Clinical Pharmacology for Segluromet
Mechanism Of Action
SEGLUROMET
SEGLUROMET combines two antihyperglycemic agents with complementary mechanisms of action to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: ertugliflozin, a SGLT2 inhibitor, and metformin hydrochloride, a member of the biguanide class.
Ertugliflozin
SGLT2 is the predominant transporter responsible for reabsorption of glucose from the glomerular filtrate back into the circulation. Ertugliflozin is an inhibitor of SGLT2. By inhibiting SGLT2, ertugliflozin reduces renal reabsorption of filtered glucose and lowers the renal threshold for glucose, and thereby increases urinary glucose excretion.
Metformin HCl
Metformin is an antihyperglycemic agent which improves glucose tolerance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, lowering both basal and postprandial plasma glucose. Its pharmacologic mechanisms of action are different from other classes of oral antihyperglycemic agents. Metformin decreases hepatic glucose production, decreases intestinal absorption of glucose, and improves insulin sensitivity by increasing peripheral glucose uptake and utilization. Metformin does not produce hypoglycemia in either patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus or normal subjects (except in special circumstances) [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS] and does not cause hyperinsulinemia. With metformin therapy, insulin secretion remains unchanged while fasting insulin levels and day-long plasma insulin response may actually decrease.
Pharmacodynamics
Ertugliflozin
Urinary Glucose Excretion And Urinary Volume
Dose-dependent increases in the amount of glucose excreted in urine were observed in healthy subjects and in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus following single-andmultiple-dose administration of ertugliflozin. Dose-response modeling indicates that ertugliflozin 5 mg and 15 mg result in near maximal urinary glucose excretion (UGE). Enhanced UGE is maintained after multiple-dose administration. UGE with ertugliflozin also results in increases in urinary volume.
Cardiac Electrophysiology
The effect of ertugliflozin on QTc interval was evaluated in a Phase 1 randomized, placebo-and positive-controlled 3-period crossover study in 42 healthy subjects. At 6.7 times the therapeutic exposures with maximum recommended dose, ertugliflozin does not prolong QTc to any clinically relevant extent.
Pharmacokinetics
General Introduction
Ertugliflozin
The pharmacokinetics of ertugliflozin are similarin healthysubjects and patients with type2diabetes mellitus. The steady state mean plasma AUC and Cmax were 398 ng•hr/mL and 81.3 ng/mL, respectively, with 5mg ertugliflozin once-daily treatment, and 1,193 ng•hr/mL and 268 ng/mL, respectively, with 15 mg ertugliflozin once-daily treatment. Steady-state is reached after 4 to 6 days of once-daily dosing with ertugliflozin. Ertugliflozin does not exhibit time-dependent pharmacokinetics and accumulates in plasma up to 10-40% following multiple dosing.
Absorption
SEGLUROMET
The effects of a high-fat meal on the pharmacokinetics of ertugliflozin and metformin when administered as SEGLUROMET tablets are comparable to those reported for the individual tablets. Food had no meaningful effect on AUCinf of ertugliflozin and metformin, but reduced mean ertugliflozin Cmax by approximately 41% and metformin Cmax by approximately 29% compared to the fasted condition.
Ertugliflozin
Following single-dose oral administration of 5 mg and 15 mg of ertugliflozin, peak plasma concentrations of ertugliflozin occur at 1 hour postdose (median Tmax) under fasted conditions. Plasma Cmax and AUC of ertugliflozin increase in a dose-proportional manner following single doses from 0.5 mg (0.1 times the lowest recommended dose) to 300 mg (20 times the highest recommended dose) and following multiple doses from 1 mg (0.2 times the lowest recommended dose) to 100 mg (6.7 times the highest recommended dose). The absolute oral bioavailability of ertugliflozin following administration of a 15 mg dose is approximately100%.
Effect Of Food
Administration of ertugliflozin with a high-fat and high-calorie meal decreases ertugliflozin Cmax by 29% and prolongs Tmax by1 hour, butdoes notalter AUC as compared with the fasted state. The observed effect offood on ertugliflozin pharmacokinetics is not considered clinically relevant, and ertugliflozin may be administered with or without food. In Phase 3 clinical trials, ertugliflozin was administered without regard to meals.
Metformin hydrochloride
The absolute bioavailability of a metformin HCl 500-mg tablet given under fasting conditions is approximately 50-60%. Studies using single oral doses of metformin hydrochloride tablets 500 mg to 1,500 mg, and 850mg to 2,550 mg (approximately 1.3 times the maximum recommended daily dosage), indicate that there is a lack of dose proportionality with increasing doses, which is due to decreased absorption rather than an alternation in elimination. Food decreases the extent of and slightly delays the absorption of metformin, as shown by approximately a 40% lower mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax), a 25% lower area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC), and a 35-minute prolongation of time to peak plasma concentration (Tmax) following administration ofa single 850-mg tablet of metformin with food, compared to the same tablet strength administered fasting. The clinical relevance of these decreases is unknown.
