CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism Of Action
Edoxaban is a selective
inhibitor of FXa. It does not require antithrombin III for antithrombotic
activity. Edoxaban inhibits free FXa, and prothrombinase activity and inhibits
thrombin-induced platelet aggregation. Inhibition of FXa in the coagulation
cascade reduces thrombin generation and reduces thrombus formation.
Pharmacodynamics
As a result of FXa inhibition,
edoxaban prolongs clotting time tests such as prothrombin time (PT), and
activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Changes observed in PT, INR, and
aPTT at the expected therapeutic dose, however, are small, subject to a high
degree of variability and not useful in monitoring the anticoagulant effect of
edoxaban. Following oral administration, peak pharmacodynamic effects are
observed within 1-2 hours, which correspond with peak edoxaban concentrations
(Cmax).
Cardiac Electrophysiology
In a thorough QT study in healthy men and women aged
19-45 years, no QTc interval prolongation was observed with edoxaban (90 mg and
180 mg).
Effect Of PCCs On Pharmacodynamics Of SAVAYSA
There is no systematic evaluation of bleeding reversal by
4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) products in patients who have
received SAVAYSA.
Effects of PCC (50 IU/kg) on the pharmacodynamics of edoxaban
were studied in healthy subjects following a punch biopsy. Following
administration of a single dose of edoxaban, endogenous thrombin potential
(ETP) returned to pre-edoxaban baseline levels in 0.5 hours after the
initiation of a 15 minute infusion of 50 IU/kg PCC, compared to more than 24
hours with placebo. Mean ETP levels continued to increase and exceeded
pre-edoxaban baseline, reaching maximum elevations (~40% over pre-edoxaban
levels) at 22 hours after initiating PCC dose, which was the last observation
of ETP. The clinical relevance of this ETP increase is unknown.
Pharmacodynamic Interactions
Aspirin
Co-administration of aspirin (100 mg or 325 mg) and
edoxaban increased bleeding time relative to that seen with either drug alone.
NSAID (Naproxen)
Co-administration of naproxen (500 mg) and edoxaban
increased bleeding time relative to that seen with either drug alone.
Pharmacokinetics
Edoxaban displays approximately dose-proportional
pharmacokinetics for doses of 15 to 150 mg and 60 to 120 mg following single
and repeat doses, respectively, in healthy subjects.
Absorption
Following oral administration, peak plasma edoxaban
concentrations are observed within 1-2 hours. Absolute bioavailability is 62%.
Food does not affect total systemic exposure to edoxaban. SAVAYSA was
administered with or without food in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 and Hokusai VTE
trials.
Administration of a crushed 60 mg tablet, either mixed
into applesauce or suspended in water and given through a nasogastric tube,
showed similar exposure compared to administration of an intact tablet.
Distribution
Disposition is biphasic. The steady-state volume of
distribution (Vdss) is 107 (19.9) L [mean (SD)]. In vitro plasma protein
binding is approximately 55%. There is no clinically relevant accumulation of
edoxaban (accumulation ratio 1.14) with once daily dosing.
Steady-state concentrations are achieved within 3 days.
Metabolism
Unchanged edoxaban is the predominant form in plasma.
There is minimal metabolism via hydrolysis (mediated by carboxylesterase 1),
conjugation, and oxidation by CYP3A4.
The predominant metabolite M-4, formed by hydrolysis, is
human-specific and active and reaches less than 10% of the exposure of the
parent compound in healthy subjects. Exposure to the other metabolites is less
than 5% of exposure to edoxaban.
Elimination
Edoxaban is eliminated primarily as unchanged drug in the
urine. Renal clearance (11 L/hour) accounts for approximately 50% of the total
clearance of edoxaban (22 L/hour). Metabolism and biliary/intestinal excretion
account for the remaining clearance. The terminal elimination half-life of
edoxaban following oral administration is 10 to 14 hours.
Specific Populations
Hepatic Impairment
In a dedicated pharmacokinetic study, patients with mild
or moderate hepatic impairment (classified as Child-Pugh A or Child-Pugh B)
exhibited similar pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics to their matched
healthy control group. There is no clinical experience with edoxaban in
patients with severe hepatic impairment [see Use In Specific Populations].
