Clinical Pharmacology for Talzenna
Mechanism Of Action
Talazoparib is an inhibitor of PARP enzymes, including PARP1 and PARP2, which play a role in DNA repair. In vitro studies with cancer cell lines that harbored defects in DNA repair genes, including BRCA1 and BRCA2, have shown that talazoparib-induced cytotoxicity may involve inhibition of PARP enzymatic activity and increased formation of PARP-DNA complexes resulting in DNA damage, decreased cell proliferation, and apoptosis. Talazoparib anti-tumor activity was observed in patient-derived xenograft breast cancer models bearing mutated BRCA1 or mutated BRCA2 or wild type BRCA1 and BRCA2.
Pharmacodynamics
The exposure-response relationship and time course of pharmacodynamic response for the safety and effectiveness of TALZENNA have not been fully characterized.
Cardiac Electrophysiology
At a dose of 1 mg (the recommended dosage for treatment of breast cancer), TALZENNA had no large QTc prolongation (i.e., >20 ms).
Pharmacokinetics
After administration of TALZENNA 1 mg orally once daily as a single agent (the recommended dosage for breast cancer), the mean [% coefficient of variation (CV%)] AUC and maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) of talazoparib at steady-state was 173 (32%) ng.hr/mL and 19 (32%) ng/mL, respectively. The mean (CV%) steady-state Ctrough was 3.5 (61%) ng/mL.
After administration of TALZENNA 0.5 mg orally once daily (the recommended dosage for prostate cancer) in combination with enzalutamide, the mean (CV%) steady-state Ctrough ranged from 3.3 to 3.7 ng/mL (45% to 48%).
The pharmacokinetics (PK) of talazoparib is linear from 0.025 mg to 2 mg (2 times the recommended dose for breast cancer). The median accumulation ratio of talazoparib following 1 mg orally once daily is 2.3 to 5.2. Talazoparib plasma concentrations reached steady-state within 2 to 3 weeks when administered as a single agent and within 9 weeks when coadministered with enzalutamide.
Absorption
The median time to Cmax (Tmax) was approximately 1 hour (range: 0.4 to 4 hours) after dosing.
Food Effect
Following administration of a TALZENNA 1 mg dose soft gelatin capsule with high-fat, high-calorie food (approximately 800 to 1,000 calories with 150, 250, and 500 to 600 calories from protein, carbohydrate, and fat, respectively), the mean steady-state Cmax was decreased by 42%, the median Tmax was delayed from 1 to 4 hours, and AUC was not affected as compared to those under fasted conditions.
Distribution
The mean apparent volume of distribution of talazoparib is 420 L. In vitro, protein binding of talazoparib is 74% and is independent of talazoparib concentration.
Elimination
The mean terminal plasma half-life (±standard deviation) is 90 (±58) hours and the mean apparent oral clearance (inter-subject variability) is 6.5 L/h (31%).
Metabolism
Talazoparib undergoes minimal hepatic metabolism. The identified metabolic pathways include mono-oxidation, dehydrogenation, cysteine conjugation of mono-desfluoro-talazoparib, and glucuronide conjugation.
Excretion
Excretion of talazoparib in urine was the major route of elimination. Approximately 69% (55% unchanged) of the total administered radiolabeled dose of talazoparib was recovered in urine, and 20% (14% unchanged) was recovered in feces.
Specific Populations
Age (18 to 88 years), sex, race (361 White, 41 Asian, 16 Black, 9 Others, and 63 Not Reported), body weight (36 to 162 kg), and mild to severe hepatic impairment had no clinically significant effect on the PK of talazoparib.
Patients With Renal Impairment
Mild (eGFR 60 – 89 mL/min/1.73 m²) renal impairment had no clinically significant effect on talazoparib pharmacokinetics. Talazoparib steady-state total exposure (AUC) increased by 43% in subjects with moderate (eGFR 30 – 59 mL/min/1.73 m²) renal impairment and 163% in patients with severe (eGFR 15 – 29 mL/min/1.73 m²) renal impairment relative to subjects with normal renal function (eGFR ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m²). Talazoparib steady-state peak concentration (Cmax) increased by 32% in subjects with moderate renal impairment and 89% in subjects with severe renal impairment, relative to subjects with normal renal function. Similar increases in AUC were observed with talazoparib when given in combination with enzalutamide for patients with moderate and severe renal impairment. The PK of talazoparib has not been studied in patients requiring hemodialysis. There was no evidence of a relationship between the protein binding of talazoparib and renal function.