Distribution
Ertugliflozin
The mean steady-state volume of distribution of ertugliflozin following an intravenous dose is 85.5 L. Plasma protein binding of ertugliflozin is 93.6% and is independent of ertugliflozin plasma concentrations. Plasma protein binding is not meaningfully altered in patients with renal or hepatic impairment. The blood-to-plasma concentration ratio of ertugliflozin is 0.66.
Metformin
The apparent volume of distribution (V/F) of metformin following single oral doses of metformin hydrochloride tablets 850 mg averaged 654 ± 358L. Metformin is negligibly bound to plasma proteins, in contrast to sulfonylureas, which are more than 90% protein bound. Metformin partitions into erythrocytes, most likely as a function oftime. At usual clinical doses and dosing schedules of metformin hydrochloride tablets, steady-state plasma concentrations of metformin are reached within 24-48 hours and are generally <1 mcg/mL. During controlled clinical trials of metformin, maximum metformin plasma levels did not exceed 5mcg/mL, even at maximum doses.
Elimination
Metabolism
Ertugliflozin
Metabolism is the primary clearance mechanism for ertugliflozin. The major metabolic pathway for ertugliflozin is UGT1A9 and UGT2B7-mediated O-glucuronidation to two glucuronides that are pharmacologically inactive at clinically relevant concentrations. CYP-mediated (oxidative) metabolism of ertugliflozin is minimal (12%).
Metformin
Intravenous single-dose studies in normal subjects demonstrate that metformin is excreted unchanged in the urine and does not undergo hepatic metabolism (no metabolites have been identified in humans) nor biliary excretion.
Excretion
Ertugliflozin
The mean systemic plasma clearance following an intravenous 100 μg dose was 11.2 L/hr. The mean elimination half-life in type 2 diabetic patients with normal renal function was estimated to be 16.6 hours based on the population pharmacokinetic analysis. Following administration of an oral [14C]-ertugliflozin solution to healthy subjects, approximately 40.9% and 50.2% of the drug-related radioactivity was eliminated in feces and urine, respectively. Only 1.5% of the administered dose was excreted as unchanged ertugliflozin in urine and 33.8% as unchanged ertugliflozin in feces, which is likely due to biliary excretion of glucuronide metabolites and subsequent hydrolysis to parent.
Metformin
Renal clearance is approximately 3.5times greater than creatinine clearance, which indicates that tubular secretion is the major route of metformin elimination. Following oral administration, approximately 90% of the absorbed drug is eliminated via the renal route within the first 24 hours, with a plasma elimination half-life of approximately 6.2hours. In blood, the elimination half-life is approximately 17.6hours, suggesting that the erythrocyte mass may be a compartment of distribution.
SpecificPopulations
Patients With Renal Impairment
SEGLUROMET
Studies characterizing the pharmacokinetics of ertugliflozin and metformin after administration of SEGLUROMET in renally impaired patients have not been performed [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION].
Ertugliflozin
In a clinical pharmacology study in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment (as determined by eGFR), following a single-dose administration of 15 mg ertugliflozin, the mean increases in AUC of ertugliflozin were 1.6-, 1.7-, and 1.6-fold, respectively, for mild, moderate, and severe renally-impaired patients compared to subjects with normal renal function. These increases in ertugliflozin AUC are not considered clinically meaningful. The 24-hour urinary glucose excretion declined with increasing severity of renal impairment [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS and Use In Specific Populations]. The plasma protein binding of ertugliflozin was unaffected in patients with renal impairment.
Metformin
In patients with decreased renal function, the plasma and blood half-life of metformin is prolonged and the renal clearance is decreased [see CONTRAINDICATIONS and WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS].
Patients With Hepatic Impairment
Ertugliflozin
Moderate hepatic impairment(based on the Child-Pugh classification) did notresultin an increase in exposure of ertugliflozin. The AUC of ertugliflozin decreased by approximately 13%, and Cmax decreased by approximately 21% compared to subjects with normal hepatic function. This decrease in ertugliflozin exposure is not considered clinically meaningful. There is no clinical experience in patients with Child-Pugh class C (severe) hepatic impairment. The plasma protein binding of ertugliflozin was unaffected in patients with moderate hepatic impairment [see Use In Specific Populations].
Metformin
No pharmacokinetic studies of metformin have been conducted in patients with hepatic impairment [see Use In Specific Populations].
Effects Of Age, Body Weight, Gender, And Race
Ertugliflozin
Based on a population pharmacokinetic analysis, age, body weight, gender, and race do nothave a clinically meaningful effect on the pharmacokinetics of ertugliflozin.
Metformin
Limited data from controlled pharmacokinetic studies of metformin in healthy elderly subjects suggest that total plasma clearance of metformin is decreased, the half-life is prolonged, and Cmax is increased, compared to healthy young subjects. From these data, it appears that the change in metformin pharmacokinetics with aging is primarily accounted forby a change in renal function.
Metformin pharmacokinetic parameters did not differ significantly between normal subjects and patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus when analyzed according to gender. Similarly, in controlled clinical studies in patients with type 2diabetes mellitus, the antihyperglycemic effect of metformin was comparable in males and females.
