Clinical Pharmacology for Retevmo
Mechanism Of Action
Selpercatinib is a kinase inhibitor. Selpercatinib inhibited wild-type RET and multiple mutated RET isoforms as well as VEGFR1 and VEGFR3 with IC50 values ranging from 0.92 nM to 67.8 nM. In other enzyme assays, selpercatinib also inhibited FGFR 1, 2, and 3 at higher concentrations that were still clinically achievable. In cellular assays, selpercatinib inhibited RET at approximately 60-fold lower concentrations than FGFR1 and 2 and approximately 8-fold lower concentration than VEGFR3.
Certain point mutations in RET or chromosomal rearrangements involving in-frame fusions of RET with various partners can result in constitutively activated chimeric RET fusion proteins that can act as oncogenic drivers by promoting cell proliferation of tumor cell lines. In in vitro and in vivo tumor models, selpercatinib demonstrated anti-tumor activity in cells harboring constitutive activation of RET proteins resulting from gene fusions and mutations, including CCDC6-RET, KIF5B-RET, RET V804M, and RET M918T. In addition, selpercatinib showed anti-tumor activity in mice intracranially implanted with a patient-derived RET fusion positive tumor.
Pharmacodynamics
Exposure-Response Relationship
Selpercatinib exposure-response relationships and the time course of pharmacodynamic response have not been fully characterized.
Cardiac Electrophysiology
The effect of RETEVMO on the QTc interval was evaluated in a thorough QT study in healthy subjects. The largest mean increase in QTc is predicted to be 10.6 msec (upper 90% confidence interval: 12.1 msec) at the mean steady-state maximum concentration (Cmax) observed in patients after administration of 160 mg twice daily. The increase in QTc was concentration-dependent.
Pharmacokinetics
The pharmacokinetics of selpercatinib capsules were evaluated in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors administered 160 mg twice daily unless otherwise specified. The capsule and tablet dosage forms of selpercatinib are bioequivalent. Steady state selpercatinib AUC and Cmax increased in a slightly greater than dose proportional manner over the dose range of 20 mg once daily to 240 mg twice daily [0.06 to 1.5 times the maximum recommended total daily dosage].
Steady-state was reached by approximately 7 days and the median accumulation ratio after administration of 160 mg twice daily was 3.4-fold. Mean steady-state selpercatinib [coefficient of variation (CV%)] Cmax was 2,980 (53%) ng/mL and AUC0-24h was 51,600 (58%) ng*h/mL.
Absorption
The median tmax of selpercatinib is 2 hours. The mean absolute bioavailability of RETEVMO capsules is 73% (60% to 82%) in healthy subjects.
Effect of Food
For both the capsule and tablet dosage forms no clinically significant differences in selpercatinib AUC or Cmax were observed following administration of a high-fat meal (approximately 900 calories, 58 grams carbohydrate, 56 grams fat and 43 grams protein) in healthy subjects.
Distribution
The apparent volume of distribution (Vss/F) of selpercatinib is 203 L.
Protein binding of selpercatinib is 96% in vitro and is independent of concentration. The blood-to-plasma concentration ratio is 0.7.
Elimination
The apparent clearance (CL/F) of selpercatinib is 6 L/h in patients and the half-life is 32 hours following oral administration of RETEVMO in healthy subjects.
Metabolism
Selpercatinib is metabolized predominantly by CYP3A4. Following oral administration of a single radiolabeled 160 mg dose of selpercatinib to healthy subjects, unchanged selpercatinib constituted 86% of the radioactive drug components in plasma.
Excretion
Following oral administration of a single radiolabeled 160 mg dose of selpercatinib to healthy subjects, 69% of the administered dose was recovered in feces (14% unchanged) and 24% in urine (12% unchanged).
Specific Populations
The apparent volume of distribution and clearance of selpercatinib increase with increasing body weight (9.6 kg to 179 kg).
No clinically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of selpercatinib were observed based on age (2 years to 92 years), sex, or mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment (eGFR ≥15 to 89 mL/min). The effect of ESRD on selpercatinib pharmacokinetics has not been studied.
Pediatric Patients
The exposures of selpercatinib in pediatric patients are predicted to be comparable to those in adult patients administered at the recommended dosages.
