Clinical Pharmacology for Cabenuva
Mechanism Of Action
CABENUVA contains 2 long-acting HIV-1 antiretroviral drugs, cabotegravir and rilpivirine [see Microbiology].
Pharmacodynamics
Cardiac Electrophysiology
At a dose of cabotegravir 150 mg orally every 12 hours (10 times the recommended total daily oral lead-in dosage of CABENUVA), the QT interval is not prolonged to any clinically relevant extent. Administration of 3 doses of cabotegravir 150 mg orally every 12 hours resulted in a geometric mean Cmax approximately 2.8-, 5.4-, and 5.6-fold above the geometric mean steady-state Cmax associated with the recommended 30-mg dose of oral cabotegravir, the recommended 400-mg dose given monthly, and the recommended 600-mg dose given every 2 months of cabotegravir extended-release injectable suspension, respectively.
At the recommended dose of rilpivirine 25 mg orally once daily, the QT interval is not prolonged to any clinically relevant extent. The rilpivirine 25-mg once-daily mean steady-state Cmax was 247 ng/mL, which is 1.7-fold higher than the mean steady-state Cmax observed with the recommended 600-mg dose of rilpivirine extended-release injectable suspension given monthly and 1.6-fold higher than the mean steady-state Cmax observed with the recommended 900-mg dose of rilpivirine extended-release injectable suspension given every 2 months.
When rilpivirine 75-mg and 300-mg once-daily oral doses (3 and 12 times, respectively, the recommended oral lead-in dosage) were studied in healthy adults, the maximum mean time-matched (95% upper confidence bound) differences in QTcF interval were 10.7 (15.3) and 23.3 (28.4) msec, respectively, after baseline and placebo adjustment. Steady-state administration of rilpivirine 75 mg once daily and 300 mg once daily resulted in a mean steady-state Cmax approximately 4.4- and 11.6-fold, respectively, higher than the mean steady-state Cmax observed with the recommended 600-mg dose of rilpivirine extended-release injectable suspension given monthly and approximately 4.1- and 10.7-fold, respectively, higher than the mean steady-state Cmax observed with the recommended 900-mg dose of rilpivirine extended-release injectable suspension given every 2 months. The corresponding Cmax ratios are 2.6 and 6.7 when compared with the recommended oral rilpivirine dosage [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS].
Pharmacokinetics
Absorption, Distribution, And Elimination
The pharmacokinetic properties of the components of CABENUVA are provided in Table 9. The multiple-dose pharmacokinetic parameters are provided in Table 10. For the pharmacokinetic properties of oral cabotegravir and oral rilpivirine, refer to the full prescribing information for VOCABRIA (cabotegravir) and EDURANT (rilpivirine), respectively.
Table 9: Pharmacokinetic Properties of the Components of CABENUVA
|
Cabotegravir |
Rilpivirine |
| Absorptiona |
| Tmax (days), median |
7 |
3 to 4 |
| Distribution |
| % Bound to human plasma proteins |
>99.8 |
99.7 |
| Blood-to-plasma ratio |
0.52 |
0.7 |
| CSF-to-plasma concentration ratio (median [range])b |
0.003 (0.002 to 0.004) |
0.01 (BLQ to 0.02) |
| Elimination |
| t½ (weeks), meanc |
5.6 to 11.5 |
13 to 28 |
| Metabolism |
| Metabolic pathways |
UGT1A1 UGT1A9 (minor) |
CYP3A |
| Excretion |
| Major route of elimination |
Metabolism |
Metabolism |
| % of dose excreted as total 14C (unchanged drug) in urined |
27 (0) |
6 (<1) |
| % of dose excreted as total 14C (unchanged drug) in fecesd |
59 (47) |
85 (26) |
CSF = Cerebrospinal fluid, BLQ = Below limit of quantification.
a When taken orally with a high-fat meal versus fasted, the AUC(0-inf) (geometric mean ratio [90% CI] of cabotegravir and rilpivirine are 1.14 [1.02, 1.28] and 1.72 [1.36, 2.16]), respectively.
b The clinical relevance of CSF-to-plasma concentration ratios is unknown. Concentrations were measured at steady-state 1 week after intramuscular administration of cabotegravir and rilpivirine extended-release injectable suspensions given monthly or every 2 months.
c Elimination half-life driven by slow absorption rate from the intramuscular injection site.
d Dosing in mass balance studies: single-dose oral administration of [14C] cabotegravir; single-dose oral administration of [14C] rilpivirine. |
Table 10. Pharmacokinetic Parameters following Once-Daily Oral Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine and following Initiation and Monthly and Every-2-Month Continuation Intramuscular Injections of the Components of CABENUVA in Adults
| Drug |
Dosing Phase |
Dosage Regimen |
Geometric Mean (5th, 95th Percentile)a |
| AUC(0-tau)b (mcg•h/mL) |
Cmax (mcg/mL) |
Ctaub (mcg/mL) |
| Cabotegravir |
Oral lead-inc |
30 mg once daily |
145
(93.5, 224) |
8.0
(5.3, 11.9) |
4.6
(2.8, 7.5) |
Initial injection
(after oral lead-in)d |
600 mg IM initial dose |
1,591
(714; 3,245) |
8.0
(5.3, 11.9) |
1.5
(0.65, 2.9) |
Initial injection
(direct to injection)e |
600 mg IM initial dose |
- |
1.89
(0.438, 5.69) |
1.43
(0.403, 3.90) |
| Monthly injection f |
400 mg IM monthly |
2,415
(1,494; 3,645) |
4.2
(2.5, 6.5) |
2.8
(1.7, 4.6) |
| Every-2- month injectionf |
600 mg IM every 2 months |
3,764
(2,431; 5,857) |
4.0
(2.3, 6.8) |
1.6
(0.8, 3.0) |
| Drug |
Dosing Phase |
Dosage Regimen |
Geometric Mean
(5th, 95th Percentile)a |
AUC(0-tau)b
(ng•h/mL) |
Cmax
(ng/mL) |
Ctaub (ng/mL) |
| Rilpivirine |
Oral lead-inc,g |
25 mg once daily |
2,083
(1,125; 3,748) |
116
(48.6, 244) |
79.4
(31.8, 177) |
Initial injection
(after oral lead-in)d |
900 mg IM initial dose |
44,842
(21,712; 87,575) |
144
(93.9, 221) |
41.9
(21.7, 78.9) |
Initial injection
(direct to injection)e |
900 mg IM initial dose |
- |
68
(27.5, 220) |
48.9
(17.7, 138) |
| Monthly injectionf |
600 mg IM monthly |
68,324
(39,042; 118,111) |
121
(68.1, 210) |
85.8
(49.6, 147) |
| Every-2- month injectionf |
900 mg IM every 2 months |
132,450
(76,638; 221,783) |
138
(80.6, 228) |
68.9
(38.0, 119) |
IM = Intramuscular.
