CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
TENORMIN is a beta1-selective (cardioselective) beta-adrenergic
receptor blocking agent without membrane stabilizing or intrinsic
sympathomimetic (partial agonist) activities. This preferential effect is not
absolute, however, and at higher doses, TENORMIN inhibits beta2-adrenoreceptors,
chiefly located in the bronchial and vascular musculature.
Pharmacokinetics And Metabolism
In man, absorption of an oral dose is rapid and
consistent but incomplete. Approximately 50% of an oral dose is absorbed from
the gastrointestinal tract, the remainder being excreted unchanged in the
feces. Peak blood levels are reached between two (2) and four (4) hours after
ingestion. Unlike propranolol or metoprolol, but like nadolol, TENORMIN undergoes
little or no metabolism by the liver, and the absorbed portion is eliminated
primarily by renal excretion. Over 85% of an intravenous dose is excreted in
urine within 24 hours compared with approximately 50% for an oral dose. TENORMIN
also differs from propranolol in that only a small amount (6%-16%) is bound to
proteins in the plasma. This kinetic profile results in relatively consistent
plasma drug levels with about a fourfold interpatient variation.
The elimination half-life of oral TENORMIN is approximately
6 to 7 hours, and there is no alteration of the kinetic profile of the drug by
chronic administration. Following intravenous administration, peak plasma
levels are reached within 5 minutes. Declines from peak levels are rapid (5- to
10-fold) during the first 7 hours; thereafter, plasma levels decay with a
half-life similar to that of orally administered drug. Following oral doses of
50 mg or 100 mg, both beta-blocking and antihypertensive effects persist for at
least 24 hours. When renal function is impaired, elimination of TENORMIN is
closely related to the glomerular filtration rate; significant accumulation
occurs when the creatinine clearance falls below 35 mL/min/1.73m². (See DOSAGE
AND ADMINISTRATION.)
Pharmacodynamics
In standard animal or human pharmacological tests, beta-adrenoreceptor
blocking activity of TENORMIN has been demonstrated by: (1) reduction in
resting and exercise heart rate and cardiac output, (2) reduction of systolic
and diastolic blood pressure at rest and on exercise, (3) inhibition of
isoproterenol induced tachycardia, and (4) reduction in reflex orthostatic
tachycardia.
A significant beta-blocking effect of TENORMIN, as measured
by reduction of exercise tachycardia, is apparent within one hour following
oral administration of a single dose. This effect is maximal at about 2 to 4
hours, and persists for at least 24 hours. Maximum reduction in exercise
tachycardia occurs within 5 minutes of an intravenous dose. For both orally and
intravenously administered drug, the duration of action is dose related and
also bears a linear relationship to the logarithm of plasma TENORMIN
concentration. The effect on exercise tachycardia of a single 10 mg intravenous
dose is largely dissipated by 12 hours, whereas beta-blocking activity of
single oral doses of 50 mg and 100 mg is still evident beyond 24 hours
following administration. However, as has been shown for all beta-blocking
agents, the antihypertensive effect does not appear to be related to plasma
level.
In normal subjects, the beta1 selectivity of TENORMIN has
been shown by its reduced ability to reverse the beta2-mediated vasodilating
effect of isoproterenol as compared to equivalent beta-blocking doses of
propranolol. In asthmatic patients, a dose of TENORMIN producing a greater effect
on resting heart rate than propranolol resulted in much less increase in airway
resistance. In a placebo controlled comparison of approximately equipotent oral
doses of several beta blockers, TENORMIN produced a significantly smaller decrease
of FEV1 than nonselective beta blockers such as propranolol and, unlike those
agents, did not inhibit bronchodilation in response to isoproterenol.
Consistent with its negative chronotropic effect due to
beta blockade of the SA node, TENORMIN increases sinus cycle length and sinus
node recovery time. Conduction in the AV node is also prolonged. TENORMIN is
devoid of membrane stabilizing activity, and increasing the dose well beyond
that producing beta blockade does not further depress myocardial contractility.
Several studies have demonstrated a moderate (approximately 10%) increase in
stroke volume at rest and during exercise.
