Clinical Pharmacology for Olumiant
Mechanism Of Action
Baricitinib is a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor. JAKs are intracellular enzymes which transmit signals arising from cytokine or growth factor-receptor interactions on the cellular membrane to influence cellular processes of hematopoiesis and immune cell function. Within the signaling pathway, JAKs phosphorylate and activate Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription (STATs) which modulate intracellular activity including gene expression. Baricitinib modulates the signaling pathway at the point of JAKs, preventing the phosphorylation and activation of STATs.
JAK enzymes transmit cytokine signaling through their pairing (e.g., JAK1/JAK2, JAK1/JAK3, JAK1/TYK2, JAK2/JAK2, JAK2/TYK2). In cell-free isolated enzyme assays, baricitinib had greater inhibitory potency at JAK1, JAK2 and TYK2 relative to JAK3. In human leukocytes, baricitinib inhibited cytokine induced STAT phosphorylation mediated by JAK1/JAK2, JAK1/JAK3, JAK1/TYK2, or JAK2/TYK2 with comparable potencies. However, the relevance of inhibition of specific JAK enzymes to therapeutic effectiveness is not currently known.
Pharmacodynamics
Baricitinib Inhibition Of IL-6 Induced STAT3 Phosphorylation
Baricitinib administration resulted in a dose dependent inhibition of IL-6 induced STAT3 phosphorylation in whole blood from healthy subjects with maximal inhibition observed approximately 1 hour after dosing, which returned to near baseline by 24 hours. Similar levels of inhibition were observed using either IL-6 or TPO as the stimulus.
Immunoglobulins
Mean serum IgG, IgM, and IgA values decreased by 12 weeks after starting treatment with OLUMIANT, and remained stable through at least 52 weeks. For most patients, changes in immunoglobulins occurred within the normal reference range.
C-Reactive Protein
In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, decreases in serum C-reactive protein (CRP) were observed as early as one week after starting treatment with OLUMIANT and were maintained throughout dosing.
Cardiac Electrophysiology
At a dose 10 times the maximum recommended dose, baricitinib does not prolong the QT interval to any clinically relevant extent.
Pharmacokinetics
Following oral administration of OLUMIANT, peak plasma concentrations are reached approximately at 1 hour. A doseproportional increase in systemic exposure was observed in the therapeutic dose range. The pharmacokinetics of baricitinib do not change over time. Steady-state concentrations are achieved in 2 to 3 days with minimal accumulation after once-daily administration.
Absorption
The absolute bioavailability of baricitinib is approximately 80%. An assessment of food effects in healthy subjects showed that a high-fat meal decreased the mean AUC and Cmax of baricitinib by approximately 11% and 18%, respectively, and delayed the tmax by 0.5 hours. Administration with meals is not associated with a clinically relevant effect on exposure. In clinical studies, OLUMIANT was administered without regard to meals.
Distribution
After intravenous administration, the volume of distribution is 76 L, indicating distribution of baricitinib into tissues. Baricitinib is approximately 50% bound to plasma proteins and 45% bound to serum proteins. Baricitinib is a substrate of the Pgp, BCRP, OAT3 and MATE2-K transporters, which play roles in drug distribution.
Elimination
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Alopecia Areata
The total body clearance of baricitinib is 8.9 L/h in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and 11 L/h in patients with alopecia areata. Elimination half-life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and alopecia areata is approximately 12 to 16 hours.
COVID-19
The total body clearance and half-life of baricitinib is 14.2 L/h and 10.8 hours, respectively, in patients with COVID-19 who are intubated and have baricitinib administered via NG or OG tube.
Metabolism
Approximately 6% of the orally administered baricitinib dose is identified as metabolites (three from urine and one from feces), with CYP3A4 identified as the main metabolizing enzyme. No metabolites of baricitinib were quantifiable in plasma.
Excretion
Renal elimination is the principal clearance mechanism for baricitinib through filtration and active secretion as baricitinib is identified as a substrate of OAT3, Pgp, BCRP and MATE2-K from in vitro studies. In a clinical pharmacology study, approximately 75% of the administered dose was eliminated in the urine, while about 20% of the dose was eliminated in the feces. Baricitinib was excreted predominately as unchanged drug in urine (69%) and feces (15%).
