Clinical Pharmacology for Sunlenca
Mechanism Of Action
SUNLENCA is an HIV-1 antiretroviral agent [see Microbiology].
Pharmacodynamics
Exposure-Response
In CAPELLA, oral loading doses (600 mg on Day 1 and Day 2, 300 mg on Day 8) followed by subcutaneous doses (927 mg every 6 months starting on Day 15) of SUNLENCA in heavily treatment-experienced subjects with multiclass resistant HIV-1, efficacy outcomes (change in plasma HIV-1 RNA from Day 1 to Day 14, and percentage of subjects with HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/mL at Week 26) were similar across the range of observed lenacapavir exposures.
Cardiac Electrophysiology
At supratherapeutic exposures of lenacapavir (9-fold higher than the therapeutic exposures of SUNLENCA), SUNLENCA does not prolong the QTcF interval to any clinically relevant extent.
Pharmacokinetics
The pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of lenacapavir are provided in Table 6 and Table 7. The estimated lenacapavir exposures are comparable between the two recommended dosing regimens.
Table 6 : Pharmacokinetic Properties of Lenacapavir
|
Oral |
Subcutaneous |
| Absorption |
| % Absolute bioavailability |
6 to 10 |
100 a |
| T maxb |
4 hours |
77 to 84 days c |
| Effect of Food |
| Effect of low-fat meal (relative to fasting) d |
AUCinf ratio |
98.6
(58.2,167.2) |
- |
| Cmax ratio |
115.8
(55.4, 242.1) |
- |
| Effect of high-fat meal (relative to fasting) e |
AUCinf ratio |
115.2
(72.0, 184.5) |
- |
| Cmax ratio |
145.2
(77.9, 270.5) |
- |
| Distribution |
| Apparent volume of distribution (Vd/F, L) |
19240 |
9500 to 11700 |
| % bound to human plasma proteins |
>98.5 |
| Blood-to-plasma ratio |
0.5 to 0.7 f |
| Elimination |
| t½ |
10 to 12 days |
8 to 12 weeks |
| Clearance (mean apparent clearance, L/h) |
55 |
4.2 |
| % of dose of unchanged drug in plasma g |
69 |
| Metabolism |
| Metabolic pathway(s) |
CYP3A (minor) UGT1A1 (minor) |
| Excretion |
| Major routes of elimination |
Excretion of unchanged drug into feces h |
| % of dose excreted in urine g |
<1 |
| % of dose excreted in feces (% unchanged)h |
76 (33) |
aValues reflect absolute bioavailability following subcutaneous administration of the 927 mg dose.
bValues reflect administration of lenacapavir with or without food.
cDue to slow release from the site of subcutaneous administration, the absorption profile of subcutaneously administered lenacapavir is complex.
dValues refer to geometric mean ratio [low-fat meal/fasting] in PK parameters and (90% confidence interval). Low fat meal is approximately 400 kcal, 25% fat.
eValues refer to geometric mean ratio [high-fat meal/fasting] in PK parameters and (90% confidence interval). High fat meal is approximately 1000 kcal, 50% fat.
fValues reflect the blood-to-plasma ratio of lenacapavir following a single dose intravenous administration of [14C] lenacapavir through 336 hours postdose.
gDosing in mass balance studies: single dose intravenous administration of [14C] lenacapair to subjects without HIV-1 infection.
hMetabolized via oxidation, N-dealkylation, hydrogenation, amide hydrolysis, glucuronidation, hexose conjugation, pentose conjugation, and glutathione conjugation; primarily via CYP3A and UGT1A1 and no single circulating metabolite accounted for >10% of plasma drug-related exposure. |
Table 7 : Lenacapavir Exposures Following Oral and Subcutaneous Administration of SUNLENCA in Heavily Treatment Experienced Subjects with HIV
| Parameter Mean (%CV) |
Recommended Dosing Regimen, Option 1 a |
Recommended Dosing Regimen, Option 2 b |
| Day 1: 600 mg (oral) + 927 mg (SC) Day 2: 600 mg (oral) |
Days 1 and 2: 600 mg (oral), Day 8: 300 mg (oral), Day 15: 927 mg (SC) |
| Day 1 to end of Month 6 |
Days 1 to 15 |
Day 15 to end of Month 6 |
| Cmax (ng/mL) |
97.1 (61.6) |
124.4 (85.1) |
87.3 (49.4) |
| AUCtau (h•ng/mL) |
234294.8 (65.1) |
25962.9 (67.8) |
251907.2 (48.2) |
| Ctrough (ng/mL) |
29.2 (90.8) |
48.6 (52.1) |
35.1 (59.2) |
CV = coefficient of variation; NA = not applicable; SC = subcutaneous
aPredicted exposures.
