Clinical Pharmacology for Delstrigo
Mechanism Of Action
DELSTRIGO is a fixed-dose combination of the antiretroviral drugs doravirine, lamivudine, and TDF [see Microbiology].
Pharmacodynamics
In a Phase 2 trial evaluating doravirine over a dose range of 0.25 to 2 times the recommended dose of doravirine in DELSTRIGO (in combination with FTC/TDF) in participants living with HIV with no antiretroviral treatment history, no exposure-response relationship for efficacy was identified for doravirine.
Cardiac Electrophysiology
At a doravirine dose of 1200 mg, which provides approximately 4 times the peak concentration observed following the recommended dose of doravirine in DELSTRIGO does not prolong the QT interval to any clinically relevant extent.
Pharmacokinetics
Single-dose administration of one DELSTRIGO tablet to healthy participants provided comparable exposures of doravirine, lamivudine, and tenofovir to administration of doravirine tablets (100 mg) plus lamivudine tablets (300 mg) plus TDF tablets (300 mg). Doravirine pharmacokinetics are similar in healthy participants and participants living with HIV. Pharmacokinetic properties of the components of DELSTRIGO are provided in Table 7.
Table 7: Pharmacokinetic Properties of the Components of DELSTRIGO
| Parameter |
Doravirine |
Lamivudine |
Tenofovir |
| General |
| Steady State Exposure* |
| AUC0-24 (mcg•h/mL) |
16.1 (29)† |
8.87 ± 1.83‡ |
2.29 ± 0.69§ |
| Cmax(mcg/mL) |
0.962 (19)† |
2.04 ± 0.54‡ |
0.30 ± 0.09§ |
| C24 (mcg/mL) |
0.396 (63)† |
NA |
NA |
| Absorption |
| Absolute Bioavailability |
64% |
86% |
25% |
| Tmax (h) |
2 |
NA |
1 |
| Effect of Food¶ |
| AUC Ratio |
1.10 (1.01, 1.20) |
0.93 (0.84, 1.03) |
1.27 (1.17, 1.37) |
| Cmax Ratio |
0.95 (0.80, 1.12) |
0.81 (0.65, 1.01) |
0.88 (0.74, 1.04) |
| C24 Ratio |
1.26 (1.13, 1.41) |
NA |
NA |
| Distribution |
| Vdss# |
60.5 L |
1.3 L/kg |
1.3 L/kg |
| Plasma Protein Binding |
76% |
< 36% |
<0.7% |
| Elimination |
| t½ (h) |
15 |
5-7 |
17 |
| CL/F (mL/ min)* |
106 (35.2) |
398.5 ± 69.1 |
1,043.7 ± 115.4 |
| CLrenal (mL/ min)* |
9.3 (18.6) |
199.7 ± 56.9 |
243.5 ± 33.3 |
| Metabolism |
| Primary Pathway(s) |
CYP3A |
Minor |
No CYP Metabolism |
| Excretion |
| Major route of elimination |
Metabolism |
Glomerular filtration and active tubular secretion |
Glomerular filtration and active tubular secretion |
| Urine (unchanged) |
6% |
71% |
70-80% |
| Biliary/Fecal (unchanged) |
Minor |
NA |
NA |
*Presented as geometric mean (%CV: geometric coefficient of variation) or mean ± SD.
†Doravirine 100 mg once daily to participants living with HIV.
‡Lamivudine 300 mg once daily for 7 days to 60 healthy participants.
§Single 300 mg dose of TDF to participants living with HIV in the fasted state.
¶Geometric mean ratio [high-fat meal/fasting] and (90% confidence interval) for PK parameters. High fat meal is approximately 1000 kcal, 50% fat. The effect of food is not clinically relevant.
#Based on IV dose.
