Clinical Pharmacology for Rubraca Tablets
Mechanism Of Action
Rucaparib is an inhibitor of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) enzymes, including PARP-1, PARP-2, and PARP-3, which play a role in DNA repair. In vitro studies have shown that rucaparib-induced cytotoxicity may involve inhibition of PARP enzymatic activity and increased formation of PARP-DNA complexes resulting in DNA damage, apoptosis, and cancer cell death. Increased rucaparib-induced cytotoxicity and anti-tumor activity was observed in tumor cell lines with deficiencies in BRCA1/2 and other DNA repair genes. Rucaparib has been shown to decrease tumor growth in mouse xenograft models of human cancer with or without deficiencies in BRCA.
Pharmacodynamics
The exposure-response relationship and time course of pharmacodynamic response for the safety and effectiveness of rucaparib has not fully been characterized.
Cardiac Electrophysiology
A positive concentration-QTc relationship was observed in patients who were administered continuous dosages of Rubraca ranging from 40 mg once daily (0.03 times the approved recommended dosage) to 840 mg twice daily (1.4 times the approved recommended dosage). The mean (90% confidence interval [CI]) QTcF increase from baseline at steady state of Rubraca 600 mg twice daily was 14.9 msec (11.1, 18.7 msec).
Pharmacokinetics
The AUC and Cmax of rucaparib demonstrated linear pharmacokinetics over a dose range from 240 mg to 840 mg twice daily (0.4 times to 1.4 times the approved recommended dosage). The mean (coefficient of variation [CV]) steady-state rucaparib Cmax is 1,940 ng/mL (54%) and AUC0-12h is 16,900 h·ng/mL (54%) at the approved recommended dosage. The mean AUC accumulation ratio is 3.5 to 6.2 fold.
Absorption
The median Tmax (min, max) at the steady state is 1.9 hours (0, 5.98) at the approved recommended dosage. The mean (min, max) absolute bioavailability is 36% (30%, 45%).
Effect of Food
Following a high-fat meal (approximately 800-1000 calories, including approximately 250 calories from carbohydrates, approximately 500-600 calories from fat, approximately 150 calories from protein), the Cmax was increased by 20%, AUC0-24h was increased by 38%, and the Tmax was delayed by 2.5 hours, as compared to fasted conditions [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION].
Distribution
The mean apparent volume of distribution is 2300 L (21%).
Rucaparib is 70% bound to human plasma proteins in vitro. Rucaparib preferentially distributed to red blood cells with a blood-to-plasma concentration ratio of 1.8.
Elimination
The mean apparent total clearance at steady state is 44.2 L/h (45%) and the mean terminal elimination half-life is 26 (39%) hours.
Metabolism
In vitro, rucaparib is primarily metabolized by CYP2D6 and to a lesser extent by CYP1A2 and CYP3A4. In addition to CYP-based oxidation, rucaparib also undergoes N-demethylation, N-methylation, and glucuronidation.
Excretion
Following a single oral dose of radiolabeled rucaparib, unchanged rucaparib accounted for 64% of the radioactivity. Rucaparib accounted for 45% and 95% of radioactivity in urine and feces, respectively.
Specific Populations
Age (20 to 86 years), race (White, Black, and Asian), sex, body weight (41 to 171 kg), mild to moderate renal impairment (CLcr ≥ 30 mL/min), mild hepatic impairment (total bilirubin < ULN and AST > ULN or total bilirubin 1 to 1.5 x ULN and any AST), and CYP2D6 or CYP1A2 genotype polymorphisms did not have a clinically meaningful effect on the pharmacokinetics of rucaparib. The effect of severe renal impairment (CLcr 15 to 29 mL/min), end-stage renal disease (CLcr < 15 mL/min), or severe hepatic impairment (total bilirubin > 3 x ULN and any AST) has not been studied.
Hepatic Impairment
Moderate hepatic impairment (total bilirubin > 1.5 to 3 x ULN and any AST) increased rucaparib AUC by 45%, but had no effect on Cmax compared to patients with normal hepatic function.
Drug Interaction Studies
Clinical Studies And Model-Informed Approaches
Effect of Other Drugs on Rucaparib
Concomitant administration of Rubraca with a proton pump inhibitor had no clinically meaningful effect on steady-state concentrations of rucaparib.
