Clinical Pharmacology for Trulicity
Mechanism Of Action
TRULICITY contains dulaglutide, which is a human GLP-1 receptor agonist with 90% amino acid sequence homology to endogenous human GLP-1 (7-37). Dulaglutide activates the GLP-1 receptor, a membrane-bound cell-surface receptor coupled to adenylyl cyclase in pancreatic beta cells. Dulaglutide increases intracellular cyclic AMP (cAMP) in beta cells leading to glucose-dependent insulin release. Dulaglutide also decreases glucagon secretion and slows gastric emptying.
Pharmacodynamics
TRULICITY lowers fasting glucose and reduces postprandial glucose (PPG) concentrations in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The reduction in fasting and postprandial glucose can be observed after a single dose.
Fasting And Postprandial Glucose
In a clinical pharmacology study in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, treatment with once weekly TRULICITY resulted in a reduction of fasting and 2-hour PPG concentrations, and postprandial serum glucose incremental AUC, when compared to placebo (-25.6 mg/dL, -59.5 mg/dL, and -197 mg*h/dL, respectively); these effects were sustained after 6 weeks of dosing with the 1.5 mg dose.
First- And Second-Phase Insulin Secretion
Both first- and second-phase insulin secretion were increased in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with TRULICITY compared with placebo.
Insulin And Glucagon Secretion
TRULICITY stimulates glucose-dependent insulin secretion and reduces glucagon secretion. Treatment with TRULICITY 0.75 mg and 1.5 mg once weekly increased fasting insulin from baseline at Week 26 by 35.38 and 17.50 pmol/L, respectively, and C-peptide concentration by 0.09 and 0.07 nmol/L, respectively, in a monotherapy trial. In the same trial, fasting glucagon concentration was reduced by 1.71 and 2.05 pmol/L from baseline with TRULICITY 0.75 mg and 1.5 mg, respectively.
Gastric Motility
Dulaglutide causes a delay of gastric emptying. The delay in gastric emptying is dose-dependent but is attenuated with adequate dose escalation to higher doses of TRULICITY. The delay is largest after the first dose and diminishes with subsequent doses.
Cardiac Electrophysiology (QTc)
The effect of dulaglutide on cardiac repolarization was tested in a thorough QTc study. Dulaglutide did not produce QTc prolongation at doses of 4 and 7 mg. The maximum recommended dose is 4.5 mg once weekly.
Pharmacokinetics
The pharmacokinetics of dulaglutide is similar between healthy subjects and patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Following subcutaneous administration, the time to maximum plasma concentration of dulaglutide at steady state ranges from 24 to 72 hours, with a median of 48 hours. After reaching steady state, the accumulation ratio was approximately 1.56. Steady-state plasma dulaglutide concentrations were achieved between 2 and 4 weeks following once weekly administration. Site of subcutaneous administration (abdomen, upper arm, and thigh) had no statistically significant effect on the exposure to dulaglutide.
Absorption
The mean absolute bioavailability of dulaglutide following subcutaneous administration of single 0.75 mg and 1.5 mg doses was 65% and 47%, respectively. Absolute subcutaneous bioavailability for 3 mg and 4.5 mg doses were estimated to be similar to 1.5 mg although this has not been specifically studied. Dulaglutide concentrations increased approximately proportional to dose from 0.75 mg to 4.5 mg.
Distribution
Apparent population mean central volume of distribution was 3.09 L and the apparent population mean peripheral volume of distribution was 5.98 L.
Elimination
The apparent population mean clearance of dulaglutide was 0.142 L/h. The elimination half-life of dulaglutide was approximately 5 days.
Metabolism
Dulaglutide is presumed to be degraded into its component amino acids by general protein catabolism pathways.
Specific Populations
The intrinsic factors of age (≥ 65 years), sex, race, ethnicity, body weight, or renal or hepatic impairment did not have a clinically relevant effect on the PK of dulaglutide as shown in Figure 1.
Note: Reference values for weight, age, gender, and race comparisons are 93 kg, 56 years old, male, and white, respectively; reference groups for renal and hepatic impairment data are subjects with normal renal and hepatic function from the respective clinical pharmacology studies. The weight values shown in the plot (70 and 120 kg) are the 10th and 90th percentiles of weight in the PK population.
Figure 1: Impact of intrinsic factors on dulaglutide pharmacokinetics.
 |
Abbreviations: AUC = area under the time-concentration curve; CI = confidence interval; Cmax = maximum concentration; ESRD = end-stage renal disease; PK = pharmacokinetics.
Note: Reference values for weight, age, gender, and race comparisons are 93 kg, 56 years old, male, and white, respectively; reference groups for renal and hepatic impairment data are subjects with normal renal and hepatic function from the respective clinical pharmacology studies. The weight values shown in the plot (70 and 120 kg) are the 10th and 90th percentiles of weight in the PK population. |
Pediatric Patients
A population pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted for dulaglutide 0.75 mg and 1.5 mg using data from 128 pediatric patients 10 years of age and older with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The AUC in pediatric patients was approximately 37% lower than that in adult patients. However, this difference was not determined to be clinically meaningful.
Patients With Renal Impairment
Dulaglutide systemic exposure was increased by 20, 28, 14 and 12% for mild, moderate, severe, and ESRD renal impairment sub-groups, respectively, compared to subjects with normal renal function. The corresponding values for increase in Cmax were 13, 23, 20 and 11%, respectively (Figure 1). Additionally, in a 52 week clinical trial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and moderate to severe renal impairment, the PK behavior of TRULICITY 0.75 mg and 1.5 mg once weekly was similar to that demonstrated in previous clinical studies [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS, Use In Specific Populations].
Patients With Hepatic Impairment
Dulaglutide systemic exposure decreased by 23, 33 and 21% for mild, moderate and severe hepatic impairment groups, respectively, compared to subjects with normal hepatic function, and Cmax was decreased by a similar magnitude (Figure 1) [see Use In Specific Populations].
Drug Interaction Studies
The potential effect of co-administered medications on the PK of dulaglutide 1.5 mg and vice versa was studied in several single- and multiple-dose studies in healthy subjects, patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and patients with hypertension.
Potential For Dulaglutide To Influence The Pharmacokinetics Of Other Drugs
Dulaglutide slows gastric emptying and, as a result, may reduce the extent and rate of absorption of orally coadministered medications. In clinical pharmacology studies, dulaglutide at a dose of 1.5 mg did not affect the absorption of the tested orally administered medications to any clinically relevant degree. The delay in gastric emptying is dosedependent but is attenuated with the recommended dose escalation to higher doses of TRULICITY [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION and DRUG INTERACTIONS]. The delay is largest after the first dose and diminishes with subsequent doses. PK measures indicating the magnitude of these interactions are presented in Figure 2.
Abbreviations: AUC = area under the time-concentration curve; CI = confidence interval; Cmax = maximum concentration; PK = pharmacokinetics.
