CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism Of Action
Tofacitinib is a Janus kinase
(JAK) inhibitor. JAKs are intracellular enzymes which transmit signals arising
from cytokine or growth factor-receptor interactions on the cellular membrane
to influence cellular processes of hematopoiesis and immune cell function.
Within the signaling pathway, JAKs phosphorylate and activate Signal
Transducers and Activators of Transcription (STATs) which modulate
intracellular activity including gene expression. Tofacitinib modulates the
signaling pathway at the point of JAKs, preventing the phosphorylation and
activation of STATs. JAK enzymes transmit cytokine signaling through pairing of
JAKs (e.g., JAK1/JAK3, JAK1/JAK2, JAK1/TyK2, JAK2/JAK2). Tofacitinib inhibited
the in vitro activities of JAK1/JAK2, JAK1/JAK3, and JAK2/JAK2 combinations
with IC50 of 406, 56, and 1377 nM, respectively. However, the relevance
of specific JAK combinations to therapeutic effectiveness is not known.
Pharmacodynamics
Treatment with XELJANZ was associated with dose-dependent
reductions of circulating CD16/56+ natural killer cells, with estimated maximum
reductions occurring at approximately 8-10 weeks after initiation of therapy.
These changes generally resolved within 2-6 weeks after discontinuation of
treatment. Treatment with XELJANZ was associated with dose-dependent increases
in B cell counts. Changes in circulating T-lymphocyte counts and T-lymphocyte
subsets (CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+) were small and inconsistent. The clinical
significance of these changes is unknown.
Total serum IgG, IgM, and IgA levels after 6-month dosing
in patients with rheumatoid arthritis were lower than placebo; however, changes
were small and not dose-dependent.
After treatment with XELJANZ in patients with rheumatoid
arthritis, rapid decreases in serum C-reactive protein (CRP) were observed and
maintained throughout dosing. Changes in CRP observed with XELJANZ treatment do
not reverse fully within 2 weeks after discontinuation, indicating a longer
duration of pharmacodynamic activity compared to the pharmacokinetic half-life.
Similar changes in T cells, B cells, and serum CRP have
been observed in patients with active psoriatic arthritis although
reversibility was not assessed. Total serum immunoglobulins were not assessed
in patients with active psoriatic arthritis.
Pharmacokinetics
XELJANZ
Following oral administration of XELJANZ, peak plasma
concentrations are reached within 0.5-1 hour, elimination half-life is about 3
hours and a dose-proportional increase in systemic exposure was observed in the
therapeutic dose range. Steady state concentrations are achieved in 24-48 hours
with negligible accumulation after twice daily administration.
XELJANZ XR
Following oral administration of XELJANZ XR, peak plasma
concentrations are reached at 4 hours and half-life is about 6 hours. Steady
state concentrations are achieved within 48 hours with negligible accumulation
after once daily administration. AUC and Cmax of tofacitinib for XELJANZ XR 11
mg administered once daily are equivalent to those of XELJANZ 5 mg administered
twice daily.
Absorption
XELJANZ
The absolute oral bioavailability of XELJANZ is 74%.
Coadministration of XELJANZ with a high-fat meal resulted in no changes in AUC
while Cmax was reduced by 32%. In clinical trials, XELJANZ was administered
without regard to meals [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION].
XELJANZ XR
Coadministration of XELJANZ XR with a high-fat meal
resulted in no changes in AUC while Cmax was increased by 27% and Tmax was
extended by approximately 1 hour.
Distribution
After intravenous administration, the volume of
distribution is 87 L. The protein binding of tofacitinib is approximately 40%.
Tofacitinib binds predominantly to albumin and does not appear to bind to α1-acid
glycoprotein. Tofacitinib distributes equally between red blood cells and plasma.
Metabolism And Excretion
Clearance mechanisms for tofacitinib are approximately
70% hepatic metabolism and 30% renal excretion of the parent drug. The
metabolism of tofacitinib is primarily mediated by CYP3A4 with minor
contribution from CYP2C19. In a human radiolabeled study, more than 65% of the
total circulating radioactivity was accounted for by unchanged tofacitinib,
with the remaining 35% attributed to 8 metabolites, each accounting for less
than 8% of total radioactivity. The pharmacologic activity of tofacitinib is
attributed to the parent molecule.
Pharmacokinetics In Patient Populations
Population pharmacokinetic analyses indicated that
pharmacokinetic characteristics were similar between patients with rheumatoid
arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and UC. The coefficient of variation (%) in AUC
of tofacitinib were generally similar across different disease patients,
ranging from 22% to 34% (Table 6).
Table 6: XELJANZ Exposure in Patient Populations at 5
mg Twice Daily and 10 mg Twice Daily Doses
Pharmacokinetic Parametersa Geometric Mean (CV%) |
XELJANZ 5 mg Twice Daily |
XELJANZ 10 mg Twice Daily |
Rheumatoid Arthritis |
Psoriatic Arthritis |
Ulcerative Colitis |
Ulcerative Colitis |
AUC0-24,ss (ng•h/mL) |
504 (22.0%) |
419 (34.1%) |
423 (22.6%) |
807 (24.6%) |
Abbreviations: AUC0-24,ss=area under the plasma
concentration-time curve over 24 hours at steady state; CV=coefficient of
variation.
a Pharmacokinetic
parameters estimated based on population pharmacokinetic analysis. |
Specific Populations
Covariate evaluation as part of
population PK analyses in patient populations indicated no clinically relevant
change in tofacitinib exposure, after accounting for differences in renal
function (i.e., creatinine clearance) between patients, based on age, weight,
gender and race (Figure 1). An approximately linear relationship between body
weight and volume of distribution was observed, resulting in higher peak (Cmax)
and lower trough (Cmin) concentrations in lighter patients. However, this difference
is not considered to be clinically relevant.
The effect of renal and hepatic
impairment and other intrinsic factors on the pharmacokinetics of tofacitinib
is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Impact of Intrinsic Factors on Tofacitinib
Pharmacokinetics
Note: Reference values for weight, age, gender, and race
comparisons are 70 kg, 55 years, male, and white, respectively; reference
groups for renal and hepatic impairment data are subjects with normal renal and
hepatic function.
a [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION] for dosage adjustment in
RA, PsA, and UC patients.
Drug Interaction Studies
Potential For XELJANZ/XELJANZ XR
To Influence The PK Of Other Drugs
In vitro studies indicate that tofacitinib does not significantly
inhibit or induce the activity of the major human drug-metabolizing CYPs
(CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4) at concentrations
corresponding to the steady state Cmax of a 10 mg twice daily dose. These in
vitro results were confirmed by a human drug interaction study showing no
changes in the pharmacokinetics of midazolam, a highly sensitive CYP3A4
substrate, when coadministered with XELJANZ.
In vitro studies indicate that tofacitinib does not significantly
inhibit the activity of the major human drug-metabolizing uridine
5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) [UGT1A1, UGT1A4, UGT1A6,
UGT1A9, and UGT2B7] at concentrations exceeding 250 times the steady state Cmax
of a 10 mg twice daily dose.
In rheumatoid arthritis patients, the oral clearance of
tofacitinib does not vary with time, indicating that tofacitinib does not
normalize CYP enzyme activity in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Therefore,
coadministration with XELJANZ/XELJANZ XR is not expected to result in
clinically relevant increases in the metabolism of CYP substrates in rheumatoid
arthritis patients.
In vitro data indicate that the potential for tofacitinib
to inhibit transporters such as P-glycoprotein, organic anionic or cationic
transporters at therapeutic concentrations is low.
Dosing recommendations for coadministered drugs following
administration with XELJANZ/XELJANZ XR are shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2: Impact of Tofacitinib on the
Pharmacokinetics of Other Drugs
Note: Reference group is
administration of concomitant medication alone; OCT = Organic Cationic
Transporter; MATE = Multidrug and Toxic Compound Extrusion
Potential For Other Drugs To Influence
The Pharmacokinetics Of Tofacitinib
Since tofacitinib is metabolized
by CYP3A4, interaction with drugs that inhibit or induce CYP3A4 is likely.
Inhibitors of CYP2C19 alone or P-glycoprotein are unlikely to substantially
alter the pharmacokinetics of tofacitinib (see Figure 3).
Figure 3: Impact of Other Drugs on the
Pharmacokinetics of Tofacitinib
Note: Reference group is administration of tofactinib alone.
a [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION and DRUG INTERACTIONS]
Clinical Studies
Rheumatoid Arthritis
The XELJANZ clinical development program included two
dose-ranging trials and five confirmatory trials. Although other doses have
been studied, the recommended dose of XELJANZ is 5 mg twice daily.
Dose-Ranging Trials
Dose selection for XELJANZ was based on two pivotal
dose-ranging trials.
Dose-Ranging Study 1 was a 6-month monotherapy trial in
384 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who had an inadequate response to
a DMARD. Patients who previously received adalimumab therapy were excluded.
Patients were randomized to 1 of 7 monotherapy treatments: XELJANZ 1, 3, 5, 10
or 15 mg twice daily, adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously every other week for 10
weeks followed by XELJANZ 5 mg twice daily for 3 months, or placebo.
Dose-Ranging Study 2 was a 6-month trial in which 507
patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who had an inadequate response to MTX
alone received one of 6 dose regimens of XELJANZ (20 mg once daily; 1, 3, 5, 10
or 15 mg twice daily), or placebo added to background MTX.
The results of XELJANZ-treated patients achieving ACR20
responses in Studies 1 and 2 are shown in Figure 4. Although a dose-response
relationship was observed in Study 1, the proportion of patients with an ACR20
response did not clearly differ between the 10 mg and 15 mg doses. In Study 2,
a smaller proportion of patients achieved an ACR20 response in the placebo and
XELJANZ 1 mg groups compared to patients treated with the other XELJANZ doses.
However, there was no difference in the proportion of responders among patients
treated with XELJANZ 3, 5, 10, 15 mg twice daily or 20 mg once daily doses.
Figure 4: Proportion of Patients with ACR20 Response
at Month 3 in Dose-Ranging Studies 1 and 2
Study 1 was a dose-ranging
monotherapy trial not designed to provide comparative effectiveness data and
should not be interpreted as evidence of superiority to adalimumab.
Confirmatory Trials
Study RA-I (NCT00814307) was a
6-month monotherapy trial in which 610 patients with moderate to severe active
rheumatoid arthritis who had an inadequate response to a DMARD (nonbiologic or
biologic) received XELJANZ 5 or 10 mg twice daily or placebo. At the Month 3
visit, all patients randomized to placebo treatment were advanced in a blinded
fashion to a second predetermined treatment of XELJANZ 5 or 10 mg twice daily.
The primary endpoints at Month 3 were the proportion of patients who achieved
an ACR20 response, changes in Health Assessment Questionnaire – Disability
Index (HAQ-DI), and rates of Disease Activity Score DAS28-4(ESR) less than 2.6.
Study RA-II (NCT00856544) was a
12-month trial in which 792 patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid
arthritis who had an inadequate response to a nonbiologic DMARD received
XELJANZ 5 or 10 mg twice daily or placebo added to background DMARD treatment
(excluding potent immunosuppressive treatments such as azathioprine or
cyclosporine). At the Month 3 visit, nonresponding patients were advanced in a
blinded fashion to a second predetermined treatment of XELJANZ 5 or 10 mg twice
daily. At the end of Month 6, all placebo patients were advanced to their
second predetermined treatment in a blinded fashion. The primary endpoints were
the proportion of patients who achieved an ACR20 response at Month 6, changes
in HAQ-DI at Month 3, and rates of DAS28-4(ESR) less than 2.6 at Month 6.
Study RA-III (NCT00853385) was a 12-month trial in 717 patients
with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis who had an inadequate
response to MTX. Patients received XELJANZ 5 or 10 mg twice daily, adalimumab
40 mg subcutaneously every other week, or placebo added to background MTX.
Placebo patients were advanced as in Study II. The primary endpoints were the
proportion of patients who achieved an ACR20 response at Month 6, HAQDI at
Month 3, and DAS28-4(ESR) less than 2.6 at Month 6.
Study RA-IV (NCT00847613) was a 2-year trial with a
planned analysis at 1 year in which 797 patients with moderate to severe active
rheumatoid arthritis who had an inadequate response to MTX received XELJANZ 5
or 10 mg twice daily or placebo added to background MTX. Placebo patients were
advanced as in Study II. The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients
who achieved an ACR20 response at Month 6, mean change from baseline in van der
Heijde-modified total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Month 6, HAQ-DI at Month 3, and
DAS28-4(ESR) less than 2.6 at Month 6.
Study RA-V (NCT00960440) was a 6-month trial in which 399
patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis who had an
inadequate response to at least one approved TNF blocking biologic agent
received XELJANZ 5 or 10 mg twice daily or placebo added to background MTX. At
the Month 3 visit, all patients randomized to placebo treatment were advanced
in a blinded fashion to a second predetermined treatment of XELJANZ 5 or 10 mg
twice daily. The primary endpoints at Month 3 were the proportion of patients
who achieved an ACR20 response, HAQ-DI, and DAS28-4(ESR) less than 2.6.
Study RA-VI (NCT01039688) was a 2-year monotherapy trial
with a planned analysis at 1 year in which 952 MTX-naïve patients with moderate
to severe active rheumatoid arthritis received XELJANZ 5 or 10 mg twice daily
or MTX dose-titrated over 8 weeks to 20 mg weekly. The primary endpoints were
mean change from baseline in van der Heijde-modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS)
at Month 6 and the proportion of patients who achieved an ACR70 response at
Month 6.
Clinical Response
The percentages of XELJANZ-treated patients achieving
ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 responses in Studies RA-I, IV, and V are shown in Table
7. Similar results were observed with Studies RA-II and III. In trials RA-I
through V, patients treated with either 5 or 10 mg twice daily XELJANZ had
higher ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rates versus placebo, with or without
background DMARD treatment, at Month 3 and Month 6. Higher ACR20 response rates
were observed within 2 weeks compared to placebo. In the 12-month trials, ACR
response rates in XELJANZ-treated patients were consistent at 6 and 12 months.
Table 7: Proportion of Patients with an ACR Response
|
Percent of Patients |
Monotherapy in Nonbiologic or Biologic DMARD Inadequate Respondersc |
MTX Inadequate Respondersd |
TNF Blocker Inadequate Responderse |
Study I |
Study IV |
Study V |
PBO |
XELJANZ 5 mg Twice Daily |
XELJANZ 10 mg Twice Dailyf |
PBO + MTX |
XELJANZ 5 mg Twice Daily + MTX |
XELJANZ 10 mg Twice Daily + MTXf |
PBO + MTX |
XELJANZ 5 mg Twice Daily + MTX |
XELJANZ 10 mg Twice Daily + MTXf |
Na |
122 |
243 |
245 |
160 |
321 |
316 |
132 |
133 |
134 |
ACR20 |
Month 3 |
26% |
59% |
65% |
27% |
55% |
67% |
24% |
41% |
48% |
Month 6 |
NAb |
69% |
70% |
25% |
50% |
62% |
NA |
51% |
54% |
ACR50 |
Month 3 |
12% |
31% |
36% |
8% |
29% |
37% |
8% |
26% |
28% |
Month 6 |
NA |
42% |
46% |
9% |
32% |
44% |
NA |
37% |
30% |
ACR70 |
Month 3 |
6% |
15% |
20% |
3% |
11% |
17% |
2% |
14% |
10% |
Month 6 |
NA |
22% |
29% |
1% |
14% |
23% |
NA |
16% |
16% |
a N is number of randomized and treated patients.
b NA Not applicable, as data for placebo treatment is not available
beyond 3 months in Studies I and V due to placebo advancement.
c Inadequate response to at least one DMARD (biologic or
nonbiologic) due to lack of efficacy or toxicity.
d Inadequate response to MTX defined as the presence of sufficient
residual disease activity to meet the entry criteria.
e Inadequate response to a least one TNF blocker due to lack of
efficacy and/or intolerance.
f The recommended dose of XELJANZ is 5 mg twice daily. |
In Study RA-IV, a greater
proportion of patients treated with XELJANZ 5 mg or 10 mg twice daily plus MTX
achieved a low level of disease activity as measured by a DAS28-4(ESR) less
than 2.6 at 6 months compared to those treated with MTX alone (Table 8).
Table 8: Proportion of
Patients with DAS28-4(ESR) Less Than 2.6 with Number of Residual Active Joints
DAS28-4(ESR) Less Than 2.6 |
Study IV |
Placebo + MTX |
XELJANZ 5 mg Twice Daily + MTX |
XELJANZ 10 mg Twice Daily + MTX* |
|
160 |
321 |
316 |
Proportion of responders at Month 6 (n) |
1% (2) |
6% (19) |
13% (42) |
Of responders, proportion with 0 active joints (n) |
50% (1) |
42% (8) |
36% (15) |
Of responders, proportion with 1 active joint (n) |
0 |
5% (1) |
17% (7) |
Of responders, proportion with 2 active joints (n) |
0 |
32% (6) |
7% (3) |
Of responders, proportion with 3 or more active joints (n) |
50% (1) |
21% (4) |
40% (17) |
*The recommended dose of
XELJANZ is 5 mg twice daily. |
The results of the components
of the ACR response criteria for Study RA-IV are shown in Table 9. Similar
results were observed for XELJANZ in Studies RA-I, II, III, V, and VI.
