Clinical Pharmacology for Steglatro
Mechanism Of Action
SGLT2 is the predominant transporter responsible for reabsorption of glucose from the glomerular filtrate back into the circulation. Ertugliflozin is an inhibitor of SGLT2. By inhibiting SGLT2, ertugliflozin reduces renal reabsorption of filtered glucose and lowers the renal threshold for glucose, and thereby increases urinary glucose excretion.
Pharmacodynamics
Urinary Glucose Excretion And Urinary Volume
Dose-dependent increases in the amount of glucose excreted in urine were observed in healthy subjects and in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus following single- and multiple-dose administration of ertugliflozin. Dose-response modeling indicates that ertugliflozin 5 mg and 15 mg result in near maximal urinary glucose excretion (UGE). Enhanced UGE is maintained after multiple-dose administration. UGE with ertugliflozin also results in increases in urinary volume.
Cardiac Electrophysiology
The effect of STEGLATRO on QTc interval was evaluated in a Phase 1 randomized, placebo- and positive-controlled 3-period crossover study in 42 healthy subjects. At 6.7 times the therapeutic exposures with maximum recommended dose, STEGLATRO does not prolong QTc to any clinically relevant extent.
Pharmacokinetics
The pharmacokinetics of ertugliflozin are similar in healthy subjects and patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The steady state mean plasma AUC and Cmax were 398 ng·hr/mL and 81.3 ng/mL, respectively, with 5 mg ertugliflozin once-daily treatment, and 1,193 ng·hr/mL and 268 ng/mL, respectively, with 15 mg ertugliflozin once-daily treatment. Steady-state is reached after 4 to 6 days of once-daily dosing with ertugliflozin. Ertugliflozin does not exhibit time-dependent pharmacokinetics and accumulates in plasma up to 10-40% following multiple dosing.
Absorption
Following single-dose oral administration of 5 mg and 15 mg of ertugliflozin, peak plasma concentrations (median Tmax) of ertugliflozin occur at 1 hour postdose under fasted conditions. Plasma Cmax and AUC of ertugliflozin increase in a dose-proportional manner following single doses from 0.5 mg (0.1 times the lowest recommended dose) to 300 mg (20 times the highest recommended dose) and following multiple doses from 1 mg (0.2 times the lowest recommended dose) to 100 mg (6.7 times the highest recommended dose). The absolute oral bioavailability of ertugliflozin following administration of a 15 mg dose is approximately 100%.
Effect of Food
Administration of STEGLATRO with a high-fat and high-calorie meal decreases ertugliflozin Cmax by 29% and prolongs Tmax by 1 hour, but does not alter AUC as compared with the fasted state. The observed effect of food on ertugliflozin pharmacokinetics is not considered clinically relevant, and ertugliflozin may be administered with or without food. In Phase 3 clinical trials, STEGLATRO was administered without regard to meals.
Distribution
The mean steady-state volume of distribution of ertugliflozin following an intravenous dose is 85.5 L. Plasma protein binding of ertugliflozin is 93.6% and is independent of ertugliflozin plasma concentrations. Plasma protein binding is not meaningfully altered in patients with renal or hepatic impairment. The bloodto- plasma concentration ratio of ertugliflozin is 0.66.
Elimination
Metabolism
Metabolism is the primary clearance mechanism for ertugliflozin. The major metabolic pathway for ertugliflozin is UGT1A9 and UGT2B7-mediated O-glucuronidation to two glucuronides that are pharmacologically inactive at clinically relevant concentrations. CYP-mediated (oxidative) metabolism of ertugliflozin is minimal (12%).
Excretion
The mean systemic plasma clearance following an intravenous 100 μg dose was 11.2 L/hr. The mean elimination half-life in type 2 diabetic patients with normal renal function was estimated to be 16.6 hours based on the population pharmacokinetic analysis. Following administration of an oral [14C]-ertugliflozin solution to healthy subjects, approximately 40.9% and 50.2% of the drug-related radioactivity was eliminated in feces and urine, respectively. Only 1.5% of the administered dose was excreted as unchanged ertugliflozin in urine and 33.8% as unchanged ertugliflozin in feces, which is likely due to biliary excretion of glucuronide metabolites and subsequent hydrolysis to parent.
Specific Populations
Patients With Renal Impairment
In a clinical pharmacology study in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment (as determined by eGFR), following a single-dose administration of 15 mg STEGLATRO, the mean increases in AUC of ertugliflozin were 1.6-, 1.7-, and 1.6-fold, respectively, for mild, moderate and severe renally impaired patients, compared to subjects with normal renal function. These increases in ertugliflozin AUC are not considered clinically meaningful. The 24-hour urinary glucose excretion declined with increasing severity of renal impairment [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS and Use In Specific Populations]. The plasma protein binding of ertugliflozin was unaffected in patients with renal impairment.
