CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism Of Action
Dasatinib, at nanomolar concentrations, inhibits the
following kinases: BCR-ABL, SRC family (SRC, LCK, YES, FYN), c-KIT, EPHA2, and
PDGFRβ. Based on modeling studies, dasatinib is predicted to bind to
multiple conformations of the ABL kinase.
In vitro, dasatinib was active in leukemic cell lines
representing variants of imatinib mesylate-sensitive and resistant disease.
Dasatinib inhibited the growth of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and acute
lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cell lines overexpressing BCR-ABL. Under the
conditions of the assays, dasatinib could overcome imatinib resistance
resulting from BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations, activation of alternate
signaling pathways involving the SRC family kinases (LYN, HCK), and multi-drug
resistance gene overexpression.
Pharmacodynamics
Cardiac Electrophysiology
Of 2440 patients treated with SPRYCEL at all doses tested
in clinical trials, 16 patients (<1%) had QTc prolongation reported as an
adverse reaction. Twenty-two patients (1%) experienced a QTcF > 500 ms. In
865 patients with leukemia treated with SPRYCEL 70 mg BID in five Phase 2
studies, the maximum mean changes in QTcF (90% upper bound CI) from baseline
ranged from 7 ms to 13.4 ms.
An analysis of the data from five Phase 2 studies in
patients (70 mg BID) and a Phase 1 study in healthy subjects (100 mg single
dose) suggests that there is a maximum increase of 3 to 6 milliseconds in
Fridericia corrected QTc interval from baseline for subjects receiving
therapeutic doses of dasatinib, with associated upper 95% confidence intervals
<10 msec.
Pharmacokinetics
The pharmacokinetics of dasatinib exhibits dose
proportional increases in AUC and linear elimination characteristics over the
dose range of 15 mg/day (0.15 times the lowest approved recommended dose) to
240 mg/day (1.7 times the highest approved recommended dose).
At 100 mg QD, the maximum concentration at steady state
(Cmax) is 82.2 ng/mL (CV% 69%), area under the plasma drug concentration time
curve (AUC) is 397 ng/mL*hr (CV% 55%). The clearance of dasatinib is found to
be time-invariant.
Absorption
The maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) of dasatinib are
observed between 0.5 hours and 6 hours (Tmax) following oral administration.
Food Effect
A high-fat meal increased the mean AUC of dasatinib
following a single dose of 100 mg by 14%. The total calorie content of the
high-fat meal was 985 kcal. The calories derived from fat, carbohydrates, and
protein were 52%, 34%, and 14% for the high-fat meal.
Distribution
The apparent volume of distribution is 2505 L (CV% 93%).
Binding of dasatinib to human plasma proteins in vitro
was approximately 96% and of its active metabolite was 93%, with no
concentration dependence over the range of 100 ng/mL to 500 ng/mL.
Dasatinib is a P-gp substrate in vitro.
Elimination
The mean terminal half-life of dasatinib is 3 hours to 5
hours. The mean apparent oral clearance is 363.8 L/hr (CV% 81.3%).
Metabolism
Dasatinib is metabolized in humans, primarily by CYP3A4.
CYP3A4 is the primary enzyme responsible for the formation of the active
metabolite. Flavin-containing monooxygenase 3 (FMO-3) and uridine
diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) enzymes are also involved in the
formation of dasatinib metabolites.
The exposure of the active metabolite, which is
equipotent to dasatinib, represents approximately 5% of the AUC of dasatinib.
The active metabolite of dasatinib is unlikely to play a major role in the
observed pharmacology of the drug. Dasatinib also has several other inactive
oxidative metabolites.
Excretion
Elimination is primarily via the feces. Following a
single radiolabeled dose of oral dasatinib, 4% of the administered
radioactivity was recovered in the urine and 85% in the feces within 10 days.
Unchanged dasatinib accounted for 0.1% of the administered dose in the urine
and 19% of the administered dose in the feces with the remainder of the dose
being metabolites.
Specific Populations
Age (15 to 86 years old), sex, and renal impairment
(creatinine clearance 21.6 mL/min to 342.3 mL/min as estimated by Cockcroft
Gault) have no clinically relevant effect on the pharmacokinetics of dasatinib.
