Clinical Pharmacology for Steglujan
Mechanism Of Action
STEGLUJAN
STEGLUJAN combines two antihyperglycemic agents with complementary mechanisms of action to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: ertugliflozin, a SGLT2 inhibitor, and sitagliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor.
Ertugliflozin
SGLT2 is the predominant transporter responsible for reabsorption of glucose from the glomerular filtrate back into the circulation. Ertugliflozin is an inhibitor of SGLT2. By inhibiting SGLT2, ertugliflozin reduces renal reabsorption of filtered glucose and lowers the renal threshold for glucose, and thereby increases urinary glucose excretion.
Sitagliptin
Sitagliptin is a DPP-4 inhibitor, which is believed to exert its actions in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus by slowing the inactivation of incretin hormones. Concentrations of the active intact hormones are increased by sitagliptin, thereby increasing and prolonging the action of these hormones. Incretin hormones, including glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), are released by the intestine throughout the day, and levels are increased in response to a meal.
These hormones are rapidly inactivated by the enzyme, DPP-4. The incretins are part of an endogenous system involved in the physiologic regulation of glucose homeostasis. When blood glucose concentrations are normal or elevated, GLP-1 and GIP increase insulin synthesis and release from pancreatic beta cells by intracellular signaling pathways involving cyclic AMP. GLP-1 also lowers glucagon secretion from pancreatic alpha cells, leading to reduced hepatic glucose production. By increasing and prolonging active incretin levels, sitagliptin increases insulin release and decreases glucagon levels in the circulation in a glucose-dependent manner. Sitagliptin demonstrates selectivity for DPP-4 and does not inhibit DPP-8 or DPP-9 activity in vitro at concentrations approximating those from therapeutic doses.
Pharmacodynamics
Ertugliflozin
Urinary Glucose Excretion and Urinary Volume
Dose-dependent increases in the amount of glucose excreted in urine were observed in healthy subjects and in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus following single- and multiple-dose administration of ertugliflozin. Dose-response modeling indicates that ertugliflozin 5 mg and 15 mg result in near maximal urinary glucose excretion (UGE). Enhanced UGE is maintained after multiple-dose administration. UGE with ertugliflozin also results in increases in urinary volume.
Cardiac Electrophysiology
The effect of ertugliflozin on QTc interval was evaluated in a Phase 1 randomized, placebo- and positive-controlled 3-period crossover study in 42 healthy subjects. At 6.7 times the therapeutic exposures with maximum recommended dose, ertugliflozin does not prolong QTc to any clinically relevant extent.
Sitagliptin
General
In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, administration of sitagliptin led to inhibition of DPP-4 enzyme activity for a 24-hour period. After an oral glucose load or a meal, this DPP-4 inhibition resulted in a 2- to 3- fold increase in circulating levels of active GLP-1 and GIP, decreased glucagon concentrations, and increased responsiveness of insulin release to glucose, resulting in higher C-peptide and insulin concentrations. The rise in insulin with the decrease in glucagon was associated with lower fasting glucose concentrations and reduced glucose excursion following an oral glucose load or a meal.
In a two-day study in healthy subjects, sitagliptin alone increased active GLP-1 concentrations, whereas metformin alone increased active and total GLP-1 concentrations to similar extents. Coadministration of sitagliptin and metformin had an additive effect on active GLP-1 concentrations. Sitagliptin, but not metformin, increased active GIP concentrations. It is unclear how these findings relate to changes in glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
In studies with healthy subjects, sitagliptin did not lower blood glucose or cause hypoglycemia.
Cardiac Electrophysiology
In a randomized, placebo controlled crossover study, 79 healthy subjects were administered a single oral dose of sitagliptin 100 mg, sitagliptin 800 mg (8 times the recommended dose), and placebo. At the recommended dose of 100 mg, there was no effect on the QTc interval obtained at the peak plasma concentration, or at any other time during the study. Following the 800 mg dose, the maximum increase in the placebo corrected mean change in QTc from baseline was observed at 3 hours postdose and was 8.0 msec. This increase is not considered to be clinically significant. At the 800 mg dose, peak sitagliptin plasma concentrations were approximately 11 times higher than the peak concentrations following a 100-mg dose.
In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus administered sitagliptin 100 mg (N=81) or sitagliptin 200 mg (N=63) daily, there were no meaningful changes in QTc interval based on ECG data obtained at the time of expected peak plasma concentration.
Pharmacokinetics
General Introduction
Ertugliflozin
The pharmacokinetics of ertugliflozin are similar in healthy subjects and patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The steady state mean plasma AUC and Cmax were 398 ng·hr/mL and 81.3 ng/mL, respectively, with 5 mg ertugliflozin once daily treatment, and 1,193 ng·hr/mL and 268 ng/mL, respectively, with 15 mg ertugliflozin once daily treatment. Steady-state is reached after 4 to 6 days of once-daily dosing with ertugliflozin. Ertugliflozin does not exhibit time-dependent pharmacokinetics and accumulates in plasma up to 10-40% following multiple dosing.