a Pharmacokinetic parameter values were based on individual post-hoc estimates from separate cabotegravir and rilpivirine population pharmacokinetic models (cabotegravir: pooled FLAIR and ATLAS for the oral, initial, and monthly injection dosing schedule and ATLAS-2M [participants with no prior exposure to cabotegravir plus rilpivirine] for the every-2-month injection dosing schedule; rilpivirine: pooled FLAIR, ATLAS, and ATLAS-2M [participants with no prior exposure], except for initial injection (direct to injection) [see footnote e] and for oral rilpivirine [see footnote g]).
b tau is dosing interval: 24 hours for oral cabotegravir and rilpivirine, 1 month for cabotegravir and rilpivirine extended-release injectable suspensions given monthly, 2 months for cabotegravir and rilpivirine extended-release injectable suspensions given every 2 months.
c Oral lead-in pharmacokinetic parameter values represent steady-state.
d Initial injection Cmax values primarily reflect oral dosing because the initial injection was administered on the same day as the last oral dose; however, AUC(0-tau) and the Ctau values reflect the initial injections for cabotegravir and rilpivirine.
e Pharmacokinetic parameters for initial injection (direct to injection) based on observed data from FLAIR Extension Phase (n = 110), AUC not calculated based on observed data, Cmax = 1 week following initial injection, Ctau = 1 month following initial injection.
f Monthly and every-2-month injection pharmacokinetic parameter values represent Week 48 data.
g Oral rilpivirine: AUC(0-tau) based on population pharmacokinetic estimates of rilpivirine 25 mg once daily from pooled Phase 3 trials with EDURANT (rilpivirine); Ctau based on observed data from FLAIR, ATLAS, and ATLAS-2M; Cmax based on observed data for rilpivirine 25 mg once daily from a pharmacokinetic substudy in pooled Phase 3 trials with EDURANT (rilpivirine). |
Specific Populations
No clinically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of cabotegravir or rilpivirine were observed based on age, sex, race/ethnicity, BMI, or UGT1A1 polymorphisms.
Cabotegravir and rilpivirine concentrations in participants who were hepatitis C virus antibody positive at baseline were similar to those in the overall study population. The effect of hepatitis B virus co-infection on the pharmacokinetics of cabotegravir is unknown. No clinically relevant differences in the pharmacokinetics of oral rilpivirine have been observed with hepatitis B and/or C virus co-infection.
Patients With Renal Impairment
With oral cabotegravir, no clinically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of cabotegravir are expected in patients with mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment. Cabotegravir has not been studied in patients with end-stage renal disease not on dialysis. As cabotegravir is >99% protein bound, dialysis is not expected to alter exposures of cabotegravir [see Use In Specific Populations].
Population pharmacokinetic analyses indicated that mild renal impairment had no clinically relevant effect on the exposure of oral rilpivirine. There is limited or no information regarding the pharmacokinetics of rilpivirine in patients with moderate or severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease not on dialysis. As rilpivirine is >99% protein bound, dialysis is not expected to alter exposures of rilpivirine [see Use In Specific Populations].
Patients With Hepatic Impairment
No clinically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of cabotegravir are expected in mild to moderate (Child-Pugh A or B) hepatic impairment. The effect of severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh C) on the pharmacokinetics of cabotegravir has not been studied [see Use In Specific Populations].
No clinically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of rilpivirine were observed in mild to moderate (Child-Pugh A or B) hepatic impairment. The effect of severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh C) has not been studied [see Use In Specific Populations].
Geriatric Patients
The pharmacokinetics of cabotegravir (oral or injectable) and of injectable rilpivirine have not been studied and data are limited in participants aged 65 years or older [see Use In Specific Populations].
Pediatric Patients
Population pharmacokinetic analyses revealed no clinically relevant differences in exposure between adolescent participants (weighing ≥35 kg and aged at least 12 years) and adult participants with and without HIV-1 from the cabotegravir or rilpivirine development program.
Table 11: Pharmacokinetic Parameters following Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine Orally Once Daily, and Initiation, Monthly, and Every-2-Months Continuation Intramuscular Injections in Adolescents Aged 12 to Younger than 18 Years (≥35 kg)
| Drug |
Dosing Phase |
Dosage Regimen |
Geometric Mean (5th, 95th Percentile)a |
| AUC(0-tau)b (mcg•h/mL) |
Cmax (mcg/mL) |
Ctaub (mcg/mL) |
| Cabotegravir |
Oral lead-inc |
30 mg once daily |
203
(136, 320) |
10.7
(7.36, 16.6) |
6.43
(4.15, 10.5) |
| Initial injectiond |
600 mg IM initial dose |
2,085
(1,056; 4,259) |
10.8
(7.42, 16.6) |
1.88
(0.801, 3.71) |
| Every-1- month injectione |
400 mg IM every 1 month |
3,416
(2,303; 5,109) |
5.73
(3.76, 8.90) |
4.24
(2.74, 6.45) |
| Every-2- months injectione |
600 mg IM every 2 months |
5,184
(3,511; 7,677) |
5.10
(3.06, 8.24) |
2.54
(1.25, 4.19) |
| Drug |
Dosing Phase |
Dosage Regimen |
Geometric Mean
(5th, 95th Percentile)a |
AUC(0-tau)b
(ng•h/mL) |
Cmax
(ng/mL) |
Ctaub (ng/mL) |
| Rilpivirine |
Oral lead-inc |
25 mg PO once daily |
2,389
(1,259; 4,414) |
144
(80.8, 234) |
76.1
(27.9, 184) |
| Initial injectiond |
900 mg IM initial dose |
35,259
(20,301; 63,047) |
135
(85.8, 211) |
36.5
(22.4, 59.4) |
| Every-1- month injectione |
600 mg IM every month |
84,280
(49,444; 156,987) |
146
(84.8, 269) |
109
(64.8, 202) |
| Every-2- months injectione |
900 mg IM every 2 months |
110,686
(78,480; 151,744) |
108
(68.0, 164) |
61.8
(44.5, 88.0) |
IM = intramuscular, PO = by mouth.
a Pharmacokinetic parameter values for cabotegravir were based on individual post-hoc estimates from population pharmacokinetic models in both adolescents with HIV-1 (n = 147) weighing 35.2 to 98.5 kg and adolescents without HIV-1 (n = 62) weighing 39.9 to 167 kg. Pharmacokinetic parameter values for rilpivirine were based on individual post-hoc estimates from a population pharmacokinetic model in adolescents with HIV-1 (n = 148) weighing 35.2 to 98.5 kg.
b tau is dosing interval: 24 hours for oral administration, 1 month for the initial injection and monthly intramuscular injections, and 2 months for every-2-months intramuscular injections of extended-release injectable suspension.
c Oral lead-in pharmacokinetic parameter values represent steady-state.
d Initial injection Cmax values primarily reflect oral dosing because the initial injection was administered on the same day as the last oral dose; however, the AUC(0-tau) and Ctau values reflect the initial injection.
e Monthly and every-2-month injection pharmacokinetic parameter values represent Week 48 data. |
Drug Interaction Studies
Cabotegravir is not a clinically relevant inhibitor of the following enzymes and transporters: CYP1A2, 2A6, 2B6, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, and 3A4; UGT1A1, 1A3, 1A4, 1A6, 1A9, 2B4, 2B7, 2B15, and 2B17; P-glycoprotein (P-gp); breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP); bile salt export pump (BSEP); organic cation transporter (OCT)1, OCT2; organic anion transporter polypeptide (OATP)1B1, OATP1B3; multidrug and toxin extrusion transporter (MATE) 1, MATE 2-K; and multidrug resistance protein (MRP)2 or MRP4.