Patients With Hepatic Impairment
Moderate hepatic impairment (based on the Child-Pugh classification) did not result in an increase in exposure of ertugliflozin. The AUC of ertugliflozin decreased by approximately 13%, and Cmax decreased by approximately 21% compared to subjects with normal hepatic function. This decrease in ertugliflozin exposure is not considered clinically meaningful. There is no clinical experience in patients with Child-Pugh class C (severe) hepatic impairment. The plasma protein binding of ertugliflozin was unaffected in patients with moderate hepatic impairment [see Use In Specific Populations].
Effects Of Age, Body Weight, Gender, And Race
Based on a population pharmacokinetic analysis, age, body weight, gender, and race do not have a clinically meaningful effect on the pharmacokinetics of ertugliflozin.
Drug Interaction Studies
In Vitro Assessment Of Drug Interactions
In in vitro studies, ertugliflozin and ertugliflozin glucuronides did not inhibit CYP450 isoenzymes (CYPs) 1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2C8, 2B6, 2D6, or 3A4, and did not induce CYPs 1A2, 2B6, or 3A4. Ertugliflozin was not a time-dependent inhibitor of CYP3A in vitro. Ertugliflozin did not inhibit UGT1A6, 1A9, or 2B7 in vitro and was a weak inhibitor (IC50 >39 μM) of UGT1A1 and 1A4. Ertugliflozin glucuronides did not inhibit UGT1A1, 1A4, 1A6, 1A9, or 2B7 in vitro. Overall, ertugliflozin is unlikely to affect the pharmacokinetics of drugs eliminated by these enzymes. Ertugliflozin is a substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) transporters and is not a substrate of organic anion transporters (OAT1, OAT3), organic cation transporters (OCT1, OCT2), or organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATP1B1, OATP1B3). Ertugliflozin or ertugliflozin glucuronides do not meaningfully inhibit P-gp, OCT2, OAT1, or OAT3 transporters, or transporting polypeptides OATP1B1 and OATP1B3, at clinically relevant concentrations. Overall, ertugliflozin is unlikely to affect the pharmacokinetics of concurrently administered medications that are substrates of these transporters.
In Vivo Assessment Of Drug Interactions
No dose adjustment of STEGLATRO is recommended when coadministered with commonly prescribed medicinal products. Ertugliflozin pharmacokinetics were similar with and without coadministration of metformin, glimepiride, sitagliptin, and simvastatin in healthy subjects (see Figure 1). Coadministration of ertugliflozin with multiple doses of 600 mg once-daily rifampin (an inducer of UGT and CYP enzymes) resulted in approximately 39% and 15% mean reductions in ertugliflozin AUC and Cmax, respectively, relative to ertugliflozin administered alone. These changes in exposure are not considered clinically relevant. Ertugliflozin had no clinically relevant effect on the pharmacokinetics of metformin, glimepiride, sitagliptin, and simvastatin when coadministered in healthy subjects (see Figure 2). Physiologically-based PK (PBPK) modeling suggests that coadministration of mefenamic acid (UGT inhibitor) may increase the AUC and Cmax of ertugliflozin by 1.51- and 1.19-fold, respectively. These predicted changes in exposure are not considered clinically relevant.
Figure 1: Effects of Other Drugs on the Pharmacokinetics of Ertugliflozin
Figure 2: Effects of Ertugliflozin on the Pharmacokinetics of Other Drugs
Clinical Studies
Glycemic Control Trials In Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
STEGLATRO has been studied as monotherapy and in combination with metformin, sitagliptin, a sulfonylurea, insulin (with or without metformin), metformin plus sitagliptin, metformin plus a sulfonylurea and compared to a sulfonylurea (glimepiride). STEGLATRO has also been studied in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and moderate renal impairment.
In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treatment with STEGLATRO reduced hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) compared to placebo. Reduction in HbA1c was generally similar across subgroups defined by age, sex, race, geographic region, baseline body mass index (BMI), and duration of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Monotherapy
A total of 461 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled (HbA1c between 7% and 10.5%) on diet and exercise participated in a randomized, double-blind, multi-center, 26-week, placebocontrolled study (NCT01958671) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of STEGLATRO monotherapy. These patients, who were either treatment naïve or not receiving any background antihyperglycemic treatment ≥8 weeks, entered a 2-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period and were randomized to placebo, STEGLATRO 5 mg, or STEGLATRO 15 mg, administered once daily.
At Week 26, treatment with STEGLATRO at 5 mg or 15 mg daily provided statistically significant reductions in HbA1c compared to placebo. STEGLATRO also resulted in a greater proportion of patients achieving an HbA1c <7% compared with placebo (see Table 4 and Figure 3).
