CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism Of Action
Omeprazole belongs to a class of antisecretory compounds, the substituted benzimidazoles, that suppress gastric acid secretion by specific inhibition of the H+/K+ ATPase enzyme system at the secretory surface of the gastric parietal cell. Because this enzyme system is regarded as the acid (proton) pump within the gastric mucosa, omeprazole has been characterized as a gastric acid-pump inhibitor, in that it blocks the final step of acid production. This effect is dose related and leads to inhibition of both basal and stimulated acid secretion irrespective of the stimulus.
Pharmacodynamics
Antisecretory Activity
Results from a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) study of the antisecretory effect of repeated once-daily dosing of 40 mg and 20 mg of ZEGERID for oral suspension in healthy subjects are shown in Table 8 below.
Table 8: Effect of ZEGERID for Oral Suspension on Intragastric pH, Day 7
Parameter |
Once Daily Dosage of ZEGERID for Oral Suspension |
40 mg omeprazole and 1,680 mg sodium bicarbonate (n = 24) |
20 mg omeprazole and 1,680 mg sodium bicarbonate (n = 28) |
% Decrease from Baseline for Integrated Gastric Acidity (mmol•hr/L) |
84% |
82% |
Coefficient of Variation |
20% |
24% |
% Time Gastric pH > 4 1 (Hours)1 |
77% (18.6 h) |
51% (12.2 h) |
Coefficient of Variation |
27% |
43% |
Median pH |
5.2 |
4.2 |
Coefficient of Variation |
17% |
37% |
Note: Values represent medians. All parameters were measured over a 24-hour period. |
1. P < 0.05 20 mgvs. 40 mg |
Results from a separate PK/PD study of antisecretory effect on repeated once-daily dosing of 40 mg/1,100 mg and 20 mg/1,100 mg of ZEGERID capsules in healthy subjects show similar effects in general on the above three PD parameters as those for ZEGERID for oral suspension 40 mg/1,680 mg and 20 mg/1,680 mg, respectively.
The antisecretory effect lasts longer than would be expected from the very short (1 hour) plasma half-life, apparently due to irreversible binding to the parietal H+/K+ ATPase enzyme.
Enterochromaffin-Like (ECL) Cell Effects
Human gastric biopsy specimens have been obtained from more than 3000 patients treated with omeprazole in long-term clinical trials. The incidence of ECL cell hyperplasia in these studies increased with time; however, no case of ECL cell carcinoids, dysplasia, or neoplasia has been found in these patients. These studies are of insufficient duration and size to rule out the possible influence of long-term administration of omeprazole on the development of any premalignant or malignant conditions.
Serum Gastrin Effects
In studies involving more than 200 patients, serum gastrin levels increased during the first 1 to 2 weeks of once-daily administration of therapeutic doses of omeprazole in parallel with inhibition of acid secretion. No further increase in serum gastrin occurred with continued treatment. In comparison with histamine H2-receptor antagonists, the median increases produced by 20 mg doses of omeprazole were higher (1.3 to 3.6-fold vs. 1.1-to 1.8-fold increase). Gastrin values returned to pretreatment levels, usually within 1 to 2 weeks after discontinuation of therapy.
Increased gastrin causes enterochromaffin-like cell hyperplasia and increased serum Chromogranin A (CgA) levels. The increased CgA levels may cause false positive results in diagnostic investigations for neuroendocrine tumors [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS].
Other Effects
Systemic effects of omeprazole in the central nervous system (CNS), cardiovascular and respiratory systems have not
been found to date. Omeprazole, given in oral doses of 30 or 40 mg for 2 to 4 weeks, had no effect on thyroid function,
carbohydrate metabolism, or circulating levels of parathyroid hormone, cortisol, estradiol, testosterone, prolactin,
cholecystokinin or secretin.
No effect on gastric emptying of the solid and liquid components of a test meal was demonstrated after a single dose of omeprazole 90 mg. In healthy subjects, a single intravenous dose of omeprazole (0.35 mg/kg) had no effect on intrinsic factor secretion. No systematic dose-dependent effect has been observed on basal or stimulated pepsin output in humans. However, when intragastric pH is maintained at 4.0 or above, basal pepsin output is low, and pepsin activity is decreased.
As do other agents that elevate intragastric pH, omeprazole administered for 14 days in healthy subjects produced a significant increase in the intragastric concentrations of viable bacteria. The pattern of the bacterial species was unchanged from that commonly found in saliva. All changes resolved within three days of stopping treatment.