Note: Reference group is co-administered medication given alone.
Figure 2: Impact of dulaglutide 1.5 mg on the pharmacokinetics of co-administered medications.
 |
Abbreviations: AUC = area under the time-concentration curve; CI = confidence interval; Cmax = maximum concentration; PK = pharmacokinetics.
Note: Reference group is co-administered medication given alone. |
Potential for Co-administered Drugs to Influence the Pharmacokinetics of Dulaglutide
In a clinical pharmacology study, the co-administration of a single dose of 1.5 mg dulaglutide with steady-state dose of 100 mg sitagliptin caused an increase in dulaglutide AUC and Cmax of approximately 38% and 27%, which is not considered clinically relevant.
Immunogenicity
The observed incidence of anti-drug antibodies is highly dependent on the sensitivity and specificity of the assay. Differences in assay methods preclude meaningful comparisons of the incidence of anti-drug antibodies in the studies described below with the incidence of anti-drug antibodies in other studies.
In glycemic control trials in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (monotherapy and combination therapy) [see Clinical Studies], during a treatment period ranging from 24 to 104 weeks, 64/3,907 (1.6%) of TRULICITY-treated patients developed anti-dulaglutide antibodies (referred to as anti-drug-antibodies (ADA)). Of the 64 TRULICITY-treated patients that developed ADA, 34 patients (0.9% of the overall population) developed dulaglutide-neutralizing antibodies, and 36 patients (0.9% of the overall population) developed antibodies against native GLP-1. There was no identified clinically significant effect of ADA on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, or effectiveness of TRULICITY over the 24 to 104 week treatment duration in the trials in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
During the 26-week controlled period of the glycemic control trial in pediatric patients 10 years of age or older with type 2 diabetes mellitus [see Clinical Studies], 4/101 (4%) of TRULICITY-treated pediatric patients developed ADA. Of the 4 pediatric patients that developed ADA, 1 patient (1% of the overall population) developed dulaglutide-neutralizing antibodies and 3 patients (3% of the overall population) developed antibodies against native GLP-1. During the 52-week postbaseline period of the same trial (through safety follow-up), 6/103 (6%) of TRULICITY-treated patients developed ADA. Of the 6 patients that developed ADA, 1 patient (1% of the overall population) developed dulaglutide-neutralizing antibodies and 4 patients (4% of the overall population) developed antibodies against native GLP-1. Because of the low occurrence of ADA, the effect of these antibodies on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and/or effectiveness of TRULICITY is unknown in pediatric patients.
Animal Toxicology And/Or Pharmacology
Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF) rats were given 0.5, 1.5, or 5 mg/kg/twice weekly of dulaglutide (1-, 3-, and 13-fold the MRHD based on AUC) for 3 months. Increases of 12% to 33% in total and pancreatic amylase, but not lipase, were observed at all doses without microscopic pancreatic inflammatory correlates in individual animals. Other changes in the dulaglutide-treated animals included increased interlobular ductal epithelium without active ductal cell proliferation (≥0.5 mg/kg), increased acinar atrophy with/without inflammation (≥1.5 mg/kg), and increased neutrophilic inflammation of the acinar pancreas (5 mg/kg).
Treatment of monkeys for 12 months with 8.15 mg/kg/twice weekly of dulaglutide (nearly 200-fold the MRHD based on AUC) demonstrated no evidence of pancreatic inflammation or pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. In 4 of 19 monkeys on dulaglutide treatment, there was an increase in goblet cells within the pancreatic ducts, but no differences from the control group in total amylase or lipase at study termination. There were no proliferative changes in the thyroid C-cells.
Clinical Studies
Overview Of Clinical Trials
TRULICITY has been studied in adults as monotherapy and in combination with metformin, sulfonylurea, metformin and sulfonylurea, metformin and thiazolidinedione, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) with or without metformin, basal insulin with or without metformin, and prandial insulin with or without metformin. TRULICITY has also been studied in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and moderate to severe renal impairment.
Dose escalation was performed in one trial in adults with TRULICITY doses up to 4.5 mg added to metformin. All other clinical studies in adults evaluated TRULICITY 0.75 mg and 1.5 mg without dose escalation; patients were initiated and maintained on either 0.75 mg or 1.5 mg for the duration of the trials [see Glycemic Control Monotherapy Trials In Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Glycemic Control Combination Therapy Trials In Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Glycemic Control Trials In Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus And Moderate To Severe Chronic Kidney Disease].
TRULICITY 0.75 mg and 1.5 mg was studied in pediatric patients 10 years of age and older with type 2 diabetes in combination with or without metformin and/or basal insulin treatment [see Glycemic Control Trial In Pediatric Patients 10 Years Of Age And Older With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus].
In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, TRULICITY produced reductions from baseline in HbA1c compared to placebo. No overall differences in glycemic effectiveness were observed across demographic subgroups (age, gender, race/ethnicity, duration of diabetes).
A cardiovascular outcomes trial was conducted in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and established cardiovascular (CV) disease or multiple cardiovascular risk factors. Patients were randomized to TRULICITY 1.5 mg or placebo both added to standard of care. TRULICITY significantly reduced the risk of first occurrence of primary composite endpoint of CV death, non-fatal MI, or non-fatal stroke [see Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial In Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus And Cardiovascular Disease Or Multiple Cardiovascular Risk Factors].
Glycemic Control Monotherapy Trials In Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
In a double-blind trial with primary endpoint at 26 weeks, 807 adult patients inadequately treated with diet and exercise, or with diet and exercise and one antidiabetic agent used at submaximal dose, were randomized to TRULICITY 0.75 mg once weekly, TRULICITY 1.5 mg once weekly, or metformin 1500 to 2000 mg/day following a two-week washout. Seventy-five percent (75%) of the randomized population were treated with one antidiabetic agent at the screening visit. Most patients previously treated with an antidiabetic agent were receiving metformin (~90%) at a median dose of 1000 mg daily and approximately 10% were receiving a sulfonylurea.
Patients had a mean age of 56 years and a mean duration of type 2 diabetes of 3 years. Forty-four percent were male. The White, Black and Asian race accounted for 74%, 7% and 8% of the population, respectively. Twenty-nine percent of the trial population were from the US.
Treatment with TRULICITY 0.75 mg and 1.5 mg once weekly resulted in reduction in HbA1c from baseline at 26- weeks (Table 4). The difference in observed effect size between TRULICITY 0.75 mg and 1.5 mg, respectively, and metformin excluded the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 0.4%.
