Clinical Pharmacology for Signifor-LAR
Mechanism Of Action
SIGNIFOR LAR is an injectable cyclohexapeptide, somatostatin analog. Pasireotide exerts its pharmacological activity via binding to somatostatin receptors (SSTR). There are 5 known human somatostatin receptor subtypes: SSTR 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. These receptor subtypes are expressed in different tissues under normal physiological conditions. Somatostatin analogs bind to SSTRs with different potencies. Pasireotide binds with high affinity to 4 of the 5 SSTRs (see Table 4).
Table 4 : Â Binding Affinities of Somatostatin (SRIF-14) and Pasireotide to the Five Human SSTR Subtypes (SSTR 1-5)
| Compound |
SSTR1 |
SSTR2 |
SSTR3 |
SSTR4 |
SSTR5 |
| Somatostatin (SRIF-14) |
0.93 ± 0.12 |
0.15 ± 0.02 |
0.56 ± 0.17 |
1.5 ± 0.4 |
0.29 ± 0.04 |
| Pasireotide |
9.3 ± 0.1 |
1.0 ± 0.1 |
1.5 ± 0.3 |
> 100 |
0.16 ± 0.01 |
| Results are the mean + SEM of IC50 values expressed as nmol/l (nM). |
Pharmacodynamics
Somatostatin receptors are expressed in many tissues including neuroendocrine tumors (e.g., growth hormone or adrenocorticotropic hormone secreting pituitary adenomas).
Acromegaly
Pasireotide binds to SSTR2 and SSTR5 subtype receptors which may be relevant for inhibition of GH secretion. In vivo studies show that SIGNIFOR LAR lowers GH and IGF-1 levels in patients with acromegaly.
Cushing’s Disease
Corticotroph tumor cells from Cushing’s disease patients frequently over-express SSTR5 whereas the other receptor subtypes are often not expressed or are expressed at lower levels. Pasireotide binds and activates the SSTRs resulting in inhibition of ACTH secretion, which leads to decreased cortisol secretion.
Cardiac Electrophysiology
Individually corrected QT (QTcI) interval was evaluated in a randomized, blinded, crossover study in healthy subjects investigating pasireotide subcutaneous doses of 0.6 mg and 1.95 mg twice daily, respectively. The maximum mean (95% upper confidence bound) placebo-subtracted QTcI change from baseline was 12.7 (14.7) ms and 16.6 (18.6) ms, respectively. Both pasireotide doses decreased heart rate, with a maximum mean (95% lower confidence bound) placebo-subtracted change from baseline of -10.9 (-11.9) beats per minute (bpm) observed at 1.5 hours for pasireotide 0.6 mg twice daily, and -15.2 (-16.5) bpm at 0.5 hours for pasireotide 1.95 mg twice daily.
The predicted pasireotide peak concentration (25.8 ng/mL) following SIGNIFOR LAR 60-mg dose in acromegaly patients is similar to the observed peak concentration (24.3 mg/mL) of the subcutaneous SIGNIFOR 0.6 mg twice daily dose and below the observed peak concentration (80.6 ng/mL) of the subcutaneous SIGNIFOR 1.95 mg twice daily dose. The predicted pasireotide peak concentration for the SIGNIFOR LAR dose of 40 mg in Cushing’s disease patients is 14 ng/mL.
Pharmacokinetics
Pasireotide for intramuscular use is formulated as microspheres for long-acting release. After a single injection, the plasma pasireotide concentration shows an initial burst release on the injection day, followed by a dip from Day 2 to Day 7, then a slow increase to the maximum concentration around Day 21, and a slow declining phase over the next weeks, concomitant with the terminal degradation phase of the polymer matrix of the dosage form.
Absorption And Distribution
No studies have been conducted to evaluate the absolute bioavailability of pasireotide in humans. Food effect is unlikely to occur since SIGNIFOR LAR is administered via a parenteral route.
In healthy volunteers, pasireotide administered as SIGNIFOR LAR is widely distributed with large apparent volume of distribution (Vz/F > 100 L). Distribution between blood and plasma is concentration-independent and shows that pasireotide is primarily located in the plasma (91%). Plasma protein binding is moderate (88%) and independent of concentration.