bPost hoc exposures from CAPELLA (N=62). |
The estimated exposures of lenacapavir were 43% to 100% higher in subjects with HIV-1 infection compared to subjects without HIV-1 infection.
Specific Populations
There were no clinically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of lenacapavir based on age (18 to 78 years), sex, ethnicity (hispanic or non-hispanic), race (white, black, asian or other), body weight (41.4 to 164 kg), severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance of 15 to less than 30 mL per minute, estimated by Cockroft-Gault method), or moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class B). The effect of end-stage renal disease (including dialysis), or severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class C), on the pharmacokinetics of lenacapavir is unknown. As lenacapavir is greater than 98.5% protein bound, dialysis is not expected to alter exposures of lenacapavir [see Use In Specific Populations].
Drug Interaction Studies
Clinical Studies
Clinical drug-drug interaction study indicated that lenacapavir is a substrate of CYP3A, P-gp, and UGT1A1. Table 8 summarizes the pharmacokinetic effects of other drugs on lenacapavir.
Lenacapavir is a moderate inhibitor of CYP3A. Lenacapavir is an inhibitor of P-gp and BCRP but does not inhibit OATP. Table 9 summarizes the pharmacokinetic effects of lenacapavir on other drugs.
Table 8 : Effect of Other Drugs on Lenacapavira,b
| Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug (mg) |
Mean Ratio of Lenacapavir Pharmacokinetic Parameters (90% CI); No effect = 1.00 |
| Cmax |
AUC |
| Cobicistat (fed) (Inhibitor of CYP3A [strong] and P-gp) |
150 once daily |
2.10
(1.62, 2.72) |
2.28
(1.75, 2.96) |
| Darunavir / cobicistat (fed) (Inhibitor of CYP3A [strong] and inhibitor and inducer of P-gp) |
800/150 once daily |
2.30
(1.79, 2.95) |
1.94
(1.50, 2.52) |
| Voriconazole (fasted) (Inhibitor of CYP3A [strong]) |
400 twice daily, 200 twice daily c |
1.09
(0.81, 1.47) |
1.41
(1.10, 1.81) |
| Atazanavir / cobicistat (fed) (Inhibitor of CYP3A [strong] and UGT1A1 and P-gp) |
300/150 once daily |
6.60
(4.99, 8.73) |
4.21
(3.19, 5.57) |
| Rifampin (fasted) (Inducer of CYP3A [strong] and P-gp and UGT) |
600 once daily |
0.45
(0.34, 0.60) |
0.16
(0.12, 0.20) |
| Efavirenz (fasted) (Inducer of CYP3A [moderate] and P-gp) |
600 once daily |
0.64
(0.45, 0.92) |
0.44
(0.32, 0.59) |
| Famotidine (2 hours before, fasted) |
40 once daily |
1.01
(0.75, 1.34) |
1.28
(1.00, 1.63) |
aSingle dose of lenacapavir 300 mg administered orally.
bAll interaction studies conducted in subjects without HIV-1.