Abbreviations: NA=not available; AUC=area under the time concentration curve; Cmax=maximum concentration; C24=concentration at 24 hours; Tmax=time to Cmax; Vdss=apparent volume of distribution at steady state; t½=elimination half-life; CL/F=apparent clearance; CLrenal = renal clearance |
Specific Populations
In adults, no clinically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of certain DELSTRIGO components were observed based on age ≥65 years (for doravirine), sex (for doravirine, lamivudine, tenofovir), and race/ethnicity (for doravirine, lamivudine). The effects of age (≥65 years) on the pharmacokinetics of lamivudine and tenofovir, and the effect of race on the pharmacokinetics of tenofovir are unknown.
Patients With Renal Impairment
Doravirine
No clinically significant difference in the pharmacokinetics of doravirine were observed in participants with mild to severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance (CLcr) >15 mL/min, estimated by Cockcroft-Gault). Doravirine has not been studied in patients with end-stage renal disease or in patients undergoing dialysis.
Lamivudine
The AUC∞, Cmax, and half-life of lamivudine increased and CL/F decreased to a clinically significant extent with diminishing renal function (CLcr 111 to < 10 mL/min).
TDF
A clinically significant increase in the Cmax and AUC of tenofovir was observed in participants with CLcr < 50 mL/min or with end stage renal disease requiring dialysis [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS and Use In Specific Populations].
Patients With Hepatic Impairment
Doravirine
No clinically significant difference in the pharmacokinetics of doravirine was observed in participants with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score B) compared to participants without hepatic impairment. Doravirine has not been studied in participants with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score C).
Lamivudine
No clinically significant differences in lamivudine pharmacokinetics were observed with diminishing hepatic function. Safety and efficacy of lamivudine have not been established in the presence of decompensated liver disease.
TDF
No clinically significant differences in tenofovir pharmacokinetics were observed between participants with any degree of hepatic impairment and unimpaired participants.
Pediatric Patients
Mean doravirine exposures were similar in 54 pediatric participants aged 12 to less than 18 years and weighing at least 35 kg who received doravirine or DELSTRIGO in IMPAACT 2014 (Protocol 027) relative to adults following administration of doravirine or DELSTRIGO. Exposures of lamivudine and tenofovir in pediatric participants following the administration of DELSTRIGO were similar to those in adults following administration of lamivudine and tenofovir (Table 8). For pediatric participants weighing ≥ 35 kg and < 45 kg who receive doravirine 100 mg or DELSTRIGO, the population pharmacokinetic model-predicted mean C24 of doravirine was comparable to that achieved in adults, whereas mean AUC0-24 and Cmax of doravirine were 25% and 36% higher than adult values, respectively. However, the predicted AUC0-24 and Cmax increases are not considered clinically significant.
Table 8: Steady State Pharmacokinetics for Doravirine, Lamivudine, and Tenofovir Following Administration of Doravirine or DELSTRIGO in Pediatric Participants Living with HIVAged 12 to Less than 18 Years and Weighing at Least 35 kg
| Parameter* |
Doravirine† |
Lamivudine‡ |
Tenofovir‡ |
| AUC0-24(mcg•h/mL) |
16.4 (24) |
11.3 (28) |
2.55 (14) |
| Cmax(mcg/mL) |
1.03 (16) |
2.1 (24) |
0.293 (37) |
| C24(mcg/mL) |
0.379 (42) |
NA |
NA |
*Presented as geometric mean (%CV: geometric coefficient of variation)
†From population PK analysis (n=53 weighing ≥45 kg, n=1 weighing ≥35 kg to <45 kg)
‡From intensive PK analysis (n=10)
Abbreviations: NA=not applicable; AUC=area under the time concentration curve; Cmax=maximum concentration; C24=concentration at 24 hours |
Drug Interaction Studies
DELSTRIGO is a complete regimen for the treatment of HIV-1 infection; therefore, DELSTRIGO is not recommended to be administered with other HIV-1 antiretroviral medications. Information regarding potential drug-drug interactions with other antiretroviral medications is not provided.
The drug interaction trials described were conducted with doravirine, lamivudine and/or TDF, as single entities; no drug interaction trials have been conducted using the combination of doravirine, lamivudine, and TDF. No clinically relevant drug interactions were observed between doravirine, lamivudine, and TDF.