Drug Interaction Studies
Clinical Studies
Effect of P-gp Inhibitors: Coadministration of a P-gp inhibitor (itraconazole) with a single 0.5 mg dose of TALZENNA increased talazoparib AUC and Cmax by approximately 56% and 40%, respectively. Coadministration with the following other P-gp inhibitors: amiodarone, carvedilol, clarithromycin, itraconazole, and verapamil increased talazoparib exposure by 45%.
Coadministration with other P-gp inhibitors (including azithromycin, atorvastatin, diltiazem, felodipine, fluvoxamine, and quercetin) had no clinically significant effect on talazoparib pharmacokinetics.
Effect of P-gp Inducers: Coadministration of a P-gp inducer (rifampin) with a single 1 mg dose of TALZENNA increased talazoparib Cmax by 37% with no effect on talazoparib AUC.
Effect of Acid-Reducing Agents: Coadministration of acid-reducing agents including proton pump inhibitors (PPI), histamine receptor 2 antagonists (H2RA), or other acid reducing agents has no effect on the absorption of talazoparib.
Enzalutamide: Coadministration of enzalutamide with TALZENNA increased talazoparib exposure approximately 2-fold.
In Vitro Studies
Transporters: Talazoparib is a substrate of P-gp and BCRP transporters, but not a substrate of OATP1B1, OATP1B3, OCT1, OCT2, OAT1, OAT3, BSEP, MATE1, or MATE2-K.
Talazoparib is not an inhibitor of P-gp, BCRP, OATP1B1, OATP1B3, OCT1, OCT2, OAT1, OAT3, BSEP, MATE1, or MATE2-K.
CYP Enzymes: Talazoparib is not an inhibitor of CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, or CYP3A4/5.
Talazoparib is not an inducer of CYP1A2, CYP2B6, or CYP3A4.
UGT: Talazoparib is not an inhibitor of UGT isoforms (1A1, 1A4, 1A6, 1A9, 2B7, and 2B15).
Clinical Studies
Deleterious Or Suspected Deleterious Germline BRCA-mutated HER2-negative Locally Advanced Or Metastatic Breast Cancer
EMBRACA (NCT01945775) was an open-label study in which patients (N=431) with gBRCAm HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer were randomized 2:1 to receive TALZENNA 1 mg or healthcare provider’s choice of chemotherapy (capecitabine, eribulin, gemcitabine, or vinorelbine) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Randomization was stratified by prior lines of chemotherapy for metastatic disease (0 versus 1, 2, or 3), by triple-negative disease status [triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) versus non-TNBC], and history of central nervous system (CNS) metastasis (yes versus no).
Patients received no more than 3 prior cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens for their metastatic or locally advanced disease. Patients were required to have received treatment with an anthracycline and/or a taxane (unless contraindicated) in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and/or metastatic treatment setting. First-line treatment for advanced or metastatic disease with no prior adjuvant chemotherapy was allowed if the investigator determined that 1 of the 4 chemotherapy choices in the control arm would be an appropriate treatment option for the patient.
Patients with prior platinum therapy for advanced disease were required to have no evidence of disease progression during platinum therapy. No prior treatment with a PARP inhibitor was permitted. Of the 431 patients randomized in the EMBRACA study, 408 (95%) were centrally confirmed to have a deleterious or suspected deleterious gBRCAm using a clinical trial assay; out of which 354 (82%) were confirmed using the BRACAnalysis CDx®. BRCA mutation status [breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1)-positive or breast cancer susceptibility gene 2 (BRCA2)-positive] was similar across both treatment arms.