Pediatric Patients
The pharmacokinetics of dasatinib were evaluated in 43
pediatric patients with leukemia or solid tumors at oral doses ranging from 60
mg/m² to 120 mg/m² once daily, taken with or without food. The pharmacokinetics
showed dose proportionality with a dose-related increase in exposure. The mean
Tmax was observed between 0.5 hours and 6 hours and the mean half-life was 2
hours to 5 hours. The geometric mean (CV%) of body weight normalized clearance
in these 43 pediatric patients is 5.98 (41.5%) L/h/kg. In pediatric patients
with a dosing regimen of 60 mg/m², the model simulated geometric mean (CV%)
steady-state plasma average concentrations of dasatinib were 14.7 (64.6%) ng/mL
(for 2 to <6 years old), 16.3 (97.5%) ng/mL (for 6 to <12 years old), and
18.2 (67.7%) ng/mL (for 12 years and older) [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION].
Dasatinib clearance and volume of distribution change with body weight in
pediatric patients. Dasatinib has not been studied in patients < 1 year old.
Patients With Hepatic Impairment
Compared to subjects with normal liver function, patients
with moderate hepatic impairment (Child Pugh B) had decreases in mean Cmax by
47% and mean AUC by 8%. Patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child Pugh C)
had decreases in mean Cmax by 43% and in mean AUC by 28% compared to the
subjects with normal liver function.
Drug Interaction Studies
Cytochrome P450 Enzymes
The coadministration of ketoconazole (strong CYP3A4
inhibitor) twice daily increased the mean Cmax of dasatinib by 4-fold and the
mean AUC of dasatinib by 5-fold following a single oral dose of 20 mg.
The coadministration of rifampin (strong CYP3A4 inducer)
once daily decreased the mean Cmax of dasatinib by 81% and the mean AUC of
dasatinib by 82%.
Dasatinib is a time-dependent inhibitor of CYP3A4.
Dasatinib does not inhibit CYP1A2, 2A6, 2B6, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, or 2E1.
Dasatinib does not induce CYP enzymes.
Gastric Acid Reducing Agents
The administration of 30 mL of aluminum
hydroxide/magnesium hydroxide 2 hours prior to a single dose of SPRYCEL was
associated with no relevant change in the mean AUC of dasatinib; however, the
mean Cmax of dasatinib was increased by 26%.
The simultaneous administration of 30 mL of aluminum
hydroxide/magnesium hydroxide with a single dose of SPRYCEL was associated with
a 55% reduction in the mean AUC of dasatinib and a 58% reduction in the mean Cmax
of dasatinib.
The administration of a single dose of SPRYCEL 10 hours
following famotidine (H2 antagonist) reduced the mean AUC of dasatinib by 61%
and the mean Cmax of dasatinib by 63%.
The administration of a single 100 mg dose of SPRYCEL 22
hours following a 40 mg dose of omeprazole (proton pump inhibitor) at steady
state reduced the mean AUC of dasatinib by 43% and the mean Cmax of dasatinib
by 42%.
Transporters
Dasatinib is a not an inhibitor of P-gp in vitro.
Clinical Studies
Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase CML In Adults
DASISION (Dasatinib vs Imatinib Study in Treatment-Naive
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients) (NCT00481247) was an open-label,
multicenter, international, randomized trial conducted in adult patients with
newly diagnosed chronic phase CML. A total of 519 patients were randomized to
receive either SPRYCEL 100 mg once daily or imatinib 400 mg once daily.
Patients with a history of cardiac disease were included in this trial except
those who had a myocardial infarction within 6 months, congestive heart failure
within 3 months, significant arrhythmias, or QTc prolongation. The primary
endpoint was the rate of confirmed complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) within
12 months. Confirmed CCyR was defined as a CCyR noted on two consecutive
occasions (at least 28 days apart).
Median age was 46 years in the SPRYCEL group and 49 years
in the imatinib groups, with 10% and 11% of patients ≥65 years of age,
respectively. There were slightly more male than female patients in both groups
(59% vs 41%). Fifty-three percent of all patients were Caucasian and 39% were
Asian. At baseline, the distribution of Hasford scores was similar in the
SPRYCEL and imatinib treatment groups (low risk: 33% and 34%; intermediate
risk: 48% and 47%; high risk: 19% and 19%, respectively). With a minimum of 12
months follow-up, 85% of patients randomized to SPRYCEL and 81% of patients
randomized to imatinib were still on study.
With a minimum of 24 months follow-up, 77% of patients
randomized to SPRYCEL and 75% of patients randomized to imatinib were still on
study and with a minimum of 60 months follow-up, 61% and 62% of patients,
respectively, were still on treatment at the time of study closure.
