Clinical Pharmacology for Nubeqa
Mechanism Of Action
Darolutamide is an androgen receptor (AR) inhibitor. Darolutamide competitively inhibits androgen binding, AR nuclear translocation, and AR-mediated transcription. A major metabolite, ketodarolutamide, exhibited similar in vitro activity to darolutamide. In addition, darolutamide functioned as a progesterone receptor (PR) antagonist in vitro (approximately 1% activity compared to AR). Darolutamide decreased prostate cancer cell proliferation in vitro and tumor volume in mouse xenograft models of prostate cancer.
Pharmacodynamics
PSA reduction was observed in CRPC patients receiving darolutamide doses of 100-900 mg twice a day, reaching a plateau of PSA reduction at the 600 mg twice daily dose.
Twice daily dosing of 600 mg darolutamide in nmCRPC patients resulted in undetectable PSA levels in 24% of patients at 12 months compared to 0.4% of patients in the placebo arm.
Twice daily dosing of 600 mg darolutamide in mCSPC patients resulted in undetectable PSA levels (<0.2 ng/mL) in 63% of patients compared to 19% of patients in the placebo arm.
Twice daily dosing of 600 mg darolutamide in combination with docetaxel in mCSPC patients resulted in undetectable PSA levels in 60% of patients at 12 months compared to 26% of patients in the placebo with docetaxel arm.
Cardiac Electrophysiology
The effect of darolutamide (600 mg twice daily) on the QTc interval was evaluated in a subgroup of 500 patients in the ARAMIS study. No large mean increase in QTc (i.e., > 20 ms) was detected.
Pharmacokinetics
Following administration of 600 mg twice daily, darolutamide mean (%CV) steady-state peak plasma concentration (Cmax) is 4.79 mg/L (30.9%) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 12 hours (AUC12h) is 52.82 h•μg/mL (33.9%). Steady-state is reached 2–5 days after repeated dosing with food, with an approximate 2-fold accumulation.
The exposure (Cmax and AUC12) of the darolutamide and the active metabolite ketodarolutamide increase in a nearly dose-proportional manner in the dose range of 100 to 700 mg (0.17 to 1.17 times the approved recommended dosage). No further increase in darolutamide exposure was observed at 900 mg twice daily (1.5 times the approved recommended dosage).
Absorption
Darolutamide Cmax is reached approximately 4 hours after administration of a single 600 mg oral dose.
The absolute bioavailability is approximately 30% following oral administration of a NUBEQA tablet containing 300 mg darolutamide under fasted conditions.
Food Effect
Bioavailability of darolutamide increased by 2.0- to 2.5-fold when administered with food. A similar increase of exposure was observed for the active metabolite ketodarolutamide.
Distribution
The apparent volume of distribution of darolutamide after intravenous administration is 119 L.
Protein binding is 92% for darolutamide and 99.8% for the active metabolite, ketodarolutamide. Serum albumin is the main binding protein for darolutamide and ketodarolutamide.
Elimination
The effective half-life of darolutamide and ketodarolutamide is approximately 20 hours in patients. The clearance (%CV) of darolutamide following intravenous administration is 116 mL/min (39.7%).
Metabolism
Darolutamide is primarily metabolized by CYP3A4, as well as by UGT1A9 and UGT1A1. Ketodarolutamide total exposure in plasma is 1.7-fold higher compared to darolutamide.
Excretion
After a single radiolabeled dose as an oral solution, a total of 63.4% of darolutamide-related material is excreted in the urine (approximately 7% unchanged) and 32.4% (approximately 30% unchanged) in the feces. More than 95% of the dose was recovered within 7 days after administration.
Specific Populations
No clinically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of darolutamide were observed based on age (41-95 years), race (White, Asian, Black or African American), mild to moderate renal impairment (eGFR 30–89 mL/min/1.73m²), or mild hepatic impairment.
In non-cancer subjects with severe renal impairment (eGFR 15–29 mL/min/1.73 m²) not receiving dialysis or with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class B), NUBEQA exposure increased by about 2.5- and 1.9-fold, respectively, compared to healthy subjects.
The effect of end-stage renal disease (eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m²) or severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh C) on darolutamide pharmacokinetics has not been studied.
Drug Interaction Studies
Clinical Studies
Combined P-gp And Strong CYP3A4 Inducers
Concomitant use of rifampicin (a combined P-gp and strong CYP3A4 inducer) decreased mean darolutamide AUC0-72 by 72% and Cmax by 52%. The decrease of darolutamide exposure by moderate CYP3A4 inducers is expected to be in the range of 36% – 58%.