Renal Impairment
In a dedicated pharmacokinetic study, total systemic
exposure to edoxaban for subjects with CrCL > 50 to < 80 mL/min, CrCL 30
to 50 mL/min, CrCL < 30 mL/min, or undergoing peritoneal dialysis, were
increased by 32%, 74%, 72%, and 93%, respectively, relative to subjects with
CrCL ≥ 80 mL/min [see Use In Specific Populations].
Hemodialysis
A 4-hour hemodialysis session reduced total edoxaban
exposure by less than 7%.
Age
In a population pharmacokinetic analysis, after taking
renal function and body weight into account, age had no additional clinically
significant effect on edoxaban pharmacokinetics.
Weight
In a population pharmacokinetic analysis, total exposure
in patients with median low body weight (55 kg) was increased by 13% as
compared with patients with median high body weight (84 kg).
Gender
In a population pharmacokinetic analysis, after
accounting for body weight, gender had no additional clinically significant
effect on edoxaban pharmacokinetics.
Race
In a population pharmacokinetic analysis, edoxaban
exposures in Asian patients and non-Asian patients were similar.
Drug Interactions
In vitro Drug Interactions Studies
In vitro studies indicate that edoxaban does not inhibit
the major cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP1A2, 2A6, 2B6, 2C8/9, 2C19, 2D6, 2E1, or
3A4) and does not induce CYP1A2, CYP3A4 or the P-gp transporter (MDR1). In
vitro data also indicate that edoxaban does not inhibit the following
transporters at clinically relevant concentrations: P-gp, the organic anion
transporters OAT1 or OAT3; the organic cation transporters OCT1 or OCT2; or the
organic ion transporting polypeptides OATP1B1 or OATP1B3. Edoxaban is a
substrate of P-gp transporter.
Impact Of Other Drugs On SAVAYSA
The effect of co-administered amiodarone, cyclosporine,
dronedarone, erythromycin, ketoconazole, quinidine, verapamil, and rifampin on
edoxaban exposure is shown in Figure 12.1.
Figure 12.1: Summary of Drug Interaction Study Results
Impact Of Edoxaban On Other Drugs
Edoxaban increased the Cmax of concomitantly administered
digoxin by 28%; however, the AUC was not affected. Edoxaban had no effect on
the Cmax and AUC of quinidine.
Edoxaban decreased the Cmax and AUC of concomitantly
administered verapamil by 14% and 16%, respectively.
Clinical Studies
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation
The ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Study
The ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 study was a multi-national,
double-blind, non-inferiority study comparing the efficacy and safety of two
SAVAYSA treatment arms (60 mg and 30 mg) to warfarin (titrated to INR 2.0 to
3.0) in reducing the risk of stroke and systemic embolic events in patients
with NVAF. The non-inferiority margin (degree of inferiority of SAVAYSA to
warfarin that was to be ruled out) was set at 38%, reflecting the substantial
effect of warfarin in reducing strokes. The primary analysis included both
ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes.
To enter the study, patients had to have one or more of
the following additional risk factors for stroke:
- a prior stroke (ischemic or unknown type), transient
ischemic attack (TIA) or non-CNS systemic embolism, or
- 2 or more of the following risk factors:
- age ≥ 75 years,
- hypertension,
- heart failure, or
- diabetes mellitus
A total of 21,105 patients were randomized and followed
for a median of 2.8 years and treated for a median of 2.5 years. Patients in
the SAVAYSA treatment arms had their dose halved (60 mg halved to 30 mg or 30
mg halved to 15 mg) if one or more of the following clinical factors were
present: CrCL ≤ 50 mL/min, low body weight (≤ 60 kg) or concomitant
use of specific P-gp inhibitors (verapamil, quinidine, dronedarone). Patients
on antiretroviral therapy (ritonavir, nelfinavir, indinavir, saquinavir) as
well as cyclosporine were excluded from the study. Approximately 25% of
patients in all treatment groups received a reduced dose at baseline, and an
additional 7% were dose-reduced during the study. The most common reason for
dose reduction was a CrCL ≤ 50 mL/min at randomization (19% of patients).
Patients were well balanced with respect to demographic
and baseline characteristics. The percentages of patients age ≥ 75 years
and ≥ 80 years were approximately 40% and 17%, respectively. The majority
of patients were Caucasian (81%) and male (62%). Approximately 40% of patients
had not taken a Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA) (i.e., never took a VKA or had not
taken a VKA for more than 2 months).