Doravirine
Doravirine is primarily metabolized by CYP3A, and drugs that induce or inhibit CYP3A may affect the clearance of doravirine. Co-administration of doravirine and drugs that induce CYP3A may result in decreased plasma concentrations of doravirine. Co-administration of doravirine and drugs that inhibit CYP3A may result in increased plasma concentrations of doravirine.
Doravirine is not likely to have a clinically relevant effect on the exposure of medicinal products metabolized by CYP enzymes. Doravirine did not inhibit major drug metabolizing enzymes in vitro, including CYPs 1A2, 2B6, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, 3A4, and UGT1A1 and is not likely to be an inducer of CYP1A2, 2B6, or 3A4. Based on in vitro assays, doravirine is not likely to be an inhibitor of OATP1B1, OATP1B3, P-glycoprotein, BSEP, OAT1, OAT3, OCT2, MATE1, and MATE2K. Drug interaction studies were performed with doravirine and other drugs likely to be co-administered or commonly used as probes for pharmacokinetic interactions. The effects of co-administration with other drugs on the exposure (Cmax, AUC, and C24) of doravirine are summarized in Table 9. A single doravirine 100 mg dose was administered in these studies unless otherwise noted.
Table 9: Drug Interactions: Changes in Pharmacokinetic Parameter Values of Doravirine in thePresence of Co-administered Drug
| Co-administered Drug |
Regimen of Coadministered Drug |
N |
Geometric Mean Ratio (90% CI) of Doravirine Pharmacokinetics with/without Co-administered Drug (No Effect=1.00) |
| AUC* |
Cmax |
C24 |
| Azole Antifungal Agents |
| ketoconazole† |
400 mg QD |
10 |
3.06
(2.85, 3.29) |
1.25
(1.05, 1.49) |
2.75
(2.54, 2.98) |
| Antimycobacterials |
| rifampin |
600 mg QD |
10 |
0.12
(0.10, 0.15) |
0.43
(0.35, 0.52) |
0.03
(0.02, 0.04) |
| rifabutin |
300 mg QD |
12 |
0.50
(0.45, 0.55) |
0.99
(0.85, 1.15) |
0.32
(0.28, 0.35) |
| 300 mg QD‡ |
15 |
1.03
(0.94, 1.14) |
0.97
(0.87, 1.08) |
0.98
(0.88, 1.10) |
| HIV Antiviral Agents |
| ritonavir†§ |
100 mg BID |
8 |
3.54
(3.04, 4.11) |
1.31
(1.17, 1.46) |
2.91
(2.33, 3.62) |
| efavirenz |
600 mg QD¶ |
17 |
0.38
(0.33, 0.45) |
0.65
(0.58, 0.73) |
0.15
(0.10, 0.23) |
| 600 mg QD# |
17 |
0.68
(0.58, 0.80) |
0.86
(0.77, 0.97) |
0.50
(0.39, 0.64) |
CI = confidence interval; QD = once daily; BID = twice daily
*AUC0-∞ for single-dose, AUC0-24 for once daily.
†Changes in doravirine pharmacokinetic values are not clinically relevant.
‡Doravirine 100 mg BID resulted in similar pharmacokinetic values when compared to 100 mg QD without rifabutin.
§A single doravirine 50 mg dose (0.5 times the recommended approved dose) was administered.
¶The first day following the cessation of efavirenz therapy and initiation of doravirine 100 mg QD.
#14 days following the cessation of efavirenz therapy and initiation of doravirine 100 mg QD. |
Based on drug interaction studies conducted with doravirine, no clinically significant drug interactions have been observed following the co-administration of doravirine and the following drugs: dolutegravir, TDF, lamivudine, elbasvir and grazoprevir, ledipasvir and sofosbuvir, ketoconazole, ritonavir, aluminum hydroxide/magnesium hydroxide/simethicone containing antacid, pantoprazole, atorvastatin, an oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel, metformin, methadone, and midazolam.