c400 mg loading dose twice daily for a day, followed by 200 mg maintenance dose twice daily. |
Table 9 : Effect of Lenacapavir on Other Drugsa,b
| Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug
(mg) |
Mean Ratio of Coadministered Drug Pharmacokinetic Parameters
(90% CI) c; No effect = 1.00 |
| Cmax |
AUC |
| Tenofovir alafenamide (fed) (substrate of P-gp) |
25 single dose |
1.24
(0.98, 1.58) |
1.32
(1.09, 1.59) |
| Tenofovir d (substrate of P-gp) |
1.23
(1.05, 1.44) |
1.47
(1.27, 1.71) |
Pitavastatin (simultaneous administration, fed)
(substrate of OATP) |
2 single dose |
1.00
(0.84, 1.19) |
1.11
(1.00, 1.25) |
| Pitavastatin (3 days after lenacapavir, fed) (substrate of OATP) |
2 single dose |
0.85
(0.69, 1.05) |
0.96
(0.87, 1.07) |
Rosuvastatin (fed)
(substrate of BCRP and OATP) |
5 single dose |
1.57
(1.38, 1.80) |
1.31
(1.19, 1.43) |
Midazolam (simultaneous administration, fed)
(substrate of CYP3A) |
2.5 single dose |
1.94
(1.81, 2.08) |
3.59
(3.30, 3.91) |
| 1-hydroxymidazolam e (substrate of CYP3A) |
0.54
(0.50, 0.59) |
0.76
(0.72, 0.80) |
Midazolam (1 day after lenacapavir, fed)
(substrate of CYP3A) |
2.5 single dose |
2.16
(2.02, 2.30) |
4.08
(3.77, 4.41) |
| 1-hydroxymidazolam e (substrate of CYP3A) |
0.52
(0.48, 0.57) |
0.84
(0.80, 0.88) |
aAll interaction studies conducted in subjects without HIV-1.
bFollowing 600 mg twice daily for 2 days, single 600 mg doses of lenacapavir were administered with each coadministered drug, resulting in lenacapavir exposures similar to or higher than those at the recommended dosage regimen.
cAll No Effect Boundaries are 70% to 143%.
dTenofovir alafenamide is converted to tenofovir in vivo.
eMajor active metabolite of midazolam. |
In Vitro Studies
Cytochrome P450 (CYP) Enzymes
Lenacapavir is not a substrate, inducer, or inhibitor of CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6. Lenacapavir is not an inducer of CYP3A4.
Uridine Diphosphate (UDP)-Glucuronosyl Transferase (UGT) Enzymes
Lenacapavir is not an inhibitor of UGT1A1.
Transporter Systems
Lenacapavir is not an inhibitor of organic anion transporter 1 (OAT1), OAT3, organic cation transporter (OCT)1, OCT2, multidrug and toxin extrusion transporter (MATE) 1, or MATE 2-K. Lenacapavir is not a substrate of BCRP, OATP1B1, or OATP1B3.
Microbiology
Mechanism Of Action
Lenacapavir is a multistage, selective inhibitor of HIV-1 capsid function that directly binds to the interface between capsid protein (p24) subunits in hexamers. Surface plasmon resonance sensorgrams showed dose-dependent and saturable binding of lenacapavir to cross-linked wild-type capsid hexamer with an equilibrium binding constant (KD) of 1.4 nM. Lenacapavir inhibits HIV-1 replication by interfering with multiple essential steps of the viral lifecycle, including capsid-mediated nuclear uptake of HIV-1 proviral DNA (by blocking nuclear import proteins binding to capsid), virus assembly and release (by interfering with Gag/Gag-Pol functioning, reducing production of capsid protein subunits), and capsid core formation (by disrupting the rate of capsid subunit association, leading to malformed capsids).
Antiviral Activity In Cell Culture
Lenacapavir has antiviral activity that is specific to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1 and HIV-2). The antiviral activity of lenacapavir against laboratory and clinical isolates of HIV-1 was assessed in T-lymphoblastoid cell lines, PBMCs, primary monocyte/macrophage cells, and CD4+ T-lymphocytes with EC50 values ranging from 30 to 190 pM. Lenacapavir displayed antiviral activity in cell culture against all HIV-1 groups (M, N, O), including subtypes A, A1, AE, AG, B, BF, C, D, E, F, G with EC50 values ranging from 20 and 160 pM. The median EC50 value for subtype B isolates (n=8) was 40 pM. Lenacapavir was 15-to 25-fold less active against HIV-2 isolates relative to HIV-1.
In a study of lenacapavir in combination with representatives from the major classes of anti-retroviral agents (INSTIs, NNRTIs, NRTIs, and PIs), no antagonism of antiviral activity was observed.
