Clinical Pharmacology for Wakix
Mechanism Of Action
The mechanism of action of pitolisant in excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) or cataplexy in patients 6 years and older with narcolepsy is unclear. However, its efficacy could be mediated through its activity as an antagonist/inverse agonist at histamine-3 (H3) receptors.
Pharmacodynamics
Pitolisant binds to H3 receptors with a high affinity (Ki = 1 nM) and has no appreciable binding to other histamine receptors (H1, H2, or H4 receptors; Ki >10 μM).
Cardiac Electrophysiology
WAKIX at the highest recommended dosage (i.e., 35.6 mg daily) led to a QTc increase of 4.2 msec. Exposures 3.8-fold higher than achieved at the highest recommended dose increased QTc 16 msec (mean) [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS].
Pharmacokinetics
Following oral administration of pitolisant 35.6 mg once daily, the steady state Cmax and AUC are 73 ng/mL (range: 49.2 to 126 ng/mL) and 812 ng*hr/mL (range: 518 to 1468 ng*hr/mL), respectively. Pitolisant exposure (Cmax and AUC) increases proportionally with dose and steady state is reached by day 7.
Absorption
The median time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) of pitolisant is 3.5 hours (2 to 5 hours). The oral absorption of WAKIX is around 90%.
Food Effect
No clinically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of pitolisant were observed following administration with a high-fat meal (approximately 950 calories, 62% fat).
Distribution
The apparent volume of distribution of pitolisant is approximately 700 L (5 to 10 L/kg). Serum protein binding is approximately 91% to 96%. The blood to plasma ratio of pitolisant is 0.55 to 0.89.
Elimination
After a single dose of 35.6 mg, the median half-life of pitolisant is approximately 20 hours (7.5 to 24.2 hours). The apparent oral clearance (CL/F) of pitolisant is 43.9 L/hr and renal clearance accounts for <2% of the total clearance of pitolisant.
Metabolism
Pitolisant is primarily metabolized by CYP2D6 and to a lesser extent by CYP3A4; these metabolites are further metabolized or conjugated with glycine or glucuronic acid. None of these metabolites are pharmacologically active.
Excretion
After a single oral radiolabeled pitolisant 17.8 mg dose, approximately 90% of the dose was excreted in urine (<2% unchanged) and 2.3% in feces.
Specific Populations
No clinically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of pitolisant were observed based on age (18 to 82 years old), sex, race/ethnicity (Caucasians or Blacks), or body weight (48 to 103 kg). The effects of end-stage renal disease and severe hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of pitolisant are unknown.
Pediatric Patients
Pharmacokinetic data from 24 pediatric patients with narcolepsy (ages 7 to 17 years) receiving a single dose of WAKIX suggest that pediatric patients have higher exposure to pitolisant than adults. The geometric mean Cmax and AUC0-10h of pitolisant were 2.2 and 2.0-fold higher, respectively, in pediatric patients 12 to 17 years and 3.4 and 3.6-fold higher, respectively, in pediatric patients 7 to 11 years compared to adults.
Patients With Hepatic Impairment
Six subjects with mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh A), 6 subjects with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh B), and 12 healthy subjects matched for age, sex, body mass index and ethnicity received a single dose of WAKIX 17.8 mg to assess the pharmacokinetics of WAKIX in
Hepatic
Impairment
Change Relative to Reference (Healthy Volunteer) patients with hepatic impairment. Exposure of pitolisant in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment is summarized in Figure 1. No studies have been conducted in patients with severe hepatic impairment.
Figure 1: Effect of Hepatic Impairment on Pitolisant Pharmacokinetics
Patients with Renal Impairment
A single dose of WAKIX 17.8 mg was administered to 4 subjects with mild renal impairment (eGFR of 60 to 89 mL/min/1.73 m2), 4 subjects with moderate renal impairment (eGFR of 30 to 59 mL/min/1.73 m2), 4 subjects with severe renal impairment (eGFR of 15 to 29 mL/min/1.73 m2), and 12 subjects with normal renal function (i.e., eGFR >90 mL/min/1.73 m2) to assess the pharmacokinetics of WAKIX in patients with renal impairment. Exposure of pitolisant in patients with mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment is summarized in Figure 2. No studies have been conducted in patients with ESRD.