Table 4: Results at Week 26 from a Placebo-Controlled Monotherapy Study of STEGLATRO in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus*.
|
Placebo |
STEGLATRO 5 mg |
STEGLATRO 15 mg |
| HbA1c (%) |
N = 153 |
N = 155 |
N = 151 |
| Baseline (mean) |
8.1 |
8.2 |
8.4 |
| Change from baseline (LS mean†) |
-0.2 |
-0.7 |
-0.8 |
| Difference from placebo (LS mean†, 95% CI) |
|
-0.6‡
(-0.8, -0.4) |
-0.7‡
(-0.9, -0.4) |
| Patients [N (%)] with HbA1c <7% |
26 (16.9) |
47 (30.1) |
59 (38.8) |
| FPG (mg/dL) |
N = 150 |
N = 151 |
N = 149 |
| Baseline (mean) |
180.2 |
180.9 |
179.1 |
| Change from baseline (LS mean†) |
-11.6 |
-31.0 |
-36.4 |
| Difference from placebo (LS mean†, 95% CI) |
|
-19.4‡
(-27.6, -11.2) |
-24.8‡
(-33.2, -16.4) |
* N includes all randomized and treated patients with a baseline measurement of the outcome variable. At Week 26, the primary HbA1c endpoint was missing for 23%, 11%, and 16% of patients, and during the trial, rescue medication was initiated by 25%, 2%, and 3% of patients randomized to placebo, STEGLATRO 5 mg, and STEGLATRO 15 mg, respectively. Missing Week 26 measurements were imputed using multiple imputation with a mean equal to the baseline value of the patient. Results include measurements collected after initiation of rescue medication. For those patients who did not receive rescue medication and had values measured at 26 weeks, the mean changes from baseline for HbA1c were -0.1%, -0.8%, and -1.0% for placebo, STEGLATRO 5 mg, and STEGLATRO 15 mg, respectively.
† Intent-to-treat analysis using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline value, prior antihyperglycemic medication, and baseline eGFR.
‡ p<0.001 compared to placebo. |
The mean baseline body weight was 94.2 kg, 94.0 kg, and 90.6 kg in the placebo, STEGLATRO 5 mg, and STEGLATRO 15 mg groups, respectively. The mean changes from baseline to Week 26 were -1.0 kg, -3.0 kg, and -3.1 kg in the placebo, STEGLATRO 5 mg, and STEGLATRO 15 mg groups, respectively. The difference from placebo (95% CI) for STEGLATRO 5 mg was -2.0 kg (-2.8, -1.2) and for STEGLATRO 15 mg was -2.1 kg (-2.9, -1.3).
Figure 3: HbA1c (%) Change Over Time in a 26-Week Placebo-Controlled Monotherapy Study of STEGLATRO in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus*
Combination Therapy
Add-on Combination Therapy with Metformin
A total of 621 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled (HbA1c between 7% and 10.5%) on metformin monotherapy (≥1,500 mg/day for ≥8 weeks) participated in a randomized, doubleblind, multi-center, 26-week, placebo-controlled study (NCT02033889) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of STEGLATRO in combination with metformin. Patients entered a 2-week, single-blind, placebo run-in, and were randomized to placebo, STEGLATRO 5 mg, or STEGLATRO 15 mg administered once daily in addition to continuation of background metformin therapy.
At Week 26, treatment with STEGLATRO at 5 mg or 15 mg daily provided statistically significant reductions in HbA1c compared to placebo. STEGLATRO also resulted in a greater proportion of patients
Table 5: Results at Week 26 from a Placebo-Controlled Study for STEGLATRO Used in Combination with Metformin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus*.
|
Placebo |
STEGLATRO 5 mg |
STEGLATRO 15 mg |
| HbA1c (%) |
N = 207 |
N = 205 |
N = 201 |
| Baseline (mean) |
8.2 |
8.1 |
8.1 |
| Change from baseline (LS mean†) |
-0.2 |
-0.7 |
-0.9 |
| Difference from placebo (LS mean†, 95% CI) |
|
-0.5‡
(-0.7, -0.4) |
-0.7‡
(-0.9, -0.5) |
| Patients [N (%)] with HbA1c <7% |
38 (18.4) |
74 (36.3) |
87 (43.3) |
| FPG (mg/dL) |
N = 202 |
N = 199 |
N = 201 |
| Baseline (mean) |
169.1 |
168.1 |
167.9 |
| Change from baseline (LS mean†) |
-8.7 |
-30.3 |
-40.9 |
| Difference from placebo (LS mean†, 95% CI) |
|
-21.6‡
(-27.8, -15.5) |
-32.3‡
(-38.5, -26.0) |
* N includes all randomized and treated patients with a baseline measurement of the outcome variable. At Week 26, the primary HbA1c endpoint was missing for 12%, 6%, and 9% of patients, and during the trial, rescue medication was initiated by 18%, 3%, and 1% of patients randomized to placebo, STEGLATRO 5 mg, and STEGLATRO 15 mg, respectively. Missing Week 26 measurements were imputed using multiple imputation with a mean equal to the baseline value of the patient. Results include measurements collected after initiation of rescue medication. For those patients who did not receive rescue medication and had values measured at 26 weeks, the mean changes from baseline for HbA1c were -0.2%, -0.7%, and -1.0% for placebo, STEGLATRO 5 mg, and STEGLATRO 15 mg, respectively.