In vitro, cabotegravir inhibited renal OAT1 (IC50 = 0.81 microM) and OAT3 (IC50 = 0.41 microM). Based on physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling, cabotegravir may increase the AUC of OAT1/3 substrates up to approximately 80%.
In vitro, cabotegravir did not induce CYP1A2, CYP2B6, or CYP3A4.
Simulations using PBPK modeling show that no clinically significant interaction is expected during coadministration of cabotegravir with drugs that inhibit UGT1A1.
In vitro, cabotegravir was not a substrate of OATP1B1, OATP1B3, OATP2B1, or OCT1.
Cabotegravir is a substrate of P-gp and BCRP in vitro; however, because of its high permeability, no alteration in cabotegravir absorption is expected with coadministration of P-gp or BCRP inhibitors.
Rilpivirine is not likely to have a clinically relevant effect on the exposure of drugs metabolized by CYP enzymes.
Drug interaction studies were not conducted with injectable cabotegravir or injectable rilpivirine. Drug interaction studies with oral cabotegravir or oral rilpivirine are summarized in Tables 12, 13, 14, and 15.
Table 12: Effect of Coadministered Drugs on the Pharmacokinetics of Cabotegravir
| Coadministered Drug(s) and Dose(s) |
Dose of Cabotegravir |
n |
Geometric Mean Ratio (90% CI) of Cabotegravir Pharmacokinetic Parameters with/without Coadministered Drugs No Effect = 1.00 |
| Cmax |
AUC |
Ctau or C24 |
| Etravirine 200 mg twice daily |
30 mg once daily |
12 |
1.04
(0.99, 1.09) |
1.01
(0.96, 1.06) |
1.00
(0.94, 1.06) |
| Rifabutin 300 mg once daily |
30 mg once daily |
12 |
0.83
(0.76, 0.90) |
0.79
(0.74, 0.83) |
0.74
(0.70, 0.78) |
| Rifampin 600 mg once daily |
30-mg single dose |
15 |
0.94
(0.87, 1.02) |
0.41
(0.36, 0.46) |
0.50
(0.44, 0.57) |
| Rilpivirine 25 mg once daily |
30 mg once daily |
11 |
1.05
(0.96, 1.15) |
1.12
(1.05, 1.19) |
1.14
(1.04, 1.24) |
| n = Maximum number of participants with data, CI = Confidence Interval. |
Table 13: Effect of Coadministered Drugs on the Pharmacokinetics of Rilpivirine
| Coadministered Drug(s) and Dose(s) |
Dose of Rilpivirine |
n |
Geometric Mean Ratio (90% CI) of Rilpivirine Pharmacokinetic Parameters with/without Coadministered Drugs No Effect = 1.00 |
| Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
| Acetaminophen 500-mg single dose |
150 mg once dailya |
16 |
1.09
(1.01 to 1.18) |
1.16
(1.10 to 1.22) |
1.26
(1.16 to 1.38) |
| Atorvastatin 40 mg once daily |
150 mg once dailya |
16 |
0.91
(0.79 to 1.06) |
0.90
(0.81 to 0.99) |
0.90
(0.84 to 0.96) |
| Chlorzoxazone 500-mg single dose taken 2 hours after rilpivirine |
150 mg once dailya |
16 |
1.17
(1.08 to 1.27) |
1.25
(1.16 to 1.35) |
1.18
(1.09 to 1.28) |
| Darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once daily |
150 mg once dailya |
14 |
1.79
(1.56 to 2.06) |
2.30
(1.98 to 2.67) |
2.78
(2.39 to 3.24) |
| Didanosine 400 mg once daily delayed-release capsules taken 2 hours before rilpivirine |
150 mg once dailya |
21 |
1.00
(0.90 to 1.10) |
1.00
(0.95 to 1.06) |
1.00
(0.92 to 1.09) |
| Ethinyl estradiol/ norethindrone 0.035 mg once daily/ 1 mg once daily |
25 mg once daily |
15 |
↔b |
↔b |
↔b |
| Ketoconazole 400 mg once daily |
150 mg once dailyb |
15 |
1.30
(1.13 to 1.48) |
1.49
(1.31 to 1.70) |
1.76
(1.57 to 1.97) |
Lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg twice daily
(soft gel capsule) |
150 mg once dailya |
15 |
1.29
(1.18 to 1.40) |
1.52
(1.36 to 1.70) |
1.74
(1.46 to 2.08) |
| Methadone 60 to 100 mg once daily, individualized dose |
25 mg once daily |
12 |
↔b |
↔b |
↔b |
| Raltegravir 400 mg twice daily |
25 mg once daily |
23 |
1.12
(1.04 to 1.20) |
1.12
(1.05 to 1.19) |
1.03
(0.96 to 1.12) |
| Rifabutin 300 mg once daily |
25 mg once daily |
18 |
0.69
(0.62 to 0.76) |
0.58
(0.52 to 0.65) |
0.52
(0.46 to 0.59) |
| Rifabutin 300 mg once daily |
50 mg once daily |
18 |
1.43
(1.30 to 1.56) |
1.16
(1.06 to 1.26) |
0.93
(0.85 to 1.01) |
| (reference arm for comparison was 25 mg once-daily rilpivirine administered alone) |
| Rifampin 600 mg once daily |
150 mg once dailya |
16 |
0.31
(0.27 to 0.36) |
0.20
(0.18 to 0.23) |
0.11
(0.10 to 0.13) |
| Sildenafil 50-mg single dose |
75 mg once dailya |
16 |
0.92
(0.85 to 0.99) |
0.98
(0.92 to 1.05) |
1.04
(0.98 to 1.09) |
| Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg once daily |
150 mg once dailya |
16 |
0.96
(0.81 to 1.13) |
1.01
(0.87 to 1.18) |
0.99
(0.83 to 1.16) |
n = Maximum number of participants with data, CI = Confidence Interval, ↔ = No change.
a This interaction study has been performed with a dose higher than the recommended dose for rilpivirine (25 mg once daily) assessing the maximal effect on the coadministered drug.
b Comparison based on historic controls. |
Table 14: Effect of Cabotegravir on the Pharmacokinetics of Coadministered Drugs
| Coadministered Drug(s) and Dose(s) |
Dose of Cabotegravir |
n |
Geometric Mean Ratio (90% CI) of Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Coadministered Drug with/without Cabotegravir No Effect = 1.00 |
| Cmax |
AUC |
Ctau or C24 |
| Ethinyl estradiol 0.03 mg once daily |
30 mg once daily |
19 |
0.92
(0.83, 1.03) |
1.02
(0.97, 1.08) |
1.00
(0.92, 1.10) |
| Levonorgestrel 0.15 mg once daily |
30 mg once daily |
19 |
1.05
(0.96, 1.15) |
1.12
(1.07, 1.18) |
1.07
(1.01, 1.15) |
| Midazolam 3 mg |
30 mg once daily |
12 |
1.09
(0.94, 1.26) |
1.10
(0.95, 1.26) |
NA |
| Rilpivirine 25 mg once daily |
30 mg once daily |
11 |
0.96
(0.85, 1.09) |
0.99
(0.89, 1.09) |
0.92
(0.79, 1.07) |
| n = Maximum number of participants with data, CI = Confidence Interval, NA = Not available. |
Table 15: Effect of Rilpivirine on the Pharmacokinetics of Coadministered Drugs
| Coadministered Drug(s) and Dose(s) |
Dose of Rilpivirine |
n |
Geometric Mean Ratio (90% CI) of Coadministered Drug Pharmacokinetic Parameters with/without EDURANT No Effect = 1.00 |
| Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
| Acetaminophen 500-mg single dose |
150 mg once dailya |
16 |
0.97
(0.86 to 1.10) |
0.91
(0.86 to 0.97) |
NA |
| Atorvastatin 40 mg once daily 2-hydroxy-atorvastatin 4-hydroxy-atorvastatin |
150 mg once dailya |
16 |
1.35
(1.08 to 1.68) |
1.04
(0.97 to 1.12) |
0.85
(0.69 to 1.03) |
1.58
(1.33 to 1.87) |
1.39
(1.29 to 1.50) |
1.32
(1.10 to 1.58) |
1.28
(1.15 to 1.43) |
1.23
(1.13 to 1.33) |
NA |
| Chlorzoxazone 500-mg single dose taken 2 hours after rilpivirine |
150 mg once dailya |
16 |
0.98
(0.85 to 1.13) |
1.03
(0.95 to 1.13) |
NA |
| Darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once daily |
150 mg once dailya |
15 |
0.90
(0.81 to 1.00) |
0.89
(0.81 to 0.99) |
0.89
(0.68 to 1.16) |
| Didanosine 400 mg once daily delayed-release capsules taken 2 hours before rilpivirine |
150 mg once dailya |
13 |
0.96
(0.80 to 1.14) |
1.12
(0.99 to 1.27) |
NA |
| Digoxin 0.5-mg single dose |
25 mg once daily |
22 |
1.06
(0.97 to 1.17) |
0.98
(0.93 to 1.04)b |
NA |
| Ethinyl estradiol 0.035 mg once daily Norethindrone 1 mg once daily |
25 mg once daily |
17 |
1.17
(1.06 to 1.30) |
1.14
(1.10 to 1.19) |
1.09
(1.03 to 1.16) |
0.94
(0.83 to 1.06) |
0.89
(0.84 to 0.94) |
0.99
(0.90 to 1.08) |
| Ketoconazole 400 mg once daily |
150 mg once dailya |
14 |
0.85
(0.80 to 0.90) |
0.76
(0.70 to 0.82) |
0.34
(0.25 to 0.46) |
Lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg twice daily
(soft gel capsule) |
150 mg once dailya |
15 |
0.96
(0.88 to 1.05) |
0.99
(0.89 to 1.10) |
0.89
(0.73 to 1.08) |
| Methadone 60 to 100 mg once daily, individualized dose R(-) methadone S(+) methadone |
25 mg once daily |
13 |
0.86
(0.78 to 0.95) |
0.84
(0.74 to 0.95) |
0.78
(0.67 to 0.91) |
0.87
(0.78 to 0.97) |
0.84
(0.74 to 0.96) |
0.79
(0.67 to 0.92) |
| Metformin 850-mg single dose |
25 mg once daily |
20 |
1.02
(0.95 to -1.10) |
0.97
(0.90 to 1.06)c |
NA |
| Raltegravir 400 mg twice daily |
25 mg once daily |
23 |
1.10
(0.77 to 1.58) |
1.09
(0.81 to 1.47) |
1.27
(1.01 to 1.60) |
| Rifampin 600 mg once daily 25-desacetylrifampin |
150 mg once dailya |
16 |
1.02
(0.93 to 1.12) |
0.99
(0.92 to 1.07) |
NA |
1.00
(0.87 to 1.15) |
0.91
(0.77 to 1.07) |
NA |
| Sildenafil 50-mg single dose |
75 mg once dailya |
16 |
0.93
(0.80 to 1.08) |
0.97
(0.87 to 1.08) |
NA |
| N-desmethyl-sildenafil |
0.90
(0.80 to 1.02) |
0.92
(0.85 to 0.99)b |
NA |
| Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg once daily |
150 mg once dailya |
16 |
1.19
(1.06 to 1.34) |
1.23
(1.16 to 1.31) |
1.24
(1.10 to 1.38) |
n = Maximum number of participants with data, CI = Confidence Interval, NA = Not available.
a This interaction study has been performed with a dose higher than the recommended dose for rilpivirine (25 mg once daily) assessing the maximal effect on the coadministered drug.
b AUC(0-last)
c n = (maximum number of participants with data) for AUC(0-∞) = 15. |
Microbiology
Mechanism Of Action
Cabotegravir inhibits HIV integrase by binding to the integrase active site and blocking the strand transfer step of retroviral deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) integration that is essential for the HIV replication cycle. The mean 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) value of cabotegravir in a strand transfer assay using purified recombinant HIV-1 integrase was 3.0 nM.
Rilpivirine is a diarylpyrimidine NNRTI of HIV-1 and inhibits HIV-1 replication by non-competitive inhibition of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT). Rilpivirine does not inhibit the human cellular DNA polymerases α, β, and γ.
Antiviral Activity In Cell Culture
Cabotegravir exhibited antiviral activity against laboratory strains of HIV-1 (subtype B, n = 4) with mean 50 percent effective concentration (EC50) values of 0.22 to 1.7 nM in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and 293 cells. Cabotegravir demonstrated antiviral activity in PBMCs against a panel of 24 HIV-1 clinical isolates (3 in each of group M subtypes A, B, C, D, E, F, and G and 3 in group O) with a median EC50 value of 0.19 nM (range: 0.02 to 1.06 nM, n = 24). The median EC50 value against subtype B clinical isolates was 0.05 nM (range: 0.02 to 0.50 nM, n = 3). Against clinical HIV-2 isolates, the median EC50 value was 0.12 nM (range: 0.10 to 0.14 nM, n = 3).
Rilpivirine exhibited activity against laboratory strains of wild-type HIV-1 in an acutely infected T-cell line with a median EC50 value for HIV-1IIIB of 0.73 nM (0.27 ng/mL). Rilpivirine demonstrated antiviral activity against a broad panel of HIV-1 group M (subtypes A, B, C, D, F, G, and H) primary isolates with EC50 values ranging from 0.07 nM to 1.01 nM (0.03 to 0.37 ng/mL) and was less active against group O primary isolates with EC50 values ranging from 2.88 nM to 8.45 nM (1.06 to 3.10 ng/mL).
In cell culture, cabotegravir was not antagonistic in combination with the NNRTI rilpivirine, or the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) emtricitabine (FTC), lamivudine (3TC), or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF).
The antiviral activity of rilpivirine was not antagonistic when combined with the NNRTIs efavirenz, etravirine, or nevirapine; the NRTIs abacavir, didanosine, emtricitabine, lamivudine, stavudine, tenofovir, or zidovudine; the protease inhibitors amprenavir, atazanavir, darunavir, indinavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir, or tipranavir; the fusion inhibitor enfuvirtide; the CCR5 co-receptor antagonist maraviroc, or the INSTI raltegravir.
Resistance
Cell Culture
Cabotegravir-resistant viruses were selected during passage of HIV-1 strain IIIB in MT-2 cells in the presence of cabotegravir. Amino acid substitutions in integrase that emerged and conferred decreased susceptibility to cabotegravir included Q146L (fold change: 1.3 to 4.6), S153Y (fold change: 2.8 to 8.4), and I162M (fold change: 2.8). The integrase substitution T124A also emerged alone (fold change: 1.1 to 7.4 in cabotegravir susceptibility), in combination with S153Y (fold change: 3.6 to 6.6 in cabotegravir susceptibility) or I162M (2.8-fold change in cabotegravir susceptibility). Cell culture passage of virus harboring integrase substitutions Q148H, Q148K, or Q148R selected for additional substitutions (C56S, V72I, L74M, V75A, T122N, E138K, G140S, G149A, and M154I), with substituted viruses having reduced susceptibility to cabotegravir of 2.0- to 410-fold change. The combinations of E138K+Q148K and V72I+E138K+Q148K conferred the greatest reductions of 53- to 260-fold change and 410-fold change, respectively.
Rilpivirine-resistant strains were selected in cell culture starting from wild-type HIV-1 of different origins and subtypes as well as NNRTI-resistant HIV-1. The frequently observed amino acid substitutions that emerged and conferred decreased phenotypic susceptibility to rilpivirine included L100I; K101E; V106I and A; V108I; E138K and G, Q, R; V179F and I; Y181C and I; V189I; G190E; H221Y; F227C; and M230I and L.
Clinical Trials
In the pooled Phase 3 FLAIR (Week 124) and ATLAS (Week 96) analysis, there were 8 confirmed virologic failures (2 consecutive HIV-1 RNA ≥200 copies/mL) on cabotegravir plus rilpivirine (8/591, 1.4%) and 8 confirmed virologic failures on current antiretroviral regimen (8/591, 1.4%). Of the 8 confirmed virologic failures in the cabotegravir plus rilpivirine arm, 7 (88%) had treatment-emergent NNRTI resistance-associated substitutions K101E, V106V/A, V108I, E138A, E138G, E138K, H221H/L, or M230L in reverse transcriptase, and 6 of them showed reduced phenotypic susceptibility to rilpivirine (range: 2- to 27-fold). One additional participant in the ATLAS Extension Switch on cabotegravir plus rilpivirine had emergent NNRTI resistance substitution E138A at Week 80 with HIV-1 RNA >50 copies/mL and <200 copies/mL.
Additionally, 5 of the 8 (63%) cabotegravir plus rilpivirine confirmed virologic failures had treatment-emergent INSTI resistance-associated substitutions and reduced phenotypic susceptibility to cabotegravir: Q148R (n = 2; 5- and 9-fold decreased susceptibility to cabotegravir), G140R (n = 1; 7-fold decreased susceptibility to cabotegravir), N155H (n = 1; 3-fold decreased susceptibility to cabotegravir), or N155H+R263K (n = 1; 9-fold decreased susceptibility to cabotegravir).
There was another confirmed virologic failure participant at Week 112 in FLAIR who had switched to cabotegravir plus rilpivirine direct to injection at Week 100; there were no INSTI resistance-associated substitutions detected at failure.
In comparison, in the current antiretroviral regimen arm with 8 confirmed virologic failures, 2 of 7 (29%) who had post-baseline resistance data had treatment-emergent resistance substitutions and phenotypic resistance to their antiretroviral drugs; both had treatment-emergent NRTI substitutions, M184V or I, which conferred resistance to emtricitabine or lamivudine in their regimen, and one of them also had the treatment-emergent NNRTI resistance substitution G190S, which conferred resistance to efavirenz in their regimen.
In the ATLAS-2M trial, there were 11 confirmed virologic failures (2 consecutive HIV-1 RNA ≥200 copies/mL) through Week 48: 9 participants (1.7%) in the every-2-month treatment arm and 2 participants (0.4%) in the monthly treatment arm. Of note, 8 of the 11 (73%) participants met confirmed virologic failure criteria at or before the Week 24 injection visit.
Four of the 9 confirmed virologic failure participants in the every-2-month arm transitioned from the oral current antiretroviral regimen arm of ATLAS into this trial.
In the every-2-month treatment arm, 8 of 9 (89%) confirmed virologic failure participants had NNRTI resistance-associated substitutions (E138E/K+V179V/I, K101E+E138A, A98G+K103N, E138K, V179I+Y188L+P225H, Y188L, K103N+E138A, or K101E) at virologic failure. Decreases in rilpivirine susceptibility for these 8 participant isolates ranged from 2- to 30-fold. Six of the 8 participants with NNRTI resistance-associated substitutions also had INSTI resistance-associated substitutions (L74I+Q148Q/R+N155N/H (n = 2), L74I+T97A+N155H, L74I+N155H, N155H, or L74I+Q148R) at failure with cabotegravir fold changes ranging from 1- to 9-fold. The INSTI polymorphism L74I was detected at baseline in 5 of the virologic failure participants by a HIV-1 proviral DNA assay.
In the monthly treatment arm, both of the confirmed virologic failure participants had NNRTI resistance-associated substitutions (K101E+M230L or Y188F+G190Q) at virologic failure with decreased susceptibility to rilpivirine of 17- and >119.2-fold, respectively. Both participants also had INSTI resistance-associated substitutions (N155N/H or Q148R+E138E/K) at failure with decreased susceptibility to cabotegravir of 2- and 5-fold, respectively. Neither participant had the L74I integrase polymorphism at baseline.
Genotypic Baseline Factors Associated With Virologic Failure
An increased risk of cabotegravir plus rilpivirine confirmed virologic failure is associated with baseline virological factors: HIV-1 subtype A1, the presence of baseline integrase L74I polymorphism, and archived NNRTI resistance-associated substitutions.
Association Of Subtype A1 And Baseline L74I Polymorphism In Integrase With Cabotegravir Plus Rilpivirine Virologic Failure
Eight of the 18 (44%) cabotegravir plus rilpivirine confirmed virologic failures in FLAIR, ATLAS, and ATLAS-2M had HIV-1 subtype A1 with 7 of the 8 subtype A1 failures having the integrase polymorphism L74I detected at baseline and failure timepoints (Table 16). There was no detectable phenotypic resistance to cabotegravir conferred by the presence of L74I at baseline. Subtype A1 is uncommon in the U.S.