Figure 2: Effect of Renal Impairment on Pitolisant Pharmacokinetics
 |
Dots = Geometric least square mean ratios, Error bars = 90% CI; reference dashed lines are 0.8 and 1.25.
AUCinf = area under the curve from time 0 to time infinity; Cmax = maximum plasma concentration. |
Drug-Drug Interactions
Effect Of Other Drugs On The Pharmacokinetics Of WAKIX
The effect of other drugs on the pharmacokinetics of pitolisant is presented in Figure 3 [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION, Drug Interactions].
Figure 3: Effect of Concomitant Medications on Pitolisant
 |
Dots = Geometric least square mean ratios, Error bars = 90% CI; reference dashed lines are 0.8 and 1.25.
AUCinf = area under the curve from time 0 to time infinity; Cmax = maximum plasma concentration. |
Effect of WAKIX on the Pharmacokinetics of Other Drugs
The effect of pitolisant on the pharmacokinetics of other drugs is presented in Figure 4 [see DRUG INTERACTIONS, Use In Specific Populations].
Figure 4: Effect of Pitolisant on Concomitant Medications
 |
Dots = Geometric least square mean ratios, Error bars = 90% CI; reference dashed lines are 0.8 and 1.25.
AUCinf = area under the curve from time 0 to time infinity; AUC0-24 = area under the curve from time 0 to 24 hours; Cmax = maximum plasma concentration. |
Pharmacogenomics
Pitolisant is metabolized by CYP2D6. The gene encoding CYP2D6 has variants that affect CYP2D6 metabolic function. CYP2D6 poor metabolizers are individuals with two nonfunctional alleles (e.g., CYP2D6*5/*5), and as a result have no CYP2D6 enzyme activity.
Administration of WAKIX 17.8 mg daily for 7 days resulted in 2.4 times higher AUC and 2.1 times higher Cmax in CYP2D6 poor metabolizers (n=3) compared to CYP2D6 normal metabolizers (n=5).
Animal Toxicology And/Or Pharmacology
Adverse CNS-related clinical signs including tremors and convulsions occurred after single and repeated oral administration of pitolisant across multiple species. In a 9-month repeat-dose toxicity study in adult monkeys, sporadic incidences of convulsions occurred at doses corresponding to exposures approximately 3 times the MRHD based on Cmax and 1 times the MRHD, based on AUC. Convulsions were first observed close to Tmax and resolved by 2 hours after dosing. Convulsions were not observed after discontinuation of dosing and were not associated with microscopic findings in the brain. Safety margins at the no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) correspond to 1 times the MRHD based on Cmax and 0.4 times based on AUC.
Clinical Studies
Excessive Daytime Sleepiness (EDS) In Patients With Narcolepsy
Adult Patients With Narcolepsy
The efficacy of WAKIX for the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness in adult patients with narcolepsy was evaluated in two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (Study 1; NCT01067222 and Study 2; NCT01638403). Patients ≥18 years of age who met the International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD-2) criteria for narcolepsy (with or without cataplexy) and who had an Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score ≥14 were eligible to enroll in the studies. EDS was assessed using the ESS, an 8-item questionnaire by which patients rate their perceived likelihood of falling asleep during usual daily life activities. Each of the 8 items on the ESS is rated from 0 (would never doze) to 3 (high chance of dozing); the maximum score is 24. Study 1 and Study 2 included an 8-week treatment period: a 3-week dose titration phase followed by a 5-week stable dose phase. These studies compared WAKIX to both a placebo and an active control.
In Study 1, 95 patients were randomized to receive WAKIX, placebo, or active control. The dose of WAKIX was initiated at 8.9 mg once daily and could be increased at weekly intervals to 17.8 mg or 35.6 mg, based on clinical response and tolerability. No dose adjustments were permitted during the 5-week stable dose phase. 61% of patients reached a stable dose of 35.6 mg. Median age in the study was 37 years. More than 90% of patients in the WAKIX and placebo groups were Caucasian and 54% were male. Approximately 80% of the population had a history of cataplexy.