No studies of metformin pharmacokinetic parameters according to race have been performed. In controlled clinical studies of metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, the antihyperglycemic effect was comparable in Whites (n=249), Blacks (n=51), and Hispanics (n=24).
Drug Interaction Studies
SEGLUROMET
Coadministration of single dose of ertugliflozin (15 mg) and metformin (1,000 mg) did not meaningfully alter the pharmacokinetics of either ertugliflozin or metformin in healthy subjects.
Pharmacokinetic drug interaction studies with SEGLUROMET have not been performed; however, such studies have been conducted with ertugliflozin and metformin, the individual components of SEGLUROMET.
Ertugliflozin
In Vitro Assessment Of Drug Interactions
In in vitro studies, ertugliflozin and ertugliflozin glucuronides did not inhibit CYP450 isoenzymes (CYPs) 1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2C8, 2B6, 2D6, or 3A4, and did not induce CYPs 1A2, 2B6, or 3A4. Ertugliflozin was not a time-dependent inhibitor ofCYP3A in vitro. Ertugliflozin did not inhibit UGT1A6, 1A9, or 2B7 in vitro and was a weak inhibitor(IC50 >39 μM) ofUGT1A1 and 1A4. Ertugliflozin glucuronides did not inhibit UGT1A1, 1A4, 1A6, 1A9, or2B7 in vitro. Overall, ertugliflozin is unlikely to affect the pharmacokinetics of drugs eliminated by these enzymes. Ertugliflozin is a substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) transporters and is not asubstrate of organic anion transporters (OAT1,OAT3), organic cation transporters (OCT1, OCT2), or organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATP1B1, OATP1B3). Ertugliflozin or ertugliflozin glucuronides do not meaningfully inhibit P-gp, OCT2, OAT1, or OAT3 transporters, or transporting polypeptides OATP1B1 and OATP1B3, at clinically relevant concentrations. Overall, ertugliflozin is unlikely to affect the pharmacokinetics of concurrently administered medications that are substrates of these transporters.
In Vivo Assessment of Drug Interactions
No dose adjustment of SEGLUROMET is recommended when coadministered with commonly prescribed medicinal products. Ertugliflozin pharmacokinetics were similar with and without coadministration of metformin, glimepiride, sitagliptin, and simvastatin in healthy subjects (see Figure 1). Coadministration of ertugliflozin with multiple doses of600 mg once-daily rifampin (an inducer of UGT and CYP enzymes) resulted in approximately 39% and 15% mean reductions in ertugliflozin AUC and Cmax, respectively, relative to ertugliflozin administered alone. These changes in exposure are not considered clinically relevant. Ertugliflozin had no clinically relevant effect on the pharmacokinetics of metformin, glimepiride, sitagliptin, and simvastatin when coadministered in healthy subjects (see Figure 2). Physiologically-based PK (PBPK) modeling suggests that coadministration of mefenamic acid (UGT inhibitor) may increase the AUC and Cmax of ertugliflozin by 1.51-and 1.19-fold, respectively. These predicted changes in exposure are not considered clinically relevant.
Figure 1: Effects of Other Drugs on the Pharmacokinetics of Ertugliflozin
Figure 2: Effects of Ertugliflozin on the Pharmacokinetics of Other Drugs
Metformin Hydrochloride
Table 4: Effect of Metformin HCl on Systemic Exposure of Co-administered Drugs
| Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug* |
Dose of Metformin HCl* |
Geometric Mean Ratio (ratio with/without metformin) No Effect = 1.00 |
|
AUC† |
Cmax |
| No dosing adjustments required for the following: |
| Cimetidine |
400 mg |
850 mg |
Cimetidine |
0.95‡ |
1.01 |
| Glyburide |
5 mg |
500 mg§ |
Glyburide |
0.78¶ |
0.63¶ |
| Furosemide |
40 mg |
850 mg |
Furosemide |
0.87¶ |
0.69¶ |
| Nifedipine |
10 mg |
850 mg |
Nifedipine |
1.10‡ |
1.08 |
| Propranolol |
40 mg |
850 mg |
Propranolol |
1.01‡ |
0.94 |
| Ibuprofen |
400 mg |
850 mg |
Ibuprofen |
0.97# |
1.01# |
* All doses administered as single dose unless otherwise specified.
† AUC is reported as AUC0-∞ unless otherwise specified.
‡AUC0-24hr.
§ Metformin HCl extended-release tablets 500 mg.