Table 4: Results at Week 26 in a Trial of TRULICITY as Monotherapy in Adult Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitusa
|
26-Week Primary Time Point |
TRULICITY
0.75 mg |
TRULICITY
1.5 mg |
Metformin
1500-2000 mg |
| Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population (N)‡ |
270 |
269 |
268 |
| HbA1c (%) (Mean) |
Baseline
Change from baselineb |
7.6
-0.7 |
7.6
-0.8 |
7.6
-0.6 |
| Fasting Serum Glucose (mg/dL) (Mean) |
Baseline
Change from baselineb |
161
-26 |
164
-29 |
161
-24 |
| Body Weight (kg) (Mean) |
Baseline
Change from baselineb |
91.8
-1.4 |
92.7
-2.3 |
92.4
-2.2 |
Abbreviation: HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c.
aIntent-to-treat population. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used to impute missing data. Data post-onset of rescue therapy are treated as missing. At Week 26, primary efficacy was missing for 10%, 12% and 14% of individuals randomized to TRULICITY 0.75 mg, TRULICITY 1.5 mg and metformin, respectively.
b Least-squares mean adjusted for baseline value and other stratification factors.
‡ Patients included in the analysis are a subset of the ITT population that had at least one post-baseline assessment. The primary analysis included 265 individuals in each of the treatment arms. |
Glycemic Control Combination Therapy Trials In Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Sitagliptin-Controlled Trial (Add-On To Metformin)
In this placebo-controlled, double-blind trial with primary endpoint at 52 weeks, 972 adult patients were randomized to placebo, TRULICITY 0.75 mg once weekly, TRULICITY 1.5 mg once weekly, or sitagliptin 100 mg/day (after 26 weeks, patients in the placebo treatment group received blinded sitagliptin 100 mg/day for the remainder of the trial), all as addon to metformin. Randomization occurred after an 11-week lead-in period to allow for a metformin titration period, followed by a 6-week glycemic stabilization period. Patients had a mean age of 54 years; mean duration of type 2 diabetes of 7 years; 48% were male; race: White, Black and Asian were 53%, 4% and 27%, respectively; and 24% of the trial population were in the US.
At the 26-week placebo-controlled time point, the HbA1c change was 0.1%, -1.0%, -1.2%, and -0.6% for placebo, TRULICITY 0.75 mg, TRULICITY 1.5 mg, and sitagliptin, respectively. The percentage of patients who achieved HbA1c <7.0% was 22%, 56%, 62% and 39% for placebo, TRULICITY 0.75 mg, TRULICITY 1.5 mg, and sitagliptin, respectively. At 26 weeks, there was a mean weight reduction of 1.4 kg, 2.7 kg, 3.0 kg, and 1.4 kg for placebo, TRULICITY 0.75 mg, TRULICITY 1.5 mg, and sitagliptin, respectively. There was a mean reduction of fasting glucose of 9 mg/dL, 35 mg/dL, 41 mg/dL, and 18 mg/dL for placebo, TRULICITY 0.75 mg, TRULICITY 1.5 mg, and sitagliptin, respectively.
Treatment with TRULICITY 0.75 mg and 1.5 mg once weekly resulted in a statistically significant reduction in HbA1c compared to placebo (at 26 weeks) and compared to sitagliptin (at 26 and 52 weeks), all in combination with metformin (Table 5 and Figure 3).
Table 5: Results at Week 52 of TRULICITY Compared to Sitagliptin used as Add-On to Metformin in Adult Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitusa
|
52-Week Primary Time Point |
TRULICITY
0.75 mg |
TRULICITY
1.5 mg |
Sitagliptin
100 mg |
| Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population (N)‡ |
281 |
279 |
273 |
| HbA1c (%) (Mean) |
| Baseline |
8.2 |
8.1 |
8.0 |
| Change from baselineb |
-0.9 |
-1.1 |
-0.4 |
| Difference from sitagliptinb(95% CI) |
-0.5
(-0.7, -0.3)†† |
-0.7
(-0.9, -0.5)†† |
- |
| Percentage of patients HbA1c <7.0% |
49## |
59## |
33 |
| Fasting Plasma Glucose (mg/dL) (Mean) |
| Baseline |
174 |
173 |
171 |
| Change from baselineb |
-30 |
-41 |
-14 |
| Difference from sitagliptinb (95% CI) |
-15
(-22, -9) |
-27
(-33, -20) |
- |
| Body Weight (kg) (Mean) |
| Baseline |
85.5 |
86.5 |
85.8 |
| Change from baselineb |
-2.7 |
-3.1 |
-1.5 |
| Difference from sitagliptinb (95% CI) |
-1.2
(-1.8, -0.6) |
-1.5
(-2.1, -0.9) |
- |
Abbreviations: HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c.
aAll ITT patients randomized after the dose-finding portion of the trial. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used to impute missing data. At Week 52 primary efficacy was missing for 15%, 19%, and 20% of individuals randomized to TRULICITY 0.75 mg, TRULICITY 1.5 mg and sitagliptin, respectively.
bLeast-squares (LS) mean adjusted for baseline value and other stratification factors.
‡ Patients included in the analysis are a subset of the ITT population that had at least one post-baseline assessment. The primary analysis included 276, 277, and 270 individuals randomized to TRULICITY 0.75 mg, TRULICITY 1.5 mg and sitagliptin, respectively.
†† Multiplicity adjusted 1-sided p-value <0.001, for superiority of TRULICITY compared to sitagliptin, assessed only for HbA1c.
## p<0.001 TRULICITY compared to sitagliptin, assessed only for HbA1c <7.0%. |
Figure 3: Adjusted Mean HbA1c at each Time Point (ITT, MMRM) and at Week 52 (ITT, LOCF) in Adult Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
 |
| Mean HbA1c adjusted for baseline HbA1c and country. |
Dosage Ranging Trial Of TRULICITY 1.5, 3 mg, And 4.5 mg (Add-On To Metformin)
In this parallel-arm, double-blind trial with primary endpoint at 36 weeks, a total of 1842 adult patients were randomized 1:1:1 to TRULICITY 1.5 mg, TRULICITY 3 mg, or TRULICITY 4.5 mg once weekly, all as add-on to metformin (NCT03495102).
Following randomization, all patients received TRULICITY 0.75 mg once weekly. The dose was increased every 4 weeks to the next higher dose until the patients reached their assigned dose (1.5 mg, 3 mg, or 4.5 mg). Patients were to remain on the assigned study dose for the duration of the trial.
Patients had a mean age of 57.1 years; a mean duration of type 2 diabetes of 7.6 years; 51.2% were male; race: White, Black, and Asian were 85.8%, 4.5%, and 2.4%, respectively; and 27.6% of the trial population was in the US.
At 36 weeks, treatment with TRULICITY 4.5 mg resulted in a statistically significant reduction in HbA1c and in body weight compared to TRULICITY 1.5 mg (Table 6 and Figure 4).