Patients With Hepatic Impairment
The selpercatinib AUC0-INF increased 1.07-fold, 1.32-fold, and 1.77-fold in subjects with mild (total bilirubin less than or equal to ULN with AST greater than ULN or total bilirubin greater than 1 to 1.5 times ULN with any AST), moderate (total bilirubin greater than 1.5 to 3 times ULN and any AST), and severe (total bilirubin greater than 3 to 10 times ULN and any AST) hepatic impairment, respectively, compared to subjects with normal hepatic function.
Drug Interaction Studies
Clinical Studies And Model-Informed Approaches
Proton-Pump Inhibitors (PPI): Coadministration with multiple daily doses of omeprazole (PPI) decreased selpercatinib AUC0-INF and Cmax when RETEVMO was administered fasting. Coadministration with multiple daily doses of omeprazole did not significantly change the selpercatinib AUC0-INF and Cmax when RETEVMO was administered with food (Table 14).
Table 14: Change in Selpercatinib Exposure After Coadministration with PPI
|
Selpercatinib
AUC0-INF |
Selpercatinib
Cmax |
| RETEVMO fasting |
Reference |
Reference |
| RETEVMO fasting + PPI |
↓ 69% |
↓ 88% |
| RETEVMO with a high-fat meal1 + PPI |
↑ 2% |
↓ 49% |
| RETEVMO with a low-fat meal2 + PPI |
No change |
↓ 22% |
1 High-fat meal: approximately 150, 250, and 500-600 calories from protein, carbohydrate, and fat, respectively; approximately
800 to 1,000 calories total.
2 Low-fat meal: approximately 390 calories and 10 g of fat. |
H2 Receptor Antagonists
No clinically significant differences in selpercatinib pharmacokinetics were observed when coadministered with multiple daily doses of ranitidine (H2 receptor antagonist) given 10 hours prior to and 2 hours after the RETEVMO dose (administered fasting).
Strong CYP3A Inhibitors
Coadministration of multiple doses of itraconazole (strong CYP3A inhibitor) increased the selpercatinib AUC0-INF 2.33-fold and Cmax 1.3-fold.
Moderate CYP3A Inhibitors
Coadministration of multiple doses of diltiazem, fluconazole, or verapamil (moderate CYP3A inhibitors) is predicted to increase the selpercatinib AUC 1.6 to 1.99-fold and Cmax 1.46 to 1.76-fold.
Strong CYP3A Inducers
Coadministration of multiple doses of rifampin (strong CYP3A inducer) decreased the selpercatinib AUC0-INF by 87% and Cmax by 70%.
Moderate CYP3A Inducers
Coadministration of multiple doses of bosentan or efavirenz (moderate CYP3A inducers) is predicted to decrease the selpercatinib AUC by 40-70% and Cmax by 34-57%.
Weak CYP3A Inducers
Coadministration of multiple doses of modafinil (weak CYP3A inducer) is predicted to decrease the selpercatinib AUC by 33% and Cmax by 26%.
CYP2C8 Substrates
Coadministration of RETEVMO with repaglinide (sensitive CYP2C8 substrate) increased the repaglinide AUC0-INF 2.88-fold and Cmax 1.91-fold.
CYP3A Substrates
Coadministration of RETEVMO with midazolam (sensitive CYP3A substrate) increased the midazolam AUC0-INF 1.54-fold and Cmax 1.39-fold.
P-glycoprotein (P-gp) Substrates
Coadministration of RETEVMO with dabigatran (P-gp substrate) increased the dabigatran AUC0-INF 1.38-fold and Cmax 1.43-fold.
P-gp Inhibitors
No clinically significant differences in selpercatinib pharmacokinetics were observed when coadministered with a single dose of rifampin (P-gp inhibitor).
MATE1 Substrates
No clinically significant differences in glucose levels were observed when metformin (MATE1 substrate) was coadministered with selpercatinib.
In Vitro Studies
CYP Enzymes
Selpercatinib does not inhibit or induce CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, or CYP2D6 at clinically relevant concentrations.
