Clinical Pharmacology for Yervoy
Mechanism Of Action
CTLA-4 is a negative regulator of T-cell activity. Ipilimumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to CTLA-4 and blocks the interaction of CTLA-4 with its ligands, CD80/CD86. Blockade of CTLA-4 has been shown to augment T-cell activation and proliferation, including the activation and proliferation of tumor infiltrating T-effector cells. Inhibition of CTLA-4 signaling can also reduce T-regulatory cell function, which may contribute to a general increase in T-cell responsiveness, including the anti-tumor immune response.
Pharmacokinetics
The pharmacokinetics (PK) of ipilimumab was studied in 785 patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma who received doses of 0.3, 3, or 10 mg/kg once every 3 weeks for 4 doses. The PK of ipilimumab is linear in the dose range of 0.3 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg. Following administration of YERVOY every 3 weeks, the systemic accumulation was 1.5-fold or less. Steady-state concentrations of ipilimumab were reached by the third dose; the mean minimum concentration (Cmin) at steady state was 19.4 mcg/mL at 3 mg/kg and 58.1 mcg/mL at 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks.
Elimination
The mean (percent coefficient of variation) terminal half-life (t½) was 15.4 days (34%) and then mean (percent coefficient of variation) clearance (CL) was 16.8 mL/h (38%).
The CL of ipilimumab was unchanged in presence of anti-ipilimumab antibodies.
Specific Populations
The CL of ipilimumab increased with increasing body weight supporting the recommended body weight (mg/kg) based dosing. The following factors had no clinically important effect on the CL of ipilimumab: age (range: 23 to 88 years), sex, performance status, renal impairment (glomerular filtration rate ≥15 mL/min/1.73 m²), mild hepatic impairment (total bilirubin [TB] >1 to 1.5 times the upper limit of normal [ULN] or AST > ULN), previous cancer therapy, and baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. The effect of race was not examined due to limited data available in non-White racial groups. YERVOY has not been studied in patients with moderate (TB >1.5 to 3 times ULN and any AST) or severe (TB >3 times ULN and any AST) hepatic impairment.
Pediatric Patients
The exposures of ipilimumab in pediatric patients 12 years and older are comparable to those in adult patients at the recommended dosage.
Drug Interaction Studies
Ipilimumab With Nivolumab
When YERVOY 1 mg/kg was administered with nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, the CL of ipilimumab was unchanged compared to when YERVOY was administered alone.
When YERVOY 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks was administered in combination with nivolumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks, the CL of ipilimumab was unchanged compared to ipilimumab administered alone and the CL of nivolumab was increased by 29% compared to nivolumab administered alone.
When YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks was administered in combination with nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, the CL of ipilimumab increased by 30% compared to YERVOY administered alone and the CL of nivolumab was unchanged compared to nivolumab administered alone.
When YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks was administered in combination with nivolumab 360 mg every 3 weeks and chemotherapy, the CL of ipilimumab increased by 22% compared to YERVOY administered alone and the CL of nivolumab was unchanged compared to nivolumab administered alone.
Immunogenicity
The observed incidence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) is highly dependent on the sensitivity and specificity of the assay. Differences in assay methods preclude meaningful comparisons of the incidence of ADA in the studies described below with the incidence of ADA in other studies, including those of YERVOY or of other ipilimumab products.
Eleven (1.1%) of 1024 evaluable patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma tested positive for treatment-emergent binding antibodies against ipilimumab in an electrochemiluminescent (ECL) based assay. This assay had substantial limitations in detecting anti-ipilimumab antibodies in the presence of ipilimumab. Seven (4.9%) of 144 patients receiving ipilimumab developed antiÂipilimumab antibodies and 7 (4.5%) of 156 patients receiving placebo for the adjuvant treatment of melanoma tested positive for anti-ipilimumab antibodies using an ECL assay with improved drug tolerance. No patients tested positive for neutralizing antibodies. No infusion-related reactions occurred in patients who tested positive for anti-ipilimumab antibodies.
Of the 499 patients evaluable for anti-ipilimumab antibodies in CHECKMATE-214 and CHECKMATE-142, 27 (5.4%) were positive for anti-ipilimumab antibodies; there were no patients with neutralizing antibodies against ipilimumab. There was no evidence of increased incidence of infusion reactions to YERVOY in patients with anti-ipilimumab antibodies.
Of 483 patients evaluable for anti-ipilimumab antibodies in CHECKMATE-227 Part 1, 8.5% were positive for treatment-emergent anti-ipilimumab antibodies. No patients had neutralizing antibodies against ipilimumab. In Part 1 of the same study, of 491 patients evaluable for antiÂnivolumab antibodies, 36.7% were positive for anti-nivolumab antibodies and 1.4% had neutralizing antibodies against nivolumab.
Of 305 patients evaluable for anti-ipilimumab antibodies in CHECKMATE-9LA, 8% were positive for anti-ipilimumab antibodies and 1.6% were positive for anti-ipilimumab neutralizing antibodies. There was no evidence of increased incidence of infusion reactions to YERVOY in patients with anti-ipilimumab antibodies. Of 308 patients evaluable for anti-nivolumab antibodies in CHECKMATE-9LA, 34% were positive for anti-nivolumab antibodies and 2.6% had neutralizing antibodies against nivolumab.
Of 271 patients evaluable for anti-ipilimumab antibodies in CHECKMATE-743, 13.7% were positive for anti-ipilimumab antibodies and 0.4% were positive for anti-ipilimumab neutralizing antibodies. Of 269 patients evaluable for anti-nivolumab antibodies in CHECKMATE-743, 25.7% were positive for anti-nivolumab antibodies and 0.7% had neutralizing antibodies against nivolumab.
Anti-drug antibody and neutralizing antibody responses were monitored throughout the treatment period where the benefit to risk ratio was assessed. Incidence of anti-drug antibodies and neutralizing antibodies are presented in Table 24.
Table 24: YERVOY Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) and Neutralizing Antibody (NAb) Incidence
| Treatment Regimena |
Indication(s) |
ADA |
NAbb |
| YERVOY as a single agent |
Melanoma |
1.1% (11/1024) |
0 (0/11) |
| Adjuvant Melanoma |
4.9 (7/144) |
0 (0/7) |
|
Melanoma |
8.4% (33/391) |
3% (1/33) |
| YERVOY with nivolumab for 4 doses followed by nivolumab as a single agent |
HCC |
5.3% (13/244) |
0 (0/13) |
|
RCC and CRC |
5.4% (27/499) |
0% (0/27) |
| YERVOY with nivolumab |
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma |
13.7% (37/271) |
2.7% (1/37) |
| NSCLC |
8.5% (41/483) |
0 (0/41) |
| YERVOY with nivolumab and 2 cycles of platinum-doublet chemotherapy |
NSCLC |
7.5% (23/305) |
21.7% (5/23) |
aDetails of each treatment regimen are described in Section 14 [see Clinical Studies].
b NAb incidence is reported among the subset of patients positive for ADA. ADA = treatment-emergent anti-ipilimumab antibodies, NAb = neutralizing antibodies, HCC = hepatocellular carcinoma, RCC = renal cell carcinoma, CRC = colorectal cancer, NSCLC = non-small cell lung cancer. |
Effects Of Anti-Drug Antibodies
Presence of treatment-emergent anti-ipilimumab antibodies did not affect ipilimumab clearance after administration of ipilimumab as monotherapy or in combination with nivolumab. These anti-drug antibody-associated pharmacokinetic changes were not considered to be clinically significant. There was no identified clinically significant effect of anti-drug antibodies on incidence of infusion-related reactions. In hepatocellular carcinoma, there was no identified clinically significant effect of anti-drug antibodies on efficacy for ipilimumab in combination with nivolumab. For other indications, the effects of anti-drug antibodies on effectiveness have not been fully characterized.