Resistance
In Cell Culture
HIV-1 variants with reduced susceptibility to lenacapavir have been selected in cell culture. Resistance selections with lenacapavir identified 7 substitutions in capsid: L56I, M66I, Q67H, K70N, N74D/S, and T107N singly or in dual combination that conferred 4Âto >3,226-fold reduced phenotypic susceptibility to lenacapavir relative to wild-type (WT) virus. The M66I substitution alone or in combination conferred >3,226-fold decreased susceptibility to lenacapavir in a single-cycle infectivity assay; substitutions Q67H and T107N, conferred 4-to 6.3-fold decreased susceptibility; K70N, N74D and Q67H/N74S conferred 22-to 32-fold decreased susceptibility; and L56I conferred 239-fold decreased susceptibility.
In Clinical Trials
In CAPELLA, 31% (22/72) of heavily treatment-experienced subjects met the criteria for resistance analyses through Week 52 (HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL at confirmed virologic failure [suboptimal virologic response at Week 4, virologic rebound, or viremia at last visit]) and were analyzed for lenacapavir resistance-associated substitution emergence. Lenacapavir resistance-associated capsid substitutions were found in 41% (n=9) of subjects with confirmed virologic failure who had post-baseline capsid genotypic resistance data (n=22). The M66I CA substitution was observed in 27% (6/22) of subjects, alone or in combination with other lenacapavir resistance-associated capsid substitutions including Q67Q/H, Q67Q/H/K/N, K70K/R, K70N/S, N74D, N74N/H, A105T, and T107A. The other 3 subjects with virologic failure had emergent lenacapavir resistance-associated capsid substitutions Q67K+K70H, Q67H+K70R+T107S, and Q67Q/H.
Phenotypic analyses of the confirmed virologic failure isolates with emergent lenacapavir resistance-associated substitutions showed 6-to >1428-fold decreases in lenacapavir susceptibility when compared to WT.
Among the 9 subjects with virologic failure who developed lenacapavir resistance-associated substitutions in capsid, 4 received SUNLENCA in combination with a background regimen with no fully active antiretrovirals based on the baseline genotypic and/or phenotypic resistance. Therefore, given the risk of developing resistance in situations of functional monotherapy, careful consideration should be given to having active drugs in addition to SUNLENCA in the treatment regimen.
Four subjects with virologic failure had emergent resistance substitutions to components of the optimized background regimen (OBR): emergent NRTI substitution M184I/V and NNRTI substitution K103N/Y with emtricitabine and doravirine plus atazanavir, bictegravir, and tenofovir alafenamide in OBR; emergent NNRTI substitution V106M from a mixture at baseline (in addition to lenacapavir resistance-associated substitutions M66I + T107A) with doravirine plus emtricitabine and ibalizumab in OBR; emergent NRTI substitutions K65R and S68N from mixtures at baseline (in addition to lenacapavir resistance-associated substitution M66I) with tenofovir alafenamide, plus emtricitabine, dolutegravir, darunavir/cobicistat, and rilpivirine in OBR; and emergent NRTI substitution K65K/R with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus darunavir/cobicistat, dolutegravir, and emtricitabine in OBR.
Cross-Resistance
The antiviral activity in cell culture of lenacapavir was determined against a broad spectrum of HIV-1 site-directed mutants and patient-derived HIV-1 isolates with resistance to the four main classes of anti-retroviral agents (INSTI, NNRTI, NRTI, and PI; n=58), as well as to viruses resistant to the gp120-directed attachment inhibitor fostemsavir, the CD4+-directed post-attachment inhibitor ibalizumab, the CCR5 co-receptor antagonist maraviroc, and the gp41 fusion inhibitor enfuvirtide (n=42). These data indicated that lenacapavir remained fully active against all variants tested, thereby demonstrating a non-overlapping resistance profile. In addition, the antiviral activity of lenacapavir in patient isolates was unaffected by the presence of naturally occurring Gag polymorphisms and substitutions at protease cleavage sites.
Clinical Studies
The efficacy and safety of SUNLENCA in HIV-1 infected, heavily treatment-experienced subjects with multidrug resistance is based on 52-week data from CAPELLA, a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter trial (NCT 04150068).