Transporter Systems
Selpercatinib inhibits MATE1 and BCRP, but does not inhibit OAT1, OAT3, OCT1, OCT2, OATP1B1, OATP1B3, BSEP, and MATE2-K at clinically relevant concentrations. Selpercatinib may increase serum creatinine by decreasing renal tubular secretion of creatinine via inhibition of MATE1 [see Adverse Effects]. Selpercatinib is a substrate for P-gp and BCRP, but not for OAT1, OAT3, OCT1, OCT2, OATP1B1, OATP1B3, MATE1, or MATE2-K.
Clinical Studies
RET Fusion-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
LIBRETTO-001
The efficacy of RETEVMO was evaluated in patients with advanced RET fusion-positive NSCLC enrolled in a multicenter, open-label, multi-cohort clinical trial (LIBRETTO-001, NCT03157128). The study enrolled patients with advanced or metastatic RET fusion-positive NSCLC who had progressed on platinum-based chemotherapy and patients with locally advanced (stage III who were not candidates for surgical resection or definitive chemoradiation) or metastatic NSCLC without prior systemic therapy in separate cohorts. Identification of a RET gene alteration was prospectively determined in local laboratories using next generation sequencing (NGS), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or other local testing methods. Adult patients received RETEVMO 160 mg orally twice daily until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression; patients enrolled in the dose escalation phase were permitted to adjust their dose to 160 mg twice daily. The major efficacy outcome measures were confirmed overall response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR), as determined by a blinded independent review committee (BIRC) according to RECIST v1.1.
RET Fusion-Positive NSCLC Previously Treated With Platinum Chemotherapy
Efficacy was evaluated in 247 patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC previously treated with platinum chemotherapy enrolled into a cohort of LIBRETTO-001.
The median age was 61 years (range: 23 to 81); 57% were female; 44% were White, 48% were Asian, 4.9% were Black or African American; and 2.8% were Hispanic/Latino. ECOG performance status was 0-1 (97%) or 2 (3%) and 97% of patients had metastatic disease. Patients received a median of 2 prior systemic therapies (range 1–15); 58% had prior anti-PD1/PD-L1 therapy. RET fusions were detected in 94% of patients using NGS (84.6% tumor samples; 9.3% blood or plasma samples), 4.0% using FISH, 1.6% using PCR and 0.4% by other local testing methods.
Efficacy results for previously treated RET fusion-positive NSCLC are summarized in Table 15.
Table 15: Efficacy Results in LIBRETTO-001 (RET Fusion-Positive NSCLC Previously Treated with Platinum Chemotherapy)
|
RETEVMO
(n = 247) |
| Overall Response Rate1 (95% CI) |
61% (55%, 67%) |
| Complete response |
7.3% |
| Partial response |
54% |
| Duration of Response |
| Median in months (95% CI) |
28.6 (20, NE) |
| % with ≥ 12 months2 |
63% |
1 Confirmed overall response rate assessed by BIRC.
2 Based on observed duration of response.
NE = not estimable |
For the 144 patients who received an anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 therapy, either sequentially or concurrently with platinum-based chemotherapy, an exploratory subgroup analysis of ORR was 63% (95% CI: 54%, 70%) and the median DOR was 28.6 months (95% CI: 14.8, NE).
Among the 247 patients with previously treated RET fusion-positive NSCLC, 16 had measurable CNS metastases at baseline as assessed by BIRC. One patient received radiation therapy (RT) to the brain within 2 months prior to study entry. Responses in intracranial lesions were observed in 14 of these 16 patients; 39% of responders had an intracranial DOR of ≥ 12 months.
Treatment-Naïve RET Fusion-Positive NSCLC
Efficacy was evaluated in 69 patients with treatment-naïve RET fusion-positive NSCLC enrolled into a cohort of LIBRETTO-001.
The median age was 63 years (range 23 to 92); 62% were female; 70% were White, 19% were Asian, and 6% were Black or African American. ECOG performance status was 0-1 (94%) or 2 (6%) and 99% of patients had metastatic disease. RET fusions were detected in 91% of patients using NGS (60.9% tumor samples; 30.4% in blood), 7.2% using FISH and 1.4% using PCR.
Efficacy results for treatment naïve RET fusion-positive NSCLC are summarized in Table 16.