The median age of patients treated with TALZENNA was 46 years (range 28 to 84) and 51 years (range 24 to 89) among patients treated with chemotherapy. Among all randomized patients, 1% versus 2% were males, 67% versus 75% were White; 11% versus 11% were Asian, and 4% versus 1% were Black or African American in the TALZENNA and chemotherapy arms, respectively. Almost all patients (98%) in both arms had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. Approximately 56% of patients had estrogen receptor-positive and/or progesterone receptor-positive disease; 44% of patients had triple-negative disease, and the proportions were balanced across both treatment arms. Fifteen percent (15%) of patients in the TALZENNA arm and 14% of patients in the chemotherapy arm had a history of CNS metastases. Ninety-one percent (91%) of patients in the TALZENNA arm had received prior taxane therapy, and 85% had received prior anthracycline therapy in any setting. Sixteen percent (16%) of patients in the TALZENNA arm and 21% of patients in the chemotherapy arm had received prior platinum treatment in any setting. The median number of prior cytotoxic regimens for patients with advanced breast cancer was one; 38% received no prior cytotoxic regimens for advanced or metastatic disease, 37% received one, 20% received two, and 5% received three or more prior cytotoxic regimens.
The major efficacy outcome measure was progression-free survival (PFS) evaluated according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR). A statistically significant improvement in PFS was demonstrated for TALZENNA compared with chemotherapy. A sensitivity analysis of investigator-assessed PFS was consistent with the BICR-assessed PFS results. Consistent PFS results were observed across patient subgroups defined by study stratification factors (prior lines of chemotherapy, TNBC status, and history of CNS metastases). Efficacy data from the EMBRACA study are summarized in Table 9, and the Kaplan-Meier curves for PFS are shown in Figure 1 and final overall survival (OS) in Figure 2.
Table 9: Summary of Efficacy Results-EMBRACA Study
|
TALZENNA |
Chemotherapy |
| PFS by BICR |
N=287 |
N=144 |
| Disease progression or deaths, n (%) |
186 (65) |
83 (58) |
| Median months (95% CI) |
8.6 (7.2, 9.3) |
5.6 (4.2, 6.7) |
| Hazard ratio (95% CI)a |
0.54 (0.41, 0.71) |
| p-valueb |
p<0.0001 |
| Patients with measurable disease by investigatorc |
N=219 |
N=114 |
| ORR, % (95% CI)d |
50.2 (43.4, 57.0) |
18.4 (11.8, 26.8) |
| Mediane DOR months (95% CI) |
6.4 (5.4, 9.5) |
3.9 (3.0, 7.6) |
| OS |
N=287 |
N=144 |
| Deaths, n (%) |
216 (75) |
108 (75) |
| Median months (95% CI) |
19.3 (16.6, 22.5) |
19.5 (17.4, 22.4) |
| Hazard ratio (95% CI)a |
0.85 (0.67, 1.07) |
| p-valueb |
p=0.1693 |
Abbreviations: BICR=blinded independent central review; CI=confidence interval; DOR=duration of response; ITT=intent-toÂtreat; N=number of patients; ORR=objective response rate; OS=overall survival; PFS=progression-free survival.
a Hazard ratio is estimated from a Cox proportional hazards model stratified by prior use of chemotherapy for metastatic disease (0 versus 1, 2, or 3), by triple-negative disease status (triple-negative breast cancer [TNBC] versus non TNBC), and by history of central nervous system metastasis (yes versus no) and was relative to overall chemotherapy with <1 favoring talazoparib.
b P-values (2-sided) from the log-rank test stratified by number of prior cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens, triple negative status and history of central nervous system metastasis.
c Conducted in ITT population with measurable disease at baseline.
d Response rate based on confirmed responses.
e Median estimated from Kaplan-Meier probabilities. |
Figure 1: Kaplan-Meier Curves of PFS – EMBRACA Study
Figure 2: Kaplan-Meier Curves of OS – EMBRACA Study (ITT Population)
HRR Gene-mutated mCRPC
The efficacy of TALZENNA in combination with enzalutamide was evaluated in TALAPRO-2 (NCT03395197), a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-cohort trial in which 399 patients with HRR gene-mutated (HRRm) mCRPC were randomized 1:1 to receive enzalutamide 160 mg daily plus either TALZENNA 0.5 mg or placebo daily until unacceptable toxicity or progression. All patients received a GnRH analog or had prior bilateral orchiectomy and needed to have progressed on prior androgen deprivation therapy. Prior treatment with a CYP17 inhibitor or docetaxel for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) was permitted. Mutation status of HRR genes was determined prospectively using solid tumor tissue or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based next generation sequencing assays. Patients were required to have a mutation in at least one of 12 genes involved directly or indirectly in the HRR pathway (ATM, ATR, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDK12, CHEK2, FANCA, MLH1, MRE11A, NBN, PALB2, or RAD51C).
