Clinical Pharmacology for Kevzara
Mechanism Of Action
Sarilumab binds to both soluble and membrane-bound IL-6 receptors (sIL-6R and mIL-6R), and has been shown to inhibit IL-6-mediated signaling through these receptors. IL-6 is a pleiotropic pro-inflammatory cytokine produced by a variety of cell types including T- and B-cells, lymphocytes, monocytes, and fibroblasts. IL-6 has been shown to be involved in diverse physiological processes such as T-cell activation, induction of immunoglobulin secretion, initiation of hepatic acute phase protein synthesis, and stimulation of hematopoietic precursor cell proliferation and differentiation. IL-6 is also produced by synovial and endothelial cells leading to local production of IL-6 in joints affected by inflammatory processes such as rheumatoid arthritis.
Pharmacodynamics
Following single-dose subcutaneous administration of sarilumab 200-mg and 150-mg in patients with RA, rapid reduction of CRP levels was observed. Levels were reduced to normal within 2 weeks after treatment initiation. Following single-dose sarilumab admin- istration, in patients with RA, absolute neutrophil counts decreased to the nadir between 3 to 4 days and thereafter recovered towards baseline [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS]. Treatment with sarilumab resulted in decreases in fibrinogen and serum amyloid A, and increases in hemoglobin and serum albumin. In patients with pJIA, decreases in CRP, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and neutrophil count were observed after KEVZARA administration.
Pharmacokinetics
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Absorption
The pharmacokinetics of sarilumab were characterized in 1770 adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with sarilumab which included 631 patients treated with 150 mg and 682 patients treated with 200 mg doses by subcutaneous injection every two weeks for up to 52 weeks. The median tmax was observed in 2 to 4 days.
At steady state, exposure over the dosing interval measured by area under curve (AUC) increased 2-fold with an increase in dose from 150 to 200 mg every two weeks. Steady state was reached in 14 to 16 weeks with a 2- to 3-fold accumulation compared to single dose exposure.
For the 150 mg every two weeks dose regimen, the estimated mean (± SD) steady-state AUC, Cmin and Cmax of sarilumab were 202 ± 120 mg.day/L, 6.35 ± 7.54 mg/L, and 20.0 ± 9.20 mg/L, respectively.
For the 200 mg every two weeks dose regimen, the estimated mean (± SD) steady-state AUC, Cmin and Cmax of sarilumab were 395 ± 207 mg.day/L, 16.5 ± 14.1 mg/L, and 35.6 ± 15.2 mg/L, respectively.
Distribution
In patients with RA, the apparent volume of distribution at steady state was 7.3 L.
Elimination
Sarilumab is eliminated by parallel linear and non-linear pathways. At higher concentra- tions, the elimination is predominantly through the linear, non-saturable proteolytic pathway, while at lower concentrations, non-linear saturable target-mediated elimination predominates. The half-life of sarilumab is concentration-dependent. At 200 mg every 2 weeks, the concentration-dependent half-life is up to 10 days in patients with RA at steady state. At 150 mg every 2 weeks, the concentration-dependent half-life is up to 8 days in patients with RA at steady state.
After the last steady state dose of 150 mg and 200 mg sarilumab, the median times to non-detectable concentration are 28 and 43 days, respectively. Population pharmacokinetic analyses in patients with RA revealed that there was a trend toward higher apparent clearance of sarilumab in the presence of anti-sarilumab anti- bodies.
Metabolism
The metabolic pathway of sarilumab has not been characterized. As a monoclonal antibody sarilumab is expected to be degraded into small peptides and amino acids via catabolic pathways in the same manner as endogenous IgG.
Excretion
Monoclonal antibodies, including sarilumab, are not eliminated via renal or hepatic pathways.
Polymyalgia Rheumatica
The pharmacokinetic profile of subcutaneous sarilumab in PMR patients was determined using a population pharmacokinetic analysis on a data set including 58 PMR patients treated with repeated subcutaneous administration of sarilumab 200 mg every two weeks. In general, pharmacokinetic exposures were higher in patients with PMR when compared to patients with RA. For this dose regimen, the estimated mean (± SD) steady-state AUC, Cmin and Cmax of sarilumab were 551 ± 321 mg.day/L, 27.0 ± 21.5 mg/L, and 46.5 ± 23.0 mg/L, respectively. The median time to steady state in PMR patients was estimated to be 28 weeks. There was accumulation following subcutaneous administration of sarilumab 200 mg, with an accumulation ratio of approximately 6-fold based on the mean trough concentrations.
Polyarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (pJIA)
The pharmacokinetics of sarilumab in pJIA patients was characterized by a population pharmacokinetic analysis which included 101 pediatric patients 2 to 17 years of age who were treated with repeated subcutaneous doses of sarilumab.
For 3 mg/kg sarilumab (patients with a body weight ≥ 30 kg) given every 2 weeks, the estimated mean (±SD) steady-state AUC, Cmin, and Cmax of sarilumab were 276 ± 121 mg.day/L, 9.57 ± 5.84 mg/L, and 27.1 ± 11.6 mg/L, respectively.
For 4 mg/kg sarilumab (patients with a body weight 10 to <30 kg) given every 2 weeks, the estimated mean (± SD) steady-state AUC, Cmin, and Cmax of sarilumab were 395 ± 101 mg.day/L, 14.4 ± 9.81 mg/L, and 40.4 ± 7.77 mg/L, respectively.
Steady state was reached in 12 to 28 weeks with a 2- to 4-fold accumulation compared to single dose exposure for 3 and 4 mg/kg q2w. Steady state concentrations were within the range of exposures in adult RA patients following 150 mg/200 mg every 2 weeks.
Specific Populations
Population pharmacokinetic analyses in adult patients showed that age, gender and race did not meaningfully influence the pharmacokinetics of sarilumab. Although body weight influenced the pharmacokinetics of sarilumab, no dose adjustments are recommended for any of these demographics in adult patients.
Hepatic Impairment
No formal study of the effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of sarilumab was conducted.
Renal Impairment
No formal study of the effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of sarilumab was conducted. Based on population pharmacokinetic analysis of data from 1770 patients with RA, including patients with mild (creatinine clearance (CLcr): 60 to 90 mL/min; N=471 at baseline) or moderate (CLcr: 30 to 60 mL/min; N=74 at baseline) renal impairment, CLcr was correlated with sarilumab exposure. However, the effect of CLcr on exposure is not sufficient to warrant a dose adjustment [see Use In Specific Populations]. Patients with severe renal impairment were not studied.
Drug-Drug Interactions
CYP450 Substrates
Simvastatin is a CYP3A4 and OATP1B1 substrate. In 17 patients with RA, one week following a single 200-mg subcutaneous administration of sarilumab, exposure of simv- astatin and simvastatin acid decreased by 45% and 36%, respectively [see DRUG INTERACTIONS].
Immunogenicity
As with all therapeutic proteins, there is potential for immunogenicity. The detection of antibody formation is highly dependent on the sensitivity and specificity of the assay. Additionally, the observed incidence of antibody (including neutralizing antibody) positivity in an assay may be influenced by several factors, including assay methodology, sample handling, timing of sample collection, concomitant medications, and underlying disease. For these reasons, comparison of the incidence of antibodies to sarilumab in the studies described below with the incidence of antibodies in other studies or to other products may be misleading.
In the RA pre-rescue population, 4.0% of patients treated with KEVZARA 200 mg + DMARD, 5.7% of patients treated with KEVZARA 150 mg + DMARD and 1.9% of patients treated with placebo + DMARD, exhibited an anti-drug antibody (ADA) response. Neutralizing antibodies (NAb) were detected in 1.0% of patients on KEVZARA 200 mg + DMARD, 1.6% of patients on KEVZARA 150 mg + DMARD, and 0.2% of patients on placebo + DMARD.
In RA patients treated with KEVZARA monotherapy, 9.2% of patients exhibited an ADA response with 6.9% of patients also exhibiting NAbs. Prior to administration of KEVZARA, 2.3% of patients exhibited an ADA response.
No correlation was observed between ADA development and either loss of efficacy or adverse reactions in RA patients.