The course of Barrett’s esophagus in 106 patients was evaluated in a U.S. double-blind controlled study of omeprazole 40 mg twice daily for 12 months followed by 20 mg twice daily for 12 months or ranitidine 300 mg twice daily for 24 months. No clinically significant impact on Barrett’s mucosa by antisecretory therapy was observed. Although neosquamous epithelium developed during antisecretory therapy, complete elimination of Barrett’s mucosa was not achieved. No significant difference was observed between treatment groups in development of dysplasia in Barrett’s mucosa, and no patient developed esophageal carcinoma during treatment. No significant differences between treatment groups were observed in development of ECL cell hyperplasia, corpus atrophic gastritis, corpus intestinal metaplasia, or colon polyps exceeding 3 mm in diameter.
Pharmacokinetics
Absorption
Tables 9 and 10 show the systemic exposures and the time reach peak concentration (Tmax) of omeprazole in healthy subjects following administration of ZEGERID capsules and oral suspension, respectively, on an empty stomach one hour prior to a meal.
Table 9: Arithmetic Mean (CV%) of the Systemic Exposures (Cmax, AUC) and Tmax of Omeprazole after a Single Oral Dose and Multiple Once Daily Doses of ZEGERID Capsules
|
20 mg ZEGERID capsules |
40 mg ZEGERID capsules |
Day 1 |
Day 7 |
% Change (Day 7/Day 1) |
Day 1 |
Day 7 |
% Change (Day 7/Day 1) |
Cmax (ng/mL) |
498.1 (50.9) |
679.8 (44.0) |
36 |
1154 (53.0) |
1526 (48.7) |
32 |
Tmax (hr) [min – max] |
0.61
[0.25-1.5] |
0.82
[0.25-1.5] |
n.a. |
0.56
[0.25-1.5] |
0.97
[0.25-3.5] |
n.a. |
AUC0-inf * (ng•hr/mL) |
509.7 (60.5) |
1029 (67.9) |
102 |
1882 (120) |
3866 (83.3) |
105 |
n.a.: not applicable
* AUC0-24h was used on Day 7 |
Table 10: Arithmetic Mean (CV%) of the Systemic Exposures (Cmax, AUC) and Tmax of Omeprazole after a Single Oral Dose and Multiple Once Daily Doses of ZEGERID Oral Suspension.
|
20 mg ZEGERID oral suspension |
40 mg ZEGERID oral suspension |
Day 1 |
Day 7 |
% Change (Day 7/Day 1) |
Day 1 |
Day 7 |
% Change (Day 7/Day 1) |
Cmax (ng/mL) |
671.9 (43.8) |
902.2 (39.6) |
34 |
1412 (43.7) |
1954 (33.5) |
38 |
Tmax (hr) [min – max] |
0.50 [0.17-1.5] |
0.47 [0.17-1.0] |
n.a. |
0.44 [0.17-1.0] |
0.58 [0.25-1.0] |
n.a. |
AUC0-inf * (ng•hr/mL) |
825.4 (71.9) |
1449 (61.7) |
76 |
2228 (107) |
4692 (60.5) |
111 |
n.a.: not applicable
* AUC0-24h was used on Day 7 |
Following single or repeated once-daily dosing, peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) of omeprazole from ZEGERID were approximately proportional from 20 to 40 mg doses. A greater than dose proportional increase in mean steady-state AUC (more than three-fold increase on Day 7) was observed when doubling the dose to 40 mg. The bioavailability of omeprazole from ZEGERID increases upon repeated administration. The percent changes in Cmax and AUC between steady-state (Day 7) and single dose (Day 1) indicate omeprazole is a time-dependent autoinhibitor of CYP2C19.
When ZEGERID for oral suspension 40 mg was administered in a two-dose loading regimen, the omeprazole AUC(0-inf) (ng•hr/mL) was 1665 after Dose 1 and 3356 after Dose 2, while Tmax was approximately 30 minutes for both Dose 1 and Dose 2.
When ZEGERID for oral suspension 40 mg or ZEGERID capsule 40 mg is administered one hour after a meal, the omeprazole AUC is reduced by approximately 27% and 22%, respectively, relative to administration one hour prior to a meal [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION].
Distribution
Omeprazole is bound to plasma proteins. Protein binding is approximately 95%.
Elimination
Metabolism
Omeprazole is extensively metabolized by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system. The major part of its metabolism is dependent on the polymorphically expressed CYP2C19 [see Pharmacogenomics], responsible for the formation of hydroxyomeprazole, the major metabolite in plasma. The remaining part is dependent on another specific isoform, CYP3A4, responsible for the formation of omeprazole sulphone.
