Clinical Pharmacology for Omlyclo
Mechanism Of Action
Asthma, Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps, And IgE-Mediated
Food Allergy
Omalizumab products inhibit the binding of IgE to the
high-affinity IgE receptor (FcοRI) on the surface of mast cells,
basophils, and dendritic cells, resulting in FcοRI down-regulation on
these cells.
In allergic asthmatics, treatment with omalizumab
products inhibit IgE-mediated inflammation, as evidenced by reduced blood and
tissue eosinophils and reduced inflammatory mediators, including IL-4, IL-5,
and IL-13.
Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
Omalizumab products bind to IgE and lowers free IgE
levels. Subsequently, IgE receptors (FcοRI) on cells down-regulate. The
mechanism by which these effects of omalizumab products result in an
improvement of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) symptoms is unknown.
Pharmacodynamics
Asthma
In clinical studies, serum free IgE levels were reduced
in a dose-dependent manner within 1 hour following the first dose and
maintained between doses. Mean serum free IgE decrease was greater than 96%
using recommended doses. Serum total IgE levels (i.e., bound and unbound)
increased after the first dose due to the formation of drug:IgE complexes,
which have a slower elimination rate compared with free IgE. At 16 weeks after
the first dose, average serum total IgE levels were five-fold higher compared
with pre-treatment when using standard assays. After discontinuation of
omalizumab dosing, the omalizumab -induced increase in total IgE and decrease
in free IgE were reversible, with no observed rebound in IgE levels after drug
washout. Total IgE levels did not return to pre-treatment levels for up to one
year after discontinuation of omalizumab.
Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps
In clinical studies in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal
polyps (CRSwNP) patients, omalizumab treatment led to a reduction in serum free
IgE and an increase in serum total IgE levels, similar to the observations in
asthma patients. The mean total IgE concentrations at baseline were 168 IU/mL
and 218 IU/mL in CRSwNP Trial 1 and 2, respectively. After repeated dosing
every 2 or 4 weeks, with dosage and frequency according to Table 3, the mean
predose free IgE concentrations at Week 16 were 10.0 IU/mL in CRSwNP Trial 1
and 11.7 IU/mL in CRSwNP Trial 2 and remained stable at 24 weeks of treatment.
Total IgE levels in serum increased due to the formation of omalizumab-IgE
complexes, which have a slower elimination rate compared with free IgE. After
repeated dosing every 2 or 4 weeks, with dosage and frequency according to
Table 3, mean and median predose serum total IgE levels at Week 16 were 3-to
4-fold higher compared with pre-treatment levels, and remained stable between
16 and 24 weeks of treatment.
IgE-Mediated Food Allergy
In a clinical study in patients with IgE-mediated food
allergy, omalizumab treatment led to a reduction in serum free IgE and an
increase in serum total IgE levels, similar to the observations in asthma
patients. The mean total IgE concentration at baseline was 810 IU/mL. After
repeated dosing every 2 or 4 weeks, with dosage and frequency according to
Table 4, the mean pre-dose free IgE concentration at Week 16 was 10.0 IU/mL.
Mean total IgE levels in serum increased about 2.4-fold due to the formation of
omalizumab-IgE complexes, which have a longer half-life compared with free IgE.
Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
In clinical studies in chronic spontaneous urticaria
(CSU) patients, omalizumab treatment led to a dose-dependent reduction of serum
free IgE and an increase of serum total IgE levels, similar to the observations
in asthma patients. Maximum suppression of free IgE was observed 3 days
following the first subcutaneous dose. After repeat dosing once every 4 weeks,
predose serum free IgE levels remained stable between 12 and 24 weeks of
treatment. Total IgE levels in serum increased after the first dose due to the
formation of omalizumab-IgE complexes which have a slower elimination rate compared
with free IgE. After repeat dosing once every 4 weeks at 75 mg up to 300 mg,
average predose serum total IgE levels at Week 12 were two-to three-fold higher
compared with pre-treatment levels, and remained stable between 12 and 24 weeks
of treatment. After discontinuation of omalizumab dosing, free IgE levels
increased and total IgE levels decreased towards pre-treatment levels over a
16-week follow-up period.