The mean patient body weight was 84 kg (185 lbs) and 10%
of patients had a body weight of ≤ 60 kg. Concomitant diseases of
patients in this study included hypertension (94%), congestive heart failure
(58%), and prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (28%). At baseline,
approximately 30% of patients were on aspirin and approximately 2% of patients
were taking a thienopyridine.
Patients randomized to the warfarin arm achieved a mean
TTR (time in therapeutic range, INR 2.0 to 3.0) of 65% during the course of the
study.
The primary endpoint of the study was the occurrence of
first stroke (either ischemic or hemorrhagic) or of a systemic embolic event
(SEE) that occurred during treatment or within 3 days from the last dose taken.
In the overall results of the study, shown in Table 14.1, both treatment arms
of SAVAYSA were non-inferior to warfarin for the primary efficacy endpoint of
stroke or SEE. However, the 30 mg (15 mg dose-reduced) treatment arm was
numerically less effective than warfarin for the primary endpoint, and was also
markedly inferior in reducing the rate of ischemic stroke. Based on the planned
superiority analysis (ITT, which required p < 0.01 for success), statistical
superiority of the 60 mg (30 mg dose-reduced) treatment arm compared to
warfarin was not established in the total study population, but there was a
favorable trend [HR (99% CI): 0.87 (0.71, 1.07)].
Table 14.1: Strokes and Systemic Embolic Events in the
ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Study (mITT, on Treatmenta)
Events |
SAVAYSA 30 mgb
(N=7002) n (%/yr)c |
SAVAYSA 60 mgb
(N=7012) n (%/yr)c |
Warfarin
(N=7012) n (%/yr)c |
SAVAYSA 30 mg vs. warfarin HR (CI)d p-value |
SAVAYSA 60 mg vs. warfarin HR (CI)d p-value |
First Stroke or SEE |
253 (1.6) |
182 (1.2) |
232 (1.5) |
1.07
(0.87, 1.31) p=0.44 |
0.79
(0.63, 0.99) p=0.017 |
Ischemic Stroke |
225 (1.4) |
135 (0.9) |
144 (0.9) |
1.54
(1.25, 1.90) |
0.94
(0.75, 1.19) |
Hemorrhagic Stroke |
18 (0.1) |
39 (0.3) |
75 (0.5) |
0.24
(0.14, 0.39) |
0.52
(0.36, 0.77) |
Systemic Embolism |
10 (<0.1) |
8 (<0.1) |
13 (<0.1) |
0.75
(0.33, 1.72) |
0.62
(0.26, 1.50) |
Abbreviations: HR = Hazard Ratio versus Warfarin, CI =
Confidence Interval, n = number of events, mITT = Modified Intent-to-Treat,
N=number of patients in mITT population, SEE = Systemic Embolic Event, yr =
year.
a Includes events during treatment or within 3 days of stopping
study treatment
b Includes patients dose-reduced to 15 mg for the 30 mg treatment
group and 30 mg for the 60 mg treatment group
c The event rate (%/yr) is calculated as number of
events/subject-year exposure.
d 97.5% CI for primary endpoint of First Stroke or SEE. 95% CI for
Ischemic Stroke, Hemorrhagic Stroke or Systemic Embolism |
Figure 14.1 is a plot of the time from randomization to
the occurrence of the first primary endpoint in all patients randomized to 60
mg SAVAYSA or warfarin.
Figure 14.1: Kaplan-Meier Cumulative Event Rate
Estimates for Primary Endpoint (first occurrence of
stroke or SEE) (mITT*)
The incidence rate of the
primary endpoint of stroke or SEE in patients (N=1776) treated with the 30 mg
reduced dose of SAVAYSA because of a CrCL level ≤ 50 mL/min, low body
weight ≤ 60 kg, or the concomitant use of a P-gp inhibitor drug, was
1.79% per year. Patients with any of these characteristics who were randomized
to receive warfarin had an incidence rate of the primary endpoint of 2.21% per
year [HR (95% CI): 0.81 (0.58, 1.13)].
In all randomized patients
during the overall study period, the rates of CV death with SAVAYSA and
warfarin were 2.74% per year vs. 3.17% per year, respectively [HR (95% CI):
0.86 (0.77, 0.97)].
The results in the ENGAGE
AF-TIMI 48 study for the primary efficacy endpoint for most major subgroups are
displayed in Figure 14.2.