In the PMR population, 1 patient (1.8%) in the KEVZARA 200 mg + 14-week corticosteroid taper group exhibited an ADA response. None of the patients in the placebo + 52-week corticosteroid taper group exhibited an ADA response. Neutralizing antibodies were detected in the PMR patient with ADA response on KEVZARA 200 mg; the patient did not demonstrate a clinical response. Because of the low occurrence of anti-drug antibodies, the effect of these antibodies on the safety, and/or effectiveness of sarilumab is unknown. In the pJIA population, 3 (4.3%) patients treated with the recommended dose exhibited an anti-drug antibody (ADA) response. Neutralizing antibodies were detected in one Pjia patient with ADA response. Because of the low occurrence of anti-drug antibodies, the effect of these antibodies on the safety, and/or effectiveness of sarilumab is unknown.
Clinical Studies
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Design Of Clinical Studies In Adults With Moderately To Severely Active RA
The efficacy and safety of KEVZARA in RA were assessed in two randomized, double- blind, placebo-controlled multicenter studies (Study 1 and Study 2) in patients older than 18 years with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) diagnosed according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria. Patients had at least 8 tender and 6 swollen joints at baseline.
Study 1 (NCT01061736) evaluated 1197 patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis who had inadequate clinical response to methotrexate (MTX). Patients received subcutaneous KEVZARA 200 mg, KEVZARA 150 mg, or placebo every two weeks with concomitant MTX. After Week 16 in Study 1, patients with an inadequate response could have been rescued with KEVZARA 200 mg every two weeks.
Study 2 (NCT01146652) evaluated 546 patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis who had an inadequate clinical response or were intolerant to one or more TNF- α antagonists. Patients received subcutaneous KEVZARA 200 mg, KEVZARA 150 mg, or placebo every two weeks with concomitant conventional DMARDs (MTX, sulfasalazine, leflunomide, and/or hydroxychloroquine). After Week 12 in Study 2, patients with an inadequate response could have been rescued with KEVZARA 200 mg every two weeks.
In Studies 1 and 2, the primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved an ACR20 response at Week 24. Other key endpoints evaluated included change from baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 16 in Study 1 and at Week 12 in Study 2, and change from baseline in van der Heijde-modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 52 in Study 1.
Clinical Response
The percentages of KEVZARA every two weeks + MTX/DMARD-treated patients achieving ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 responses in Studies 1 and 2 are shown Table 4. In both studies, patients treated with either 200 mg or 150 mg of KEVZARA every two weeks + MTX/DMARD had higher ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rates versus placebo + MTX/DMARD-treated patients at Week 24.
In Studies 1 and 2, a greater proportion of patients treated with KEVZARA 200 mg or 150 mg every two weeks plus MTX/DMARD achieved a low level of disease activity as measured by a Disease Activity Score 28-C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) <2.6 com- pared with placebo + MTX/DMARD at the end of the studies (Table 4). In Study 1, the proportion of patients achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 who had at least 3 or more active joints at the end of Week 24 was 33.1%, 37.8% and 20%, in the KEVZARA 200 mg + MTX/DMARD arm, KEVZARA 150 mg + MTX/DMARD arm, and placebo arm respectively.
