Clinical Pharmacology for Verzenio
Mechanism Of Action
Abemaciclib is an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4 and CDK6). These kinases are activated upon binding to D-cyclins. In estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer cell lines, cyclin D1 and CDK4/6 promote phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein (Rb), cell cycle progression, and cell proliferation. In vitro, continuous exposure to abemaciclib inhibited Rb phosphorylation and blocked progression from G1 into S phase of the cell cycle, resulting in senescence and apoptosis. In breast cancer xenograft models, abemaciclib dosed daily without interruption as a single agent or in combination with antiestrogens resulted in reduction of tumor size.
Pharmacodynamics
Cardiac Electrophysiology
Based on evaluation of the QTc interval in patients and in a healthy volunteer study, abemaciclib did not cause large mean increases (i.e., 20 ms) in the QTc interval.
Pharmacokinetics
The pharmacokinetics of abemaciclib were characterized in patients with solid tumors, including breast cancer, and in healthy subjects.
Following single and repeated twice daily dosing of 50 mg (0.3 times the approved recommended 150 mg dosage) to 200 mg of abemaciclib, the increase in plasma exposure (AUC) and Cmax was approximately dose proportional. Steady state was achieved within 5 days following repeated twice daily dosing, and the estimated geometric mean accumulation ratio was 2.3 (50% CV) and 3.2 (59% CV) based on Cmax and AUC, respectively.
Absorption
The absolute bioavailability of abemaciclib after a single oral dose of 200 mg is 45% (19% CV). The median Tmax of abemaciclib is 8.0 hours (range: 4.1-24.0 hours).
Effect of Food
A high-fat, high-calorie meal (approximately 800 to 1000 calories with 150 calories from protein, 250 calories from carbohydrate, and 500 to 600 calories from fat) administered to healthy subjects increased the AUC of abemaciclib plus its active metabolites by 9% and increased Cmax by 26%.
Distribution
In vitro, abemaciclib was bound to human plasma proteins, serum albumin, and alpha-1-acid glycoprotein in a concentration independent manner from 152 ng/mL to 5066 ng/mL. In a clinical study, the mean (standard deviation, SD) bound fraction was 96.3% (1.1) for abemaciclib, 93.4% (1.3) for M2, 96.8% (0.8) for M18, and 97.8% (0.6) for M20. The geometric mean systemic volume of distribution is approximately 690.3 L (49% CV).
In patients with advanced cancer, including breast cancer, concentrations of abemaciclib and its active metabolites M2 and M20 in cerebrospinal fluid are comparable to unbound plasma concentrations.
Elimination
The geometric mean hepatic clearance (CL) of abemaciclib in patients was 26.0 L/h (51% CV), and the mean plasma elimination half-life for abemaciclib in patients was 18.3 hours (72% CV).
Metabolism
Hepatic metabolism is the main route of clearance for abemaciclib. Abemaciclib is metabolized to several metabolites primarily by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, with formation of N-desethylabemaciclib (M2) representing the major metabolism pathway. Additional metabolites include hydroxyabemaciclib (M20), hydroxy-N-desethylabemaciclib (M18), and an oxidative metabolite (M1). M2, M18, and M20 are equipotent to abemaciclib and their AUCs accounted for 25%, 13%, and 26% of the total circulating analytes in plasma, respectively.
Excretion
After a single 150 mg oral dose of radiolabeled abemaciclib, approximately 81% of the dose was recovered in feces and approximately 3% recovered in urine. The majority of the dose eliminated in feces was metabolites.
Specific Populations
Age, Gender, And Body Weight
Based on a population pharmacokinetic analysis in patients with cancer, age (range 24-91 years), gender (134 males and 856 females), and body weight (range 36-175 kg) had no effect on the exposure of abemaciclib.
Patients With Renal Impairment
In a population pharmacokinetic analysis of 990 individuals, in which 381 individuals had mild renal impairment (60 mL/min ≤ CLcr <90 mL/min) and 126 individuals had moderate renal impairment (30 mL/min ≤ CLcr <60 mL/min), mild and moderate renal impairment had no effect on the exposure of abemaciclib [see Use In Specific Populations]. The effect of severe renal impairment (CLcr <30 mL/min) on pharmacokinetics of abemaciclib is unknown.