Sitagliptin
The pharmacokinetics of sitagliptin have been extensively characterized in healthy subjects and patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. After oral administration of a 100-mg dose to healthy subjects, sitagliptin was rapidly absorbed, with peak plasma concentrations (median Tmax) occurring 1 to 4 hours postdose. Plasma AUC of sitagliptin increased in a dose proportional manner. Following a single oral 100-mg dose to healthy volunteers, mean plasma AUC of sitagliptin was 8.52 μM•hr, Cmax was 950 nM, and apparent terminal half-life (t1/2) was 12.4 hours. Plasma AUC of sitagliptin increased approximately 14% following 100-mg doses at steady state compared to the first dose. The intra subject and inter subject coefficients of variation for sitagliptin AUC were small (5.8% and 15.1%). The pharmacokinetics of sitagliptin was generally similar in healthy subjects and in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Absorption
STEGLUJAN
The effects of a high-fat meal on the pharmacokinetics of ertugliflozin and sitagliptin when administered as STEGLUJAN tablets are comparable to those reported for the individual tablets.
Administration of STEGLUJAN with food decreased ertugliflozin Cmax by 29% and had no meaningful effect on ertugliflozin AUCinf, and on sitagliptin AUCinf and Cmax.
Ertugliflozin
Following single-dose oral administration of 5 mg and 15 mg of ertugliflozin, peak plasma concentrations of ertugliflozin occur at 1 hour postdose (median Tmax) under fasted conditions. Plasma Cmax and AUC of ertugliflozin increase in a dose-proportional manner following single doses from 0.5 mg (0.1 times the lowest recommended dose) to 300 mg (20 times the highest recommended dose) and following multiple doses from 1 mg (0.2 times the lowest recommended dose) to 100 mg (6.7 times the highest recommended dose). The absolute oral bioavailability of ertugliflozin following administration of a 15 mg dose is approximately 100%.
Effect of Food
Administration of ertugliflozin with a high-fat and high-calorie meal decreases ertugliflozin Cmax by 29% and prolongs Tmax by 1 hour, but does not alter AUC as compared with the fasted state. The observed effect of food on ertugliflozin pharmacokinetics is not considered clinically relevant, and ertugliflozin may be administered with or without food. In Phase 3 clinical trials, ertugliflozin was administered without regard to meals.
Sitagliptin
The absolute bioavailability of sitagliptin is approximately 87%. Because coadministration of a high fat meal with sitagliptin had no effect on the pharmacokinetics, sitagliptin may be administered with or without food.
Distribution
Ertugliflozin
The mean steady-state volume of distribution of ertugliflozin following an intravenous dose is 85.5 L. Plasma protein binding of ertugliflozin is 93.6% and is independent of ertugliflozin plasma concentrations. Plasma protein binding is not meaningfully altered in patients with renal or hepatic impairment. The bloodto- plasma concentration ratio of ertugliflozin is 0.66.
Sitagliptin
The mean volume of distribution at steady state following a single 100-mg intravenous dose of sitagliptin to healthy subjects is approximately 198 L. The fraction of sitagliptin reversibly bound to plasma proteins is low (38%).
Elimination
Metabolism
Ertugliflozin
Metabolism is the primary clearance mechanism for ertugliflozin. The major metabolic pathway for ertugliflozin is UGT1A9 and UGT2B7-mediated O-glucuronidation to two glucuronides that are pharmacologically inactive at clinically relevant concentrations. CYP-mediated (oxidative) metabolism of ertugliflozin is minimal (12%).
Sitagliptin
Approximately 79% of sitagliptin is excreted unchanged in the urine with metabolism being a minor pathway of elimination.
Following a [14C]sitagliptin oral dose, approximately 16% of the radioactivity was excreted as metabolites of sitagliptin. Six metabolites were detected at trace levels and are not expected to contribute to the plasma DPP-4 inhibitory activity of sitagliptin. In vitro studies indicated that the primary enzyme responsible for the limited metabolism of sitagliptin was CYP3A4, with contribution from CYP2C8.
Excretion
Ertugliflozin
The mean systemic plasma clearance following an intravenous 100 μg dose was 11.2 L/hr. The mean elimination half-life in type 2 diabetic patients with normal renal function was estimated to be 16.6 hours based on the population pharmacokinetic analysis. Following administration of an oral [14C]-ertugliflozin solution to healthy subjects, approximately 40.9% and 50.2% of the drug-related radioactivity was eliminated in feces and urine, respectively. Only 1.5% of the administered dose was excreted as unchanged ertugliflozin in urine and 33.8% as unchanged ertugliflozin in feces, which is likely due to biliary excretion of glucuronide metabolites and subsequent hydrolysis to parent.
