) (95% CI) |
|
18.2
(9.8; 26.7)* |
35.6
(27.9; 43.3)* |
LSMean = least squares mean; CI = confidence interval
1The intent-to-treat population includes all randomized patients. At baseline, 24.7% of patients had type 2 diabetes mellitus. At week 68, the body weight was missing for 3%, 3%, and 1% of patients randomized to WEGOVY 1.7 mg, WEGOVY 2.4 mg, and placebo, respectively. Missing data were imputed from retrieved subjects of the same randomized treatment arm (RD-MI).
*p<0.0001 (unadjusted 2-sided) for superiority. |
A reduction in body weight was observed with WEGOVY irrespective of age, sex, race, ethnicity, BMI at baseline, body weight (kg) at baseline, and level of renal function impairment.
The cumulative frequency distributions of change in body weight are shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6 for Studies 2 and 3. One way to interpret this figure is to select a change in body weight of interest on the horizontal axis and note the corresponding proportions of patients (vertical axis) in each treatment group who achieved at least that degree of weight loss. For example, note that the vertical line arising from -10% in Study 2 intersects the WEGOVY and placebo curves at approximately 66%, and 12%, respectively, which correspond to the values shown in Table 7.
Figure 5: Change in body weight (%) from baseline to week 68 (Study 2)
Observed data from in-trial period including imputed data for missing observations (RD-MI).
Figure 6: Change in body weight (%) from baseline to week 68 (Study 3)
Observed data from in-trial period including imputed data for missing observations (RD-MI).
The time courses of weight loss with WEGOVY and placebo from baseline through week 68 are depicted in Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9.
Figure 7: Change from baseline (%) in body weight (Study 2 on left and Study 3 on right)
Observed values for patients completing each scheduled visit, and estimates with multiple imputations from retrieved dropouts (RD-MI)
Figure 8: Change from baseline (%) in body weight (Study 4 on left and Study 5a on right)
Observed values for patients completing each scheduled visit, and estimates with multiple imputations from retrieved dropouts (RD-MI)
aChange from week 0 was not a primary endpoint in study 5. Dotted line indicates time of randomization. Randomized patients (shown) do not include 99 patients that discontinued during the 20 week run-in period.
Figure 9: Change in body weight (%) from baseline to week 68 (Study 6 in East-Asian Patients)
Observed values for patients completing each scheduled visit and estimates with multiple imputations from retrieved dropouts (RDÂMI). At baseline, 24.7% of patients had type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Effect Of WEGOVY On Anthropometry And Cardiometabolic Parameters In Adults
Changes in waist circumference and cardiometabolic parameters with WEGOVY are shown in Table 10 for Studies 2, 3, and 4; in Table 11 for Study 5; and in Table 12 for Study 6.
Table 10: Changes in Anthropometry and Cardiometabolic Parameters at Week 68 in Studies 2, 3, and 4
| Intention-to-Treat |
Study 2 (Obesity or overweight with comorbidity) |
Study 3 (Type 2 diabetes with obesity or overweight) |
Study 4 (Obesity or overweight with comorbidity undergoing intensive lifestyle therapy) |
PLACEBO
N = 655 |
WEGOVY
N = 1306 |
PLACEBO
N = 403 |
WEGOVY
N = 404 |
PLACEBO
N = 204 |
WEGOVY
N = 407 |
| Waist Circumference (cm) |
| Baseline |
114.8 |
114.6 |
115.5 |
114.5 |
111.8 |
113.6 |
| Changes from baseline (LSMean1) |
-4.1 |
-13.5 |
-4.5 |
-9.4 |
-6.3 |
-14.6 |
| Difference from placebo (LSMean) |
|
-9.4 |
|
-4.9 |
|
-8.3 |
| Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) |
| Baseline |
127 |
126 |
130 |
130 |
124 |
124 |
| Changes from baseline (LSMean1) |
-1.1 |
-6.2 |
-0.5 |
-3.9 |
-1.6 |
-5.6 |
| Difference from placebo (LSMean) |
|
-5.1 |
|
-3.4 |
|
-3.9 |
| Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)2 |
| Baseline |
80 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