Effect of Rucaparib on Other Drugs
Concomitant administration of Rubraca with rosuvastatin (BCRP substrate) had no clinically meaningful effect on the concentrations of rosuvastatin.
Coadministration of Rubraca with the following substrates increased the Cmax of each coadministered substrate by ≤ 1.1fold and increased the AUC of each substrate as follows:
- Caffeine (CYP1A2): by 2.6-fold
- Midazolam (CYP3A4): by 1.4-fold
- Warfarin (CYP2C9): by 1.5-fold
- Omeprazole (CYP2C19): by 1.6-fold
- Digoxin (P-glycoprotein): by 1.2-fold
Concomitant administration of Rubraca with an oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel (CYP3A substrates): increased ethinylestradiol AUC by 1.4-fold and levonorgestrel AUC by 1.6-fold, but did not have a clinically meaningful effect on their Cmax.
In Vitro Studies
Cytochrome P450 (CYP) Enzymes
Rucaparib inhibited CYP2C8 and CYP2D6 and induced CYP1A2.
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) Enzymes: Rucaparib inhibited UGT1A1.
Transporter Systems
Rucaparib is a substrate of P-gp and BCRP. Rucaparib is not a substrate of OATP1B1, OATP1B3, OAT1, OAT3, or OCT2.
Rucaparib inhibited OATP1B1, OATP1B3, OAT1, OAT3, MATE1, MATE2-K, OCT1, OCT2, and MRP4. Rucaparib did not inhibit MRP2, MRP3, or BSEP.
Clinical Studies
Maintenance Treatment Of BRCA-Mutated Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
The efficacy of Rubraca was investigated in ARIEL3 (NCT01968213), a double-blind, multicenter clinical trial in which 564 patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who were in response to platinum-based chemotherapy were randomized (2:1) to receive Rubraca tablets 600 mg orally twice daily (n=375) or placebo (n=189). Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. All patients had achieved a response (complete or partial) to their most recent platinum-based chemotherapy. Randomization was stratified by best response to last platinum (complete or partial), time to progression following the penultimate platinum therapy (6 to ≤ 12 months and > 12 months), and tumor biomarker status.
Tumor tissue samples were tested using a clinical trial assay (CTA) (N=564) and an investigational Foundation Medicine tissue test (n=518). Of the samples evaluated with both tests, tumor BRCA (tBRCA) mutant status was confirmed for 99% (177/178) of tBRCA-positive patients determined by the CTA. Blood samples for 94% (186/196) of the tBRCA patients were evaluated using a central blood germline BRCA test. Based on these results, 70% (130/186) of the tBRCA patients had a germline BRCA mutation and 30% (56/186) had a somatic BRCA mutation. The efficacy results are based on the tBRCA (germline or somatic) subgroup.
The major efficacy outcome was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) evaluated according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1 (v1.1). Overall survival (OS) was an additional outcome measure.
Of the 564 enrolled patients, 196 patients (35%) had a tBRCA mutation. Among the patients who had a tBRCA mutation, the median age was 58 years (range: 42 to 81) for patients receiving Rubraca and 59 years (range: 36 to 84) for those on placebo; the majority were White (84%); and 100% had an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. All patients had received at least two prior platinum-based chemotherapies (range: 2 to 5). A total of 33% of patients were in complete response (CR) to their most recent therapy. The progression-free interval to penultimate platinum was 6-12 months in 41% of patients and > 12 months in 59%. Prior bevacizumab therapy was reported for 22% of patients who received Rubraca and 17% of patients who received placebo. Measurable disease was present at baseline in 32% of patients.
ARIEL3 demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in PFS for patients randomized to Rubraca as compared with placebo in patients who had a tBRCA mutation. Results from a blinded independent radiology review were consistent.
Efficacy results for patients with a tBRCA mutation are summarized in Table 6 and Figure 1.
