CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism Of Action
The EGFR is a transmembrane glycoprotein that is a member
of a subfamily of type I receptor tyrosine kinases, including EGFR, HER2, HER3,
and HER4. EGFR is constitutively expressed in normal epithelial tissues,
including the skin and hair follicle. EGFR is overexpressed in certain human
cancers, including colon and rectum cancers. Interaction of EGFR with its
normal ligands (eg, EGF, transforming growth factor-alpha) leads to
phosphorylation and activation of a series of intracellular proteins, which in turn
regulate transcription of genes involved with cellular growth and survival,
motility, and proliferation. Signal transduction through the EGFR results in
activation of the wild-type KRAS protein. However, in cells with activating KRAS
somatic mutations, the KRAS-mutant protein is continuously active and appears
independent of EGFR regulation.
Panitumumab binds specifically to EGFR on both normal and
tumor cells, and competitively inhibits the binding of ligands for EGFR.
Nonclinical studies show that binding of panitumumab to the EGFR prevents
ligand-induced receptor autophosphorylation and activation of
receptor-associated kinases, resulting in inhibition of cell growth, induction
of apoptosis, decreased proinflammatory cytokine and vascular growth factor
production, and internalization of the EGFR. In vitro assays and in vivo animal
studies demonstrate that panitumumab inhibits the growth and survival of
selected human tumor cell lines expressing EGFR.
Pharmacokinetics
Panitumumab administered as a single agent exhibits
nonlinear pharmacokinetics.
Following single-dose administrations of panitumumab as
1-hour infusions, the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) increased
in a greater than dose-proportional manner, and clearance (CL) of panitumumab
decreased from 30.6 to 4.6 mL/day/kg as the dose increased from 0.75 to 9
mg/kg. However, at doses above 2 mg/kg, the AUC of panitumumab increased in an
approximately dose-proportional manner.
Following the recommended dose regimen (6 mg/kg given
once every 2 weeks as a 1-hour infusion), panitumumab concentrations reached
steady-state levels by the third infusion with mean (± SD) peak and trough
concentrations of 213 ± 59 and 39 ± 14 mcg/mL, respectively. The mean (± SD)
AUC0-tau and CL were 1306 ± 374 mcg•day/mL and 4.9 ± 1.4 mL/kg/day,
respectively. The elimination half-life was approximately 7.5 days (range: 3.6
to 10.9 days).
A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed to
explore the potential effects of selected covariates on panitumumab
pharmacokinetics. Results suggest that age (21-88 years), gender, race (15%
nonwhite), mild-tomoderate renal dysfunction, mild-to-moderate hepatic
dysfunction, and EGFR membrane-staining intensity (1+, 2+, and 3+) in tumor
cells had no apparent impact on the pharmacokinetics of panitumumab.
No formal pharmacokinetic studies of panitumumab have
been conducted in patients with renal or hepatic impairment.
Animal Toxicology And/Or Pharmacology
Weekly administration of panitumumab to cynomolgus
monkeys for 4 to 26 weeks resulted in dermatologic findings, including
dermatitis, pustule formation and exfoliative rash, and deaths secondary to
bacterial infection and sepsis at doses of 1.25 to 5-fold higher (based on body
weight) than the recommended human dose.
Reproductive And Developmental Toxicology
Pregnant cynomolgus monkeys were treated weekly with
panitumumab during the period of organogenesis (gestation day [GD] 20-50).
While no panitumumab was detected in serum of neonates from panitumumab-treated
dams, anti-panitumumab antibody titers were present in 14 of 27 offspring delivered
at GD 100. There were no fetal malformations or other evidence of teratogenesis
noted in the offspring. However, significant increases in embryolethality and
abortions occurred at doses of approximately 1.25 to 5 times the recommended
human dose (based on body weight).
Clinical Studies
Recurrent Or Refractory mCRC
The safety and efficacy of Vectibix was demonstrated in
Study 1, an open-label, multinational, randomized, controlled trial of 463
patients with EGFR-expressing, metastatic carcinoma of the colon or rectum, and
in Study 2, an open-label, multicenter, multinational, randomized trial of 1010
patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC.