81 |
80 |
| Changes from baseline (LSMean1) |
-0.4 |
-2.8 |
-0.9 |
-1.6 |
-0.8 |
-3.0 |
| Difference from placebo (LSMean) |
|
-2.4 |
|
-0.7 |
|
-2.2 |
| Heart Rate2,3 |
| Baseline |
72 |
72 |
76 |
75 |
71 |
71 |
| Changes from baseline (LSMean) |
-0.7 |
3.5 |
-0.2 |
2.5 |
2.1 |
3.1 |
| Difference from placebo (LSMean) |
|
4.3 |
|
2.7 |
|
1.0 |
| HbA1c (%)2 |
| Baseline |
5.7 |
5.7 |
8.1 |
8.1 |
5.8 |
5.7 |
| Changes from baseline (LSMean1) |
-0.2 |
-0.4 |
-0.4 |
-1.6 |
-0.3 |
-0.5 |
| Difference from placebo (LSMean) |
|
-0.3 |
|
-1.2 |
|
-0.2 |
| Total Cholesterol (mg/dL)2,4 |
| Baseline |
192.1 |
189.6 |
170.8 |
170.8 |
188.7 |
185.4 |
| Percent Change from baseline (LSMean1) |
0.1 |
-3.3 |
-0.5 |
-1.4 |
2.1 |
-3.9 |
| Relative difference from placebo (LSMean) |
|
-3.3 |
|
-0.9 |
|
-5.8 |
| LDL Cholesterol (mg/dL)2,4 |
| Baseline |
112.5 |
110.3 |
90.1 |
90.1 |
111.8 |
107.7 |
| Percent Change from baseline (LSMean1) |
1.3 |
-2.5 |
0.1 |
0.5 |
2.6 |
-4.7 |
| Relative difference from placebo (LSMean) |
|
-3.8 |
|
0.4 |
|
-7.1 |
| HDL (mg/dL)2,4 |
| Baseline |
49.5 |
49.4 |
43.8 |
44.7 |
50.9 |
51.6 |
| Percent Change from baseline (LSMean1) |
1.4 |
5.2 |
4.1 |
6.9 |
5.0 |
6.5 |
| Relative difference from placebo (LSMean) |
|
3.8 |
|
2.7 |
|
1.5 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL)2,4 |
| Baseline |
127.9 |
126.2 |
159.5 |
154.9 |
110.9 |
107.9 |
| Percent Change from baseline (LSMean1) |
-7.3 |
-21.9 |
-9.4 |
-22.0 |
-6.5 |
-22.5 |
| Relative difference from placebo (LSMean) |
|
-15.8 |
|
-13.9 |
|
-17.0 |
Missing data were imputed from retrieved subjects of the same randomized treatment arm (RD-MI)
1Model based estimates based on an analysis of covariance model including treatment (and stratification factors for Study 3 only) as a factor and baseline value as a covariate
2Not included in the pre-specified hierarchical testing (except HbA1c for Study 3)
3Model based estimates based on a mixed model for repeated measures including treatment (and stratification factors for Study 3 only) as a factor and baseline values as a covariate
4Baseline value is the geometric mean |
Table 11: Mean Changes in Anthropometry and Cardiometabolic Parameters in Study 5 (Obesity or overweight with comorbidity after 20 week run-in)1
|
PLACEBO
N = 268 |
WEGOVY
N = 535 |
Difference from placebo (LSMean) |
| Randomization (week 20) |
Change from Randomization (week 20) to week 68 (LSMean1) |
Randomization (week 20) |
Change from Randomization (week 20) to week 68 (LSMean1) |
| Waist Circumference (cm) |
104.7 |
3.3 |
105.5 |
-6.4 |
-9.7 |
| Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) |
121 |
4.4 |
121 |
0.5 |
-3.9 |
| Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)2 |
78 |
0.9 |
78 |
0.3 |
-0.5 |
| Heart Rate2,3 |
76 |
-5.3 |
76 |
-2.0 |
3.3 |
| HbA1c (%)2 |
5.4 |
0.1 |
5.4 |
-0.1 |
-0.2 |
|
Randomization (week 20) |
% Change from Randomization (week 20) (LSMean1) |
Randomization (week 20) |
% Change from Randomization (week 20) (LSMean1) |
Relative difference from placebo (LSMean) |
| Total Cholesterol (mg/dL)2,4 |
175.1 |
11.4 |
175.9 |
4.9 |
-5.8 |
| LDL Cholesterol (mg/dL)2,4 |
109.1 |
7.6 |
108.7 |
1.1 |
-6.1 |
| HDL Cholesterol (mg/dL)2,4 |
43.6 |
17.8 |
44.5 |
18.2 |
0.3 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL)2,4 |
95.3 |
14.8 |
98.1 |
-5.6 |
-17.8 |
Missing data were imputed from retrieved subjects of the same randomized treatment arm (RD-MI)
1Model based estimates based on an analysis of covariance model including treatment as a factor and baseline value as a covariate
2Not included in the pre-specified hierarchical testing
3Model based estimates based on a mixed model for repeated measures including treatment as a factor and baseline values as a covariate
4Baseline value is the geometric mean |
Table 12: Mean Changes in Anthropometry and Cardiometabolic Parameters at Week 68 in Study 6 in East-Asian Patients (WEGOVY 1.7 mg)
| Intention-to-treat |
Study 6 (BMI ≥35 kg/m² with at least one comorbidity or BMI 27-34.9 kg/m² with at least two comorbidities) |