The mean plasma omeprazole half-life following administration of ZEGERID capsule or ZEGERID oral suspension in healthy subjects is approximately 1 hour (range 0.4 to 4.2 hours), and the total body clearance is 500 to 600 mL/min.
Excretion
Following single-dose oral administration of a buffered solution of omeprazole, the majority of the dose (about 77%) is eliminated in urine as at least six metabolites. Two metabolites have been identified as hydroxyomeprazole and the corresponding carboxylic acid. The remainder of the dose was recoverable in feces. This implies a significant biliary excretion of the metabolites of omeprazole. Three metabolites have been identified in plasma – the sulfide and sulfone derivatives of omeprazole, and hydroxyomeprazole. These metabolites have very little or no antisecretory activity.
Specific Populations
Geriatric Patients
The elimination rate of omeprazole was somewhat decreased in the elderly, and bioavailability was increased. Omeprazole was 76% bioavailable when a single 40 mg oral dose of omeprazole (buffered solution) was administered to healthy elderly subjects versus 58% in young subjects given the same dose. Nearly 70% of the dose was recovered in urine as metabolites of omeprazole, and no unchanged drug was detected. The plasma clearance of omeprazole was 250 mL/min (about half that of young subjects), and its plasma half-life averaged one hour, similar to that of young healthy subjects.
Male And Female Patients
There are no known differences in the absorption or excretion of omeprazole between males and females.
Racial Or Ethnic Groups [See Pharmacogenomics]
Patients with Renal Impairment
In patients with chronic renal impairment (creatinine clearance between 10 and 62 mL/min/1.73 m2), the disposition of omeprazole was very similar to that in healthy subjects, although there was a slight increase in bioavailability. Because urinary excretion is a primary route of excretion of omeprazole metabolites, their elimination slowed in proportion to the decreased creatinine clearance. This increase in bioavailability is not considered to be clinically meaningful.
Patients with Hepatic Impairment
In patients with chronic hepatic disease classified as Child-Pugh Class A (n=3), B (n=4) and C (n=1), the bioavailability of omeprazole increased to approximately 100% compared to healthy subjects, reflecting decreased first-pass effect, and the plasma half-life of the drug increased to nearly 3 hours compared to the in healthy subjects of 0.5 to 1 hour. Plasma clearance averaged 70 mL/min, compared to a value of 500 to 600 mL/min in healthy subjects [see Use In Specific Populations].
Drug Interactions Studies
Effect Of Omeprazole On Other Drugs
Omeprazole is a time-dependent inhibitor of CYP2C19 and can increase the systemic exposure of co-administered drugs that are CYP2C19 substrates. In addition, administration of omeprazole increases intragastric pH and can alter the systemic exposure of certain drugs that exhibit pH-dependent solubility [see DRUG INTERACTIONS].
Antiretrovirals
For some antiretroviral drugs, such as rilpivirine, atazanavir and nelfinavir, decreased serum concentrations have been reported when given together with omeprazole [see DRUG INTERACTIONS].
Rilpivirine
Following multiple doses of rilpivirine (150 mg, daily) and omeprazole (20 mg, daily), AUC was decreased by 40%, Cmax by 40%, and Cmin by 33% for rilpivirine.
Nelfinavir
Following multiple doses of nelfinavir (1250 mg, twice daily) and omeprazole (40 mg daily), AUC was decreased by 36% and 92%, Cmax by 37% and 89% and Cmin by 39% and 75% respectively for nelfinavir and M8.
Atazanavir
Following multiple doses of atazanavir (400 mg, daily) and omeprazole (40 mg, daily, 2 hours before atazanavir), AUC was decreased by 94%, Cmax by 96%, and Cmin by 95%.
Saquinavir
Following multiple dosing of saquinavir/ritonavir (1000/100 mg) twice daily for 15 days with omeprazole 40 mg daily co-administered days 11 to 15.
AUC was increased by 82%, Cmax by 75%, and Cmin by 106%. The mechanism behind this interaction is not fully elucidated. Therefore, clinical and laboratory monitoring for saquinavir toxicity is recommended during concurrent use with PRILOSEC.
Clopidogrel
In a crossover clinical study, 72 healthy subjects were administered clopidogrel (300 mg loading dose followed by 75 mg per day) alone and with omeprazole (80 mg at the same time as clopidogrel) for 5 days. The exposure to the active metabolite of clopidogrel was decreased by 46% (Day 1) and 42% (Day 5) when clopidogrel and omeprazole were administered together.