¶ Ratio ofarithmetic means, p value ofdifference <0.05. # Ratio ofarithmetic means. |
Table 5: Effect of Coadministered Drugs on Systemic Exposure of Metformin HCl
| Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug* |
Dose of Metformin HCl* |
Geometric Mean Ratio (ratio with/without coadministered drug) No Effect = 1.00 |
|
AUC† |
Cmax |
| No dosing adjustments required for the following: |
| Glyburide |
5 mg |
500 mg‡ |
Metformin‡ |
0.98§ |
0.99§ |
| Furosemide |
40 mg |
850 mg |
Metformin |
1.09§ |
1.22§ |
| Nifedipine |
10 mg |
850 mg |
Metformin |
1.16 |
1.21 |
| Propranolol |
40 mg |
850 mg |
Metformin |
0.90 |
0.94 |
| Ibuprofen |
400 mg |
850 mg |
Metformin |
1.05§ |
1.07§ |
| Drugs that are eliminated by renal tubular secretion may increase the accumulation of metformin [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS and DRUG INTERACTIONS]. |
| Cimetidine |
400 mg |
850 mg |
Metformin |
1.40 |
1.61 |
| Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors may cause metabolic acidosis [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS and DRUG INTERACTIONS]. |
| Topiramate |
100 mg¶ |
500 mg¶ |
Metformin |
1.251 |
1.17 |
* All doses administered as single dose unless otherwise specified.
† AUC is reported as AUC0-∞ unless otherwise specified.
‡Metformin hydrochloride extended-release tablets 500 mg.
§ Ratio ofarithmetic means.
¶ Steady-state 100 mg topiramate every12 hr+ metformin500 mg every12 hr AUC =AUC0-12hr. |
Clinical Studies
Glycemic Control Trials In Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
The efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin in combination with metformin have been studied in 4multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-and active comparator-controlled, clinical studies involving 3,643 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. These studies included White, Hispanic, Black, Asian, and other racial and ethnic groups, and patients with an age range of 21 to 86 years.
In VERTIS CV, ertugliflozin has been studied as add on to insulin (with or without metformin) and as add on to metformin plus a sulfonylurea in sub studies.
In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, treatment with ertugliflozin in combination with metformin reduced hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) compared to placebo.
In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with ertugliflozin in combination with metformin, the reduction in HbA1c was generally similar across subgroups defined by age, sex, race, geographic region, baseline body mass index (BMI), and duration of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Ertugliflozin As Add-on Combination Therapy With Metformin
A total of621 patients with type2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled (HbA1cbetween 7% and 10.5%) on metformin monotherapy (≥1,500 mg/day for ≥8 weeks) participated in a randomized, double-blind, multi-center, 26-week, placebo-controlled study (NCT02033889) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin in combination with metformin. Patients entered a 2-week, single-blind, placebo run-in, and were randomized to placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg, or ertugliflozin 15 mg administered once daily in addition to continuation of background metformin therapy.
At Week 26, statistically significant reductions in HbA1c were observed in the ertugliflozin 5 mg and 15 mg groups compared to placebo. Ertugliflozin also resulted in a greater proportion of patients achieving an HbA1c <7% compared to placebo (see Table 6and Figure 3).
Table 6: Results at Week 26 from a Placebo-Controlled Study for Ertugliflozin Used in Combination with Metformin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus*
|
Placebo |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg |
| HbA1c (%) |
N = 207 |
N = 205 |
N = 201 |
| Baseline (mean) |
8.2 |
8.1 |
8.1 |
| Change from baseline (LS mean†) |
-0.2 |
-0.7 |
-0.9 |
| Difference from placebo (LS mean†, 95% CI) |
|
-0.5‡
(-0.7, -0.4) |
-0.7‡
(-0.9, -0.5) |
| Patients [N (%)] with HbA1c <7% |
38 (18.4) |
74 (36.3) |
87 (43.3) |
| FPG (mg/dL) |
N = 202 |
N = 199 |
N = 201 |
| Baseline (mean) |
169.1 |
168.1 |
167.9 |
| Change from baseline (LS mean†) |
-8.7 |
-30.3 |
-40.9 |
| Difference from placebo (LS mean†, 95% CI) |
|
-21.6‡
(-27.8, -15.5) |
-32.3‡
(-38.5, -26.0) |
* Nincludes all randomized and treated patients witha baseline measurement of the outcome variable. At Week 26, the primary HbA1c endpoint was missing for 12%, 6%, and 9% of patients, and during the trial, rescue medication was initiated by 18%, 3%, and 1% of patients randomized to placebo, ertugliflozin 5mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg, respectively. Missing Week26 measurements were imputed using multiple imputation with a mean equal to the baseline value of the patient. Results include measurements collected after initiation of rescue medication. For those patients who did not receive rescue medication and had values measured at 26weeks, the mean changes from baseline for HbA1c were -0.2%, -0.7%, and -1.0% for placebo, ertuglifloz in 5mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg, respectively.
† Intent-to-treat analysis using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline value, prior antihy perglycemic medication, menopausal status and baseline eGFR.
‡p<0.001 compared to placebo. |
The mean baseline body weight was 84.5 kg, 84.9 kg, and 85.3 kg in the placebo, ertugliflozin5 mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg groups, respectively. The mean changes from baseline to Week26 were -1.4kg, -3.2kg, and -3.0kg in the placebo, ertugliflozin 5mg, and ertugliflozin 15mg groups, respectively. The difference from placebo (95% CI) for ertugliflozin 5mg was -1.8kg (-2.4, -1.2) and for ertugliflozin15 mg was -1.7kg (-2.2, -1.1).