† Intent-to-treat analysis using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline value, prior antihyperglycemic medication, menopausal status and baseline eGFR.
‡ p<0.001 compared to placebo. |
The mean baseline body weight was 84.5 kg, 84.9 kg, and 85.3 kg in the placebo, STEGLATRO 5 mg, and STEGLATRO 15 mg groups, respectively. The mean changes from baseline to Week 26 were -1.4 kg, -3.2 kg, and -3.0 kg in the placebo, STEGLATRO 5 mg, and STEGLATRO 15 mg groups, respectively. The difference from placebo (95% CI) for STEGLATRO 5 mg was -1.8 kg (-2.4, -1.2) and for STEGLATRO 15 mg was -1.7 kg (-2.2, -1.1).
The mean baseline systolic blood pressure was 129.3 mmHg, 130.5 mmHg, and 130.2 mmHg in the placebo, STEGLATRO 5 mg, and STEGLATRO 15 mg groups, respectively. The mean changes from baseline to Week 26 were -1.8 mmHg, -5.1 mmHg, and -5.7 mmHg in the placebo, STEGLATRO 5 mg, and STEGLATRO 15 mg groups, respectively. The difference from placebo (95% CI) for STEGLATRO 5 mg was -3.3 mmHg (-5.6, -1.1) and for STEGLATRO 15 mg was -3.8 mmHg (-6.1, -1.5).
Active Controlled Study versus Glimepiride as Add-on Combination Therapy with Metformin
A total of 1,326 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled (HbA1c between 7% and 9%) on metformin monotherapy participated in a randomized, double-blind, multi-center, 52-week, active comparator controlled study (NCT01999218) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of STEGLATRO in combination with metformin. These patients, who were receiving metformin monotherapy (≥1,500 mg/day for ≥8 weeks), entered a 2-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period and were randomized to glimepiride, STEGLATRO 5 mg, or STEGLATRO 15 mg administered once daily in addition to continuation of background metformin therapy. Glimepiride was initiated at 1 mg/day and titrated up to a maximum dose of 6 or 8 mg/day (depending on maximum approved dose in each country) or a maximum tolerated dose or down-titrated to avoid or manage hypoglycemia. The mean daily dose of glimepiride was 3.0 mg.
STEGLATRO 15 mg was non-inferior to glimepiride after 52 weeks of treatment. (See Table 6.)
Table 6: Results at Week 52 from an Active-Controlled Study Comparing STEGLATRO to Glimepiride as Add-on Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled on Metformin*.
|
Glimepiride |
STEGLATRO 5 mg |
STEGLATRO 15 mg |
| HbA1c (%) |
N = 437 |
N = 447 |
N = 440 |
| Baseline (mean) |
7.8 |
7.8 |
7.8 |
| Change from baseline (LS mean†) |
-0.6 |
-0.5 |
-0.5 |
| Difference from glimepiride (LS mean†, 95% CI) |
|
0.2‡
(0.0, 0.3) |
0.1‡
(-0.0, 0.2) |
| Patients [N (%)] with HbA1c <7% |
208 (47.7) |
177 (39.5) |
186 (42.2) |
* N includes all randomized and treated patients with a baseline measurement of the outcome variable. At Week 52, the primary HbA1c endpoint was missing for 15%, 20%, and 16% of patients and during the trial, rescue medication was initiated by 3%, 6%, and 4% of patients randomized to glimepiride, STEGLATRO 5 mg, and STEGLATRO 15 mg, respectively. Missing Week 52 measurements were imputed using multiple imputation with a mean equal to the baseline value of the patient. Results include measurements collected after initiation of rescue medication. For those patients who did not receive rescue medication and had values measured at 52 weeks, the mean changes from baseline for HbA1c were -0.8%, -0.6%, and -0.7% for glimepiride, STEGLATRO 5 mg, and STEGLATRO 15 mg, respectively.
† Intent-to-treat analysis using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline value, prior antihyperglycemic medication and baseline eGFR.