Patients With Hepatic Impairment
Following a single 200 mg oral dose of abemaciclib, the relative potency adjusted unbound AUC0-INF of abemaciclib plus its active metabolites (M2, M18, M20) in plasma increased 1.2-fold in subjects with mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh A, n=9), 1.1-fold in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh B, n=10), and 2.4-fold in subjects with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh C, n=6) relative to subjects with normal hepatic function (n=10) [see Use In Specific Populations]. In subjects with severe hepatic impairment, the mean plasma elimination half-life of abemaciclib increased to 55 hours compared to 24 hours in subjects with normal hepatic function.
Drug Interaction Studies
Effects Of Other Drugs On Abemaciclib
Strong CYP3A Inhibitors
Ketoconazole (a strong CYP3A inhibitor) is predicted to increase the AUC of abemaciclib by up to 16-fold.
Coadministration of 500 mg twice daily doses of clarithromycin (a strong CYP3A inhibitor) with a single 50 mg dose of VERZENIO (0.3 times the approved recommended 150 mg dosage) increased the relative potency adjusted unbound AUC0-INF of abemaciclib plus its active metabolites (M2, M18, and M20) by 2.5-fold relative to abemaciclib alone in cancer patients.
Moderate CYP3A Inhibitors
Verapamil and diltiazem (moderate CYP3A inhibitors) are predicted to increase the relative potency adjusted unbound AUC of abemaciclib plus its active metabolites (M2, M18, and M20) by approximately 1.6-fold and 2.4-fold, respectively.
Strong CYP3A Inducers
Coadministration of 600 mg daily doses of rifampin (a strong CYP3A inducer) with a single 200 mg dose of VERZENIO decreased the relative potency adjusted unbound AUC0-INF of abemaciclib plus its active metabolites (M2, M18, and M20) by approximately 70% in healthy subjects.
Moderate CYP3A Inducers
Efavirenz, bosentan, and modafinil (moderate CYP3A inducers) are predicted to decrease the relative potency adjusted unbound AUC of abemaciclib plus its active metabolites (M2, M18, and M20) by 53%, 41%, and 29%, respectively.
Loperamide
Co-administration of a single 8 mg dose of loperamide with a single 400 mg dose of abemaciclib in healthy subjects increased the relative potency adjusted unbound AUC0-INF of abemaciclib plus its active metabolites (M2 and M20) by 12%, which is not considered clinically relevant.
Endocrine Therapies
In clinical studies in patients with breast cancer, there was no clinically relevant effect of fulvestrant, anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane, or tamoxifen on abemaciclib pharmacokinetics.
Effects Of Abemaciclib On Other Drugs
Loperamide
In a clinical drug interaction study in healthy subjects, coadministration of a single 8 mg dose of loperamide with a single 400 mg abemaciclib (2.7 times the approved recommended 150 mg dosage) increased loperamide AUC0-INF by 9% and Cmax by 35% relative to loperamide alone. These increases in loperamide exposure are not considered clinically relevant.
Metformin
In a clinical drug interaction study in healthy subjects, coadministration of a single 1000 mg dose of metformin, a clinically relevant substrate of renal OCT2, MATE1, and MATE2-K transporters, with a single 400 mg dose of abemaciclib (2.7 times the approved recommended 150 mg dosage) increased metformin AUC0-INF by 37% and Cmax by 22% relative to metformin alone. Abemaciclib reduced the renal clearance and renal secretion of metformin by 45% and 62%, respectively, relative to metformin alone, without any effect on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) as measured by iohexol clearance and serum cystatin C.
Endocrine Therapies
In clinical studies in patients with breast cancer, there was no clinically relevant effect of abemaciclib on the pharmacokinetics of fulvestrant, anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane, or tamoxifen.
CYP Metabolic Pathways
In a clinical drug interaction study in patients with cancer, multiple doses of abemaciclib (200 mg twice daily for 7 days) did not result in clinically meaningful changes in the pharmacokinetics of CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 substrates. Abemaciclib is a substrate of CYP3A4, and time-dependent changes in pharmacokinetics of abemaciclib as a result of autoinhibition of its metabolism were not observed.
In Vitro Studies
Transporter Systems
Abemaciclib and its major active metabolites inhibit the renal transporters OCT2, MATE1, and MATE2-K at concentrations achievable at the approved recommended dosage. The observed serum creatinine increase in clinical studies with abemaciclib is likely due to inhibition of tubular secretion of creatinine via OCT2, MATE1, and MATE2-K [see Adverse Effects]. Abemaciclib and its major metabolites at clinically relevant concentrations do not inhibit the hepatic uptake transporters OCT1, OATP1B1, and OATP1B3 or the renal uptake transporters OAT1 and OAT3.