Sitagliptin
Following administration of an oral [14C]sitagliptin dose to healthy subjects, approximately 100% of the administered radioactivity was eliminated in feces (13%) or urine (87%) within one week of dosing. The apparent terminal t1/2 following a 100-mg oral dose of sitagliptin was approximately 12.4 hours and renal clearance was approximately 350 mL/min.
Elimination of sitagliptin occurs primarily via renal excretion and involves active tubular secretion. Sitagliptin is a substrate for human organic anion transporter-3 (hOAT-3), which may be involved in the renal elimination of sitagliptin. The clinical relevance of hOAT-3 in sitagliptin transport has not been established. Sitagliptin is also a substrate of p-glycoprotein, which may also be involved in mediating the renal elimination of sitagliptin. However, cyclosporine, a p-glycoprotein inhibitor, did not reduce the renal clearance of sitagliptin.
Specific Populations
Patients With Renal Impairment
STEGLUJAN
Studies characterizing the pharmacokinetics of ertugliflozin and sitagliptin after administration of STEGLUJAN in renally impaired patients have not been performed [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION].
Ertugliflozin
In a clinical pharmacology study in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment (as determined by eGFR), following a single-dose administration of 15 mg ertugliflozin, the mean increases in AUC of ertugliflozin were 1.6-, 1.7-, and 1.6-fold, respectively, for mild, moderate and severe renally-impaired patients, compared to subjects with normal renal function. These increases in ertugliflozin AUC are not considered clinically meaningful. The 24-hour urinary glucose excretion declined with increasing severity of renal impairment [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS and Use In Specific Populations]. The plasma protein binding of ertugliflozin was unaffected in patients with renal impairment.
Sitagliptin
An approximately 2-fold increase in the plasma AUC of sitagliptin was observed in patients with moderate renal impairment with eGFR of 30 to less than 45 mL/min/1.73 m2, and an approximately 4-fold increase was observed in patients with severe renal impairment, including patients with ESRD on hemodialysis, as compared to normal healthy control subjects.
Patients With Hepatic Impairment
Ertugliflozin
Moderate hepatic impairment (based on the Child-Pugh classification) did not result in an increase in exposure of ertugliflozin. The AUC of ertugliflozin decreased by approximately 13%, and Cmax decreased by approximately 21% compared to subjects with normal hepatic function. This decrease in ertugliflozin exposure is not considered clinically meaningful. There is no clinical experience in patients with Child-Pugh class C (severe) hepatic impairment. The plasma protein binding of ertugliflozin was unaffected in patients with moderate hepatic impairment [see Use In Specific Populations].
Sitagliptin
In patients with moderate hepatic insufficiency (Child Pugh score 7 to 9), mean AUC and Cmax of sitagliptin increased approximately 21% and 13%, respectively, compared to healthy matched controls following administration of a single 100-mg dose of sitagliptin. These differences are not considered to be clinically meaningful. No dosage adjustment for sitagliptin is necessary for patients with mild or moderate hepatic insufficiency.
There is no clinical experience in patients with severe hepatic insufficiency (Child Pugh score >9) [see Use In Specific Populations].
Effects Of Age, Body Weight/ Body Mass Index (BMI), Gender, And Race
Ertugliflozin
Based on a population pharmacokinetic analysis, age, body weight, gender, and race do not have a clinically meaningful effect on the pharmacokinetics of ertugliflozin.
Sitagliptin
Based on a population pharmacokinetic analysis or a composite analysis of available pharmacokinetic data, BMI, gender, and race do not have a clinically meaningful effect on the pharmacokinetics of sitagliptin. When the effects of age on renal function are taken into account, age alone did not have a clinically meaningful impact on the pharmacokinetics of sitagliptin based on a population pharmacokinetic analysis. Elderly subjects (65 to 80 years) had approximately 19% higher plasma concentrations of sitagliptin compared to younger subjects.
Drug Interaction Studies
STEGLUJAN
Coadministration of single dose of ertugliflozin (15 mg) and sitagliptin (100 mg) did not meaningfully alter the pharmacokinetics of either ertugliflozin or metformin in healthy subjects. Pharmacokinetic drug interaction studies with STEGLUJAN have not been performed; however, such studies have been conducted with ertugliflozin and sitagliptin, the individual components of STEGLUJAN.