CAPELLA was conducted in 72 heavily treatment-experienced subjects with multiclass resistant HIV-1. Subjects were required to have a viral load ≥ 400 copies/mL, documented resistance to at least two antiretroviral medications from each of at least 3 of the 4 classes of antiretroviral medications (NRTI, NNRTI, PI and INSTI), and ≤ 2 fully active antiretroviral medications from the 4 classes of antiretroviral medications remaining at baseline due to resistance, intolerability, drug access, contraindication, or other safety concerns.
The trial was composed of two cohorts. Subjects were enrolled into the randomized cohort (cohort 1, N=36) if they had a < 0.5 log10 HIV-1 RNA decline compared to the screening visit. Subjects were enrolled into the non-randomized cohort (cohort 2, N=36) if they had a ≥ 0.5 log10 HIV-1 RNA decline compared to the screening visit or after cohort 1 reached its planned sample size.
In the 14-day functional monotherapy period, subjects in cohort 1 were randomized in a 2:1 ratio in a blinded fashion to receive either SUNLENCA or placebo, while continuing their failing regimen. This period was to establish the virologic activity of SUNLENCA. After the functional monotherapy period, subjects who had received SUNLENCA continued on SUNLENCA along with an optimized background regimen (OBR); subjects who had received placebo during this period initiated SUNLENCA along with an OBR.
Subjects in cohort 1 had a mean age of 52 years (range: 24 to 71), 72% were male, 46% were White, 46% were Black, and 9% were Asian. 29% percent of subjects identified as Hispanic/Latino. The mean baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA was 4.3 log10 copies/mL (range: 2.3 to 5.4). 19% of subjects had baseline viral loads greater than 100,000 copies/mL. The mean baseline CD4+ cell count was 161 cells/mm³ (range: 6 to 827). 75% of subjects had CD4+ cell counts below 200 cells/mm³. The mean number of years since subjects first started HIV treatment was 24 years (range: 7 to 33); the mean number of antiretroviral agents in failing regimens at baseline was 4 (range: 1 to 7). The percentage of subjects in the randomized cohort with known resistance to at least 2 agents from the NRTI, NNRTI, PI and INSTI classes was 97%, 94%, 78% and 75%, respectively. In cohort 1, 53% of subjects had no fully active agents, 31% had 1 fully active agent, and 17% had 2 or more fully active agents within their initial failing regimen, including 6% of subjects were who were receiving fostemsavir, which was an investigational agent at the start of the CAPELLA trial.
Subjects in cohort 2 initiated SUNLENCA and an OBR on Day 1.
Subjects in cohort 2 had a mean age of 48 years (range: 23 to 78), 78% were male, 36% were White, 31% were Black, 33% were Asian, and 14% of subjects identified as Hispanic/Latino. The mean baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA was 4.1 log10 copies/mL (range: 1.3 to 5.7). 19% of subjects had baseline viral loads greater than 100,000 copies/mL. The mean baseline CD4+ cell count was 258 cells/mm³ (range: 3 to 1296). 53% of subjects had CD4+ cell counts below 200 cells/mm³. The mean number of years since subjects first started HIV treatment was 19 years (range: 3 to 35); the mean number of antiretroviral agents in failing regimens at baseline was 4 (range: 2 to 7). The percentage of subjects in the non-randomized cohort with known resistance to at least 2 agents from the NRTI, NNRTI, PI and INSTI classes was 100%, 100%, 83% and 64%, respectively. In cohort 2, 31% of subjects had no fully active agents, 42% had 1 fully active agent, and 28% had 2 or more fully active agents within their initial failing regimen, including 6% of subjects who were receiving fostemsavir, which was an investigational agent at the start of the CAPELLA trial.
The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of subjects in cohort 1 achieving ≥ 0.5 log10 copies/mL reduction from baseline in HIV-1 RNA at the end of the functional monotherapy period. The results of the primary endpoint analysis are shown in Table 10.