Combined P-gp And Strong CYP3A4 Inhibitors
Itraconazole (a strong combined CYP3A4 and P-gp inhibitor) increased mean darolutamide AUC0-72 by 1.7- and Cmax by 1.4-fold.
CYP3A4 substrates
Concomitant use of darolutamide decreased the mean AUC and Cmax of midazolam (CYP3A4 substrate) by 29% and 32%, respectively. No clinically relevant differences in the pharmacokinetics of midazolam were observed when used concomitantly with darolutamide.
BCRP, OATP1B1 And OATP1B3 Substrates
Concomitant use of darolutamide increased the mean AUC and Cmax of rosuvastatin (BCRP, OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 substrate) by approximately 5-fold.
Docetaxel
Administration of darolutamide in combination with docetaxel resulted in no clinically relevant changes in the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel in mCSPC patients. There were no clinically relevant changes in the pharmacokinetics of darolutamide, when used in combination with docetaxel.
P-gp Substrates
No clinically relevant differences in the pharmacokinetics of dabigatran (P-gp substrate) were observed when used concomitantly with darolutamide.
In vitro, darolutamide did not inhibit the major CYP enzymes (CYP1A2, 2A6, 2B6, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, 2E1, and 3A4) or transporters (MRP2, BSEP, OATs, OCTs, MATEs, OATP2B1, and NTCP) at clinically relevant concentrations.
Clinical Studies
Non-Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer
ARAMIS (NCT02200614) was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in 1509 patients with non-metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer with a prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSADT) of ≤ 10 months. Randomization was stratified by PSADT and use of bone-targeted therapy at study entry. Patients with pelvic lymph nodes less than 2 cm in short axis below the aortic bifurcation and patients. Absence or presence of metastasis was assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR). PSA results were not blinded and were not used for treatment discontinuation.
Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either 600 mg NUBEQA orally twice daily (n=955) or matching placebo (n=554). Treatment continued until radiographic disease progression as assessed by CT, MRI, 99mTc bone scan by BICR, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal. All patients received a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analog concurrently or had a bilateral orchiectomy.
The median age was 74 years (range 48–95) and 9% of patients were 85 years of age or older. The racial distribution included 79% White, 13% Asian, 3% Black or African American, while ethnicity included 3.1% Hispanic or Latino patients. A majority of patients (73%) had a Gleason score of 7 or higher at diagnosis. The median PSADT was 4.5 months. Forty-two percent of patients in both treatment arms had prior surgery or radiotherapy to the prostate. Eleven percent of patients had enlarged pelvic lymph nodes less than 2 cm at study entry. Six percent of patients were retrospectively identified by BICR as having metastases at baseline. Seventy-three percent of patients received prior treatment with an anti-androgen (bicalutamide or flutamide). All patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) score of 0 or 1 at study entry. At baseline, 47% of patients reported no pain on the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (a 7-day diary average of the daily worst pain item). There were 12 patients (1.3%) enrolled on the NUBEQA arm with a history of seizure.
The major efficacy endpoint was metastasis free survival (MFS), defined as the time from randomization to the time of first evidence of BICR-confirmed distant metastasis or death from any cause within 33 weeks after the last evaluable scan, whichever occurred first. Distant metastasis was defined as new bone or soft tissue lesions or enlarged lymph nodes above the aortic bifurcation. Overall survival (OS), time to pain progression, and time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy, were additional efficacy endpoints.
Treatment with NUBEQA resulted in a statistically significant improvement in MFS compared to placebo. At the protocol-specified final analysis of OS, treatment with NUBEQA resulted in a statistically significant improvement in OS compared to placebo. The final analysis of OS and time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy was event-driven and conducted after 254 OS events had occurred. The efficacy results from ARAMIS are summarized in Table 7 and Figure 1.