The mean baseline systolicblood pressure was 129.3 mmHg, 130.5 mmHg, and 130.2 mmHg in the placebo, ertugliflozin5 mg, and ertugliflozin15 mg groups, respectively. The mean changes from baseline to Week26 were -1.8 mmHg, -5.1 mmHg, and -5.7 mmHg in the placebo, ertugliflozin 5mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg groups, respectively. The difference from placebo (95% CI) for ertugliflozin 5mg was -3.3 mmHg (-5.6, -1.1) and forertugliflozin 15 mg was -3.8 mmHg (-6.1, -1.5).
Figure 3: HbA1c (%) Change over Time in a 26-Week Placebo-Controlled Study for Ertugliflozin Used in Combination with Metformin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus*
* Data to the left of the verticalline are observed means (non-model-based) excluding values occurring post glycemic rescue. Data to the right of the vertical line represent the final Week 26 data, including all values regardless of use of glycemic rescue medication and use of study drug, with missing Week 26 values imputed using multiple imputation (26-MI) with a mean equal to the baseline value of the patient (see Table 6).
In Combination With Sitagliptin Versus Ertugliflozin Alone And Sitagliptin Alone, As Add-On To Metformin
A total of 1,233 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequate glycemic control (HbA1c between 7.5% and 11%) on metformin monotherapy (≥1,500 mg/day for ≥8 weeks) participated in a randomized, double-blind, 26-week, active controlled study (NCT02099110) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin 5mg or 15 mg in combination with sitagliptin 100 mg compared to the individual components. Patients were randomized to one of five treatment arms: ertugliflozin 5 mg, ertugliflozin 15 mg, sitagliptin 100 mg, ertugliflozin 5 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg, or ertugliflozin 15 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg.
AtWeek26, ertugliflozin 5 mg or 15 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg provided statistically significantly greater reductions in HbA1ccompared to ertugliflozin(5 mg or15 mg) alone orsitagliptin100 mg alone. The mean change from baseline in HbA1c was -1.4% forertugliflozin5mg or 15 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg versus-1.0%, for ertugliflozin 5mg, ertugliflozin 15mg, or sitagliptin 100mg, respectively. More patients receiving ertugliflozin5 mg or 15 mg + sitagliptin 100 mg achieved an HbA1c <7% (53.3% and 50.9%, for ertugliflozin 5mg or15 mg, respectively, + sitagliptin 100 mg) compared to the individual components (29.3%, 33.7%, and38.5% for ertugliflozin 5 mg, ertugliflozin 15 mg, or sitagliptin 100 mg, respectively).
Ertugliflozin As Add-On Combination Therapy With Metformin and Sitagliptin
Atotal of463 patients with type2diabetes mellitus inadequatelycontrolled (HbA1c between 7% and 10.5%) on metformin (≥1,500 mg/day for ≥8 weeks) and sitagliptin 100 mg once daily participated in a randomized, double-blind, multi-center, 26-week, placebo-controlled study(NCT02036515)to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin. Patients entered a 2-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period and were randomized to placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg, orertugliflozin 15 mg.
At Week26, treatment with ertugliflozin at 5mg or 15 mg daily provided statistically significant reductions in HbA1c. Ertugliflozin also resulted in a higher proportion of patients achieving an HbA1c <7% compared to placebo (see Table 7).
Table 7: Results at Week 26 from an Add-on Study of Ertugliflozin in Combination with Metformin and Sitagliptin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus*
|
Placebo |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg |
| HbA1c (%) |
N = 152 |
N = 155 |
N = 152 |
| Baseline (mean) |
8.0 |
8.1 |
8.0 |
| Change from baseline (LS mean†) |
-0.2 |
-0.7 |
-0.8 |
| Difference from placebo (LS mean†, 95% CI) |
|
-0.5‡
(-0.7, -0.3) |
-0.6‡
(-0.8, -0.4) |
| Patients [N (%)] with HbA1c <7% |
31 (20.2) |
54 (34.6) |
64 (42.3) |
| FPG (mg/dL) |
N = 152 |
N = 156 |
N = 152 |
| Baseline (mean) |
169.6 |
167.7 |
171.7 |
| Change from baseline (LS mean†) |
-6.5 |
-25.7 |
-32.1 |
| Difference from placebo (LS mean†, 95% CI) |
|
-19.2‡
(-26.8, -11.6) |
-25.6‡
(-33.2, -18.0) |
* N includes all randomized and treated patients with a baseline measurement of the outcome variable. At Week26, the primary HbA1c endpoint was missing for 10%, 11%, and 7% of patients and during the trial, rescue medication was initiated by 16%, 1%, and 2% of patients randomized to placebo, ertugliflozin 5mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg, respectively. Missing Week26 measurements were imputed using multiple imputation with a mean equal to the baseline value of the patient. Results include measurements collected after initiation of rescue medication. For those patients who did not receive rescue medication and had values measured at 26 weeks, the mean changes from baseline for HbA1c were -0.2%, -0.8%, and -0.9% for placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg, respectively.
† Intent-to-treat analysis using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline value, prior antihyperglycemic medication and baseline eGFR.