Table 4: Clinical Response in Placebo-Controlled Studies 1 and 2 in Adults with Moderately to Severely Active RA*
|
Percentage of Patients |
| Study 1 |
Study 2 |
Placebo + MTX
N=398 |
KEVZARA 150 mg + MTX
N=400 |
KEVZARA 200 mg + MTX
N=399 |
Placebo + DMARD(s)†
N=181 |
KEVZARA 150 mg + DMARD(s)†
N=181 |
KEVZARA 200 mg + DMARD(s)†
N=184 |
| ACR20 |
| Week 12 |
34.7% |
54.0% |
64.9% |
37.6% |
54.1% |
62.5% |
| Difference from placebo (95% CI)‡ |
|
19.4% (12.6%, 26.1%) |
30.2% (23.6%, 36.8%) |
|
16.6% (6.7%, 26.5%) |
25.3% (15.7%, 34.8%) |
| Week 24§ |
33.4% |
58.0% |
66.4% |
33.7% |
55.8% |
60.9% |
| Difference from placebo (95% CI)‡ |
|
24.6% (18.0%, 31.3%) |
33.0% (26.5%, 39.5%) |
|
22.1% (12.6%, 31.6%) |
27.4% (17.7%, 37.0%) |
| Week 52 |
31.7% |
53.5% |
58.6% |
|
|
|
| Difference from placebo (95% CI)‡ |
|
21.9% (15.2%, 28.5%) |
27.0% (20.5%, 33.6%) |
NA¶ |
NA¶ |
NA¶ |
| ACR50 |
| Week 12 |
12.3% |
26.5% |
36.3% |
13.3% |
30.4% |
33.2% |
| Difference from placebo (95% CI)‡ |
|
14.2% (8.9%, 19.6%) |
24.1% (18.4%, 29.8%) |
|
17.1% (9.2%, 25.1%) |
20.1% (12.0%, 28.3%) |
| Week 24 |
16.6% |
37.0% |
45.6% |
18.2% |
37.0% |
40.8% |
| Difference from placebo (95% CI)‡ |
|
20.4% (14.5%, 26.3%) |
29.1% (23.0%, 35.1%) |
|
18.8% (10.2%, 27.4%) |
22.8% (14.0%, 31.6%) |
| Week 52 |
18.1% |
40.0% |
42.9% |
|
|
|
| Difference from placebo (95% CI)‡ |
|
21.9% (15.8%, 28.0%) |
24.8% (18.7%, 30.9%) |
NA¶ |
NA¶ |
NA¶ |
| ACR70 |
| Week 12 |
4.0% |
11.0% |
17.5% |
2.2% |
13.8% |
14.7% |
| Difference from placebo (95% CI)‡ |
|
7.0% (3.4%, 10.6%) |
13.5% (9.4%, 17.7%) |
|
11.6% (6.2%, 17.0%) |
12.5% (7.1%, 17.9%) |
| Week 24 |
7.3% |
19.8% |
24.8% |
7.2% |
19.9% |
16.3% |
| Difference from placebo (95% CI)‡ |
|
12.5% (7.8%, 17.1%) |
17.5% (12.6%, 22.5%) |
|
12.7% (6.1%, 19.3%) |
9.2% (2.8%, 15.7%) |
| Week 52 |
9.0% |
24.8% |
26.8% |
|
|
|
| Difference from placebo (95% CI)‡ |
|
15.7% (10.6%, 20.8%) |
17.8% (12.6%, 23.0%) |
NA¶ |
NA¶ |
NA¶ |
| Major clinical response# |
| Responders |
3.0% |
12.8% |
14.8% |
NA¶ |
NA¶ |
NA¶ |
| Difference from placebo (95% CI)‡ |
|
9.7% (6.1%, 13.4%) |
11.8% (7.9%, 15.6%) |
|
|
|
| DAS28-CRP < 2.6Þ |
| Week 12 |
| Percentage of patients |
4.8% |
18.0% |
23.1% |
3.9% |
17.1% |
17.9% |
| Difference from placebo (95% CI)‡ |
|
13.3% (9.0%, 17.5%) |
18.3% (13.7%, 23.0%) |
|
13.3% (7.3%, 19.3%) |
14.1% (8.0%, 20.3%) |
| Week 24 |
| Percentage of patients |
10.1% |
27.8% |
34.1% |
7.2% |
24.9% |
28.8% |
| Difference from placebo (95% CI)‡ |
|
17.7% (12.5%, 23.0%) |
24.0% (18.5%, 29.5%) |
|
17.7% (10.5%, 24.9%) |
21.7% (14.3%, 29.1%) |
*Patients who were rescued or discontinued were considered non-responders for the analyses included in this table. In Study 1, at week 52, 196, 270, and 270 patients remained on placebo, KEVZARA 150 mg, and KEVZARA 200 mg respectively.
†DMARDs in Study 2 included MTX, sulfasalazine, leflunomide, and/or hydroxychloroquine.
‡Weighted estimate of the rate difference; CI=confidence interval
§Primary end point
¶NA=Not Applicable as Study 2 was a 24-week study.
#Major clinical response = ACR70 for at least 24 consecutive weeks during the 52-week period.
ÞPatients with DAS28-CRP <2.6 may have active joints. |
The percent ACR20 response by visit in Study 1 is shown in Figure 1. A similar response curve was observed in Study 2.
Figure 1: Percent of ACR20 Response by Visit for Study 1 (Adults with Moderately to Severely Active RA)
The results of the components of the ACR response criteria at Week 12 for Studies 1 and 2 are shown in Table 5.