Randomization was stratified by previous treatment with a CYP17 inhibitor or docetaxel (yes/no).
The median age was 70 years (range: 41 to 90); 100% were male; 68% were White, 21% Asian, 2.8% Black, 0.8% Other, 7% unknown/not reported; 12% were Hispanic/Latino; and baseline ECOG performance status was 0 (62%) or 1 (38%). Thirty-nine percent of patients had bone-only disease; 15% had visceral disease. In the mCSPC setting, 29% percent of patients had received docetaxel and 9% had received a prior CYP17 inhibitor. The most commonly mutated HRR genes (>5%), including co-occurring mutations, were: BRCA2 (34%), ATM (22%), CDK12 (19%), CHEK2 (18%), and BRCA1 (6%).
The major efficacy outcome measure was radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) evaluated according to RECIST, version 1.1 and Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG3) (bone) criteria, assessed by BICR. An additional efficacy outcome measure was OS.
A statistically significant improvement in rPFS was demonstrated at the pre-specified interim analysis in patients randomized to TALZENNA in combination with enzalutamide compared with placebo in combination with enzalutamide. Consistent rPFS results were observed in patients who received or did not receive a prior CYP17 inhibitor or docetaxel. The OS data were not mature at the time of the rPFS analysis (24% of patients had died). Efficacy results are presented in Table 10 and Figure 3.
Table 10: Efficacy Results for TALAPRO-2 (HRR Gene-mutated mCRPC)
|
TALZENNA with Enzalutamide
(N=200) |
Placebo with Enzalutamide
(N=199) |
| Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS) by BICR |
| Number of rPFS events, n (%) |
66 (33) |
104 (52) |
| Median months (95% CI) |
NE (21.9, NE) |
13.8 (11.0, 16.7) |
| Hazard ratio (95% CI)* |
0.45 (0.33, 0.61) |
| p-value† |
<0.0001 |
Abbreviations: BICR=blinded independent central review; CI=confidence interval; CSPC=castration-sensitive prostate cancer; HRRm=homologous recombination repair gene-mutated; mCRPC=metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; N=number of patients; NE=not evaluable.
* Hazard ratio and CI were based on Cox PH model stratified by previous treatment for CSPC.
† p-value was based on log-rank test stratified by previous treatment for CSPC and compared with the boundary 0.0076. |
Figure 3: Kaplan-Meier Curve for rPFS in TALAPRO-2 (HRR Gene-mutated mCRPC)
Abbreviations: HRRm=homologous recombination repair gene-mutated; mCRPC=metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; rPFS=radiographic progression-free survival.
Exploratory subgroup analyses of rPFS for patients with BRCA-mutated (BRCAm) and non-BRCAm HRRm are presented in Table 11.
Table 11: Exploratory rPFS Subgroup Analyses by BRCAm Status for TALAPRO-2 (HRR Gene-mutated mCRPC)
|
BRCAm |
Non-BRCAm HRRm* |
TALZENNA with Enzalutamide
N=71 |
Placebo with Enzalutamide
N=84 |
TALZENNA with Enzalutamide
N=129 |
Placebo with Enzalutamide
N=115 |
| rPFS |
| Number of events, n (%) |
15 (21) |
54 (64) |
51 (40) |
50(43) |
| Median months (95% CI) |
NE
(NE, NE) |
11.0
(8.3, 11.1) |
24.7
(16.4, NE) |
16.7
(13.8, 27.7) |
| Hazard ratio (95% CI) |
0.20 (0.11, 0.36) |
0.72 (0.49, 1.07) |
Abbreviations: BRCAm=breast cancer susceptibility gene-mutated; CI=confidence interval; HRRm=homologous recombination repair gene-mutated; NE=not evaluable; rPFS=radiographic progression-free survival.
* Includes 4 patients who were incorrectly randomized in the HRRm stratum who did not have HRR gene mutations. |