PLACEBO
N = 101 |
WEGOVY 1.7 mg
N = 101 |
WEGOVY 2.4 mg
N = 199 |
| Waist circumference (cm) Baseline |
103.8 |
101.4 |
103.8 |
| Change from baseline (LSMean1) |
-1.8 |
-7.7 |
-11.0 |
| Difference from placebo (LSMean) |
|
-5.9 |
-9.3 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)2 |
| Baseline |
133 |
135 |
133 |
| Change from baseline (LSMean1) |
-5.3 |
-10.8 |
-10.8 |
| Difference from placebo (LSMean) |
|
-5.4 |
-5.5 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)2 |
| Baseline |
86 |
85 |
83 |
| Change from baseline (LSMean1) |
-2.2 |
-4.6 |
-5.3 |
| Difference from placebo (LSMean) |
|
-2.4 |
-3.1 |
| Heart Rate2, 3 |
| Baseline |
73 |
73 |
73 |
| Change from baseline (LSMean) |
2.4 |
4.4 |
6.3 |
| Difference from placebo (LSMean) |
|
2.0 |
3.9 |
| HbA1C (%)2 |
| Baseline |
6.4 |
6.4 |
6.4 |
| Change from baseline (LSMean1) |
0.0 |
-0.9 |
-0.9 |
| Difference from placebo (LSMean) |
|
-0.9 |
-0.9 |
| Total Cholesterol (mg/dL)2,4 |
| Baseline |
203.1 |
203.3 |
197.2 |
| Percent change from baseline (LSMean1) |
0.8 |
-6.6 |
-8.7 |
| Relative difference from placebo (LSMean) |
|
-7.3 |
-9.4 |
| LDL Cholesterol (mg/dL)2,4 |
| Baseline |
123.3 |
120.1 |
116.5 |
| Percent change from baseline (LSMean1) |
-3.8 |
-10.1 |
-14.6 |
| Relative difference from placebo (LSMean) |
|
-6.5 |
-11.2 |
| HDL Cholesterol (mg/dL)2,4 |
| Baseline |
48.7 |
50.2 |
50.8 |
| Percent change from baseline (LSMean1) |
5.9 |
6.7 |
9.2 |
| Relative difference from placebo (LSMean) |
|
0.7 |
3.1 |
| Triglyceride (mg/dL)2,4 |
| Baseline |
134.2 |
138.8 |
127.1 |
| Percent change from baseline (LSMean1) |
5.5 |
-19.5 |
-21.2 |
| Relative difference from placebo (LSMean) |
|
-23.7 |
-25.3 |
Missing data were imputed from retrieved subjects of the same randomized treatment arm (RD-MI). At baseline, 24.7% of patients had type 2 diabetes mellitus.
1Model based estimates based on an analysis of covariance model including treatment and type 2 diabetes status as factors and baseline value as a covariate
2Not included in the pre-specified hierarchical testing
3Model based estimates based on a mixed model for repeated measures including treatment and type 2 diabetes status as factors and baseline values as a covariate
4Baseline value is the geometric mean |
Weight Reduction And Long-Term Maintenance Study In Pediatric Patients Aged 12 Years And Older With Obesity
Overview Of Clinical Trial In Pediatric Patients
WEGOVY was evaluated in a 68-week, double-blind, randomized, parallel group, placebo-controlled, multi-center trial in 201 pubertal pediatric patients aged 12 years and older with BMI corresponding to ≥95th percentile standardized for age and sex (Study 7) (NCT#04102189). After a 12-week lifestyle run-in period (including dietary recommendations and physical activity counseling), patients were randomized 2:1 to WEGOVY once weekly or placebo once weekly. WEGOVY or matching placebo was escalated to 2.4 mg or maximally tolerated dose during a 16-week period followed by 52 weeks on maintenance dose. Of WEGOVY-treated patients who completed the trial, 86.7% were on the 2.4 mg dose at the end of the trial; for 5% of patients, 1.7 mg was the maximum tolerated dose.
The mean age was 15 years; 38% of patients were male; 79% were White, 8% were Black or African American, 2% were Asian, and 11% were of other or unknown race; and 11% were of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. The mean baseline body weight was 108 kg, and mean BMI was 37 kg/m².
Results
The proportions of patients who discontinued study drug were 10% for the WEGOVY-treated group and 10% for the placebo-treated group.
The primary endpoint was percent change in BMI from baseline to week 68. After 68 weeks, treatment with WEGOVY resulted in a statistically significant reduction in percent BMI compared with placebo. Greater proportions of patients treated with WEGOVY achieved ≥5% reduction in baseline BMI than those treated with placebo as shown in Table 13.
