Clinical Pharmacology for Eligard
Mechanism Of Action
Leuprolide acetate, a gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist, acts as an inhibitor of gonadotropin secretion when given continuously in therapeutic doses. Animal and human studies indicate that after an initial stimulation, chronic administration of leuprolide acetate results in suppression of testicular and ovarian steroidogenesis. This effect is reversible upon discontinuation of drug therapy.
Pharmacodynamics
Following initial administration, ELIGARD causes an initial increase in serum luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels with subsequent increases in serum levels of testosterone. Administration of ELIGARD leads to sustained suppression of pituitary gonadotropins, and serum levels of testosterone consequently fall into the range normally seen in surgically castrated men approximately 21 days after initiation of therapy. Continuation of therapy with leuprolide acetate in patients with prostate cancer maintained testosterone below the castrate level for up to five years.
Following the first dose of ELIGARD®, mean serum testosterone concentrations transiently increased, then fell to below castrate threshold (≤ 50 ng/dL) within three weeks, and generally remained below castrate threshold levels throughout treatment for all ELIGARD® concentrations. Mean serum testosterone concentrations fell to ≤ 20 ng/dL within five weeks for all ELIGARD® concentrations.
Pharmacokinetics
Absorption
ELIGARD® 7.5 mg
Following a single injection of ELIGARD® 7.5 mg for 1-month administration in patients, the mean peak plasma concentration was 25.3 ng/mL (Cmax) at 5 hours;at the end of the 4 week dosing interval the mean concentration declined to 0.42 ng/mL.
ELIGARD® 22.5 mg
Following a single injection of ELIGARD® 22.5 mg for 3-month administration in patients, the mean peak plasma concentration was 127 ng/mL (Cmax) at 5 hours; at the end of the 12 week dosing interval the mean concentration declined to 0.34 ng/mL .
ELIGARD® 30 mg
Following a single injection of ELIGARD® 30 mg for 4-month administration in patients, the mean peak plasma concentration was 150 ng/mL (Cmax) at 3.3 hours; at the end of the 16 week dosing interval the mean concentration declined to 0.1 ng/mL.
ELIGARD® 45 mg
Following a single injection of ELIGARD® 45 mg for 6-month administration in patients, the mean peak plasma concentration was 82 ng/mL at 4.5 hours (Cmax); at the end of the 24 week dosing interval the mean concentration declined to 0.2 ng/mL.
There was no evidence of significant accumulation during repeated dosing.
Distribution
The mean steady-state volume of distribution of leuprolide following intravenous bolus administration to healthy male volunteers was 27 L. In vitro binding to human plasma proteins ranged from 43% to 49%.
Elimination
After the initial increase following each subcutaneous injection, serum concentration range was 0.1 – 2.00 ng/mL.
In healthy male volunteers, a 1-mg bolus of leuprolide administered intravenously revealed that the mean systemic clearance was 8.34 L/h, with a terminal elimination half-life of approximately 3 hours based on a two compartment model.
Metabolism
No drug metabolism study was conducted with ELIGARD®. Upon administration with different leuprolide acetate formulations, the major metabolite of leuprolide acetate is a pentapeptide (M- 1) metabolite.
Excretion
No drug excretion study was conducted with ELIGARD®.
Specific Populations
Geriatrics [see Use In Specific Populations]
Race
In patients studied, mean serum leuprolide concentrations were similar regardless of race. Refer to Table 7 for distribution of study patients by race.
Table 7. Race Characterization of ELIGARD® Study Patients
| Race |
ELIGARD®
7.5 mg |
ELIGARD®
22.5 mg |
ELIGARD®
30 mg |
ELIGARD®
45 mg |
| White |
26 |
19 |
18 |
17 |
| Black |
- |
4 |
4 |
7 |
| Hispanic |
2 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
Renal And Hepatic Insufficiency
The pharmacokinetics of ELIGARD® in hepatically and renally impaired patients have not been determined.