Study 1
Patients in Study 1 were required to have progressed on
or following treatment with a regimen(s) containing a fluoropyrimidine,
oxaliplatin, and irinotecan; progression was confirmed by an independent review
committee (IRC) masked to treatment assignment for 76% of the patients.
Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive panitumumab at a dose of 6 mg/kg
given once every 2 weeks plus BSC (N = 231) or BSC alone (N = 232) until
investigator-determined disease progression. Randomization was stratified based
on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) (0 and 1
vs 2) and geographic region (Western Europe, Eastern/Central Europe, or other).
Upon investigator-determined disease progression, patients in the BSC-alone arm
were eligible to receive panitumumab and were followed until disease
progression was confirmed by the IRC.
Based upon IRC determination of disease progression, a
statistically significant prolongation in PFS was observed in patients
receiving panitumumab compared to those receiving BSC alone. The mean PFS was
96 days in the panitumumab arm and 60 days in the BSC-alone arm.
The study results were analyzed in the wild-type KRAS subgroup
where KRAS status was retrospectively determined using archived
paraffin-embedded tumor tissue. KRAS mutation status was determined in 427
patients (92%); of these, 243 (57%) had no detectable KRAS mutations in either
codons 12 or 13. The hazard ratio for PFS in patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC
was 0.45 (95% CI: 0.34-0.59) favoring the panitumumab arm. The response rate
was 17% for the panitumumab arm and 0% for BSC. There were no differences in
OS; 77% of patients in the BSC arm received panitumumab at the time of disease
progression.
Study 2
Study 2 was an open-label, multicenter, multinational,
randomized (1:1) clinical trial, stratified by region (North America, Western
Europe, and Australia versus rest of the world) and ECOG PS (0 and 1 vs 2) in
patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC. A total of 1010 patients who received prior
treatment with irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and a thymidylate synthase inhibitor
were randomized to receive Vectibix 6 mg/kg intravenously over 60 minutes every
14 days or cetuximab 400 mg/m² intravenously over 120 minutes on day
1 followed by 250 mg/m² intravenously over 60 minutes every 7 days.
The trial excluded patients with clinically significant cardiac disease and
interstitial lung disease. The major efficacy analysis tested whether the OS of
Vectibix was noninferior to cetuximab. Data for investigator-assessed PFS and
objective response rate (ORR) were also collected. The criteria for
noninferiority was for Vectibix to retain at least 50% of the OS benefit of
cetuximab based on an OS hazard ratio of 0.55 from the NCIC CTG CO.17 study
relative to BSC.
In Study 2, 37% of patients were women, 52% were white,
45% were Asian, and 1.3% were Hispanic or Latino. Thirty-one percent of
patients were enrolled at sites in North America, Western Europe, or Australia.
ECOG performance was 0 in 32% of patients, 1 in 60% of patients, and 2 in 8% of
patients. Median age was 61 years. More patients (62%) had colon cancer than
rectal cancer (38%). Most patients (74%) had not received prior bevacizumab.
The key efficacy analysis for Study 2 demonstrated that
Vectibix was statistically significantly noninferior to cetuximab for OS.
The efficacy results for Study 2 are presented in Table 3
and Figure 1.