Lamivudine
Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole
Co-administration of TMP/SMX with lamivudine resulted in an increase of 43% ±23% (mean ±SD) in lamivudine AUC∞, a decrease of 29% ±13% in lamivudine oral clearance, and a decrease of 30% ±36% in lamivudine renal clearance. The pharmacokinetic properties of TMP and SMX were not altered by co-administration with lamivudine.
Sorbitol (Excipient)
Co-administration of lamivudine with a single dose of 3.2 grams, 10.2 grams, or 13.4 grams of sorbitol resulted in dose-dependent decreases of 14%, 32%, and 36% in the AUC∞; and 28%, 52%, and 55% in the Cmax of lamivudine, respectively.
TDF
No clinically significant changes in exposure were observed for tenofovir when co-administered with tacrolimus or entecavir.
No clinically significant changes in exposure were observed for the following drugs when co-administered with tenofovir: tacrolimus, entecavir, methadone, or ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate.
Microbiology
Mechanism Of Action
Doravirine
Doravirine is a pyridinone non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor of HIV-1 and inhibits HIV-1 replication by non-competitive inhibition of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT). The inhibitory concentration at 50% (IC50) of doravirine for RNA-dependent DNA polymerization of recombinant wild-type HIV-1 RT in a biochemical assay was 12.2±2.0 nM (n=3). Doravirine does not inhibit the human cellular DNA polymerasesα, β, and mitochondrial DNA polymerase γ.
Lamivudine
Lamivudine is a synthetic nucleoside analogue. Intracellularly, lamivudine is phosphorylated to its active 5´-triphosphate metabolite, lamivudine triphosphate (3TC-TP). The principal mode of action of 3TC-TP is inhibition of RT via DNA chain termination after incorporation of the nucleotide analogue. Lamivudine triphosphate (3TC-TP) is a weak inhibitor of mammalian DNA polymerasesα, β, and mitochondrial DNA polymerase γ.
TDF
TDF is an acyclic nucleoside phosphonate diester analog of adenosine monophosphate. TDF requires initial diester hydrolysis for conversion to tenofovir and subsequent phosphorylations by cellular enzymes to form tenofovir diphosphate. Tenofovir diphosphate inhibits the activity of HIV-1 RT by competing with the natural substrate deoxyadenosine 5'-triphosphate and, after incorporation into DNA, by DNA chain termination. Tenofovir diphosphate is a weak inhibitor of mammalian DNA polymerasesα, β, and mitochondrial DNA polymerase γ.
Antiviral Activity In Cell Culture
Doravirine
Doravirine exhibited an EC50 value of 12.0±4.4 nM against wild-type laboratory strains of HIV-1 when tested in the presence of 100% normal human serum (NHS) using MT4-GFP reporter cells and a median EC50 value for HIV-1 subtype B primary isolates (n=118) of 4.1 nM (range: 1.0 nM-16.0 nM). Doravirine demonstrated antiviral activity against a broad panel of primary HIV-1 isolates (A, A1, AE, AG, B, BF, C, D, G, H) with EC50 values ranging from 1.2 nM to 10.0 nM. The antiviral activity of doravirine was not antagonistic when combined with lamivudine and TDF.
Lamivudine
The antiviral activity of lamivudine against HIV-1 was assessed in a number of cell lines including monocytes and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) using standard susceptibility assays. EC50 values were in the range of 3 to 15,000 nM (1,000 nM = 230 ng per mL). The median EC50 values of lamivudine were 60 nM (range: 20 to 70 nM), 35 nM (range: 30 to 40 nM), 30 nM (range: 20 to 90 nM), 20 nM (range: 3 to 40 nM), 30 nM (range: 1 to 60 nM), 30 nM (range: 20 to 70 nM), 30 nM (range: 3 to 70 nM), and 30 nM (range: 20 to 90 nM) against HIV-1 clades A-G and group O viruses (n = 3 except n = 2 for clade B) respectively. Ribavirin (50,000 nM) used in the treatment of chronic HCV infection decreased the anti-HIV-1 activity of lamivudine by 3.5-fold in MT-4 cells.