Ertugliflozin
In Vitro Assessment of Drug Interactions
In in vitro studies, ertugliflozin and ertugliflozin glucuronides did not inhibit CYP450 isoenzymes (CYPs) 1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2C8, 2B6, 2D6, or 3A4, and did not induce CYPs 1A2, 2B6, or 3A4. Ertugliflozin was not a time-dependent inhibitor of CYP3A in vitro. Ertugliflozin did not inhibit UGT1A6, 1A9, or 2B7 in vitro and was a weak inhibitor (IC50 >39 μM) of UGT1A1 and 1A4. Ertugliflozin glucuronides did not inhibit UGT1A1, 1A4, 1A6, 1A9, or 2B7 in vitro. Overall, ertugliflozin is unlikely to affect the pharmacokinetics of drugs eliminated by these enzymes. Ertugliflozin is a substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) transporters and is not a substrate of organic anion transporters (OAT1, OAT3), organic cation transporters (OCT1, OCT2), or organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATP1B1, OATP1B3). Ertugliflozin or ertugliflozin glucuronides do not meaningfully inhibit P-gp, OCT2, OAT1, or OAT3 transporters, or transporting polypeptides OATP1B1 and OATP1B3, at clinically relevant concentrations. Overall, ertugliflozin is unlikely to affect the pharmacokinetics of concurrently administered medications that are substrates of these transporters.
In Vivo Assessment of Drug Interactions
No dose adjustment of STEGLUJAN is recommended when coadministered with commonly prescribed medicinal products. Ertugliflozin pharmacokinetics were similar with and without coadministration of metformin, glimepiride, sitagliptin, and simvastatin in healthy subjects (see Figure 1). Coadministration of ertugliflozin with multiple doses of 600 mg once daily rifampin (an inducer of UGT and CYP enzymes) resulted in approximately 39% and 15% mean reductions in ertugliflozin AUC and Cmax, respectively, relative to ertugliflozin administered alone. These changes in exposure are not considered clinically relevant. Ertugliflozin had no clinically relevant effect on the pharmacokinetics of metformin, glimepiride, sitagliptin, and simvastatin when coadministered in healthy subjects (see Figure 2). Physiologically-based PK (PBPK) modeling suggests that coadministration of mefenamic acid (UGT inhibitor) may increase the AUC and Cmax of ertugliflozin by 1.51- and 1.19-fold, respectively. These predicted changes in exposure are not considered clinically relevant.
Figure 1: Effects of Other Drugs on the Pharmacokinetics of Ertugliflozin
Figure 2: Effects of Ertugliflozin on the Pharmacokinetics of Other Drugs
Sitagliptin
In VitroAssessment of Drug Interactions
Sitagliptin is not an inhibitor of CYP isozymes CYP3A4, 2C8, 2C9, 2D6, 1A2, 2C19 or 2B6, and is not an inducer of CYP3A4. Sitagliptin is a p-glycoprotein substrate, but does not inhibit p-glycoprotein mediated transport of digoxin. Based on these results, sitagliptin is considered unlikely to cause interactions with other drugs that utilize these pathways.
Sitagliptin is not extensively bound to plasma proteins. Therefore, the propensity of sitagliptin to be involved in clinically meaningful drug-drug interactions mediated by plasma protein binding displacement is very low.
In Vivo Assessment of Drug Interactions
Table 4: Effect of Coadministered Drugs on Systemic Exposure of Sitagliptin
| Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug* |
Dose of Sitagliptin* |
Geometric Mean Ratio
(ratio with/without coadministered drug)
No Effect = 1.00 |
|
AUC† |
Cmax |
| No dosing adjustments required for the following: |
| Cyclosporine |
600 mg once daily |
100 mg once daily |
Sitagliptin |
1.29 |
1.68 |
| Metformin |
1,000 mg‡ twice daily for 14 days |
50 mg‡ twice daily for 7 days |
Sitagliptin |
1.02§ |
1.05 |
* All doses administered as single dose unless otherwise specified.
† AUC is reported as AUC0-∞ unless otherwise specified.
‡ Multiple dose.
§ AUC0-12hr. |
Table 5: Effect of Sitagliptin on Systemic Exposure of Coadministered Drugs
| Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug* |
Dose of Sitagliptin* |
Geometric Mean Ratio
(ratio with/without sitagliptin)
No Effect = 1.00 |
|
AUC† |
Cmax |
| No dosing adjustments required for the following: |
| Digoxin |
0.25 mg‡ once daily for 10 days |
100 mg‡ once daily for 10 days |
Digoxin |
1.11§ |
1.18 |
| Glyburide |
1.25 mg |
200 mg‡ once daily for 6 days |
Glyburide |
1.09 |
1.01 |
| Simvastatin |
20 mg |
200 mg‡ once daily for 5 days |
Simvastatin |
0.85¶ |
0.80 |
| Simvastatin Acid |
1.12¶ |
1.06 |
| Rosiglitazone |
4 mg |
200 mg‡ once daily for 5 days |
Rosiglitazone |
0.98 |
0.99 |
| Warfarin |
30 mg single dose on day 5 |
200 mg‡ once daily for 11 days |
S(-) Warfarin |
0.95 |
0.89 |
| R(+) Warfarin |
0.99 |
0.89 |
| Ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone |
21 days once daily of 35 µg ethinyl estradiol with norethindrone 0.5 mg x 7 days, 0.75 mg x 7 days, 1.0 mg x 7 days |
200 mg‡ once daily for 21 days |
Ethinyl estradiol |
0.99 |
0.97 |
| Norethindrone |
1.03 |
0.98 |
| Metformin |
1,000 mg‡ twice daily for 14 days |
50 mg‡ twice daily for 7 days |
Metformin |
1.02# |
0.97 |
* All doses administered as single dose unless otherwise specified. The 200 mg dose is 2 times the maximum recommended daily dose of sitagliptin.
