Clinical Pharmacology for Spevigo
Mechanism Of Action
Spesolimab-sbzo is a humanized monoclonal immunoglobulin G1 antibody that inhibits interleukin-36 (IL-36) signaling by specifically binding to the IL36R. Binding of spesolimab-sbzo to IL36R prevents the subsequent activation of IL36R by its ligands (IL-36 α, β and γ) and downstream activation of pro-inflammatory and proÂfibrotic pathways. The precise mechanism linking reduced IL36R activity and the treatment of flares of GPP is unclear.
Pharmacodynamics
The pharmacodynamics of SPEVIGO in the treatment of patients with GPP have not been fully characterized.
Pharmacokinetics
A population pharmacokinetic model was developed based on data collected from healthy subjects, patients with GPP, and patients with other diseases. After a single intravenous dose of 900 mg of SPEVIGO, the population PK model-estimated AUC0-∞(95% CI) and Cmax (95% CI) in a typical anti-drug antibody (ADA)Ânegative patient with GPP were 4750 (4510, 4970) mcg·day/mL and 238 (218, 256) mcg/mL, respectively. After subcutaneous SPEVIGO 600 mg LD followed by 300 mg every 4 weeks, the mean steady-state trough concentration ranged from 33.4 mcg/mL to 42.3 mcg/mL.
When administered intravenously, spesolimab-sbzo AUC increased dose-proportionally from 0.3 to 20 mg/kg, and CL and terminal half-life were independent of dose. Following subcutaneous single dose administration, spesolimab-sbzo exposure increased slightly more than dose-proportionally across the dose range of 150 mg to 600 mg due to increased bioavailability at higher doses.
Absorption
Following subcutaneous single dose administration of SPEVIGO in healthy volunteers, peak plasma concentrations were achieved between 5.5 to 7 days after dosing. After subcutaneous administration in the abdomen, absolute bioavailability (90% CI) was slightly higher at higher doses with estimated values of 58 (51, 66)%, 65 (60, 69)%, and 72 (65, 79)% at 150 mg, 300 mg, and 600 mg, respectively. Based on limited data, absolute bioavailability (90% CI) in the thigh was approximately 85 (77, 94)% following a subcutaneous dose of 300 mg SPEVIGO.
Distribution
Based on the population pharmacokinetic analysis, the typical total volume of distribution at steady state was 6.4 L.
Elimination
Metabolism
The metabolic pathway of spesolimab-sbzo has not been characterized. As a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody, spesolimab-sbzo is expected to be degraded into small peptides and amino acids via catabolic pathways in a manner similar to endogenous IgG.
Excretion
In the linear dose range (0.3 to 20 mg/kg), based on the population PK model, spesolimab-sbzo clearance (95% CI)in a typical GPP patient without ADA, weighing 70 kg was 0.184 (0.175, 0.194) L/day. The terminal half-life was 25.5 (24.4, 26.3) days.
Specific Populations
Age, Gender, And Race
Based on population pharmacokinetic analyses, age, gender, and race did not have an effect on the pharmacokinetics of spesolimab-sbzo.
Hepatic And Renal Impairment
As a monoclonal antibody, spesolimab-sbzo is not expected to undergo hepatic or renal elimination. No formal study of the effect of hepatic or renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of spesolimab-sbzo was conducted.
Body Weight
Spesolimab-sbzo concentrations were increased in subjects with lower body weight and decreased in subjects with higher body weight. The clinical impact of body weight on spesolimab-sbzo plasma concentrations is unknown.
Pediatric Patients
The pharmacokinetics of spesolimab-sbzo have not been studied in pediatric subjects below the age of 12 years. The plasma pharmacokinetics of spesolimab-sbzo observed in pediatric subjects 12 years of age and older and weighing 40 kg or more following subcutaneous administration were consistent with that observed in adults.
Drug Interaction Studies
No formal drug interactions studies have been conducted with spesolimab-sbzo. In patients with GPP, spesolimab-sbzo is not expected to cause cytokine-mediated CYP interactions as a perpetrator.
Immunogenicity
The observed incidence of anti-drug antibodies is highly dependent on the sensitivity and specificity of the assay. Differences in assay methods preclude meaningful comparisons of the incidence of anti-drug antibodies in the studies described below with the incidence of anti-drug antibodies in other studies, including those of spesolimab-sbzo or of other spesolimab products.
In subjects with GPP treated with intravenous SPEVIGO in Study Effisayil-1, ADAs formed with a median onset of 2.3 weeks. Following administration of 900 mg intravenous SPEVIGO, (12/50) 24% of subjects had a maximum ADA titer greater than 4000 and were neutralizing antibody (Nab)-positive by the end of the study (Weeks 12 to 17). In Study Effisayil-2, ADAs formed with a median onset of 8 weeks. Following administration of a 600 mg subcutaneous LD of SPEVIGO followed by 300 mg every 4 weeks for a total duration of 48 weeks, 24% of subjects had a maximum ADA titer greater than 4000 and were Nab-positive.