Table 16: Efficacy Results in LIBRETTO-001 (Treatment-Naïve RET Fusion-Positive NSCLC)
|
RETEVMO
(n =69) |
| Overall Response Rate1 (95% CI) |
84% (73%, 92%) |
| Complete response |
5.8% |
| Partial response |
78% |
| Duration of Response |
| Median in months (95% CI) |
20.2 (13, NE) |
| % with ≥ 12 months2 |
50% |
1 Confirmed overall response rate assessed by BIRC.
2 Based on observed duration of response
NE = not estimable |
Among the 69 patients with treatment-naïve RET fusion-positive NSCLC, 5 had measurable CNS metastases at baseline as assessed by BIRC. Two patients received RT to the brain within 2 months prior to study entry. Responses in intracranial lesions were observed in 4 of these 5 patients; 38% of responders had an intracranial DOR of ≥ 12 months.
LIBRETTO-431
The efficacy of RETEVMO was evaluated in patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic, RET fusion-positive NSCLC enrolled in a multicenter, open-label, active-controlled, randomized trial (LIBRETTO-431, NCT04194944). The trial evaluated RETEVMO compared to platinum-based and pemetrexed chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab in patients with RET fusion-positive, unresectable locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with no previous systemic therapy for metastatic disease.
Patients (N=261) were randomized to receive either RETEVMO (160 mg orally twice daily) in continuous 21-day cycles or pemetrexed intravenously (IV) (500 mg per square meter of body-surface area) along with the investigator’s choice of platinum therapy (carboplatin IV [AUC 5, maximum dose 750 mg] or cisplatin IV [75 mg per square meter]) with or without pembrolizumab IV (200 mg) every 21 days. Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Crossover from the control arm to RETEVMO was permitted following disease progression. Patients were stratified according to geographic region (East Asia vs. elsewhere), brain metastases at baseline (presence vs. absence or unknown), and the investigator’s intent (before randomization) to treat the patient with or without pembrolizumab. Tumor assessments were performed every 6 weeks for two assessments, then every 9 weeks for four assessments, and then every 12 weeks thereafter.
The major efficacy outcome measure was progression-free survival (PFS) in patients intended to be treated with chemotherapy in combination with pembrolizumab and in the overall study population as determined by a blinded independent review committee (BIRC) according to RECIST v1.1. Other efficacy outcome measures included overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR).
A total of 212 patients were enrolled in LIBRETTO-431 with an intent to treat with pembrolizumab if randomized to the control arm (129 into RETEVMO arm and 83 into chemotherapy with pembrolizumab arm). The median age was 61.5 years (range: 31 to 84 years); 47% were male; 41% White, 55% Asian, and 0.9% Black or African American, 1.4% American Indian or Alaska Native, 1.9% were race not reported; ethnicity was not reported in 96% of patients. ECOG performance status was 0-1 (97%) or 2 (3%), 68% were never smokers, 93% of patients had metastatic disease, and 14% had measurable intracranial metastases at baseline, as determined by a neuroradiologic BIRC. RET fusions were detected in 60% of patients using NGS and 40% using PCR (89% tumor samples; 11% in blood).
Efficacy results from the pre-planned interim efficacy analysis are summarized in Table 17.
Table 17: Efficacy Results in LIBRETTO-431: RETEVMO versus Chemotherapy with Pembrolizumab
Chemotherapy with pembrolizumab
(n = 83) Chemotherapy with pembrolizumab
(n = 83)
|
RETEVMO
(n = 129) |
Chemotherapy with pembrolizumab
(n = 83) |
| Progression-Free Survival |
| Number (%) of patients with an event |
49 (38%) |
49 (59%) |
| Medians in months (95% CI) |
24.8 (16.9, NE) |
11.2 (8.8, 16.8) |
| Hazard ratio1 (95% CI) |
0.46 (0.31, 0.70) |
| p-value2 |
0.0002 |
| Overall Response Rate (95% CI) |
84% (76, 90) |
65% (54, 75) |
| Complete response |
7% |
6% |
| Partial response |
77% |
59% |
| Duration of Response |
| Median in months (95% CI) |
24.2 (17.9, NE) |
11.5 (9.7, 23.3) |
| % with ≥ 12 months3 |
60% |
30% |
1 Based on the stratified Cox proportional hazard model, stratified by geographic location (East Asia versus elsewhere), brain metastases at baseline according to investigator (presence versus absence or unknown).