Table 6. Results at Week 36 of TRULICITY 1.5 mg Compared to 3 mg and 4.5 mg as Add-On to Metformin in Adult Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitusa
|
36-Week Primary Time Point |
TRULICITY
1.5 mg |
TRULICITY
3 mg |
TRULICITY
4.5 mg |
| Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population (N) |
612 |
616 |
614 |
| HbA1c (%) (Mean) |
Baseline
Change from baselineb
Difference from 1.5 mgb (95% CI) |
8.6
-1.5 |
8.6
-1.6
-0.1
(-0.2, 0.0) |
8.6
-1.8
-0.2
(-0.4, -0.1) ∧ |
| Percentage of patients HbA1c <7.0%c |
50 |
56 |
62 |
| Fasting Serum Glucose (mg/dL) (Mean) |
Baseline
Change from baselineb
Difference from 1.5 mgb (95% CI) |
185
-45 |
184
-46
- 2 (-7, 3) |
183
-51
-6 (-11, -2) |
| Body Weight (kg) (Mean) |
Baseline
Change from baselineb
Difference from 1.5 mgb(95% CI) |
95.5
-3.0 |
96.3
-3.8
-0.9
(-1.4, -0.4) |
95.4
-4.6
-1.6
(-2.2, -1.1) ∧∧ |
Abbreviations: HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c
a Intent-to-treat population. At Week 36, primary efficacy was missing for 7%, 7%, and 6% of individuals treated with TRULICITY 1.5 mg, TRULICITY
3 mg, and TRULICITY 4.5 mg, respectively.
b Least-squares mean adjusted for baseline value and other stratification factors. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation.
c Patients with missing HbA1c data at Week 36 were considered as not achieving HbA1c target.
∧ p=0.0001 for superiority compared to TRULICITY 1.5 mg, overall type I error controlled.
∧∧ p<0.0001 for superiority compared to TRULICITY 1.5 mg, overall type I error controlled. |
Figure 4: Mean HbA1c at each Time Point (ITT) and at Week 36 (ITT, MI)
 |
| Observed mean HbA1c at scheduled visits and retrieved dropout multiple imputation (MI) based estimate at week 36. |
Placebo-Controlled Trial (Add-On To Sulfonylurea)
In this 24-week placebo-controlled, double-blind trial, 299 adult patients were randomized to and received placebo or once weekly TRULICITY 1.5 mg, both as add-on to glimepiride. Patients had a mean age of 58 years; mean duration of type 2 diabetes of 8 years; 44% were male; race: White, Black, and Asian were 83%, 4%, and 2%, respectively; and 24% of the trial population were in the US.
At 24 weeks, treatment with once weekly TRULICITY 1.5 mg resulted in a statistically significant reduction in HbA1c compared to placebo (Table 7).
Table 7: Results at Week 24 of TRULICITY Compared to Placebo as Add-On to Glimepiride in Adult Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitusa
|
24-Week Primary Time Point |
| Placebo |
TRULICITY
1.5 mg |
| Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population (N) |
60 |
239 |
| HbA1c (%) (Mean) |
| Baseline |
8.4 |
8.4 |
| Change from baselineb |
-0.3 |
-1.3 |
| Difference from placebob (95% CI) |
|
-1.1
(-1.4, -0.7)†† |
| Percentage of patients HbA1c <7.0%c |
17 |
50†† |
| Fasting Serum Glucose (mg/dL) (Mean) |
| Baseline |
175 |
178 |
| Change from baseline,b |
2 |
-28 |
| Difference from placebob (95% CI) |
|
-30 (-44, -15)†† |
| Body Weight (kg) (Mean) |
| Baseline |
89.5 |
84.5 |
| Change from baselineb |
-0.2 |
-0.5 |
| Difference from placebob (95% CI) |
|
-0.4 (-1.2, 0.5) |
Abbreviations: HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c.
a Intent-to-treat population. Data post-onset of rescue therapy are treated as missing. At Week 24 primary efficacy was missing for 10% and 12% of individuals randomized to TRULICITY 1.5 mg and placebo, respectively.
b Least-squares mean from ANCOVA adjusted for baseline value and other stratification factors. Placebo multiple imputation, with respect to the baseline values, was used to model a wash-out of the treatment effect for patients having missing Week 24 data.
c Patients with missing HbA1c data at Week 24 were considered as non-responders.
†† p<0.001 for superiority of TRULICITY 1.5 mg compared to placebo, overall type I error controlled. |
Placebo- And Exenatide-Controlled Trial (Add-On To Metformin And Thiazolidinedione)
In this placebo-controlled trial with primary endpoint at 26 weeks, 976 adult patients were randomized to and received placebo, TRULICITY 0.75 mg once weekly, TRULICITY 1.5 mg once weekly, or exenatide 10 mcg BID, all as add-on to maximally tolerated doses of metformin (≥1500 mg per day) and pioglitazone (up to 45 mg per day). Exenatide treatment group assignment was open-label while the treatment assignments to placebo, TRULICITY 0.75 mg, and TRULICITY 1.5 mg were blinded. After 26 weeks, patients in the placebo treatment group were randomized to either TRULICITY 0.75 mg once weekly or TRULICITY 1.5 mg once weekly to maintain blinding. Randomization occurred after a 12-week lead-in period; during the initial 4 weeks of the lead-in period, patients were titrated to maximally tolerated doses of metformin and pioglitazone; this was followed by an 8-week glycemic stabilization period prior to randomization. Patients randomized to exenatide started at a dose of 5 mcg BID for 4 weeks and then were escalated to 10 mcg BID. Patients had a mean age of 56 years; mean duration of type 2 diabetes of 9 years; 58% were male; race: White, Black and Asian were 74%, 8% and 3%, respectively; and 81% of the trial population were in the US.
Treatment with TRULICITY 0.75 mg and 1.5 mg once weekly resulted in a statistically significant reduction in HbA1c compared to placebo (at 26 weeks) and compared to exenatide at 26 weeks (Table 8 and Figure 5). Over the 52-week trial period, the percentage of patients who required glycemic rescue was 8.9% in the TRULICITY 0.75 mg once weekly + metformin and pioglitazone treatment group, 3.2% in the TRULICITY 1.5 mg once weekly + metformin and pioglitazone treatment group, and 8.7% in the exenatide BID + metformin and pioglitazone treatment group.