Pharmacokinetics
After SC administration, omalizumab was absorbed with an
average absolute bioavailability of 62%. Following a single SC dose in adult
and adolescent patients with asthma, omalizumab was absorbed slowly, reaching
peak serum concentrations after an average of 7– 8 days. In patients with CSU,
the peak serum concentration was reached at a similar time after a single SC
dose. The pharmacokinetics of omalizumab was linear at doses greater than 0.5
mg/kg. In patients with asthma, following multiple doses of omalizumab, areas
under the serum concentration-time curve from Day 0 to Day 14 at steady state
were up to 6-fold of those after the first dose. In patients with CSU,
omalizumab exhibited linear pharmacokinetics across the dose range of 75 mg to
600 mg given as single subcutaneous dose. Following repeat dosing from 75 to
300 mg every 4 weeks, trough serum concentrations of omalizumab increased
proportionally with the dose levels.
In vitro, omalizumab formed complexes of limited size
with IgE. Precipitating complexes and complexes larger than 1 million daltons
in molecular weight were not observed in vitro or in vivo. Tissue distribution
studies in Cynomolgus monkeys showed no specific uptake of 125IÂomalizumab by
any organ or tissue. The apparent volume of distribution of omalizumab in
patients with asthma following SC administration was 78 ± 32 mL/kg. In patients
with CSU, based on population pharmacokinetics, distribution of omalizumab was
similar to that in patients with asthma.
Clearance of omalizumab involved IgG clearance processes
as well as clearance via specific binding and complex formation with its target
ligand, IgE. Liver elimination of IgG included degradation in the liver
reticuloendothelial system (RES) and endothelial cells. Intact IgG was also
excreted in bile. In studies with mice and monkeys, drug:IgE complexes were eliminated
by interactions with Fcγ receptors within the RES at rates that were
generally faster than IgG clearance. In asthma patients omalizumab serum
elimination half-life averaged 26 days, with apparent clearance averaging 2.4 ±
1.1 mL/kg/day.
Doubling body weight approximately doubled apparent
clearance. In CSU patients, at steady state, based on population
pharmacokinetics, omalizumab serum elimination half-life averaged 24 days and
apparent clearance averaged 240 mL/day (corresponding to 3.0 mL/kg/day for an
80 kg patient).
Specific Populations
Asthma
The population pharmacokinetics of omalizumab was
analyzed to evaluate the effects of demographic characteristics in patients
with asthma. Analyses of these data suggested that no dose adjustments are
necessary for age (6 to 76 years), race, ethnicity, or gender.
Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps
The population pharmacokinetics analyses of omalizumab
suggested that the pharmacokinetics of omalizumab in chronic rhinosinusitis
with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) were consistent with that in asthma. Graphical
covariate analyses were performed to evaluate the effects of demographic
characteristics and other factors on omalizumab exposure and clinical
responses. These analyses demonstrate that no dose adjustments are necessary
for age (18 to 75 years) or gender. Race and ethnicity data are too limited in
CRSwNP studies to inform dose adjustment.
IgE-Mediated Food Allergy
Population pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses of omalizumab
suggested that the PK of omalizumab in patients with IgE-mediated food allergy
were generally consistent with that in patients with asthma. Covariate analyses
were performed to evaluate the effects of demographic characteristics and other
factors on omalizumab exposure and clinical responses. These analyses
demonstrate that no dose adjustments are necessary for age (1 year and older),
race, ethnicity, or gender.
Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
The population pharmacokinetics of omalizumab was
analyzed to evaluate the effects of demographic characteristics and other
factors on omalizumab exposure in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria
(CSU). Covariate effects were evaluated by analyzing the relationship between
omalizumab concentrations and clinical responses. These analyses demonstrate
that no dose adjustments are necessary for age (12 to 75 years),
race/ethnicity, gender, body weight, body mass index, or baseline IgE level.
Immunogenicity
The observed incidence of anti-drug antibodies is highly
dependent on the sensitivity and specificity of the assay. Differences in assay
methods preclude meaningful comparisons of the incidence of anti-drug
antibodies in the studies described below with the incidence of anti-drug
antibodies in other studies, including those of omalizumab or of other
omalizumab products.
Antibodies to omalizumab were detected in approximately
1/1723 (<0.1%) of patients treated with omalizumab in the clinical studies
evaluated for asthma in patients 12 years of age and older. In three pediatric
studies, antibodies to omalizumab were detected in one patient out of 581
patients 6 to <12 years of age treated with omalizumab and evaluated for
antibodies. There were no detectable antibodies in the patients treated in the
CSU clinical trials, but due to levels of omalizumab at the time of
anti-therapeutic antibody sampling and missing samples for some patients,
antibodies to omalizumab could only have been determined in 88% of the 733
patients treated in these clinical studies. The data reflect the percentage of
patients whose test results were considered positive for antibodies to
omalizumab in ELISA assays and are highly dependent on the sensitivity and
specificity of the assays.