Pasireotide has low passive permeability and is likely to be a substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), but the impact of P-gp on the ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion) of pasireotide is expected to be low. In clinical testing in healthy volunteers, P-gp inhibition did not affect the rate or extent of pasireotide availability [see DRUG INTERACTIONS]. At therapeutic dose levels, pasireotide is not expected to be a substrate of BCRP (breast cancer resistance protein), OCT1 (organic cation transporter 1), or OATP (organic anion-transporting polypeptides) 1B1, 1B3, or 2B1.
Elimination
Metabolism And Excretion
Pasireotide was shown to be highly metabolically stable in human liver and kidney microsomes. In healthy volunteers, pasireotide in its unchanged form is the predominant form found in plasma, urine and feces. Somatropin may increase CYP450 enzymes and, therefore, suppression of GH secretion by somatostatin analogs including pasireotide may decrease the metabolic clearance of compounds metabolized by CYP450 enzymes.
Pasireotide is eliminated mainly via hepatic clearance (biliary excretion) with a small contribution of the renal route. In a human ADME study with subcutaneous SIGNIFOR with a single dose 0.6 mg, 55.9 ± 6.63% of the radioactivity dose was recovered over the first 10 days post dosing, including 48.3 ± 8.16% of the radioactivity in feces and 7.63 ± 2.03% in urine.
The apparent clearance (CL/F) of SIGNIFOR LAR in healthy volunteers is on average 4.5-8.5 L/hour.
Steady-State Pharmacokinetics
PK steady-state for SIGNIFOR LAR is achieved after 3 monthly doses. Following multiple intramuscular doses every 4 weeks (every 28 days), SIGNIFOR LAR demonstrates approximately dose-proportional PK exposures (steady-state trough; Ctrough, ss) in the dose range of 10 mg to 60 mg every 4 weeks.
Special Populations
Population PK analyses of SIGNIFOR LAR suggest that race, gender, and body weight do not have clinically relevant influence on circulating levels of pasireotide. No dose adjustment is required for demographics.
Pediatric Patients
No studies have been performed in pediatric patients [see Use In Specific Populations].
Geriatric Patients
Age is not a significant covariate in the population PK analysis. Therefore age is not expected to significantly impact circulating levels of pasireotide.
Efficacy and safety data on patients older than 65 years are limited [see Use In Specific Populations].
Hepatic Impairment
In a clinical study with a single subcutaneous dose of 600 μg pasireotide in subjects with impaired hepatic function (Child-Pugh A, B, and C), subjects with moderate and severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh B and C)showed significantly higher exposures than subjects with normal hepatic function. Upon comparing with the control group, AUCinf was increased by 12%, 56%, and 42%; and Cmax was increased by 3%, 46%, and 33% respectively, in the mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment groups [see Use In Specific Populations, DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION].
Renal Impairment
Clinical studies have not been performed in patients with renal impairment. However, renal clearance has a minor contribution to the elimination of pasireotide in humans. Renal function (creatinine clearance and estimated glomerular filtration rate) is not a covariate in the population PK analysis. Therefore, renal function is not expected to significantly impact the circulating levels of pasireotide [see Use In Specific Populations].
Clinical Studies
Drug-Naïve Patients With Acromegaly
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of SIGNIFOR LAR in patients with active acromegaly. A total of 358 patients naïve to drugs used to treat acromegaly were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to SIGNIFOR LAR or another somatostatin analog active comparator. Randomization was stratified based on previous pituitary surgical status (e.g., at least 1 prior pituitary surgery versus no prior pituitary surgery).
In the overall study population, 52% were female and the average age of patients was 45 years. Sixty percent of patients were Caucasian, 23% Asian, 12% Other, 3% American Indian, and 2% were Black. Forty-two percent of patients had previous pituitary surgery, and 1 patient had a history of pituitary radiation therapy. Median time between diagnosis and trial participation was 6 months. Median GH was 8.8 mcg/L (range: 0.8-200 mcg/L) and 10.1 mcg/L (range: 0.6-169.6 mcg/L) for SIGNIFOR LAR and active comparator, respectively at baseline. Median standardized IGF-1, defined as IGF-1 value divided by the ULN (i.e., fold above the ULN), was 2.9 (range: 0.9-6.9) and 2.9 (range: 0.8-7.3), for SIGNIFOR LAR and active comparator, respectively, at baseline.
The starting dose of SIGNIFOR LAR was 40 mg. Dose increase was allowed in both arms, at the discretion of investigators, after 3 and 6 months of treatment if mean GH was greater than or equal to 2.5 mcg/L and/or IGF1 was greater than the ULN for age and sex. The maximum allowed dose for SIGNIFOR LAR was 60 mg. The maximum dose of the active comparator was not used in this trial because the trial was multi-national and the maximum dose approved in the US was not approved in all participating countries.
The efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with a mean GH level less than 2.5 mcg/L and a normal IGF-1 levels at month 12 (age-and sex-adjusted) (see Table 5, Figure 3, and Figure 4). The proportion of patients achieving this level of control was 31.3% and 19.2% for SIGNIFOR LAR and active comparator, respectively. The changes in mean GH and IGF-1 levels by study visits in subjects with a measurement at these visits (observed cases) are shown in Figures 3 and 4.
Table 5 :  Results at Month 12 in Drug-Naïve Patients Study
|
SIGNIFOR LAR (40-60 mg) %
N = 176 |
Active Comparatorc %
N = 182 |
| GH < 2.5 mcg/L and normalized IGF-1a |
31.3 %b |
19.2% |
| GH < 2.5 mcg/L and IGF-1 < ULN |
35.8% |
20.9% |
| Normalized IGF-1 |
38.6%b |
23.6% |
| GH < 2.5 mcg/L |
48.3% |
51.6% |
aPrimary endpoint [patients with IGF-1< lower limit of normal (LLN) were not considered as “responders”]. ULN = Upper limit of normal.
bp-value < 0.01 for treatment difference.
cThe maximum dose approved for use in the United States was not used in this trial but the majority of patients were receiving the dose most commonly used in the United States to treat acromegaly. |
Figure 3: Mean GH (mcg/L) Levels By Visit in Drug Naïve Patient Studya
aNumbers of patients with a GH value at the given timepoint for SIGNIFOR LAR/Active comparator arm are displayed as xxx/xxx on the x-axis.
Figure 4: Mean Standardized IGF-1 Levels* By Visit in Drug Naïve Patient Studyb
bNumbers of patients with an IGF-1 value at the given timepoint for SIGNIFOR LAR/Active comparator arm are displayed as xxx/xxx on the x axis.
Biochemical control was achieved by Month 3 in 30.1% of patients in the SIGNIFOR LAR arm. Ninety-eight percent of patients treated with SIGNIFOR LAR had either a reduction or no change in tumor volume from baseline assessed by MRI at Month 12. The median (range) change in tumor volume was a reduction of 39.8% (-97.6% to 16.9%).
Additionally, ring size and acromegaly symptoms score (i.e., headache, fatigue, perspiration, paresthesia, and osteoarthralgia) were followed. At Month 12, reductions in ring size and in symptom severity scores in both treatment groups compared to baseline were noted.
Patients With Acromegaly Inadequately Controlled On Other Somatostatin Analogs
A multicenter, randomized, 3-arm study was conducted in patients with acromegaly inadequately controlled on somatostatin analogs. Patients were randomized to double-blind SIGNIFOR LAR 40 mg (n = 65) or SIGNIFOR LAR 60 mg (n = 65) or to continued open-label pretrial somatostatin analog therapies at maximal or near maximal doses (n = 68). A total of 181 patients completed the 6-month trial.
Inadequate control was defined as a GH concentration of greater than 2.5 mcg/L (i.e., mean of 5 samples over 2 hours) and a sex- and age-adjusted IGF-1 level greater than 1.3 times the upper limit of normal. Patients were required to have been treated with other somatostatin analogs for at least 6 months prior to randomization. Note that the maximum dose for one of the active comparators approved for use in the United States was not used in this multinational trial; approximately 75% of the population in the comparator group was receiving this active comparator.
In the overall study population, 56% were female and the average age of patients was 45 years. Eighty-one percent of patients were Caucasian, 7% Other, 8% Black, 2% American Indian, and 2% Asian. The percentage of patients with previous pituitary surgery in the SIGNIFOR LAR 40 mg and 60 mg arms, and in the active control arm was 77%, 63%, and 60%, respectively. Three percent of patients in the SIGNIFOR LAR groups and 7% of patients in the active control arm had prior radiation therapy. Median (range) time from diagnosis to participation in this trial was 50 (10-337) months, 55 (8-357) months, and 54 (8-357) months in the SIGNIFOR LAR 40 mg, 60 mg and the pretrial therapy arms, respectively. At baseline, median (range) GH was 7.1 (1.0200) mcg/L, 5.3 (1.4-113.8) mcg/L and 6.1 (1.0-92.4) mcg/L in the SIGNIFOR LAR 40 mg, 60 mg and the pretrial therapy arms, respectively. Baseline median standardized IGF-1 (defined as IGF-1 value divided by the ULN) values were 2.3, 2.6 and 2.9 in the SIGNIFOR LAR 40 mg, 60 mg and the pretrial therapy arms, respectively.
The efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with a mean GH level less than 2.5 mcg/L and normal IGF-1 levels at week 24. The primary analysis compared SIGNIFOR LAR 60 mg and 40 mg to continued pretrial therapy (i.e., no change in treatment). The proportion of patients achieving biochemical control was 15.4% and 20.0% for SIGNIFOR LAR 40 mg and 60 mg, respectively, at 6 months.
Biochemical control was achieved by Month 3 in 15.4% and 18.5% of patients in the SIGNIFOR LAR 40 mg and 60 mg arms, respectively.
Table 6 : Results at 6 Months in Inadequately Controlled Patient Study
|
SIGNIFOR LAR 40 mg %
N = 6 |
SIGNIFOR LAR 60 mg %
N= 65 |
Continued Pre-Trial Therapy Control Armb %
N = 68 |
| GH < 2.5 mcg/L and normalized IGF-1a |
15.4% |
20.0% |
0% |
| Normalization of IGF -1 |
24.6% |
26.2% |
0% |
| GH < 2.5 mcg/L |
35.4% |
43.1% |
13.2% |
aPrimary endpoint (patients with IGF-1 < lower limit of normal (LLN) were not considered as “responders”).
bFor one of the active comparators, the maximum dose approved for use in the United States was not used in this trial but the majority of patients were receiving the dose most commonly used in the United States to treat acromegaly |
Eighty-one percent and 70% of patients treated with SIGNIFOR LAR 40 mg and 60 mg, respectively, had either a reduction or no change in tumor volume from baseline assessed by MRI at Month 6. The median (range) change in tumor volume was a reduction of -10.4% (-74.5% to 19.4%) and -6.3% (-66.7% to 14.5%) from baseline for SIGNIFOR LAR 40 mg and 60 mg, respectively.
Patients With Cushing’s Disease
A Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two dose regimens of SIGNIFOR LAR over a 12-month treatment period in patients with persistent or recurrent Cushing’s disease, or de novo patients who were not considered candidates for pituitary surgery.
The study enrolled 150 patients with a screening mean urinary free cortisol level (mUFC) ≥ 1.5 and ≤ 5 x ULN, who were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a SIGNIFOR LAR starting dose of either 10 mg intramuscularly once every 28 days or 30 mg intramuscularly once every 28 days. Randomization was stratified by values of mUFC at screening (1.5 to < 2 x ULN versus 2 to 5 x ULN, respectively).
After four months of treatment, patients who had a mUFC ≤ 1.5 x ULN continued on the blinded dose to which they were randomized. Patients with a mUFC > 1.5 x ULN at Month 4 had their doses increased in a blinded manner from 10 mg to 30 mg, or from 30 mg to 40 mg, provided there were no tolerability concerns. Additional dose increases were allowed at Month 7 and Month 9 (by one dose level if the mUFC was > 1 x ULN).
Dose reduction by one dose level for tolerability was allowed in a blinded fashion for the first seven months, with a minimum dose level of 5 mg. After the first seven months, blinded down titration of more than one dose level was allowed at any month.
After twelve months of treatment (core phase), patients had the option to enter an extension to continue to receive SIGNIFOR LAR if they benefited from treatment.
The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients in each arm who were mUFC responders (mUFC ≤ ULN) after seven months of treatment, with or without up-titration at Month 4. The key secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients in each arm who were mUFC responders after seven months of treatment and who did not up-titrate the dose prior to Month 7. The pre-specified boundary of the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for efficacy for both the primary and key secondary endpoints was 15%. Patients with missing mUFC assessment at Month 7 were classified as non-responders. Other secondary endpoints included changes from baseline in 24-hour UFC, plasma ACTH, and serum cortisol levels. All analyses were conducted based on the randomized dose groups.
Baseline demographics and disease history were well balanced between the two randomized dose groups and consistent with the epidemiology of the disease. The mean age of patients was approximately 38.5 years with a predominance of female patients (78.7%). The majority of the patients had persistent or recurrent Cushing’s disease (82.0%). The median value of the baseline 24-hour mUFC for all patients was 396.9 nmol/24 hours (ULN: 166.5 nmol/24 hours). About three-quarters of all randomized patients completed seven months of treatment, and about two-thirds of all randomized patients completed twelve months of treatment.