Table 5: Mean Change from Baseline in Components of ACR Score at Week 12 (Prior to Rescue) in Adults with Moderately to Severely Active RA
| Component means (range/units) |
Study 1 |
Study 2 |
Placebo + MTX
(N=398) |
KEVZARA 150 mg + MTX
(N=400) |
KEVZARA 200 mg + MTX
(N=399) |
Placebo + DMARD(s)
(N=181) |
KEVZARA 150 mg + DMARD(s)
(N=181) |
KEVZARA 200 mg + DMARD(s)
(N=184) |
| Tender Joints (0-68) |
| Baseline |
26.80 |
27.21 |
26.50 |
29.42 |
27.66 |
29.55 |
| Week 12 |
16.25 |
12.88 |
11.78 |
19.18 |
13.38 |
13.10 |
| Change from baseline |
-10.51 |
-14.42 |
-14.94 |
-9.79 |
-14.11 |
-15.92 |
| Swollen Joints (0-66) |
| Baseline |
16.68 |
16.60 |
16.77 |
20.21 |
19.60 |
19.97 |
| Week 12 |
9.66 |
7.50 |
6.79 |
12.50 |
8.82 |
8.28 |
| Change from baseline |
-7.02 |
-9.03 |
-10.12 |
-7.25 |
-10.77 |
-10.89 |
| Pain VAS* (0-100 mm) |
| Baseline |
63.71 |
65.48 |
66.71 |
71.57 |
71.02 |
74.86 |
| Week 12 |
49.25 |
41.47 |
36.93 |
54.77 |
43.45 |
41.66 |
| Change from baseline |
-14.45 |
-23.73 |
-29.77 |
-16.12 |
-27.95 |
-32.77 |
| Physician global VAS* (0-100 mm) |
| Baseline |
62.86 |
63.43 |
63.59 |
68.39 |
68.10 |
67.76 |
| Week 12 |
39.25 |
31.32 |
28.47 |
43.73 |
33.65 |
30.18 |
| Change from baseline |
-23.63 |
-31.85 |
-34.84 |
-24.60 |
-34.92 |
-36.92 |
| Patient global VAS* (0-100 mm) |
| Baseline |
63.70 |
64.43 |
66.49 |
68.77 |
67.71 |
70.89 |
| Week 12 |
49.37 |
41.52 |
38.05 |
53.67 |
41.99 |
41.74 |
| Change from baseline |
-13.92 |
-22.88 |
-28.39 |
-15.05 |
-26.05 |
-28.83 |
| HAQ-DI (0-3) |
| Baseline |
1.61 |
1.63 |
1.69 |
1.80 |
1.72 |
1.82 |
| Week 12 |
1.34 |
1.15 |
1.13 |
1.49 |
1.23 |
1.33 |
| Change from baseline |
-0.27 |
-0.47 |
-0.57 |
-0.29 |
-0.50 |
-0.49 |
| CRP (mg/L) |
| Baseline |
20.46 |
22.57 |
22.23 |
26.02 |
23.60 |
30.77 |
| Week 12 |
19.61 |
9.24 |
3.30 |
21.72 |
9.21 |
4.58 |
| Change from baseline |
-0.58 |
-13.59 |
-18.31 |
-3.39 |
-14.24 |
-25.91 |
| *VAS=visual analog scale |
Radiographic Response
In Study 1, structural joint damage was assessed radiographically and expressed as the van der Heijde-modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) and its components, the erosion score and joint space narrowing score. Radiographs of hands and feet were obtained at baseline, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks and scored independently by at least two well-trained readers who were blinded to treatment group and visit number.
Both doses of KEVZARA + MTX were superior to placebo + MTX in the change from baseline in mTSS over 52 weeks (see Table 6). Less progression of both erosion and joint space narrowing scores over 52 weeks was reported in the KEVZARA + MTX treatment groups compared to the placebo + MTX group.
Treatment with KEVZARA + MTX was associated with significantly less radiographic progression of structural damage as compared with placebo + MTX. At Week 52, 55.6% of patients receiving KEVZARA 200 mg + MTX and 47.8% of patients receiving KEVZARA 150 mg + MTX had no progression of structural damage (as defined by a change in the Total Sharp Score of zero or less) compared with 38.7% of patients receiving placebo.