Anti-drug antibodies were not measured in the CRSwNP or
IgE-mediated food allergy trials.
Clinical Studies
Asthma
Adult And Adolescent Patients 12 Years Of Age And Older
The safety and efficacy of omalizumab were evaluated in
three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trials.
The trials enrolled patients 12 to 76 years old, with
moderate to severe persistent (NHLBI criteria) asthma for at least one year,
and a positive skin test reaction to a perennial aeroallergen. In all trials,
omalizumab dosing was based on body weight and baseline serum total IgE
concentration. All patients were required to have a baseline IgE between 30 and
700 IU/mL and body weight not more than 150 kg. Patients were treated according
to a dosing table to administer at least 0.016 mg/kg/IU (IgE/mL) of omalizumab
or a matching volume of placebo over each 4-week period. The maximum omalizumab
dose per 4 weeks was 750 mg.
In all three trials an exacerbation was defined as a
worsening of asthma that required treatment with systemic corticosteroids or a
doubling of the baseline ICS dose. Most exacerbations were managed in the
outpatient setting and the majority were treated with systemic steroids.
Hospitalization rates were not significantly different between omalizumab and
placebo-treated patients; however, the overall hospitalization rate was small.
Among those patients who experienced an exacerbation, the distribution of exacerbation
severity was similar between treatment groups.
Asthma Trials 1 And 2
At screening, patients in Asthma Trials 1 and 2 had a
forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) between 40% and 80% predicted.
All patients had a FEV1 improvement of at least 12% following beta2-agonist
administration. All patients were symptomatic and were being treated with
inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and short-acting beta2-agonists. Patients
receiving other concomitant controller medications were excluded, and initiation
of additional controller medications while on study was prohibited. Patients
currently smoking were excluded.
Each trial was comprised of a run-in period to achieve a
stable conversion to a common ICS (beclomethasone dipropionate), followed by
randomization to omalizumab or placebo. Patients received omalizumab for 16
weeks with an unchanged corticosteroid dose unless an acute exacerbation
necessitated an increase. Patients then entered an ICS reduction phase of 12
weeks during which ICS dose reduction was attempted in a step-wise manner.
The distribution of the number of asthma exacerbations
per patient in each group during a study was analyzed separately for the stable
steroid and steroid-reduction periods.
In both Asthma Trials 1 and 2 the number of exacerbations
per patient was reduced in patients treated with omalizumab compared with
placebo (Table 10).
Measures of airflow (FEV1) and asthma symptoms were also
evaluated in these trials. The clinical relevance of the treatment-associated
differences is unknown. Results from the stable steroid phase Asthma Trial 1
are shown in Table 11. Results from the stable steroid phase of Asthma Trial 2
and the steroid reduction phases of both Asthma Trials 1 and 2 were similar to
those presented in Table 11.
Table 10: Frequency of Asthma Exacerbations per
Patient by Phase in Asthma Trials 1 and 2
| Exacerbations per patient |
Stable Steroid Phase (16 wks) |
| Asthma Trial 1 |
Asthma Trial 2 |
omalizumab
N=268 |
Placebo
N=257 |
omalizumab
N=274 |
Placebo
N=272 |
| 0 |
85.8% |
76.7% |
87.6% |
69.9% |
| 1 |
11.9% |
16.7% |
11.3% |
25.0% |
| ≥2 |
2.2% |
6.6% |
1.1% |
5.1% |
| p-Value |
0.005 |
<0.001 |
| Mean number exacerbations/patient |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
| 0 |
78.7% |
67.7% |
83.9% |
70.2% |
| 1 |
19.0% |
28.4% |
14.2% |
26.1% |
| ≥2 |
2.2% |
3.9% |
1.8% |
3.7% |
| p-Value |
0.004 |
<0.001 |
| Mean number exacerbations/patient |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
Table 11: Asthma Symptoms and Pulmonary Function
During Stable Steroid Phase of Asthma Trial 1
| Endpoint |
omalizumab
N=268* |
Placebo
N=257* |
| Mean Baseline |
Median Change (Baseline to Wk 16) |
Mean Baseline |
Median Change (Baseline to Wk 16) |
| Total asthma symptom score |
4.3 |
-1.5† |
4.2 |
-1.1† |
| Nocturnal asthma score |
1.2 |
-0.4† |
1.1 |
-0.2† |
| Daytime asthma score |
2.3 |
-0.9† |
2.3 |
-0.6† |
| FEV1 % predicted |
68 |
3† |
68 |
0† |
Asthma symptom scale: total score from 0 (least) to 9
(most); nocturnal and daytime scores from 0 (least) to 4 (most symptoms).