TDF
The antiviral activity of tenofovir against laboratory and clinical isolates of HIV-1 was assessed in T lymphoblastoid cell lines, primary monocyte/macrophage cells and peripheral blood lymphocytes. The EC50 values for tenofovir were in the range of 40-8,500 nM. Tenofovir displayed antiviral activity in cell culture against HIV-1 clades A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and O (EC50 values ranged from 500-2,200 nM).
Resistance
In Cell Culture
Doravirine
Doravirine-resistant strains were selected in cell culture starting from wild-type HIV-1 of different origins and subtypes, as well as NNRTI-resistant HIV-1. Observed emergent amino acid substitutions in RT included: V106A, V106I, V106M, V108I, H221Y, F227C, F227I, F227L, F227V, M230I, L234I, P236L, and Y318F. The V106A, V106M, V108I, H221Y, F227C, M230I, P236L, and Y318F substitutions conferred 3.4-fold to 70-fold reductions in susceptibility to doravirine. Y318F in combination with V106A, V106M, V108I, or F227C conferred greater decreases in susceptibility to doravirine than Y318F alone, which conferred a 10-fold reduction in susceptibility to doravirine.
Lamivudine
Lamivudine-resistant variants of HIV-1 have been selected in cell culture and in participants treated with lamivudine. Genotypic analysis showed that substitutions M184I or V cause resistance to lamivudine.
TDF
HIV-1 isolates selected by tenofovir in cell culture expressed a K65R substitution in HIV-1 RT and showed a 2–4 -fold reduction in susceptibility to tenofovir. In addition, a K70E substitution in HIV-1 RT has been selected by tenofovir and results in low-level reduced susceptibility to abacavir, emtricitabine, lamivudine, and tenofovir.
In Clinical Trials
Clinical Trial Results In Adults With No Antiretroviral Treatment History
Doravirine
In the doravirine treatment arm of the DRIVE-AHEAD trial (n=364) through 96 weeks, 10 participants showed the emergence of doravirine resistance-associated substitutions among 24 (42%) participants in the resistance analysis subset (participants with HIV-1 RNA greater than 400 copies per mL at virologic failure or early study discontinuation and having post-baseline resistance samples). Emergent doravirine resistance-associated substitutions in RT included one or more of the following: V90V/G, A98G, V106A, V106I, V106M/T, V108I, E138G, Y188L, H221Y, P225H, P225L, P225P/S, F227C, F227C/R, Y318Y/F, and Y318Y/S. Six of the 10 participants with emergent doravirine resistance-associated substitutions showed doravirine phenotypic resistance and all of them had a greater than 100-fold reduction in doravirine susceptibility (range >103 to >211). The other 4 virologic failures who had only amino acid mixtures of NNRTI resistance substitutions showed doravirine phenotypic fold-changes of less than 2-fold.
In the EFV/FTC/TDF treatment arm of the DRIVE-AHEAD trial (n=364) through Week 96, 15 participants showed the emergence of efavirenz resistance-associated substitutions among 25 (60%) participants in the resistance analysis subset.
Lamivudine And TDF
In a pooled analysis of antiretroviral-naïve participants who received doravirine, lamivudine, and TDF, genotyping was performed on plasma HIV-1 isolates from all participants with HIV-1 RNA greater than 400 copies per mL at confirmed virologic failure or at time of early study drug discontinuation. Genotypic resistance developed in 8 evaluable participants who received DOR/3TC/TDF through Week 96. The resistance–associated substitutions that emerged were RT M41L (n=1), A62A/V (n=1), K65R (n=2), T69T/A (n=1), V75V/I (n=1), and M184V (n=5). In comparison, genotypic resistance to emtricitabine or tenofovir developed in 5 evaluable participants who received EFV/FTC/TDF in DRIVEÂAHEAD; emergent resistance-associated substitutions were RT K65R (n=1), D67G/K70E (n=1), L74V/V75M/V118I (n=1), M184I or V (n=5), and K219K/E (n=1).