Abemaciclib is a substrate of P-gp and BCRP. Abemaciclib and its major active metabolites, M2 and M20, are not substrates of hepatic uptake transporters OCT1, organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1), or OATP1B3.
Abemaciclib inhibits P-gp and BCRP. The clinical consequences of this finding on sensitive P-gp and BCRP substrates are unknown.
P-gp and BCRP Inhibitors
In vitro, abemaciclib is a substrate of P-gp and BCRP. The effect of P-gp or BCRP inhibitors on the pharmacokinetics of abemaciclib has not been studied.
Animal Toxicology And/Or Pharmacology
In repeat-dose toxicity studies up to 6-months duration, oral administration of abemaciclib resulted in retinal atrophy of the eyes in mice at a dose of 150 mg/kg/day (approximately 10 times the exposure at the maximum recommended human dose based on AUC) and in rats at a dose of 30 mg/kg/day (approximately 5 times the exposure at the maximum recommended human dose based on AUC). In a 2-year rat carcinogenicity study, oral administration of abemaciclib resulted in retinal atrophy in the eyes at doses ≥0.3 mg/kg/day (approximately 0.05 times the exposure at the maximum recommended human dose based on AUC).
Clinical Studies
Early Breast Cancer
VERZENIO In Combination With Standard Endocrine Therapy (MonarchE)
Patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence monarchE (NCT03155997) was a randomized (1:1), open-label, two cohort, multicenter study in adult women and men with HR-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive, resected, early breast cancer with clinical and pathological features consistent with a high risk of disease recurrence. To be enrolled, patients had to have HR-positive HER2-negative early breast cancer with tumor involvement in at least 1 axillary lymph node (pALN) and to be enrolled in cohort 1 had to have either
- ≥4 pALN or
- 1-3 pALN and at least one of:
- tumor grade 3 or
- tumor size ≥50 mm
Patients enrolled in cohort 2 could not have met the eligibility criteria for cohort 1. To be enrolled in cohort 2, patients had to have 1-3 pALN and Ki-67 score ≥20%. Breast tumor samples were tested at central sites using the Ki-67 IHC MIB-1 pharmDx (Dako Omnis) assay to establish if the Ki-67 score was ≥20%.
Patients were randomized to receive 2 years of VERZENIO plus physician's choice of standard endocrine therapy or standard endocrine therapy alone. Randomization to treatment was stratified by prior treatment (neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus adjuvant chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy); menopausal status (premenopausal versus postmenopausal); and region (North America/Europe versus Asia versus other). Men were stratified as postmenopausal. After the end of the study treatment period, standard adjuvant endocrine therapy was continued for a duration of at least 5 years if deemed medically appropriate.
The major efficacy outcome measure was invasive disease–free survival (IDFS). IDFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of: ipsilateral invasive breast tumor recurrence, regional invasive breast cancer recurrence, distant recurrence, contralateral invasive breast cancer, second primary non-breast invasive cancer, or death attributable to any cause. Overall survival (OS) was an additional outcome measure.
A statistically significant difference in IDFS was observed in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population which was primarily attributed to the patients treated in cohort 1. While the OS data in cohort 2 remains immature, more deaths were observed among those receiving VERZENIO plus standard endocrine therapy compared to those receiving standard endocrine therapy alone (10/253 vs. 5/264).
Of 5637 patients randomized, 5120 (91%) were randomized in cohort 1. Patient median age was 51 years (range, 22-89 years), 99% were women, 70% were White, 24% were Asian, 1.7% were Black or African American, 2.1% were American Indian or Alaska Native, and 0.1% were Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. Forty-three percent of patients were premenopausal. Most patients received prior chemotherapy (37% neoadjuvant, 59% adjuvant) and prior radiotherapy (96%). Sixty-five percent of the patients had 4 or more positive lymph nodes with 22% having ≥10 positive lymph nodes, 41% had Grade 3 tumor, and 24% had pathological tumor size ≥50 mm. The majority of patients (99%) had estrogen receptor positive disease and 87% had progesterone receptor positive disease. Initial endocrine therapy received by patients included letrozole (39%), tamoxifen (31%), anastrozole (22%), or exemestane (8%).
Efficacy results for cohort 1 are summarized in Table 16 and Figure 1. At the time of OS interim analysis 2, OS was immature and a total of 315 (6%) of patients had died in cohort 1.