* Number of patients available for analysis ranges 255-258 in the omalizumab
group and 238-239 in the placebo group.
† Comparisonofomalizumabversusplacebo(p<0.05). |
Asthma Trial 3
In Asthma Trial 3, there was no restriction on screening
FEV1, and unlike Asthma Trials 1 and 2, long-acting beta2-agonists were
allowed. Patients were receiving at least 1000 μg/day fluticasone
propionate and a subset was also receiving oral corticosteroids. Patients
receiving other concomitant controller medications were excluded, and
initiation of additional controller medications while on study was prohibited.
Patients currently smoking were excluded.
The trial was comprised of a run-in period to achieve a
stable conversion to a common ICS (fluticasone propionate), followed by
randomization to omalizumab or placebo. Patients were stratified by use of
ICS-only or ICS with concomitant use of oral steroids. Patients received
omalizumab for 16 weeks with an unchanged corticosteroid dose unless an acute
exacerbation necessitated an increase. Patients then entered an ICS reduction
phase of 16 weeks during which ICS or oral steroid dose reduction was attempted
in a step-wise manner.
The number of exacerbations in patients treated with
omalizumab was similar to that in placebo-treated patients (Table 12). The
absence of an observed treatment effect may be related to differences in the
patient population compared with Asthma Trials 1 and 2, study sample size, or
other factors.
Table 12: Percentage of Patients with Asthma
Exacerbations by Subgroup and Asthma Phase in Trial 3
| |
Stable Steroid Phase (16 wks) |
| Inhaled Only |
Oral + Inhaled |
omalizumab
N=126 |
Placebo
N=120 |
omalizumab
N=50 |
Placebo
N=45 |
| % Patients with ≥1 exacerbations |
15.9% |
15.0% |
32.0% |
22.2% |
| Difference (95% CI) |
0.9 (-9.7, 13.7) |
9.8 (-10.5, 31.4) |
| |
Steroid Reduction Phase (16 wks) |
omalizumab N=126 |
Placebo
N=120 |
omalizumab
N=50 |
Placebo
N=45 |
| % Patients with ≥1 exacerbations |
22.2% |
26.7% |
42.0% |
42.2% |
| Difference (95% CI) |
1 . I 7. 4 4) |
-0.2 (-22.4, 20.1) |
In all three of the trials, a reduction of asthma
exacerbations was not observed in the omalizumabÂtreated patients who had
FEV1>80% at the time of randomization. Reductions in exacerbations were not
seen in patients who required oral steroids as maintenance therapy.
Pediatric Patients 6 To <12 Years Of Age
The safety and efficacy of omalizumab in pediatric
patients 6 to <12 years of age with moderate to severe asthma is based on
one randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, multi-center trial (Asthma
Trial 4 [NCT00079937]) and an additional supportive study (Asthma Trial 5).
Asthma Trial 4 was a 52-week study that evaluated the
safety and efficacy of omalizumab as add-on therapy in 628 pediatric patients
ages 6 to <12 years with moderate to severe asthma inadequately controlled
despite the use of inhaled corticosteroids (fluticasone propionate DPI
≥200 mcg/day or equivalent) with or without other controller asthma
medications. Eligible patients were those with a diagnosis of asthma >1
year, a positive skin prick test to at least one perennial aeroallergen, and a
history of clinical features such as daytime and/or night-time symptoms and
exacerbations within the year prior to study entry. During the first 24 weeks
of treatment, steroid doses remained constant from baseline. This was followed
by a 28-week period during which inhaled corticosteroid adjustment was allowed.
The primary efficacy variable was the rate of asthma
exacerbations during the 24-week, fixed steroid treatment phase. An asthma
exacerbation was defined as a worsening of asthma symptoms as judged clinically
by the investigator, requiring doubling of the baseline inhaled corticosteroid
dose for at least 3 days and/or treatment with rescue systemic (oral or IV)
corticosteroids for at least 3 days. At 24 weeks, the omalizumab group had a
statistically significantly lower rate of asthma exacerbations (0.45 vs. 0.64)
with an estimated rate ratio of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.53, 0.90).