Clinical Trial Results In Virologically-Suppressed Adults
In the DRIVE-SHIFT clinical trial [see Clinical Studies], there were 6 participants in the immediate switch group (n=447) and 2 participants in the delayed switch group (n=209) who met the protocol-defined virologic failure criteria (confirmed HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL). Two of the 6 virologic failure participants in the immediate switch group had available resistance data and neither developed detectable genotypic or phenotypic resistance to doravirine, lamivudine, or tenofovir during treatment with DELSTRIGO. One of the two virologic failure participants in the delayed switch group who had available resistance data developed the RT M184M/I substitution and phenotypic resistance to emtricitabine and lamivudine during treatment with their baseline regimen.
Cross-Resistance
No significant cross-resistance has been demonstrated between doravirine-resistant HIV-1 variants and lamivudine/emtricitabine or tenofovir or between lamivudine or tenofovir-resistant variants and doravirine.
Doravirine
Cross-resistance has been observed among NNRTIs. Treatment-emergent doravirine resistance-associated substitutions can confer cross resistance to efavirenz, etravirine, nevirapine, and rilpivirine. Of the 6 virologic failure participants who developed doravirine phenotypic resistance, all had phenotypic resistance to efavirenz and nevirapine, 4 had phenotypic resistance to rilpivirine, and 4 had resistance to etravirine in the Monogram PhenoSense assay. Of the 11 virologic failure participants phenotypically resistant to efavirenz, 2 (18%) had decreased susceptibility to doravirine (18-and 36-fold).
The treatment-emergent doravirine resistance-associated substitution Y318F did not confer reduced susceptibility to efavirenz, etravirine, or rilpivirine.
A panel of 96 diverse clinical isolates containing NNRTI resistance-associated substitutions was evaluated for susceptibility to doravirine. Clinical isolates containing the Y188L substitution alone or in combination with K103N or V106I, V106A in combination with G190A and F227L, or E138K in combination with Y181C and M230L showed greater than 100-fold reduced susceptibility to doravirine.
Lamivudine
Cross-resistance has been observed among NRTIs. The M184I/V lamivudine resistance-associated substitution confers resistance to abacavir, didanosine and emtricitabine. Lamivudine also has reduced susceptibility against the K65R substitution.
TDF
Cross-resistance has been observed among NRTIs. The K65R substitution in HIV-1 RT selected by tenofovir is also selected in some patients living with HIV treated with abacavir or didanosine. HIV-1 isolates with the K65R substitution also showed reduced susceptibility to emtricitabine and lamivudine. Therefore, cross-resistance among these NRTIs may occur in patients whose virus harbors the K65R substitution. The K70E substitution selected clinically by TDF results in reduced susceptibility to abacavir, didanosine, emtricitabine, lamivudine, and tenofovir. HIV-1 isolates from patients (n=20) whose HIV-1 expressed a mean of 3 zidovudine resistance-associated substitutions (M41L, D67N, K70R, L210W, T215Y/F, or K219Q/E/N) showed a 3.1-fold decrease in the susceptibility to tenofovir. Participants whose virus expressed an RT L74V substitution without zidovudine resistance-associated substitutions (n=8) had reduced response to TDF. Limited data are available for patients whose virus expressed a Y115F substitution (n=3), Q151M substitution (n=2), or T69 insertion (n=4) in HIV-1 RT, all of whom had a reduced response in clinical trials.
Clinical Studies
Clinical Trial Results In Adults With No Antiretroviral Treatment History
The efficacy of DELSTRIGO is based on the analyses of 96-week data from a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, active controlled Phase 3 trial (DRIVE-AHEAD, NCT02403674) in participants living with HIV with no antiretroviral treatment history (n=728).
Participants were randomized and received at least 1 dose of either DELSTRIGO or EFV 600 mg/FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg once daily. At baseline, the median age of participants was 31 years, 15% were female, 52% were Non-White, 3% had hepatitis B or C coinfection, 14% had a history of AIDS, 21% had HIV-1 RNA greater than 100,000 copies/mL, and 88% had CD4+ T-cell count greater than 200 cells/mm³; these characteristics were similar between treatment groups. Week 96 outcomes for DRIVE-AHEAD are provided in Table 10.
Mean CD4+ T-cell counts in the DELSTRIGO and EFV/FTC/TDF groups increased from baseline by 238 and 223 cells/mm³, respectively.
Table 10: Virologic Outcome in DRIVE-AHEAD at Week 96 in HIV-1 Adult Participants with No Antiretroviral Treatment History
| Outcome |
DELSTRIGO Once Daily
N=364 |
EFV/FTC/TDF Once Daily
N=364 |
| HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL |
77% |
74% |
| Treatment Difference (95% CI) * |
3.8% (-2.4%, 10.0%) |
| HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL† |
15% |
12% |
| No Virologic Data at Week 96 Window |
7% |
14% |
| Discontinued study due to AE or Death‡ |
3% |
8% |
| Discontinued study for Other Reasons§ |
4% |
5% |
| On study but missing data in window |
1% |
1% |
| Proportion (%) of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 96 by Baseline and Demographic Category |
| Gender |
| Male |
78% (N = 305) |
73% (N = 311) |
| Female |
75% (N = 59) |
75% (N = 53) |
| Race |
| White |
80% (N = 176) |
74% (N = 170) |
| Non-White |
76% (N = 188) |
74% (N = 194) |
| Ethnicity¶ |
| Hispanic or Latino |
81% (N = 126) |
77% (N = 119) |
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
76% (N = 238) |
72% (N = 239) |
| Baseline HIV-1 RNA (copies/mL) |
| ≤100,000 copies/mL |
80% (N = 291) |
77% (N = 282) |
| >100,000 copies/mL |
67% (N = 73) |
62% (N = 82) |
| CD4+ T-cell Count (cells/mm³) |
| ≤200 cells/mm³ |
59% (N = 44) |
70% (N = 46) |
| >200 cells/mm³ |
80% (N = 320) |
74% (N = 318) |
| Viral Subtype¶ |
| Subtype B |
80% (N = 232) |
72% (N = 253) |
| Subtype Non-B |
73% (N = 130) |
77% (N = 111) |
*The 95% CI for the treatment difference was calculated using stratum-adjusted Mantel-Haenszel method.
†Includes participants who discontinued study drug or study before Week 96 for lack or loss of efficacy and participants with HIV-1 RNA equal to or above 50 copies/mL in the Week 96 window.
‡Includes participants who discontinued because of adverse event (AE) or death if this resulted in no virologic data in the Week 96 window.
§Other reasons include: lost to follow-up, non-compliance with study drug, physician decision, pregnancy, protocol deviation, screen failure, withdrawal by participant.
¶Does not include participants whose ethnicity or viral subtypes were unknown. |
Clinical Trial Results In Virologically-Suppressed Adults
The efficacy of switching from a baseline regimen consisting of two NRTIs in combination with a PI plus either ritonavir or cobicistat, or elvitegravir plus cobicistat, or an NNRTI to DELSTRIGO was evaluated in a randomized, open-label trial (DRIVE-SHIFT, NCT02397096), in virologically-suppressed adults living with HIV. Participants must have been virologically-suppressed (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL) on their baseline regimen for at least 6 months prior to trial entry, with no history of virologic failure. Participants were randomized to either switch to DELSTRIGO at baseline [n = 447, Immediate Switch Group (ISG)], or stay on their baseline regimen until Week 24, at which point they switched to DELSTRIGO [n = 223, Delayed Switch Group (DSG)].
At baseline, the median age of participants was 43 years, 16% were female, and 24% were Non-White, 21% were of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, 3% had hepatitis B and/or C virus co-infection, 17% had a history of AIDS, 96% had CD4+ T-cell count greater than or equal to 200 cells/mm³, 70% were on a regimen containing a PI plus ritonavir, 24% were on a regimen containing an NNRTI, 6% were on a regimen containing elvitegravir plus cobicistat, and 1% were on a regimen containing a PI plus cobicistat; these characteristics were similar between treatment groups.