The study met the primary efficacy objective for both dose groups. Patients were considered responders if they remained on treatment until at least Month 7 and achieved a Month 7 mUFC ≤ 1 x ULN, regardless of up-titration at Month 4. The proportion of patients with mUFC response at Month 7 was 39.2% (95% CI: 28.0, 51.2)in the 10 mg arm and 40.8% (95% CI: 29.7, 52.7) in the 30 mg arm. The responder rate at Month 12 was 35.1% (26/74) and 25.0% (19/76) in the 10 mg and 30 mg starting dose groups, respectively.
Table 7 : Â Response Rates at Month 7 per Randomized Dose Group and According to Screening mUFC
|
Pasireotide LAR 10 mg Every 28 Days
n/N (%) |
Pasireotide LAR 30 mg Every 28 Days
n/N (%) |
| Screening mUFC category |
95% CI |
95% CI |
| All patients |
29/74 (39.2) |
31/76 (40.8) |
| (28.0, 51.2) |
(29.7, 52.7) |
| ≥ 1.5 x ULN to < 2 x ULN |
11/25 (44.0) |
13/25 (52.0) |
| (24.4, 65.1) |
(31.3, 72.2) |
| ≥ 2 x ULN to ≤5 x ULN |
18/49 (36.7) |
18/51 (35.3) |
| (23.4, 51.7) |
(22.4, 49.9) |
| There were 17 (23.0%) patients in 10 mg arm and 9 (11.8%) in the 30 mg arm with missing value mUFC assessments at Month 7 who were classified as non-responders. |
The study met the key secondary efficacy objective for both dose groups. At Month 4, 31/74 (41.9%) and 28/76 (36.8%) patients were up-titrated in the pasireotide LAR 10 mg and 30 mg arms, respectively. When all patients who up-titrated prior to Month 7 were counted as non-responders, Month 7 mUFC response was observed in 25.7% (95% CI: 16.2 to 37.2) and 31.6% (95% CI: 21.4 to 43.3) of patients randomized to pasireotide LAR at a starting dose of 10 mg once every 28 days and 30 mg once every 28 days, respectively.
A secondary efficacy analysis was conducted for the combined proportion of patients who attained mUFC ≤ ULN (controlled) or had at least 50% reduction in mUFC (partially controlled) in the core phase of the study. The combined rate of controlled or partially controlled responders at Month 7 constituted 44.6% and 53.9% of patients randomized to the 10 mg and 30 mg dose groups, respectively (Table 8).
Table 8 : Response Rates at Month 7 per Randomized Dose Group -Supportive Efficacy Analysis
| Response Category |
Pasireotide LAR 10 mg Every 28 Days
(N = 74)n (%) |
Pasireotide LAR 30 mg Every 28 Days
(N = 76)n (%) |
| Controlled (mUFC ≤ ULN) |
29 (39.2%) |
31 (40.8%) |
| Partially controlled (≥ 50% reduction in mUFC) |
4 (5.4%) |
10 (13.2%) |
| Combined |
33 (44.6%) |
41 (53.9%) |
Decreases in median mUFC levels at Month 7 compared to baseline, as measured by overall percentage of reduction, are shown in Table 9. Reductions in serum cortisol and plasma ACTH levels were also observed at Months 7 and 12 for each dose group.
Table 9 : Median Percentage Change from Baseline in Mean Urinary Free Cortisol (mUFC) at Month 7 by Randomized Dose Group
|
|
Pasireotide LAR 10 mg Every 28 Days % change |
Pasireotide LAR 30 mg Every 28 Days % change |
| mUFC levels (nmol/24hr) |
N |
74 |
76 |
| Baseline |
Mean (SD) |
462.6 (256.41) |
477.1 (331.75) |
|
Median |
409.8 |
371.6 |
| Median change in mUFC (% from baseline) |
Month 7 |
-41.3% |
-41.4% |
| Note: Median % change from baseline in mUFC at Month 7 are calculated by imputing missing values with the worst observed % change in mUFC at Month 7 within each treatment group. |
Note: Median % change from baseline in mUFC at Month 7 are calculated by imputing missing values with the worst observed % change in mUFC at Month 7 within each treatment group.