The presence of the integrase polymorphism L74I in subtype B commonly seen in the U.S. was not associated with virologic failure. In contrast to FLAIR and ATLAS, where all virologic failures were subtype A, A1, or AG, subtypes of the cabotegravir plus rilpivirine virologic failures in ATLAS-2M included A (n = 1), A1 (n = 3), B (n = 4), C (n = 2), and complex/A1 (n = 1).
Association of Archived Baseline NNRTI Substitutions with Cabotegravir plus Rilpivirine Virologic Failure
The presence of archived NNRTI resistance-associated substitutions at baseline detected using an exploratory HIV-1 proviral DNA assay was associated with a higher virologic failure rate in the every-2-month arm of ATLAS-2M and in the cabotegravir plus rilpivirine arm (monthly) of ATLAS compared to without archived NNRTI resistance-associated substitutions (Table 16).
However, in clinical practice, it is unlikely baseline resistance testing will be performed on virologically suppressed patients (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL). Thus, in patients with an incomplete or uncertain NNRTI treatment history, consideration should be given before starting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine treatment.
Table 16: Rate of Confirmed Virologic Failure in FLAIR, ATLAS, and ATLAS-2M: Baselinea Analysis (Subtype Al, Presence of lntegrase Polymorphism L74I, and Presence of Archived NNRTI Resistance-Associated Substitutions)
|
FLAIR CAB+RPV
N = 283 |
FLAIR CAR
N = 283 |
ATLAS CAB+RPV
N = 308 |
ATLAS CAR
N = 308 |
ATLAS-2M Q4W
N = 523 |
ATLAS-2M Q8W
N = 522 |
| Total confirmed virologic failures |
5 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
9 |
| Subtype A1b |
4/8 (50%) |
1/4 (25%) |
1/17 (6%) |
0/21 (0%) |
0/30 (0%) |
4/31 (13%) |
| +L74Ic |
4/5 (80%) |
1/3 (33%) |
1/16 (6%) |
0/19 (0%) |
2/28 (0%) |
3/26 (12%) |
| -L74I |
0/3 (0%) |
0/1 (0%) |
0/1 (0%) |
0/2 (0%) |
0/2 (0%) |
1/5 (20%) |
| Other subtypes |
2/268 (0.7%) |
3/272 (1%) |
2/240 (0.8%) |
4/252 (1.6%) |
2/409 (0.5%) |
5/415 (1.2%) |
| +L74Ic |
0/49 (0%) |
1/43 (2.3%) |
1/29 (3%) |
1/39 (2.6%) |
0/42 (0%) |
2/48 (4%) |
| -L74I |
0/219 (2.5%) |
2/229 (0.9%) |
1/211 (0.5%) |
3/213 (1.4%) |
2/367 (0.5%) |
3/367 (0.8%) |
| Missing data |
7 |
7 |
51 |
35 |
84 |
76 |
| With NNRTI RASd |
NA |
NA |
3/78 (4%) |
2/83 (2%) |
1/128 (0.8%) |
7/117 (6%) |
| Without NNRTI RAS |
NA |
NA |
0/179 (0%) |
2/190 (1%) |
1/310 (0.3%) |
2/327 (0.6%) |
| Missing data |
NA |
NA |
51 |
35 |
84 |
76 |
NNRTI = Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor, CAB+RPV = Cabotegravir + Rilpivirine, CAR = Current Antiretroviral Regimen, RAS = Resistance-Associated Substitutions, NA = Not available.
a Baseline and/or Screening result used.
b Per Standard Monogram Nomenclature Reports. Based on June 2020 Los Alamos National Library panel, the majority of HIV-1 subtype A1 was reclassified as HIV-1 subtype A6.
c L74I and L74L/I mixture.
d Baseline/Screening NNRTI substitutions at L100, K101, K103, V106, V108, E138, V179, Y181, Y188, G190, H221, P225, M230. |
Cross-Resistance
Virologic failure isolates from cabotegravir plus rilpivirine treatment in FLAIR, ATLAS, and ATLAS-2M exhibited cross-resistance to INSTIs and NNRTIs. All confirmed virologic isolates with genotypic evidence of cabotegravir resistance had cross-resistance to elvitegravir and raltegravir but retained phenotypic susceptibility to dolutegravir and when tested bictegravir. Virologic failure isolates with rilpivirine resistance had cross-resistance with NNRTIs delavirdine, doravirine, efavirenz, etravirine, and nevirapine.
Cabotegravir
Cross-resistance has been observed among INSTIs. Cabotegravir had reduced susceptibility (>5-fold change) to recombinant HIV-1 strain NL432 viruses harboring the following integrase amino acid substitutions: G118R, Q148K, Q148R, T66K+L74M, E92Q+N155H, E138A+Q148R, E138K+Q148K/R, G140C+Q148R, G140S+Q148H/K/R, Y143H+N155H, and Q148R+N155H (range: 5.1- to 81-fold). The substitutions E138K+Q148K and Q148R+N155H conferred the greatest reductions in susceptibility of 81- and 61-fold, respectively.
Cabotegravir was active against viruses harboring the NNRTI substitutions K103N or Y188L, or the NRTI substitutions M184V, D67N/K70R/T215Y, or V75I/F77L/F116Y/Q151M.
Rilpivirine
Cross-resistance has been observed among NNRTIs. The single NNRTI substitutions K101P, Y181I, and Y181V conferred 52-, 15-, and 12-times fold change to rilpivirine, respectively. The K103N substitution did not show reduced susceptibility to rilpivirine by itself. Combinations of 2 or 3 NNRTI resistance-associated substitutions gave 3.7- to 554-fold change to rilpivirine in 38% and 66% of substitutions, respectively. Considering all available cell culture and clinical data, any of the following amino acid substitutions, when present at baseline, are likely to decrease the antiviral activity of rilpivirine: K101E and P; E138A, G, K, R, and Q; V179L; Y181C, I, and V; Y188L; H221Y; F227C; M230I and L, and the combination of L100I/K103N.
Clinical Studies
Clinical Trials In Adults
Monthly Dosing Trials
The efficacy of CABENUVA has been evaluated in 2 Phase 3 randomized, multicenter, active-controlled, parallel-arm, open-label, non-inferiority trials:
- Trial 201584 (FLAIR [NCT02938520]), (n = 629): antiretroviral treatment (ART)-naive participants with HIV-1 received a dolutegravir INSTI-containing regimen for 20 weeks (either dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine or dolutegravir plus 2 other NRTIs if participants were HLA-B*5701 positive). Participants who were virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL, n = 566) were then randomized (1:1) to receive either a cabotegravir plus rilpivirine regimen or remain on the current antiretroviral regimen. Participants randomized to receive cabotegravir plus rilpivirine initiated treatment with daily oral lead-in dosing with one 30-mg VOCABRIA (cabotegravir) tablet plus one 25-mg EDURANT (rilpivirine) tablet for at least 4 weeks followed by monthly injections with CABENUVA for an additional 44 weeks [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION].