‡ Non-inferiority is declared when the upper bound of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the mean difference is less than 0.3%. |
The mean baseline body weight was 86.8 kg, 87.9 kg, and 85.6 kg in the glimepiride, STEGLATRO 5 mg, and STEGLATRO 15 mg groups, respectively. The mean changes from baseline to Week 52 were 0.6 kg, -2.6 kg, and -3.0 kg in the glimepiride, STEGLATRO 5 mg, and STEGLATRO 15 mg groups, respectively. The difference from glimepiride (95% CI) for STEGLATRO 5 mg was -3.2 kg (-3.7, -2.7) and for STEGLATRO 15 mg was -3.6 kg (-4.1, -3.1).
In Combination with Sitagliptin versus STEGLATRO Alone and Sitagliptin Alone, as Add-on to Metformin
A total of 1,233 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequate glycemic control (HbA1c between 7.5% and 11%) on metformin monotherapy (≥1,500 mg/day for ≥8 weeks) participated in a randomized, double-blind, 26-week, active controlled study (NCT02099110) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of STEGLATRO 5 mg or 15 mg in combination with sitagliptin 100 mg compared to the individual components. Patients were randomized to one of five treatment arms: STEGLATRO 5 mg, STEGLATRO 15 mg, sitagliptin 100 mg, STEGLATRO 5 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg, or STEGLATRO 15 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg.
At Week 26, STEGLATRO 5 mg or 15 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg provided statistically significantly greater reductions in HbA1c compared to STEGLATRO (5 mg or 15 mg) alone or sitagliptin 100 mg alone. The mean change from baseline in HbA1c was -1.4% for STEGLATRO 5 mg or 15 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg versus -1.0%, for STEGLATRO 5 mg, STEGLATRO 15 mg, or sitagliptin 100 mg, respectively. More patients receiving STEGLATRO 5 mg or 15 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg achieved an HbA1c <7% (53.3% and 50.9%, for STEGLATRO 5 mg or 15 mg, respectively, + sitagliptin 100 mg) compared to the individual components (29.3%, 33.7%, and 38.5% for STEGLATRO 5 mg, STEGLATRO 15 mg, or sitagliptin 100 mg, respectively).
Add-on Combination Therapy with Metformin and Sitagliptin
A total of 463 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled (HbA1c between 7% and 10.5%) on metformin (≥1,500 mg/day for ≥8 weeks) and sitagliptin 100 mg once daily participated in a randomized, double-blind, multi-center, 26-week, placebo-controlled study (NCT02036515) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of STEGLATRO. Patients entered a 2-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period and were randomized to placebo, STEGLATRO 5 mg, or STEGLATRO 15 mg.
At Week 26, treatment with STEGLATRO at 5 mg or 15 mg daily provided statistically significant reductions in HbA1c. STEGLATRO also resulted in a higher proportion of patients achieving an HbA1c <7% compared to placebo (see Table 7).
Table 7: Results at Week 26 from an Add-on Study of STEGLATRO in Combination with Metformin and Sitagliptin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus*.
|
Placebo |
STEGLATRO 5 mg |
STEGLATRO 15 mg |
| HbA1c (%) |
N = 152 |
N = 155 |
N = 152 |
| Baseline (mean) |
8.0 |
8.1 |
8.0 |
| Change from baseline (LS mean†) |
-0.2 |
-0.7 |
-0.8 |
| Difference from placebo (LS mean†, 95% CI) |
|
-0.5‡
(-0.7, -0.3) |
-0.6‡
(-0.8, -0.4) |
| Patients [N (%)] with HbA1c <7% |
31 (20.2) |
54 (34.6) |
64 (42.3) |
| FPG (mg/dL) |
N = 152 |
N = 156 |
N = 152 |
| Baseline (mean) |
169.6 |
167.7 |
171.7 |
| Change from baseline (LS mean†) |
-6.5 |
-25.7 |
-32.1 |
| Difference from placebo (LS mean†, 95% CI) |
|
-19.2‡
(-26.8, -11.6) |
-25.6‡
(-33.2, -18.0) |
* N includes all randomized and treated patients with a baseline measurement of the outcome variable. At Week 26, the primary HbA1c endpoint was missing for 10%, 11%, and 7% of patients and during the trial, rescue medication was initiated by 16%, 1%, and 2% of patients randomized to placebo, STEGLATRO 5 mg, and STEGLATRO 15 mg, respectively. Missing Week 26 measurements were imputed using multiple imputation with a mean equal to the baseline value of the patient. Results include measurements collected after initiation of rescue medication. For those patients who did not receive rescue medication and had values measured at 26 weeks, the mean changes from baseline for HbA1c were -0.2%, -0.8%, and -0.9% for placebo, STEGLATRO 5 mg, and STEGLATRO 15 mg, respectively.
† Intent-to-treat analysis using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline value, prior antihyperglycemic medication and baseline eGFR.