Table 8: Results at Week 26 of TRULICITY Compared to Placebo and Exenatide, All as Add-On to Metformin and Thiazolidinedione in Adult Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitusa
|
26-Week Primary Time Point |
| Placebo |
TRULICITY
0.75 mg |
TRULICITY
1.5 mg |
Exenatide
10 mcg BID |
| Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population (N)‡ |
141 |
280 |
279 |
276 |
| HbA1c (%) (Mean) |
| Baseline |
8.1 |
8.1 |
8.1 |
8.1 |
| Change from baselineb |
-0.5 |
-1.3 |
-1.5 |
-1.0 |
| Difference from placebob (95% CI) |
- |
-0.8
(-1.0, -0.7)‡‡ |
-1.1
(-1.2, -0.9)‡‡ |
- |
| Difference from exenatideb (95% CI) |
- |
-0.3
(-0.4, -0.2)†† |
-0.5
(-0.7, -0.4)†† |
- |
| Percentage of patients HbA1c <7.0% |
43 |
66**,## |
78**,## |
52 |
| Fasting Serum Glucose (mg/dL) (Mean) |
| Baseline |
166 |
159 |
162 |
164 |
| Change from baselineb |
-5 |
-34 |
-42 |
-24 |
| Difference from placebob (95% CI) |
- |
-30
(-36, -23) |
-38
(-45, -31) |
- |
| Difference from exenatideb (95% CI) |
- |
-10 (-15, -5) |
-18 (-24, -13) |
- |
| Body Weight (kg) (Mean) |
| Baseline |
94.1 |
95.5 |
96.2 |
97.4 |
| Change from baselineb |
1.2 |
0.2 |
-1.3 |
-1.1 |
| Difference from placebob (95% CI) |
- |
-1.0
(-1.8, -0.3) |
-2.5
(-3.3, -1.8) |
- |
| Difference from exenatideb (95% CI) |
- |
1.3
(0.6, 1.9) |
-0.2
(-0.9, 0.4) |
- |
Abbreviations: BID = twice daily; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c.
a Intent-to-treat population. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used to impute missing data. Data post-onset of rescue therapy are treated as missing. At Week 26, primary efficacy was missing for 23%, 10%, 7% and 12% of individuals randomized to placebo, TRULICITY 0.75 mg, TRULICITY 1.5 mg, and exenatide, respectively.
b Least-squares (LS) mean adjusted for baseline value and other stratification factors.
‡ Patients included in the analysis are a subset of the ITT population that had at least one post-baseline assessment. The primary analysis included 119, 269, 271 and 266 individuals randomized to placebo, TRULICITY 0.75 mg, TRULICITY 1.5 mg, and exenatide, respectively.
‡‡ Multiplicity adjusted 1-sided p-value <0.001, for superiority of TRULICITY compared to placebo, assessed only for HbA1c.
†† Multiplicity adjusted 1-sided p-value <0.001, for superiority of TRULICITY compared to exenatide, assessed only for HbA1c.
** p<0.001 TRULICITY compared to placebo, assessed only for HbA1c <7.0%.
## p<0.001 TRULICITY compared to exenatide, assessed only for HbA1c <7.0%. |
Figure 5: Adjusted Mean HbA1c at Each Time Point (ITT, MMRM) and at Week 26 (ITT, LOCF)
 |
| Mean HbA1c adjusted for baseline HbA1c and country. |
Placebo-Controlled Trial (Add-On To SGLT2i, With Or Without Metformin)
In this 24-week placebo-controlled, double-blind trial, 423 adult patients were randomized to and received TRULICITY 0.75 mg, TRULICITY 1.5 mg, or placebo, as add-on to sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) therapy (96% with and 4% without metformin). Trulicity was administered once weekly, and SGLT2i was administered according to the local country label. Patients had a mean age of 57 years; mean duration of type 2 diabetes of 9.4 years; 50% were male; race: White, Black, and Asian were 89%, 3%, and 0.2%, respectively; and 21% of the trial population was in the US.
At 24 weeks, treatment with once weekly TRULICITY 0.75 mg and 1.5 mg resulted in a statistically significant reduction from baseline in HbA1c compared to placebo (Table 9).
The mean baseline body weight was 90.5, 91.1, and 92.9 kg in the placebo, TRULICITY 0.75 mg, and TRULICITY 1.5 mg groups, respectively. The mean changes from baseline in body weight at Week 24 were -2.0, -2.5, and -2.9 kg for placebo, TRULICITY 0.75 mg, and TRULICITY 1.5 mg, respectively. The difference from placebo (95% CI) was -0.9 kg (-1.7, -0.1) for TRULICITY 1.5 mg.
Table 9: Results at Week 24 of TRULICITY as Add-on to SGLT2i in Adult Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitusa
|
24-Week Primary Time Point |
| Placebo |
TRULICITY
0.75 mg |
TRULICITY
1.5 mg |
| Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population (N) |
140 |
141 |
142 |
| HbA1c (%) (Mean) |
| Baseline |
8.1 |
8.1 |
8.0 |
| Change from baselineb |
-0.6 |
-1.2 |
-1.3 |
| Difference from placebob(95% CI) |
- |
-0.7
(-0.8, -0.5)†† |
-0.8
(-0.9, -0.6)†† |
| Percentage of patients HbA1c <7.0%c |
31 |
59†† |
67†† |
| Fasting Serum Glucose (mg/dL) (Mean) |
| Baseline |
153 |
162 |
161 |
| Change from baselineb |
-6 |
-25 |
-30 |
| Difference from placebob (95% CI) |
- |
-19
(-25, -13) |
-24
(-30, -18)†† |
Abbreviations: HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c; SGLT2i = sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors.
a Intent-to-treat population. At Week 24, primary efficacy was missing for 3%, 4%, and 6% of individuals treated with placebo, TRULICITY 0.75 mg, and TRULICITY 1.5 mg, respectively.
b Least-squares mean adjusted for baseline value and other stratification factors. Placebo multiple imputation, using baseline and 24-week values from the placebo arm, was applied to model a washout of the treatment effect for patients missing 24-week values (HbA1c, fasting serum glucose, and body weight).
c Patients with missing HbA1c data at Week 24 were considered as non-responders.
†† p<0.001 for superiority of TRULICITY compared to placebo, overall type I error controlled. |
Insulin Glargine Controlled Trial (Add-On To Metformin And Sulfonylurea)
In this open-label comparator trial (double-blind with respect to TRULICITY dose assignment) with primary endpoint at 52 weeks, 807 adult patients were randomized to and received TRULICITY 0.75 mg once weekly, TRULICITY 1.5 mg once weekly, or insulin glargine once daily, all as add-on to maximally tolerated doses of metformin and glimepiride. Randomization occurred after a 10-week lead-in period; during the initial 2 weeks of the lead-in period, patients were titrated to maximally tolerated doses of metformin and glimepiride. This was followed by a 6- to 8-week glycemic stabilization period prior to randomization.
Patients randomized to insulin glargine were started on a dose of 10 units once daily. Insulin glargine dose adjustments occurred twice weekly for the first 4 weeks of treatment based on self-measured fasting plasma glucose (FPG), followed by once weekly titration through Week 8 of treatment, utilizing an algorithm that targeted a fasting plasma glucose of <100 mg/dL. Only 24% of patients were titrated to goal at the 52-week primary endpoint. The dose of glimepiride could be reduced or discontinued after randomization (at the discretion of the investigator) in the event of persistent hypoglycemia. The dose of glimepiride was reduced or discontinued in 28%, 32%, and 29% of patients randomized to TRULICITY 0.75 mg, TRULICITY 1.5 mg, and glargine.
Patients had a mean age of 57 years; mean duration of type 2 diabetes of 9 years; 51% were male; race: White, Black and Asian were 71%, 1% and 17%, respectively; and 0% of the trial population were in the US.
