CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism Of Action
Rucaparib is an inhibitor of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase
(PARP) enzymes, including PARP-1, PARP-2, and PARP-3, which play a role in DNA
repair. In vitro studies have shown that rucaparib-induced cytotoxicity may
involve inhibition of PARP enzymatic activity and increased formation of
PARP-DNA complexes resulting in DNA damage, apoptosis, and cancer cell death.
Increased rucaparib-induced cytotoxicity and anti-tumor activity was observed
in tumor cell lines with deficiencies in BRCA½ and other DNA repair genes.
Rucaparib has been shown to decrease tumor growth in mouse xenograft models of
human cancer with or without deficiencies in BRCA.
Pharmacodynamics
The pharmacodynamic response of rucaparib has not been
characterized.
Cardiac Electrophysiology
The effect of multiple doses of Rubraca on QTc interval was
evaluated in an open-label single-arm study in 56 patients with solid tumors
who were administered continuous doses of Rubraca ranging from 40 mg once daily
(0.03 times the approved recommended dose) to 840 mg twice daily (1.4 times the
approved recommended dose). The mean QTcF increase from baseline (90%
confidence interval [CI]) in population pharmacokinetics estimated 95th percentile
Cmax (3019 ng/mL) at steady state of 600 mg rucaparib twice daily was 14.9 msec
(11.1-18.7 msec).
Pharmacokinetics
The pharmacokinetic profile of rucaparib was
characterized in patients with cancer. Rucaparib demonstrated linear pharmacokinetics
over a dose range from 240 to 840 mg twice daily with time-independence and
dose-proportionality. The mean steady-state rucaparib Cmax was 1940 ng/mL (54%
coefficient of variation [CV]) and AUC0-12h was 16900 h•ng/mL (54% CV) at the approved
recommended dose. Accumulation was 3.5 to 6.2 fold.
Absorption
The median Tmax was 1.9 hours at the approved recommended
dose. The mean absolute bioavailability of rucaparib immediate-release tablet
was 36% with a range from 30% to 45%.
Following a high-fat meal, the Cmax was increased by 20%
and AUC0-24h was increased by 38%, and Tmax was delayed by 2.5 hours, as
compared to dosing under fasted conditions [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION].
Distribution
Rucaparib had a steady-state volume of distribution of
113 L to 262 L following a single intravenous dose of 12 mg to 40 mg rucaparib.
In vitro, the protein binding of rucaparib was 70% in
human plasma at therapeutic concentrations. Rucaparib preferentially
distributed to red blood cells with a blood-to-plasma concentration ratio of
1.83.
Elimination
The mean terminal T½ of rucaparib was 17 to 19 hours,
following a single oral dose of 600 mg rucaparib. The apparent clearance ranged
from 15.3 to 79.2 L/hour, following rucaparib 600 mg twice daily. The clearance
ranged from 13.9 to 18.4 L/hour, following a single intravenous dose of
rucaparib 12 mg to 40 mg.
Metabolism
In vitro, rucaparib had a low metabolic turnover rate and
was metabolized primarily by CYP2D6 and to a lesser extent by CYP1A2 and
CYP3A4.
Specific Populations
Age, Race, And Body Weight
Based on population pharmacokinetic analyses, age, race,
and body weight did not have a clinically meaningful effect on rucaparib
exposure.
Renal Impairment
In patients who received Rubraca 600 mg twice daily,
those with mild renal impairment (N=148; baseline CLcr between 60 and 89
mL/min, as estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault method) and those with moderate
renal impairment (N=72; CLcr between 30 and 59 mL/min) showed approximately 15%
and 32% higher steady-state AUC, respectively, compared to patients with normal
renal function (N=143; CLcr greater than or equal to 90 mL/min). The
pharmacokinetic characteristics of rucaparib in patients with CLcr less than 30
mL/min or patients on dialysis are unknown.
Hepatic Impairment
Based on population pharmacokinetic analyses, no apparent
pharmacokinetic difference was observed in 34 patients with mild hepatic
impairment (total bilirubin less than or equal to ULN and AST greater than ULN,
or total bilirubin between 1.0 to 1.5 times ULN and any AST) who received
Rubraca 600 mg twice daily as compared to patients with normal hepatic function
(N=337). The pharmacokinetic characteristics of rucaparib in patients with
moderate to severe hepatic impairment (total bilirubin greater than 1.5 times
ULN) are unknown.