Figure 14.2: ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Study: Primary Efficacy
Endpoint by Subgroups (ITT Analysis Set)
Note: The figure above presents
effects in various subgroups all of which are baseline characteristics and most
of which were pre-specified. The 95% confidence limits that are shown do not
take into account how many comparisons were made, nor do they reflect the
effect of a particular factor after adjustment for all other factors. Apparent
homogeneity or heterogeneity among groups should not be over-interpreted.
The results of the ENGAGE
AF-TIMI 48 study show a strong relationship between the blood levels of
edoxaban and its effectiveness in reducing the rate of ischemic stroke. There
was a 64% increase in the ischemic stroke rate in patients in the 30 mg
treatment arm (including patients with dose reduced to 15 mg) compared to the
60 mg treatment arm (including patients with dose reduced to 30 mg).
Approximately half of the SAVAYSA dose is eliminated by the kidney, and
edoxaban blood levels are lower in patients with better renal function,
averaging about 30% less in patients with CrCL of > 80 mL/min, and 40% less
in patients with CrCL > 95 mL/min when compared to patients with a CrCL of
> 50 to ≤ 80 mL/min. Given the clear relationship of dose and blood
levels to effectiveness in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 study, it could be anticipated
that patients with better renal function would show a smaller effect of SAVAYSA
compared to warfarin than would patients with mildly impaired renal function,
and this was in fact observed.
Table 14.2 shows the results
for the study primary efficacy endpoint of first stroke or SEE as well as the
effects on ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke in the pre-randomization CrCL
subgroups for SAVAYSA 60 mg (including 30 mg dose-reduced) and warfarin. There
was a decreased rate of ischemic stroke with SAVAYSA 60 mg compared to warfarin
in patients with CrCL > 50 to ≤80 mL/min [HR (95% CI): 0.63 (0.44,
0.89)]. In patients with CrCL > 80 to ≤ 95 mL/min the results for ischemic
stroke slightly favor warfarin with a confidence interval that crosses 1.0 [HR
(95% CI): 1.11 (0.58, 2.12)]. The rate of ischemic stroke was higher relative
to warfarin in the patients with CrCL > 95 mL/min [HR (95% CI): 2.16 (1.17,
3.97)]. Pharmacokinetic data indicate that patients with CrCL > 95 mL/min
had lower plasma edoxaban levels, along with a lower rate of bleeding relative
to warfarin than patients with CrCL ≤ 95 mL/min. Consequently, SAVAYSA
should not be used in patients with CrCL > 95 mL/min [see DOSAGE AND
ADMINISTRATION, WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS, ADVERSE REACTIONS,
and CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY].
In patients with CrCL ≤
95 mL/min, the SAVAYSA 60 mg (30 mg dose-reduced) treatment arm reduced the
risk of stroke or SEE when compared to warfarin [HR (95% CI): 0.68 (0.55,
0.84)].
In the indicated population
(CrCL ≤ 95 mL/min), during the overall study period, the rates of CV
death with SAVAYSA and warfarin were 2.95% per year vs. 3.59% per year,
respectively [HR (95% CI): 0.82 (0.72, 0.93)].
Table 14.2: Primary Endpoint, Ischemic and Hemorrhagic
Stroke Results in as a Function of Baseline Creatinine Clearance (mITT
Population, On Treatment)
STROKE TYPE
Renal Function Subgroupsa |
Treatment Arm |
n (N) |
Event Rate (%/yr) |
SAVAYSA 60 mg vs. Warfarin HR (95% CI) |
PRIMARY ENDPOINT (STROKE/SEE) |
≤ 95 (Indicated Population) |
Warfarin |
211 (5485) |
1.8 |
0.68 (0.55, 0.84) |
SAVAYSA 60 mg |
142 (5417) |
1.2 |
≤50b |
Warfarin |
50 (1356) |
2.0 |
0.90 (0.60, 1.34) |
SAVAYSA 60 mg |
45 (1372) |
1.8 |
> 50 to ≤80 |
Warfarin |
135 (3053) |
2.0 |
0.53 (0.40, 0.70) |
SAVAYSA 60 mg |
71 (3020) |
1.1 |
> 80 to ≤95 |
Warfarin |
26 (1076) |
1.0 |
1.05 (0.61, 1.82) |
SAVAYSA 60 mg |
26 (1025) |