In controlled clinical trials, TENORMIN, given as a
single daily oral dose, was an effective antihypertensive agent providing
24-hour reduction of blood pressure. TENORMIN has been studied in combination
with thiazide type diuretics, and the blood pressure effects of the combination
are approximately additive. TENORMIN is also compatible with methyldopa,
hydralazine, and prazosin, each combination resulting in a larger fall in blood
pressure than with the single agents. The dose range of TENORMIN is narrow and increasing
the dose beyond 100 mg once daily is not associated with increased
antihypertensive effect. The mechanisms of the antihypertensive effects of
beta-blocking agents have not been established. Several possible mechanisms
have been proposed and include: (1) competitive antagonism of catecholamines at
peripheral (especially cardiac) adrenergic neuron sites, leading to decreased
cardiac output, (2) a central effect leading to reduced sympathetic outflow to
the periphery, and (3) suppression of renin activity. The results from
long-term studies have not shown any diminution of the antihypertensive
efficacy of TENORMIN with prolonged use.
By blocking the positive chronotropic and inotropic
effects of catecholamines and by decreasing blood pressure, atenolol generally
reduces the oxygen requirements of the heart at any given level of effort,
making it useful for many patients in the long-term management of angina
pectoris. On the other hand, atenolol can increase oxygen requirements by
increasing left ventricular fiber length and end diastolic pressure,
particularly in patients with heart failure.
In a multicenter clinical trial (ISIS-1) conducted in
16,027 patients with suspected myocardial infarction, patients presenting
within 12 hours (mean = 5 hours) after the onset of pain were randomized to
either conventional therapy plus TENORMIN (n = 8,037), or conventional therapy
alone (n = 7,990). Patients with a heart rate of < 50 bpm or systolic blood
pressure < 100 mm Hg, or with other contraindications to beta blockade were
excluded. Thirty-eight percent of each group were treated within 4 hours of
onset of pain. The mean time from onset of pain to entry was 5.0 ± 2.7 hours in
both groups. Patients in the TENORMIN group were to receive TENORMIN I.V.
Injection 5-10 mg given over 5 minutes plus TENORMIN Tablets 50 mg every 12
hours orally on the first study day (the first oral dose administered about 15
minutes after the IV dose) followed by either TENORMIN Tablets 100 mg once
daily or TENORMIN Tablets 50 mg twice daily on days 2-7. The groups were
similar in demographic and medical history characteristics and in
electrocardiographic evidence of myocardial infarction, bundle branch block,
and first degree atrioventricular block at entry.
During the treatment period (days 0-7), the vascular
mortality rates were 3.89% in the TENORMIN group (313 deaths) and 4.57% in the
control group (365 deaths). This absolute difference in rates, 0.68%, is
statistically significant at the P < 0.05 level. The absolute difference
translates into a proportional reduction of 15% (3.89-4.57/4.57 = -0.15). The 95%
confidence limits are 1%-27%. Most of the difference was attributed to
mortality in days 0-1 (TENORMIN – 121 deaths; control - 171 deaths).
Despite the large size of the ISIS-1 trial, it is not
possible to identify clearly subgroups of patients most likely or least likely
to benefit from early treatment with atenolol. Good clinical judgment suggests,
however, that patients who are dependent on sympathetic stimulation for
maintenance of adequate cardiac output and blood pressure are not good candidates
for beta blockade. Indeed, the trial protocol reflected that judgment by
excluding patients with blood pressure consistently below 100 mm Hg systolic.
The overall results of the study are compatible with the possibility that patients
with borderline blood pressure (less than 120 mm Hg systolic), especially if
over 60 years of age, are less likely to benefit.
The mechanism through which atenolol improves survival in
patients with definite or suspected acute myocardial infarction is unknown, as
is the case for other beta blockers in the postinfarction setting. Atenolol, in
addition to its effects on survival, has shown other clinical benefits
including reduced frequency of ventricular premature beats, reduced chest pain,
and reduced enzyme elevation.
Atenolol Geriatric Pharmacology
In general, elderly patients present higher atenolol
plasma levels with total clearance values about 50% lower than younger
subjects. The half-life is markedly longer in the elderly compared to younger
subjects. The reduction in atenolol clearance follows the general trend that
the elimination of renally excreted drugs is decreased with increasing age.