† AUC is reported as AUC0-∞ unless otherwise specified.
‡ Multiple dose.
§ AUC0-24hr.
¶ AUC0-last.
# AUC0-12hr. |
Clinical Studies
Glycemic Control Trials In Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
The efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin in combination with sitagliptin have been studied in 3 multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active comparator-controlled, clinical studies involving 1,985 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. These studies included white, Hispanic, black, Asian, and other racial and ethnic groups, and patients with an age range of 21 to 85 years.
In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, treatment with ertugliflozin in combination with sitagliptin reduced HbA1c compared to placebo or active comparator.
In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with ertugliflozin in combination with sitagliptin, the change in HbA1c was generally similar across subgroups defined by age, sex, and race.
In Combination With Sitagliptin Versus Ertugliflozin Alone And Sitagliptin Alone, As Add-On To Metformin
A total of 1,233 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequate glycemic control (HbA1c between 7.5% and 11%) on metformin monotherapy (≥1,500 mg/day for ≥8 weeks) participated in a randomized, double-blind, 26-week, active controlled study (NCT02099110) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin 5 mg or 15 mg in combination with sitagliptin 100 mg compared to the individual components. Patients were randomized to one of five treatment arms: ertugliflozin 5 mg, ertugliflozin 15 mg, sitagliptin 100 mg, ertugliflozin 5 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg, or ertugliflozin 15 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg.
At Week 26, ertugliflozin 5 mg or 15 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg provided statistically significantly greater reductions in HbA1c compared to the individual components. More patients achieved an HbA1c < 7% on the combination as compared to the individual components (see Table 6 and Figure 3).
Table 6: Results at Week 26 from a Factorial Study with Ertugliflozin and Sitagliptin as Add-on Combination Therapy with Metformin Compared to Individual Components Alone*
|
Sitagliptin
100 mg |
Ertugliflozin
5 mg |
Ertugliflozin
15 mg |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg
+Sitagliptin 100 mg |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg
+ Sitagliptin 100 mg |
| HbA1c (%) |
N = 242 |
N = 244 |
N = 247 |
N = 237 |
N = 241 |
| Baseline (mean) |
8.5 |
8.6 |
8.6 |
8.6 |
8.6 |
| Change from baseline (LS mean†) |
-1.0 |
-1.0 |
-1.0 |
-1.4 |
-1.4 |
| Difference from |
|
|
|
|
|
| Sitagliptin |
|
|
|
-0.4‡
(-0.6, -0.2) |
-0.4‡
(-0.5, -0.2) |
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg |
|
|
|
-0.4‡
(-0.5, -0.2) |
|
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg |
|
|
|
|
-0.4‡
(-0.6, -0.2) |
| (LS mean†, 95% CI) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Patients [N (%)] with HbA1c <7% |
93 (38.5) |
72 (29.3) |
83 (33.7) |
126 (53.3) |
123 (50.9) |
| FPG (mg/dL) |
N = 246 |
N = 250 |
N = 247 |
N = 240 |
N = 241 |
| Baseline (mean) |
177.4 |
184.1 |
179.5 |
183.8 |
177.2 |
| Change from baseline (LS mean†) |
-24.3 |
-34.0 |
-34.6 |
-41.1 |
-44.3 |
| Difference from |
|
|
|
|
|
| Sitagliptin |
|
|
|
-16.8‡
(-23.2, -10.4) |
-20.0‡
(-26.4, -13.6) |
| Ertugliflozin 5 mg |
|
|
|
-7.0§
(-13.3, -0.7) |
|
| Ertugliflozin 15 mg |
|
|
|
|
-9.8§
(-16.1, -3.4) |
| (LS mean†, 95% CI) |
|
|
|
|
|
* N includes all randomized and treated patients with a baseline measurement of the outcome variable. At Week 26 the primary HbA1c endpoint was missing for 13%, 10%, 11%, 11%, and 12% of patients and during the trial rescue medication was initiated by 6%, 6%, 3%, 2%, and 0% of patients randomized to sitagliptin, ertugliflozin 5 mg, ertugliflozin 15 mg, ertugliflozin 5 mg + sitagliptin, and ertugliflozin 15 mg + sitagliptin, respectively. Missing Week 26 measurements were imputed using multiple imputation with a mean equal to the baseline value of the patient. Results included measurements collected after initiation of rescue medication. For those subjects who did not receive rescue medication and had values measured at 26 weeks, the mean change from baseline for HbA1c was -1.1%, - 1.1%, -1.1%, -1.5% and -1.6% for sitagliptin, ertugliflozin 5 mg, ertugliflozin 15 mg, ertugliflozin 5 mg + sitagliptin, and ertugliflozin 15 mg + sitagliptin, respectively.