Table 6: Mean Radiographic Change from Baseline at Week 52 in Study 1 in Adults with Moderately to Severely Active RA*
|
Study 1 |
Placebo + MTX
(N=398) |
KEVZARA 150 mg + MTX
(N=400) |
KEVZARA 200 mg + MTX
(N=399) |
| Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) |
| Mean change |
2.78 |
0.90 |
0.25 |
| LS† mean difference (95% CI‡) |
|
-1.88
(-2.74, -1.01) |
-2.52
(-3.38, -1.66) |
| Erosion score |
| Mean change |
1.46 |
0.42 |
0.05 |
| LS† mean difference (95% CI‡) |
|
-1.03
(-1.53, -0.53) |
-1.40
(-1.90, -0.90) |
| Joint space narrowing score |
| Mean change |
1.32 |
0.47 |
0.20 |
| LS† mean difference (95% CI‡) |
|
-0.85
(-1.34, -0.35) |
-1.12
(-1.61, -0.63) |
*Week 52 analysis employs linear extrapolation method to impute missing or post-rescue data
†LS=least squares
‡CI=confidence interval |
Physical Function Response
In Studies 1 and 2, physical function and disability were assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI). Patients receiving KEVZARA 200 mg every two weeks + MTX/DMARD and KEVZARA 150 mg every two weeks + MTX/DMARD demonstrated greater improvement from baseline in physical function compared to placebo + MTX/DMARD at Week 16 and Week 12 in Studies 1 and 2, respectively (Table 7).
Table 7: Physical Function in Studies 1 and 2 in Adults with Moderately to Severely Active RA
|
Study 1 |
Study 2 |
| Week 16 |
Week 12 |
Placebo + MTX
(N=398) |
KEVZARA 150 mg + MTX
(N=400) |
KEVZARA 200 mg + MTX
(N=399) |
Placebo + DMARD(s)
(N=181) |
KEVZARA 150 mg + DMARD(s)
(N=181) |
KEVZARA 200 mg + DMARD(s)
(N=184) |
| HAQ-DI |
| Change from baseline |
-0.30 |
-0.54 |
-0.58 |
-0.29 |
-0.50 |
-0.49 |
| Difference from placebo (95% CI)* |
|
-0.24
(-0.31, -0.16) |
-0.26
(-0.34, -0.18) |
|
-0.20
(-0.32, -0.09) |
-0.21
(-0.33, -0.10) |
| % of patients with clinically meaningful improvement† |
42.5% |
53.8% |
57.4% |
35.9% |
47% |
51.1% |
*Difference in adjusted mean change from baseline compared with placebo + DMARD at Week 16 (Study 1) or Week 12 (Study 2) and 95% confidence interval for that difference.
†Change from baseline greater than 0.3 units |
Other Health Related Outcomes
General health status was assessed by the Short Form health survey (SF-36) in Studies 1 and 2. Patients receiving KEVZARA 200 mg every two weeks + MTX/DMARD demonstrated greater improvement from baseline compared to placebo + MTX/DMARD in the physical component summary (PCS) at Week 24, but there was no evidence of a difference between the treatment groups in the mental component summary (MCS) at Week 24. Patients receiving KEVZARA 200 mg + MTX/DMARD reported greater improvement relative to placebo in the domains of Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health Perception, Vitality, Social Functioning and Mental Health, but not in the Role Emotional domain.
Polymyalgia Rheumatica
The efficacy and safety of KEVZARA in PMR were assessed in a randomized, double- blind, placebo-controlled, 52-week, multicenter study (Study 3) (NCT03600818) in adults with PMR diagnosed according to American College of Rheumatology/European Union League against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria. Patients had at least one episode of unequivocal PMR flare while attempting to taper corticosteroids.
In Study 3, patients with active PMR were randomized to receive KEVZARA 200 mg every two weeks with a pre-defined 14-week taper of prednisone (n= 60) or placebo every two weeks with a pre-defined 52-week taper of prednisone (n=58). One participant was randomized but not treated in the KEVZARA 200 mg arm. Patients experiencing a disease flare or unable to adhere to the assigned prednisone tapering schedule could receive corticosteroids as rescue therapy.
The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with sustained remission at Week 52. Sustained remission was defined as achievement of disease remission no later than Week 12, absence of disease flare from Week 12 through Week 52, sustained reduction of CRP (to <10 mg/L) from Week 12 through Week 52, and successful adherence to prednisone taper from Week 12 through Week 52. An additional endpoint was total cumulative corticosteroid dose over 52 weeks.