Clinical Studies
Unresectable Or Metastatic Melanoma
The efficacy of YERVOY was investigated in a Study MDX010-20, a randomized (3:1:1), double-blind, double-dummy trial (NCT00094653) that included patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma previously treated with one or more of the following: aldesleukin, dacarbazine, temozolomide, fotemustine, or carboplatin. The trial enrolled only patients with HLA-A2*0201 genotype; this HLA genotype facilitates the immune presentation of the investigational peptide vaccine. The trial excluded patients with active autoimmune disease or those receiving systemic immunosuppression for organ transplantation. Patients were randomized to YERVOY administered at a dose of 3 mg/kg as an intravenous infusion every 3 weeks for 4 doses with an investigational peptide vaccine with incomplete Freund’s adjuvant -gp100 administered at a dose of 2 mg peptide by deep subcutaneous injection every 3 weeks for 4 doses; gp100 administered at a dose of 2 mg by deep subcutaneous injection every 3 weeks for 4 doses as a single agent with a placebo; or YERVOY administered at a dose of 3 mg/kg by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks for 4 doses with a placebo. The major efficacy outcome measure was overall survival (OS) in the YERVOY and gp100 arm compared to that in the single-agent gp100 arm. Secondary efficacy outcome measures were OS in the YERVOY and gp100 arm compared to the YERVOY arm, OS in the YERVOY arm compared to the gp100 arm, best overall response rate (BORR) as assessed by the investigator at week 24 between each of the trial arms, and duration of response. Assessment of tumor response was conducted at weeks 12 and 24, and every 3 months thereafter. Patients with evidence of objective tumor response at 12 or 24 weeks had assessment for confirmation of durability of response at 16 or 28 weeks, respectively.
A total of 676 patients were randomized, 403 to YERVOY and gp100 arm, 137 to YERVOY single agent arm and 136 to gp100 single agent arm. Of the randomized patients, 61%, 59%, and 54% in the YERVOY and gp100, YERVOY, and gp100 arms, respectively, were male. Twenty-nine percent were ≥65 years of age, the median age was 57 years, 71% had M1c stage, 12% had a history of previously treated brain metastasis, 98% had ECOG performance status of 0 and 1, 23% had received aldesleukin, and 38% had elevated LDH level. Sixty-one percent of patients randomized to either YERVOY-containing arm received all 4 planned doses. The median duration of follow-up was 8.9 months.
The efficacy results are shown in Table 25 and Figure 1.
Table 25: Efficacy Results for Study MDX010-20
|
YERVOY 3 mg/kg
n=137 |
YERVOY 3 mg/kg and gp100
n=403 |
gp100
n=136 |
| Overall Survival |
Median in months
(95% CI) |
10
(8.0, 13.8) |
10
(8.5, 11.5) |
6
(5.5, 8.7) |
Hazard ratio
(vs. gp100)
(95% CI) |
0.66
(0.51, 0.87) |
0.68
(0.55, 0.85) |
|
| p-value |
p=0.0026a |
p=0.0004 |
|
Hazard ratio
(vs. YERVOY)
(95% CI) |
|
1.04
(0.83, 1.30) |
|
Best Overall Response Rate
(BORR) |
10.9% |
5.7% |
1.5% |
| (95% CI) |
(6.3%, 17.4%) |
(3.7%, 8.4%) |
(0.2%, 5.2%) |
| Median duration of response in months |
NRb |
11.5 |
NRb |
a Not adjusted for multiple comparisons.
b Not Reached |
Figure 1: Kaplan-Meier Curves for Overall Survival in Study MDX010-20
Previously Untreated Metastatic Melanoma: In Combination With Nivolumab
CHECKMATE-067 (NCT01844505) was a multicenter, randomized (1:1:1), double-blind trial in which 945 patients with previously untreated, unresectable or metastatic melanoma were randomized to one of the following arms: YERVOY and nivolumab, nivolumab, or YERVOY. Patients were required to have completed adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment at least 6 weeks prior to randomization and have no prior treatment with anti-CTLA-4 antibody and no evidence of active brain metastasis, ocular melanoma, autoimmune disease, or medical conditions requiring systemic immunosuppression.
Patients were randomized to receive:
- YERVOY 3 mg/kg with nivolumab 1 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks for 4 doses, followed by nivolumab as a single agent at a dose of 3 mg/kg by intravenous infusion every 2 weeks (YERVOY and nivolumab arm),
- Nivolumab 3 mg/kg by intravenous infusion every 2 weeks (nivolumab arm), or
- YERVOY 3 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks for 4 doses followed by placebo every 2 weeks (YERVOY arm)
Randomization was stratified by PD-L1 expression (≥5% vs. <5% tumor cell membrane expression) as determined by a clinical trial assay, BRAF V600 mutation status, and M stage per the AJCC staging system (M0, M1a, M1b vs. M1c). Tumor assessments were conducted 12 weeks after randomization then every 6 weeks for the first year, and every 12 weeks thereafter. The major efficacy outcome measures were investigator-assessed PFS per RECIST v1.1 and OS. Additional efficacy outcome measures were confirmed ORR and duration of response.
The trial population characteristics were: median age 61 years (range: 18 to 90); 65% male; 97% White; ECOG performance score 0 (73%) or 1 (27%). Disease characteristics were: AJCC Stage IV disease (93%); M1c disease (58%); elevated LDH (36%); history of brain metastases (4%); BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma (32%); PD-L1 ≥5% tumor cell membrane expression as determined by the clinical trials assay (46%); and prior adjuvant therapy (22%).
CHECKMATE-067 demonstrated statistically significant improvements in OS and PFS for patients randomized to either nivolumab-containing arm as compared with the YERVOY arm. The trial was not designed to assess whether adding YERVOY to nivolumab improves PFS or OS compared to nivolumab as a single agent. Efficacy results are shown in Table 26 and Figure 2.
Table 26: Efficacy Results -CHECKMATE-067
|
YERVOY and Nivolumab
(n=314) |
Nivolumab
(n=316) |
YERVOY
(n=315) |
| Overall Survivala |
| Deaths (%) |
128 (41) |
142 (45) |
197 (63) |
| Hazard ratiob (vs. YERVOY) |
0.55 |
0.63 |
|
| (95% CI) |
(0.44, 0.69) |
(0.50, 0.78) |
|
| p-valuec,d |
<0.0001 |
<0.0001 |
|
| Progression-free Survivala |
| Disease progression or death |
151 (48%) |
174 (55%) |
234 (74%) |
| Median (months) |
11.5 |
6.9 |
2.9 |
| (95% CI) |
(8.9, 16.7) |
(4.3, 9.5) |
(2.8, 3.4) |
| Hazard ratiob (vs. YERVOY) |
0.42 |
0.57 |
|
| (95% CI) |
(0.34, 0.51) |
(0.47, 0.69) |
|
| p-valuec,e |
<0.0001 |
<0.0001 |
|
| Confirmed Overall Response Ratea |
50% |
40% |
14% |
| (95% CI) |
(44, 55) |
(34, 46) |
(10, 18) |
| p-valuef |
<0.0001 |
<0.0001 |
|
| Complete response |
8.9% |
8.5% |
1.9% |
| Partial response |
41% |
31% |
12% |
| Duration of Response |
| Proportion ≥6 months in duration |
76% |
74% |
63% |
| Range (months) |
1.2+ to 15.8+ |
1.3+ to 14.6+ |
1.0+ to 13.8+ |
a OS results are based on final OS analysis with 28 months of minimum follow-up; PFS (co-primary endpoint) and ORR (secondary endpoint) results were based on primary analysis with 9 months of minimum follow-up.
b Based on a stratified proportional hazards model.
c Based on stratified log-rank test.
d If the maximum of the two OS p-values is less than 0.04 (a significance level assigned by the Hochberg procedure), then both p-values are considered significant.
e p-value is compared with 0.005 of the allocated alpha for final PFS treatment comparisons.
f Based on the stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test.