Results from another crossover study in healthy subjects showed a similar pharmacokinetic interaction between clopidogrel (300 mg loading dose/75 mg daily maintenance dose) and omeprazole 80 mg daily when coadministered for 30 days. Exposure to the active metabolite of clopidogrel was reduced by 41% to 46% over this time period.
In another study, 72 healthy subjects were given the same doses of clopidogrel and 80 mg omeprazole, but the drugs were administered 12 hours apart; the results were similar, indicating that administering clopidogrel and omeprazole at different times does not prevent their interaction [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS, DRUG INTERACTIONS].
Mycophenolate Mofetil
Administration of omeprazole 20 mg twice daily for 4 days and a single 1000 mg dose of MMF approximately one hour after the last dose of omeprazole to 12 healthy subjects in a crossover study resulted in a 52% reduction in the Cmax and 23% reduction in the AUC of MPA [see DRUG INTERACTIONS].
Cilostazol
Omeprazole acts as an inhibitor of CYP2C19. Omeprazole, given in doses of 40 mg daily for one week to 20 healthy subjects in cross-over study, increased Cmax and AUC of cilostazol by 18% and 26% respectively. The Cmax and AUC of one of the active metabolites, 3,4-dihydro-cilostazol, which has 4-7 times the activity of cilostazol, were increased by 29% and 69%, respectively. Co-administration of cilostazol with omeprazole is expected to increase concentrations of cilostazol and the above mentioned active metabolite [see DRUG INTERACTIONS].
Diazepam
Concomitant administration of omeprazole 20 mg once daily and diazepam 0.1 mg/kg given intravenously resulted in 27% decrease in clearance and 36% increase in diazepam half-life [see DRUG INTERACTIONS].
Digoxin
Concomitant administration of omeprazole 20 mg once daily and digoxin in healthy subjects increased the bioavailability of digoxin by 10% (30% in two subjects) [see DRUG INTERACTIONS].
Effect Of Other Drugs On Omeprazole
Voriconazole
Concomitant administration of omeprazole and voriconazole (a combined inhibitor of CYP2C19 and CYP3A4) resulted in more than doubling of the omeprazole exposure. When voriconazole (400 mg every 12 hours for one day, followed by 200 mg once daily for 6 days) was given with omeprazole (40 mg once daily for 7 days) to healthy subjects, the steady-state Cmax and AUC0-24 of omeprazole significantly increased: an average of 2 times (90% CI: 1.8, 2.6) and 4 times (90%
CI: 3.3, 4.4), respectively, as compared to when omeprazole was given without voriconazole [see DRUG INTERACTIONS].
Pharmacogenomics
CYP2C19, a polymorphic enzyme, is involved in the metabolism of omeprazole. The CYP2C19*1 allele is fully functional while the CYP2C19*2 and *3 alleles are nonfunctional. There are other alleles associated with no or reduced enzymatic function. Patients carrying two fully functional alleles are extensive metabolizers and those carrying two loss-of-function alleles are poor metabolizers. In extensive metabolizers, omeprazole is primarily metabolized by CYP2C19. The systemic exposure to omeprazole varies with a patient’s metabolism status: poor metabolizers > intermediate
metabolizers > extensive metabolizers. Approximately 3% of Caucasians and 15 to 20% of Asians are CYP2C19 poor metabolizers.
In pharmacokinetic studies of single 20 mg omeprazole dose, the AUC of omeprazole in Asian subjects was approximately four-fold of that in Caucasians [see Use In Specific Populations].
Clinical Studies
The effectiveness of ZEGERID has been established, in part, based on studies of an oral delayed-release omeprazole product for the treatment of active duodenal ulcer, active benign gastric ulcer, symptomatic GERD, EE due to acid-mediated GERD, and maintenance of healing of EE due to acid-mediated GERD [see Active Duodenal Ulcer, Active Benign Gastric Ulcer, Symptomatic GERD, EE Due To Acid-Mediated GERD, Maintenance Of Healing Of EE Due To Acid-Mediated GERD].
ZEGERID for oral suspension was studied for the reduction of risk of upper GI bleeding in critically ill adult patients [see Reduction Of Risk Of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding In Critically Ill Patients].
Active Duodenal Ulcer
In a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 147 patients with endoscopically documented duodenal ulcer, the percentage of patients healed (per protocol) at 2 and 4 weeks was significantly higher with omeprazole delayed-release capsules 20 mg once a day than with placebo (p ≤ 0.01). (See Table 11.)