Clinical Studies
One open-label, multicenter study was conducted with each ELIGARD® formulation (7.5 mg, 22.5 mg, 30 mg, and 45 mg) in patients with Jewett stage A though D prostate cancer who were treated with at least a single injection of study drug (Table 8). The efficacy outcome measure was medical castration rate, defined as achieving and maintaining serum testosterone suppression to ≤ 50 ng/dL (Figures 1-4).
During the AGL9904 study using ELIGARD® 7.5 mg, once testosterone suppression below 50 ng/dL was achieved, no patients (0%) demonstrated breakthrough (concentration > 50 ng/dL) at any time in the study.
During the AGL9909 study using ELIGARD® 22.5 mg, once testosterone suppression below 50 ng/dL was achieved, one patient (< 1%) demonstrated breakthrough following the initial injection; that patient remained below 50 ng/dL following the second injection.
During the AGL0001 study using ELIGARD® 30 mg, once testosterone suppression below 50 ng/dL was achieved, three patients (3%) demonstrated breakthrough. In the first of these patients, a single serum testosterone concentration of 53 ng/dL was reported on the day after the second injection. In this patient, suppression below 50 ng/dL was reported for all other time points. In the second patient, a serum testosterone concentration of 66 ng/dL was reported immediately prior to the second injection. This rose to a maximum concentration of 147 ng/dL on the second day after the second injection. In this patient, suppression below 50 ng/dL was again reached on the seventh day after the second injection and was maintained thereafter. In the final patient, serum testosterone concentrations > 50 ng/dL were reported at 2 and at 8 hours after the second injection. Serum testosterone concentration rose to a maximum of 110 ng/dL on the third day after the second injection. In this patient, suppression below 50 ng/dL was again reached eighteen days after the second injection and was maintained until the final day of the study, when a single serum testosterone concentration of 55 ng/dL was reported.
During the AGL0205 study using ELIGARD® 45 mg, once testosterone suppression below 50 ng/dL was achieved, one patient (<1%) demonstrated breakthrough. This patient reached castrate suppression below 50 ng/dL at Day 21 and remained suppressed until Day 308 when his testosterone level rose to 112 ng/dL. At Month 12 (Day 336), his testosterone was 210 ng/dL.
Table 8. Summary of ELIGARD® Clinical Studies
| ELIGARD® |
7.5 mg |
22.5 mg |
30 mg |
45 mg |
| Study number |
AGL9904 |
AGL9909 |
AGL0001 |
AGL0205 |
| Total number of patients |
120 (117 completed) |
1172 (111 completed3) |
90 (82 completed4) |
111 (103 completed5) |
| Jewett stages |
Stage A |
- |
2 |
2 |
5 |
| Stage B |
- |
19 |
38 |
43 |
| Stage C |
89 |
60 |
16 |
19 |
| Stage D |
31 |
36 |
34 |
44 |
| Treatment |
6 monthly injections |
1 injection (4 patients) |
1 injection (5 patients) |
1 injection (5 patients) |
| 2 injections, one every three months (113 patients) |
2 injections, oneevery four months (85 patients) |
2 injections,one everysix months (106 patients) |
| Duration of therapy |
6 months |
6 months |
8 months |
12 months |
| Mean testosterone concentration (ng/dL) |
Baseline |
361.3 |
367.1 |
385.5 |
367.7 |
| Day 2 |
574.6 (Day 3) |
588.0 |
610.0 |
588.6 |
| Day 14 |
Below Baseline(Day 10) |
Below Baseline |
Below Baseline |
Below Baseline |
| Day 28 |
21.8 |
27.7 (Day 21) |
17.2 |
16.7 |
| Conclusion |
6.1 |
10.1 |
12.4 |
12.6 |
| Number of patients with testosterone ≤ 50ng/dL |
Day 28 |
112 of 119(94.1%) |
115 of 116(99%) |
85 of 89 (96%) |
108 of 109 (99.1%) |
| Day 35 |
- |
116 (100%) |
- |
- |
| Day 42 |
118 (100%) |
- |
89 (100%) |
- |
| Conclusion |
1171 (100%) |
111 (100%) |
81 (99%) |
102 (99%) |
| Number of patients with testosterone≤ 20 ng/dL |
Day 28 |
90 of 119 (76%) |
94 of 116 (81%) |
60 of 89 (67%) |
87 of 109 (80%) |
1. Two patients withdrew for reasons unrelated to drug.
2. One patient received less than a full dose at Baseline, never attained castration, and was withdrawn at Day 73 and given an alternate treatment.
3. All non-evaluable patients who attained castration by Day 28 maintained castration at each time point up toand including the time of withdrawal.
4. One patient withdrew on Day 14. All 7 non-evaluable patients who had achieved castration by Day 28 maintained castration at each time point, up to and including the time of withdrawal.
5. Two patients were withdrawn prior to the Month 1 blood draw. One patient did not achieve castration and was withdrawn on Day 85. All 5 non-evaluable patients who attained castration by Day 28, maintainedcastration at each time point up to and including the time of withdrawal. |
Figure 1. ELIGARD® 7.5 mg Mean Serum Testosterone Concentrations (n=117)
Figure 2. ELIGARD® 22.5 mg Mean Serum Testosterone Concentrations (n=111)
Figure 3. ELIGARD® 30 mg Mean Serum Testosterone Concentrations (n=90)
Figure 4. ELIGARD® 45 mg Mean Serum Testosterone Concentrations (n=103)
Serum PSA decreased in all patients in all studies whose Baseline values were elevated above the normal limit. Refer to Table 9 for a summary of the effectiveness of ELIGARD® in reducing serum PSA values.
Table 9. Effect of ELIGARD® on Patient Serum PSA Values
| ELIGARD® |
7.5 mg |
22.5 mg |
30 mg |
45 mg |
| Mean PSA reduction at study conclusion |
94% |
98% |
86% |
97% |
| Patients with normal PSA at study conclusion* |
94% |
91% |
93% |
95% |
| *Among patients who presented with elevated levels at Baseline |
Other secondary efficacy endpoints evaluated included WHO performance status, bone pain, urinary pain and urinary signs and symptoms. Refer to Table 10 for a summary of these endpoints.
Table 10. Secondary Efficacy Endpoints
| ELIGARD® |
7.5 mg |
22.5 mg |
30 mg |
45 mg |
| Baseline |
WHO Status = 01 |
88% |
94% |
90% |
90% |
| WHO Status = 12 |
11% |
6% |
10% |
7% |
| WHO Status = 23 |
- |
- |
- |
3% |
| Mean bone pain4 (range) |
1.22 (1-9) |
1.20 (1-9) |
1.20 (1-7) |
1.38 (1-7) |
| Mean urinary pain (range) |
1.12 (1-5) |
1.02 (1-2) |
1.01 (1-2) |
1.22 (1-8) |
| Mean urinary signsand symptoms (range) |
Low |
1.09 (1-4) |
Low |
Low |
| Number of patients with prostate abnormalities |
102 (85%) |
96 (82%) |
66 (73%) |
89 (80%) |
|
Month 6 |
Month 6 |
Month 8 |
Month 12 |
| Follow-up |
WHO status = 0 |
Unchanged |
96% |
87% |
94% |
| WHO status = 1 |
Unchanged |
4% |
12% |
5% |
| WHO status = 2 |
- |
- |
1% |
1% |
| Mean bone pain (range) |
1.26 (1-7) |
1.22 (1-5) |
1.19 (1-8) |
1.31 (1-8) |
| Mean urinary pain (range) |
1.07 (1-8) |
1.10 (1-8) |
1.00 (1-1) |
1.07 (1-5) |
| Mean urinary signsand symptoms (range) |
Modestly decreased |
1.18 (1-7) |
Modestly decreased |
Modestly decreased |
| Number of patients with prostate abnormalities |
77 (64%) |
76 (65%) |
54 (60%) |
60 (58%) |
1. WHO status = 0 classified as “fully active.”
2. WHO status = 1 classified as “restricted in strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of alight or sedentary nature.”
3. WHO status = 2 classified as “ambulatory but unable to carry out work activities.”
4. Pain score scale: 1 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain possible). |