+ Censored observation |
Figure 2: Overall Survival -CHECKMATE-067
Based on a minimum follow-up of 48 months, the median OS was not reached (95% CI: 38.2, NR) in the YERVOY and nivolumab arm. The median OS was 36.9 months (95% CI: 28.3, NR) in the nivolumab arm and 19.9 months (95% CI: 16.9, 24.6) in the YERVOY arm.
Based on a minimum follow-up of 28 months, the median PFS was 11.7 months (95% CI: 8.9, 21.9) in the YERVOY and nivolumab arm, 6.9 months (95% CI: 4.3, 9.5) in the nivolumab arm, and 2.9 months (95% CI: 2.8, 3.2) in the YERVOY arm. Based on a minimum follow-up of 28 months, the proportion of responses lasting ≥24 months was 55% in the YERVOY and nivolumab arm, 56% in the nivolumab arm, and 39% in the YERVOY arm.
Adjuvant Treatment Of Melanoma
The efficacy of YERVOY was evaluated in Study E1609 (NCT01274338), an open-label, multicenter, randomized trial for the adjuvant treatment of cutaneous melanoma in patients with completely resected node positive disease (either clinically detectable or any size with ulceration or mitosis ≥1/mm²), in transit metastasis, satellites, or metastatic disease. The trial excluded patients with a history of prior therapy for melanoma and autoimmune disease requiring steroid treatment. Patients were randomized to receive one of the following regimens:
- YERVOY 3 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks for 4 doses, followed by the same dose every 12 weeks for up to 4 additional doses,
- High-dose interferon α-2b (HDI) intravenously at 20 million units/m² per day, 5 days per week, for 4 weeks (induction), followed by 10 million units/m² per day SC every other day, 3 days per week, for 48 weeks (maintenance), or
- YERVOY 10 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks for 4 doses, followed by the same dose every 12 weeks for up to 4 additional doses.
Randomization was stratified by AJCC 7th edition stage (IIIB, IIIC, M1a, or M1b). Tumor assessments were conducted every 3 months in patients <2 years from study entry, then every 6 months in patients 2-5 years from study entry, and every 12 months in patients >5 years from study entry for up to 20 years. Treatment continued for a maximum of 60 weeks with ipilimumab or 52 weeks with HDI, or until unacceptable toxic effects, disease progression, or withdrawal of consent. The major efficacy outcome measures were investigator-assessed recurrence-free survival (RFS) by imaging (for CNS lesions) or imaging and positive cytology or histology (for non-CNS lesions) and overall survival (OS). Only the efficacy results for the recommended starting dose of 3 mg/kg YERVOY are described below.
A total of 1051 patients were randomized to YERVOY 3 mg/kg (n=523) and HDI (n=528). The median age was 54 years (range: 18 to 83), 62% were male, 97% were white, 0.3% were Asian, and 0.4% were Black. Regarding disease stage, 53% had Stage IIIB, 40% had Stage IIIC (with no in-transit metastases), and 7% had Stage IV disease.
The efficacy results are in Table 27 and Figure 3.
Table 27: Efficacy Results for E1609
|
YERVOY 3 mg/kg
n=523 |
HDI
n=528 |
| Overall Survival |
| Number of deaths (%) |
130 (25) |
134 (25) |
| Hazard ratio (95% CI) |
0.78 (0.61, 0.99) |
| p-value (stratified log-ranka) |
0.044 |
| 5-year OS Rates |
72 |
67 |
| (95% CI) |
(68, 76) |
(62, 71) |
| Recurrence-Free Survival |
| Number of events (%) |
246 (47) |
232 (44) |
| Median in years |
4.5 |
2.5 |
| (95% CI) |
(2.7, NA) |
(1.8, 3.5) |
| Hazard ratio (95% CI) |
0.85 (0.71, 1.02) |
| a Two-sided p-value from log-rank test stratified by AJCC stage. |
Figure 3: Kaplan-Meier Curves for Overall Survival with Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg vs. HDI in Study E1609
Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
The efficacy of YERVOY with nivolumab was evaluated in CHECKMATE-214 (NCT02231749), a randomized (1:1), open-label study in patients with previously untreated advanced RCC. Patients were included regardless of their PD-L1 status. CHECKMATE-214 excluded patients with any history of or concurrent brain metastases, active autoimmune disease, or medical conditions requiring systemic immunosuppression. Patients were randomized to nivolumab 3 mg/kg and YERVOY 1 mg/kg administered intravenously every 3 weeks for 4 doses followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg every two weeks or to sunitinib administered orally 50 mg daily for the first 4 weeks of each 6-week cycle. Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients were stratified by International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) prognostic score and region. The major efficacy outcome measures were OS, PFS (IRRC-assessed), and confirmed ORR (IRRC-assessed) in intermediate/poor risk patients. Intermediate/poor risk patients had at least 1 or more of 6 prognostic risk factors as per the IMDC criteria: less than one year from time of initial RCC diagnosis to randomization, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) <80%, hemoglobin less than the lower limit of normal, corrected calcium >10 mg/dL, platelet count >ULN, and absolute neutrophil count >ULN.
A total of 847 patients were randomized, 425 to YERVOY with nivolumab and 422 to sunitinib. The median age was 61 years (range: 21 to 85) with 38% ≥65 years of age and 8% ≥75 years of age. The majority of patients were male (73%) andWhite (87%) and 26% and 74% of patients had a baseline KPS of 70% to 80% and 90% to 100%, respectively.
Efficacy results from CHECKMATE-214 are presented in Table 28 and Figure 4. In intermediate/poor risk patients, the trial demonstrated statistically significant improvement in OS and ORR for patients randomized to YERVOY and nivolumab arm as compared with sunitinib arm. OS benefit was observed regardless of PD-L1 expression level. The trial did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in PFS.