2 Based on stratified log-rank test, stratified by geographic location (East Asia versus elsewhere), brain metastases at baseline
according to investigator (presence versus absence or unknown).
3 Based on observed duration of response.
NE = not estimable |
Figure 1: Kaplan-Meier Curves of Progression-Free Survival in LIBRETTO-431: RETEVMO versus Chemotherapy with Pembrolizumab
Among the 212 randomized patients, 29 had measurable CNS metastases at baseline as assessed by BIRC. Responses in intracranial lesions were observed in 14 of 17 patients treated with RETEVMO and 7 of 12 patients treated with chemotherapy with pembrolizumab.
Overall survival was immature at the time of the PFS interim analysis. At the time of an updated descriptive analysis of OS (43% of prespecified OS events needed for the final analysis), a total of 49 (31%) and 26 (25%) patients died in the RETEVMO and the control arm, respectively. The OS HR was 1.26 (95% CI: 0.78, 2.04). Overall survival may be affected by the imbalance in post-progression therapies. Of 68 control arm patients who had disease progression, 50 patients (74%) received RETEVMO at progression. Of 71 RETEVMO arm patients who had disease progression, 16 (23%) received chemotherapy and/or immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, and 44 (62%) continued receiving RETEVMO.
RET-Mutant Medullary Thyroid Cancer
LIBRETTO-001
The efficacy of RETEVMO was evaluated in patients with RET-mutant MTC enrolled in a multicenter, open-label, multi-cohort clinical trial (NCT03157128). The study enrolled patients with advanced or metastatic RET-mutant MTC who had been previously treated with cabozantinib or vandetanib (or both) and patients with advanced or metastatic RET-mutant MTC who were naïve to cabozantinib and vandetanib in separate cohorts.
RET-Mutant MTC Previously Treated With Cabozantinib Or Vandetanib
Efficacy was evaluated in 55 patients with RET-mutant advanced MTC who had previously treated with cabozantinib or vandetanib enrolled into a cohort of LIBRETTO-001.
The median age was 57 years (range: 17 to 84); 66% were male; 89% were White, 7% were Hispanic/Latino, and 1.8% were Black. ECOG performance status was 0-1 (95%) or 2 (5%) and 98% of patients had metastatic disease. Patients received a median of 2 prior systemic therapies (range 1 – 8). RET mutation status was detected in 82% of patients using NGS (78% tumor samples; 4% blood or plasma), 16% using PCR, and 2% using an unknown test. The protocol excluded patients with synonymous, frameshift or nonsense RET mutations; the specific mutations used to identify and enroll patients are described in Table 18.
Table 18: Mutations used to Identify and Enroll Patients with RET-Mutant MTC in LIBRETTO-001
| RET Mutation Type1 |
Previously
Treated
(n = 55) |
Cabozantinib/
Vandetanib
Naïve
(n = 88) |
Total
(n = 143) |
| M918T |
33 |
49 |
82 |
| Extracellular cysteine mutation2 |
7 |
20 |
27 |
| V804M or V804L |
54 |
6 |
11 |
| Other3 |
10 |
13 |
23 |
1 Somatic or germline mutations; protein change.
2 Extracellular cysteine mutations involving cysteine residues 609, 611, 618, 620, 630, and 634.
3 Other included: K666N (1), D631_L633delinsV (2), D631_L633delinsE (5), D378_G385delinsE (1), D898_E901del (2), A883F (4), E632_L633del (4), L790F (2), T636_V637insCRT(1), D898_E901del + D903_S904delinsEP (1).
4 One patient also had a M918T mutation |
Efficacy results for RET-mutant MTC are summarized in Table 19.
Table 19: Efficacy Results in LIBRETTO-001 (RET-Mutant MTC Previously Treated with Cabozantinib or Vandetanib)
|
RETEVMO
(n = 55) |
| Overall Response Rate1 (95% CI) |
76% (63%, 87%) |
| Complete response |
18% |
| Partial response |
58% |
| Duration of Response |
| Median in months (95% CI) |
45.3 (29.9, NE) |
| % with ≥12 months2 |
76% |
1 Confirmed overall response rate assessed by BIRC.
2 Based on observed duration of response.
NE = not estimable |
Cabozantinib And Vandetanib-Naïve RET-Mutant MTC
Efficacy was evaluated in 88 patients with RET-mutant MTC who were cabozantinib and vandetanib treatment-naïve enrolled into a cohort of LIBRETTO-001.