Clinical Response
The proportion of participants achieving sustained remission at Week 52 was higher in the KEVZARA arm compared to the placebo arm; this difference was statistically significant. At 52 weeks, a higher proportion of patients in the KEVZARA arm achieved each component of the sustained remission endpoint compared to the placebo. An analysis was conducted that removed all acute phase reactants (CRP and ESR) criteria from the definition of the sustained remission, given sarilumab’s direct impact on acute phase reactants. The results of this analysis were consistent with the primary analysis (see Table 8).
Table 8 : Clinical Response in Placebo-Controlled Study 3 in Adults with Active PMR
|
Placebo
(N=58) |
KEVZARA
(N=60) |
| Sustained remission at Week 52 |
| Number of patients with sustained remission, n (%) |
6 (10.3) |
17 (28.3) |
| Proportion difference (95% CI) vs. placebo |
|
18.0 (4.2, 31.8; p=0.0193) |
| Components of sustained remission at Week 52 |
| Absence of signs and symptoms and CRP < 10 mg/L (disease remission*) no later than Week 12, n (%) |
22 (37.9) |
28 (46.7) |
| Absence of disease flare† from Week 12 through Week 52, n (%) |
19 (32.8) |
33 (55.0) |
| Sustained reduction of CRP (<10 mg/L) from Week 12 through Week 52, n (%) |
26 (44.8) |
40 (66.7) |
| Successful adherence to prednisone taper from Week 12 through Week 52, n (%) |
14 (24.1) |
30 (50.0) |
| Sensitivity analysis removing acute phase reactants (CRP and ESR) from sustained remission at Week 52 |
| Number of patients with sustained remission, n (%) |
8 (13.8) |
19 (31.7) |
| Proportion difference (95% CI) for sarilumab vs. placebo |
|
17.9 (3.1, 32.6) |
*Disease remission is defined as the resolution of signs and symptoms of PMR, and normalization of CRP (<10 mg/L).
†Flare is defined as recurrence of signs and symptoms attributable to active PMR requiring an increase in corticosteroid dose, or elevation of ESR attributable to active PMR plus an increase in corticosteroid dose. |
Effect On Concomitant Corticosteroid Use
The total actual cumulative corticosteroid dose included all corticosteroids taken during the study (i.e., prednisone taper regimen per protocol, add-on prednisone prior to Week 12, corticosteroid use due to rescue, or corticosteroid use during the treatment period to manage an adverse reaction not related to PMR). The total actual cumulative prednisone equivalent corticosteroid dose was lower in the KEVZARA arm (mean [SD] 1039.5 [612.2] mg and median 777 mg) relative to the placebo arm (mean [SD] 2235.8 [839.4] mg and median 2044 mg).
Polyarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (pJIA)
Supportive efficacy and safety data were provided from Study 4, which was a multicenter, open-label, two-phase study in patients aged 2 to 17 years of age with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA) diagnosed according to American College Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria who had an inadequate response to current therapy. This study was divided into a dose range finding portion and a confirmatory portion. Three doses were investigated in the 12-week core treatment phase of the dose range finding portion. Following the dose selection, patients were enrolled to receive the recommended dose [3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (q2w) in 42 patients weighing ≥30 kg (Group A) and 4 mg/kg q2w in 31 patients weighing ≥10 kg and <30 kg (Group B)]. A total of 101 patients were treated, including 73 patients who received the recommended dose regimen from baseline and 20 patients who had their dose switched to the recommended dose during the study. Of the 73 patients who received the recommended dose throughout treatment, baseline mean disease duration was 2.48 years and a JADAS-27 score of 22.73. At baseline, 84.9% of patients had received at least one conventional DMARD (mainly methotrexate), 13.7% received systemic glucocorticoids, and 19.2% had prior treatment with biological DMARDs (mainly TNF antagonists). The patients treated had subtypes of JIA that, at disease onset, included rheumatoid factor positive (17.8%), negative polyarticular JIA (65.8%), or extended oligoarticular JIA (16.4%).
Use of KEVZARA in pediatric patients with pJIA is supported by evidence from adequate and well-controlled studies of KEVZARA in adults with RA, pharmacokinetic data from adult patients with RA, and pharmacokinetic (PK) comparability from Study 4 [see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY].