Clinical Pharmacology for Vocabria
Mechanism Of Action
Cabotegravir is an HIV-1 antiretroviral drug [see Microbiology].
Pharmacodynamics
Cardiac Electrophysiology
At a dose of cabotegravir 150 mg orally every 12 hours (10 times the recommended total daily oral lead-in dosage of VOCABRIA), the QT interval is not prolonged to any clinically relevant extent. Administration of 3 doses of cabotegravir 150 mg orally every 12 hours resulted in a geometric mean Cmax approximately 2.8-fold above the geometric mean steady-state Cmax associated with the recommended 30-mg dose of oral cabotegravir.
For additional QT information related to the injectable formulations of cabotegravir and rilpivirine (CABENUVA), the injectable formulation of cabotegravir (APRETUDE), and the oral formulation of rilpivirine (EDURANT), refer to the prescribing information for CABENUVA, APRETUDE, and EDURANT.
Pharmacokinetics
Absorption, Distribution, And Elimination
The pharmacokinetic properties of cabotegravir are provided in Table 2. The multiple-dose pharmacokinetic parameters are provided in Table 3.
Table 2: Pharmacokinetic Properties of Cabotegravir
| Absorption |
| Tmax (h), median |
3 |
| Effect of high-fat meal (relative to fasting): |
1.14 |
| AUC(0-inf) ratioa |
(1.02, 1.28) |
| Distribution |
| % Bound to human plasma proteins |
>99.8 |
| Blood-to-plasma ratio |
0.52 |
| CSF-to-plasma concentration ratio (median [range])b |
0.003 (0.002 to 0.004) |
| Elimination |
| t½ (h), mean |
41 |
| Metabolism |
| Metabolic pathways |
UGT1A1 UGT1A9 (minor) |
| Excretion |
| Major route of elimination |
Metabolism |
| % of dose excreted as total 14C (unchanged drug) in urineb |
27 (0) |
| % of dose excreted as total 14C (unchanged drug) in fecesb |
59 (47) |
CSF = Cerebrospinal fluid.
a Geometric mean ratio (fed/fasted) in pharmacokinetic parameters and 90% confidence interval. High-calorie/high-fat meal = 870 kcal, 53% fat.
b Dosing in mass balance studies: single-dose oral administration of [14C] cabotegravir. |
Table 3: Multiple-Dose Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Oral Cabotegravir in Adults
| Parameter |
Geometric Mean (5th, 95th Percentile)a |
| Cmax (mcg/mL) |
8.0 (5.3, 11.9) |
| AUC(0-tau) (mcg*h/mL)b |
145 (93.5, 224) |
| Ctau (mcg/mL)b |
4.6 (2.8, 7.5) |
a Pharmacokinetic parameter values were based on individual post-hoc estimates from the final population pharmacokinetic model for participants receiving 30 mg of oral cabotegravir once daily in FLAIR and ATLAS trials.
b tau is dosing interval: 24 hours for oral cabotegravir. |
Specific Populations
No clinically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of cabotegravir were observed based on age, sex, race/ethnicity, body mass index, or UGT1A1 polymorphisms. The effect of hepatitis B and C virus co-infection on the pharmacokinetics of cabotegravir is unknown.
Renal Impairment
No clinically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of cabotegravir are expected with mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment. Cabotegravir has not been studied in patients with end-stage renal disease not on dialysis. As cabotegravir is >99% protein bound, dialysis is not expected to alter exposures of cabotegravir [see Use In Specific Populations].
Hepatic Impairment
No clinically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of cabotegravir are expected in mild to moderate (Child-Pugh A or B) hepatic impairment. The effect of severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh C) on the pharmacokinetics of cabotegravir has not been studied [see Use In Specific Populations].
Gender
Population pharmacokinetic analyses revealed no clinically relevant effect of gender on the exposure of cabotegravir. In addition, no clinically relevant differences in plasma cabotegravir concentrations were observed in PrEP studies by gender, including cisgender men and transgender women (+/-hormone use). Therefore, no dose adjustment is necessary based on gender.
Geriatric Patients
No dose adjustment is required in elderly individuals. There are limited data available on the use of cabotegravir in individuals aged 65 years and older. In general, caution should be exercised in administration of cabotegravir in elderly individuals, reflecting greater frequency of decreased hepatic, renal, or cardiac function and of concomitant disease or other drug therapy [see Use In Specific Populations].
Pediatric Patients
Population pharmacokinetic analyses revealed no clinically relevant differences in exposure between adolescent participants (weighing ≥35 kg) and adult participants with and without HIV-1 from the cabotegravir development program; therefore, no dosage adjustment is needed for adolescents weighing ≥35 kg (Table 4).
Table 4: Pharmacokinetic Parameters following Once-Daily Oral Cabotegravir in Adolescents Aged 12 to Younger than 18 Years (≥35 kg)
| Parameter |
Geometric Mean (5th, 95th Percentile)a |
| Cmax (mcg/mL) |
10.7 (7.36, 16.6) |
| AUC(0-tau) (mcg•h/mL)b |
203 (136, 320) |
| Ctau (mcg/mL)b |
6.43 (4.15, 10.5) |
a Pharmacokinetic parameter values were based on individual post-hoc estimates from population pharmacokinetic models in both adolescents with HIV-1 (n = 147) weighing 35.2 to 98.5 kg and adolescents without HIV-1 (n = 62) weighing 39.9 to 167 kg.
b tau is dosing interval: 24 hours for oral administration. |
Drug Interaction Studies
Cabotegravir is not a clinically relevant inhibitor of the following enzymes and transporters: cytochrome P450 (CYP)1A2, 2A6, 2B6, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, and 3A4; UGT1A1, 1A3, 1A4, 1A6, 1A9, 2B4, 2B7, 2B15, and 2B17; P-glycoprotein (P-gp); breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP); bile salt export pump (BSEP); organic cation transporter (OCT)1, OCT2; organic anion transporter polypeptide (OATP)1B1, OATP1B3; multidrug and toxin extrusion transporter (MATE) 1, MATE 2-K; and multidrug resistance protein (MRP)2 or MRP4.
In vitro, cabotegravir inhibited renal OAT1 (IC50 = 0.81 microM) and OAT3 (IC50 = 0.41 microM). Based on physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling, cabotegravir may increase the AUC of OAT1/3 substrates up to approximately 80%.
In vitro, cabotegravir did not induce CYP1A2, CYP2B6, or CYP3A4.
Simulations using PBPK modeling show that no clinically significant interaction is expected during coadministration of cabotegravir with drugs that inhibit UGT1A1.
In vitro, cabotegravir was not a substrate of OATP1B1, OATP1B3, OATP2B1, or OCT1.
Cabotegravir is a substrate of P-gp and BCRP in vitro; however, because of its high permeability, no alteration in cabotegravir absorption is expected with coadministration of P-gp or BCRP inhibitors.
The effects of coadministered drugs on the exposure of cabotegravir are summarized in Table 5, and the effects of cabotegravir on the exposure of coadministered drugs are summarized in Table 6.
Table 5: Effect of Coadministered Drugs on the Pharmacokinetics of Cabotegravir
| Coadministered Drug(s) and Dose(s) |
Dose of Cabotegravir |
n |
Geometric Mean Ratio (90% CI) of Cabotegravir Pharmacokinetic Parameters with/without Coadministered Drugs No Effect = 1.00 |
| Cmax |
AUC |
Ctau or C24 |
| Etravirine 200 mg twice daily |
30 mg once daily |
12 |
1.04
(0.99, 1.09) |
1.01
(0.96, 1.06) |
1.00
(0.94, 1.06) |
| Rifabutin 300 mg once daily |
30 mg once daily |
12 |
0.83
(0.76, 0.90) |
0.79
(0.74, 0.83) |
0.74
(0.70, 0.78) |
| Rifampin 600 mg once daily |
30-mg single dose |
15 |
0.94
(0.87, 1.02) |
0.41
(0.36, 0.46) |
0.50
(0.44, 0.57) |
| Rilpivirine 25 mg once daily |
30 mg once daily |
11 |
1.05
(0.96, 1.15) |
1.12
(1.05, 1.19) |
1.14
(1.04, 1.24) |
| n = Maximum number of participants with data, CI = Confidence Interval. |
Table 6: Effect of Cabotegravir on the Pharmacokinetics of Coadministered Drugs
| Coadministered Drug(s) and Dose(s) |
Dose of Cabotegravir |
n |
Geometric Mean Ratio (90% CI) of Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Coadministered Drug with/without Cabotegravir No Effect = 1.00 |
| Cmax |
AUC |
Ctau or C24 |
| Ethinyl estradiol 0.03 mg once daily |
30 mg once daily |
19 |
0.92
(0.83, 1.03) |
1.02
(0.97, 1.08) |
1.00
(0.92, 1.10) |
| Levonorgestrel 0.15 mg once daily |
30 mg once daily |
19 |
1.05
(0.96, 1.15) |
1.12
(1.07, 1.18) |
1.07
(1.01, 1.15) |
| Midazolam 3 mg |
30 mg once daily |
12 |
1.09
(0.94, 1.26) |
1.10
(0.95, 1.26) |
NA |
| Rilpivirine 25 mg once daily |
30 mg once daily |
11 |
0.96
(0.85, 1.09) |
0.99
(0.89, 1.09) |
0.92
(0.79, 1.07) |
| n = Maximum number of participants with data, CI = Confidence Interval, NA = Not available. |
Microbiology
Mechanism Of Action
Cabotegravir inhibits HIV integrase by binding to the integrase active site and blocking the strand transfer step of retroviral deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) integration that is essential for the HIV replication cycle. The mean 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) value of cabotegravir in a strand transfer assay using purified recombinant HIV-1 integrase was 3.0 nM.
Antiviral Activity In Cell Culture
Cabotegravir exhibited antiviral activity against laboratory strains of HIV-1 (subtype B, n = 4) with mean 50 percent effective concentration (EC50) values of 0.22 to 1.7 nM in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and 293 cells. Cabotegravir demonstrated antiviral activity in PBMCs against a panel of 24 HIV-1 clinical isolates (3 in each of group M subtypes A, B, C, D, E, F, and G and 3 in group O) with a median EC50 value of 0.19 nM (range: 0.02 to 1.06 nM, n = 24). The median EC50 value against subtype B clinical isolates was 0.05 nM (range: 0.02 to 0.50 nM, n = 3). Against clinical HIV-2 isolates, the median EC50 value was 0.12 nM (range: 0.10 to 0.14 nM, n = 3).
In cell culture, cabotegravir was not antagonistic in combination with the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) rilpivirine, or the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) emtricitabine (FTC), lamivudine (3TC), or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF).
Resistance
Cell Culture
Cabotegravir-resistant viruses were selected during passage of HIV-1 strain IIIB in MT-2 cells in the presence of cabotegravir. Amino acid substitutions in integrase that emerged and conferred decreased susceptibility to cabotegravir included Q146L (fold change: 1.3 to 4.6), S153Y (fold change: 2.8 to 8.4), and I162M (fold change: 2.8). The integrase substitution T124A also emerged alone (fold change: 1.1 to 7.4 in cabotegravir susceptibility), in combination with S153Y (fold change: 3.6 to 6.6 in cabotegravir susceptibility) or I162M (2.8-fold change in cabotegravir susceptibility). Cell culture passage of virus harboring integrase substitutions Q148H, Q148K, or Q148R selected for additional substitutions (C56S, V72I, L74M, V75A, T122N, E138K, G140S, G149A, and M154I), with substituted viruses having reduced susceptibility to cabotegravir of 2.0- to 410-fold change. The combinations of E138K+Q148K and V72I+E138K+Q148K conferred the greatest reductions of 53- to 260-fold change and 410-fold change, respectively.
Clinical Trials
Treatment of HIV-1 Infection: In the pooled Phase 3 FLAIR (Week 124) and ATLAS (Week 96) analysis, there were 8 confirmed virologic failures (2 consecutive HIV-1 RNA ≥200 copies/mL) on cabotegravir plus rilpivirine (8/591, 1.4%) and 8 confirmed virologic failures on current antiretroviral regimen (8/591, 1.4%). Of the 8 confirmed virologic failures in the cabotegravir plus rilpivirine arm, 7 (88%) had treatment-emergent NNRTI resistance-associated substitutions K101E, V106V/A, V108I, E138A, E138G, E138K, H221H/L, or M230L in reverse transcriptase, and 6 of them showed reduced phenotypic susceptibility to rilpivirine (range: 2- to 27-fold). One additional participant in the ATLAS Extension Switch on cabotegravir plus rilpivirine had emergent NNRTI resistance substitution E138A at Week 80 with HIV-1 RNA >50 copies/mL and <200 copies/mL.
Additionally, 5 of the 8 (63%) cabotegravir plus rilpivirine confirmed virologic failures had treatment-emergent INSTI resistance-associated substitutions and reduced phenotypic susceptibility to cabotegravir: Q148R (n = 2; 5- and 9-fold decreased susceptibility to cabotegravir), G140R (n = 1; 7-fold decreased susceptibility to cabotegravir), N155H (n = 1; 3-fold decreased susceptibility to cabotegravir), or N155H+R263K (n = 1; 9-fold decreased susceptibility to cabotegravir).
There was another confirmed virologic failure participant at Week 112 in FLAIR who had switched to cabotegravir plus rilpivirine direct to injection at Week 100; there were no INSTI resistance-associated substitutions detected at failure.
In comparison, in the current antiretroviral regimen arm with 8 confirmed virologic failures, 2 of 7 (29%) who had post-baseline resistance data had treatment-emergent resistance substitutions and phenotypic resistance to their antiretroviral drugs; both had treatment-emergent NRTI substitutions, M184V or I, which conferred resistance to emtricitabine or lamivudine in their regimen, and one of them also had the treatment-emergent NNRTI resistance substitution G190S, which conferred resistance to efavirenz in their regimen.
In the ATLAS-2M trial, there were 11 confirmed virologic failures (2 consecutive HIV-1 RNA ≥200 copies/mL) through Week 48: 9 participants (1.7%) in the every-2-month treatment arm and 2 participants (0.4%) in the monthly treatment arm. Of note, 8 of the 11 (73%) participants met confirmed virologic failure criteria at or before the Week 24 injection visit.
Four of the 9 confirmed virologic failure participants in the every-2-month arm transitioned from the oral current antiretroviral regimen arm of ATLAS into this trial.
In the every-2-month treatment arm, 8 of 9 (89%) confirmed virologic failure participants had NNRTI resistance-associated substitutions (E138E/K+V179V/I, K101E+E138A, A98G+K103N, E138K, V179I+Y188L+P225H, Y188L, K103N+E138A, or K101E) at virologic failure. Decreases in rilpivirine susceptibility for these 8 participant isolates ranged from 2- to 30-fold. Six of the 8 participants with NNRTI resistance-associated substitutions also had INSTI resistance-associated substitutions (L74I+Q148Q/R+N155N/H (n = 2), L74I+T97A+N155H, L74I+N155H, N155H, or L74I+Q148R) at failure with cabotegravir fold changes ranging from 1- to 9-fold. The INSTI polymorphism L74I was detected at baseline in 5 of the virologic failure participants by a HIV-1 proviral DNA assay.
In the monthly treatment arm, both of the confirmed virologic failure participants had NNRTI resistance-associated substitutions (K101E+M230L or Y188F+G190Q) at virologic failure with decreased susceptibility to rilpivirine of 17- and >119.2-fold, respectively. Both participants also had INSTI resistance-associated substitutions (N155N/H or Q148R+E138E/K) at failure with decreased susceptibility to cabotegravir of 2- and 5-fold, respectively. Neither participant had the L74I integrase polymorphism at baseline.
Genotypic Baseline Factors Associated With Virologic Failure
An increased risk of cabotegravir plus rilpivirine confirmed virologic failure is associated with baseline virological factors: HIV-1 subtype A1, the presence of baseline integrase L74I polymorphism, and archived NNRTI resistance-associated substitutions.
Association of Subtype A1 and Baseline L74I Polymorphism in Integrase with Cabotegravir plus Rilpivirine Virologic Failure
Eight of the 18 (44%) cabotegravir plus rilpivirine confirmed virologic failures in FLAIR, ATLAS, and ATLAS-2M had HIV-1 subtype A1 with 7 of the 8 subtype A1 failures having the integrase polymorphism L74I detected at baseline and failure timepoints (Table 7). There was no detectable phenotypic resistance to cabotegravir conferred by the presence of L74I at baseline.
Subtype A1 is uncommon in the U.S.
The presence of the integrase polymorphism L74I in subtype B commonly seen in the U.S. was not associated with virologic failure. In contrast to FLAIR and ATLAS, where all virologic failures were subtype A, A1, or AG, subtypes of the cabotegravir plus rilpivirine virologic failures in ATLAS-2M included A (n = 1), A1 (n = 3), B (n = 4), C (n = 2), and complex/A1 (n = 1).
Association Of Archived Baseline NNRTI Substitutions With Cabotegravir Plus Rilpivirine Virologic Failure
The presence of archived NNRTI resistance-associated substitutions at baseline detected using an exploratory HIV-1 proviral DNA assay was associated with a higher virologic failure rate in the every-2-month arm of ATLAS-2M and in the cabotegravir plus rilpivirine arm (monthly) of ATLAS compared to without archived NNRTI resistance-associated substitutions (Table 7). However, in clinical practice, it is unlikely baseline resistance testing will be performed on virologically suppressed patients (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL). Thus, in patients with an incomplete or uncertain NNRTI treatment history, consideration should be given before starting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine treatment.
Table 7: Rate of Confirmed Virologic Failure in FLAIR, ATLAS, and ATLAS-2M: Baselinea Analysis (Subtype Al, Presence of lntegrase Polymorphism L74I, and Presence of Archived NNRTI Resistance-Associated Substitutions)
|
FLAIR CAB+RPV
N = 283 |
FLAIR CAR
N = 283 |
ATLAS CAB+RPV
N = 308 |
ATLAS CAR
N = 308 |
ATLAS-2M Q4W
N = 523 |
ATLAS-2M Q8W
N = 522 |
| Total confirmed virologic failures |
5 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
9 |
| Subtype A1b |
4/8 (50%) |
1/4 (25%) |
1/17 (6%) |
0/21 (0%) |
0/30 (0%) |
4/31 (13%) |
| +L74Ic |
4/5 (80%) |
1/3 (33%) |
1/16 (6%) |
0/19 (0%) |
2/28 (0%) |
3/26 (12%) |
| -L74I |
0/3 (0%) |
0/1 (0%) |
0/1 (0%) |
0/2 (0%) |
0/2 (0%) |
1/5 (20%) |
| Other subtypes |
2/268(0.7%) |
3/272(1%) |
2/240(0.8%) |
4/252(1.6%) |
2/409(0.5%) |
5/415(1.2%) |
| +L74Ic |
0/49 (0%) |
1/43 (2.3%) |
1/29 (3%) |
1/39 (2.6%) |
0/42 (0%) |
2/48 (4%) |
| -L74I |
0/219(2.5%) |
2/229(0.9%) |
1/211(0.5%) |
3/213(1.4%) |
2/367(0.5%) |
3/367(0.8%) |
| Missing data |
7 |
7 |
51 |
35 |
84 |
76 |
| With NNRTI RASd |
NA |
NA |
3/78 (4%) |
2/83 (2%) |
1/128 (0.8%) |
7/117 (6%) |
| Without NNRTI RAS |
NA |
NA |
0/179 (0%) |
2/190 (1%) |
1/310 (0.3%) |
2/327 (0.6%) |
| Missing data |
NA |
NA |
51 |
35 |
84 |
76 |
NNRTI = Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor, CAB+RPV = Cabotegravir + Rilpivirine, CAR = Current Antiretroviral Regimen, RAS = resistance-associated substitutions, NA = Not available.
a Baseline and/or Screening result used.
b Per Standard Monogram Nomenclature Reports. Based on June 2020 Los Alamos National Library panel, the majority of HIV-1 subtype A1 was reclassified as HIV-1 subtype A6.
c L74I and L74L/I mixture.
d Baseline/Screening NNRTI substitutions at L100, K101, K103, V106, V108, E138, V179, Y181, Y188, G190, H221, P225, M230. |
HIV-1 PrEP
There were 12 incident infections and 4 prevalent infections among participants receiving cabotegravir injection for HIV-1 PrEP in HPTN 083. Genotypic data were generated for viruses from 13 of these 16 participants (4 participants with prevalent infections and 9 participants with incident infections) and phenotypic data were generated for 3 of these viruses. INSTI resistance-associated substitutions were detected in 5 viruses from participants who achieved target plasma concentrations of cabotegravir (≥0.65 mcg/mL [1.6 microM]) and included R263K (2-fold less susceptible to cabotegravir), E138A+Q148R (6-fold less susceptible to cabotegravir), E138K+Q148K, G140A+Q148R (13-fold less susceptible to cabotegravir), and L74I+E138E/K+G140G/S+Q148R+E157Q.
There were 3 incident infections and 1 prevalent infection among participants receiving cabotegravir injection for HIV-1 PrEP in HPTN 084. All 3 incident infections occurred during periods with cabotegravir exposures below the target concentration. No variants expressing INSTI resistance-associated substitutions were detected.
Cross-Resistance
Cross-resistance has been observed among INSTIs. Cabotegravir had reduced susceptibility (>5-fold change) to recombinant HIV-1 strain NL432 viruses harboring the following integrase amino acid substitutions: G118R, Q148K, Q148R, T66K+L74M, E92Q+N155H, E138A+Q148R, E138K+Q148K/R, G140C+Q148R, G140S+Q148H/K/R, Y143H+N155H, and Q148R+N155H (range: 5.1- to 81-fold). The substitutions E138K+Q148K and Q148R+N155H conferred the greatest reductions in susceptibility of 81- and 61-fold, respectively.
Cabotegravir was active against viruses harboring the NNRTI substitutions K103N or Y188L, or the NRTI substitutions M184V, D67N/K70R/T215Y, or V75I/F77L/F116Y/Q151M.
Virologic failure isolates from cabotegravir plus rilpivirine treatment in FLAIR, ATLAS, and ATLAS-2M exhibited cross-resistance to INSTIs and NNRTIs. All confirmed virologic isolates with genotypic evidence of cabotegravir resistance had cross-resistance to elvitegravir and raltegravir but retained phenotypic susceptibility to dolutegravir and when tested bictegravir.
Viruses harboring E138A+Q148R or G140A+Q148R with reduced susceptibility to cabotegravir were isolated from participants using cabotegravir injection for HIV-1 PrEP in HPTN 083. These viruses remained susceptible to bictegravir and dolutegravir but had cross-resistance to elvitegravir and raltegravir.
Clinical Studies
Clinical Trials In Adults For Treatment Of HIV-1 Infection
The use of VOCABRIA in combination with EDURANT as an oral lead-in and in patients who miss planned injections with CABENUVA was evaluated in 3 Phase 3 randomized, multicenter, active-controlled, parallel-arm, open-label, non-inferiority trials (Trial 201584: FLAIR [NCT02938520], Trial 201585: ATLAS [NCT02951052], and Trial 207966: ATLAS-2M [NCT03299049]) in participants who were virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL). Please refer to the CABENUVA prescribing information for additional information.
In the FLAIR study during the Extension Phase (Week 100 to Week 124), the efficacy of CABENUVA was evaluated in participants who switched (at Week 100) from their current antiretroviral regimen to CABENUVA, with and without an oral lead-in phase. A total of 121 participants chose to start the treatment with oral lead-in and 111 participants chose direct to injection. Participants were not randomized during the Extension Phase. At Week 124, the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL was 0.8% and 0.9% for the oral lead-in and direct to injection groups, respectively. The rates of virologic suppression (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL) were similar in both the oral lead-in (93%) and direct to injection (99%) groups.
Clinical Trials In Adults For HIV-1 Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis
The use of VOCABRIA as an oral lead-in and in participants who miss planned injections with APRETUDE to reduce the risk of acquiring HIV-1 infection were evaluated in 2 randomized, double-blind, controlled, multinational trials, Trial 201738 (HPTN 083 [NCT02720094]) in men and transgender women without HIV-1 who have sex with men and have evidence of high-risk behavior for HIV-1 infection and Trial 201739 (HPTN 084 [NCT03164564]) in cisgender women without HIV-1 at risk of acquiring HIV-1. Please refer to the APRETUDE prescribing information for additional information.
Clinical Trial In Adolescents For Treatment Of HIV-1 Infection
Trial 208580 (MOCHA, [NCT03497676])
The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of oral and injectable cabotegravir and oral and injectable rilpivirine were assessed in an ongoing Phase ½ multicenter, open-label, non-comparative study, MOCHA (IMPAACT 2017), in virologically suppressed adolescents with HIV-1 aged 12 to younger than 18 years and weighing ≥35 kg [see ADVERSE REACTIONS, CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY].
The primary objective at Week 24 was to confirm the safety of injectable cabotegravir plus injectable rilpivirine in virologically suppressed adolescents with HIV-1. Antiviral activity was assessed as a secondary objective. A total of 144 adolescent participants with HIV-1 received oral cabotegravir in combination with oral rilpivirine as an oral lead-in. Please refer to the CABENUVA prescribing information for additional information.