Specific Populations
Effects Of Body Weight, Gender, Race, And Age
Body weight, gender, race, ethnicity, and age did not have a clinically relevant effect on the PK (AUC and Cmax) of baricitinib (Figure 1). The mean effects of intrinsic factors on PK parameters (AUC and Cmax) were generally within the inter-subject PK variability of baricitinib. The inter-subject variabilities (% coefficients of variation) in AUC and Cmax of baricitinib are approximately 41% and 22%, respectively, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis [see Use In Specific Populations].
Patients With Renal Impairment
Baricitinib systemic exposure in AUC was increased by 1.41-, 2.22-, 4.05- and 2.41-fold for mild, moderate, severe, and ESRD (with hemodialysis) renal impairment sub-groups, respectively, compared to subjects with normal renal function. The corresponding values for increase in Cmax were 1.16-, 1.46-, 1.40- and 0.88-fold, respectively (Figure 1) [see Use In Specific Populations].
Patients With Hepatic Impairment
Baricitinib systemic exposure and Cmax increased by 1.19- and 1.08-fold for the moderate hepatic impairment group, respectively, compared to subjects with normal hepatic function (Figure 1) [see Use In Specific Populations].
Figure 1: Impact of Intrinsic Factors on Baricitinib Pharmacokineticsa, b
 |
a Reference values for weight, age, gender, and race comparisons are 70 kg, 54 years, male, and white, respectively; reference groups for renal and hepatic impairment are subjects with normal renal and hepatic function, respectively.
b Effects of renal and hepatic impairment on baricitinib exposure were summarized from dedicated renal and hepatic impairment studies, respectively. Effects of other intrinsic factors on baricitinib exposure were summarized from population PK analysis.
c The recommended dose for patients with COVID-19 and severe renal impairment (eGFR 15 - <30 mL/min/1.73m2) is 1 mg once daily. OLUMIANT is not recommended for use in patients with COVID-19 who are on dialysis, have end-stage renal disease (ESRD), or acute kidney injury (eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73m2). [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION] |
Drug Interactions
Potential For Baricitinib To Influence The PK Of Other Drugs
In vitro, baricitinib did not significantly inhibit or induce the activity of cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYPs 3A, 1A2, 2B6, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, and 2D6). In clinical pharmacology studies, there were no clinically meaningful changes in the pharmacokinetics (PK) of simvastatin, ethinyl estradiol, or levonorgestrel (CYP3A substrates) when co-administered with baricitinib.
In vitro studies suggest that baricitinib is not an inhibitor of the transporters, P-glycoprotein (Pgp) or Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptide (OATP) 1B1. In vitro data indicate baricitinib does inhibit organic anionic transporter (OAT) 1, OAT2, OAT3, organic cationic transporter (OCT) 1, OCT2, OATP1B3, Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP) and Multidrug and Toxic Extrusion Protein (MATE) 1 and MATE2-K, but clinically meaningful changes in the pharmacokinetics of drugs that are substrates for these transporters are unlikely. In clinical pharmacology studies there were no clinically meaningful effects on the PK of digoxin (Pgp substrate) or methotrexate (substrate of several transporters) when coadministered with baricitinib.
Exposure changes of drugs following co-administration with baricitinib are shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2: Impact of Baricitinib on the Pharmacokinetics of Other Drugsa
 |
| a Reference group is administration of concomitant drug alone. |
Potential For Other Drugs To Influence The PK Of Baricitinib
In vitro studies suggest that baricitinib is a CYP3A4 substrate. In clinical pharmacology studies there was no effect on the PK of baricitinib when co-administered with ketoconazole (CYP3A inhibitor). There were no clinically meaningful changes in the PK of baricitinib when co-administered with fluconazole (CYP3A/CYP2C19/CYP2C9 inhibitor) or rifampicin (CYP3A inducer).