‡p<0.001 compared to placebo. |
The mean baseline body weight was 86.5 kg, 87.6 kg, and 86.6 kg in the placebo, ertugliflozin5 mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg groups, respectively. The mean changes from baseline to Week26 were -1.0kg, -3.0kg, and -2.8kg in the placebo, ertugliflozin 5mg, and ertugliflozin 15mg groups, respectively. The difference from placebo (95% CI) for ertugliflozin 5mg was -1.9kg (-2.6, -1.3) and for ertugliflozin15 mg was -1.8kg (-2.4, -1.2).
The mean baseline systolic blood pressure was 130.2 mmHg, 132.1 mmHg, and 131.6 mmHg in the placebo, ertugliflozin5 mg, and ertugliflozin15 mg groups, respectively. The mean changes from baseline to Week26 were -0.2 mmHg, -3.8 mmHg, and -4.5 mmHg in the placebo, ertugliflozin 5mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg groups, respectively. The difference from placebo (95% CI) for ertugliflozin 5mg was -3.7 mmHg (-6.1, -1.2) and forertugliflozin 15 mg was -4.3 mmHg (-6.7, -1.9).
Active Controlled Study Of Ertugliflozin Versus Glimepiride As Add-On Combination Therapy With Metformin
A total of1,326 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled (HbA1c between 7% and 9%) on metformin monotherapy participated in a randomized, double-blind, multi-center, 52-week, active comparator-controlled study (NCT01999218) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin in combination with metformin. These patients, who were receiving metformin monotherapy (≥1,500 mg/day for≥8 weeks), entered a 2-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period and were randomized to glimepiride, ertugliflozin 5mg, or ertugliflozin 15 mg administered once daily in addition to continuation of background metformin therapy. Glimepiride was initiated at 1 mg/day and titrated up to a maximum dose of 6 or 8mg/day (depending on maximum approved dose in each country) or a maximum tolerated dose or down-titrated to avoid ormanage hypoglycemia. The mean dailydose of glimepiride was 3.0 mg.
Ertugliflozin 15 mg was non-inferior to glimepiride after 52 weeks of treatment. (See Table8.)
Table 8: Results at Week 52 from an Active-Controlled Study Comparing Ertugliflozin to Glimepiride as Add-on Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled on Metformin*
|
Glimepiride |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg |
| HbA1c (%) |
N = 437 |
N = 447 |
N = 440 |
| Baseline (mean) |
7.8 |
7.8 |
7.8 |
| Change from baseline (LS mean†) |
-0.6 |
-0.5 |
-0.5 |
| Difference from glimepiride (LS mean†, 95% CI) |
|
0.2‡
(0.0, 0.3) |
0.1‡
(-0.0, 0.2) |
| Patients [N (%)] with HbA1c <7% |
208 (47.7) |
177 (39.5) |
186 (42.2) |
* Nincludes all randomized and treated patients with a baseline measurement of the outcome variable. At Week 52, the primary HbA1c endpoint was missing for 15%, 20%, and 16% of patients and during the trial, rescue medication was initiated by 3%, 6%, and 4% of patients randomized to glimepiride, ertugliflozin 5 mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg, respectively. Missing Week52 measurements were imputed using multiple imputation with a mean equal to the baseline value of the patient. Results include measurements collected after initiation of rescue medication. For those patients who did not receive rescue medication and had values measured at 52 weeks, the mean changes from baseline for HbA1c were -0.8%, -0.6%, and -0.7% for glimepiride, ertugliflozin 5 mg, and ertugliflozin15 mg, respectively.
† Intent-to-treat analysis using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline value, prior antihyperglycemic medication and baseline eGFR.
‡Non-inferiorityis declared when the upper bound of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the mean difference is less than 0.3%. |
The mean baseline body weight was 86.8 kg, 87.9kg, and 85.6 kg in the glimepiride, ertugliflozin 5mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg groups, respectively. The mean changes from baseline to Week52 were 0.6kg, -2.6 kg, and -3.0kg in the glimepiride, ertugliflozin 5mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg groups, respectively. The difference from glimepiride (95% CI) for ertugliflozin 5 mg was -3.2kg (-3.7, -2.7) and for ertugliflozin 15 mg was -3.6 kg (-4.1, -3.1).
Ertugliflozinas Add-On Combination Therapy With Insulin (With Or Without Metformin)
In an 18-week randomized, double-blind, multi-center, placebo-controlled, glycemic sub-study of VERTIS CV (NCT01986881, study details see 14.2), a total of1065 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with inadequate glycemic control (HbA1c between 7% and 10.5%) on background therapy of insulin ≥20 units/day (59% also on metformin ≥1,500 mg/day) were randomized to placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg or ertugliflozin 15 mg once daily treatment.
At Week 18, treatment with ertugliflozin at 5mg or 15 mg daily provided statistically significant reductions in HbA1c compared to placebo (see Table 9).