Table 16: Efficacy Results in monarchE in Cohort 1
|
VERZENIO Plus
Tamoxifen or an Aromatase
Inhibitor
N=2555 |
Tamoxifen or an Aromatase
Inhibitor
N=2565 |
| Invasive Disease–Free Survival (IDFS) |
| Number of patients with an event, n (%) |
317 (12) |
474 (18) |
| Hazard ratio (95% CI) |
0.65 (0.57, 0.75) |
| IDFS at 48 months, % (95% CI) |
85.5 (83.8, 87.0) |
78.6 (76.7, 80.4) |
| Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval |
Figure 1: Kaplan-Meier Curves of Invasive Disease–Free Survival VERZENIO plus Tamoxifen or an Aromatase Inhibitor versus Tamoxifen or an Aromatase Inhibitor in Cohort 1 (monarchE)
Advanced Or Metastatic Breast Cancer
VERZENIO In Combination With An Aromatase Inhibitor (Anastrozole Or Letrozole) (MONARCH 3)
Postmenopausal women with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer with no prior systemic therapy in this disease setting
MONARCH 3 (NCT02246621) was a randomized (2:1), double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter study in postmenopausal women with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer in combination with a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor as initial endocrine-based therapy, including patients not previously treated with systemic therapy for breast cancer.
Randomization was stratified by disease site (visceral, bone only, or other) and by prior (neo)adjuvant endocrine therapy (aromatase inhibitor versus other versus no prior endocrine therapy). A total of 493 patients were randomized to receive 150 mg VERZENIO or placebo orally twice daily, plus physician’s choice of letrozole (80% of patients) or anastrozole (20% of patients). Patient median age was 63 years (range, 32-88 years) and the majority were White (58%) or Asian (30%). A total of 51% had received prior systemic therapy and 39% of patients had received chemotherapy, 53% had visceral disease, and 22% had bone-only disease.
Efficacy results are summarized in Table 17 and Figure 2. PFS was evaluated according to RECIST version 1.1 and PFS assessment based on a blinded independent radiologic review was consistent with the investigator assessment. Consistent PFS results were observed across patient stratification subgroups of disease site and prior (neo)adjuvant endocrine therapy.
Table 17: Efficacy Results in MONARCH 3 (Investigator Assessment, Intent-to-Treat Population)
|
VERZENIO plus
Anastrozole or Letrozole |
Placebo plus
Anastrozole or Letrozole |
| Progression-Free Survival |
N=328 |
N=165 |
| Number of patients with an event, n (%) |
138 (42) |
108 (65) |
| Median in months (95% CI) |
28.2 (23.5, NR) |
14.8 (11.2, 19.2) |
| Hazard ratio (95% CI) |
0.54 (0.42, 0.70) |
| p-value |
<0.0001 |
| Overall Survival |
N=328 |
N=165 |
| Number of patients with an event, n (%) |
198 (60) |
116 (70) |
| Median in months (95% CI) |
66.8 (59.2, 74.8) |
53.7 (44.7 59.3) |
| Hazard ratio (95% CI) |
0.80 (0.64, 1.02) |
| p-value |
NS |
| Objective Response for Patients with Measurable Diseasea |
N=267 |
N=132 |
| Objective response rate, n (%)a,b |
148 (55) |
53 (40) |
| 95% CI |
49, 61 |
32, 49 |
Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; OS = overall survival; NR = not reached; NS = not statistically significant.
aComplete response + partial response.
b Based upon confirmed responses. |
Figure 2: Kaplan-Meier Curves of Progression-Free Survival: VERZENIO plus Anastrozole or Letrozole versus Placebo plus Anastrozole or Letrozole in Intent-to-Treat Population (MONARCH 3)
VERZENIO In Combination With Fulvestrant (MONARCH 2)
Patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer with disease progression on or after prior adjuvant or metastatic endocrine therapy
MONARCH 2 (NCT02107703) was a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study in women with HR-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in combination with fulvestrant in patients with disease progression following endocrine therapy who had not received chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. Randomization was stratified by disease site (visceral, bone only, or other) and by sensitivity to prior endocrine therapy (primary or secondary resistance). Primary endocrine therapy resistance was defined as relapse while on the first 2 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy or progressive disease within the first 6 months of first line endocrine therapy for metastatic breast cancer. A total of 669 patients were randomized to receive VERZENIO or placebo orally twice daily plus intramuscular injection of 500 mg fulvestrant on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1 and then on day 1 of cycle 2 and beyond (28-day cycles). Pre/perimenopausal women were enrolled in the study and received the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist goserelin for at least 4 weeks prior to and for the duration of MONARCH 2. Patients remained on continuous treatment until development of progressive disease or unmanageable toxicity.