In vitro studies suggest that baricitinib is a substrate for OAT3, Pgp, BCRP and MATE2-K. In a clinical study, probenecid administration (strong OAT3 inhibitor) resulted in an approximately 2-fold increase in baricitinib AUC0-∞ with no effect on Cmax and tmax [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION and DRUG INTERACTIONS]. However, simulations with diclofenac and ibuprofen (OAT3 inhibitors with less inhibition potential) predicted minimal effect on the PK of baricitinib. In clinical pharmacology studies there was no clinically meaningful effect on the PK of baricitinib when co-administered with cyclosporine (Pgp and BCRP inhibitor). Co-administration with methotrexate (substrate of several transporters) did not have a clinically meaningful effect on the PK of baricitinib.
Exposure changes of baricitinib following co-administration with CYP inhibitors or inducers, transporter inhibitors, as well as methotrexate and the proton pump inhibitor, omeprazole, are shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3: Impact of Other Drugs on the Pharmacokinetics of Baricitinibb
 |
a Values are based on simulated studies.
b Reference group is administration of baricitinib alone. |
Clinical Studies
Rheumatoid Arthritis
The OLUMIANT clinical development program included two dose-ranging trials and four confirmatory phase 3 trials in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although other doses have been studied, the recommended dosage of OLUMIANT is 2 mg once daily.
Dose-Ranging Studies
The dose-ranging studies RA-1 (NCT01185353) and RA-2 (NCT01469013) included a 12-week randomized comparison of baricitinib 1, 2, 4, and 8 mg orally once daily versus placebo in 301 and 145 patients, respectively.
The results from the dose-ranging studies are shown in Table 11. In dose-ranging Study RA-1, the observed ACR response was similar for baricitinib 1 and 2 mg daily and for baricitinib 4 and 8 mg daily, with the highest response for baricitinib 8 mg daily. In dose-ranging Study RA-2, there was not a clear trend of dose response, with similar response rates for 1 mg and 4 mg and 2 mg and 8 mg.
Table 11: Proportion of Patients with ACR20 Response at Week 12 in Dose-Ranging RA Studies
|
% ACR20 Responders |
| Dose-Ranging Study |
Placebo |
Baricitinib
1 mg daily |
Baricitinib
2 mg daily |
Baricitinib
4 mg daily |
Baricitinib
8 mg daily |
| RA-1 (N=301) |
41 |
57 |
54 |
75 |
78 |
| RA-2 (N=145) |
31 |
67 |
83 |
67 |
88 |
Confirmatory Studies
The efficacy and safety of OLUMIANT 2 mg once daily was assessed in two confirmatory phase 3 trials. These trials were randomized, double-blind, multicenter studies in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis diagnosed according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism 2010 criteria. Patients over 18 years of age were eligible if at least 6 tender and 6 swollen joints were present at baseline. The two studies (Studies RA-3 and RA-4) evaluated OLUMIANT 2 mg and baricitinib 4 mg.
Study RA-3 (NCT01721057) was a 24-week trial in 684 patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis who had an inadequate response or intolerance to conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs). Patients received OLUMIANT 2 mg or 4 mg once daily or placebo added to existing background cDMARD treatment. From Week 16, non-responding patients could be rescued to receive baricitinib 4 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved an ACR20 response at Week 12.
StudyRA-4 (NCT01721044) was a 24-week trial in 527 patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis who had an inadequate response or intolerance to 1 or more TNF inhibitor therapies with or without other biologic DMARDs (TNFi-IR). Patients received OLUMIANT 2 mg or baricitinib 4 mg once daily or placebo added to background cDMARD treatment. From Week 16, non-responding patients could be rescued to receive baricitinib 4 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved an ACR20 response at Week 12.
Clinical Response
The percentages of OLUMIANT-treated patients achieving ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 responses, and Disease Activity Score (DAS28-CRP) <2.6 in Studies RA-3 andRA-4 are shown in Table 8.
Patients treated with OLUMIANT had higher rates of ACR response and DAS28-CRP <2.6 versus placebo-treated patients at Week 12 (Studies RA-3 andRA-4) (Table 12).
In StudyRA-4, higher ACR20 response rates (Figure 4) were observed as early as 1 week with OLUMIANT 2 mg versus placebo.
In StudyRA-4, the proportions of patients achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 who had at least 3 active joints at the end of Week 24 were 18.2% and 10.5%, in the placebo and OLUMIANT 2 mg arms, respectively.