Table 9: Results at Week 18 from an Add-on Study of Ertugliflozin in Combination with Insulin (with or without Metformin) in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus*
|
Placebo |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg |
| HbA1c (%) |
N = 346 |
N = 346 |
N = 367 |
| Baseline (mean) |
8.4 |
8.4 |
8.4 |
| Change from baseline (LS mean†, SE) |
-0.2 (0.05) |
-0.7 (0.05) |
-0.7 (0.05) |
| Difference from placebo (LS mean†, 95% CI) |
|
-0.5‡
(-0.6, -0.4) |
-0.5‡
(-0.7, -0.4) |
| Patients [N (%)] with HbA1c <7%§ |
37 (10.7) |
79 (22.8) |
81 (22.1) |
| FPG (mg/dL) |
N = 343 |
N = 346 |
N = 368 |
| Baseline (mean) |
167.4 |
173.8 |
175.4 |
| Change from baseline (LS mean†, SE) |
-6.3 (2.91) |
-25.6 (2.90) |
-29.8 (2.86) |
| Difference from placebo (LS mean†, 95% CI) |
|
-19.2‡
(-26.8, -11.6) |
-23.4‡
(-30.9, -16.0) |
* N includes all randomized and treated patients with a baseline measurement of the outcome variable. At Week18, the primary HbA1c endpoint was missing for 10%, 9%, and 12% of patients and during the trial, rescue medication was initiated by 12%, 7%, and 6% of patients randomized to placebo, ertugliflozin 5mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg, respectively. Results include measurements collected after initiation of rescue medication. Prior to Week 18, background antidiabetic medication was held stable. Missing Week 18measurements were imputed using multiple imputation with a mean equal to the baseline value of the patient (Return to Baseline analysis).
† Intent-to-treat analysis using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline value, insulin stratum, and baseline eGFR.
‡p<0.001 compared to placebo.
§ Missing values imputed as not meeting the <7% criterion.
SE: standard error. |
The mean baseline body weights were 93.3 kg, 93.8 kg, and 92.1 kg in the placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg, and ertugliflozin 15mg groups, respectively. The mean changes from baseline to Week 18 were -0.2kg, -1.6 kg, and -1.9 kg in the placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg groups, respectively. The differences from placebo (95% CI) forertugliflozin5 mg were-1.4 kg (-1.9, -0.9) and forertugliflozin15 mg was -1.6 kg(-2.1, -1.1).
The mean baseline systolic blood pressures were 134.0 mmHg, 135.6 mmHg, and 133.7 mmHg in the placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg groups, respectively. The mean changes from baseline to Week 18 were 0.7 mmHg, -2.2 mmHg, and -1.7 mmHg in the placebo, ertugliflozin5 mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg groups, respectively. The differences from placebo (95% CI) for ertugliflozin 5mg was –2.9 mmHg (-4.9, -1.0) and for ertugliflozin 15 mg were -2.5 mmHg (-4.4, -0.5).
Add-On Combination Therapy With Metformin And Sulfonylurea
In an 18-week randomized, double-blind, multi-center, placebo-controlled, glycemic sub-study of VERTIS CV (NCT01986881, study details see 14.2), a total of330 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with inadequate glycemic control (HbA1cbetween 7% and 10.5%) with background therapy of metformin ≥1,500 mg/day and a sulfonylurea (SU) were randomized to placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg or ertugliflozin 15 mg once daily treatment.
At Week 18, treatment with ertugliflozin at 5mg or 15 mg daily provided statistically significant reductions in HbA1c compared to placebo (see Table 10).
Table 10: Results at Week 18 from an Add-on Study of Ertugliflozin in Combination with Metformin and a SU in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus*
|
Placebo |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg |
| HbA1c (%) |
N = 116 |
N = 99 |
N = 113 |
| Baseline (mean) |
8.3 |
8.4 |
8.3 |
| Change from baseline (LS mean† SE) |
-0.3 (0.08) |
-0.8 (0.09) |
-0.9 (0.08) |
| Difference from placebo (LS mean†, 95%CI) |
|
-0.6‡
(-0.8, -0.3) |
-0.7‡
(-0.9, -0.4) |
| Patients [N (%)] with HbA1c <7%§ |
17 (14.7) |
39 (39.4) |
38 (33.6) |
| FPG (mg/dL) |
N = 117 |
N = 99 |
N = 113 |
| Baseline (mean) |
177.3 |
183.5 |
174.0 |
| Change from baseline (LS mean † SE) |
-3.5 (3.65) |
-31.3 (3.87) |
-33.0 (3.67) |
| Difference from placebo (LS mean†, 95% CI) |
|
-27.9‡
(-37.8, -17.9) |
-29.5‡
(-39.0, -19.9) |
* N includes all randomized and treated patients with a baseline measurement of the outcome variable. At Week18, the primary HbA1c endpoint was missing for9%, 8%, and6% of patients and during the trial, rescue medication was initiated by 10%, 7%, and 3% of patients randomized to placebo, ertugliflozin 5mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg, respectively. Results include measurements collected after initiation of rescue medication. Missing Week 18 measurements were imputed using multiple imputation with a mean equal to the baseline value of the patient (Return to Baseline analysis).