1.1 |
> 95* |
Warfarin |
21 (1527) |
0.6 |
1.87 (1.10, 3.17) |
SAVAYSA 60 mg |
40 (1595) |
1.0 |
ISCHEMIC STROKE |
≤95 (Indicated Population) |
Warfarin |
129 (5485) |
1.1 |
0.80 (0.62, 1.04) |
SAVAYSA 60 mg |
102 (5417) |
0.9 |
≤50b |
Warfarin |
28 (1356) |
1.1 |
1.11 (0.66, 1.84) |
SAVAYSA 60 mg |
31 (1372) |
1.2 |
> 50 to ≤80 |
Warfarin |
83 (3053) |
1.2 |
0.63 (0.44, 0.89) |
SAVAYSA 60 mg |
52 (3020) |
0.8 |
> 80 to ≤ 95 |
Warfarin |
18 (1076) |
0.7 |
1.11 (0.58, 2.12) |
SAVAYSA 60 mg |
19 (1025) |
0.8 |
> 95* |
Warfarin |
15 (1527) |
0.4 |
2.16 (1.17, 3.97) |
SAVAYSA 60 mg |
33 (1595) |
0.9 |
HEMORRHAGIC STROKE |
≤ 95 (Indicated Population) |
Warfarin |
70 (5485) |
0.6 |
0.50 (0.33, 0.75) |
SAVAYSA 60 mg |
34 (5417) |
0.3 |
≤ 50b |
Warfarin |
18 (1356) |
0.7 |
0.66 (0.32, 1.36) |
SAVAYSA 60 mg |
12 (1372) |
0.5 |
> 50 to ≤80 |
Warfarin |
45 (3053) |
0.7 |
0.38 (0.22, 0.67) |
SAVAYSA 60 mg |
17 (3020) |
0.3 |
> 80 to ≤95 |
Warfarin |
7 (1076) |
0.3 |
0.76 (0.24, 2.38) |
SAVAYSA 60 mg |
5(1025) |
0.2 |
> 95* |
Warfarin |
6(1527) |
0.2 |
0.98 (0.31, 3.05) |
SAVAYSA 60 mg |
6 (1595) |
0.2 |
Abbreviations: HR = Hazard Ratio versus Warfarin, CI =
Confidence Interval, n = number of events, mITT = Modified Intent-to-Treat,
N=number of patients in mITT population, yr = year.
* See Boxed Warning
a Renal function subgroups are based on estimated creatinine
clearance in mL/min calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula.
b 83% of patients with pre-randomization CrCL ≤ 50 mL/min in
the SAVAYSA 60 mg group were dose-reduced and consequently received SAVAYSA 30
mg daily. All patients in the warfarin group with CrCL ≤ 50 mL/min were
treated in the same way as those with higher levels of CrCL. |
Transition To Other Anticoagulants In The ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Study
In the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 study,
the schemes for transitioning from study medication to open-label warfarin at
the end of study were associated with similar rates of stroke and systemic
embolism in the SAVAYSA 60 mg and warfarin groups [see DOSAGE AND
ADMINISTRATION]. In the SAVAYSA 60 mg group 7 (0.2%) of 4529 patients had a
stroke or SEE compared to 7 (0.2%) of 4506 patients in the warfarin arm.
Treatment Of Deep Vein Thrombosis And Pulmonary Embolism
The Hokusai VTE Study
SAVAYSA for the treatment of patients with deep vein
thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) was studied in a multi-national,
double-blind study (Hokusai VTE) which compared the efficacy and safety of
SAVAYSA 60 mg orally once daily to warfarin (titrated to INR 2.0 to 3.0) in
patients with acute symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) (DVT or PE with or
without DVT). All patients had VTE confirmed by appropriate diagnostic imaging
at baseline and received initial heparin therapy with low molecular weight
heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin for at least 5 days [median
LMWH/heparin treatment in the SAVAYSA 60 mg group was 7 days, and in the
warfarin group it was 8.0 days] and until INR (sham or real) was ≥ 2.0 on
two measurements. Blinded drug treatment in the warfarin arm was started
concurrently with initial heparin therapy and in the SAVAYSA arm after
discontinuation of initial heparin. Patients randomized to SAVAYSA received 30
mg once daily if they met one or more of the following criteria: CrCL 30 to 50
mL/min, body weight ≤ 60 kg, or concomitant use of specific P-gp
inhibitors (verapamil and quinidine or the short-term concomitant administration
of azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin, oral itraconazole or oral
ketoconazole). The edoxaban dosage regimen was to be returned to the regular
dosage of 60 mg once daily at any time the subject is not taking the
concomitant medication provided no other criteria for dose reduction are met.