Table 12: Clinical Response in RA Studies RA-3 and RA-4a
|
Percent of Patients |
| cDMARD-IR |
TNFi-IR |
| Study RA-3 |
Study RA-3 |
| Placebo + cDMARDs |
OLUMIANT 2 mg/day + cDMARDs
Δ (95% CI)b |
Placebo + cDMARDs |
OLUMIANT 2 mg/day + cDMARDs
Δ (95% CI)b |
| N |
228 |
229 |
176 |
174 |
| ACR 20 |
| Week 12 % |
39 |
66
27 (18, 35) |
27 |
49
22 (12, 32) |
| Week 24 % |
42 |
61
19 (10, 28) |
27 |
45
18 (8, 27) |
| ACR 50 |
| Week 12 % |
13 |
34
21 (13, 28) |
8 |
20
12 (5, 19) |
| Week 24 % |
21 |
41
20 (12, 28) |
13 |
23
10 (2, 18) |
| ACR 70 |
| Week 12 % |
3 |
18
15 (9, 20) |
2 |
13
11 (5, 16) |
| Week 24 % |
8 |
25
17 (11, 24) |
3 |
13
10 (4, 16) |
| DAS28-CRP<2.6 |
| Week 12 % |
9 |
26
(10, 24) |
4 |
11
(2, 12) |
| Week 24 % |
11 |
31
(13, 27) |
6 |
11
(-1, 11) |
a Patients who were rescued or discontinued treatment were considered as non-responders in the analyses.
b 95% confidence interval for the difference (Δ) in response rate between OLUMIANT treatment and placebo (Study RA-3, Study RA-4). |
The effects of OLUMIANT treatment on the components of the ACR response criteria for Studies RA-3and RA-4 are shown in Table 13.
Table 13: Components of ACR Response at Week 12 in RA Studies RA-3 and RA-4a
|
cDMARD-IR |
TNFi-IR |
| Study RA-3 |
Study RA-4 |
| Placebo + cDMARDs |
OLUMIANT 2 mg/day + cDMARDs |
Placebo + cDMARDs |
OLUMIANT 2 mg/day + cDMARDs |
| N |
228 |
229 |
176 |
174 |
| Number of Tender Joints (0-68) |
| Baseline |
24 (15) |
24 (14) |
28 (16) |
31 (16) |
| Week 12 |
15 (14) |
11 (13) |
20 (16) |
19 (18) |
| Number of Swollen Joints (0-66) |
| Baseline |
13 (7) |
14 (9) |
17 (11) |
19 (12) |
| Week 12 |
8 (8) |
5 (6) |
12 (10) |
10 (12) |
| Painb |
| Baseline |
57 (23) |
60 (21) |
65 (19) |
62 (22) |
| Week 12 |
43 (24) |
34 (25) |
55 (25) |
46 (28) |
| Patient Global Assessmentb |
| Baseline |
60 (21) |
62 (20) |
66 (19) |
67 (19) |
| Week 12 |
44 (23) |
36 (25) |
56 (25) |
46 (26) |
| Physician Global Assessmentb |
| Baseline |
62 (17) |
64 (17) |
67 (19) |
67 (17) |
| Week 12 |
41 (24) |
33 (22) |
50 (26) |
36 (24) |
| Disability Index (HAQ-DI)c |
| Baseline |
1.50 (0.60) |
1.51 (0.62) |
1.78 (0.57) |
1.71 (0.55) |
| Week 12 |
1.17 (0.62) |
0.96 (0.69) |
1.59 (0.68) |
1.31 (0.72) |
| hsCRP (mg/L) |
| Baseline |
17.7 (20.4) |
18.2 (21.5) |
20.6 (25.3) |
19.9 (22.5) |
| Week 12 |
17.2 (19.3) |
8.6 (14.6) |
19.9 (23.0) |
13.5 (20.1) |
a Data shown are mean (standard deviation).
b Visual analog scale: 0=best, 100=worst.
c Health Assessment Questionnaire–Disability Index: 0=best, 3=worst; 20 questions; 8 categories: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. |
Figure 4: Percent of RA Patients Achieving ACR20 in Study RA-4
Physical Function Response
Improvement in physical function was measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). Patients receiving OLUMIANT 2 mg demonstrated greater improvement from baseline in physical functioning compared to placebo at Week 24. The mean difference (95% CI) from placebo in HAQ-DI change from baseline at Week 24 was -0.24 (-0.35, -0.14) in Study RA-3 and -0.23 (-0.35, -0.12) in Study RA-4.