† Intent-to-treat analysis using ANCOVA adjusted for baseline value and baseline eGFR.
‡p<0.001 compared to placebo.
§ Missing values imputed as not meeting the <7% criterion.
SE: standard error |
The mean baseline body weights were 90.5 kg, 92.1 kg, and 92.9 kg in the placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg groups, respectively. The mean changes from baseline to Week 18 were -0.6kg, -2.0kg, and -2.2 kg in the placebo, ertugliflozin5 mg, and ertugliflozin15 mg groups, respectively. The differences from placebo (95% CI) for ertugliflozin 5mg were -1.4kg (-2.2, -0.7) and for ertugliflozin 15 mg was -1.6kg (-2.3, -0.9).
Ertugliflozin Cardiovascular Outcomes In Patients With Type 2 Diabetes And Established Cardiovascular Disease
The effect of ertugliflozin on cardiovascular risk in adult patients with type2 diabetes and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease was evaluated in the VERTIS CV study (NCT 01986881), a multicenter, multi-national, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, event-driven trial. The study compared the risk of experiencing a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) between ertugliflozin and placebo when these were added to and used concomitantly with standard of care treatments for diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
A total of 8246 patients were randomized (placebo N=2747, ertugliflozin 5 mg N=2752, ertugliflozin 15 mg N=2747) and followed for a median of 3 years. Approximately 88% of the study population was Caucasian, 6% Asian, and 3% Black. The mean age was 64 years and approximately 70% were male.
All patients in the study had inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus at baseline (HbA1c greater than or equal to 7%). The mean duration of type 2 diabetes mellitus was 13 years, the mean HbA1c atbaseline was 8.2% and the mean eGFR was 76 mL/min/1.73m². Atbaseline, patients were treated with one (32%) or more (67%) antidiabetic medications including biguanides (metformin) (76%), insulin (47%), sulfonylureas (41%), DPP-4 inhibitors (11%) and GLP-1 receptor agonists (3%).
Almost all patients (99%) had established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease at baseline including: a documented history of coronary artery disease (76%), cerebrovascular disease (23%) or peripheral artery disease (19%). Approximately 24% patients had a history of heart failure (HF). At baseline, the mean systolic blood pressure was 133 mmHg, the mean diastolic blood pressure was 77 mmHg, the mean LDL was 89 mg/dL, and the mean HDL was 44 mg/dL. At baseline, approximately 81% of patients were treated with renin angiotensin system inhibitors, 69% with beta-blockers, 43% with diuretics, 82% with statins, 4% ezetimibe, and 89% with antiplatelet agents.
The primary endpoint in VERTIS CV was the time to first occurrence of a Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE). A major adverse cardiovascular event was defined as occurrence of either a cardiovascular death or a nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) or a nonfatal stroke. The statistical analysis plan pre-specified that the 5 and 15 mg doses would be combined for the analysis. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to test for non-inferiority against the pre-specified risk margin of 1.3 for the hazard ratio of MACE. Type-1 error was controlled across multiple tests using a hierarchical testing strategy.
The incidence rate of MACE was similar between the ertugliflozin-treated and placebo-treated patients. The estimated hazard ratio of MACE associated with ertugliflozin relative to placebo was 0.97 with 95.6% confidence interval (0.85, 1.11). The upper bound of this confidence interval excluded a risk larger than 1.3 (Table 11). Results for the 5 mg and 15 mg doses were consistent with results for the combined dose group.
Table 11: Analysis of MACE and its Components from the VERTIS-CV Study*
| Endpoint* |
Placebo
(N=2747) |
ertugliflozin
(N=5499) |
Hazard Ratio vs Placebo (CI)‡ |
| N (%) |
Event Rate (per 100 person-years) |
N (%) |
Event Rate (per 100 person-years) |
| MACE (CV death, non-fatal MI, or non-fatal stroke) Composite |
327 (11.9) |
4.0 |
653 (11.9) |
3.9 |
0.97
(0.85, 1.11) |
| Components of Composite Endpoint |
| Non-fatal MI |
148 (5.4) |
1.6 |
310 (5.6) |
1.7 |
1.04
(0.86, 1.27) |
| Non-fatal Stroke |
78 (2.8) |
0.8 |
157 (2.9) |
0.8 |
1.00
(0.76, 1.32) |
| CV death |
184 (6.7) |
1.9 |
341 (6.2) |
1.8 |
0.92
(0.77, 1.11) |
N=Number of patients, CI=Confidence interval, CV=Cardiovascular, MI=Myocardial infarction.
* Intent-to-treat analysis set.
†MACE was evaluated in subjects who took at least one dose of study medication and, for subjects who discontinued study medication prior to the end of the study, censored events that occurred more than 365 days after the last dose of study medication. Other endpoints were evaluated using all randomized subjects and events that occurred any time after the first dose of study medication until the last contact date. The total number of first events was analyzed fo reach endpoint.
‡HR and CI are based on Cox proportional hazards regression model, stratified by cohorts. For MACE a 95.6% CI is presented, for other endpoints a 95% CI is presented. |