Table 9: Components of ACR
Response at Month 3 Study
Component (mean) a |
Study IV |
XELJANZ 5 mg Twice Daily + MTX
N=321 |
XELJANZ 10 mgd Twice Daily + MTX
N=316 |
Placebo + MTX
N=160 |
Baseline |
Month 3a |
Baseline |
Month 3a |
Baseline |
Month 3a |
Number of tender joints (0-68) |
24 (14) |
13 (14) |
23 (15) |
10 (12) |
23 (13) |
18 (14) |
Number of swollen joints (0-66) |
14 (8) |
6 (8) |
14 (8) |
6 (7) |
14 (9) |
10 (9) |
Painb |
58 (23) |
34 (23) |
58 (24) |
29 (22) |
55 (24) |
47 (24) |
Patient global assessmentb |
58 (24) |
35 (23) |
57 (23) |
29 (20) |
54 (23) |
47 (24) |
Disability index (HAQ-DI)c |
1.41 (0.68) |
0.99 (0.65) |
1.40 (0.66) |
0.84 (0.64) |
1.32 (0.67) |
1.19 (0.68) |
Physician global assessmentb |
59 (16) |
30 (19) |
58 (17) |
24 (17) |
56 (18) |
43 (22) |
CRP (mg/L) |
15.3 (19.0) |
7.1 (19.1) |
17.1 (26.9) |
4.4 (8.6) |
13.7 (14.9) |
14.6 (18.7) |
a Data shown is mean (Standard Deviation) at
Month 3.
b Visual analog scale: 0 = best, 100 = worst.
c Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index: 0 = best, 3 =
worst; 20 questions; categories: dressing and grooming, arising, eating,
walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities.
d The recommended dose of XELJANZ is 5 mg twice daily. |
The percent of ACR20 responders
by visit for Study RA-IV is shown in Figure 5. Similar responses were observed
for XELJANZ in Studies RA-I, II, III, V, and VI.
Figure 5: Percentage of ACR20 Responders by Visit for
Study RA-IV
Radiographic Response
Two studies were conducted to
evaluate the effect of XELJANZ on structural joint damage. In Study RA-IV and
Study RA-VI, progression of structural joint damage was assessed
radiographically and expressed as change from baseline in mTSS and its
components, the erosion score and joint space narrowing score, at Months 6 and
12. The proportion of patients with no radiographic progression (mTSS change less
than or equal to 0) was also assessed.
In Study RA-IV, XELJANZ 10 mg
twice daily plus background MTX reduced the progression of structural damage
compared to placebo plus MTX at Month 6. When given at a dose of 5 mg twice
daily, XELJANZ exhibited similar effects on mean progression of structural
damage (not statistically significant). These results are shown in Table 10.
Analyses of erosion and joint space narrowing scores were consistent with the
overall results.
In the placebo plus MTX group,
74% of patients experienced no radiographic progression at Month 6 compared to
84% and 79% of patients treated with XELJANZ plus MTX 5 or 10 mg twice daily.
In Study RA-VI, XELJANZ
monotherapy inhibited the progression of structural damage compared to MTX at
Months 6 and 12 as shown in Table 10. Analyses of erosion and joint space
narrowing scores were consistent with the overall results.
In the MTX group, 55% of patients experienced no
radiographic progression at Month 6 compared to 73% and 77% of patients treated
with XELJANZ 5 or 10 mg twice daily.
Table 10: Radiographic Changes at Months 6 and 12
|
Study IV |
Placebo
N=139
Mean (SD)a |
XELJANZ 5 mg Twice Daily
N=277
Mean (SD) a |
XELJANZ 5 mg Twice Daily Mean Difference from Placebob (CI) |
XELJANZ 10 mg Twice Dailyd
N=290 Mean (SD) a |
XELJANZ 10 mg Twice Daily Mean Difference from Placebob (CI) |
mTSSc |
|
|
|
|
|
Baseline |
33 (42) |
31 (48) |
- |
37 (54) |
- |
Month 6 |
0.5 (2.0) |
0.1 (1.7) |
-0.3 (-0.7, 0.0) |
0.1 (2.0) |
-0.4 (-0.8, 0.0) |
|
Study VI |
|
MTX
N=166
Mean (SD)a |
XELJANZ 5 mg Twice Daily
N=346
Mean (SD) a |
XELJANZ 5 mg Twice Daily Mean Difference from MTXb (CI) |
XELJANZ 10 mg Twice Dailyd
N=369
Mean (SD) a |
XELJANZ 10 mg Twice Daily Mean Difference from MTXb (CI) |
mTSSc |
|
|
|
|
|
Baseline |
17 (29) |
20 (40) |
- |
19 (39) |
- |
Month 6 |
0.8 (2.7) |
0.2 (2.3) |
-0.7 (-1.0, -0.3) |
0.0 (1.2) |
-0.8 (-1.2, -0.4) |
Month 12 |
1.3 (3.7) |
0.4 (3.0) |
-0.9 (-1.4, -0.4) |
0.0 (1.5) |
-1.3 (-1.8, -0.8) |
a SD = Standard Deviation
b Difference between least squares means XELJANZ minus placebo or
MTX (95% CI = 95% confidence interval)
c Month 6 and Month 12 data are mean change from baseline.
d The recommended dose of XELJANZ is 5 mg twice daily. |
Physical Function Response
Improvement in physical
functioning was measured by the HAQ-DI. Patients receiving XELJANZ 5 and 10 mg
twice daily demonstrated greater improvement from baseline in physical
functioning compared to placebo at Month 3.
The mean (95% CI) difference
from placebo in HAQ-DI improvement from baseline at Month 3 in Study RA-III was
-0.22 (-0.35, -0.10) in patients receiving 5 mg XELJANZ twice daily and 0.32
(-0.44, -0.19) in patients receiving 10 mg XELJANZ twice daily. Similar results
were obtained in Studies RA-I, II, IV and V. In the 12-month trials, HAQ-DI
results in XELJANZ-treated patients were consistent at 6 and 12 months.