Table 7: Efficacy Results from the ARAMIS Study
|
NUBEQA
(N=955) |
Placebo
(N=554) |
| Metastasis-free survival1 |
| Distant Metastasis or Death (%) |
221 (23) |
216 (39) |
| Median, months (95% CI)2 |
40.4 (34.3, NR) |
18.4 (15.5, 22.3) |
| Hazard Ratio (95% CI)3 |
0.41 (0.34, 0.50) |
| P-value4 |
<0.0001 |
| Overall survival4 |
| Deaths (%) |
148 (15) |
106 (19) |
| Median, months (95% CI)2 |
NR (56.1, NR) |
NR (46.9, NR) |
| Hazard Ratio (95% CI)3 |
0.69 (0.53, 0.88) |
| P-value5 |
0.003 |
NR: not reached
1 Locoregional-only progression occurred in 6% of patients overall.
2 Based on Kaplan-Meier estimates
3 Hazard ratio is based on a stratified Cox regression model. Hazard ratio < 1 favors NUBEQA.
4 The pre-specified final OS analysis was event-driven and occurred 14 months after the MFS analysis
5 P-value is based on a log-rank test stratified by PSADT (≤ 6 months vs. > 6 months) and use of osteoclast-targeted therapy (yes vs. no) |
Figure 1: Kaplan-Meier Curve Metastasis Free Survival; Intent-To-Treat nmCRPC population (ARAMIS)
Figure 2: Kaplan-Meier curves of Overall Survival; Intent-To-Treat nmCRPC population (ARAMIS)
MFS results were consistent across patient subgroups for PSADT (≤ 6 months or > 6 months) or prior use of bone-targeting agents (yes or no).
Treatment with NUBEQA resulted in a statistically significant delay in time to pain progression (HR = 0.65, 95% CI= 0.53, 0.79; p < 0.0001). Time to pain progression was defined as at least a 2-point worsening from baseline of the pain score on Brief Pain Inventory Short Form or initiation of opioids and reported in 28% of all patients on study.
Treatment with NUBEQA resulted in a statistically significant delay in the initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy (HR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.44, 0.76; p < 0.0001).
Metastatic Castration Sensitive Prostate Cancer (mCSPC)
ARANOTE
ARANOTE (NCT02799602) was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 669 patients with mCSPC. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive 600 mg NUBEQA orally twice daily (n=446) or matching placebo (n=223). Patients with both high- and low-volume mCSPC were eligible for the study. High-volume disease was defined as presence of visceral metastases, or 4 or more bone lesions, with at least 1 metastasis beyond the vertebral column and pelvic bones. Randomization was stratified by presence of visceral metastasis and use of prior local therapy at study entry. All patients received a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist or antagonist concurrently or had a bilateral orchiectomy. Treatment with NUBEQA or placebo continued until progressive disease, change of antineoplastic therapy, unacceptable toxicity, death, or withdrawal.
The median age was 70 years (range 43-93) and 29% of patients were 75 years of age or older. The racial distribution was 56% White, 31% Asian, and 10% Black; while ethnicity included 24% Hispanic patients. Sixty-eight percent (68%) of patients had a Gleason score of 8 or higher at diagnosis. At study entry, ECOG PS of 0, 1, and 2 were 50%, 47%, and 3%, respectively. Seventy-three percent (73%) of patients had de novo disease and 22% had recurrent disease. Seventy-one percent (71%) of patients had high-volume disease, including 12% with visceral metastases, and 29% had low-volume disease. The median PSA level at baseline was 21 μg/L. One patient (0.2%) with a medical history of seizure was treated with NUBEQA in ARANOTE.
The major efficacy outcome measure was radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), defined as the time from randomization to radiological disease progression or death by central blinded review. Radiographic disease progression was defined by identification of 2 or more new bone lesions on a bone scan with confirmation (Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 criteria) and/or progression in soft tissue disease. Additional efficacy outcome measure was overall survival (OS).
Treatment with NUBEQA resulted in a statistically significant improvement in rPFS compared to placebo. There was no statistically significant improvement in OS.
Efficacy results for ARANOTE are shown in Table 8 and Figure 3.