Efficacy results are summarized in Table 13.
Table 13: Efficacy Results in a Randomized Newly Diagnosed
Chronic Phase CML Trial
|
SPRYCEL
(n=259) |
Imatinib
(n=260) |
Confirmed CCyRa |
Within 12 months (95% CI) |
76.8% (71.2-81.8) |
66.2% (60.1-71.9) |
P-value |
0.007* |
|
Major Molecular Responseb |
12 months (95% CI) |
52.1% (45.9-58.3) |
33.8% (28.1-39.9) |
P-value |
<0.0001 |
|
60 months (95% CI) |
76.4% (70.8-81.5) |
64.2% (58.1-70.1) |
a Confirmed CCyR is defined as a CCyR noted on
two consecutive occasions at least 28 days apart.
b Major molecular response (at any time) was defined as BCR-ABL
ratios ≤0.1% by RQ-PCR in peripheral blood samples standardized on the
International scale. These are cumulative rates representing minimum follow up
for the time frame specified.
* Adjusted for Hasford score and indicated statistical significance at a
pre-defined nominal level of significance.
CI = confidence interval. |
The confirmed CCyR within 24, 36, and 60 months for
SPRYCEL versus imatinib arms were 80% versus 74%, 83% versus 77%, and 83%
versus 79%, respectively. The MMR at 24 and 36 months for SPRYCEL versus
imatinib arms were 65% versus 50% and 69% versus 56%, respectively.
After 60 months follow-up, median time to confirmed CCyR
was 3.1 months in 215 SPRYCEL responders and 5.8 months in 204 imatinib
responders. Median time to MMR after 60 months follow-up was 9.3 months in 198
SPRYCEL responders and 15.0 months in 167 imatinib responders.
At 60 months, 8 patients (3%) on the dasatinib arm
progressed to either accelerated phase or blast crisis while 15 patients (6%)
on the imatinib arm progressed to either accelerated phase or blast crisis.
The estimated 60-month survival rates for SPRYCEL- and
imatinib-treated patients were 90.9% (CI: 86.6%–93.8%) and 89.6% (CI:
85.2%–92.8%), respectively. Based on data 5 years after the last patient was
enrolled in the trial, 83% and 77% of patients were known to be alive in the
dasatinib and imatinib treatment groups, respectively, 10% were known to have
died in both treatment groups, and 7% and 13% had unknown survival status in
the dasatinib and imatinib treatment groups, respectively.
At 60 months follow-up in the SPRYCEL arm, the rate of
MMR at any time in each risk group determined by Hasford score was 90% (low
risk), 71% (intermediate risk) and 67% (high risk). In the imatinib arm, the
rate of MMR at any time in each risk group determined by Hasford score was 69%
(low risk), 65% (intermediate risk), and 54% (high risk).
BCR-ABL sequencing was performed on blood samples from
patients in the newly diagnosed trial who discontinued dasatinib or imatinib
therapy. Among dasatinib-treated patients the mutations detected were T315I,
F317I/L, and V299L.
Dasatinib does not appear to be active against the T315I
mutation, based on in vitro data.
Imatinib-Resistant Or -Intolerant CML Or Ph+ ALL In Adults
The efficacy and safety of SPRYCEL were investigated in
adult patients with CML or Ph+ ALL whose disease was resistant to or who were
intolerant to imatinib: 1158 patients had chronic phase CML, 858 patients had
accelerated phase, myeloid blast phase, or lymphoid blast phase CML, and 130
patients had Ph+ ALL. In a clinical trial in chronic phase CML, resistance to
imatinib was defined as failure to achieve a complete hematologic response
(CHR; after 3 months), major cytogenetic response (MCyR; after 6 months), or
complete cytogenetic response (CCyR; after 12 months); or loss of a previous
molecular response (with concurrent ≥10% increase in Ph+ metaphases),
cytogenetic response, or hematologic response. Imatinib intolerance was defined
as inability to tolerate 400 mg or more of imatinib per day or discontinuation
of imatinib because of toxicity.
Results described below are based on a minimum of 2 years
follow-up after the start of SPRYCEL therapy in patients with a median time
from initial diagnosis of approximately 5 years. Across all studies, 48% of
patients were women, 81% were white, 15% were black or Asian, 25% were 65 years
of age or older, and 5% were 75 years of age or older. Most patients had long
disease histories with extensive prior treatment, including imatinib, cytotoxic
chemotherapy, interferon, and stem cell transplant. Overall, 80% of patients
had imatinib-resistant disease and 20% of patients were intolerant to imatinib.