CYP Enzyme Polymorphism
Based on population pharmacokinetic analyses,
steady-state concentrations following rucaparib 600 mg twice daily did not
differ significantly across CYP2D6 or CYP1A2 genotype subgroups.
Drug Interaction Studies
Effect Of Rucaparib On Other Drugs
Clinical Studies
A single dose of the following drugs was administered
before and following rucaparib 600 mg twice daily for 7 days. The Cmax of each
co-administered drug was ≤ 1.13-fold, and the AUC changed as follows:
- Caffeine (CYP1A2): caffeine AUC increased by 2.55-fold
- Midazolam (CYP3A4): midazolam AUC increased by 1.38-fold
- Warfarin (CYP2C9): warfarin AUCincreased by 1.49-fold
- Omeprazole (CYP2C19): omeprazole AUC increased by
1.55-fold
- Digoxin (P-glycoprotein): digoxin AUC increased by
1.20-fold
In Vitro Studies
Rucaparib inhibited CYP2C8, CYP2D6, and uridine
diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1). Rucaparib induced CYP1A2, and
down regulated CYP3A4 and CYP2B6.
Rucaparib inhibited the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) efflux
transporter, breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), organic anion transporting
polypeptides 1B1 and 1B3 (OATP1B1 and OATP1B3), organic anion transporters 1
and 3 (OAT1 and OAT3), multidrug and toxin extrusion 1 and 2-k (MATE1 and
MATE2-K), organic cation transporters 1 and 2 (OCT1 and OCT2), and multidrug
resistance-associated protein 4 (MRP4). No apparent inhibition was observed for
MRP2, MRP3, or BSEP.
Effects Of Other Drugs On Rucaparib
Clinical Studies
In a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) analysis,
co-administration with proton pump inhibitors had no clinically significant
effect on steady-state concentrations of rucaparib.
In Vitro Studies
Rucaparib was a substrate of P-gp and BCRP; however,
rucaparib was not a substrate of OATP1B1, OATP1B3, OAT1, OAT3, and OCT2.
Clinical Studies
Maintenance Treatment Of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
The efficacy of Rubraca was investigated in ARIEL3
(NCT01968213), a double-blind, multicenter clinical trial in which 564 patients
with recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer
who were in response to platinum-based chemotherapy were randomized (2:1) to
receive Rubraca tablets 600 mg orally twice daily (n=375) or placebo (n=189).
Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. All
patients had achieved a response (complete or partial) to their most recent
platinum-based chemotherapy. Randomization was stratified by best response to
last platinum (complete or partial), time to progression following the
penultimate platinum therapy (6 to ≤ 12 months and > 12 months), and
tumor biomarker status. The major efficacy outcome was investigator-assessed progression-free
survival (PFS) evaluated according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid
Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1 (v1.1).
The median age was 61 years (range: 39 to 84) for
patients receiving Rubraca and 62 years (range: 36 to 85) for those on placebo;
the majority were White (80%); and 100% had an ECOG performance status of 0 or
1. All patients had received at least two prior platinum-based chemotherapies
(range: 2 to 7). A total of 34% of patients were in complete response (CR) to
their most recent therapy. The progression-free interval to penultimate
platinum was 6-12 months in 40% of patients and > 12 months in 60%. Prior
bevacizumab therapy was reported for 22% of patients who received Rubraca and 23%
of patients who received placebo. Measurable disease was present at baseline in
37% of patients.
Tumor tissue samples were tested using a clinical trial
assay (CTA) (N=564), and the FoundationFocus™ CDx BRCA LOH test (n=518). Of the
samples evaluated with both tests, homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)
positive status (as defined by the presence of a deleterious BRCA mutation or
high genomic loss of heterozygosity) was confirmed by the FoundationFocus™ CDx BRCA
LOH test for 94% (313/332) of HRD-positive patients determined by the CTA; and
of these, tumor BRCA (tBRCA) mutant status was confirmed by the
FoundationFocus™ CDx BRCA LOH test for 99% (177/178) of tBRCA-positive patients
determined by the CTA. Blood samples for 94% (186/196) of the tBRCA patients
were evaluated using a central blood germline BRCA test. Based on these
results, 70% (130/186) of the tBRCA patients had a germline BRCA mutation and
30% (56/186) had a somatic BRCA mutation.