Other P-gp inhibitors were not permitted in the study. Patients on
antiretroviral therapy (ritonavir, nelfinavir, indinavir, saquinavir) as well
as cyclosporine were excluded from the Hokusai VTE study. The concomitant use
of these drugs with SAVAYSA has not been studied in patients. The treatment
duration was from 3 months up to 12 months, determined by investigator based on
patient clinical features. Patients were excluded if they required thrombectomy,
insertion of a caval filter, use of a fibrinolytic agent, or use of other P-gp
inhibitors, had a creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min, significant liver
disease, or active bleeding. The primary efficacy outcome was symptomatic VTE,
defined as the composite of recurrent DVT, new non-fatal symptomatic PE, and
fatal PE during the 12-month study period.
A total of 8292 patients were randomized to receive
SAVAYSA or warfarin and were followed for a mean treatment duration of 252 days
for SAVAYSA and 250 days for warfarin. The mean age was approximately 56 years.
The population was 57% male, 70% Caucasian, 21% Asian, and about 4% Black. The
presenting diagnosis was PE (with or without DVT) in 40.7% and DVT only in
59.3% of patients. At baseline, 27.6% of patients had temporary risk factors
only (e.g., trauma, surgery, immobilization, estrogen therapy). Overall 9.4%
had a history of cancer, 17.3% of the patients had an age ≥ 75 years
and/or a body weight ≤ 50 kg, and/or a CrCL < 50 mL/min, and 31.4% of
patients had NT-ProBNP ≥ 500 pg/mL.
Aspirin was taken as on treatment concomitant
antithrombotic medication by approximately 9% of patients in both groups.
In the warfarin group, the median TTR (time in
therapeutic range, INR 2.0 to 3.0) was 65.6%.
A total of 8240 patients (n= 4118 for SAVAYSA and n =
4122 for warfarin) received study drug and were included in the modified
intent-to-treat (mITT) population. SAVAYSA was demonstrated to be non-inferior
to warfarin for the primary endpoint of recurrent VTE [HR (95% CI): 0.89 (0.70,
1.13)] (Table 14.3, Figure 14.3).
Table 14.3: Primary Composite Efficacy Endpoint
Results in Hokusai VTE (mITT Overall Study Period)
Primary Endpoint |
SAVAYSAa
n/N (%) |
Warfarin
n/N (%) |
SAVAYSA vs. Warfarin HR (95% CI) |
All patients with symptomatic recurrent VTEb |
130/4118 (3.2) |
146/4122 (3.5) |
0.89 (0.70,1.13) |
PE with or without DVT |
73/4118 (1.8) |
83/4122 (2.0) |
- |
Fatal PE and Death where PE cannot be ruled out |
24/4118 (0.6) |
24/4122 (0.6) |
- |
Non-fatal PE |
49/4118 (1.2) |
59/4122 (1.4) |
- |
DVT only |
57/4118 (1.4) |
63/4122 (1.5) |
- |
Index PEc patients with symptomatic recurrent VTE |
47/1650 (2.8) |
65/1669 (3.9) |
- |
Index DVTd patients with symptomatic recurrent VTE |
83/2468 (3.4) |
81/2453 (3.3) |
- |
Abbreviations: mITT = modified intent-to-treat; HR
=hazard ratio vs. warfarin; CI =confidence interval; N=number of patients in
mITT population; n = number of events
a Includes patients dose-reduced to 30 mg. Among the 1452 (17.6%)
patients with low body weight (≤ 60 kg), moderate renal impairment (CrCL
≤ 50 mL/min), or concomitant use of P-gp inhibitors in the Hokusai VTE
study, 22 (3.0%) of the SAVAYSA patients (30 mg once daily, n =733) and 30 (4.2%)
of warfarin patients (n= 719) had a symptomatic recurrent VTE event
b Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Symptomatic recurrent VTE (i.e., the
composite endpoint of DVT, non-fatal PE and fatal PE)
c Index PE refers to patients whose presenting diagnosis was PE
(with or without concomitant DVT)
d Index DVT refers to patients whose presenting diagnosis was DVT
only |
Figure 14.3: Kaplan-Meier Cumulative Event Rate
Estimates for Adjudicated Recurrent VTE (mITT analysis – on treatment)