The maximum imatinib dose had been 400–600 mg/day in about 60% of the patients
and >600 mg/day in 40% of the patients.
The primary efficacy endpoint in chronic phase CML was
MCyR, defined as elimination (CCyR) or substantial diminution (by at least 65%,
partial cytogenetic response) of Ph+ hematopoietic cells. The primary efficacy
endpoint in accelerated phase, myeloid blast phase, lymphoid blast phase CML,
and Ph+ ALL was major hematologic response (MaHR), defined as either a CHR or
no evidence of leukemia (NEL).
Chronic Phase CML
Dose-Optimization Trial
A randomized, open-label trial (NCT00123474) was
conducted in adult patients with chronic phase CML to evaluate the efficacy and
safety of SPRYCEL administered once daily compared with SPRYCEL administered
twice daily. Patients with significant cardiac diseases, including myocardial
infarction within 6 months, congestive heart failure within 3 months,
significant arrhythmias, or QTc prolongation were excluded from the trial. The
primary efficacy endpoint was MCyR in patients with imatinib-resistant CML. A
total of 670 patients, of whom 497 had imatinib-resistant disease, were
randomized to the SPRYCEL 100 mg once-daily, 140 mg once-daily, 50 mg
twice-daily, or 70 mg twice-daily group. Median duration of treatment was 22
months.
Efficacy was achieved across all SPRYCEL treatment groups
with the once-daily schedule demonstrating comparable efficacy
(non-inferiority) to the twice-daily schedule on the primary efficacy endpoint
(difference in MCyR 1.9%; 95% CI [-6.8%–10.6%]); however, the 100-mg
once-daily regimen demonstrated improved safety and tolerability.
Efficacy results are presented in Tables 14 and 15 for
adult patients with chronic phase CML who received the recommended starting
dose of 100 mg once daily.
Table 14: Efficacy of SPRYCEL in Adult Patients with
Imatinib-Resistant or -Intolerant Chronic Phase CML (minimum of 24 months
follow-up)
All Patients |
100 mg Once Daily
(n=167) |
Hematologic Response Rate % (95% CI) |
CHRa |
92% (86-95) |
Cytogenetic Response Rate % (95% CI) |
MCyRb |
63% (56-71) |
CCyR |
50% (42-58) |
a CHR (response confirmed after 4 weeks): WBC
≤ institutional ULN, platelets <450,000/mm³, no blasts or
promyelocytes in peripheral blood, <5% myelocytes plus metamyelocytes in
peripheral blood, basophils in peripheral blood <20%, and no extramedullary
involvement.
b MCyR combines both complete (0% Ph+ metaphases) and partial
(>0%–35%) responses. |
Table 15: Long-Term MMR of SPRYCEL in the Dose
Optimization Trial: Adult Patients with Imatinib-Resistant or -Intolerant
Chronic Phase CMLa
|
Minimum Follow-up Period |
2 Years |
5 Years |
7 Years |
Major Molecular Responseb % (n/N) |
All Patients Randomized |
34% (57/167) |
43% (71/167) |
44% (73/167) |
Imatinib-Resistant Patients |
33% (41/124) |
40% (50/124) |
41% (51/124) |
Imatinib-Intolerant Patients |
37% (16/43) |
49% (21/43) |
51% (22/43) |
a Results reported in recommended starting
dose of 100 mg once daily.
b Major molecular response criteria: Defined as BCR-ABL/control
transcripts ≤0.1% by RQ-PCR in peripheral blood samples. |
Based on data 7 years after the last patient was enrolled
in the trial, 44% were known to be alive, 31% were known to have died, and 25%
had an unknown survival status.
By 7 years, transformation to either accelerated or blast
phase occurred in nine patients on treatment in the 100 mg once-daily treatment
group.
Advanced Phase CML And Ph+ ALL
Dose-Optimization Trial
One randomized open-label trial (NCT00123487) was
conducted in patients with advanced phase CML (accelerated phase CML, myeloid
blast phase CML, or lymphoid blast phase CML) to evaluate the efficacy and
safety of SPRYCEL administered once daily compared with SPRYCEL administered
twice daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was MaHR. A total of 611 patients
were randomized to either the SPRYCEL 140 mg once-daily or 70 mg twice-daily
group. Median duration of treatment was approximately 6 months for both
treatment groups. The once-daily schedule demonstrated comparable efficacy
(non-inferiority) to the twice-daily schedule on the primary efficacy endpoint;
however, the 140-mg once-daily regimen demonstrated improved safety and
tolerability.