Treatment with TRULICITY once weekly resulted in a reduction in HbA1c from baseline at 52 weeks when used in combination with metformin and sulfonylurea (Table 10). The difference in observed effect size between TRULICITY 0.75 mg and 1.5 mg, respectively, and glargine in this trial excluded the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 0.4%.
Table 10: Results at Week 52 of TRULICITY Compared to Insulin Glargine, Both as Add-on to Metformin and Sulfonylurea in Adult Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitusa
|
52-Week Primary Time Point |
TRULICITY
0.75 mg |
TRULICITY
1.5 mg |
Insulin Glargine |
| Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population (N)‡ |
272 |
273 |
262 |
| HbA1c (%) (Mean) |
| Baseline |
8.1 |
8.2 |
8.1 |
| Change from baselineb |
-0.8 |
-1.1 |
-0.6 |
| Fasting Serum Glucose (mg/dL) (Mean) |
| Baseline |
161 |
165 |
163 |
| Change from baselineb |
-16 |
-27 |
-32 |
| Difference from insulin glargineb (95% CI) |
16 (9, 23) |
5 (-2, 12) |
- |
| Body Weight (kg) (Mean) |
| Baseline |
86.4 |
85.2 |
87.6 |
| Change from baselineb |
-1.3 |
-1.9 |
1.4 |
| Difference from insulinb (95% CI) |
-2.8
(-3.4, -2.2) |
-3.3
(-3.9, -2.7) |
- |
Abbreviations: HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c.
a, Intent-to-treat population. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used to impute missing data. Data post-onset of rescue therapy are treated as missing. At Week 52, primary efficacy was missing for 17%, 13% and 12% of individuals randomized to TRULICITY 0.75 mg, TRULICITY 1.5 mg and glargine, respectively.
b Least-squares (LS) mean adjusted for baseline value and other stratification factors.
‡ Patients included in the analysis are a subset of the ITT population that had at least one post-baseline assessment. The primary analysis included 267, 263 and 259 individuals randomized to TRULICITY 0.75 mg, TRULICITY 1.5 mg, and glargine, respectively. |
Placebo-Controlled Trial (Add-On To Basal Insulin, With Or Without Metformin)
In this 28-week placebo-controlled, double-blind trial, 300 adult patients were randomized to placebo or once weekly TRULICITY 1.5 mg, as add-on to titrated basal insulin glargine (with or without metformin). Patients had a mean age of 60 years; mean duration of type 2 diabetes of 13 years; 58% were male; race: White, Black, and Asian were 94%, 4%, and 0.3%, respectively; and 20% of the trial population was in the US.
The mean starting dose of insulin glargine was 37 units/day for patients receiving placebo and 41 units/day for patients receiving TRULICITY 1.5 mg. At randomization, the initial insulin glargine dose in patients with HbA1c <8.0% was reduced by 20%.
At 28 weeks, treatment with once weekly TRULICITY 1.5 mg resulted in a statistically significant reduction in HbA1c compared to placebo (Table 11).
Table 11: Results at Week 28 of TRULICITY Compared to Placebo as Add-On to Basal Insulin in Adult Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitusa
|
28-Week Primary Time Point |
| Placebo |
TRULICITY
1.5 mg |
| Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population (N) |
150 |
150 |
| HbA1c (%) (Mean) |
| Baseline |
8.3 |
8.4 |
| Change from baselineb |
-0.7 |
-1.4 |
| Difference from placebob (95% CI) |
|
-0.7
(-0.9, -0.5)†† |
| Percentage of patients HbA1c <7.0%c |
33 |
67†† |
| Fasting Serum Glucose (mg/dL) (Mean) |
| Baseline |
156 |
157 |
| Change from baselineb |
-30 |
-44 |
| Difference from placebob (95% CI) |
|
-14 (-23, -4)† |
| Body Weight (kg) (Mean) |
| Baseline |
92.6 |
93.3 |
| Change from baselineb |
0.8 |
-1.3 |
| Difference from placebob (95% CI) |
|
-2.1
(-2.9, -1.4)†† |
Abbreviations: HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c.
a Intent-to-treat population. At Week 28, primary efficacy was missing for 12% and 8% of individuals randomized to placebo and TRULICITY 1.5 mg, respectively.
bLeast-squares mean from ANCOVA adjusted for baseline value and other stratification factors. Placebo multiple imputation, with respect to baseline values, was used to model a wash-out of the treatment effect for patients having missing Week 28 data.
c Patients with missing HbA1c data at Week 28 were considered as non-responders.
†† p<0.001 for superiority of TRULICITY 1.5 mg compared to placebo, overall type I error controlled.
† p≤0.005 for superiority of TRULICITY 1.5 mg compared to placebo, overall type I error controlled. |
Insulin Glargine-Controlled Trial (Combination With Prandial Insulin, With Or Without Metformin)
In this open-label comparator trial (double-blind with respect to TRULICITY dose assignment) with primary endpoint at 26 weeks, 884 adult patients on 1 or 2 insulin injections per day were enrolled. Randomization occurred after a 9-week lead-in period; during the initial 2 weeks of the lead-in period, patients continued their pre-trial insulin regimen but could be initiated and/or up-titrated on metformin, based on investigator discretion; this was followed by a 7-week glycemic stabilization period prior to randomization.
At randomization, patients discontinued their pre-trial insulin regimen and were randomized to TRULICITY 0.75 mg once weekly, TRULICITY 1.5 mg once weekly, or insulin glargine once daily, all in combination with prandial insulin lispro 3 times daily, with or without metformin. Insulin lispro was titrated in each arm based on preprandial and bedtime glucose, and insulin glargine was titrated to a fasting plasma glucose goal of <100 mg/dL. Only 36% of patients randomized to glargine were titrated to the fasting glucose goal at the 26-week primary timepoint.
Patients had a mean age of 59 years; mean duration of type 2 diabetes of 13 years; 54% were male; race: White, Black and Asian were 79%, 10% and 4%, respectively; and 33% of the trial population were in the US.
Treatment with TRULICITY 0.75 mg and 1.5 mg once weekly resulted in a reduction in HbA1c from baseline. The difference in observed effect size between TRULICITY 0.75 mg and 1.5 mg, respectively, and glargine in this trial excluded the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 0.4% (Table 12).