Table 28: Efficacy Results for CHECKMATE-214
| Efficacy Parameter |
Intermediate/Poor-Risk |
YERVOY 1 mg/kg and Nivolumab
n=425 |
Sunitinib
n=422 |
| Overall Survival |
| Number of deaths |
140 (32.9%) |
188 (44.5%) |
| Median in months |
NE |
25.9 |
| Hazard ratio (99.8% CI)a |
0.63 (0.44, 0.89) |
| p-valueb,c |
<0.0001 |
| Confirmed Objective Response Rate (95% CI) |
41.6% (36.9%, 46.5%) |
26.5% (22.4%, 31.0%) |
| Complete Response |
40 (9.4%) |
5 (1.2%) |
| Partial Response |
137 (32.2%) |
107 (25.4%) |
| Median duration of response in months (95% CI) |
NE (21.8, NE) |
18.2 (14.8, NE) |
| p-valued,e |
<0.0001 |
| Progression-free Survival |
| Number of events (progression or death) |
228 (53.6%) |
228 (54.0%) |
| Median in months |
11.6 |
8.4 |
| Hazard ratio (99.1% CI)a |
0.82 (0.64, 1.05) |
| p-valueb |
NSf |
a Based on a stratified proportional hazards model.
b Based on a stratified log-rank test.
c p-value is compared to alpha 0.002 in order to achieve statistical significance.
d Based on the stratified DerSimonian-Laird test.
e p-value is compared to alpha 0.001 in order to achieve statistical significance.
f Not Significant at alpha level of 0.009. |
Figure 4: Kaplan-Meier Curves for Overall Survival (Intermediate/Poor Risk Population) in CHECKMATE-214
CHECKMATE-214 also randomized 249 favorable risk patients as per IMDC criteria to nivolumab and YERVOY (n=125) or to sunitinib (n=124). These patients were not evaluated as part of the efficacy analysis population. OS in favorable risk patients receiving nivolumab and YERVOY compared to sunitinib has a hazard ratio of 1.45 (95% CI: 0.75, 2.81). The efficacy of nivolumab and YERVOY in previously untreated renal cell carcinoma with favorable risk disease has not been established.
Microsatellite Instability-High Or Mismatch Repair Deficient Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Treatment Of MSI-H Or dMMR mCRC In Combination With Nivolumab
CHECKMATE-8HW (NCT03143153) was a randomized, 3-arm, open-label trial in immunotherapy-naive patients across all lines of therapy with unresectable or metastatic CRC with known tumor MSI-H or dMMR (MSI-H/dMMR) status as determined in accordance with local standard of practice using PCR, NGS or IHC, assays. Central assessment of MSI-H status using PCR (Idylla MSI) test and dMMR status using IHC (Omnis MMR) test was conducted retrospectively on patient tumor specimens used for local MSI-H/dMMR status determination. Patients with confirmed MSI-H/dMMR status by either central test comprised the primary study population.
The trial excluded patients with brain metastasis that were symptomatic, had active autoimmune disease, used systemic corticosteroids or immunosuppressants, or had been treated with checkpoint inhibitors.
Patients were randomized to receive one of the following treatments:
- YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks and nivolumab 240 mg every 3 weeks for a maximum of 4 doses, then nivolumab 480 mg every 4 weeks
- Nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks for 6 doses, then nivolumab 480 mg every 4 weeks.
- Investigator’s choice chemotherapy
- mFOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and FU) with or without either bevacizumab or cetuximab: Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m², leucovorin 400 mg/m² , and FU 400 mg/m² bolus followed by FU 2400 mg/m² over 46 hours every 2 weeks. Bevacizumab 5 mg/kg or cetuximab 500 mg/m² administered prior to mFOLFOX6 every 2 weeks.
- FOLFIRI (irinotecan, leucovorin, and FU) with or without either bevacizumab or cetuximab: Irinotecan 180 mg/m², leucovorin 400 mg/m² , and FU 400 mg/m² bolus and FU 2400 mg/m² over 46 hours every 2 weeks. Bevacizumab 5 mg/kg on or cetuximab 500 mg/m² administered prior to FOLFIRI every 2 weeks.
Randomization was stratified by tumor location (right vs left) and by prior lines of therapy (0, 1, 2L+). Patients randomized to the chemotherapy arm could receive YERVOY plus nivolumab combination upon progression assessed by BICR.
Study treatment was administered until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or for up to 2 years for patients who received YERVOY plus nivolumab or nivolumab monotherapy. Patients who discontinued combination therapy because of an adverse reaction attributed to YERVOY were permitted to continue nivolumab as a single agent. Nivolumab with or without YERVOY could be administered beyond RECIST 1.1-assessed progressive disease if there was a clinical benefit as determined by investigator and therapy was tolerated. Tumor assessments per RECIST v1.1 were conducted every 6 weeks for the first 24 weeks, then every 8 weeks thereafter up until week 96, then every 16 weeks thereafter up until week 144, and then every 24 weeks.
The evaluation of efficacy relied on the comparison of patients with centrally confirmed MSI-H/dMMR mCRC randomized to YERVOY in combination with nivolumab versus chemotherapy in the first-line (1L) setting and the comparison of patients with centrally confirmed MSI-H/dMMR mCRC randomized to YERVOY in combination with nivolumab vs nivolumab in all lines setting.
The major efficacy outcome measure was BICR-assessed PFS per RECIST 1.1. Additional efficacy measures included ORR and duration of response assessed by BICR and OS.
The baseline characteristics of the total of 839 patients randomized were: the median age was 63 years (range: 20 to 87), with 46% ≥65 years of age and 14% ≥75 years of age; 50% were male and 87% were White, 9.3% were Asian, 1.5% Black or African American, and 2.3% other race; 9.2% were Hispanic or Latino, 50% Not Hispanic or Latino, 41% ethnicity unknown. Baseline ECOG performance status was 0 (52%) and (48%); number of prior lines of therapy was 0 (56%) and 1 Â (24%), and ≥2 (19%); tumor location was right-sided or left-sided for 69% and 31% of patients. The baseline characteristics in patients with centrally confirmed MSI-H/dMMR is consistent with all randomized patients.
First Line YERVOY In Combination With Nivolumab
Among 303 patients in the first-line setting were randomly assigned to YERVOY in combination with nivolumab (202) and to chemotherapy (101), 171 and 84 patients had centrally confirmed MSI-H/dMMR status in YERVOY in combination with nivolumab arm and chemotherapy arm, respectively.
In the 1L setting, 200 of 202 patients assigned to receive YERVOY in combination with nivolumab and 88 of 101 patients assigned to received chemotherapy received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Among the 88 patients who received chemotherapy, 58% and 42% of patients received oxaliplatin-containing regimens and irinotecan-containing regimens, respectively, and 66 (75%) patients received a targeted agent, either bevacizumab (64%) or cetuximab (11%).
The BICR-assessed PFS efficacy results for patients with centrally confirmed MSI-H/dMMR randomized to the YERVOY and nivolumab arm compared with chemotherapy in the 1L setting are presented in Table 29 and Figure 5. The comparative results of ORR and OS between arms were not available at the time of the PFS analysis due to statistical testing strategy.
Table 29: Efficacy Results -CHECKMATE-8HW
|
YERVOY and Nivolumab
(n=171) |
Chemotherapy
(n=84) |
| Progression-free Survival |
| Disease progression or death (%) |
48 (28) |
52 (62) |
| Median in monthsb |
NR |
5.8 |
| (95% CI) |
(38.4, NE) |
(4.4, 7.8) |
| Hazard ratioc (95% CI) |
0.21 (0.14, 0.32) |
| p-valuea |
<0.0001 |
NR: Not Reached; NE: Not Estimable. Minimum follow-up was 6.1 months at data cutoff date 12Oct2023.
a Based on log-rank test stratified by the same factors as used in the Cox proportional hazards model. The p-value threshold for statistical significance was 0.0209.
b Based on Kaplan-Meier estimates.
c HR from a Cox proportional hazards model stratified by tumor sidedness (left vs right) per IRT |
Figure 5: Progression-free Survival, (First line YERVOY + nivolumab vs Chemotherapy)-CHECKMATE-8HW
All Lines YERVOY In Combination With Nivolumab
Among 707 patients across all treatment lines who were randomly assigned to YERVOY in combination with nivolumab (354) and to nivolumab (353) single agent, 296 and 286 patients had centrally confirmed MSI-H/dMMR status in the YERVOY in combination with nivolumab arm and in the nivolumab arm, respectively. Patients receiving at least 1 dose of study treatment included 352 of 354 patients randomized to OPDIVO in combination with ipilimumab, and 351 of 353 patients randomized to single agent OPDIVO.