In Study Effisayil-1 following intravenous SPEVIGO, females appeared to have higher immunogenicity response; the percentage of subjects with ADA titer greater than 4000 was 30% in females, and 12% in males, respectively. In Study Effisayil-2 following administration of subcutaneous SPEVIGO, the data on immunogenicity response in males versus females were inconclusive.
Anti-Drug Antibody Effects on Pharmacokinetics In subjects with ADA titers below 4000, there was no apparent impact on spesolimab-sbzo pharmacokinetics. In some subjects with ADA titer values greater than 4000, plasma spesolimab-sbzo concentrations were significantly reduced after reaching this ADA titer.
In Study Effisayil-1, there are limited data on the impact of ADAs on safety and efficacy upon retreatment as the majority of subjects did not experience a subsequent, new flare in an open-label extension study.
In subjects who received SPEVIGO 600 mg subcutaneous LD followed by 300 mg every 4 weeks in Study Effisayil-2, the mean trough concentrations beginning at Week 8 in ADA-positive subjects with titers greater than 4000 were approximately 77% to 107% of trough concentrations in subjects who were ADA-negative or ADA-positive with titer values less than 4000. After subcutaneous administration of SPEVIGO, there appears to be no impact of ADA presence on efficacy. This observation is based on limited numbers of ADA-positive subjects (N = 11). There are insufficient data to assess whether there is a clinically significant effect of ADAs on the safety of spesolimab-sbzo.
Clinical Studies
Intravenous SPEVIGO For Treatment Of GPP Flare (Study Effisayil-1)
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (Study Effisayil-1) [NCT03782792] was conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of intravenous SPEVIGO in adult subjects with flares of generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP). Subjects were randomized if they had a flare of GPP of moderate-to-severe intensity, as defined by:
- A Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPPGA) total score of at least 3 (moderate) [the total GPPPGA score ranges from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe)],
- The presence of fresh pustules (new appearance or worsening of pustules),
- GPPPGA pustulation sub score of at least 2 (mild), and
- At least 5% of body surface area covered with erythema and the presence of pustules.
Subjects were required to discontinue systemic and topical therapy for GPP prior to receiving study drug.
A total of 53 subjects were randomized (2:1) to receive a single intravenous dose of 900 mg SPEVIGO (N=35) or placebo (N=18) (administered over 90 minutes) during the double-blind portion of the study.
The study population consisted of 32% male and 68% female. The mean age was 43 years (range: 21 to 69 years); 55% of subjects were Asian and 45% were White. For ethnicity, there were no subjects that identified as Hispanic or Latino in the study. Most subjects included in the study had a GPPPGA pustulation sub score of 3 (43%) or 4 (36%), and subjects had a GPPPGA total score of 3 (81%) or 4 (19%). In this study, 25% of subjects had been previously treated with biologic therapy for GPP. At baseline acute flare, of the subjects with white blood cell count (WBC) assessments, 45% and 31% of subjects in the intravenous SPEVIGO and placebo groups, respectively, had (WBC) >12 x 109/L. Seventeen percent and 11% of subjects in the intravenous SPEVIGO and placebo groups, respectively, had temperature >38o Celsius. Of the subjects with WBC assessments, 12% and 6% of subjects in the SPEVIGO and placebo groups, respectively, had both WBC >12 x 109/L and temperature >38° Celsius [see ADVERSE REACTIONS].
The primary endpoint of the study was the proportion of subjects with a GPPPGA pustulation sub score of 0 (indicating no visible pustules) at Week 1 after treatment.
Clinical Response
The results of the primary endpoint are presented in Table 3.
Table 3 : GPPPGA Pustulation Sub Score at Week 1 in Adult Subjects with Flares of GPP in Study Effisayil-1 (Intravenous SPEVIGO)
|
Intravenous SPEVIGO
(N=35) |
Placebo
(N=18) |
| Subjects achieving a GPPPGA pustulation sub score of 0, n (%) |
19 (54) |
1 (6) |
| Risk difference versus placebo, % (95% CI) |
49 (21, 67) |
| GPPPGA = Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment |
In Study Effisayil-1, subjects in either treatment group who continued to experience flare symptoms at Week 1 were eligible to receive a single open-label intravenous dose of 900 mg of SPEVIGO (second dose and first dose for subjects in the SPEVIGO and placebo groups, respectively). At Week 1, 12 (34%) subjects and 15 subjects (83%) in the intravenous SPEVIGO and placebo groups, respectively, received open-label SPEVIGO. In subjects who were randomized to intravenous SPEVIGO and received an open-label dose of SPEVIGO at Week 1, 5 (42%) subjects had a GPPPGA pustulation sub score of 0 at Week 2 (one week after their second dose of SPEVIGO).