Table 8. Efficacy Results in Patients with tBRCA-mutated Ovarian Cancer – ARIEL3 (Investigator Assessment)a
|
RUBRACA
N=130 |
Placebo
N=66 |
| Progression Free Survival |
| Number of events, n (%) |
67 (52%) |
56 (85%) |
| Median in months (95% CI) |
16.6 (13.4-22.9) |
5.4 (3.4-6.7) |
| HR (95% CI) |
0.23 (0.16, 0.34) |
| p-value |
< 0.0001 |
|
a tBRCA includes all patients with a deleterious germline or somatic BRCA mutation, as determined by the CTA.
|
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier Curves of Progression-Free Survival in ARIEL3 as Assessed by Investigator: tBRCA Group
A final OS analysis was conducted after 130 events were observed. Exploratory OS results showed a HR of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.58, 1.19) in the tBRCA subgroup with a median OS of 45.9 months (95% CI: 37.7, 59.6) for patients treated with RUBRACA and 47.8 months (95% CI: 43.2, 55.8) for patients on placebo.
BRCA-mutated Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
TRITON3
The efficacy of RUBRACA was evaluated in TRITON3 (NCT02975934), a randomized, open-label, multi-center trial that evaluated RUBRACA compared to an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI; enzalutamide or abiraterone acetate) or docetaxel in patients with progressive BRCA or ATM mutated metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The trial enrolled 405 patients with mCRPC, of whom 302 had BRCA mutations. Patients were required to have progressed on treatment with one ARPI and could not have received prior chemotherapy in the castrate-resistant setting. Prior taxane chemotherapy for castration-sensitive disease was permitted. Patients were required to be surgically or medically castrated with a castrate level of serum testosterone at study entry. BRCA gene mutation status was determined prospectively testing tumor tissue or plasma using Foundation Medicine, Inc. assays or through local testing.
Patients were randomized (2:1) to receive RUBRACA 600 mg twice daily (n=270) or ARPI (enzalutamide or abiraterone acetate; n=60) or docetaxel (n=75). Randomization was stratified by ECOG performance status (0 or 1), hepatic metastases (present or not), and type of mutation (BRCA1, BRCA2, or ATM). If patients were being treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), therapy was continued throughout the study. Bone-targeted agents were allowed.
Of the 302 patients with BRCAm disease, the median age was 69 years (range: 45 to 92 years); 75% were White, 5% Black, 1.3% Asian, 0.3% American Indian or Alaska Native, 1% multiple races, and 18% unknown; 1.7% were Hispanic/Latino; and baseline ECOG performance status (PS) was 0 (49%) or 1 (51%). Forty percent of patients had bone-only disease; 32% had visceral disease. In the mCSPC setting, 23% of patients had received docetaxel. Among those with BRCAm disease, 40 patients had BRCA1 mutations, and 262 patients had BRCA2 mutations.
The major efficacy outcome measure was radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) as determined by independent radiology review (IRR) using RECIST version 1.1 and Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 (PCWG3) (bone) criteria. Additional efficacy outcome measures included overall survival (OS) and IRR-assessed objective response rate (ORR).
TRITON3 demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in IRR-assessed rPFS for RUBRACA compared to ARPI or docetaxel in patients with BRCAm and in the overall population. In an exploratory analysis in the subgroup of 103 (25%) patients with ATM mutations, the rPFS hazard ratio was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.59, 1.52) and the OS hazard ratio was 1.21 (95% CI: 0.77, 1.90), indicating that the improvement in the overall population was primarily attributed to the results seen in the subgroup of patients with BRCAm. Of patients with BRCAm who were randomized to receive ARPI or docetaxel (n=101), 52% crossed over to receive RUBRACA after disease progression.
Efficacy results of the BRCAm population in TRITON3 are provided in Table 9, Figure 2 and Figure 3.
Table 9. Efficacy Results from the BRCAm Subgroup of the TRITON3 Study
| Endpoint |
RUBRACA
N = 201f |
ARPI or Docetaxel
N = 101f |
| Radiographic Progression Free Survivala |
|
|
| Number of events, n (%) |
115 (57%) |
67 (66%) |
| Median in months (95% CI) |
11.2 (9.2-13.8) |
6.4 (5.4-8.3) |
| Hazard ratiob (95% CI) |
0.50 (0.36, 0.69) |
| p-valuec |
< 0.0001 |
| Overall Survivald |
|
| Number of events, n (%) |
152 (76%) |
74 (73%) |
| Median in months (95% CI) |
23.2 (19.1, 25.2) |
21.2 (18.0, 23.1) |
| Hazard ratiob (95% CI) |
0.91 (0.68, 1.20) |
| p-valuec |
NS |
| Confirmed Overall Response Ratea,e |
N=82 |
N=41 |
| Overall response rate (95% CI) |
45.1 (34.1, 56.5) |
17.1 (7.2, 32.1) |
| Number of complete responses, n (%) |
10 (12.2) |
2 (4.9) |
| Number of partial responses, n (%) |
27 (32.9) |
5 (12.2) |
NS = Not significant
a Based on IRR assessment.