Table 11: Treatment of Active Duodenal Ulcer
% of Patients Healed |
|
Omeprazole 20 mg a.m. (n = 99) |
Placebo a.m. (n = 48) |
Week 2 |
411 |
13 |
Week 4 |
751 |
27 |
1. (p ≤ 0.01) |
Complete daytime and nighttime pain relief occurred significantly faster (p ≤ 0.01) in patients treated with omeprazole 20 mg than in patients treated with placebo. At the end of the study, significantly more patients who had received
omeprazole had complete relief of daytime pain (p ≤ 0.05) and nighttime pain (p ≤ 0.01).
In a multicenter, double-blind study of 293 patients with endoscopically documented duodenal ulcer, the percentage of patients healed (per protocol) at 4 weeks was significantly higher with omeprazole 20 mg once a day than with ranitidine 150 mg twice daily (p < 0.01). (See Table 12.)
Table 12: Treatment of Active Duodenal Ulcer % of Patients Healed
|
Omeprazole 20 mg a.m. (n = 145) |
Ranitidine 150 mg twice daily (n = 148) |
Week 2 |
42 |
34 |
Week 4 |
821 |
63 |
1. (p < 0.01) |
Healing occurred significantly faster in patients treated with omeprazole than in those treated with ranitidine 150 mg twice daily (p < 0.01).
In a foreign multinational randomized, double-blind study of 105 patients with endoscopically documented duodenal ulcer, 40 mg and 20 mg of omeprazole were compared to 150 mg twice daily of ranitidine at 2, 4 and 8 weeks. At 2 and 4 weeks both doses of omeprazole were statistically superior (per protocol) to ranitidine, but 40 mg was not superior to 20 mg of omeprazole, and at 8 weeks there was no significant difference between any of the active drugs. (See Table 13.)
Table 13: Treatment of Active Duodenal Ulcer % of Patients Healed
|
Omeprazole |
Ranitidine 150 mg twice daily (n = 35) |
40 mg (n = 36) |
20 mg (n = 34) |
Week 2 |
831 |
831 |
53 |
Week 4 |
1001 |
971 |
82 |
Week 8 |
100 |
100 |
94 |
1. (p ≤ 0.01) |
Active Benign Gastric Ulcer
In a U.S. multicenter, double-blind study of omeprazole 40 mg once a day, 20 mg once a day, and placebo in 520 patients with endoscopically diagnosed gastric ulcer, the following results were obtained. (See Table 14.)
Table 14: Treatment of Gastric Ulcer % of Patients Healed (All Patients Treated)
|
Omeprazole 40 mg once daily (n = 214) |
Omeprazole 20 mg once daily (n = 202) |
Placebo (n = 104) |
Week 4 |
55.61 |
47.51 |
30.8 |
Week 8 |
82.71,2 |
74.81 |
48.1 |
1. (p < 0.01) omeprazole 40 mg or 20 mg versus placebo
2. (p < 0.05) omeprazole 40 mg versus 20 mg |
For the stratified groups of patients with ulcer size less than or equal to 1 cm, no difference in healing rates between 40 mg and 20 mg was detected at either 4 or 8 weeks. For patients with ulcer size greater than 1 cm, 40 mg was significantly more effective than 20 mg at 8 weeks.
In a foreign, multinational, double-blind study of 602 patients with endoscopically diagnosed gastric ulcer, omeprazole 40 mg once a day, 20 mg once a day, and ranitidine 150 mg twice a day were evaluated. (See Table 15.)
Table 15: Treatment of Gastric Ulcer % of Patients Healed (All Patients Treated)
|
Omeprazole 40 mg once daily (n = 187) |
Omeprazole 20 mg once daily (n = 200) |
Ranitidine 150 mg twice daily (n = 199) |
Week 4 |
78.11,2 |
63.5 |
56.3 |
Week 8 |
91.41,2 |
81.5 |
78.4 |
1. (p < 0.01) omeprazole 40 mg versus ranitidine
2. (p < 0.01) omeprazole 40 mg versus 20 mg |
Symptomatic GERD
A placebo-controlled study was conducted in Scandinavia to compare the efficacy of omeprazole 20 mg or 10 mg once daily for up to 4 weeks in the treatment of heartburn and other symptoms in GERD patients without EE. Results are shown in Table 16.