Table 12: Results at Week 26 of TRULICITY Compared to Insulin Glargine, Both in Combination with Insulin Lispro in Adult Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitusa
|
26-Week Primary Time Point |
TRULICITY
0.75 mg |
TRULICITY
1.5 mg |
Insulin Glargine |
| Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population (N)‡ |
293 |
295 |
296 |
| HbA1c (%) (Mean) |
| Baseline |
8.4 |
8.5 |
8.5 |
| Change from baselineb |
-1.6 |
-1.6 |
-1.4 |
| Fasting Serum Glucose (mg/dL) (Mean) |
| Baseline |
150 |
157 |
154 |
| Change from baselineb |
4 |
-5 |
-28 |
| Difference from insulin glargineb(95% CI) |
32 (24, 41) |
24 (15, 32) |
- |
| Body Weight (kg) (Mean) |
| Baseline |
91.7 |
91.0 |
90.8 |
| Change from baselineb |
0.2 |
-0.9 |
2.3 |
| Difference from insulin glargineb (95% CI) |
-2.2
(-2.8, -1.5) |
-3.2
(-3.8, -2.6) |
- |
Abbreviation: HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c
a Intent-to-treat population. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used to impute missing data. Data post-onset of rescue therapy are treated as missing. At Week 26, primary efficacy was missing for 14%, 15%, and 14% of individuals randomized to TRULICITY 0.75 mg, TRULICITY 1.5 mg and glargine, respectively.
bLeast-squares (LS) mean adjusted for baseline value and other stratification factors.
‡ Patients included in the analysis are a subset of the ITT population that had at least one post-baseline assessment. The primary analysis included 275, 273 and 276 individuals randomized to TRULICITY 0.75 mg, TRULICITY 1.5 mg, and glargine, respectively. |
Glycemic Control Trials In Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus And Moderate To Severe Chronic Kidney Disease
In this open-label comparator trial (double-blind with respect to TRULICITY dose assignment) with primary endpoint at 26 weeks, a total of 576 adult patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized and treated to compare TRULICITY 0.75 mg and 1.5 mg with insulin glargine (NCT01621178).
Patients on insulin and other antidiabetic therapy (e.g., oral antidiabetic drugs, pramlintide) had non-insulin therapies discontinued and had their insulin dose adjusted for 12 weeks prior to randomization. Patients on insulin therapy alone maintained a stable insulin dose for 3 weeks prior to randomization. At randomization, patients discontinued their pre-trial insulin regimen and patients were randomized to TRULICITY 0.75 mg once weekly, TRULICITY 1.5 mg once weekly, or insulin glargine once daily, all in combination with prandial insulin lispro. For patients randomized to insulin glargine, the initial insulin glargine dose was based on the basal insulin dose prior to randomization. Insulin glargine was allowed to be titrated with a fasting plasma glucose goal of ≤150 mg/dL. Insulin lispro was allowed to be titrated with a preprandial and bedtime glucose goal of ≤180 mg/dL.
Patients had a mean age of 65 years; a mean duration of type 2 diabetes of 18 years; 52% were male; race: White, Black, and Asian were 69%, 16%, and 3%, respectively; and 32% of the trial population were in the US. At baseline, overall mean eGFR was 38 mL/min/1.73 m2, 30% of patients had eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2, and 45% of patients had macroalbuminuria. Patients on over 70 units/day of basal insulin were excluded from the trial.
Treatment with TRULICITY 0.75 mg and 1.5 mg once weekly resulted in a reduction in HbA1c at 26-weeks from baseline. The difference in observed effect size between TRULICITY 0.75 mg and 1.5 mg, respectively, and glargine in this trial excluded the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 0.4%. Mean fasting plasma glucose increased in the TRULICITY arms (Table 13).
Mean baseline body weight was 90.9 kg, 88.1 kg, and 88.2 kg in the TRULICITY 0.75 mg, TRULICITY 1.5 mg, and insulin glargine arms, respectively. The mean changes from baseline at Week 26 were -1.1, -2, and 1.9 kg in the TRULICITY 0.75 mg, TRULICITY 1.5 mg, and insulin glargine arms, respectively.
Table 13: Results at Week 26 of TRULICITY Compared to Insulin Glargine, Both in Combination with Insulin Lispro, in Patients with Moderate to Severe Chronic Kidney Disease in Adult Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitusa
|
26-Week Primary Time Point |
TRULICITY
0.75 mg |
TRULICITY
1.5 mg |
Insulin Glargine |
| Intent-to-Treat Population (N) |
190 |
192 |
194 |
| HbA1c (%) (Mean) |
| Baseline |
8.6 |
8.6 |
8.6 |
| Change from baselineb |
-0.9 |
-1.0 |
-1.0 |
| Difference from insulin glargineb (95% CI) |
0.0
(-0.2, 0.3) |
-0.1
(-0.3, 0.2) |
|
| Percentage of patients HbA1c <8.0% |
73 |
75 |
74 |
| Fasting Serum Glucose (mg/dL) (Mean) |
| Baseline |
167 |
161 |
170 |
| Change from baselineb |
6 |
14 |
-23 |
| Difference from insulin glargineb (95% CI) |
30 (16, 43) |
37 (24, 50) |
|
Abbreviation: HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c
a Intent-to-treat population (all randomized and treated patients) was used in the analysis regardless of discontinuation of study drug or initiation of rescue therapy. At Week 26, primary efficacy was missing for 12%, 15%, and 9% of individuals randomized to and treated with TRULICITY 0.75 mg, TRULICITY 1.5 mg, and insulin glargine, respectively. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation within treatment group.
b Least-squares (LS) mean from ANCOVA pattern mixture model adjusted for baseline value and other stratification factors. |
Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial In Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus And Cardiovascular Disease Or Multiple Cardiovascular Risk Factors
The REWIND trial (NCT01394952) was a multi-national, multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. In this trial, 9901 adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and established cardiovascular (CV) disease or multiple cardiovascular risk factors were randomized to TRULICITY 1.5 mg or placebo both added to standard of care. The median follow-up duration was 5.4 years. The primary endpoint was the time to the first occurrence of a composite 3- component Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) outcome, which included CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and non-fatal stroke.
Patients eligible to enter the trial were 50 years of age or older who had type 2 diabetes mellitus, had an HbA1c value ≤9.5% with no lower limit at screening, and had either established CV disease, or did not have established CV disease but had multiple CV risk factors. Patients who were confirmed to have established CV disease (31.5% of randomized patients) had a history of at least one of the following: MI (16.2%); myocardial ischemia by a stress test or with cardiac imaging (9.3%); ischemic stroke (5.3%); coronary, carotid, or peripheral artery revascularization (18.0%); unstable angina (5.9%); or hospitalization for unstable angina with at least one of the following: ECG changes, myocardial ischemia on imaging, or a need for percutaneous coronary intervention (12.0%). Patients confirmed to be without established CV disease, but with multiple CV risk factors, comprised 62.8% of the randomized trial population.
At baseline, demographic and disease characteristics were balanced between treatment groups. Patients had a mean age of 66 years; 46% were female; race: White, Black, and Asian were 76%, 7%, and 4%, respectively.
The median baseline HbA1c was 7.2%. The mean duration of type 2 diabetes was 10.5 years and the mean BMI was 32.3 kg/m2.
At baseline, 50.5% of patients had mild renal impairment (eGFR ≥60 but <90 mL/min/1.73m2), 21.6% had moderate renal impairment (eGFR ≥30 but <60 mL/min/1.73m2), and 1.1% of patients had severe renal impairment (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2) out of 9713 patients whose eGFR were available.