Table 3: Results in Previously Treated Wild-type KRAS mCRC
(Study 2)
Wild-type KRAS Population |
Vectibix
(n = 499)a |
Cetuximab
(n = 500)a |
OS |
Number of OS events (%) |
383 (76.8) |
392 (78.4) |
Median (months) (95% CI) |
10.4 (9.4, 11.6) |
10.0 (9.3, 11.0) |
Hazard ratio (95% CI) |
0.97 (0.84, 1.11) |
PFS |
Median (months) (95% CI) |
4.1 (3.2, 4.8) |
4.4 (3.2, 4.8) |
Hazard ratio (95% CI) |
1.00 (0.88, 1.14) |
ORR |
% (95% CI) |
22% (18%, 26%) |
19% (16%, 23%) |
aModified intent-to-treat population that
included all patients who received at least one dose of therapy |
Figure 1 : Kaplan - Meier Plot of Overall Survival in
Patients with Wild-type KRAS mCRC (Study 2)
First-line in Combination with
FOLFOX Chemotherapy
Study 3
Study 3 was a multicenter,
open-label trial that randomized (1:1) patients with mCRC who were previously
untreated in the metastatic setting and who had received no prior oxaliplatin
to receive Vectibix every 14 days in combination with FOLFOX or to FOLFOX alone
every 14 days. Vectibix was administered at 6 mg/kg over 60 minutes prior to
administration of chemotherapy. The FOLFOX regimen consisted of oxaliplatin 85
mg per m² IV infusion over 120 minutes and leucovorin (dl-racemic)
200 mg per m² intravenous infusion over 120 minutes at the same time
on day 1 using a Y-line, followed on day 1 by 5-FU 400 mg per m² intravenous
bolus. The 5FU bolus was followed by a continuous infusion of 5-FU 600 mg per m² over 22 hours. On day 2, patients received leucovorin 200 mg per m² followed
by the bolus dose (400 mg per m²) and continuous infusion of 5FU
(600 mg per m²) over 22 hours. Study 3 excluded patients with known
central nervous system metastases, clinically significant cardiac disease,
interstitial lung disease, or active inflammatory bowel disease. The prespecified
major efficacy measure was PFS in patients (n = 656) with wild-type KRAS mCRC
as assessed by a blinded independent central review of imaging. Other key
efficacy measures included OS and ORR.
In Study 3, in the wild-type KRAS
group, 64% of patients were men, 92% white, 2% black, and 4% Hispanic or
Latino. Sixty-six percent of patients had colon cancer and 34% had rectal
cancer. ECOG performance was 0 in 56% of patients, 1 in 38% of patients, and 2
in 6% of patients. Median age was 61.5 years.
The efficacy results in Study 3
in patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC are presented in Table 4 below.
Table 4: Results in Patients
with Wild-type KRAS mCRC and KRAS-Mutant mCRC (Study 3)
Wild-type KRAS population |
Primary Analysis |
Vectibix plus FOLFOX
(n = 325)a |
FOLFOX Alone
(n = 331)a |
PFS |
Median (months) (95% CI) |
9.6 (9.2, 11.1) |
8.0 (7.5, 9.3) |
Hazard ratio (95% CI)
p-value |
0.80 (0.66, 0.97)
p =0.02 |
ORR |
% (95% CI) |
54% (48%, 59%) |
47% (41%, 52%) |
aIntent-to-treat population |
KRAS-Mutant Subgroup
In Study 3, among patients with
KRAS-mutant tumors, median PFS was 7.3 months (95% CI: 6.3, 8.0) among 221
patients receiving Vectibix plus FOLFOX versus 8.8 months (95% CI: 7.7, 9.4)
among patients who received FOLFOX alone (HR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.62).
Median OS was 15.5 months (95% CI: 13.1, 17.6) among patients receiving Vectibix
plus FOLFOX versus 19.3 months (95% CI: 16.5, 21.8) among patients who received
FOLFOX alone (HR = 1.24, 95% CI: 0.98, 1.57).
Exploratory Analysis of OS
An exploratory analysis of OS
with updated information based on events in 82% of patients with wild-type KRAS
mCRC estimated the treatment effect of Vectibix plus FOLFOX compared with
FOLFOX alone on OS (Figure 2). Median OS among 325 patients with wild-type KRAS
mCRC who received Vectibix plus FOLFOX was 23.8 months  (95% CI: 20.0,
27.7) versus 19.4 months (95% CI: 17.4, 22.6) among 331 patients who received
FOLFOX alone (HR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70, 0.98).
Figure 2 : Kaplan - Meier Plot of Overall Survival in
Patients with Wild-type KRAS mCRC (Study 3)