The median age was 58 years (range: 15 to 82) with two patients (2.3%) aged 12 to 16 years; 66% were male; and 86% were White, 4.5% were Asian, and 2.3% were Hispanic/Latino. ECOG performance status was 0-1 (97%) or 2 (3.4%). All patients (100%) had metastatic disease and 18% had received 1 or 2 prior systemic therapies (including 8% kinase inhibitors, 4.5% chemotherapy, 2.3% anti-PD1/PD-L1 therapy, and 1.1% radioactive iodine). RET mutation status was detected in 77.3% of patients using NGS (75.0% tumor samples; 2.3% blood samples), 18.2% using PCR, and 4.5% using an unknown test. The mutations used to identify and enroll patients are described in Table 18.
Efficacy results for cabozantinib and vandetanib-naïve RET-mutant MTC are summarized in Table 20.
Table 20: Efficacy Results in LIBRETTO-001 (Cabozantinib and Vandetanib-naïve RET-Mutant MTC)
|
RETEVMO
(n = 88) |
| Overall Response Rate1 (95% CI) |
81% (71%, 88%) |
| Complete response |
28% |
| Partial response |
52% |
| Duration of Response |
| Median in months (95% CI) |
NR (51.3, NE) |
| % with ≥12 months2 |
90% |
1 Confirmed overall response rate assessed by BIRC.
2 Based on observed duration of response.
NR = not reached, NE = not estimable |
LIBRETTO-531
LIBRETTO-531 was a randomized (2:1), multicenter, open-label study (NCT04211337) in adults and adolescents with advance or metastatic RET-mutant MTC. The study evaluated the efficacy of RETEVMO versus physicians’ choice of cabozantinib or vandetanib in patients with progressive, advanced, kinase inhibitor naïve, RET-mutant medullary thyroid cancer.
Patients were randomized to receive either RETEVMO (160 mg twice daily) or physicians’ choice of cabozantinib (140 mg once daily) or vandetanib (300 mg once daily). Patients were stratified based on RET mutation (M918T vs. other) and intended treatment if randomized to the control arm (cabozantinib vs. vandetanib). The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), as determined by a blinded independent review committee (BIRC) according to RECIST v1.1.
The median age was 55 years (range: 12 to 84), 63% were male, 58% were White, 23% were Asian, 2.4% were Black or African American, and 17% had unknown race. ECOG performance status was 0-1 (98%) or 2 (1.0%) with 0.7% unknown status. 77% of patients had metastatic disease and 6 patients (2.1%) had received 1 prior systemic therapy. RET mutation status was detected in 90% of patients using NGS (89% tumor samples; 8% blood or plasma), and 10% using PCR. Of patients enrolled in LIBRETTO-531, 63% had M918T RET mutations and 37% had other RET mutations.
Efficacy results for LIBRETTO-531 based on the preplanned interim efficacy analysis are provided in Table 21 and Figure 2. At the time of this analysis, overall survival data were immature with 18 deaths observed (14% of pre-specified events).
Table 21: Efficacy Results in LIBRETTO-531: RETEVMO versus Cabozantinib or Vandetanib
|
RETEVMO
N = 193 |
Cabozantinib or Vandetanib
N = 98 |
| PFS |
| Number (%) of patients with an event |
26 (14%) |
33 (34%) |
| Median in months (95% CI) |
NR (NE, NE) |
16.8 (12.2, 25.1) |
| Hazard ratio (95% CI)1 |
0.280 (95% CI: 0.165, 0.475) |
| p-value2 |
<0.0001 |
| Overall Response Rate |
| ORR (95% CI) |
69% (62%, 76%) |
39% (29%, 49%) |
| Complete response |
12% |
4% |
| Partial response |
58% |
35% |
| Duration of Response |
| Median in months (95% CI) |
NR (NE, NE) |
16.6 (10.4, NE) |
| Median follow-up time (months) |
11.1 |
12.8 |
Data from the pre-planned interim efficacy analysis.