At baseline, 94.7% of patients were taking antidiabetic medication, with 10.5% of patients taking three or more antidiabetic drugs. The most common background antidiabetic drugs used at baseline were metformin (81.2%), sulfonylurea (46.0%), and insulin (23.9%). At baseline, CV disease and risk factors were managed with ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (81.5%), beta blockers (45.6%), calcium channel blockers (34.4%), diuretics (46.5%), statin therapy (66.1%), antithrombotic agents (58.7%), and aspirin (51.7%). During the trial, investigators were to modify antidiabetic and cardiovascular medications to achieve local standard of care treatment targets with respect to blood glucose, lipids, and blood pressure, and manage patients recovering from an acute coronary syndrome or stroke event per local treatment guidelines.
For the primary analysis, a Cox proportional hazards model was used to test for superiority. Type I error was controlled across multiple tests. TRULICITY significantly reduced the risk of first occurrence of primary composite endpoint of CV death, non-fatal MI, or non-fatal stroke (HR: 0.88, 95% CI 0.79, 0.99). Refer to Figure 6 and Table 14.
Vital status was available for 99.7% of patients in the trial. A total of 1128 deaths were recorded during the REWIND trial. A majority of the deaths in the trial were adjudicated as CV deaths, and non-CV deaths were comparable between the treatment groups (4.4% in patients treated with TRULICITY and 5.0% in patients treated with placebo). There were 536 all-cause deaths (10.8%) in the dulaglutide group compared to 592 deaths (12.0%) in the placebo group.
Figure 6. KAPLAN MEIER CURVE: Time to First Occurrence of MACE in the REWIND Trial
Table 14: Treatment Effect for MACE and the Individual Components in the REWIND Trial, Median Trial Observation Time of 5.4 years in Adult Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitusa
| Time to First Occurrence of: |
TRULICITY
N=4949 |
Placebo
N=4952 |
Hazard Ratio
(95% CI)b |
| Composite of non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, cardiovascular death (MACE)d |
594
(12.0%) |
663
(13.4%) |
0.88
(0.79, 0.99)c |
| Cardiovascular deathd,e |
317
(6.4%) |
346
(7.0%) |
0.91
(0.78, 1.06) |
| Non-fatal myocardial infarctiond,e |
205
(4.1%) |
212
(4.3%) |
0.96
(0.79, 1.16) |
| Non-fatal stroked,e |
135
(2.7%) |
175
(3.5%) |
0.76
(0.61, 0.95) |
| Fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarctiond,e |
223
(4.5%) |
231
(4.7%) |
0.96
(0.79, 1.15) |
| Fatal or non-fatal stroked,e |
158
(3.2%) |
205
(4.1%) |
0.76
(0.62, 0.94) |
a All randomized patients.
b Cox-proportional hazards model with treatment as a factor. Type I error was controlled for the primary and secondary endpoints.
c p=0.026 for superiority (2-sided).
d Number and percentage of patients with events.
e Results for components of MACE, fatal and non-fatal stroke, and fatal and non-fatal MI are listed descriptively for supportive purposes. No statistical significance should be inferred since these CIs are not adjusted for multiplicity. |
Glycemic Control Trial In Pediatric Patients 10 Years Of Age And Older With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
In this 26-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm, multicenter trial with an open-label extension for an additional 26 weeks,154 pediatric patients 10 years of age and older with type 2 diabetes mellitus, who had inadequate glycemic control despite diet and exercise, were randomized to subcutaneous TRULICITY once weekly (0.75 mg and 1.5 mg) or subcutaneous placebo once weekly in combination with or without metformin and/or basal insulin treatment (NCT02963766).
Overall, in this trial demographic and baseline disease characteristics were comparable across the treatment groups. At baseline, 71% of patients were female, and the mean age was 14.5 years (ranging from 10 to 17 years). Overall, 55% were White, 15% were Black or African American, 12% were Asian, 10% were American Indian or Alaska Native, 5% were other races, and 3% had unknown race. Additionally, 55% were Hispanic or Latino, 42% were not Hispanic or Latino, and 3% had unknown ethnicity. At baseline, the mean duration of type 2 diabetes mellitus was 2 years, mean HbA1c was 8.1%, mean weight was 90.5 kg and mean BMI was 34.1 kg/m2.
In this trial, once weekly TRULICITY (0.75 mg and 1.5 mg, pooled) (with or without metformin and/or basal insulin) was superior to placebo (p<0.001) in the change from baseline at Week 26 in HbA1c in pediatric patients 10 years of age and older with type 2 diabetes mellitus (see Table 15).
Table 15: Glycemic Results at Week 26 in Pediatric Patients 10 Years of Age and Older with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Inadequate Glycemic Control Despite Diet and Exercise (With or Without Metformin and/or Basal Insulin)
|
Placebo |
TRULICITY 0.75 mg
once weekly |
TRULICITY 1.5 mg
once weekly |
TRULICITY once
weekly
Pooleda |
| Intent-to-Treat Population (N) |
51 |
51 |
52 |
103 |
| HbA1c (%) (Mean)c |
| Baseline |
8.1 |
7.9 |
8.2 |
8.0 |
| Change from baseline at Week 26b |
0.6 |
-0.6 |
-0.9 |
-0.8 |
Difference from placebo
(95% CI)b |
- |
-1.2
(-1.8, -0.6) |
-1.5
(-2.1, -0.9) |
-1.4
(-1.9, -0.8) |
| Percentage of Patients with HbA1c <7.0% at Week 26d |
14% |
55% |
48% |
52% |
| Fasting Blood Glucose (mg/dL) (Mean)c |
| Baseline |
159 |
149 |
163 |
156 |
| Change from baseline at Week 26b |
17.1 |
-12.8 |
-24.9 |
-18.9 |
Difference from placebo
(95% CI)b |
- |
-29.9
(-50.7, -9.1) |
-42.0
(-63.0, -20.9) |
-35.9
(-54.2, - 17.6) |
Abbreviations: HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c.
a Combined results for TRULICITY 0.75 mg and 1.5 mg. The comparison of the two dosages together and individually with placebo was prespecified with overall type I error controlled.
b The change from baseline and difference from placebo were analyzed using analysis of covariance with effects for treatment, the baseline value as a covariate, and stratification factors which were HbA1c at screening (< 8% vs >= 8%), insulin use at baseline (yes/no), metformin use at baseline (yes/no).
c For HbA1c and Fasting Blood Glucose, multiple imputation was performed for missing data guided by washout method. At Week 26 primary efficacy (HbA1c) was missing for 8%, 6%, and 10% of patients on placebo, TRULICITY 0.75 mg and TRULICITY 1.5 mg respectively.
d For percentage of patients HbA1c < 7%, missing data was imputed as not achieving the target. |