Response rates for patients in the 140 mg once-daily
group are presented in Table 16.
Table 16: Efficacy of SPRYCEL in Imatinib-Resistant or
-Intolerant Advanced Phase CML and Ph+ ALL (2-Year Results)
|
140 mg Once Daily |
Accelerated
(n=158) |
Myeloid Blast
(n=75) |
Lymphoid Blast
(n=33) |
Ph+ ALL
(n=40) |
MaHRa |
66% |
28% |
42% |
38% |
(95% CI) |
(59-74) |
(18-40) |
(26-61) |
(23-54) |
CHRa |
47% |
17% |
21% |
33% |
(95% CI) |
(40-56) |
(10-28) |
(9-39) |
(19-49) |
NELa |
19% |
11% |
21% |
5% |
(95% CI) |
(13-26) |
(5-20) |
(9-39) |
(1-17) |
MCyRb |
39% |
28% |
52% |
70% |
(95% CI) |
(31-47) |
(18-40) |
(34-69) |
(54-83) |
CCyR |
32% |
17% |
39% |
50% |
(95% CI) |
(25-40) |
(10-28) |
(23-58) |
(34-66) |
a Hematologic response criteria (all responses
confirmed after 4 weeks): Major hematologic response: (MaHR) = complete
hematologic response (CHR) + no evidence of leukemia (NEL). CHR: WBC ≤
institutional ULN, ANC ≥1000/mm³, platelets ≥100,000/mm³, no blasts
or promyelocytes in peripheral blood, bone marrow blasts ≤5%, <5%
myelocytes plus metamyelocytes in peripheral blood, basophils in peripheral
blood <20%, and no extramedullary involvement. NEL: same criteria as for CHR
but ANC ≥500/mm³ and <1000/mm³, or platelets ≥20,000/mm³ and
≤100,000/mm³.
b MCyR combines both complete (0% Ph+ metaphases) and partial
(>0%–35%) responses.
CI = confidence interval ULN = upper limit of normal range. |
In the SPRYCEL 140 mg once-daily group, the median time
to MaHR was 1.9 months (min-max: 0.7-14.5) for patients with accelerated phase
CML, 1.9 months (min-max: 0.9-6.2) for patients with myeloid blast phase CML,
and 1.8 months (min-max: 0.9-2.8) for patients with lymphoid blast phase CML.
In patients with myeloid blast phase CML, the median
duration of MaHR was 8.1 months (min-max: 2.7-21.1) and 9.0 (min-max: 1.8-23.1)
months for the 140 mg once-daily group and the 70 mg twice-daily group,
respectively. In patients with lymphoid blast phase CML, the median duration of
MaHR was 4.7 months (min-max: 3.0-9.0) and 7.9 months (min-max: 1.6-22.1) for
the 140 mg once-daily group and the 70 mg twice-daily group, respectively. In
patients with Ph+ ALL who were treated with SPRYCEL 140 mg once-daily, the
median duration of MaHR was 4.6 months (min-max: 1.4-10.2). The medians of
progression-free survival for patients with Ph+ ALL treated with SPRYCEL 140 mg
once-daily and 70 mg twice-daily were 4.0 months (min-max: 0.4-11.1) and 3.1
months (min-max: 0.3-20.8), respectively.
CML In Pediatric Patients
The efficacy of SPRYCEL in pediatric patients was
evaluated in two pediatric studies of 97 patients with chronic phase CML. Among
97 patients with chronic phase CML treated in two pediatric studies, an
open-label, non-randomized dose-ranging trial (NCT00306202) and an open-label,
non-randomized, single-arm trial (NCT00777036), 51 patients (exclusively from
the single-arm trial) had newly diagnosed with chronic phase CML and 46
patients (17 from the dose-ranging trial and 29 from the single-arm trial) were
resistant or intolerant to previous treatment with imatinib. Ninety-one of the
97 pediatric patients were treated with SPRYCEL tablets 60 mg/m² once daily
(maximum dose of 100 mg once daily for patients with high BSA). Patients were
treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Baseline demographic characteristics of the 46 imatinib
resistant or intolerant patients were: median age 13.5 years (range 2 to 20
years), 78.3% White, 15.2% Asian, 4.4% Black, 2.2% other, and 52% female.