The omalizumab group also had a lower rate of asthma
exacerbations compared to placebo over the full 52-week double-blind treatment
period (0.78 vs. 1.36; rate ratio: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.45, 0.72). Other efficacy
variables such as nocturnal symptom scores, beta-agonist use, and measures of
airflow (FEV1) were not significantly different in omalizumab-treated patients
compared to placebo.
Asthma Trial 5 was a 28-week randomized, double blind,
placebo-controlled study that primarily evaluated safety in 334 pediatric
patients, 298 of whom were 6 to <12 years of age, with moderate to severe
asthma who were well-controlled with inhaled corticosteroids (beclomethasone
dipropionate 168-420 mcg/day). A 16-week steroid treatment period was followed
by a 12-week steroid dose reduction period. Patients treated with omalizumab
had fewer asthma exacerbations compared to placebo during both the 16-week
fixed steroid treatment period (0.18 vs. 0.32; rate ratio: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.35,
0.96) and the 28-week treatment period (0.38 vs. 0.76; rate ratio: 0.50; 95%
CI: 0.36, 0.71).
Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps
Adult Patients 18 Years Of Age And Older
The safety and efficacy of omalizumab was evaluated in
two, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials
(CRSwNP Trial 1 [NCT03280550] and CRSwNP Trial 2 [NCT03280537]) that enrolled
patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) with inadequate
response to nasal corticosteroids (CRSwNP Trial 1, n=138; CRSwNP Trial 2,
n=127). Patients received omalizumab or placebo SC every 2 or 4 weeks, with
omalizumab dosage and frequency according to Table 3, for 24 weeks followed by
a 4-week follow-up period. All patients received background nasal mometasone
therapy during both the treatment period and during a 5Âweek run-in period.
Prior to randomization, patients were required to have evidence of bilateral
polyps as determined by a nasal polyp score (NPS) ≥ 5 with NPS ≥ 2
in each nostril, despite use of nasal mometasone during the run-in period. NPS
was measured via endoscopy and scored (range 0-4 per nostril: 0= no polyps;
1=small polyps in the middle meatus not reaching below the inferior border of
the middle turbinate; 2=polyps reaching below the lower border of the middle
turbinate; 3=large polyps reaching the lower border of the inferior turbinate
or polyps medial to the middle turbinate; 4=large polyps causing complete
obstruction of the inferior nasal cavity) for a total NPS (range 0-8). Patients
were furthermore required to have a weekly average of nasal congestion score
(NCS) > 1 prior to randomization, despite use of nasal mometasone. Nasal
congestion was measured by a daily assessment on a 0 to 3 point severity scale
(0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). Prior sino-nasal surgery or prior
systemic corticosteroid usage were not required for inclusion in the trials and
sinus CT scans were not performed to evaluate for sinus opacification.
Demographics and baseline characteristics, including
allergic comorbidities, are described in Table 13.
Table 13: Demographics and Baseline Characteristics of
CRSwNP Trials 1 and 2
| Parameter |
CRSwNP Trial 1
(n=138) |
CRSwNP Trial 2
(n=127) |
| Mean age (years) (SD) |
51 (13) |
50 (12) |
| % Male |
64 |
65 |
| Patients with systemic corticosteroid use in the previous year (%) |
19 |
26 |
| Patients with prior surgery for nasal polyps (%) |
79 (57) |
79 (62) |
| Mean bilateral endoscopic NPS (SD), range 0-8 |
6.2 (1.0) |
6.3 (0.9) |
| Mean nasal congestion score (SD) range 0-3 |
2.4 (0.6) |
2.3 (0.7) |
| Mean sense of smell score (SD) range 0-3 |
2.7 (0.7) |
2.7 (0.7) |
| Mean post nasal drip score (SD) range 0-3 |
1.8 (0.9) |
1.7 (0.9) |
| Mean runny nose score (SD) range 0-3 |
2.0 (0.8) |
1.9 (0.9) |
| Mean blood eosinophils (cells/mcL) (SD) |
346 (284) |
335 (188) |
| Mean total IgE IU/mL (SD) |
161 (140) |
190 (201) |
| Asthma (%) |
54 |
61 |
| Aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease (%) |
20 |
35 |
| CRSwNP= chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps;
SD=standard deviation; NPS=nasal polyp score; IgE = Immunoglobulin E;
IU=international units. For NPS, NCS, sense of smell, post nasal drip, and
runny nose, higher scores indicate greater disease severity. |
The co-primary endpoints in CRSwNP Trials 1 and 2 were
NPS and average daily NCS at Week 24. In both trials, patients who received omalizumab
had a statistically significant greater improvement from baseline at Week 24 in
NPS and weekly average NCS, than patients who received placebo. Results from
CRSwNP Trials 1 and 2 are shown in Table 14.