† Intent-to-treat analysis using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline value and baseline eGFR.
‡ p<0.001 compared to control group.
§ p<0.03 compared to control group. |
The mean baseline body weight was 89.8 kg, 88.6 kg, 88.0 kg, 89.5 kg, and 87.5 kg in the sitagliptin 100 mg, ertugliflozin 5 mg, ertugliflozin 15 mg, ertugliflozin 5 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg groups, respectively. The mean changes from baseline to Week 26 were -0.4 kg, -2.6 kg, -3.4 kg, -2.4 kg, and -2.7 kg in the sitagliptin 100 mg, ertugliflozin 5 mg, ertugliflozin 15 mg, ertugliflozin 5 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg groups, respectively. The difference from sitagliptin 100 mg (95% CI) for ertugliflozin 5 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg was -1.9 kg (-2.6, -1.3) and for ertugliflozin 15 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg was -2.3 kg (-3.0, -1.6).
The mean baseline systolic blood pressure was 128.4 mmHg, 129.7 mmHg, 128.9 mmHg, 130.2 mmHg, and 129.1 mmHg in the sitagliptin 100 mg, ertugliflozin 5 mg, ertugliflozin 15 mg, ertugliflozin 5 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg groups, respectively. The mean changes from baseline to Week 26 were -0.5 mmHg, -4.0 mmHg, -3.6 mmHg, -2.8 mmHg, and -3.4 mmHg in the sitagliptin 100 mg, ertugliflozin 5 mg, ertugliflozin 15 mg, ertugliflozin 5 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg groups, respectively. The difference from sitagliptin 100 mg (95% CI) for ertugliflozin 5 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg was -2.3 mmHg (-4.3, -0.4) and for ertugliflozin 15 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg was -2.9 mmHg (-4.8, -1.0).
Figure 3: HbA1c (%) Change over Time in a Factorial Study with Ertugliflozin and Sitagliptin as Add-on Combination Therapy with Metformin Compared to Individual Components Alone*
 |
*Data to the left of the vertical line are observed means (non-model-based) excluding values occurring post glycemic rescue.
Data to the right of the vertical line represent the final Week 26 data, including all values regardless of use of glycemic rescue medication and use of study drug, with missing Week 26 values imputed using multiple imputation (26-MI) with a mean equal to the baseline value of the patient (see Table 6). |
Ertugliflozin As Add-On Combination Therapy With Metformin And Sitagliptin
A total of 463 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled (HbA1c between 7% and 10.5%) on metformin (≥1,500 mg/day for ≥8 weeks) and sitagliptin 100 mg once daily participated in a randomized, double-blind, multi-center, 26-week, placebo-controlled study (NCT02036515) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin. Patients entered a 2-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period and were randomized to placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg, or ertugliflozin 15 mg.
At Week 26, treatment with ertugliflozin at 5 mg or 15 mg daily provided statistically significant reductions in in HbA1c. Ertugliflozin also resulted in a higher proportion of patients achieving an HbA1c <7% compared to placebo (see Table 7).
Table 7: Results at Week 26 from an Add-on Study of Ertugliflozin in Combination with Metformin and Sitagliptin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus*
|
Placebo |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg |
| HbA1c (%) |
N = 152 |
N = 155 |
N = 152 |
| Baseline (mean) |
8.0 |
8.1 |
8.0 |
| Change from baseline (LS mean†) |
-0.2 |
-0.7 |
-0.8 |
| Difference from placebo (LS mean† and 95% CI) |
|
-0.5‡
(-0.7, -0.3) |
-0.6‡
(-0.8, -0.4) |
| Patients [N (%)] with HbA1c <7% |
31 (20.2) |
54 (34.6) |
64 (42.3) |
| FPG (mg/dL) |
N = 152 |
N = 156 |
N = 152 |
| Baseline (mean) |
169.6 |
167.7 |
171.7 |
| Change from baseline (LS mean†) |
-6.5 |
-25.7 |
-32.1 |
| Difference from placebo (LS mean†, 95% CI) |
|
-19.2‡
(-26.8, -11.6) |
-25.6‡
(-33.2, -18.0) |
* N includes all randomized and treated patients with a baseline measurement of the outcome variable. At Week 26, the primary HbA1c endpoint was missing for 10%, 11%, and 7% of patients and during the trial, rescue medication was initiated by 16%, 1%, and 2% of patients randomized to placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg, respectively. Missing Week 26 measurements were imputed using multiple imputation with a mean equal to the baseline value of the patient. Results included measurements collected after initiation of rescue medication. For those patients who did not receive rescue medication and had values measured at 26 weeks, the mean changes from baseline for HbA1c were -0.2%, -0.8%, and -0.9% for placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg, respectively.