Other Health-Related Outcomes
General health status was
assessed by the Short Form health survey (SF-36). In Studies RA-I, IV, and V,
patients receiving XELJANZ 5 mg twice daily or XELJANZ 10 mg twice daily
demonstrated greater improvement from baseline compared to placebo in physical component
summary (PCS), mental component summary (MCS) scores and in all 8 domains of
the SF-36 at Month 3.
Psoriatic Arthritis
The XELJANZ clinical development program to assess
efficacy and safety included 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled confirmatory trials in 816 patients 18 years of age and
older (PsA-I and PsA-II). Although other doses have been studied, the
recommended dose of XELJANZ is 5 mg twice daily. All patients had active
psoriatic arthritis for at least 6 months based upon the Classification
Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR), at least 3 tender/painful joints and
at least 3 swollen joints, and active plaque psoriasis. Patients randomized and
treated across the 2 clinical trials represented different psoriatic arthritis
subtypes at screening, including <5 joints or asymmetric involvement (21%),
≥5 joints involved (90%), distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint involvement
(61%), arthritis mutilans (8%), and spondylitis (19%). Patients in these
clinical trials had a diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis for a mean (SD) of 7.7
(7.2) years. At baseline, 80% and 53% of patients had enthesitis and
dactylitis, respectively. At baseline, all patients were required to receive
treatment with a stable dose of a nonbiologic DMARD (79% received methotrexate,
13% received sulfasalazine, 7% received leflunomide, 1% received other
nonbiologic DMARDs). In both clinical trials, the primary endpoints were the
ACR20 response and the change from baseline in HAQ-DI at Month 3.
Study PsA-I was a 12-month clinical trial in 422 patients
who had an inadequate response to a nonbiologic DMARD (67% and 33% were
inadequate responders to 1 nonbiologic DMARD and ≥2 nonbiologic DMARDs,
respectively) and who were naïve to treatment with a TNF blocker. Patients were
randomized in a 2:2:2:1:1 ratio to receive XELJANZ 5 mg twice daily, XELJANZ 10
mg twice daily, adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously once every 2 weeks, placebo to
XELJANZ 5 mg twice daily treatment sequence, or placebo to XELJANZ 10 mg twice
daily treatment sequence, respectively; study drug was added to background
nonbiologic DMARD treatment. At the Month 3 visit, all patients randomized to
placebo treatment were advanced in a blinded fashion to a predetermined XELJANZ
dose of 5 mg or 10 mg twice daily. Study PsA-I was not designed to demonstrate
noninferiority or superiority to adalimumab.
Study PsA-II was a 6-month clinical trial in 394 patients
who had an inadequate response to at least 1 approved TNF blocker (66%, 19%,
and 15% were inadequate responders to 1 TNF blocker, 2 TNF blockers and
≥3 TNF blockers, respectively). Patients were randomized in a 2:2:1:1
ratio to receive XELJANZ 5 mg twice daily, XELJANZ 10 mg twice daily, placebo
to XELJANZ 5 mg twice daily treatment sequence, or placebo to XELJANZ 10 mg
twice daily treatment sequence, respectively; study drug was added to
background nonbiologic DMARD treatment. At the Month 3 visit, placebo patients
were advanced in a blinded fashion to a predetermined XELJANZ dose of 5 mg or
10 mg twice daily as in Study PsA-I.
Clinical Response
At Month 3, patients treated with either XELJANZ 5 mg or
10 mg twice daily had higher (p≤0.05) response rates versus placebo for
ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 in Study PsA-I and for ACR20 and ACR50 in Study PsA-II;
ACR70 response rates were also higher for both XELJANZ 5 mg or 10 mg twice
daily versus placebo in Study PsA-II, although the differences versus placebo
were not statistically significant (p>0.05) (Tables 11 and 12).
Table 11: Proportion of Patients with an ACR Response
in Study PsA-I* [Nonbiologic DMARD Inadequate Responders (TNF Blocker-Naïve)]
Treatment Group |
Placebo |
XELJANZ 5 mg Twice Daily |
XELJANZ 10 mgbTwice Daily |
Na |
105 |
107 |
104 |
Response |
Response Rate |
Difference (%) 95% CI from Placebo |
Response Rate |
Difference (%) 95% CI from Placebo |
Month 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
ACR20 |
33% |
50% |
17.1
(4.1, 30.2) |
61% |
27.2
(14.2, 40.3) |
ACR50 |
10% |
28% |
18.5
(8.3, 28.7) |
40% |
30.9
(19.9, 41.8) |
ACR70 |
5% |
17% |
12.1
(3.9, 20.2) |
14% |
9.7
(1.8, 17.6) |
Subjects with missing data were treated as
non-responders.
* Subjects received one concomitant nonbiologic DMARD.
a N is number of randomized and treated patients.
b The recommended dose of XELJANZ is 5 mg twice daily. |
Table 12: Proportion of Patients with an ACR Response in Study PsA-II* (TNF Blocker Inadequate Responders)
Treatment Group |
Placebo |
XELJANZ 5 mg Twice Daily |
XELJANZ 10 mgb Twice Daily |
Na |
131 |
131 |
132 |
|
Response Rate |
Response Rate |
Difference (%) 95% CI from Placebo |
Response Rate |
Difference (%) 95% CI from Placebo |
Month 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
ACR20 |
24% |
50% |
26.0
(14.7, 37.2) |
47% |
23.3
(12.1, 34.5) |
ACR50 |
15% |
30% |
15.3
(5.4, 25.2) |
28% |
13.5
(3.8, 23.3) |
ACR70 |
10% |
17% |
6.9
(-1.3, 15.1) |
14% |
4.5
(-3.4, 12.4) |
Subjects with missing data were treated as
non-responders.
* Subjects received one concomitant nonbiologic DMARD.
a N is number of randomized and treated patients.
b The recommended dose of XELJANZ is 5 mg twice daily. |
Improvements from baseline in
the ACR response criteria components for both studies are shown in Table 13.