This study did not include sufficient numbers of subjects to determine if there are differences in response according to biological sex, age, race, baseline GPPPGA pustulation sub score, and baseline GPPPGA total score.
Subcutaneous SPEVIGO For Treatment Of GPP When Not Experiencing A Flare (Study Effisayil-2)
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (Study Effisayil-2) [NCT04399837] evaluated the efficacy and safety of SPEVIGO for subcutaneous administration in adults and pediatric subjects (12 years of age and older and weighing at least 40 kg) with a history of at least two GPP flares of moderate-to-severe intensity in the past. Subjects were randomized if they had a GPPPGA total score of 0 or 1 at screening and randomization. Subjects were required to discontinue systemic and topical therapy for GPP prior to or at randomization. These subjects must have had a history of flaring while on concomitant treatment for GPP or a history of flaring upon dose reduction or discontinuation of these concomitant medications.
A total of 123 subjects were randomized (1:1:1:1) to one of four treatment arms:
- SPEVIGO: 600 mg subcutaneous loading dose (LD) followed by 300 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks
- SPEVIGO: 600 mg subcutaneous LD followed by 300 mg subcutaneously every 12 weeks
- SPEVIGO: 300 mg subcutaneous LD followed by 150 mg subcutaneously every 12 weeks
- Placebo: subcutaneous LD followed by subcutaneous treatment every 4 weeks
While a 600 mg LD dose of SPEVIGO followed by 300 mg every 12 weeks dosage and a 300 mg LD of SPEVIGO followed by 150 mg every 12 weeks dosage were studied in Study Effisayil-2, these dosages are not approved. The recommended dosage of SPEVIGO for treatment of GPP when not experiencing a flare is a subcutaneous LD of 600 mg followed by 300 mg subcutaneously, administered every 4 weeks [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION]. The results summarized in Table 4 are those for the recommended dosage regimen.
The study population was 38% male and 62% female. The mean age was 40 years old (range: 14 to 75 years) with 8 (7%) pediatric subjects (2 per treatment arm); 64% of subjects were Asian and 36% were White. For ethnicity, 6% of subjects identified as Hispanic or Latino. Subjects included in the study had a GPPPGA pustulation sub score of 1 (28%) or 0 (72%), and subjects had a GPPPGA total score of 1 (86%) or 0 (14%). At the time of randomization, 75% of subjects were treated with systemic therapy for GPP, which was discontinued at the start of the randomized study treatment.
Subjects who experienced a GPP flare were eligible to receive up to two open-label intravenous doses of 900 mg SPEVIGO [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION]. Two (7%) subjects in the subcutaneous SPEVIGO 600 mg LD/300 mg every 4 weeks arm and 15 (48%) subjects in the placebo arm received intravenous SPEVIGO for treatment of GPP flare.
The primary endpoint of the study was the time to the first GPP flare up to Week 48 (defined by a GPPPGA pustulation sub score of ≥ 2 and an increase in GPPPGA total score by ≥ 2 from baseline). The key secondary endpoint was the occurrence of at least one GPP flare up to Week 48.
Clinical Response
The number of subjects who experienced at least one GPP flare and the time to first GPP flare are presented in Table 4 and Figure 1.
Table 4 : Occurrence of at Least One GPP Flare up to Week 48 in Adults and Pediatric Subjects (12 Years of Age and Older and Weighing At Least 40 kg) With a History of GPP in Study Effisayil-2 (Subcutaneous SPEVIGO)
|
Subcutaneous SPEVIGO 600 mg LD, followed by 300 mg every 4 weeks
(N=30) |
Placebo
(N=31) |
| Subjects with GPP flares, n (%)* |
3 (10) |
16 (52) |
| Risk difference for GPP flare occurrence vs placebo,% (95% CI) |
-39 (-62, -16) |
| *The use of intravenous SPEVIGO treatment or investigator-prescribed standard of care to treat GPP worsening were considered as onset of GPP flare |
Figure 1 : Time to First GPP Flare up to Week 48 in Adults and Pediatric Subjects (12 Years of Age and Older and Weighing At Least 40 kg) With a History of GPP in Study Effisayil-2 (Subcutaneous SPEVIGO)
The results of the primary and key secondary endpoints were generally consistent across subgroups including biological sex, age, race, BMI, body weight, mutation status in IL36RN, concurrent plaque psoriasis, GPPPGA total score at baseline, and irrespective of any systemic GPP treatment at randomization.