The greater improvements in NPS and NCS in the omalizumab
group compared to the placebo group were observed as early as the first
assessment at Week 4 in both studies, as seen in Figure 1.
Table 14: Change from Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal
Polyp Score and 7-day Average of Daily Nasal Congestion Score in CRSwNP Trials
1 and 2
| |
Trial 1 |
Trial 2 |
| Placebo |
omalizumab |
Placebo |
omalizumab |
| Number of patients |
65 |
72 |
65 |
62 |
| Nasal Polyp Score |
| Mean Baseline Score |
6.3 |
6.2 |
6.1 |
6.4 |
| LS Mean Change From Baseline at Week 24 |
0.1 |
-1.1 |
-0.3 |
-0.9 |
| Difference in LS means vs. placebo |
-1.1 |
|
-0.6 |
|
| 95% CI for difference |
-1.6,-0.7 |
-1.1, -0.1 |
| p-value |
<0.0001 |
0.0140 |
| 7-day Average of Daily Nasal Congestion Score |
| Mean Baseline Score |
2.5 |
2.4 |
2.3 |
2.3 |
| LS Mean Change From Baseline at Week 24 |
-0.4 |
-0.9 |
-0.2 |
-0.7 |
| Difference in LS means vs. placebo |
-0.6 |
-0.5 |
| 95% CI for difference |
-0.8, -0.3 |
-0.8, -0.2 |
| p-value |
0.0004 |
0.0017 |
| CRSwNP= chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps;
LS=least-square. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effect model
of repeated measures (MMRM) model with baseline score, baseline score/timepoint
(week) interaction as covariates, and the following factors: geographic region,
asthma/aspirin sensitivity comorbidity status, timepoint, treatment group,
treatment/timepoint interaction. |
The mean NPS and NCS at each study week by treatment
group is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Mean Change from Baseline in Nasal
Congestion Score and Mean Change from Baseline in Nasal Polyp Score by
Treatment Group in CRSwNP Trials 1 and 2
Omalizumab had statistically significant improvements on
sense of smell score compared to placebo. Sense of smell was measured by a
daily assessment on a 0 to 3 point severity scale (0=no symptoms, 1=mild
symptoms, 2=moderate symptoms, 3=severe symptoms). The LS mean difference for
change from baseline at Week 24 in sense of smell score in omalizumab compared
to placebo was -0.3 (95% CI: -0.6, -0.1) in CRSwNP Trial 1 and -0.5 (95% CI:
-0.7, -0.2) in CRSwNP Trial 2.
Omalizumab had statistically significant improvements on
post-nasal drip compared to placebo. The LS mean difference for change from
baseline at Week 24 in post-nasal drip score in omalizumab compared to placebo
was -0.6 (95% CI: -0.8, -0.3) in CRSwNP Trial 1 and -0.5 (95% CI: -0.8, -0.3)
in CRSwNP Trial 2.
Omalizumab had statistically significant improvements on
runny nose compared to placebo. The LS mean difference for change from baseline
at Week 24 in runny nose score in omalizumab compared to placebo was -0.4 (95%
CI: -0.7, -0.2) in CRSwNP Trial 1 and -0.6 (95% CI: -0.9, Â0.4) in CRSwNP Trial
2.
In a pre-specified pooled analysis of systemic
corticosteroid use during the 24-week treatment period, there was no
significant reduction in systemic corticosteroid use between the treatment
arms. The proportion of patients taking systemic corticosteroid in omalizumab
was 2.3% compared to 6.2% in placebo. The odds-ratio of systemic corticosteroid
use with omalizumab compared to placebo was 0.4 (95% CI: 0.1, 1.5).
There were no sino-nasal surgeries reported, in either
placebo or omalizumab arms, in either Trial.
IgE-Mediated Food Allergy
The safety and efficacy of omalizumab was evaluated in a
multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Food Allergy (FA)
trial [NCT03881696] in 168 adult patients and pediatric patients 1 year of age
to less than 56 years who were allergic to peanut and at least two other foods,
including milk, egg, wheat, cashew, hazelnut, or walnut (i.e., studied foods).