Table 8: Efficacy Results in Patients with mCSPC in ARANOTE
| Efficacy Endpoint |
NUBEQA
(N=446) |
Placebo
(N=223) |
| Radiographic Progression-Free Survival |
| Patients with event, n(%) |
128 (29) |
94 (42) |
| Median, months (95%CI) |
NR (NR, NR) |
25 (19, NR) |
| Hazard ratio (95% CI)1 |
0.54 (0.41, 0.71) |
| p-value2 |
<0.0001 |
| Overall Survival3 |
| Patients with event, n (%) |
115 (26) |
70 (31) |
| Median, months (95% CI) |
NR (NR, NR) |
NR (NR, NR) |
| Hazard Ratio (95% CI)1 |
0.78 (0.58, 1.05) |
| p-value2 |
NS |
NR: not reached
NS: not statistically significant
1 Based on stratified Cox regression model
2 Based on stratified log-rank test |
Figure 3: Kaplan-Meier Curves for Radiographic Progression-Free Survival; mCSPC population (ARANOTE)
ARASENS
ARASENS (NCT02799602) was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in 1306 patients with mCSPC. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 600 mg NUBEQA orally twice daily (n=651) or matching placebo (n=655), concomitantly with 75 mg/m² of docetaxel for 6 cycles. All patients received a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist or antagonist concurrently or had a bilateral orchiectomy. Treatment with NUBEQA or placebo continued until symptomatic progressive disease, change of antineoplastic therapy, or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with regional lymph node involvement only (M0) were excluded from the study. Patients were stratified by extent of disease (non–regional lymph nodes metastases only (M1a), bone metastases with or without lymph node metastases (M1b) or visceral metastases with or without lymph node metastases or with or without bone metastases (M1c)) and by alkaline phosphatase level (< or ≥ upper limit of normal) at study entry.
The median age was 67 years (range 41–89) and 17% of patients were 75 years of age or older. The racial distribution included 52% White, 36% Asian, 4% Black, while ethnicity included 7% Hispanic patients. Seventy-eight percent (78%) of patients had a Gleason score of ≥8 at diagnosis. Seventy one percent (71%) of patients had an ECOG performance status score of 0 and 29% patients had an ECOG performance status score of 1. There were 86% of patients with de novo and 13% with recurrent disease. At initial diagnosis of metastatic disease, 3% had M1a, 83% had M1b and 14% had M1c disease; alkaline phosphatase was < ULN in 45% of patients and ≥ ULN in 55% of patients; median PSA level at baseline was 30 μg/L and 24 μg/L for NUBEQA vs placebo group, respectively. Four patients (0.6%) with a medical history of seizure were treated with NUBEQA with docetaxel in ARASENS.
The major efficacy outcome measure was overall survival (OS). Time to pain progression was an additional efficacy outcome measure.
Treatment with NUBEQA with docetaxel resulted in a statistically significant improvement in OS compared to placebo with docetaxel. OS results were consistent across stratified subgroups (extent of disease and alkaline phosphatase level).
Efficacy results are shown in Table 9 and Figure 4.
Table 9: Efficacy Results from the ARASENS study
|
NUBEQA with docetaxel
(N=651) |
Placebo with docetaxel
(N=654)1 |
| Overall survival |
| Deaths (%) |
229 (35) |
304 (46) |
| Median in months (95% CI) |
NR (NR, NR) |
48.9 (44.4, NR) |
| Hazard Ratio (95% CI)2 |
0.68 (0.57, 0.80) |
| P-value3 |
<0.0001 |
NR: not reached
1 One patient in the placebo arm was excluded from all analyses due to the violation of Good Clinical Practices
2 Hazard ratio < 1 favors NUBEQA
3 P-value is one-sided, and based on a log-rank test stratified by extent of disease (non-regional lymph nodes metastases only or bone metastases with or without lymph node metastases or visceral metastases with or without lymph node metastases or with or without bone metastases) and Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP < ULN or ALP ≥ ULN) |
Figure 4: Kaplan-Meier curves of Overall Survival; mCSPC population (ARASENS)
Treatment with NUBEQA with docetaxel resulted in a statistically significant delay in time to pain progression (HR = 0.79, 95% CI= 0.66, 0.95; 1-sided p value = 0.006). Time to pain progression was defined as the time from randomization to the time of pain progression. Pain progression is defined as:
- An increase of 2 or more points in the “worst pain in 24 hours” score (WPS) from nadir observed at 2 consecutive evaluations at least 4 weeks apart, or initiation of short- or long-acting opioid use for pain for at least 7 consecutive days, for asymptomatic patients (WPS=0) at baseline
- An increase of 2 or more points in the “worst pain in 24 hours” score (WPS) from nadir observed at 2 consecutive evaluations at least 4 weeks apart, and a WPS of 4 or greater, or initiation of short- or long-acting opioid use for pain for at least 7 consecutive days, for symptomatic patients (WPS ≥ 1) at baseline
Patients with opioid use within 4 weeks before randomization were censored at randomization in this analysis (125 patients (19%) in the NUBEQA with docetaxel arm and 118 patients (18%) in the placebo with docetaxel arm).