Other Health Related Outcomes
General health status was assessed by the Short Form health survey (SF-36). In Studies RA-3 and RA-4, compared to placebo, patients treated with OLUMIANT 2 mg demonstrated greater improvement from baseline in the physical component summary (PCS) score and the physical function, role physical, bodily pain, vitality, and general health domains at Week 12, with no consistent improvements in the mental component summary (MCS) scores or the role emotional, mental health, and social functioning domains.
COVID-19
The efficacy and safety of baricitinib were assessed in 2 Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials:
- COVID I (NCT04401579), which evaluated the combination of baricitinib 4 mg + remdesivir compared to placebo + remdesivir.
- COVID II (NCT04421027), which evaluated baricitinib 4 mg compared to placebo. Patients could remain on background therapy, as defined per local guidelines. An additional exploratory sub-study in patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO at baseline was also conducted under this protocol and analyzed separately.
COVID I
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial (NCT04401579) of hospitalized adults with confirmed SARSCoV- 2 infection compared treatment with baricitinib plus remdesivir (n = 515) with placebo plus remdesivir (n = 518). Patients had to have laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection as well as at least one of the following to be enrolled in the trial: radiographic infiltrates by imaging, SpO2 ≤94% on room air, a requirement for supplemental oxygen, or a requirement for mechanical ventilation or ECMO. Patients treated with the combination received the following regimen:
- Baricitinib 4 mg once daily (orally) for up to 14 days or until hospital discharge, whichever came first
- Remdesivir 200 mg on Day 1 and 100 mg once daily (via intravenous infusion) on subsequent days for a total treatment duration of 10 days or until hospital discharge
In this study prophylaxis for venous thromboembolic event (VTEs) was recommended for all patients unless a major contraindication was noted.
For the overall population (N = 1033 patients) at randomization, mean age was 55 years (with 30% of patients aged 65 or older); 63% of patients were male, 51% were Hispanic or Latino, 48% were White, 15% were Black or African American, and 10% were Asian; 14% did not require supplemental oxygen, 55% required supplemental oxygen, 21% required noninvasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen, and 11% required invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO. The most common comorbidities were obesity (56%), hypertension (52%), and type 2 diabetes (37%). Demographics and disease characteristics were balanced across the combination group and the placebo group.
The primary endpoint, for the intent to treat population, was time to recovery within 29 days after randomization. Recovery was defined as being discharged from the hospital without limitations on activities, being discharged from the hospital with limitations on activities and/or requiring home oxygen or hospitalized but not requiring supplemental oxygen and no longer requiring medical care. The key secondary endpoint was clinical status on Day 15 assessed on an 8-point ordinal scale (OS) consisting of the following categories:
- Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities [OS-1];
- Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen [OS-2];
- Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care [OS-3];
- Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise) [OS 4];
- Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen [OS 5];
- Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen devices [OS 6];
- Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO [OS 7]; and
- Death [OS 8]
For the overall population, the median time to recovery (defined as discharged from hospital or hospitalized but not requiring supplemental oxygen or ongoing medical care) was 7 days for baricitinib + remdesivir compared to 8 days for placebo + remdesivir [hazard ratio: 1.16 (95% CI 1.01, 1.33); p = 0.035].
Patients assigned to baricitinib + remdesivir were more likely to have a better clinical status (according to an 8-point ordinal scale) at Day 15 compared to patients assigned to placebo + remdesivir [odds ratio: 1.26 (95% CI 1.01, 1.57); p = 0.044].
The proportion of patients who died or progressed to non-invasive ventilation/high-flow oxygen or invasive mechanical ventilation by Day 29 was lower in baricitinib + remdesivir (23%) compared to placebo + remdesivir (28%) [odds ratio: 0.74 (95% CI 0.56, 0.99); p = 0.039]. Patients who required non-invasive ventilation/high-flow oxygen or invasive mechanical ventilation (including ECMO) at baseline needed to worsen by at least 1 point on an 8-point ordinal scale to progress.