Table 16: % Successful Symptomatic Outcome1
|
Omeprazole 20 mg a.m. |
Omeprazole 10 mg a.m. |
Placebo a.m. |
All Patients |
462,3
(n = 205) |
313
(n = 199) |
13 (n = 105) |
Patients with Confirmed GERD |
562,3
(n = 115) |
363
(n = 109) |
14 (n = 59) |
1. Defined as complete resolution of heartburn
2. (p < 0.005) versus 10 mg
3. (p < 0.005) versus placebo |
EE Due To Acid-Mediated GERD
In a U.S. multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 40 mg or 20 mg of omeprazole delayed-release capsules in patients with symptoms of GERD and endoscopically diagnosed erosive esophagitis of grade 2 or above, the percentage healing rates (per protocol) were as shown in Table 17.
Table 17: % Patients Healed
|
Omeprazole 40 mg (n = 87) |
Omeprazole 20 mg (n = 83) |
Placebo (n = 43) |
Week 4 |
451 |
391 |
7 |
Week 8 |
751 |
741 |
14 |
1. (p < 0.01) omeprazole versus placebo. |
In this study, the 40 mg dose was not superior to the 20 mg dose of omeprazole in the percentage healing rate. Other controlled clinical trials have also shown that omeprazole is effective in severe GERD. In comparisons with histamine H2-receptor antagonists in patients with erosive esophagitis, grade 2 or above, omeprazole in a dose of 20 mg was significantly more effective than the active controls. Complete daytime and nighttime heartburn relief occurred significantly faster (p < 0.01) in patients treated with omeprazole than in those taking placebo or histamine H2-receptor antagonists.
In this and five other controlled GERD studies, significantly more patients taking 20 mg omeprazole (84%) reported complete relief of GERD symptoms than patients receiving placebo (12%).
Maintenance Of Healing Of EE Due To Acid-Mediated GERD
In a U.S. double-blind, randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled study; two dose regimens of omeprazole were studied in patients with endoscopically confirmed healed esophagitis. Results to determine maintenance of healing of erosive esophagitis are shown in Table 18.
Table 18: Life Table Analysis
|
Omeprazole 20 mg once daily (n = 138) |
Omeprazole 20 mg 3 days per week (n = 137) |
Placebo
(n = 131) |
Percent in Endoscopic Remission at 6 Months |
701 |
34 |
11 |
1. (p < 0.01) omeprazole 20 mg once daily versus omeprazole 20 mg 3 consecutive days per week or placebo. |
In an international, multicenter, double-blind study, omeprazole 20 mg daily and 10 mg daily were compared to ranitidine 150 mg twice daily in patients with endoscopically confirmed healed esophagitis. Table 19 provides the results of this study for maintenance of healing of EE.
Table 19: Life Table Analysis
|
Omeprazole 20 mg once daily (n = 131) |
Omeprazole 10 mg once daily (n = 133) |
Ranitidine 150 mg twice daily (n = 128) |
Percent in Endoscopic Remission at 12 Months |
771 |
582 |
46 |
1. (p = 0.01) omeprazole 20 mg once daily versus omeprazole 10 mg once daily or Ranitidine.
2. (p = 0.03) omeprazole 10 mg once daily versus Ranitidine. |
In patients who initially had grades 3 or 4 erosive esophagitis, for maintenance after healing 20 mg daily of omeprazole was effective, while 10 mg did not demonstrate effectiveness.
Reduction Of Risk Of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding In Critically Ill Patients
A double-blind, multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority clinical trial was conducted to compare ZEGERID oral suspension and intravenous cimetidine for the reduction of risk of upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in critically ill patients (mean APACHE II score = 23.7). The primary endpoint was significant upper GI bleeding defined as bright red blood which did not clear after adjustment of the nasogastric tube and a 5 to 10 minute lavage, or persistent Gastroccult positive coffee grounds for 8 consecutive hours which did not clear with 100 mL lavage. ZEGERID oral suspension was administered as 40 mg (two doses administered 6 to 8 hours apart on the first day via orogastric or nasogastric tube, followed by 40 mg once daily thereafter) and intravenous cimetidine (300 mg bolus, followed by 50 to 100 mg/hr continuously thereafter) for up to 14 days (mean = 6.8 days). A total of 359 patients were studied, age range 16 to 91 (mean = 56 years), 58.5% were males, and 64% were Caucasians. The results of the study showed that ZEGERID oral suspension was non-inferior to intravenous cimetidine, 7/178 (3.9%) patients in the ZEGERID group vs. 10/181 (5.5%) patients in the cimetidine group experienced clinically significant upper GI bleeding.