The FA trial enrolled patients who experienced dose-limiting symptoms (e.g.,
moderate to severe skin, respiratory or gastrointestinal symptoms) to a single
dose of ≤100 mg of peanut protein and ≤300 mg protein for each of
the other two foods (milk, egg, wheat, cashew, hazelnut, or walnut) during the
screening double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC). Patients
with a history of severe anaphylaxis (defined as neurological compromise or
requiring intubation) were excluded from the study. Patients were randomized
2:1 to receive a subcutaneous dosage of omalizumab or placebo based on serum
total IgE level (IU/mL), measured before the start of treatment, and by body
weight according to Table 4 [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION] for 16 to 20
weeks. After 16 to 20 weeks of treatment, each patient completed a DBPCFC
consisting of placebo and each of their 3 studied foods. Following the DBPCFC,
the first 60 patients that included 59 pediatric patients and one adult patient
who completed the double-blind, placebo-controlled phase of the study could
continue to receive omalizumab in a 24 to 28 week open-label extension.
Efficacy of omalizumab is based on 165 pediatric patients
who were included in the efficacy analyses provided below. The mean age of the
pediatric patients was 8 years (age range: 1 to 17 years); 37% were less than 6
years of age, 38% were 6 to less than 12 years of age, and 25% were 12 to less
than 18 years of age. Patient population were 56% male, 63% White, 13% Asian,
7% Black, 16% Other, and 55% of patients had a history of asthma.
The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage of
patients who were able to consume a single dose of ≥600 mg of peanut
protein without dose-limiting symptoms (e.g., moderate to severe skin,
respiratory or gastrointestinal symptoms) during DBPCFC. Table 15 shows
omalizumab treatment led to a statistically higher response rate (68%) than placebo
(5%).
The secondary efficacy endpoints were the percentage of
patients who were able to consume a single dose of ≥1000 mg of cashew,
milk, or egg protein without dose-limiting symptoms during DBPCFC. The study
met the secondary endpoints and demonstrated that omalizumab treatment led to
statistically higher response rates than placebo for all three foods. See Table
15 for details.
Table 15: DBPCFC Response Rates in Pediatric Patients
for Single Dose of Peanut, Cashew, Milk or Egg Protein in FA Trial
| Food, Challenge Dose |
Response Ratea (%) (n/N) |
Treatment Difference (%) (Omalizumab-Placebo) (95% CI) |
| Omalizumab |
Placebo |
| Peanut, ≥600 mg |
68% (75/110) |
5% (3/55) |
63% (50%, 73%) |
| Peanut, ≥1000 mgb |
65% (72/110) |
0% (0/55) |
65% (56%, 74%) |
| Cashew, ≥1000 mg |
42% (27/64) |
3% (1/30) |
39% (20%, 53%) |
| Milk, ≥1000 mg |
66% (25/38) |
11% (2/19) |
55% (29%, 73%) |
| Egg, ≥1000 mg |
67% (31/46) |
0% (0/19) |
67% (49%, 80%) |
CI = Confidence interval; DBPCFC = Double-blind
placebo-controlled food challenge; n = Number of responders; N = Total number
of patients receiving food, challenge dose.
aResponse defined as consumption of a single dose of the specified
amount of food without dose-limiting symptoms.
bConsumption of a single dose of ≥1000 mg of peanut protein
was an additional secondary endpoint. The key secondary efficacy endpoints were
the percentage of patients who were able to consume a single dose of
≥1000 mg of cashew, milk, or egg protein.
Notes: Subjects without an exit DBPCFC or evaluable exit DBPCFC were counted as
non-responders; P-values from two-sided Fisher’s exact tests were <0.0001
for all the food challenge doses. |
Seventeen percent of omalizumab treated patients were not
able to consume >100 mg of peanut protein without moderate to severe
dose-limiting symptoms. Eighteen, 22, and 41 percent of omalizumab-treated
patients were not able to consume >300 mg of milk, egg, or cashew protein,
respectively, without moderate to severe dose-limiting symptoms.
Additional secondary analyses included the percentage of
patients who were able to consume at least two or all three foods during
DBPCFC. For two foods, 71% of omalizumab treated patients were able to consume
a single dose of ≥600 mg versus 5% in the placebo group and 67% were able
to consume a single dose of ≥1000 mg versus 4% in the placebo group. For
a single dose of ≥600 mg of three foods, the response rates were 48% in
the omalizumab group versus 4% in the placebo group and for a single dose of
≥1000 mg of three foods, the response rate in the omalizumab group was
39% while none of the placebo patients were able to consume the challenge dose
without symptoms.
The effectiveness of omalizumab in adults is supported by
the adequate and well-controlled trial of omalizumab in pediatric patients,
disease similarity in pediatric and adult patients, and pharmacokinetic (PK)
similarity [see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY].