- Trial 201585 (ATLAS [NCT02951052]), (n = 616): ART-experienced, virologicallyÂsuppressed (for at least 6 months; median prior treatment duration was 4.3 years) participants (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL) with HIV-1 were randomized and received either a cabotegravir plus rilpivirine regimen or remained on their current antiretroviral regimen. Participants randomized to receive cabotegravir plus rilpivirine initiated treatment with daily oral lead-in dosing with one 30-mg VOCABRIA (cabotegravir) tablet plus one 25-mg EDURANT (rilpivirine) tablet for at least 4 weeks followed by monthly injections with CABENUVA for an additional 44 weeks [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION].
The primary analysis was conducted after all participants completed their Week 48 visit or discontinued the trial prematurely.
At baseline, in FLAIR and ATLAS the median age was 34 years and 40 years, 22% and 32% were female, and 24% and 31% were non-White, respectively. In both studies, 7% had CD4+ cell count <350 cells/mm³; these characteristics were similar between treatment arms. In ATLAS, participants received an NNRTI (50%), integrase inhibitor (33%), or protease inhibitor (17%) as their baseline third-agent class prior to randomization; this was similar between treatment arms. Participants with hepatitis B co-infection were excluded from the trial.
The primary endpoint of FLAIR and ATLAS was the proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL at Week 48.
The primary endpoint and other Week 48 outcomes, including outcomes by key baseline factors, for FLAIR and ATLAS are shown in Tables 17 and 18.
Table 17: Virologic Outcomes of Randomized Treatment in FLAIR and ATLAS Trials at Week 48
| Virologic Outcomes |
FLAIR Monthly Dosing |
ATLAS Monthly Dosing |
CAB plus RPV
(n = 283) |
CAR
(n = 283) |
CAB plus RPV
(n = 308) |
CAR
(n = 308) |
| HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mLa |
2% |
2% |
2% |
1% |
| Treatment difference |
-0.4% |
0.7% |
| (95% CI: -2.8%, 2.1%) |
(95% CI: -1 |
.2%, 2.5%) |
| HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL |
94% |
93% |
93% |
95% |
| No virologic data at Week 48 window |
4% |
4% |
6% |
4% |
| Discontinued due to adverse event or death |
3% |
<1% |
4% |
2% |
| Discontinued for other reasons |
1% |
4% |
2% |
2% |
| Missing data during window but on study |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
CAB = Cabotegravir, RPV = Rilpivirine, CAR = Current Antiretroviral Regimen, n = Number of participants in each treatment group, CI = Confidence Interval.
a Includes participants who discontinued for lack of efficacy and discontinued while not suppressed. |
Adjusted for study and randomization stratification factors, treatment difference of HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL for the pooled data was 0.2% with 95% CI (-1.4%, 1.7%).
Table 18: Proportion of Participants in FLAIR and ATLAS Trials with Plasma HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL at Week 48 for Key Baseline Factors
| Baseline Factors |
FLAIR Monthly Dosing |
ATLAS Monthly Dosing |
CAB plus RPV
(N = 283) n/N (%) |
CAR
(N = 283) n/N (%) |
CAB plus RPV
(N = 308) n/N (%) |
CAR
(N = 308) n/N (%) |
| Baseline CD4+ (cells/mm³) |
| <350 |
0/19 |
1/27 (4%) |
0/23 |
1/27 (4%) |
| ≥350 to <500 |
3/64 (5%) |
0/60 |
2/56 (4%) |
0/60 |
| ≥500 |
3/200 (2%) |
6/196 (3%) |
3/299 (1%) |
2/224 (<1%) |
| Gender |
| Male |
3/220 (1%) |
6/219 (3%) |
3/209 (1%) |
3/204 (1%) |
| Female |
3/63 (5%) |
1/64 (2%) |
2/99 (2%) |
0/104 |
| Race |
| White |
6/216 (3%) |
5/201 (2%) |
3/214 (1%) |
2/207 (<1%) |
| African American/African |
0/47 |
2/56 (4%) |
2/62 (3%) |
1/77 (1%) |
| Heritage Asian/Other |
0/20 |
0/24 |
0/32 |
0/24 |
| Body mass index |
| <30 kg/m² |
3/243 (1%) |
7/246 (3%) |
3/248 (1%) |
1/242 (<1%) |
| ≥30 kg/m² |
3/40 (8%) |
0/37 |
2/60 (3%) |
2/66 (3%) |
| Age (years) |
| <50 |
5/250 (2%) |
6/254 (2%) |
4/242 (2%) |
2/212 (<1%) |
| ≥50 |
1/33 (3%) |
1/29 (3%) |
1/66 (2%) |
1/96 (1%) |
| Baseline antiviral therapy at randomization |
| Protease inhibitor-containing regimen |
0 |
0 |
1/51 (2%) |
0/54 |
| Integrase inhibitor-containing regimen |
6/283 (2%) |
7/283 (2%) |
0/102 |
2/99 (2%) |
| Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-containing regimen |
0 |
0 |
4/155 (3%) |
1/155 (<1%) |
| CAB = Cabotegravir, RPV = Rilpivirine, CAR = Current Antiretroviral Regimen. |
Participants in both the FLAIR and ATLAS trials were virologically suppressed prior to Day 1 or at study entry, respectively, and no clinically relevant change from baseline in CD4+ cell counts was observed.
In FLAIR at Week 96, the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL was 3.2 % for both the cabotegravir plus rilpivirine (n = 283) and current antiretroviral regimen (n = 283) treatment arms; adjusted treatment difference was 0.0% with 95% CI (-2.9%, 2.9%). The proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL was 87% and 89% for the cabotegravir plus rilpivirine and the current antiretroviral regimen arms, respectively; adjusted treatment difference was -2.8% with 95% CI (-8.2%, 2.5%).
Optional Oral Lead-In: FLAIR Extension Phase
In the FLAIR study during the Extension Phase (Week 100 to Week 124), the efficacy of CABENUVA was evaluated in patients who switched (at Week 100) from their current antiretroviral regimen to CABENUVA, with and without an oral lead-in phase. A total of 121 participants chose to start the treatment with oral lead-in and 111 participants chose direct to injection. Participants were not randomized during the Extension Phase. At Week 124, the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL was 0.8% and 0.9% for the oral lead-in and direct to injection groups, respectively. The rates of virologic suppression (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL) were similar in both the oral lead-in (93%) and direct to injection (99%) groups.
Every-2-Month Dosing Trial
The efficacy of CABENUVA dosed every 2 months has been evaluated in 1 Phase 3b randomized, multicenter, parallel-arm, open-label, non-inferiority trial:
- Trial 207966 (ATLAS-2M [NCT03299049]), (n = 1,045): ART-experienced, virologically suppressed participants with HIV-1, including 504 participants from the ATLAS trial (randomized to CAB plus RPV [n = 253] or CAR [n = 251]; prior exposure to cabotegravir plus rilpivirine [n = 391]), were randomized and received a cabotegravir plus rilpivirine regimen administered as injection doses of cabotegravir 400 mg plus rilpivirine 600 mg either monthly or cabotegravir 600 mg plus rilpivirine 900 mg every 2 months. Participants without prior exposure to cabotegravir plus rilpivirine initiated treatment with daily oral lead-in dosing with one 30-mg VOCABRIA (cabotegravir) tablet plus one 25-mg EDURANT (rilpivirine) tablet for at least 4 weeks followed by monthly or every-2-month injections with CABENUVA for an additional 44 weeks.