b Cox proportional hazards model stratified by ECOG Status (0 or 1) and type of mutation (BRCA1 or BRCA2).
c P-value based on the stratified log-rank test
d Based on pre-specified final analysis.
e Based on patients with measurable disease at baseline per IRR assessment. Responses are based on soft tissue and bone lesion assessment.
f Based on the BRCA mutation status used at the randomization. This excludes one patient with a reported ATM mutation at randomization but found to have a BRCA2 mutation based on the verified source. |
Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier Curves of rPFS from the BRCAm Subgroup of the TRITON3 Study (IRR-assessed)
Figure 3 Kaplan-Meier Curves of Final OS from the BRCAm Subgroup of the TRITON3 Study
Exploratory subgroup analysis of rPFS and OS for patients with BRCA1m and BRCA2m (including one patient with a BRCA2 mutation mischaracterized as having an ATM mutation at randomization) were performed. The rPFS and OS hazard ratios were 1.01 (95% CI: 0.48, 2.13) and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.46, 2.00) respectively in the subgroup with BRCA1 mutations (n=40) and 0.46 (95% CI: 0.33, 0.65) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.68, 1.24) respectively in the subgroup with BRCA2 mutations (n=263).
TRITON2
The efficacy of RUBRACA was investigated in TRITON2 (NCT02952534), a multi-center, single arm clinical trial in patients with BRCA-mutated mCRPC who had been treated with androgen receptor-directed therapy and taxane-based chemotherapy. There were 115 patients with either germline or somatic BRCA mutations enrolled in TRITON2, of whom 62 patients had measurable disease at baseline by independent radiology review (IRR). Patients received RUBRACA 600 mg orally twice daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also received concomitant GnRH analog or had prior bilateral orchiectomy. Objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) were assessed in patients with measurable disease by blinded IRR and by the investigator according to modified RECIST v1.1/ Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) criteria.
For the 62 patients with measurable disease at baseline, the median age was 73 years (range 52 to 88); the majority were White (73%) and 10% were Black; and 98% of patients had an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. All patients had received at least one prior androgen receptor-directed therapy, 34% had received 2 prior androgen receptor-directed therapies and 2% had received 3 prior androgen receptor-directed therapies, and all patients also received prior taxane chemotherapy. Eighteen percent of patients had lung and 21% had liver metastases at baseline. Twenty-four percent had metastases to lymph nodes alone. Forty percent had 10 or more bone lesions at baseline.
All 62 patients had a deleterious somatic or germline BRCA mutation detected from either central plasma (26%), central tissue (32%), or local (42%) testing. Of the 62 patients, 66% had a somatic BRCA mutation, 34% had a germline BRCA mutation, 85% had a BRCA2 mutation, and 15% had a BRCA1 mutation.
The major efficacy outcomes of the study were confirmed ORR by IRR using modified RECIST v1.1/PCWG3 criteria and DOR. Efficacy results of TRITON2 are provided in Table 10. The ORR by IRR was similar in patients with germline versus somatic BRCA mutation.
Table 10. Efficacy Results in Patients with BRCA-mutated mCRPC - TRITON2 (IRR-assessed)
| |
RUBRACA
(N = 62) |
| Confirmed Objective Response Rate (95% CI)a |
44% (31, 57) |
| Median DOR in months (95% CI)b |
NE (6.4, NE) |
NE = not evaluable
a Defined per modified RECIST v1.1 criteria and with no confirmed bone progression per PCWG3.
b The range for the DOR was 1.7-24+ months. Fifteen of the 27 (56%) patients with a confirmed objective response had a DOR of ≥ 6 months. |