Table 13: Components of ACR Response at Baseline and
Month 3 in Studies PsA-I and PsA-II
|
Nonbiologic DMARD Inadequate Responders (TNF Blocker-Naive) |
TNF Blocker Inadequate Responders |
Study PsA-I* |
Study PsA-II* |
Treatment Group |
Placebo |
XELJANZ 5 mg Twice Daily |
XELJANZ 10 mgd Twice Daily |
Placebo |
XELJANZ 5 mg Twice Daily |
XELJANZ 10 mgd Twice Daily |
N at Baseline |
105 |
107 |
104 |
131 |
131 |
132 |
ACR Componenta |
Number of tender/painful joints (0-68) |
Baseline |
20.6 |
20.5 |
20.3 |
19.8 |
20.5 |
25.5 |
Month 3 |
14.6 |
12.2 |
9.9 |
15.1 |
11.5 |
14.5 |
Number of swollen joints (0-66) |
Baseline |
11.5 |
12.9 |
11.7 |
10.5 |
12.1 |
12.8 |
Month 3 |
7.1 |
6.3 |
4.3 |
7.7 |
4.8 |
6.1 |
Patient assessment of arthritis painb |
Baseline |
53.2 |
55.7 |
54.4 |
54.9 |
56.4 |
59.5 |
Month 3 |
44.7 |
34.7 |
28.5 |
48.0 |
36.1 |
38.1 |
Patient global assessment of arthritisb |
Baseline |
53.9 |
54.7 |
53.6 |
55.8 |
57.4 |
58.5 |
Month 3 |
44.4 |
35.5 |
29.8 |
49.2 |
36.9 |
38.8 |
HAQ-DIc |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baseline |
1.11 |
1.16 |
1.08 |
1.25 |
1.26 |
1.37 |
Month 3 |
0.95 |
0.81 |
0.71 |
1.09 |
0.88 |
1.03 |
Physician’s Global Assessment of Arthritisb |
Baseline |
53.8 |
54.6 |
55.2 |
53.7 |
53.5 |
55.8 |
Month 3 |
35.4 |
29.5 |
23.6 |
36.4 |
27.0 |
25.6 |
CRP (mg/L) Baseline |
10.4 |
10.5 |
8.1 |
12.1 |
13.8 |
15.0 |
Month 3 |
8.6 |
4.0 |
2.7 |
11.4 |
7.7 |
7.3 |
* Subjects received one concomitant nonbiologic DMARD.
a Data shown are mean value at baseline and at Month 3.
b Visual analog scale (VAS): 0 = best, 100 = worst.
c HAQ-DI = Health Assessment Questionnaire – Disability Index: 0 =
best, 3 = worst; 20 questions; categories: dressing and grooming, arising,
eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities.
d The recommended dose of XELJANZ is 5 mg twice daily. |
The percentage of ACR20
responders by visit for Study PsA-I is shown in Figure 6. Similar responses were
observed in Study PsA-II. In both studies, improvement in ACR20 response on
XELJANZ was observed at the first visit after baseline (Week 2).
Figure 6: Percentage of ACR20 Responders by Visit
Through Month 3 in Study PsA-I*
BID=twice daily; SE=standard
error.
Subjects with missing data were treated as non-responders.
* Subjects received one concomitant nonbiologic DMARD. The recommended dose of
XELJANZ is 5 mg twice daily.
In patients with active
psoriatic arthritis evidence of benefit in enthesitis and dactylitis was
observed with XELJANZ treatment.
Physical Function
Improvement in physical
functioning was measured by the HAQ-DI. Patients receiving XELJANZ 5 mg or 10
mg twice daily demonstrated significantly greater improvement (p ≤0.05)
from baseline in physical functioning compared to placebo at Month 3 (Table
14).
Table 14: Change from Baseline in HAQ-DI in Studies
PsA-I and PsA-II
Treatment Group |
Least Squares Mean Change from Baseline In HAQ-DI at Month 3 |
Nonbiologic DMARD Inadequate Respondersb (TNF Blocker-Naive) |
TNF Blocker Inadequate Respondersc |
Study PsA-I* |
Study PsA-II* |
Placebo |
XELJANZ 5 mg Twice Daily |
XELJANZ 10 mgd Twice Daily |
Placebo |
XELJANZ 5 mg Twice Daily |
XELJANZ 10 mgd Twice Daily |
Na |
104 |
107 |
104 |
131 |
129 |
132 |
LSM Change from Baseline |
-0.18 |
-0.35 |
-0.40 |
-0.14 |
-0.39 |
-0.35 |
Difference from Placebo (95% CI) |
- |
-0.17
(-0.29, -0.05) |
-0.22
(-0.34, -0.10) |
- |
-0.25
(-0.38, -0.13) |
-0.22
(-0.34, -0.09) |
* Subjects received one concomitant nonbiologic DMARD.
a N is the total number of subjects in the statistical analysis.
b Inadequate response to at least one nonbiologic DMARD due to lack
of efficacy and/or intolerability.
c Inadequate response to at least one TNF blocker due to lack of
efficacy and/or intolerability.
d The recommended dose of XELJANZ is 5 mg twice daily. |
In Study PsA-I, the HAQ-DI responder rate (response
defined as having improvement from baseline of ≥0.35) at Month 3 was 53%
in patients receiving XELJANZ 5 mg twice daily, 55% in patients receiving
XELJANZ 10 mg twice daily, and 31% in patients receiving placebo. Similar responses
were observed in Study PsA-II.
Other Health-Related Outcomes
General health status was
assessed by the Short Form health survey (SF-36). In Studies PsA-I and PsA-II,
patients receiving XELJANZ 5 mg twice daily or XELJANZ 10 mg twice daily had greater
improvement from baseline compared to placebo in Physical Component Summary
(PCS) score, but not in Mental Component Summary (MCS) score at Month 3.
Patients receiving XELJANZ 5 mg twice daily reported consistently greater
improvement relative to placebo in the domains of Physical Functioning, Bodily
Pain, Vitality, and Social Functioning, but not in Role Physical, General
Health, Role Emotional, or Mental Health.
Radiographic Response
Treatment effect on inhibition
of radiographic progression in psoriatic arthritis could not be established
from the results of Study PsA-I.