Table 13: Changes in Weight and BMI at Week 68 in Pediatric Patients with Obesity Aged 12 Years and Older in Study 7
| Intention-to-Treata |
PLACEBO
N = 67 |
WEGOVY
N = 134 |
| BMI |
| Baseline mean (kg/m²) |
35.7 |
37.7 |
| % change from baseline in BMI (LSMean) |
0.6 |
-16.1 |
| % difference from placebo (LSMean) (95% CI) |
|
-16.7 (-20.3; -13.2)* |
| % of Patients with greater than or equal to 5% reduction in baseline BMIb |
19.7 |
77.1 |
| % difference from placebo (LSMean) |
|
57.4 |
| % of Patients with greater than or equal to 10% reduction in baseline BMIb |
7.7 |
65.1 |
| % difference from placebo (LSMean) |
|
57.5 |
| % of Patients with greater than or equal to 15% reduction in baseline BMIb |
4.0 |
57.8 |
| % difference from placebo (LSMean) |
|
53.9 |
| Body Weightb |
| Baseline mean (kg) |
102.6 |
109.9 |
| % change from baseline (LSMean)a |
2.7 |
-14.7 |
| % difference from placebo (LSMean) |
|
-17.4 |
LSMean = least squares mean; CI = confidence interval
aThe intention-to-treat population includes all randomized patients. Missing data were imputed using available data according to value and timing of last available observation on treatment and endpoint’s baseline value from retrieved subjects (RD-MI). At week 68, the BMI was missing for 2.2% and 7.5% of patients randomized to WEGOVY and placebo, respectively.
bParameters not included in the pre-specified hierarchical testing.
* p<0.0001 (unadjusted 2-sided) for superiority. |
The time course of change in BMI with WEGOVY and placebo from baseline through week 68 is depicted in Figure 10. The cumulative frequency distribution of change in BMI is shown in Figure 11.
Figure 10:Change from Baseline (%) in BMI in Pediatric Patients with Obesity Aged 12 Years and Older in Study 7
Observed values for patients completing each scheduled visit, and estimates with multiple imputations from retrieved dropouts (RD-MI)
Figure 11: Change in BMI (%) from Baseline to Week 68 in Pediatric Patients with Obesity Aged 12 Years and Older in Study 7
Observed data from in-trial period including imputed data for missing observations (RD-MI)
Effect Of WEGOVY On Anthropometry And Cardiometabolic Parameters In Pediatric Patients With Obesity Aged 12 Years and Older
Changes in waist circumference and cardiometabolic parameters with WEGOVY are shown in Table 14 for the study in pediatric patients aged 12 years and older.
Table 14: Mean Changes in Anthropometry and Cardiometabolic Parameters in Pediatric Patients with Obesity Aged 12 Years and Older in Study 71
|
PLACEBO N = 67 |
WEGOVY N = 134 |
Difference from placebo (LSMean) |
| Baseline |
Change from Baseline (LSMean) |
Baseline |
Change from Baseline (LSMean) |
| Waist Circumference (cm)2 |
107.3 |
-0.6 |
111.9 |
-12.7 |
-12.1 |
| Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)2 |
120 |
-0.8 |
120 |
-2.7 |
-1.9 |
| Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)2 |
73 |
-0.8 |
73 |
-1.4 |
-0.6 |
| Heart Rate3 |
76 |
-2.3 |
79 |
1.2 |
3.5 |
| HbAlc (%)2 4 |
5.4 |
-0.1 |
5.5 |
-0.4 |
-0.2 |
|
Baseline |
% Change from Baseline (LSMean) |
Baseline |
% Change from Baseline (LSMean) |
Relative difference from placebo (LSMean) |
| Total Cholesterol (mg/dL)2,5 |
160.1 |
-1.3 |
159.4 |
-8.3 |
-7.1 |
| LDL Cholesterol (mg/dL)2,5 |
91.7 |
-3.6 |
89.8 |
-9.9 |
-6.6 |
| HDL Cholesterol (mg/dL)2,5 |
43.3 |
3.2 |
43.7 |
8.0 |
4.7 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL)2,5 |
108.0 |
2.6 |
111.3 |
-28.4 |
-30.2 |
1Parameters listed in the table were not included in the pre-specified hierarchical testing.
2Missing data were imputed using available data according to value and timing of last available observation on treatment and endpoint’s baseline value from retrieved subjects (RD-MI). Model based estimates based on an analysis of covariance model including treatment and stratification groups (gender, Tanner stage group) and the interaction between stratification groups as factors and baseline value as a covariate.
3Model based estimates based on a mixed model for repeated measures including treatment as a factor and baseline value as a covariate all nested within visit.
4For patients without type 2 diabetes at randomization (N=129 for WEGOVY-treated patients and N=64 for placebo-treated patients).
5Baseline value is the geometric mean. |