† Intent-to-treat analysis using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline value, prior antihyperglycemic medication and baseline eGFR.
‡ p<0.001 compared to placebo. |
The mean baseline body weight was 86.5 kg, 87.6 kg, and 86.6 kg in the placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg groups, respectively. The mean changes from baseline to Week 26 were -1.0 kg, -3.0 kg, and -2.8 kg in the placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg and ertugliflozin 15 mg groups, respectively. The difference from placebo (95% CI) for ertugliflozin 5 mg was -1.9 kg (-2.6, -1.3) and for ertugliflozin 15 mg was -1.8 kg (-2.4, -1.2).
The mean baseline systolic blood pressure was 130.2 mmHg, 132.1 mmHg, and 131.6 mmHg in the placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg groups, respectively. The mean changes from baseline to Week 26 were -0.2 mmHg, -3.8 mmHg, and -4.5 mmHg in the placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg and ertugliflozin 15 mg groups, respectively. The difference from placebo (95% CI) for ertugliflozin 5 mg was -3.7 mmHg (-6.1, -1.2) and for ertugliflozin 15 mg was -4.3 mmHg (-6.7, -1.9).
Initial Combination Therapy Of Ertugliflozin And Sitagliptin
A total of 291 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled (HbA1c between 8% and 10.5%) on diet and exercise participated in a randomized, double-blind, multi-center, placebo-controlled 26-week study (NCT02226003) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin in combination with sitagliptin. These patients, who were not receiving any background antihyperglycemic treatment for ≥8 weeks, entered a 2-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period and were randomized to placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg, ertugliflozin 15 mg in combination with sitagliptin (100 mg), once daily.
At Week 26, treatment with ertugliflozin 5 mg and 15 mg in combination with sitagliptin at 100 mg daily provided statistically significant reductions in HbA1c compared to placebo. Ertugliflozin 5 mg and 15 mg in combination with sitagliptin at 100 mg daily also resulted in a higher proportion of patients achieving an HbA1c <7% compared with placebo (see Table 8).
Table 8: Results at Week 26 from an Initial Combination Therapy Study of Ertugliflozin and Sitagliptin*
|
Placebo |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg
+ Sitagliptin 100 mg |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg
+ Sitagliptin 100 mg |
| HbA1c (%) |
N = 96 |
N = 98 |
N = 96 |
| Baseline (mean) |
9.0 |
8.9 |
9.0 |
| Change from baseline (LS mean†) |
-0.6 |
-1.6 |
-1.5 |
| Difference from placebo (LS mean† and 95% CI) |
|
-1.0‡
(-1.3, -0.7) |
-0.9‡
(-1.3, -0.6) |
| Patients [N (%)] with HbA1c <7% |
9 (9.3) |
36 (37.1) |
32 (32.9) |
| FPG (mg/dL) |
N = 96 |
N = 98 |
N = 96 |
| Baseline (mean) |
207.5 |
198.0 |
187.7 |
| Change from baseline (LS mean†) |
-11.8 |
-47.1 |
-50.8 |
| Difference from placebo (LS mean†, 95% CI) |
|
-35.4‡
(-47.3, -23.4) |
-39.1‡
(-51.4, -26.8) |
* N includes all randomized and treated patients with a baseline measurement of the outcome variable. At Week 26 the primary HbA1c endpoint was missing for 22%, 7% and 10% of patients and during the trial rescue medication was initiated by 32%, 6%, and 0% of patients randomized to placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg and ertugliflozin 15 mg, respectively. Missing Week 26 measurements were imputed using multiple imputation with a mean equal to the baseline value of the patient. Results included measurements collected after initiation of rescue medication. For those subjects who did not receive rescue medication and had values measured at 26 weeks, the mean change from baseline for HbA1c was -0.8%, -1.7%, -1.7% for placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg and ertugliflozin 15 mg, respectively.
† Intent-to-treat analysis using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline value, prior antihyperglycemic medication and baseline eGFR.
‡ p<0.001 compared to placebo. |
The mean baseline body weight was 95.0 kg, 90.8 kg, and 91.2 kg in the placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg groups, respectively. The mean changes from baseline to Week 26 were -0.5 kg, -2.7 kg, and -2.8 kg in the placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg groups, respectively. The difference from placebo (95% CI) for ertugliflozin 5 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg was -2.1 kg (-3.1, -1.2) and for ertugliflozin 15 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg was -2.3 kg (-3.3, -1.3).