‡ p<0.001 compared to placebo. |
The mean baseline body weight was 86.5 kg, 87.6 kg, and 86.6 kg in the placebo, STEGLATRO 5 mg, and STEGLATRO 15 mg groups, respectively. The mean changes from baseline to Week 26 were -1.0 kg, -3.0 kg, and -2.8 kg in the placebo, STEGLATRO 5 mg, and STEGLATRO 15 mg groups, respectively. The difference from placebo (95% CI) for STEGLATRO 5 mg was -1.9 kg (-2.6, -1.3) and for STEGLATRO 15 mg was -1.8 kg (-2.4, -1.2).
The mean baseline systolic blood pressure was 130.2 mmHg, 132.1 mmHg, and 131.6 mmHg in the placebo, STEGLATRO 5 mg, and STEGLATRO 15 mg groups, respectively. The mean changes from baseline to Week 26 were -0.2 mmHg, -3.8 mmHg, and -4.5 mmHg in the placebo, STEGLATRO 5 mg, and STEGLATRO 15 mg groups, respectively. The difference from placebo (95% CI) for STEGLATRO 5 mg was -3.7 mmHg (-6.1, -1.2) and for STEGLATRO 15 mg was -4.3 mmHg (-6.7, -1.9).
Initial Combination Therapy with Sitagliptin
A total of 291 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled (HbA1c between 8% and 10.5%) on diet and exercise participated in a randomized, double-blind, multi-center, placebo-controlled 26-week study (NCT02226003) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of STEGLATRO in combination with sitagliptin. These patients, who were not receiving any background antihyperglycemic treatment for ≥8 weeks, entered a 2-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period and were randomized to placebo, STEGLATRO 5 mg or STEGLATRO 15 mg in combination with sitagliptin (100 mg) once daily.
At Week 26, treatment with STEGLATRO 5 mg and 15 mg in combination with sitagliptin at 100 mg daily provided statistically significant reductions in HbA1c compared to placebo. STEGLATRO 5 mg and 15 mg in combination with sitagliptin at 100 mg daily also resulted in a higher proportion of patients achieving an HbA1c <7% and greater reductions in FPG compared with placebo.
Add-on Combination Therapy with Insulin (with or without Metformin)
In an 18-week randomized, double-blind, multi-center, placebo-controlled, glycemic sub-study of VERTIS CV (eValuation of ERTugliflozin efficacy and Safety CardioVascular, NCT01986881, study details see), a total of 1065 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with inadequate glycemic control (HbA1c between 7% and 10.5%) on background therapy of insulin ≥20 units/day (59% also on metformin ≥1,500 mg/day) were randomized to placebo, STEGLATRO 5 mg or STEGLATRO 15 mg once daily treatment.
At Week 18, treatment with STEGLATRO at 5 mg or 15 mg daily provided statistically significant reductions in HbA1c compared to placebo (see Table 8).
Table 8: Results at Week 18 from an Add-on Study of STEGLATRO in Combination with Insulin (with or without Metformin) in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus*.
|
Placebo |
STEGLATRO 5 mg |
STEGLATRO 15 mg |
| HbA1c (%) |
N = 346 |
N = 346 |
N = 367 |
| Baseline (mean) |
8.4 |
8.4 |
8.4 |
| Change from baseline (LS mean†, SE) |
-0.2 (0.05) |
-0.7 (0.05) |
-0.7 (0.05) |
| Difference from placebo (LS mean†, 95% CI) |
|
-0.5‡
(-0.6, -0.4) |
-0.5‡
(-0.7, -0.4) |
| Patients [N (%)] with HbA1c <7%§ |
37 (10.7) |
79 (22.8) |
81 (22.1) |
| FPG (mg/dL) |
N = 343 |
N = 346 |
N = 368 |
| Baseline (mean) |
167.4 |
173.8 |
175.4 |
| Change from baseline (LS mean†, SE) |
-6.3 (2.91) |
-25.6 (2.90) |
-29.8 (2.86) |
| Difference from placebo (LS mean†, 95% CI) |
|
-19.2‡
(-26.8, -11.6) |
-23.4‡
(-30.9, -16.0) |
* N includes all randomized and treated patients with a baseline measurement of the outcome variable. At Week 18, the primary HbA1c endpoint was missing for 10%, 9%, and 12% of patients and during the trial, rescue medication was initiated by 12%, 7%, and 6% of patients randomized to placebo, STEGLATRO 5 mg, and STEGLATRO 15 mg, respectively. Results include measurements collected after initiation of rescue medication. Prior to Week 18, background antidiabetic medication was held stable. Missing Week 18 measurements were imputed using multiple imputation with a mean equal to the baseline value of the patient (Return to Baseline analysis).
† Intent-to-treat analysis using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline value, insulin stratum, and baseline eGFR.
‡ p<0.001 compared to placebo.
§ Missing values imputed as not meeting the <7% criterion.