Ulcerative Colitis
Induction Trials (Study UC-I
[NCT01465763] And Study UC-II [NCT01458951])
In two identical induction
trials (UC-I and UC-II), 1139 patients were randomized (598 and 541 patients,
respectively) to XELJANZ 10 mg twice daily or placebo with a 4:1 treatment
allocation ratio. These trials included adult patients with moderately to
severely active UC (total Mayo score of 6 to 12, with an endoscopy subscore of
at least 2, and rectal bleeding subscore of at least 1) and who had failed or
were intolerant to at least 1 of the following treatments: oral or intravenous
corticosteroids, azathioprine, 6-MP or TNF blocker.
The disease activity was assessed by Mayo scoring index
(0 to 12) which consists of four subscores (0 to 3 for each subscore): stool
frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on endoscopy, and physician global
assessment. An endoscopy subscore of 2 was defined by marked erythema, absent
vascular pattern, any friability, and erosions; an endoscopy subscore of 3 was
defined by spontaneous bleeding and ulceration.
Patients were permitted to use stable doses of oral
aminosalicylates and corticosteroids (prednisone daily dose up to 25 mg
equivalent). Concomitant immunosuppressants (oral immunomodulators or biologic
therapies) were not permitted for UC patients during these studies.
A total of 52%, 73% and 72% of patients had previously
failed or were intolerant to TNF blockers (51% in Study UC-1 and 52% in Study
UC-II), corticosteroids (75% in Study UC-I and 71% in Study UC-II), and/or
immunosuppressants (74% in Study UC-I and 70% in Study UC-II), respectively.
Oral corticosteroids were received as concomitant treatment
for UC by 47% of patients (45% in Study UC-I and 48% in Study UC-II) and 71%
were receiving concomitant aminosalicylates as treatment for UC (71% in Study
UC-I, and 72% in Study UC-II). The baseline clinical characteristics were
generally similar between the XELJANZ treated patients and patients receiving
placebo.
The primary endpoint of Study UC-I and Study UC-II was
the proportion of patients in remission at Week 8, and the key secondary
endpoint was the proportion of patients with improvement of endoscopic
appearance of the mucosa at Week 8.
The efficacy results of Study UC-I and Study UC-II based
on the centrally read endoscopy results are shown in Table 15.
Table 15: Proportion of Patients Meeting Primary and
Key Secondary Efficacy Endpoints at Week 8 (Induction Study UC-I and Study
UC-II, Central Endoscopy Read)
Study UC-I |
Endpoint |
Placebo |
XELJANZ 10 mg Twice Daily |
Treatment Difference versus Placebo (95% CI) |
Remission at Week 8a |
Total Population |
N=122 8% |
N=476 18% |
10%* (4.3, 16.3) |
With Prior TNF Blocker Failureb |
N=64 2% |
N=243 11% |
|
Without Prior TNF Blocker Failure3 |
N=58 16% |
N=233 26% |
|
Improvement of endoscopic appearance of the mucosa at Week 84 |
Total Population |
N=122 16% |
N=476 31% |
16%** (8.1, 23.4) |
With Prior TNF Blocker Failureb |
N=64 6% |
N=243 23% |
|
Without Prior TNF Blocker Failurec |
N=58 26% |
N=233 40% |
|
Study UC-II |
Endpoint |
Placebo |
XELJANZ 10 mg Twice Daily |
Treatment Difference (95% CI) |
Remission at Week 8a |
Total Population |
N=112 4% |
N=429 17% |
13%** (8.1, 17.9) |
With Prior TNF Blocker Failureb |
N=60 0% |
N=222 12% |
|
Without Prior TNF Blocker Failurec |
N=52 8% |
N=207 22% |
|
Improvement of endoscopic appearance of the mucosa at Week 8d |
Total Population |
N=112 12% |
N-429 28% |
17%** (9.5, 24.1) |
With Prior TNF Blocker Failureb |
N=60 7% |
N=222 22% |
|
Without Prior TNF Blocker Failurec |
N=52 17% |
N=207 36% |
|
* p-value <0.01, ** p-value <0.001. CI = Confidence
interval; N = number of patients in the analysis set; TNF = tumor necrosis
factor
a Remission was defined as clinical remission (a Mayo score ≤2
with no individual subscore >1) and rectal bleeding subscore of 0.
b Prior TNF blocker failure was defined in this program as inadequate
response, loss of response, or intolerance to TNF blocker therapy.
c Patients in this group had failed one or more conventional
therapies (corticosteroid, azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine) but did not have
history of prior failure of TNF blocker therapy.
d Improvement of endoscopic appearance of the mucosa was defined as
Mayo endoscopy subscore of 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (erythema,
decreased vascular pattern). |
Clinical Response At Week 8
Clinical response was defined
as a decrease from baseline in Mayo score of ≥3 points and ≥30%,
with an accompanying decrease in the subscore for rectal bleeding of ≥1
point or absolute subscore for rectal bleeding of 0 or 1.
Clinical response was observed in 60% of patients treated
with XELJANZ 10 mg twice daily compared to 33% of placebo patients in Study
UC-I and 55% compared to 29% in Study UC-II.
Normalization Of The Endoscopic Appearance Of The Mucosa At
Week 8
Normalization of endoscopic appearance of the mucosa was
defined as a Mayo endoscopic subscore of 0 and was observed in 7% of patients
treated with XELJANZ 10 mg twice daily compared to 2% of placebo patients in
both Studies UC-I and UC-II.
Rectal Bleeding And Stool Frequency
Decreases in rectal bleeding and stool frequency
subscores were observed as early as Week 2 in patients treated with XELJANZ.
Maintenance Trial (Study UC-III [NCT01458574])
A total of 593 patients who completed the induction
trials (UC-I or UC-II) and achieved clinical response were re-randomized with
1:1:1 treatment allocation ratio to XELJANZ 5 mg twice daily, XELJANZ 10 mg
twice daily, or placebo for 52 weeks in Study UC-III. As in the induction
trials, patients were permitted to use stable doses of oral aminosalicylates;
however, corticosteroid tapering was required upon entrance into this study for
patients who were receiving corticosteroids at baseline. Concomitant
immunosuppressants (oral immunomodulators or biologic therapies) were not
permitted.