The BICR-assessed PFS and ORR efficacy results for patients with centrally confirmed MSIÂH/dMMR randomized to the YERVOY in combination with nivolumab compared with nivolumab single agent across all treatment lines setting are presented in Table 30 and Figure 6. At the time of PFS analysis OS between arms were not available due to statistical testing strategy.
Table 30: Efficacy Results All Lines -CHECKMATE-8HW
|
YERVOY and Nivolumab
(n=296) |
Nivolumab
(n=286) |
| Progression-free Survival |
| Disease progression or death n (%) |
101 (34) |
136 (48) |
| Median (months)b |
NR |
39.3 |
| (95% CI) |
(53.82, NE) |
(22.1, NE) |
| Hazard ratioc (95% CI) |
0.62 (0.48, 0.81) |
| p-valuea |
0.0003 |
| Objective Response Rate (ORR) |
| Response Rate, n (%) |
209 (71%) |
165 (58%) |
| (95% CI) |
(65, 76) |
(52, 63) |
| Complete Response Rate, n (%) |
90 (30%) |
80 (28%) |
| Partial Response, n (%) |
119 (40%) |
65 (30%) |
| p-valued |
0.0011 |
NR: Not Reached; NE: Not Estimable. Minimum follow-up was 16.7 months at data cutoff date 28Aug2024.
a Based on log-rank test stratified by the same factors as used in the Cox proportional hazards model. The p-value threshold for statistical significance was 0.0095.
b Based on Kaplan-Meier estimates.
c HR from a Cox proportional hazards model stratified by tumor sidedness (left vs right) and prior lines of therapy (0, 1, ≥2) per IRT.
d Based on Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by the same factors as used in the Cox proportional hazards model. The p-value threshold for statistical significance was 0.006. |
Figure 6: Progression-free Survival (All lines (YERVOY + Nivolumab vs Nivolumab)-CHECKMATE-8HW
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Treatment Of Unresectable Or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
CHECKMATE-9DW (NCT04039607) was a randomized (1:1), open-label trial in adults (18 years of age or older) with unresectable or metastatic HCC. Patients had histologically confirmed HCC, Child Pugh Class A, ECOG performance status 0 or 1, and no prior systemic therapy for advanced disease. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was not mandated prior to enrollment. The trial excluded patients with active autoimmune disease, brain or leptomeningeal metastases, a history of hepatic encephalopathy (within 12 months of randomization), a platelet count <60,000, clinically significant ascites, medical conditions requiring systemic immunosuppression, infection with HIV, or active co-infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) or HBV and hepatitis D virus (HDV).
Patients were randomized to receive either:
- YERVOY 3 mg/kg administered intravenously over 30 minutes in combination with nivolumab 1 mg/kg administered intravenously over 30 minutes every 3 weeks, for a maximum of 4 doses, followed by single agent nivolumab at 480 mg administered intravenously over 30 minutes every 4 weeks, or
- Investigator’s choice:
- Lenvatinib 8 mg orally daily (if body weight <60 kg) or 12 mg orally daily (if body weight ≥60 kg), or
- Sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily
Randomization was stratified by etiology (HBV vs. HCV vs. non-viral), macrovascular invasion and/or extrahepatic spread (present or absent), and alpha-fetoprotein levels (≥400 or <400 ng/mL). Study treatment for YERVOY in combination with nivolumab continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or up to 2 years. Patients who discontinued combination therapy because of an adverse reaction attributed to YERVOY were permitted to continue nivolumab as a single agent. Treatment beyond RECIST 1.1 defined disease progression was permitted if the patient was clinically stable and considered to be deriving clinical benefit by the investigator. Tumor assessments were performed at baseline, after randomization at week 9 and week 16, then every 8 weeks up to 48 weeks, and then every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression, treatment discontinuation, or initiation of subsequent therapy. The primary efficacy outcome measure was OS in all randomized patients. Additional efficacy measures included BICR-assessed ORR and DOR based on RECIST 1.1 criteria.
A total of 668 patients were randomized to receive YERVOY in combination with nivolumab (n=335) or investigator’s choice (n=333) of lenvatinib or sorafenib. In the investigator arm, 85% and 15% of treated patients received lenvatinib or sorafenib, respectively. The trial population characteristics were: median age was 66 years (range: 20 to 89), with 53% ≥65 years old; 82% male; 53% White, 44% Asian, 2.2% Black; 12% Hispanic or Latino, 48% Not Hispanic or Latino, 40% not reported. Baseline ECOG performance status was 0 (71%) or 1 (29%). Thirty-four percent (34%) of patients had HBV infection, 28% had HCV infection, and 36% had no evidence of HBV or HCV infection.
Nineteen percent (19%) of patients had alcoholic liver disease and 11% had non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. The majority of patients had BCLC stage C (73%) disease at baseline, 19% had stage B, and 6% had stage A. Patients with Child-Pugh scores of 5, 6, and 7 were 77%, 20%, and 3%, respectively; 1 patient with Child Pugh 8 was enrolled. A total of 54% of patients had extrahepatic spread; 25% had macrovascular invasion; and 33% had AFP levels ≥400 μg/L.
CHECKMATE-9DW demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in OS and ORR. The minimum follow-up was 26.8 months. Efficacy results are shown in Table 31 and Figure 7.
Table 31: Efficacy Results -CHECKMATE-9DW
|
YERVOY and Nivolumab
(n=335) |
Lenvatinib or Sorafenib
(n=333) |
| Overall Survival |
| Deaths (%) |
194 (58%) |
228 (68%) |
| Median (months) |
23.7 |
20.6 |
| (95% CI) |
(18.8, 29.4) |
(17.5, 22.5) |
| Hazard ratio (95% CI) a |
0.79 (0.65, 0.96) |
| p-value b |
0.0180 |
| Overall Response Rate, n (%)c |
121 (36.1) |
44 (13.2) |
| (95% CI) |
(31.0, 41.5) |
(9.8, 17.3) |
| p-value d |
<0.0001 |
| Complete response (%) |
23 (6.9) |
6 (1.8) |
| Partial response (%) |
98 (29.3) |
38 (11.4) |
| Duration of Response (months) c |
| Median |
30.4 |
12.9 |
| (95% CI) |
(21.2, NRe) |
(10.2, 31.2) |
| Range |
1.5+, 36.9+ |
2.1+, 32.5+ |
a Based on stratified Cox proportional hazard model.
b Based on a 2-sided stratified log-rank test. Boundary for statistical significance: p-value ≤0.0257
c Assessed by BICR using RECIST 1.1 d Based on a 2-sided stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. Boundary for statistical significance: p-value ≤0.025 e NR: Not Reached
+ Censored observation |
Figure 7: Overall Survival -CHECKMATE-9DW
Previously Treated Hepatocellular Carcinoma
CHECKMATE-040 (NCT01658878) was a multicenter, multiple cohort, open-label trial conducted in patients with HCC who progressed on or were intolerant to sorafenib. Additional eligibility criteria included histologic confirmation of HCC and Child-Pugh Class A cirrhosis. The trial excluded patients with active autoimmune disease, brain metastasis, a history of hepatic encephalopathy, clinically significant ascites, infection with HIV, or active co-infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) or HBV and hepatitis D virus (HDV); however, patients with only active HBV or HCV were eligible.