SE: standard error. |
The mean baseline body weights were 93.3 kg, 93.8 kg, and 92.1 kg in the placebo, STEGLATRO 5 mg, and STEGLATRO 15 mg groups, respectively. The mean changes from baseline to Week 18 were - 0.2 kg, -1.6 kg, and -1.9 kg in the placebo, STEGLATRO 5 mg, and STEGLATRO 15 mg groups, respectively. The differences from placebo (95% CI) for STEGLATRO 5 mg were - 1.4 kg (- 1.9, - 0.9) and for STEGLATRO 15 mg was -1.6 kg (-2.1, -1.1).
The mean baseline systolic blood pressures were 134.0 mmHg, 135.6 mmHg, and 133.7 mmHg in the placebo, STEGLATRO 5 mg, and STEGLATRO 15 mg groups, respectively. The mean changes from baseline to Week 18 were 0.7 mmHg, -2.2 mmHg, and -1.7 mmHg in the placebo, STEGLATRO 5 mg, and STEGLATRO 15 mg groups, respectively. The differences from placebo (95% CI) for STEGLATRO 5 mg was – 2.9 mmHg (-4.9, -1.0) and for STEGLATRO 15 mg were -2.5 mmHg (- 4.4, - 0.5).
Add-on Combination Therapy with Metformin and Sulfonylurea
In an 18-week randomized, double-blind, multi-center, placebo-controlled, glycemic sub-study of VERTIS CV (NCT01986881, study details see), a total of 330 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with inadequate glycemic control (HbA1c between 7% and 10.5%) with background therapy of metformin ≥1,500 mg/day and a sulfonylurea (SU) were randomized to placebo, STEGLATRO 5 mg or STEGLATRO 15 mg once daily treatment.
At Week 18, treatment with STEGLATRO at 5 mg or 15 mg daily provided statistically significant reductions in HbA1c compared to placebo (see Table 9).
Table 9: Results at Week 18 from an Add-on Study of STEGLATRO in Combination with Metformin and a SU in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus*.
|
Placebo |
STEGLATRO 5 mg |
STEGLATRO 15 mg |
| HbA1c (%) |
N = 116 |
N = 99 |
N = 113 |
| Baseline (mean) |
8.3 |
8.4 |
8.3 |
| Change from baseline (LS mean†, SE) |
-0.3 (0.08) |
-0.8 (0.09) |
-0.9 (0.08) |
| Difference from placebo (LS mean†, 95% CI) |
|
-0.6‡
(-0.8, -0.3) |
-0.7‡
(-0.9, -0.4) |
| Patients [N (%)] with HbA1c <7%§ |
17 (14.7) |
39 (39.4) |
38 (33.6) |
| FPG (mg/dL) |
N = 117 |
N = 99 |
N = 113 |
| Baseline (mean) |
177.3 |
183.5 |
174.0 |
| Change from baseline (LS mean†, SE) |
-3.5 (3.65) |
-31.3 (3.87) |
-33.0 (3.67) |
| Difference from placebo (LS mean†, 95% CI) |
|
-27.9‡
(-37.8, -17.9) |
-29.5‡
(-39.0, -19.9) |
* N includes all randomized and treated patients with a baseline measurement of the outcome variable. At Week 18, the primary HbA1c endpoint was missing for 9%, 8%, and 6% of patients and during the trial, rescue medication was initiated by 10%, 7%, and 3% of patients randomized to placebo, STEGLATRO 5 mg, and STEGLATRO 15 mg, respectively. Results include measurements collected after initiation of rescue medication. Missing Week 18 measurements were imputed using multiple imputation with a mean equal to the baseline value of the patient (Return to Baseline analysis).
† Intent-to-treat analysis using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline value and baseline eGFR.
‡ p<0.001 compared to placebo.
§ Missing values imputed as not meeting the <7% criterion.
SE: standard error |
The mean baseline body weights were 90.5 kg, 92.1 kg, and 92.9 kg in the placebo, STEGLATRO 5 mg, and STEGLATRO 15 mg groups, respectively. The mean changes from baseline to Week 18 were - 0.6 kg, -2.0 kg, and - 2.2 kg in the placebo, STEGLATRO 5 mg, and STEGLATRO 15 mg groups, respectively. The differences from placebo (95% CI) for STEGLATRO 5 mg were - 1.4 kg (- 2.2, - 0.7) and for STEGLATRO 15 mg was - 1.6 kg (- 2.3, - 0.9).
Use In Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus And Moderate Renal Impairment
26-Week Placebo-Controlled Study
The efficacy of STEGLATRO was assessed in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled study (NCT01986855) of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and moderate renal impairment (468 patients with eGFR ≥30 to <60 mL/min/1.73 m2). In this study, 202 patients exposed to STEGLATRO (5 mg or 15 mg) had an eGFR between 45 and 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 111 patients exposed to STEGLATRO (5 mg or 15 mg) had an eGFR between 30 and 45 mL/min/1.73 m2. The mean duration of diabetes for the study population was approximately 14 years, and the majority of patients were receiving background insulin (55.9%) and/or sulfonylurea (40.3%) therapy. Approximately 50% had a history of cardiovascular disease or heart failure.
