CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism Of Action
Azithromycin is a macrolide
antibacterial drug. [see Microbiology]
Pharmacodynamics
Based on animal models of
infection, the antibacterial activity of azithromycin appears to correlate with
the ratio of area under the concentration-time curve to minimum inhibitory
concentration (AUC/MIC) for certain pathogens (S. pneumoniae and S.
aureus). The principal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameter best
associated with clinical and microbiological cure has not been elucidated in
clinical trials with azithromycin.
Cardiac Electrophysiology
QTc interval prolongation was
studied in a randomized, placebo-controlled parallel trial in 116 healthy subjects
who received either chloroquine (1000 mg) alone or in combination with oral
azithromycin (500 mg, 1000 mg, and 1500 mg once daily). Co-administration of
azithromycin increased the QTc interval in a dose- and concentration- dependent
manner. In comparison to chloroquine alone, the maximum mean (95% upper
confidence bound) increases in QTcF were 5 (10) ms, 7 (12) ms and 9 (14) ms
with the co-administration of 500 mg, 1000 mg and 1500 mg azithromycin,
respectively.
Since the mean Cmax of
azithromycin following a 500 mg IV dose given over 1 hr is higher than the mean
Cmax of azithromycin following the administration of a 1500 mg oral dose, it is
possible that QTc may be prolonged to a greater extent with IV azithromycin at
close proximity to a one hour infusion of 500 mg.
Pharmacokinetics
In patients hospitalized with
community-acquired pneumonia receiving single daily one-hour intravenous
infusions for 2 to 5 days of 500 mg azithromycin at a concentration of 2 mg/mL,
the mean Cmax ± S.D. achieved was 3.63 ± 1.60 mcg/mL, while the 24-hour trough
level was 0.20 ± 0.15 mcg/mL, and the AUC was 9.60 ± 4.80 mcg·hr/mL.
The mean Cmax, 24-hour trough
and AUC24 values were 1.14 ± 0.14 mcg/mL, 0.18 ± 0.02 mcg/mL, and 8.03 ±0.86
mcg•hr/mL, respectively, in normal volunteers receiving a 3-hour intravenous
infusion of 500 mg azithromycin at a concentration of 1 mg/mL. Similar pharmacokinetic
values were obtained in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia
who received the same 3-hour dosage regimen for 2–5 days.
Infusion Concentration, Duration |
Time after starting the infusion (hr) |
0.5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
8 |
12 |
24 |
2 mg/mL, 1 hr* |
2.98 ± 1.12 |
3.63 ± 1.73 |
0.60 ± 0.31 |
0.40 ± 0.23 |
0.33 ± 0.16 |
0.26 ± 0.14 |
0.27± 0.15 |
0.20 ± 0.12 |
0.20 ± 0.15 |
1 mg/mL, 3 hr† |
0.91 ± 0.13 |
1.02 ± 0.11 |
1.14 ± 0.13 |
1.13 ± 0.16 |
0.32 ± 0.05 |
0.28 ± 0.04 |
0.27± 0.03 |
0.22 ± 0.02 |
0.18 ± 0.02 |
* 500 mg (2 mg/mL) for 2–5 days in community-acquired
pneumonia patients.
† 500 mg (1 mg/mL) for 5 days in healthy subjects. |
Comparison of the plasma pharmacokinetic parameters following the 1st and 5th daily doses of 500 mg intravenous
azithromycin showed only an 8% increase in Cmax but a 61% increase in AUC24
reflecting a threefold rise in C24 trough levels.
Following single-oral doses of
500 mg azithromycin (two 250 mg capsules) to 12 healthy volunteers, Cmax,
trough level, and AUC24 were reported to be 0.41 mcg/mL, 0.05 mcg/mL, and 2.6
mcg·hr/mL, respectively. These oral values are approximately 38%, 83%, and 52%
of the values observed following a single 500-mg I.V. 3-hour infusion (Cmax:
1.08 mcg/mL, trough: 0.06 mcg/mL, and AUC24: 5.0 mcg·hr/mL). Thus, plasma
concentrations are higher following the intravenous regimen throughout the
24-hour interval.
Distribution
The serum protein binding of
azithromycin is variable in the concentration range approximating human exposure,
decreasing from 51% at 0.02 mcg/mL to 7% at 2 mcg/mL.
Tissue concentrations have not
been obtained following intravenous infusions of azithromycin, but following
oral administration in humans azithromycin has been shown to penetrate into
tissues, including skin, lung, tonsil, and cervix.
Tissue levels were determined
following a single oral dose of 500 mg azithromycin in 7 gynecological patients.
Approximately 17 hr after dosing, azithromycin concentrations were 2.7 mcg/g in
ovarian tissue, 3.5 mcg/g in uterine tissue, and 3.3 mcg/g in salpinx.
Following a regimen of 500 mg on the first day followed by 250 mg daily for 4
days, concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid were less than 0.01 mcg/mL in
the presence of non-inflamed meninges.
Metabolism
In vitro and in vivo studies to
assess the metabolism of azithromycin have not been performed.
Elimination
Plasma concentrations of
azithromycin following single 500 mg oral and IV doses declined in a polyphasic
pattern with a mean apparent plasma clearance of 630 mL/min and terminal elimination
halflife of 68 hr. The prolonged terminal half-life is thought to be due to
extensive uptake and subsequent release of drug from tissues.
In a multiple-dose study in 12
normal volunteers utilizing a 500 mg (1 mg/mL) one-hour intravenousdosage regimen
for five days, the amount of administered azithromycin dose excreted in urine
in 24 hr was about 11% after the 1st dose and 14% after the 5th dose. These
values are greater than the reported 6% excreted unchanged in urine after oral
administration of azithromycin. Biliary excretion is a major route of
elimination for unchanged drug, following oral administration.
Specific Populations
Renal Insufficiency
Azithromycin pharmacokinetics
were investigated in 42 adults (21 to 85 years of age) with varying degrees of
renal impairment. Following the oral administration of a single 1,000 mg dose
of azithromycin, mean Cmax and AUC0-120 increased by 5.1% and 4.2%,
respectively in subjects with mild to moderate renal impairment (GFR 10 to 80
mL/min) compared to subjects with normal renal function (GFR > 80 mL/min).
The mean C and AUC increased 61% and 35%, respectively in subjects with severe
renal impairment (GFR < 10 mL/min) compared to subjects with normal renal
function (GFR > 80 mL/min).
Hepatic Insufficiency
The pharmacokinetics of
azithromycin in subjects with hepatic impairment has not been established.
Gender
There are no significant
differences in the disposition of azithromycin between male and female subjects.
No dosage adjustment is recommended based on gender.
Geriatric Patients
Pharmacokinetic studies with
intravenous azithromycin have not been performed in older volunteers. Pharmacokinetics
of azithromycin following oral administration in older volunteers (65–85 years
old) were similar to those in younger volunteers (18–40 years old) for the
5-day therapeutic regimen. [see Geriatric Use]
Pediatric Patients
Pharmacokinetic studies with
intravenous azithromycin have not been performed in children.
Drug-drug Interactions
Drug interaction studies were
performed with oral azithromycin and other drugs likely to be coadministered. The
effects of co-administration of azithromycin on the pharmacokinetics of other
drugs are shown in Table 1 and the effects of other drugs on the
pharmacokinetics of azithromycin are shown in Table 2.
Co-administration of azithromycin
at therapeutic doses had a modest effect on the pharmacokinetics of the drugs
listed in Table 1. No dosage adjustment of drugs listed in Table 1 is
recommended when coadministered with azithromycin.
Co-administration of
azithromycin with efavirenz or fluconazole had a modest effect on the pharmacokinetics
of azithromycin. Nelfinavir significantly increased the C and AUC of azithromycin.
No dosage adjustment of azithromycin is recommended when administered with
drugs listed in Table 2. [see DRUG INTERACTIONS]
Table 1: Drug Interactions :
Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Co-administered Drugs in the Presence of
Azithromycin
Co- administered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Azithromycin |
n |
Ratio (with/without azithromycin) of Coadministered Drug Pharmacokinetic Parameters (90% CI);
No Effect = 1.00 |
Mean Cmax |
Mean AUC |
Atorvastatin |
10 mg/day for 8 days |
500 mg/day orally on days 68 |
12 |
0.83 (0.63 to 1.08) |
1.01 (0.81 to 1.25) |
Carbamazepine |
200 mg/day for 2 days, then 200 mg twice a day for 18 days |
500 mg/day orally for days 16-18 |
7 |
0.97 (0.88 to 1.06) |
0.96 (0.88 to 1.06) |
Cetirizine |
20 mg/day for 11 days |
500 mg orally on day 7, then 250 mg/day on days 8-11 |
14 |
1.03 (0.93 to 1.14) |
1.02 (0.92 to 1.13) |
Didanosine |
200 mg orally twice a day for 21 days |
1,200 mg/day orally on days 8-21 |
6 |
1.44 (0.85 to 2.43) |
1.14 (0.83 to 1.57) |
Efavirenz |
400 mg/day for 7 days |
600 mg orally on day 7 |
14 |
1.04* |
0.95* |
Fluconazole |
200 mg orally single dose |
1,200 mg orally single dose |
18 |
1.04 (0.98 to 1.11) |
1.01 (0.97 to 1.05) |
Indinavir |
800 mg three times a day for 5 days |
1,200 mg orally on day 5 |
18 |
0.96 (0.86 to 1.08) |
0.90 (0.81 to 1.00) |
Midazolam |
15 mg orally on day 3 |
500 mg/day orally for 3 days |
12 |
1.27 (0.89 to 1.81) |
1.26 (1.01 to 1.56) |
Nelfinavir |
750 mg three times a day for 11 days |
1,200 mg orally on day 9 |
14 |
0.90 (0.81 to 1.01) |
0.85 (0.78 to 0.93) |
Sildenafil |
100 mg on days 1 and 4 |
500 mg/day orally for 3 days |
12 |
1.16 (0.86 to 1.57) |
0.92 (0.75 to 1.12) |
Theophylline |
4 mg/kg IV on days 1, 11, 25 |
500 mg orally on day 7, 250 mg/day on days 8-11 |
10 |
1.19 (1.02 to 1.40) |
1.02 (0.86 to 1.22) |
Theophylline |
300 mg orally BID *15 days |
500 mg orally on day 6, then 250 mg/day on days 7-10 |
8 |
1.09 (0.92 to 1.29) |
1.08 (0.89 to 1.31) |
Triazolam |
0.125 mg on day 2 |
500 mg orally on day 1, then 250 mg/day on day 2 |
12 |
1.06* |
1.02* |
Trimethoprim/ Sulfamethoxazole |
160 mg/800 mg/day orally for 7 days |
1,200 mg orally on day 7 |
12 |
0.85 (0.75 to 0.97)/ 0.90 (0.78 to 1.03) |
0.87 (0.80 to 0.95/ 0.96 (0.88 to 1.03) |
Zidovudine |
500 mg/day orally for 21 days |
600 mg/day orally for 14 days |
5 |
1.12 (0.42 to 3.02) |
0.94 (0.52 to 1.70) |
Zidovudine |
500 mg/day orally for 21 days |
1,200 mg/day orally for 14 days |
4 |
1.31 (0.43 to 3.97) |
1.30 (0.69 to 2.43) |
*-90% Confidence interval not reported |
Table 2: Drug Interactions :
Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Azithromycin in the Presence of Coadministered
Drugs. [see DRUG INTERACTIONS]
Co-administered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Azithromycin |
n |
Ratio (with/without co-administered drug) of Azithromycin Pharmacokinetic Parameters
(90% CI); No
Effect = 1.00 |
Mean Cmax |
Mean AUC |
Efavirenz |
400 mg/day for 7 days |
600 mg orally on day 7 |
14 |
1.22 (1.04 to 1.42) |
0.92* |
Fluconazole |
200 mg orally single dose |
1,200 mg orally single dose |
18 |
0.82 (0.66 to 1.02) |
1.07 (0.94 to 1.22) |
Nelfinavir |
750 mg three times a day for 11 days |
1,200 mg orally on day 9 |
14 |
2.36 (1.77 to 3.15) |
2.12 (1.80 to 2.50) |
*- 90% Confidence interval not reported |
Microbiology
Mechanism Of Action
Azithromycin acts by binding to
the 50S ribosomal subunit of susceptible microorganisms and, thus, interfering
with microbial protein synthesis. Nucleic acid synthesis is not affected.
Cross Resistance
Azithromycin demonstrates
cross-resistance with erythromycin-resistant Gram-positive isolates.
Azithromycin has been shown to
be active against most isolates of the following bacteria, both in vitro and in
clinical infections as described in [see INDICATIONS AND USAGE].
Gram-positive Bacteria
Staphylococcus aureus
Streptococcus pneumoniae
Gram-negative Bacteria
Haemophilus influenzae
Moraxella catarrhalis
Neisseria gonorrhoeae
Legionella pneumophila
Other Bacteria
Chlamydophila pneumoniae
Chlamydia trachomatis
Mycoplasma hominis
Mycoplasma pneumoniae
The following in vitro data are
available, but their clinical significance is unknown. Azithromycin exhibits in
vitro minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 2.0 mcg/mL or less against
most ( ≥ 90%) isolates of the following bacteria; however, the safety and
effectiveness of azithromycin in treating clinical infections due to these
bacteria have not been established in adequate and well-controlled trials.
Aerobic Gram-positive
Bacteria
Streptococci (Groups C, F, G)
Viridans group streptococci
Gram-negative Bacteria
Bordetella pertussis
Anaerobic Bacteria
Peptostreptococcus
species
Prevotella bivia
Other Bacteria
Ureaplasma urealyticum
Susceptibility Testing Methods
When available, clinical
microbiology laboratory should provide the results of in vitro susceptibility test
results for antimicrobial products used in resident hospitals to the physician
as periodic reports that describe the susceptibility profile of nosocomial and
community-acquired pathogens. These reports should aid the physician in
selecting an antibacterial drug product for treatment.
Dilution Techniques
Quantitative methods are used to
determine minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs). These MICs provide
estimates of the susceptibility of bacteria to antimicrobial compounds. The
MICs should be determined using a standardized test method1,2
(broth, and/or agar). The MIC values should be interpreted according to
criteria provided in Table 3.
Diffusion Techniques
Quantitative methods that
require measurement of zone diameters can provide reproducible estimates of the
susceptibility of bacteria to antimicrobial compounds. The zone size provides
an estimate of the susceptibility of bacteria to antimicrobial compounds. The
zone size should be determined using standardized methods2,3. This
procedure uses paper disk impregnated with 15 mcg azithromycin to test the
susceptibility of bacteria to azithromycin. The disk diffusion interpretive
criteria are provided in Table 3.
Table 3: Susceptibility Interpretive Criteria for
Azithromycin
Pathogen |
Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations ( mcg/mL) |
Disk Diffusion (zone diameters in mm) |
S |
I |
R |
S |
I |
R |
Haemophilus influenzae.* |
≤ 4 |
-- |
-- |
≥ 12 |
-- |
-- |
Staphylococcus aureus |
≤ 2 |
4 |
> 8 |
≥ 18 |
14-17 |
≤ 13 |
Streptococci including S. pneumoniae |
≤ 0.5 |
1 |
> 2 |
≥ 18 |
14-17 |
≤ 13 |
*Insufficient information is available to determine
Intermediate or Resistant interpretive criteria |
A report of “Susceptible” indicates that the pathogen is likely to inhibit growth
of the pathogen if the antimicrobial compound reaches the concentration at the
infection site necessary to inhibit growth of the pathogen. A report of
“Intermediate” indicates that the result should be considered
equivocal, and if the microorganism is not fully susceptible to alternative
clinically feasible drugs, the test should be repeated. This category implies
possible clinical applicability in body sites where the drug is physiologically
concentrated. This category also provides a buffer zone that prevents small uncontrolled
technical factors from causing major discrepancies in interpretation. A report
of “Resistant” indicates that the antimicrobial is not likely to
inhibit growth of the pathogen if the antimicrobial compound reaches the
concentrations usually achievable at the infection site; other therapy should
be selected.
Quality Control
Standardized susceptibility test
procedures require the use of laboratory controls to monitor and ensure the
accuracy and precision of supplies and reagents used in the assay, and the
techniques of the individuals performing the test1,2,3. Standard
azithromycin powder should provide the following range of MIC values provided
in Table 4. For the diffusion technique using the 15-mcg azithromycin disk the criteria
provided in Table 4 should be achieved.
Table 4: Acceptable Quality Control Ranges for Susceptibility
Testing
Quality Control Organism |
Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (mcg/mL) |
Disk Diffusion (zone diameters in mm) |
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 |
Not Applicable |
21-26 |
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 |
0.5-2 |
Not Applicable |
Haemophilus Influenzae ATCC 49247 |
1-4 |
13-21 |
Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619 |
0.06-0.25 |
19-25 |
ATCC = American Type Culture
Collection |
The ability to correlate MIC
values and plasma drug levels is difficult as azithromycin concentrates in macrophages
and tissues. [see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY]
Animal Toxicology And/Or Pharmacology
Phospholipidosis (intracellular
phospholipid accumulation) has been observed in some tissues of mice, rats, and
dogs given multiple oral doses of azithromycin. It has been demonstrated in
numerous organ systems (e.g., eye, dorsal root ganglia, liver, gallbladder,
kidney, spleen, and/or pancreas) in dogs and rats treated with azithromycin at
doses which, expressed on the basis of body surface area, are similar to or
less than the highest recommended adult human dose. This effect has been shown
to be reversible after cessation of azithromycin treatment. Based on the
pharmacokinetic data, phospholipidosis has been seen in the rat (50 mg/kg/day
dose) at the observed maximal plasma concentration of 1.3 mcg/mL (1.6 times the
observed Cmax of 0.821 mcg /mL at the adult dose of 2 g.) Similarly, it has
been shown in the dog (10 mg/kg/day dose) at the observed maximal serum
concentration of 1 mcg /mL (1.2 times the observed Cmax of 0.821 mcg /mL at the
adult dose of 2 g).
Phospholipidosis was also
observed in neonatal rats dosed for 18 days at 30 mg/kg/day, which is less than
the pediatric dose of 60 mg/kg based on body surface area. It was not observed
in neonatal rats treated for 10 days at 40 mg/kg/day with mean maximal serum
concentrations of 1.86 mcg /ml, approximately 1.5 times the Cmax of 1.27 mcg/ml
at the pediatric dose. Phospholipidosis has been observed in neonatal dogs (10
mg/kg/day) at maximum mean whole blood concentrations of 3.54 mcg /ml, approximately
3 times the pediatric dose Cmax. The significance of the findings for animals
and for humans is unknown.
Clinical Studies
Community-Acquired Pneumonia
In a controlled trial of
community-acquired pneumonia performed in the U.S., azithromycin (500 mg as a single
daily dose by the intravenous route for 2 to 5 days, followed by 500 mg/day by
the oral route to complete 7 to 10 days therapy) was compared to cefuroxime
(2250 mg/day in three divided doses by the intravenous route for 2 to 5 days
followed by 1000 mg/day in two divided doses by the oral route to complete 7 to
10 days therapy), with or without erythromycin. For the 291 patients who were
evaluable for clinical efficacy, the clinical outcome rates, i.e., cure,
improved, and success (cure + improved) among the 277 patients seen at 10 to 14
days post-therapy were as follows:
Clinical Outcome |
Azithromycin |
Comparator |
Cure |
46% |
44% |
Improved |
32% |
30% |
Success (Cure + Improved) |
78% |
74% |
In a separate, uncontrolled clinical and microbiological
trial performed in the U.S., 94 patients with community-acquired pneumonia who
received azithromycin in the same regimen were evaluable for clinical efficacy.
The clinical outcome rates, i.e., cure, improved, and success (cure + improved)
among the 84 patients seen at 10 to 14 days post-therapy were as follows:
Clinical Outcome |
Azithromycin |
Cure |
60% |
Improved |
29% |
Success (Cure + Improved) |
89% |
Microbiological determinations in both trials were made at the pre-treatment visit and, where applicable, were
reassessed at later visits. Serological testing was done on baseline and final
visit specimens. The following combined presumptive bacteriological eradication
rates were obtained from the evaluable groups:
Combined Bacteriological Eradication Rates for Azithromycin:
(at last completed visit) |
Azithromycin |
S. pneumonia |
64/67 (96%)* |
H. influenzae |
41/43 (95%) |
M. catarrhalis |
9/10 (90%) |
S. aureus |
9/10 (90%) |
*Nineteen of twenty-four
patients (79%) with positive blood cultures for S. pneumoniae were cured
(intent-to-treat analysis) with eradication of the pathogen. |
The presumed bacteriological
outcomes at 10 to 14 days post-therapy for patients treated with azithromycin
with evidence (serology and/or culture) of atypical pathogens for both trials
were as follows:
Evidence of Infection |
Total |
Cure |
Improved |
Cure + Improved |
Mycoplasma pneumoniae |
18 |
11 (61%) |
5 (28%) |
16 (89%) |
Chlumyuiu pneumoniae |
34 |
15 (44%) |
13 (38%) |
28 (82%) |
Legionella pneumophila |
16 |
5 (31%) |
8 (50%) |
13 (81%) |
REFERENCES
1. Clinical and Laboratory
Standards Institute (CLSI) Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests
for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically: Approved Standard-Ninth Edition. CLSI
Document M07-A9. CLSI, 950 West Valley Rd., Suite 2500, Wayne, PA 19087, 2012.
2. Clinical and Laboratory
Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility
Testing; Twenty-third Informational Supplement, CLSI document M100-S23. CLSI document
M100-S23, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 950 West Valley Road,
Suite 2500, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087, USA, 2013.
3. Clinical and Laboratory
Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Diffusion
Susceptibility Tests; Approved Standard – Eleventh Edition CLSI document M02-A11,
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 950 West Valley Road, Suite 2500,
Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087, USA, 2012.