The efficacy of YERVOY 3 mg/kg in combination with nivolumab 1 mg/kg was evaluated in Cohort 4 of CHECKMATE-040. A total of 49 patients received the combination regimen, which was administered every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by single-agent nivolumab at 240 mg every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
The median age was 60 years (range: 18 to 80); 88% were male; 74% were Asian, and 25% were White. Baseline ECOG performance status was 0 (61%) or 1 (39%). Fifty-seven percent (57%) of patients had active HBV infection, 8% had active HCV infection, and 35% had no evidence of active HBV or HCV. The etiology for HCC was alcoholic liver disease in 16% and non-alcoholic liver disease in 6% of patients. Child-Pugh class and score was A5 for 82% and A6 for 18%; 80% of patients had extrahepatic spread; 35% had vascular invasion; and 51% had alfa-fetoprotein (AFP) levels ≥400 μg/L. Prior treatment history included surgery (74%), radiotherapy (29%), or local treatment (59%). All patients had received prior sorafenib, of whom 10% were unable to tolerate sorafenib; 29% of patients had received 2 or more prior systemic therapies.
Efficacy results are shown in Table 32.
Table 32: Efficacy Results -Cohort 4 of CHECKMATE-040
|
YERVOY and Nivolumab (Cohort 4)
(n=49) |
| Overall Response Rate per BICR,a n (%), RECIST vl.1 |
16 (33%) |
| (95% CI)b |
(20, 48) |
| Complete response |
4 (8%) |
| Partial response |
12 (24%) |
| Duration of Response per BICR,a RECIST v1.1 |
n=16 |
| Range (months) |
4.6, 30.5+ |
| Percent with duration ≥6 months |
88% |
| Percent with duration ≥12 months |
56% |
| Percent with duration ≥24 months |
31% |
| Overall Response Rate per BICR,a n (%), mRECIST |
17 (35%) |
| (95% CI)b |
(22, 50) |
| Complete response |
6 (12%) |
| Partial response |
11 (22%) |
a Confirmed by BICR.
b Confidence interval is based on the Clopper and Pearson method. |
Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
First-line Treatment Of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Expressing PD-L1 (≥1%): In Combination With Nivolumab
CHECKMATE-227 (NCT02477826) was a randomized, open-label, multi-part trial in patients with metastatic or recurrent NSCLC. The study included patients (18 years of age or older) with histologically confirmed Stage IV or recurrent NSCLC (per the 7th International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer [ASLC] classification), ECOG performance status 0 or 1, and no prior anticancer therapy. Patients were enrolled regardless of their tumor PD-L1 status. Patients with known EGFR mutations or ALK translocations sensitive to available targeted inhibitor therapy, untreated brain metastases, carcinomatous meningitis, active autoimmune disease, or medical conditions requiring systemic immunosuppression were excluded from the study. Patients with treated brain metastases were eligible if neurologically returned to baseline at least 2 weeks prior to enrolment, and either off corticosteroids, or on a stable or decreasing dose of <10 mg daily prednisone equivalents.
Primary efficacy results were based on Part 1a of the study, which was limited to patients with PD-L1 tumor expression ≥1%. Tumor specimens were evaluated prospectively using the PD-L1 IHC 28-8 pharmDx assay at a central laboratory. Randomization was stratified by tumor histology (non-squamous versus squamous). The evaluation of efficacy relied on the comparison between:
- YERVOY 1 mg/kg administered intravenously over 30 minutes every 6 weeks in combination with nivolumab 3 mg/kg administered intravenously over 30 minutes every 2 weeks; or
- Platinum-doublet chemotherapy
Chemotherapy regimens consisted of pemetrexed (500 mg/m²) and cisplatin (75 mg/m²) or pemetrexed (500 mg/m²) and carboplatin (AUC 5 or 6) for non-squamous NSCLC or gemcitabine (1000 or 1250 mg/m²) and cisplatin (75 mg/m²) or gemcitabine (1000 mg/m²) and carboplatin (AUC 5) (gemcitabine was administered on Days 1 and 8 of each cycle) for squamous NSCLC. Study treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or for up to 24 months. Treatment continued beyond disease progression if a patient was clinically stable and was considered to be deriving clinical benefit by the investigator. Patients who discontinued combination therapy because of an adverse event attributed to YERVOY were permitted to continue nivolumab as a single agent. Tumor assessments were performed every 6 weeks from the first dose of study treatment for the first 12 months, then every 12 weeks until disease progression or study treatment was discontinued. The primary efficacy outcome measure was OS. Additional
efficacy outcome measures included PFS, ORR, and duration of response as assessed by BICR.
In Part 1a, a total of 793 patients were randomized to receive either YERVOY in combination with nivolumab (n=396) or platinum-doublet chemotherapy (n=397). The median age was 64 years (range: 26 to 87) with 49% of patients ≥65 years and 10% of patients ≥75 years, 76% White, and 65% male. Baseline ECOG performance status was 0 (34%) or 1 (65%), 50% with PD-L1 ≥50%, 29% with squamous and 71% with non-squamous histology, 10% had brain metastases, and 85% were former/current smokers.
The study demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in OS for PD-L1 ≥1% patients randomized to the YERVOY and nivolumab arm compared to platinum-doublet chemotherapy arm. The OS results are presented in Table 33 and Figure 8.
Table 33: Efficacy Results (PD-L1 ≥1%) -CHECKMATE-227 Part 1a
|
YERVOY and Nivolumab
(n=396) |
Platinum-Doublet Chemotherapy
(n=397) |
| Overall Survival |
| Events (%) |
258 (65%) |
298 (75%) |
| Median (months)a |
17.1 |
14.9 |
| (95% CI) |
(15, 20.1) |
(12.7, 16.7) |
| Hazard ratio (95% CI)b |
0.79 (0.67, 0.94) |
| Stratified log-rank p-value |
0.0066 |
a Kaplan-Meier estimate.
b Based on a stratified Cox proportional hazard model. |
Figure 8: Overall Survival (PD-L1 ≥1%) -CHECKMATE-227
BICR-assessed PFS showed a HR of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.97), with a median PFS of 5.1 months (95% CI: 4.1, 6.3) in the YERVOY and nivolumab arm and 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.6, 5.8) in the platinum-doublet chemotherapy arm. The BICR-assessed confirmed ORR was 36% (95% CI: 31, 41) in the YERVOY and nivolumab arm and 30% (95% CI: 26, 35) in the platinum-doublet chemotherapy arm. Median duration of response observed in the YERVOY and nivolumab arm was 23.2 months and 6.2 months in the platinum-doublet chemotherapy arm.
First-line Treatment Of Metastatic Or Recurrent NSCLC: In Combination With Nivolumab And Platinum-Doublet Chemotherapy
CHECKMATE-9LA (NCT03215706) was a randomized, open-label trial in patients with metastatic or recurrent NSCLC. The trial included patients (18 years of age or older) with histologically confirmed Stage IV or recurrent NSCLC (per the 7th International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer classification [IASLC]), ECOG performance status 0 or 1, and no prior anticancer therapy (including EGFR and ALK inhibitors) for metastatic disease. Patients were enrolled regardless of their tumor PD-L1 status. Patients with known EGFR mutations or ALK translocations sensitive to available targeted inhibitor therapy, untreated brain metastases, carcinomatous meningitis, active autoimmune disease, or medical conditions requiring systemic immunosuppression were excluded from the study. Patients with stable brain metastases were eligible for enrollment.
Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either:
- YERVOY 1 mg/kg administered intravenously over 30 minutes every 6 weeks, nivolumab 360 mg administered intravenously over 30 minutes every 3 weeks, and platinum-doublet chemotherapy administered intravenously every 3 weeks for 2 cycles, or
- platinum-doublet chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.
Platinum-doublet chemotherapy consisted of either carboplatin (AUC 5 or 6) and pemetrexed 500 mg/m², or cisplatin 75 mg/m² and pemetrexed 500 mg/m² for non-squamous NSCLC; or carboplatin (AUC 6) and paclitaxel 200 mg/m² for squamous NSCLC. Patients with non-squamous NSCLC in the control arm could receive optional pemetrexed maintenance therapy. Stratification factors for randomization were tumor PD-L1 expression level (≥1% versus <1% or non-quantifiable), histology (squamous versus non-squamous), and sex (male versus female). Study treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or for up to 2 years. Treatment could continue beyond disease progression if a patient was clinically stable and was considered to be deriving clinical benefit by the investigator. Patients who discontinued combination therapy because of an adverse reaction attributed to YERVOY were permitted to continue nivolumab as a single agent as part of the study. Tumor assessments were performed every 6 weeks from the first dose of study treatment for the first 12 months, then every 12 weeks until disease progression or study treatment was discontinued. The primary efficacy outcome measure was OS. Additional efficacy outcome measures included PFS, ORR, and duration of response as assessed by BICR.
A total of 719 patients were randomized to receive either YERVOY in combination with nivolumab and platinum-doublet chemotherapy (n=361) or platinum-doublet chemotherapy (n=358). The median age was 65 years (range: 26 to 86) with 51% of patients ≥65 years and 10% of patients ≥75 years. The majority of patients were White (89%) and male (70%). Baseline ECOG performance status was 0 (31%) or 1 (68%), 57% had tumors with PD-L1 expression ≥1% and 37% had tumors with PD-L1 expression that was <1%, 32% had tumors with squamous histology and 68% had tumors with non-squamous histology, 17% had CNS metastases, and 86% were former or current smokers.
The study demonstrated a statistically significant benefit in OS, PFS, and ORR. Efficacy results from the prespecified interim analysis when 351 events were observed (87% of the planned number of events for final analysis) are presented in Table 34.
Table 34: Efficacy Results -CHECKMATE-9LA
|
YERVOY and Nivolumab and Platinum-Doublet Chemotherapy
(n=361) |
Platinum-Doublet Chemotherapy
(n=358) |
| Overall Survival |
| Events (%) |
156 (43.2) |
195 (54.5) |
| Median (months) |
14.1 |
10.7 |
| (95% CI) |
(13.2, 16.2) |
(9.5, 12.5) |
| Hazard ratio (96.71% CI)a |
0.69 (0.55, 0.87) |
| Stratified log-rank p-valueb |
0.0006 |
| Progression-free Survival per BICR |
| Events (%) |
232 (64.3) |
249 (69.6) |
| Hazard ratio (97.48% CI)a |
0.70 (0.57, 0.86) |
| Stratified log-rank p-valuec |
0.0001 |
| Median (months)d |
6.8 |
5.0 |
| (95% CI) |
(5.6, 7.7) |
(4.3, 5.6) |
| Overall Response Rate per BICR (%) |
38 |
25 |
| (95% CI)e |
(33, 43) |
(21, 30) |
| Stratified CMH test p-valuef |
0.0003 |
| Duration of Response per BICR |
| Median (months) |
10.0 |
5.1 |
| (95% CI)d |
(8.2, 13.0) |
(4.3, 7.0) |
a Based on a stratified Cox proportional hazard model.
b p-value is compared with the allocated alpha of 0.033 for this interim analysis.
c p-value is compared with the allocated alpha of 0.0252 for this interim analysis.
d Kaplan-Meier estimate.
e Confidence interval based on the Clopper and Pearson Method.
f p-value is compared with the allocated alpha of 0.025 for this interim analysis. |
With an additional 4.6 months of follow-up the hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.66 (95% 0.55, 0.80) and median survival was 15.6 months (95% CI: 13.9, 20.0) and 10.9 months (95% 9.5, 12.5) for patients receiving YERVOY and nivolumab and platinum-doublet chemotherapy or platinum-doublet chemotherapy, respectively (Figure 9).
Figure 9: Overall Survival -CHECKMATE-9LA
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
CHECKMATE-743 (NCT02899299) was a randomized, open-label trial in patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma. The trial included patients with histologically confirmed and previously untreated malignant pleural mesothelioma with no palliative radiotherapy within 14 days of initiation of therapy. Patients with interstitial lung disease, active autoimmune disease, medical conditions requiring systemic immunosuppression, or active brain metastasis were excluded from the trial. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either:
- YERVOY 1 mg/kg over 30 minutes by intravenous infusion every 6 weeks and nivolumab 3 mg/kg over 30 minutes by intravenous infusion every 2 weeks for up to 2 years, or
- cisplatin 75 mg/m² and pemetrexed 500 mg/m², or carboplatin 5 AUC and pemetrexed 500 mg/m² administered every 3 weeks for 6 cycles.
Stratification factors for randomization were tumor histology (epithelioid vs. sarcomatoid or mixed histology subtypes) and sex (male vs. female). Study treatment continued for up to 2 years, or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients who discontinued combination therapy because of an adverse reaction attributed to YERVOY were permitted to continue nivolumab as a single agent. Treatment could continue beyond disease progression if a patient was clinically stable and was considered to be deriving clinical benefit by the investigator. Tumor assessments were performed every 6 weeks from the first dose of study treatment for the first 12 months, then every 12 weeks until disease progression or study treatment was discontinued. The primary efficacy outcome measure was OS. Additional efficacy outcome measures included PFS, ORR, and duration of response as assessed by BICR utilizing modified RECIST criteria.
A total of 605 patients were randomized to receive either YERVOY in combination with nivolumab (n=303) or chemotherapy (n=302). The median age was 69 years (range: 25 to 89), with 72% of patients ≥65 years and 26% ≥75 years; 85% were White, 11% were Asian, and 77% were male. Baseline ECOG performance status was 0 (40%) or 1 (60%), 35% had Stage III and 51% had Stage IV disease, 75% had epithelioid and 25% had non-epithelioid histology, 75% had tumors with PD-L1 expression ≥1%, and 22% had tumors with PD-L1 expression <1%.
The trial demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in OS for patients randomized to YERVOY in combination with nivolumab compared to chemotherapy. Efficacy results from the prespecified interim analysis are presented in Table 35 and Figure 10.