STEGLATRO did not show efficacy in this study. The HbA1c reductions from baseline to Week 26 were not significantly different between placebo and STEGLATRO 5 mg or 15 mg [see Use In Specific Populations].
Cardiovascular Outcomes In Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus And Established Cardiovascular Disease
The effect of STEGLATRO on cardiovascular risk in adult patients with type 2 diabetes and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease was evaluated in the VERTIS CV study (NCT01986881), a multicenter, multi-national, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, event-driven trial. The study compared the risk of experiencing a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) between STEGLATRO and placebo when these were added to and used concomitantly with standard of care treatments for diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
A total of 8246 patients were randomized (placebo N=2747, STEGLATRO 5 mg N=2752, STEGLATRO 15 mg N=2747) and followed for a median of 3 years. Approximately 88% of the study population was Caucasian, 6% Asian, and 3% Black. The mean age was 64 years and approximately 70% were male.
All patients in the study had inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus at baseline (HbA1c greater than or equal to 7%). The mean duration of type 2 diabetes mellitus was 13 years, the mean HbA1c at baseline was 8.2% and the mean eGFR was 76 mL/min/1.73 m2. At baseline, patients were treated with one (32%) or more (67%) antidiabetic medications including biguanides (metformin) (76%), insulin (47%), sulfonylureas (41%) DPP-4 inhibitors (11%) and GLP-1 receptor agonists (3%).
Almost all patients (99%) had established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease at baseline including: a documented history of coronary artery disease (76%), cerebrovascular disease (23%) or peripheral artery disease (19%). Approximately 24% patients had a history of heart failure (HF). At baseline, the mean systolic blood pressure was 133 mmHg, the mean diastolic blood pressure was 77 mmHg, the mean LDL was 89 mg/dL, and the mean HDL was 44 mg/dL. At baseline, approximately 81% of patients were treated with renin angiotensin system inhibitors, 69% with beta-blockers, 43% with diuretics, 82% with statins, 4% with ezetimibe, and 89% with antiplatelet agents.
The primary endpoint in VERTIS CV was the time to first occurrence of MACE. A major adverse cardiovascular event was defined as occurrence of either a cardiovascular death or a nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) or a nonfatal stroke. The statistical analysis plan pre-specified that the 5 and 15 mg doses would be combined for the analysis. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to test for non-inferiority against the pre-specified risk margin of 1.3 for the hazard ratio of MACE. Type-1 error was controlled across multiple tests using a hierarchical testing strategy.
The incidence rate of MACE was similar between the STEGLATRO-treated and placebo-treated patients. The estimated hazard ratio of MACE associated with STEGLATRO relative to placebo was 0.97 with 95.6% confidence interval (0.85, 1.11). The upper bound of this confidence interval excluded a risk larger than 1.3 (Table 10). Results for the individual 5 mg and 15 mg doses were consistent with results for the combined dose group.
Table 10: Analysis of MACE and its Components from the VERTIS-CV Study*.
| Endpoint† |
Placebo
(N=2747) |
STEGLATRO
(N=5499) |
Hazard Ratio vs Placebo
(CI) ‡ |
| N (%) |
Event Rate
(per 100 person-years) |
N (%) |
Event Rate
(per 100 person-years) |
| MACE (CV death, non-fatal MI, or non-fatal stroke) Composite |
327 (11.9) |
4.0 |
653 (11.9) |
3.9 |
0.97
(0.85, 1.11) |
| Components of Composite Endpoint |
| Non-fatal MI |
148 (5.4) |
1.6 |
310 (5.6) |
1.7 |
1.04
(0.86, 1.27) |
| Non-fatal Stroke |
78 (2.8) |
0.8 |
157 (2.9) |
0.8 |
1.00
(0.76, 1.32) |
| CV death |
184 (6.7) |
1.9 |
341 (6.2) |
1.8 |
0.92
(0.77, 1.11) |
N=Number of patients, CI=Confidence interval, CV=Cardiovascular, MI=Myocardial infarction.
* Intent-to-treat analysis set.
† MACE was evaluated in subjects who took at least one dose of study medication and, for subjects who discontinued study medication prior to the end of the study, censored events that occurred more than 365 days after the last dose of study medication. Other endpoints were evaluated using all randomized subjects and events that occurred any time after the first dose of study medication until the last contact date. The total number of first events was analyzed for each endpoint.
‡ HR and CI are based on Cox proportional hazards regression model, stratified by cohorts. For MACE a 95.6% CI is presented, for other endpoints a 95% CI is presented. |