The proportion of patients who died by Day 29 was 4.7% (24/515) for baricitinib + remdesivir compared to 7.1% (37/518) for placebo + remdesivir [Kaplan Meier estimated difference in Day 29 probability of mortality: -2.6% (95% CI: -5.8%, 0.5%); hazard ratio = 0.65 (95% CI: 0.39, 1.09)].
COVID II
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial (NCT04421027) of hospitalized adults with confirmed SARSCoV- 2 infection compared treatment with baricitinib 4mg once daily (n = 764) with placebo (n = 761) for 14 days or hospital discharge, whichever came first. Patients could remain on background standard of care, as defined per local guidelines, including antimalarials, antivirals, corticosteroids, and/or azithromycin. In this study prophylaxis for venous thromboembolic event (VTE) was required for all patients unless contraindicated.
The most frequently used therapies at baseline were:
- corticosteroids (79% of patients, mostly dexamethasone)
- remdesivir (19% of patients)
Patients had to have laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, at least one instance of elevation in at least one inflammatory marker above the upper limit of normal according to local laboratory ranges (CRP, D-dimer, LDH, ferritin), and at least one of the following to be enrolled in the trial: radiographic infiltrates by imaging, SpO2 <94% on room air, evidence of active COVID infection (with clinical symptoms including any of the following: fever, vomiting, diarrhea, dry cough, tachypnea defined as respiratory rate >24 breaths/min) or requirement for supplemental oxygen.
For the overall population (N = 1525 patients) at randomization, mean age was 58 years (with 33% of patients aged 65 or older); 63% of patients were male, 60% were White, 5% were Black or African American, 11% were Asian; 12% did not require supplemental oxygen (OS 4), 63% required supplemental oxygen (OS 5), 24% required non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen (OS 6). The most common comorbidities were hypertension (48%), obesity (33%), and type 2 diabetes (29%). Demographics and disease characteristics were balanced across the baricitinib and placebo groups.
The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who died or progressed to non-invasive ventilation/high-flow oxygen or invasive mechanical ventilation within the first 28-days of the study. Patients who required non-invasive ventilation/highflow oxygen at baseline needed to worsen by at least 1 point on an 8-point OS to progress (refer to the description of COVID I for the definition of the 8-point OS). A key secondary endpoint was all-cause mortality by Day 28.
The estimated proportion of patients who died or progressed to non-invasive ventilation/high-flow oxygen or invasive mechanical ventilation was lower in patients treated with baricitinib (27.8%) compared to placebo (30.5%), but this effect was not statistically significant [odds ratio: 0.85 (95% CI 0.67, 1.08); p = 0.180].
The proportion of patients who died by Day 28 was 8.1% (62/764) for baricitinib compared to 13.3% (101/761) for placebo [estimated difference in Day 28 probability of mortality = -4.9% (95% CI: -8.0%, -1.9%); hazard ratio = 0.56 (95% CI: 0.41, 0.77)].
COVID II Exploratory Sub-Study
In a separate group of patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO at baseline and enrolled in an addendum to COVID II, a pre-specified exploratory analysis showed that the proportion who died by Day 28 was 39.2% (20/51) for baricitinib compared to 58.0% (29/50) for placebo [estimated difference in Day 28 risk of mortality = -18.8% (95% CI: -36.3%, 0.6%); hazard ratio = 0.54 (95% CI: 0.31, 0.96)].
Alopecia Areata
Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials [Trials AA-1 (NCT03570749) and AA-2 (NCT03899259)] enrolled a total of 1200 patients, with alopecia areata (AA), who had at least 50% scalp hair loss as measured by the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) for more than 6 months. The trials enrolled males 18 to 60 years of age and females 18 to 70 years of age. Among the patients enrolled, 61% were female, 2% were 65 years of age or older, and 52% were White, 36% were Asian, and 8% were Black. At baseline, 53% of patients had at least 95% scalp hair loss, 34% had their current episode lasting at least 4 years, 69% had significant gaps in eyebrow hair or no notable eyebrow hair, and 58% had significant gaps in eyelashes or no notable eyelashes.