The mean baseline systolic blood pressure was 127.4 mmHg, 130.7 mmHg, and 129.2 mmHg in the placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg groups, respectively. The mean changes from baseline to Week 26 were 1.6 mmHg, -2.4 mmHg, and -3.5 mmHg in the placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg, respectively. The difference from placebo (95% CI) for ertugliflozin 5 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg was -4.0 mmHg (-7.2, -0.8) and for ertugliflozin 15 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg was -5.2 mmHg (-8.4, -1.9).
Ertugliflozin Cardiovascular Outcomes In Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus And Established Cardiovascular Disease
The effect of ertugliflozin on cardiovascular risk in adult patients with type 2 diabetes and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease was evaluated in the VERTIS CV study (NCT01986881), a multicenter, multi-national, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, event driven trial. The study compared the risk of experiencing a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) between ertugliflozin and placebo when these were added to and used concomitantly with standard of care treatments for diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
A total of 8246 patients were randomized (placebo N=2747, ertugliflozin 5 mg N=2752, ertugliflozin 15 mg N=2747) and followed for a median of 3 years. Approximately 88% of the study population was Caucasian, 6% Asian, and 3% Black. The mean age was 64 years and approximately 70% were male.
All patients in the study had inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus at baseline (HbA1c greater than or equal to 7%). The mean duration of type 2 diabetes mellitus was 13 years, the mean HbA1c at baseline was 8.2% and the mean eGFR was 76 mL/min/1.73 m2. At baseline, patients were treated with one (32%) or more (67%) antidiabetic medications including biguanides (metformin) (76%), insulin (47%), sulfonylureas (41%), DPP-4 inhibitors (11%) and GLP-1 receptor agonists (3%).
Almost all patients (99%) had established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease at baseline including: a documented history of coronary artery disease (76%), cerebrovascular disease (23%) or peripheral artery disease (19%). Approximately 24% patients had a history of heart failure (HF). At baseline, the mean systolic blood pressure was 133 mmHg, the mean diastolic blood pressure was 77 mmHg, the mean LDL was 89 mg/dL, and the mean HDL was 44 mg/dL. At baseline, approximately 81% of patients were treated with renin angiotensin system inhibitors, 69% with beta-blockers, 43% with diuretics, 82% with statins, 4% with ezetimibe, and 89% with antiplatelet agents.
The primary endpoint in VERTIS CV was the time to first occurrence of a Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE). A major adverse cardiovascular event was defined as occurrence of either a cardiovascular death or a nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) or a nonfatal stroke. The statistical analysis plan pre-specified that the 5 and 15 mg doses would be combined for the analysis. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to test for non-inferiority against the pre-specified risk margin of 1.3 for the hazard ratio of MACE. Type I error was controlled across multiple tests using a hierarchical testing strategy.
The incidence rate of MACE was similar between the ertugliflozin-treated and placebo-treated patients. The estimated hazard ratio of MACE associated with ertugliflozin relative to placebo was 0.97 with 95.6% confidence interval (0.85, 1.11). The upper bound of this confidence interval excluded a risk larger than 1.3. (Table 9). Results for the 5 mg and 15 mg doses were consistent with results for the combined dose group.
Table 9: Analysis of MACE and its Components from the VERTIS-CV Study*
| Endpoint† |
Placebo (N=2747) |
Ertugliflozin (N=5499) |
Hazard Ratiovs Placebo
(CI) ‡ |
| N (%) |
Event Rate
(per 100 person years) |
N (%) |
Event Rate
(per 100 person years) |
| MACE (CV death, non-fatalMI, or non-fatal stroke) Composite |
327 (11.9) |
4.0 |
653 (11.9) |
3.9 |
0.97
(0.85, 1.11) |
| Components of Composite Endpoint |
| Non-fatal MI |
148 (5.4) |
1.6 |
310 (5.6) |
1.7 |
1.04
(0.86, 1.27) |
| Non-fatal Stroke |
78 (2.8) |
0.8 |
157 (2.9) |
0.8 |
1.00
(0.76, 1.32) |
| CV death |
184 (6.7) |
1.9 |
341 (6.2) |
1.8 |
0.92
(0.77, 1.11) |
N=Number of patients, CI=Confidence interval, CV=Cardiovascular, MI=Myocardial infarction.
* Intent-to-treat analysis set.
† MACE was evaluated in subjects who took at least one dose of study medication and, for subjects who discontinued study medication prior to the end of the study, censored events that occurred more than 365 days after the last dose of study medication. Other endpoints were evaluated using all randomized subjects and events that occurred any time after the first dose of study medication until the last contact date. The total number of first events was analyzed for each endpoint.
‡ HR and CI are based on Cox proportional hazards regression model, stratified by cohorts. |