While efficacy cannot be established from uncontrolled,
open-label studies, for 38 pediatric patients who continued omalizumab for
24-28 weeks in an open-label extension, the percentage of patients who were
able to consume ≥600 mg of peanut protein and ≥1000 mg of egg,
milk, and/or cashew protein without moderate to severe dose-limiting symptoms
was maintained.
Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
Adult And Adolescent Patients 12 Years Of Age And Older
The safety and efficacy of omalizumab for the treatment
of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), previously referred to as chronic
idiopathic urticaria (CIU) was assessed in two placebo-controlled,
multiple-dose clinical trials of 24 weeks' duration (CSU Trial 1; n= 319,
[NCT01287117]) and 12 weeks' duration (CSU Trial 2; n=322, [NCT01292473]).
Patients received omalizumab 75 mg, 150 mg, or 300 mg or placebo by SC
injection every 4 weeks in addition to their baseline level of H1 antihistamine
therapy for 24 or 12 weeks, followed by a 16Âweek washout observation period. A
total of 640 patients (165 males, 475 females) were included for the efficacy
analyses. Most patients were white (84%) and the median age was 42 years (range
12–72).
Disease severity was measured by a weekly urticaria
activity score (UAS7, range 0–42), which is a composite of the weekly itch
severity score (range 0–21) and the weekly hive count score (range 0–21). All
patients were required to have a UAS7 of ≥16, and a weekly itch severity
score of ≥8 for the 7 days prior to randomization, despite having used an
H1 antihistamine for at least 2 weeks.
The mean weekly itch severity scores at baseline were
fairly balanced across treatment groups and ranged between 13.7 and 14.5
despite use of an H1 antihistamine at an approved dose. The reported median
durations of CSU at enrollment across treatment groups were between 2.5 and 3.9
years (with an overall subject-level range of 0.5 to 66.4 years).
In both CSU Trials 1 and 2, patients who received
omalizumab 150 mg or 300 mg had greater decreases from baseline in weekly itch
severity scores and weekly hive count scores than placebo at Week 12.
Representative results from CSU Trial 1 are shown (Table 16); similar results
were observed in CSU Trial 2. The 75-mg dose did not demonstrate consistent
evidence of efficacy and is not approved for use.
Table 16: Change from Baseline to Week 12 in Weekly
Itch Severity Score and Weekly Hive Count Score in CSU Trial 1*
| |
Omalizumab 75 mg |
Omalizumab 150 mg |
Omalizumab 300 mg |
Placebo |
| n |
77 |
80 |
81 |
80 |
| Weekly Itch Severity Score |
| Mean Baseline Score (SD) |
14.5 (3.6) |
14.1 (3.8) |
14.2 (3.3) |
14.4 (3.5) |
| Mean Change Week 12 (SD) |
-6.46 (6.14) |
-6.66 (6.28) |
-9.40 (5.73) |
-3.63 (5.22) |
| Difference in LS means vs. placebo |
-2.96 |
-2.95 |
-5.80 |
- |
| 95% CI for difference |
-4.71, -1.21 |
-4.72, -1.18 |
-7.49, -4.10 |
- |
| Weekly Hive Count Score† |
| Mean Baseline Score (SD) |
17.2 (4.2) |
16.2 (4.6) |
17.1 (3.8) |
16.7 (4.4) |
| Mean Change Week 12 (SD) |
-7.36 (7.52) |
-7.78 (7.08) |
-11.35 (7.25) |
-4.37 (6.60) |
| Difference in LS means vs. placebo |
-2.75 |
3.44 |
-6.93 |
- |
| placebo 95% CI for difference |
-4.95, -0.54 |
- -5.57, -1.32 |
-9.10, -4.76 |
- |
* Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population: all
patients who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication.
† Score measured on a range of 0–21 |
The mean weekly itch severity score at each study week by
treatment groups is shown in Figure 2. Representative results from CSU Trial 1
are shown; similar results were observed in CSU Trial 2. The appropriate
duration of therapy for CSU with omalizumab has not been determined.
Figure 2: Mean Weekly Itch Severity Score by Treatment
Group Modified Intent to Treat Patients in CSU Trial 1
In CSU Trial 1, a larger proportion of patients treated
with omalizumab 300 mg (36%) reported no itch and no hives (UAS7=0) at Week 12
compared to patients treated with omalizumab 150 mg (15%), omalizumab 75 mg
(12%), and placebo group (9%). Similar results were observed in CSU Trial 2.