In the Phase 3 portion of Trial AA-1 and in Trial AA-2, patients received OLUMIANT 2 mg, OLUMIANT 4 mg, or placebo once daily.
Both trials assessed the proportion of patients who achieved at least 80% scalp hair coverage (SALT score of ≤20) at Week 36 as the primary endpoint. Other outcomes at Week 36 included the proportion of patients who achieved at least 90% scalp hair coverage (SALT score of ≤10), patients with Scalp Hair Assessment PRO™ score of 0 or 1 with at least 2- point reduction on the 5-point scale, and assessments of eyebrow and eyelash hair loss.
Clinical Response
The results of the OLUMIANT trials (AA-1 and AA-2) are provided in Table 14 and Figure 5.
Table 14: Clinical Response at Week 36 in Patients with Severe AA
|
Trial AA-1 |
Trial AA-2 |
| Placebo |
OLUMIANT
2 mg/day |
OLUMIANT
4 mg/day |
Placebo |
OLUMIANT
2 mg/day |
OLUMIANT
4 mg/day |
| Number of subjects with at least 50% scalp hair loss at baseline |
| N |
189 |
184 |
281 |
156 |
156 |
234 |
| SALT ≤ 20 |
5% |
22% |
35% |
3% |
17% |
32% |
Difference from Placebo
(95% CI) |
|
16%
(10, 23) |
30%
(23, 36) |
|
15%
(8, 22) |
30%
(23, 36) |
| SALT ≤ 10 |
4% |
13% |
26% |
1% |
11% |
24% |
Difference from Placebo
(95% CI) |
|
9%
(3, 15) |
22%
(16, 28) |
|
10%
(5, 16)a |
23%
(17, 29) |
| Number of subjects reporting Scalp Hair Assessment PRO™ score ≥3 at baseline |
| N |
181 |
175 |
275 |
151 |
149 |
215 |
| Scalp Hair Assessment PRO score of 0 or 1b |
5% |
16% |
33% |
4% |
16% |
34% |
Difference from Placebo
(95% CI) |
|
11%
(5, 18) |
28%
(21, 34) |
|
12%
(5, 19) |
30%
(23, 37) |
a Not statistically significant under the multiplicity control plan
b Patients evaluated scalp hair coverage on a 5-point scale where 0 = No missing hair (0% of scalp hair missing; full head of hair), 1 = A limited area of scalp hair loss (1% to 20%), 2 = moderate scalp hair loss (21% to 49%), 3 = a large area of scalp hair loss (50% to 94%), and 4 = nearly all or all scalp hair loss (95% to 100%). |
Among patients with substantial eyebrow and eyelash hair loss at baseline, an improvement in eyebrow and eyelash coverage was observed on OLUMIANT 4 mg once daily dosage at Week 36.
Figure 5: Percent of Patients Achieving SALT ≤20
Analyses by age, gender, race, and body weight did not identify differences in response to 36-weeks of treatment with OLUMIANT among these subgroups. SALT ≤20 response rates were higher in all dose groups in patients with baseline SALT 50 to 94 versus SALT 95 to 100. See Table 15.
Table 15: SALT ≤20 at Week 36 by Baseline SALT Severity in AA
|
Trials AA-1 and AA-2 |
| Placebo |
OLUMIANT 2 mg/day |
OLUMIANT 4 mg/day |
| 50 % to 94% Scalp Hair Loss |
| N |
166 |
147 |
248 |
| SALT ≤20 |
8% |
33% |
48% |
| 95 % to 100% Scalp Hair Loss |
| N |
178 |
193 |
267 |
| SALT ≤20 |
1% |
10% |
21% |
In AA-2, patients who achieved adequate response (SALT ≤20) to OLUMIANT 4 mg once daily at 52 weeks of treatment entered a randomized down-titration period and received OLUMIANT 2 mg once daily or remained on OLUMIANT 4 mg once daily. After an additional 24 weeks of treatment (76 weeks total), 75% (30/40) of patients randomized to OLUMIANT 2 mg once daily maintained response and 98% (41/42) of patients who remained on OLUMIANT 4 mg once daily maintained response.