Virologic outcome results are shown in Table 11.
Table 11: Virologic Outcomes in DRIVE-SHIFT in HIV-1 Virologically-Suppressed Participants Who Switched to DELSTRIGO
| Outcome |
DELSTRIGO Once Daily ISG Week 48
N=447 |
Baseline Regimen DSG Week 24
N=223 |
| HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL* |
2% |
1% |
| ISG-DSG, Difference (95% CI)†,‡ |
0.7% (-1.3%, 2.6%) |
| HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL |
91% |
95% |
| No Virologic Data Within the Time Window |
8% |
4% |
| Discontinued study due to AE or Death§ |
3% |
<1% |
| Discontinued study for Other Reasons¶ |
4% |
4% |
| On study but missing data in window |
0 |
0 |
| Proportion (%) of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL by Baseline and Demographic Category |
| Age (years) |
| <50 |
90% (N = 320) |
95% (N = 157) |
| ≥50 |
94% (N = 127) |
94% (N = 66) |
| Gender |
| Male |
91% (N = 372) |
94% (N = 194) |
| Female |
91% (N = 75) |
100% (N = 29) |
| Race |
| White |
90% (N = 344) |
95% (N = 168) |
| Non-White |
93% (N = 103) |
93% (N = 55) |
| Ethnicity |
| Hispanic or Latino |
88% (N = 99) |
91% (N = 45) |
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
91% (N = 341) |
95% (N = 175) |
| CD4+ T-cell Count (cells/mm³) |
| <200 cells/mm³ |
85% (N = 13) |
75% (N = 4) |
| ≥200 cells/mm³ |
91 % (N = 426) |
95% (N = 216) |
| Baseline Regimen# |
| PI plus either ritonavir or cobicistat |
90% (N = 316) |
94% (N = 156) |
| elvitegravir plus cobicistat or NNRTI |
93% (N = 131) |
96% (N = 67) |
*Includes participants who discontinued study drug or study before Week 48 for ISG or before Week 24 for DSG for lack or loss of efficacy and participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL in the Week 48 window for ISG and in the Week 24 window for DSG
†The 95% CI for the treatment difference was calculated using stratum-adjusted Mantel-Haenszel method.
‡Assessed using a non-inferiority margin of 4%.
§Includes participants who discontinued because of adverse event (AE) or death if this resulted in no virologic data on treatment during the specified window.
¶Other reasons include: lost to follow-up, non-compliance with study drug, physician decision, protocol deviation, withdrawal by participant.
#Baseline Regimen = PI plus either ritonavir or cobicistat (specifically atazanavir, darunavir, or lopinavir), or elvitegravir plus cobicistat, or NNRTI (specifically efavirenz, nevirapine, or rilpivirine), each administered with two NRTIs. |
Clinical Trial Results In Pediatric Participants
The efficacy of DELSTRIGO was evaluated in cohort 2 of an open-label, single-arm 2-cohort trial in pediatric participants 12 to less than 18 years of age living with HIV (IMPAACT 2014 (Protocol 027), NCT03332095). In cohort 1, virologically-suppressed participants (n=9) received a single 100 mg dose of doravirine followed by intensive PK sampling. In cohort 2, virologically-suppressed participants (n=43) were switched to DELSTRIGO and treatment-naïve participants (n=2) were started on DELSTRIGO.
In cohort 2, at baseline the median age of participants was 15 years (range: 12 to 17), the median weight was 52 kg (range: 45 to 80), 58% were female, 78% were Asian and 22% were Black, and the median CD4+ T-cell count was 713 cells per mm³ (range 84 to 1397). After switching to DELSTRIGO, 95% (41/43) of virologically-suppressed participants remained suppressed (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL) at Week 24. One of the two treatment-naïve participants achieved HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 24. The other treatment-naïve participant met the protocol-defined virologic failure criteria (defined as 2 consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA test results ≥200 copies/mL at or after Week 24) and was evaluated for the development of resistance; no emergence of genotypic or phenotypic resistance to doravirine, lamivudine, or tenofovir was detected.