Table 35: Efficacy Results -CHECKMATE-743
|
YERVOY and Nivolumab
(n=303) |
Chemotherapy
(n=302) |
| Overall Survivala |
| Events (%) |
200 (66) |
219 (73) |
| Median (months)b |
18.1 |
14.1 |
| (95% CI) |
(16.8, 21.5) |
(12.5, 16.2) |
| Hazard ratio (95% CI)c |
0.74 (0.61, 0.89) |
| Stratified log-rank p-valued |
0.002 |
| Progression-free Survival |
| Events (%) |
218 (72) |
209 (69) |
| Hazard ratio (95% CI)c |
1.0 (0.82, 1.21) |
| Median (months)b |
6.8 |
7.2 |
| (95% CI) |
(5.6, 7.4) |
(6.9, 8.1) |
| Overall Response Ratee |
40% |
43% |
| (95% CI) |
(34, 45) |
(37, 49) |
| Duration of Response |
| Median (months)a |
11.0 |
6.7 |
| (95% CI) |
(8.1, 16.5) |
(5.3, 7.1) |
a At the time of the interim analysis, 419 deaths (89% of the deaths needed for the final analysis) had occurred.
b Kaplan-Meier estimate.
c Stratified Cox proportional hazard model.
d p-value is compared with the allocated alpha of 0.0345 for this interim analysis.
e Based on confirmed response by BICR. |
Figure 10: Overall Survival -CHECKMATE-743
In a prespecified exploratory analysis based on histology, in the subgroup of patients with epithelioid histology, the hazard ratio (HR) for OS was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.68, 1.06), with median OS of 18.7 months in the YERVOY and nivolumab arm and 16.2 months in the chemotherapy arm. In the subgroup of patients with non-epithelioid histology, the HR for OS was 0.46 (95% CI: 0.31, 0.70), with median OS of 16.9 months in the YERVOY and nivolumab arm and 8.8 months in the chemotherapy arm.
Esophageal Cancer
CHECKMATE-648 (NCT03143153) was a randomized, active-controlled, open-label trial in patients with previously untreated unresectable advanced, recurrent or metastatic ESCC (squamous or adenosquamous histology). The trial enrolled patients whose tumor was evaluable for tumor cell (TC) PD-L1 expression [also called PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS)], which was evaluated using the PD-L1 IHC 28-8 pharmDx assay at a central laboratory. Patients were not amenable to chemoradiation or surgery with curative intent. A retrospective scoring of a patient’s tumor PD-L1 status using Combined Positive Score (CPS) was also conducted using the PD-L1Âstained tumor specimens used for randomization. Prior treatment with curative intent was allowed if completed more than six months prior to trial enrollment. The trial excluded patients with brain metastasis that were symptomatic, had active autoimmune disease, used systemic corticosteroids or immunosuppressants, or patients at high risk of bleeding or fistula due to apparent invasion of tumor to organs adjacent to the esophageal tumor. Patients were randomized to receive one of the following treatments:
- YERVOY 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks in combination with nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks.
- Fluorouracil 800 mg/m²/day intravenously on days 1 through 5 (for 5 days), and cisplatin 80 mg/m² intravenously on day 1 (of a 4-week cycle).
Patients were treated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or up to 2 years. Patients who discontinued combination therapy because of an adverse reaction attributed to YERVOY were permitted to continue nivolumab as a single agent.
Randomization was stratified by TC PD-L1 expression (≥1% vs. <1% or indeterminate), region (East Asia vs. Rest of Asia vs. Rest of World), ECOG performance status (0 vs. 1), and number of organs with metastases (≤1 vs. ≥2). The major efficacy outcome measures were OS and BICR-assessed PFS in patients with TC PD-L1 expression ≥1%. Additional efficacy measures included OS in all randomized patients, BICR-assessed PFS in all randomized patients, and ORR assessed by BICR in TC PD-L1 expression ≥1% and in all randomized patients. The tumor assessments per RECIST v1.1 were conducted every 6 weeks up to and including week 48, then every 12 weeks thereafter.
A total of 649 patients were randomized in Arms A and C of the CHECKMATE-648 study, among whom 644 and 601 patients had quantifiable TC PD-L1 expression and CPS at baseline, respectively; 84% (546/649) had tumors with PD-L1 CPS ≥1. The trial population characteristics in patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 were: median age 63 years (range: 26 to 81), 45% were ≥65 years of age, 84% were male, 71% were Asian, 25% were White, and 1.6% were Black or African American. Patients had histological confirmation of squamous cell carcinoma (99%) or adenosquamous cell carcinoma (1.3%) in the esophagus. Baseline ECOG performance status was 0 (46%) or 1 (54%).
A statistically significant improvement in OS was demonstrated in patients randomized to YERVOY in combination with nivolumab compared with chemotherapy; however, an exploratory analysis of OS in patients with PD-L1 CPS <1 showed a HR of 1.0 (95% CI 0.52, 1.94), including that the improvement in the ITT population was primarily attributed to the results observed in the subgroup of patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥1. Efficacy results are shown in Table 36 and Figures 11 and 12.
Table 36: Efficacy Results -Arms A and C of CHECKMATE-648
|
YERVOY and Nivolumab
(n=158) |
Cisplatin and Fluorouracil
(n=157) |
YERVOY and Nivolumab
(n=266) |
Cisplatin and Fluorouracil
(n=280) |
| TC PD-L1 expression ≥1% |
PD-L1 CPS ≥1 |
| Overall Survival |
| Deaths (%) |
106 (67) |
121 (77) |
179 (67) |
205 (73) |
| Median (months) |
13.7 |
9.1 |
12.7 |
9.8 |
| (95% CI) |
(11.2, 17.0) |
(7.7, 10) |
(10.9, 15.5) |
(8.8, 11.6) |
| Hazard ratio (95% |
0.64 |
0.76 |
| CI)b |
(0.49, 0.84) |
(0.62, 0.93) |
| p-valuec |
0.0010S1 |
|
|
| Progression-free Survivala |
| Disease progression or death (%) |
123 (78) |
100 (64) |
206 (77) |
184 (66) |
| Median (months) |
4.0 |
4.4 |
2.8 |
5.6 |
| (95% CI) |
(2.4, 4.9) |
(2.9, 5.8) |
(2.6, 4.2) |
(4.2, 5.9) |
| Hazard ratio (95% |
1.02 |
1.2 |
| CI)b |
(0.78, 1.34) |
(1.0, 1.5) |
| p-valuec |
NS |
|
|
| Overall Response |
56 (35.4) |
31 (19.7) |
74 (28) |
76 (27) |
| Rate, n (%)a, NT |
|
|
|
|
| (95% CI) |
(28.0, 43.4) |
(13.8, 26.8) |
(22.5, 33.6) |
(22.0, 32.8) |
| Complete response(%) |
28 (17.7) |
8 (5.1) |
32 (12.0) |
18 (6.4) |
| Partial response (%) |
28 (17.7) |
23 (14.6) |
42 (15.8) |
58 (20.7) |
| Median |
11.8 |
5.7 |
11.8 |
6.9 |
| (95% CI) |
(7.1, 27.4) |
(4.4, 8.7) |
(7.1, 23.6) |
(5.7, 8.2) |
| Range |
1.4+, 34.5+ |
1.4+, 31.8+ |
1.4+, 34.5+ |
1.4+, 31.8+ |
a Assessed by BICR.
b Based on stratified Cox proportional hazard model. Hazard ratios are reported for each nivolumab-containing arm compared to chemotherapy within each analysis population.
c Based on a stratified 2-sided log-rank test.
S1 Significant p-value compared to stopping boundary of 0.014.
NS: Not Statistically significant, NT: Not evaluated for statistical significance as per pre-specified hierarchical testing procedure. |
Figure 11: Overall Survival -CHECKMATE-648
Figure 12: Progression-free Survival – CHECKMATE-648