Patient median age was 60 years (range, 32-91 years), and 37% of patients were older than 65. The majority were White (56%), and 99% of patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. Twenty percent (20%) of patients had de novo metastatic disease, 27% had bone-only disease, and 56% had visceral disease. Twenty-five percent (25%) of patients had primary endocrine therapy resistance. Seventeen percent (17%) of patients were pre-or perimenopausal.
The efficacy results from the MONARCH 2 study are summarized in Table 18, Figure 3, and Figure 4. PFS assessment based on a blinded independent radiologic review was consistent with the investigator assessment. Consistent results were observed across patient stratification subgroups of disease site and endocrine therapy resistance for PFS and OS.
Table 18: Efficacy Results in MONARCH 2 (Intent-to-Treat Population)
|
VERZENIO plus Fulvestrant |
Placebo plus Fulvestrant |
Progression-Free Survival
(Investigator Assessment) |
N=446 |
N=223 |
| Number of patients with an event, n (%) |
222 (50) |
157 (70) |
| Median in months (95% CI) |
16.4 (14.4, 19.3) |
9.3 (7.4, 12.7) |
| Hazard ratio (95% CI)a |
0.55 (0.45, 0.68) |
| p-valuea |
p<.0001 |
| Overall Survivalb |
| Number of deaths, n (%) |
211 (47) |
127 (57) |
| Median OS in months (95% CI) |
46.7 (39.2, 52.2) |
37.3 (34.4, 43.2) |
| Hazard ratio (95% CI)a |
0.76 (0.61, 0.95) |
| p-valuea |
p=.0137 |
| Objective Response for Patients with Measurable Disease |
N=318 |
N=164 |
| Objective response rate, n (%)c |
153 (48) |
35 (21) |
| 95% CI |
43, 54 |
15, 28 |
Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval, OS = overall survival.
a Stratified by disease site (visceral metastases vs. bone-only metastases vs. other) and endocrine therapy resistance (primary resistance vs. secondary resistance)
b Data from a pre-specified interim analysis (77% of the number of events needed for the planned final analysis) with the p-value compared with the allocated alpha of 0.021.
csup>Complete response + partial response. |
Figure 3: Kaplan-Meier Curves of Progression-Free Survival: VERZENIO plus Fulvestrant versus Placebo plus Fulvestrant (MONARCH 2)
Figure 4: Kaplan-Meier Curves of Overall Survival: VERZENIO plus Fulvestrant versus Placebo plus Fulvestrant (MONARCH 2)
VERZENIO Administered As A Monotherapy In Metastatic Breast Cancer (MONARCH 1)
Patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative Breast Cancer who Received Prior Endocrine Therapy and 1-2 Chemotherapy Regimens in the Metastatic Setting
MONARCH 1 (NCT02102490) was a single-arm, open-label, multicenter study in women with measurable HR-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer whose disease progressed during or after endocrine therapy, had received a taxane in any setting, and who received 1 or 2 prior chemotherapy regimens in the metastatic setting. A total of 132 patients received 200 mg VERZENIO orally twice daily on a continuous schedule until development of progressive disease or unmanageable toxicity.
Patient median age was 58 years (range, 36-89 years), and the majority of patients were White (85%). Patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 (55% of patients) or 1 (45%). The median duration of metastatic disease was 27.6 months. Ninety percent (90%) of patients had visceral metastases, and 51% of patients had 3 or more sites of metastatic disease. Fifty-one percent (51%) of patients had had one line of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. Sixty-nine percent (69%) of patients had received a taxane-based regimen in the metastatic setting and 55% had received capecitabine in the metastatic setting. Table 19 provides the efficacy results from MONARCH 1.
Table 19: Efficacy Results in MONARCH 1 (Intent-to-Treat Population)
|
VERZENIO 200 mg
N=132 |
| Investigator Assessed |
Independent Review |
| Objective Response Ratea,b, n (%) |
26 (20) |
23 (17) |
| 95% CI |
13, 28 |
11, 25 |
| Median Duration of Response in months |
8.6 |
7.2 |
| 95% CI |
5.8, 10.2 |
5.6, NR |