WAKIX demonstrated statistically significantly greater improvement on the primary endpoint, the least square mean final ESS score compared to placebo (Table 3).
In Study 2, 166 patients were randomized to receive WAKIX, placebo, or active control. The dose of WAKIX was initiated at 4.45 mg and could be increased at weekly intervals to 8.9 mg or 17.8 mg, based on clinical response and tolerability. No dose adjustments were permitted during the 5-week stable-dose phase. 76% of patients reached a stable dose of 17.8 mg. Median age in the study was 40 years. In the WAKIX and placebo groups, approximately 50% of patients were male, 90% of patients were Caucasian, and 75% of patients had a history of cataplexy.
WAKIX demonstrated statistically significantly greater improvement on the primary endpoint, the least square mean final ESS score compared to placebo (Table 3).
Examination of demographic subgroups by sex did not suggest differences in response.
The efficacy results from Study 1 and Study 2 are shown in Table 3.
Table 3: Efficacy Results for Epworth Sleepiness Scale in Adult Patients with Narcolepsy (Study 1 and Study 2)
| Study |
Treatment Group (N) |
Baseline ESS Score Mean (SD) |
Final ESS Scorec LS Mean
at Week 8 (SE) |
Placebo Subtracted Difference [95% CI at Week 8d |
| Study 1a |
WAKIX (n=31) |
17.8 (2.5) |
12.4 (1.01) |
-3.1
[-5.73; -0.46] |
| Placebo (n=30) |
18.9 (2.5) |
15.5 (1.03) |
| Study 2b |
WAKIX (n=66) |
18.3 (2.4) |
13.3 (1.19) |
-2.2
[-4.17; -0.22] |
| Placebo (n=32) |
18.2 (2.3) |
15.5 (1.32) |
CI = confidence interval; LS Mean = least square mean; SD = standard deviation; SE = standard error
a Maximum dose randomized to was 35.6 mg.
bMaximum dose randomized to was 17.8 mg.
c A lower score on the ESS represents improvement; scores range from 0 (no symptoms) to 24 (worst symptoms).
dA negative value for the placebo subtracted difference represents improvement. |
Figure 5: Epworth Sleepiness Scale Score (mean ± SEM) from Baseline to Week 8 in Study 1
 |
SEM = standard error of the mean (raw mean scores)
ESS scores range from 0 to 24, with 0 being the best score and 24 being the worst score. |
Pediatric Patients (6 Years Of Age And Older) With Narcolepsy
The efficacy of WAKIX for the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness in pediatric patients 6 years of age and older with narcolepsy was evaluated in one multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (Study 4; NCT02611687). Pediatric patients 6 to 17 years who met the International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD-3) criteria for narcolepsy (with or without cataplexy) and who had a Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS) score ≥15 were eligible to enroll in the study. EDS was assessed with the PDSS, an 8-item questionnaire in which patients report their frequency of EDS-related symptoms. Each of the 8 items on the PDSS is rated from 0 (never) to 4 (very often, always); the maximum score is 32, with higher scores representing greater severity of symptoms. The study included an 8-week treatment period: a 4-week dose titration phase followed by a 4-week stable dose phase.
In Study 4, 110 pediatric patients 6 to 17 years were randomized to receive WAKIX or placebo. The dose of WAKIX was initiated at 4.45 mg once daily and could be increased at weekly intervals to 17.8 mg for patients weighing <40 kg or 35.6 mg for patients weighing ≥40 kg, based on clinical response and tolerability. No dose adjustments were permitted during the 4-week stable dose phase. 69% of patients weighing <40 kg reached a stable dose of 17.8 mg and 72% of patients weighing ≥40 kg reached a stable dose of 35.6 mg. Median age in the study was 13 years, 56% of the patients were male, and 82% of the population had a history of cataplexy. Race and ethnicity were not collected in this study.
WAKIX demonstrated statistically significantly greater improvement on the least square mean change from baseline to the end of treatment in final PDSS total score compared to placebo, of -3.41 points (95% CI: -5.52, -1.31). Study 4 included global assessments, which showed positive trends supporting PDSS total score of improvement in favor of WAKIX.