Baseline characteristics of the 51 newly diagnosed patients were: median age
12.8 years (range 1.9 to 17.8 years), 60.8% White, 31.4% Asian, 5.9% Black, 2%
Other, and 49% female.
Median duration of follow-up was 5.2 years (range 0.5 to
9.3 years) for the imatinib resistant or intolerant patients and 4.5 years
(range 1.3 to 6.4 years) for the newly diagnosed patients, respectively.
Efficacy results for the two pediatric studies are summarized in Table 17.
Table 17 shows increasing trend for response for CCyR,
MCyR, and MMR across time (3 months to 24 months). The increasing trend in
response for all three endpoints is seen in both the newly diagnosed and
imatinib resistant or intolerant patients.
Table 17: Efficacy of SPRYCEL in Pediatric Patients
with CP-CML Cumulative Response Over Time by Minimum Follow-Up Period
|
3 months |
6 months |
12 months |
24 months |
CCyR (95% CI) |
Newly diagnosed |
43.1% |
66.7% |
96.1% |
96.1% |
(N = 51)a |
(29.3, 57.8) |
(52.1, 79.2) |
(86.5, 99.5) |
(86.5, 99.5) |
Prior imatinib (N = 46)b |
45.7% (30.9, 61.0) |
71.7% (56.5, 84.0) |
78.3% (63.6, 89.1) |
82.6% (68.6, 92.2) |
MCyR |
(95% CI) Newly diagnosed (N = 51)a |
60.8% (46.1, 74.2) |
90.2% (78.6, 96.7) |
98.0% (89.6, 100) |
98.0% (89.6, 100) |
Prior imatinib (N = 46)b |
60.9% (45.4, 74.9) |
82.6% (68.6, 92.2) |
89.1% (76.4, 96.4) |
89.1% (76.4, 96.4) |
MMR (95% CI) |
Newly diagnosed (N = 51)a |
7.8% (2.2, 18.9) |
31.4% (19.1, 45.9) |
56.9% (42.2, 70.7) |
74.5% (60.4, 85.7) |
Prior imatinib (N = 46)b |
15.2% (6.3, 28.9) |
26.1% (14.3, 41.1) |
39.1% (25.1, 54.6) |
52.2% (36.9, 67.1) |
aPatients from pediatric study of newly diagnosed
CP-CML receiving oral tablet formulation
bPatients from pediatric studies of imatinib-resistant or
-intolerant CP-CML receiving oral tablet formulation |
With a median follow-up of 4.5 years in newly diagnosed
patients, the median durations of CCyR, MCyR, MMR could not be estimated as
more than half of the responding patients had not progressed at the time of
data cut-off. Range of duration of response was (2.5+ to 66.5+ months for
CCyR), (1.4 to 66.5+ months for MCyR), and (5.4+ to 72.5+ months for subjects
who achieved MMR by month 24 and 0.03+ to 72.5+ months for subjects who
achieved MMR at any time), where '+' indicates a censored observation.
With a median follow-up of 5.2 years in
imatinib-resistant or - intolerant patients, the median durations of CCyR,
MCyR, and MMR could not be estimated as more than half the responding patients
had not progressed at the time of data cut-off. Range of duration of response
was (2.4 to 86.9+ months for CCyR), (2.4 to 86.9+ months for MCyR), and (2.6+
to 73.6+ months for MMR), where '+' indicates a censored observation.
The median time to response for MCyR was 2.9 months (95%
CI: 2.8 months, 3.5 months) in the pooled imatinib-resistant/intolerant CP-CML
patients. The median time to response for CCyR was 3.3 months (95% CI: 2.8
months, 4.7 months) in the pooled imatinib-resistant/intolerant CP-CML
patients. The median time to response for MMR was 8.3 months (95% CI: 5.0
months, 11.8 months) in the pooled imatinib- resistant/intolerant CP-CML
patients.
The median time to response for MCyR was 3.0 months (95%
CI: 2.8 months, 4.3 months) in the newly diagnosed treatment naive CP-CML
patients. The median time to response for CCyR was 5.5 months (95% CI: 3.0
months, 5.7 months) in the newly diagnosed treatment-naive CP-CML patients. The
median time to response for MMR was 8.9 months (95% CI: 6.2 months, 11.7
months) in the newly diagnosed treatment-naive CP-CML patients.
In the Phase II pediatric study, 1 newly diagnosed
patient and 2 imatinib-resistant or -intolerant patients progressed to blast
phase CML.