ARIEL3 demonstrated a statistically significant
improvement in PFS for patients randomized to Rubraca as compared with placebo
in all patients, and in the HRD and tBRCA subgroups. Results from a blinded
independent radiology review were consistent. At the time of the analysis of
PFS, overall survival (OS) data were not mature (with 22% of events). Efficacy
results are summarized in Table 6 and Figures 1, 2, and 3.
Table 6: Efficacy Results - ARIEL3 (Investigator
Assessment)
|
Rubraca |
Placebo |
All Patientsa |
Patients, N |
375 |
189 |
PFS events, n (%) |
234 (62%) |
167 (88%) |
PFS, median in months |
10.8 |
5.4 |
HR (95% CI) |
0.36 (0.30, 0.45) |
p-value |
< 0.0001 |
HRD Groupb |
Patients, N |
236 |
118 |
PFS events, n (%) |
134 (57%) |
101 (86%) |
PFS, median in months |
13.6 |
5.4 |
HR (95% CI) |
0.32 (0.24, 0.42) |
p-value |
< 0.0001 |
tBRCA Groupc |
Patients, N |
130 |
66 |
PFS events, n (%) |
67 (52%) |
56 (85%) |
PFS, median in months |
16.6 |
5.4 |
HR (95% CI) |
0.23 (0.16, 0.34) |
p-value |
< 0.0001 |
a All randomized patients.
b HRD includes all patients with a deleterious germline or somatic
BRCA mutation or high genomic loss of heterozygosity, as determined by the CTA.
c tBRCA includes all patients with a deleterious germline or somatic
BRCA mutation, as determined by the CTA. |
Figure 1: Kaplan-Meier Curves of Progression-Free
Survival in ARIEL3 as Assessed by Investigator: All Patients
Figure 2: Kaplan-Meier Curves of Progression-Free
Survival in ARIEL3 as Assessed by Investigator: HRD Group
Figure 3: Kaplan-Meier Curves of Progression-Free
Survival in ARIEL3 as Assessed by Investigator: Tbrca Group
Treatment Of BRCA-mutated Ovarian Cancer After 2 Or More
Chemotherapies
The efficacy of Rubraca was investigated in 106 patients
in two multicenter, single-arm, open-label clinical trials, Study 10
(NCT01482715) and ARIEL2 (NCT01891344), in patients with advanced BRCA-mutant
ovarian cancer who had progressed after 2 or more prior chemotherapies. All 106
patients received Rubraca 600 mg orally twice daily as monotherapy until
disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Objective response rate (ORR) and
duration of response (DOR) were assessed by the investigator and IRR according
to RECIST v1.1.
The median age of the patients was 59 years (range: 33 to
84), the majority were White (78%), and 100% had an ECOG performance status of
0 or 1. All patients had received at least two prior platinum-based
chemotherapies and 43% had received 3 or more prior lines of platinum-based
chemotherapy. There were 18/106 patients (17%) who had deleterious BRCA mutations
detected in tumor tissue and not in whole blood specimens. Tumor BRCA mutation
status was verified retrospectively in 96% (64/67) of the patients for whom a
tumor tissue sample was available by the companion diagnostic FoundationFocus™
CDxBRCA test, which is FDA approved for selection of patients for Rubraca
treatment. Efficacy results are summarized in Table 7.
Table 7: Overall Response and Duration of Response in
Patients with BRCA-mutant Ovarian Cancer Who Received 2 or More Chemotherapies
in Study 10 and ARIEL2
|
Investigator-assessed N=106 |
Objective Response Rate (95% CI) |
54% (44, 64) |
Complete Response |
9% |
Partial Response |
45% |
Median DOR in months (95% CI) |
9.2 (6.6, 11.6) |
Response assessment by independent radiology review was
42% (95% CI [32, 52]), with a median DOR of 6.7 months (95% CI [5.5, 11.1]).
Investigator-assessed ORR was 66% (52/79; 95% CI [54, 76]) in
platinum-sensitive patients, 25% (5/20; 95% CI [9, 49]) in platinum-resistant
patients, and 0% (0/7; 95% CI [0, 41]) in platinum-refractory patients. ORR was
similar for patients with a BRCA1 gene mutation or BRCA2 gene mutation.