1 Based on the stratified Cox proportional hazard model.
2 Based on stratified log-rank test.
NR = Not reached; NE = not evaluable |
Figure 2: Kaplan-Meier Curves of Progression-Free Survival in LIBRETTO-531: RETEVMO versus Cabozantinib or Vandetanib
Patient-reported overall side effect impact was evaluated weekly in 222 patients (RETEVMO N = 145; cabozantinib or vandetanib N=77) who received at least one dose of treatment by at least 6 months prior to the data cutoff date and responded to the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy item GP5 (FACT GP5). Patient-reported overall side effect impact was derived as a proportion of time on treatment with high side effect bother (defined as response of 3 “Quite a bit” or 4 “Very much”) per FACT GP5.
Patient-reported overall side effect impact results for LIBRETTO-531 are provided in Table 22.
Table 22. Descriptive Summary of Patient-reported Overall Side Effect Impact While on Treatment in LIBRETTO-531
|
RETEVMO
(N=145) |
Cabozantinib or Vandetanib
(N=77) |
| Mean proportion of time with high side effect bother (95% CI) |
8% (4.8%, 10%) |
24% (17%, 31%) |
| % Patients with high side effect bother |
| 0% of time |
61% |
30% |
| ≤25% of time |
90% |
66% |
Patient-reported overall side effect impact results were supported by a lower incidence of treatment discontinuation due to adverse reactions for RETEVMO (4.7%) compared to cabozantinib or vandetanib (27%) in patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. The median time on treatment at the data cutoff was 14.5 months in the RETEVMO arm and 8.3 months in the cabozantinib or vandetanib arm in patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
LIBRETTO-121
The efficacy of RETEVMO was evaluated in pediatric and young adult patients with advanced RET-activated solid tumors enrolled in a multicenter, open-label, multi-cohort clinical trial (LIBRETTO-121, NCT03899792). Patients received RETEVMO 92 mg/m2 orally twice daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other reason for treatment discontinuation. Tumor assessments were performed every 8 weeks for one year, then every 12 weeks; responses were assessed according to RECIST 1.1 per BIRC.
Efficacy was evaluated in 14 patients with RET-mutant MTC who were non-responsive to available therapies or had no standard systemic curative therapy available. The median age was 14 years (range 2 to 20); 64% were male; 71% were White, 14% were Black or African American; and 14% were Hispanic/Latino. Patients had metastatic (71%) or locally advanced (29%) disease; 43% had measurable disease at baseline; 21% had received prior systemic therapy. RET-mutant status was detected in 79% of patients using NGS tumor samples and in 21% using PCR.
Efficacy results for RET-mutant MTC in pediatric and young adult patients are summarized in Table 23.
Table 23: Efficacy Results in LIBRETTO-121 (RET-Mutant MTC)
|
RETEVMO
(n = 14) |
| Overall Response Rate1 (95% CI) |
43% (18, 71) |
| Complete response |
7% |
| Partial response |
36% |
| Duration of Response |
| Median in months (95% CI) |
NR (NE, NE) |
| % with ≥12 months2 |
100% |
| % with ≥18 months2 |
67% |
1 Confirmed overall response rate assessed by BIRC.
2 Based on observed duration of response.
NR = not reached; NE = not estimable |
RET Fusion-Positive Thyroid Cancer
LIBRETTO-001
The efficacy of RETEVMO was evaluated in patients with advanced RET fusion-positive thyroid cancer enrolled in a multicenter, open-label, multi-cohort clinical trial (LIBRETTO-001, NCT03157128). Efficacy was evaluated in 65 patients with RET fusion-positive thyroid cancer who were radioactive iodine (RAI)-refractory (if RAI was an appropriate treatment option) and were systemic therapy naïve and patients who were previously treated, in separate cohorts.
The median age was 59 years (range 20 to 88); 49% were male; 65% were White, 20% were Asian, 4.6% were Black or African American; and 11% were Hispanic/Latino. ECOG performance status was 0-1 (94%) or 2 (6%). All (100%) patients had metastatic disease with primary tumor histologies including papillary thyroid cancer (83%), poorly differentiated thyroid cancer (9%), anaplastic thyroid cancer (6%) and Hurthle cell thyroid cancer (1.5%). Previously treated patients had received a median of 1 prior therapy (range 1–4). RET fusion-positive status was detected in 97% of patients using NGS (89% tumor samples; 8% blood or plasma samples), and 3% using other local testing methods.