Table 10 : Proportion of Subjects Achieving a ≥ 0.5 log10 Decrease in Viral Load at the End of the Functional Monotherapy Period in the CAPELLA Trial(Cohort 1)
|
SUNLENCA
(N=24) |
Placebo
(N=12) |
| Proportion of Subjects Achieving a ≥ 0.5 log10 Decrease in Viral Load |
87.5% |
16.7% |
| Treatment Difference (95% CI) |
70.8% (34.9% to 90.0%) a |
| a p < 0.0001 The results at Weeks 26 and 52 are provided in Table 11 and Table 12. |
Table 11 : Virologic Outcomes (HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL) at Weeks 26a and 52b with SUNLENCA plus OBR in the CAPELLA Trial (Cohort 1)
|
SUNLENCA plus OBR
(N=36) |
| Week 26 |
Week 52 |
| HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL |
81% |
83% |
| HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mLc |
19% |
14% |
| No virologic data in Week 26 or 52 Window |
0 |
3% |
| Discontinued Study Drug Due to AE or Death d |
0 |
0 |
| Discontinued Study Drug Due to Other Reasons e and Last Available HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL |
0 |
3% |
| Missing Data During Window but on Study Drug |
0 |
0 |
OBR = optimized background regimen
aWeek 26 window was between Days 184 and 232 (inclusive).
bWeek 52 window was between Days 324 and 414 (inclusive).
cIncludes subjects who had ≥ 50 copies/mL in the Week 26 or 52 window; subjects who discontinued early due to lack or loss of efficacy; subjects who discontinued for reasons other than an adverse event (AE), death or lack or loss of efficacy and at the time of discontinuation had a viral value of ≥ 50 copies/mL.
dIncludes subjects who discontinued due to AE or death at any time point from Day 1 through the time window if this resulted in no virologic data on treatment during the specified window.
eIncludes subjects who discontinued for reasons other than an AE, death or lack or loss of efficacy, e.g., withdrew consent, loss to follow-up, etc. |
Table 12 : Virologic Outcomes (HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL) by Baseline Covariates at Weeks 26a and 52b with SUNLENCA plus OBR in the CAPELLA trial (Cohort 1)
|
SUNLENCA plus OBR
(N=36) |
| Week 26 |
Week 52 |
| Age (Years) |
| < 50 |
100% (9/9) |
89% (8/9) |
| ≥ 50 |
74% (20/27) |
81% (22/27) |
| Gender |
| Male |
77% (20/26) |
77% (20/26) |
| Female |
90% (9/10) |
100% (10/10) |
| Race |
| Black |
81% (13/16) |
75% (12/16) |
| Non-Black |
84% (16/19) |
89% (17/19) |
| Baseline plasma viral load (copies/mL) |
| ≤ 100,000 |
86% (25/29) |
86% (25/29) |
| > 100,000 |
57% (4/7) |
71% (5/7) |
| Baseline CD4+ (cells/mm³) |
| < 200 |
78% (21/27) |
78% (21/27) |
| ≥ 200 |
89% (8/9) |
100% (9/9) |
| Baseline INSTI resistance profile |
| With INSTI resistance |
85% (23/27) |
81% (22/27) |
| Without INSTI resistance |
63% (5/8) |
88% (7/8) |
| Number of fully active ARV agents in the OBR |
| 0 |
67% (4/6) |
67% (4/6) |
| 1 |
86% (12/14) |
79% (11/14) |
| ≥ 2 |
81% (13/16) |
94% (15/16) |
| Use of DTG and/or DRV in the OBR |
| With DTG and DRV |
83% (10/12) |
83% (10/12) |
| With DTG, without DRV |
83% (5/6) |
83% (5/6) |
| Without DTG, with DRV |
78% (7/9) |
89% (8/9) |
| Without DTG or DRV |
78% (7/9) |
78% (7/9) |
ARV = antiretroviral; DRV=darunavir; DTG=dolutegravir; INSTI = integrase strand-transfer inhibitor; OBR = optimized background regimen;
aWeek 26 window was between Days 184 and 232 (inclusive).
bWeek 52 window was between Days 324 and 414 (inclusive). |
In cohort 1, at Weeks 26 and 52, the mean change from baseline in CD4+ cell count was 81 cells/mm³ (range: -101 to 522) and 82 cells/mm³ (range: -194 to 467), respectively.
In cohort 2, at Week 26 and 52, 81% (29/36) and 72% (26/36) of patients achieved HIVÂ1 RNA < 50 copies/mL, respectively, and the mean change from baseline in CD4+ cell count was 97 cells/mm³ (range: -103 to 459) and 113 cells/mm³ (range: -124 to 405), respectively.