At baseline of Study UC-III:
- 179 (30%) patients were in remission
- 289 (49%) patients were receiving oral corticosteroids
- 265 (45%), 445 (75%), and 413 (70%) patients had
previously failed or were intolerant to
TNF blocker therapy, corticosteroids, and
immunosuppressants, respectively.
The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients in
remission at Week 52. There were 2 key secondary endpoints: the proportion of
patients with improvement of endoscopic appearance at Week 52, and the
proportion of patients with sustained corticosteroid-free remission at both
Week 24 and Week 52 among patients in remission at baseline of Study UC-III.
The efficacy results of Study UC-III based on the
centrally read endoscopy results are summarized in Table 16.
Table 16: Proportion of Patients Meeting Primary and
Key Secondary Efficacy Endpoints in Maintenance Study UC-III (Central Endoscopy
Read)
Endpoint |
Placebo |
XELJANZ 5 mg Twice Daily |
XELJANZ 10 mg Twice Daily |
Treatment Difference versus Placebo (95% CI) |
XELJANZ 5 mg Twice Daily |
XELJANZ 10 mg Twice Daily |
Remission at Week 52a |
Total Population |
N=198 |
N=198 |
N=197 |
23%* |
30%* |
11% |
34% |
41% |
(15.3, 31.2) |
(21.4, 37.6) |
With Prior TNF Blocker Failureb |
N=89 |
N=83 |
N=93 |
|
|
11% |
24% |
37% |
|
|
Without Prior TNF Blocker Failurec |
N=109 |
N=115 |
N=104 |
|
|
11% |
42% |
44% |
|
|
Improvement of endoscopic appearance of the mucosa at Week 52d |
Total Population |
N=198 |
N=198 |
N=197 |
24%* |
33%* |
13% |
37% |
46% |
(16.0, 32.5) |
(24.2, 41.0) |
With Prior TNF Blocker Failureb |
N=89 |
N=83 |
N=93 |
|
|
12% |
30% |
40% |
|
|
Without Prior TNF Blocker Failurec |
N=109 |
N=115 |
N=104 |
|
|
14% |
43% |
51% |
|
|
Sustained corticosteroid-free remission at both Week 24 and Week 52 among patients in remission at baselinee |
Total Population |
N=59 |
N=65 |
N=55 |
30%* |
42%* |
5% |
35% |
47% |
(17.4, 43.2) |
(27.9, 56.5) |
With Prior TNF Blocker Failureb |
N=21 |
N=18 |
N=18 |
|
|
5% |
22% |
39% |
|
|
Without Prior TNF Blocker Failurec |
N=38 |
N=47 |
N=37 |
|
|
5% |
40% |
51% |
|
|
* p-value <0.0001. CI = Confidence interval; N =
number of patients in the analysis set; TNF = tumor necrosis factor.
a Remission was defined as clinical remission (a Mayo score ≤2
with no individual subscore >1) and rectal bleeding subscore of 0.
b Prior TNF blocker failure was defined in this program as
inadequate response, loss of response, or intolerance to TNF blocker therapy.
c Patients in this group had failed one or more conventional
therapies (corticosteroid, azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine) but did not have
history of prior failure of TNF blocker therapy.
d Improvement of endoscopic appearance of the mucosa was defined as
Mayo endoscopy subscore of 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (erythema,
decreased vascular pattern).
e Sustained corticosteroid-free remission was defined as being in
remission and not taking corticosteroids for at least 4 weeks prior to the
visit at both Week 24 and Week 52. |
Maintenance Of Clinical Response
Maintenance of clinical
response was defined as the proportion of patients who met the definition of
clinical response (defined as a decrease from the induction study (UC-I, UC-II)
baseline Mayo score of ≥3 points and ≥30%, with an
accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥1 point or
rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1) at both Baseline and Week 52 of Study
UC-III.
Maintenance of clinical response was observed in 52% in
the XELJANZ 5 mg twice daily group and 62% in the XELJANZ 10 mg twice daily
group compared to 20% of placebo patients.
Maintenance Of Remission (Among Patients In Remission At Baseline)
In the 179 patients who were in remission at baseline of
Study UC-III (N = 59 for placebo, N = 65 for XELJANZ 5 mg twice daily, N = 55
for XELJANZ 10 mg twice daily), 46% in the XELJANZ 5 mg twice daily group and
56% in the XELJANZ 10 mg twice daily group maintained remission at Week 52
compared to 10% of placebo patients.
Normalization Of The Endoscopic Appearance Of The Mucosa
Normalization of endoscopic appearance of the mucosa was
defined as a Mayo endoscopic subscore of 0 and was observed at Week 52 in 15%
of patients in the XELJANZ 5 mg twice daily group and 17% of patients in the
XELJANZ 10 mg twice daily group compared to 4% of placebo patients.
Open-label Extension Study (Study UC-IV [NCT01470612])
In Study UC-IV, 914 patients were treated of which 156
received 5 mg twice daily and 758 received 10 mg twice daily.
Of the 905 patients who were assigned to XELJANZ 10 mg
twice daily in the 8-week induction studies (Study UC-I or Study UC-II), 322
patients completed the induction studies but did not achieve clinical response.
Of these 322 patients, 291 continued to receive XELJANZ 10 mg twice daily
(unblinded) and had available data after an additional 8 weeks in Study UC-IV.
After 8 additional weeks (a total of 16 weeks treatment), 149 patients achieved
clinical response, and 25 patients achieved remission (based on central
endoscopy read). Among those 144 patients who achieved clinical response by 16
weeks and had available data at Week 52, 65 patients achieved remission (based
on local endoscopy read) after continued treatment with XELJANZ 10 mg twice
daily for 52 weeks.