Cataplexy In Patients With Narcolepsy
Adult Patients with Narcolepsy
The efficacy of WAKIX for the treatment of cataplexy in adult patients with narcolepsy was evaluated in two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (Study 3; NCT01800045 and Study 1; NCT01067222). Patients ≥18 years of age who met the International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD-2) criteria for narcolepsy with cataplexy with at least 3 cataplexy attacks per week and an ESS score of ≥12 were eligible to enroll in Study 3; patients meeting the ICSD-2 criteria for narcolepsy (with or without cataplexy) and an ESS score of ≥14 were eligible to enroll in Study 1.
Study 3 included a 7-week treatment period: a 3-week dose titration phase followed by a 4-week stable dose phase. 105 patients were randomized to receive WAKIX or placebo. The dose of WAKIX was initiated at 4.45 mg once daily for the first week, increased to 8.9 mg for the second week, and could remain the same or be decreased or increased at the next two weekly intervals to a maximum of 35.6 mg, based on clinical response and tolerability. No dose adjustments were permitted during the 4-week stable dose phase. 65% of patients reached a stable dose of 35.6 mg. Median age in the study was 37 years and 51% of the patients were male. Race was not collected in this study.
WAKIX demonstrated statistically significantly greater improvement on the primary endpoint, the change in geometric mean number of cataplexy attacks per week from baseline to the average of the 4-week stable dosing period for WAKIX compared to placebo (Table 4).
Study 1 was described in Section 14.1. In the subset of patients with a history of cataplexy (n=49), WAKIX demonstrated statistically significantly greater improvement on the secondary endpoint, the change from baseline in geometric mean daily rate of cataplexy at Week 8 for WAKIX compared to placebo (Table 4).
In both Study 3 and Study 1, examination of demographic subgroups by sex did not suggest differences in response.
Table 4: Efficacy Results for Cataplexy in Adult Patients with Narcolepsy (Study 3 and Study 1)
| Study |
Endpoint |
Treatment Group (N) |
Baseline Rate Meana (SD) [95% CI] |
Final Rate Meana (SD) [95% CI] |
Rate Ratiob (WAKIX to placebo) [95% CI] |
| Study 3 |
Final Mean Weekly Rate of Cataplexy Over 4-WeekStable Dosing Period
(primary endpoint) |
WAKIX (n=54) |
9.1 (2.0)
[7.6, 11.0] |
2.3 (4.4)
[1.5, 3.4] |
0.51 [0.44, 0.60] |
| Placebo (n=51) |
7.3 (2.0)
[6.0, 8.9] |
4.5 (4.8)
[2.9, 7.0] |
| Study 1 |
Final Mean Daily Rate ofCataplexy at Week 8
(secondary endpoint) |
WAKIX (n=25)c |
0.4 (4.0)
[0.2, 0.7] |
0.1 (2.8)
[0.1, 0.2] |
0.07 [0.01, 0.36] |
| Placebo (n=24) c |
0.3 (3.6)
[0.1, 0.4] |
0.2 (4.3)
[0.1, 0.5] |
CI = confidence interval; SD = standard deviation
aThe mean refers to geometric mean, which was used because values for weekly rate of cataplexy were not normally distributed; the geometric mean takes the average of the logs of the individual values and exponentiates that average back to an arithmetic scale.
b The rate ratio is derived from a Poisson regression model.
c Patients with a history of cataplexy. |
Pediatric Patients (6 years of age and older) with Narcolepsy
The efficacy of WAKIX for the treatment of cataplexy in pediatric patients 6 years of age and older with narcolepsy was evaluated in one multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (Study 4; NCT02611687).
In the subset of patients with a history of cataplexy (n=95), WAKIX demonstrated statistically significantly greater improvement on the least squares mean from baseline to the end of treatment for the average number of cataplexy attacks per week (weekly rate of cataplexy [WRC]) compared with placebo (2.2 in the WAKIX group and 5.6 in the placebo group). The rate ratio, defined as the WRC ratio of the WAKIX group to the placebo group adjusted for baseline value, was 0.39 (95% CI: 0.17; 0.90).