The primary analysis was conducted after all participants completed their Week 48 visit or discontinued the study prematurely.
At baseline, the median age was 42 years, 27% were female, 27% were non-White, and 6% had a CD4+ cell count <350 cells per mm³; these characteristics were similar between the treatment arms. Participants received either an NNRTI (29%), an integrase inhibitor besides cabotegravir plus rilpivirine (26%), a protease inhibitor (7%), or cabotegravir plus rilpivirine (37%) as their baseline third-agent class prior to randomization.
The primary endpoint of ATLAS-2M was the proportion of participants with a plasma HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL at Week 48.
The primary endpoint and other Week 48 outcomes, including outcomes by key baseline factors, for ATLAS-2M are shown in Tables 19 and 20.
Table 19: Virologic Outcomes of Randomized Treatment in ATLAS 2-M Trial at Week 48
| Virologic Outcomes |
Cabotegravir plus Rilpivirine |
Every-2-Month Dosing
n = 522 |
Monthly Dosing
n = 523 |
| HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mLa |
2% |
1% |
| Treatment difference |
0.8 (95% CI: -0.6%, 2.2%) |
| HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL |
94% |
94% |
| No virologic data at Week 48 window |
4% |
6% |
| Discontinued study due to adverse event or death |
2% |
3% |
| Discontinued for other reasons |
2% |
3% |
| Missing data during window but on study |
0 |
0 |
aIncludes participants who discontinued for lack of efficacy, discontinued while not suppressed.
n = Number of participants in each treatment group, CI = Confidence Interval. |
Table 20: Proportion of Participants in ATLAS 2-M Trial with Plasma HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL at Week 48 for Key Baseline Factors
| Baseline Factors |
Cabotegravir plus Rilpivirine |
Every-2-Month Dosing
(N = 522) n/N (%) |
Monthly Dosing
(N = 523) n/N (%) |
| Baseline CD4+ (cells/mm³) |
| <350 |
1/35 (3%) |
1/27 (4%) |
| ≥350 to <500 |
1/96 (1%) |
0/89 |
| ≥500 |
7/391 (2%) |
4/407 (1%) |
| Gender |
| Male |
4/385 (1%) |
5/380 (1%) |
| Female |
5/137 (4%) |
0/143 |
| Race |
| White |
5/370 (1%) |
5/393 (1%) |
| Black/African American |
4/101 (4%) |
0/90 |
| Asian/Other |
0/51 |
0/40 |
| Body mass index |
| <30 kg/m² |
3/409 (1%) |
3/425 (1%) |
| ≥30 kg/m² |
6/113 (5%) |
2/98 (2%) |
| Age (years) |
| <35 |
4/137 (3%) |
1/145 (1%) |
| 35 to <50 |
3/242 (1%) |
2/239 (1%) |
| ≥50 |
2/143 (1%) |
2/139 (1%) |
| Prior exposure to cabotegravir plus rilpivirine |
| None |
5/327 (2%) |
5/327 (2%) |
| 1 to 24 Weeks |
3/69 (4%) |
0/68 |
| >24 Weeks |
1/126 (1%) |
0/128 |
| Baseline third-agent class |
| Protease inhibitor-containing regimen |
1/40 (3%) |
1/30 (3%) |
| Integrase inhibitor-containing regimen |
3/136 (2%) |
2/141 (1%) |
| NNRTI-containing regimen |
1/151 (1%) |
2/156 (1%) |
| Cabotegravir plus rilpivirine |
4/195 (2%) |
0/196 |
Clinical Trial In Adolescents
Trial 208580 (MOCHA, [NCT03497676])
The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of oral and injectable cabotegravir and oral and injectable rilpivirine were assessed in an ongoing Phase ½ multicenter, open-label, non-comparative study, MOCHA (IMPAACT 2017) [see ADVERSE REACTIONS, CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY].
Cohort 1
Fifty-five virologically suppressed adolescents with HIV-1 aged 12 to younger than 18 years and weighing at least 35 kg were enrolled to 1 of 4 subgroups, 1C (Q4W): cabotegravir monthly dosing, 1C (Q8W): cabotegravir every-2-month dosing, 1R (Q4W): rilpivirine monthly dosing or 1R (Q8W): rilpivirine every-2-month dosing.
In cohort 1C, participants (n = 30) received one 30-mg cabotegravir tablet daily for at least 4 weeks followed by monthly cabotegravir injections for 3 months (Month 1: 600-mg injection, Months 2 and 3: 400-mg injection), or every-2-month cabotegravir injections for 2 months (Months 1 and 2: 600-mg injection), while continuing background antiretroviral therapy. In cohort 1R, participants (n = 25) received one 25-mg rilpivirine tablet daily for at least 4 weeks followed by monthly rilpivirine injections for 3 months (Month 1: 900-mg injection, Months 2 and 3: 600-mg injection), or every-2-month rilpivirine injections for 2 months (Months 1 and 2: 900-mg injection), while continuing background antiretroviral therapy.
At baseline, in cohort 1 (n = 55), the median age of participants was 15.0 years, the median weight was 50.0 kg (range: 37.4, 98.5), 47% were female, 76% were Black/African American, 16% were Asian, 7% were White; and no participant had a CD4+ cell count <350 cells per mm³. At baseline, median CD4+ cell count was 725 cells per mm³ (range: 397 to 1808).
The primary objectives at Week 16, which were to confirm the use of the adult dose through the evaluation of safety and pharmacokinetics in virologically suppressed adolescents with HIV-1, were met enabling the progression of participants to cohort 2 [see ADVERSE REACTIONS, CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY].
Cohort 2
Cohort 2 enrolled eligible participants who had completed cohort 1 as well as eligible participants who had not been previously enrolled in the study. Cohort 2 participants (n = 144) discontinued their background antiretroviral therapy and received one 30-mg cabotegravir tablet plus one 25-mg rilpivirine tablet daily for at least 4 weeks followed by every-2-month cabotegravir injections (Months 1 and 2: 600-mg injection, then 600-mg injection once every 2 months) and rilpivirine injections (Months 1 and 2: 900-mg injection, then 900-mg injection once every 2 months).
At baseline, in cohort 2, the median age of participants was 15.0 years, the median weight was 48.5 kg (range: 35.2, 100.9), 51% were female, 74% were Black/African American, 25% were Asian, 1% was White; and 4 participants had a CD4+ cell count less than 350 cells per mm³. At baseline, median CD4+ cell count was 739.5 cells per mm³ (range: 81 to 1925).
The primary objective at Week 24, which was to confirm the safety of injectable cabotegravir plus injectable rilpivirine in virologically suppressed adolescents with HIV-1, was met [see ADVERSE REACTIONS]. Antiviral activity was assessed as a secondary objective: 139 of the 141 (98.6%) participants with available data remained virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL) at Week 24. The median change from baseline in CD4+ cell count at Week 24 was -36.0 cells per mm³.