Efficacy results for RET fusion-positive thyroid cancer are summarized in Table 24.
Table 24: Efficacy Results in LIBRETTO-001 (RET Fusion-Positive Thyroid Cancer)
|
RETEVMO
Previously Treated
(n = 41) |
RETEVMO
Systemic Therapy Naïve
(n = 24) |
| Overall Response Rate1 (95% CI) |
85% (71%, 94%) |
96% (79%, 100%) |
| Complete response |
12% |
21% |
| Partial response |
73% |
75% |
| Duration of Response |
| Median in months (95% CI) |
26.7 (12.1, NE) |
NE (42.8, NE) |
| % with ≥12 months2 |
54 |
65 |
1 Confirmed overall response rate assessed by BIRC.
2 Based on observed duration of response.
NE = not estimable |
Responses were observed in patients with each histology represented, including 3 of 4 patients with anaplastic thyroid cancer (all partial responses) and 6 of 6 patients with poorly differentiated thyroid cancer (1 complete response, 5 partial responses).
LIBRETTO-121
The efficacy of RETEVMO was evaluated in pediatric and young adult patients with advanced RET-activated solid tumors enrolled in a multicenter, open-label, multi-cohort clinical trial (LIBRETTO-121, NCT03899792) [see RET-Mutant Medullary Thyroid Cancer].
Efficacy was evaluated in 10 patients with RET fusion-positive thyroid cancer who were non-responsive to available therapies or had no standard systemic curative therapy available. The median age was 13.5 years (range 12 to 20); 60% were male; 40% were White, 50% were Asian; and 30% were Hispanic/Latino. All (100%) patients had metastatic disease and papillary thyroid cancer histology; 40% had measurable disease at baseline; 30% had received prior systemic therapy. RET fusion-positive status was detected in 90% of patients using NGS tumor samples and in 10% using FISH. Efficacy results for RET fusion-positive thyroid cancer in pediatric and young adult patients are summarized in Table 25.
Table 25: Efficacy Results in LIBRETTO-121 (RET Fusion-Positive Thyroid Cancer)
|
RETEVMO
(n = 10) |
| Overall Response Rate1 (95% CI) |
60% (26, 88) |
| Complete response |
30% |
| Partial response |
30% |
| Duration of Response |
| Median in months (95% CI) |
NR (NE, NE) |
| % with ≥12 months2 |
83% |
| % with ≥18 months2 |
50% |
1 Confirmed overall response rate assessed by BIRC.
2 Based on observed duration of response.
NR = not reached; NE = not estimable |
Other RET Fusion-Positive Solid Tumors
LIBRETTO-001
The efficacy of RETEVMO was evaluated in patients with locally advanced or metastatic RET fusion-positive solid tumors enrolled in a multicenter, open-label, multi-cohort clinical trial (LIBRETTO-001, NCT03157128). Efficacy was evaluated in 41 patients with RET fusion-positive tumors other than NSCLC and thyroid cancer with disease progression on or following prior systemic treatment or who had no satisfactory alternative treatment options.
The median age was 50 years (range 21 to 85), 54% were female, 68% were White, 24% were Asian, and 4.9% were Black; and 7% were Hispanic/Latino. ECOG performance status was 0-1 (95%) or 2 (5%) and 95% of patients had metastatic disease. Thirty-seven patients (90%) received prior systemic therapy (median 2 [range 0 – 9]; 32% received 3 or more). The most common cancers were pancreatic adenocarcinoma (27%), colorectal (24%), salivary (10%) and unknown primary (7%). RET fusion-positive status was detected in 97.6% of patients using NGS and 2.4% using FISH.
Efficacy results for RET fusion-positive solid tumors other than NSCLC and thyroid cancer are summarized in Table 26 and Table 27.
Table 26: Efficacy Results in LIBRETTO-001 (Other RET Fusion-Positive Solid Tumors)
|
RETEVMO
(n = 41) |
| Overall Response Rate1 (95% CI) |
44% (28, 60) |
| Complete response |
4.9% |
| Partial response |
39% |
| Duration of Response |
| Median in months (95% CI) |
24.5 (9.2, NE) |
| % with ≥6 months2 |
67% |
1 Confirmed overall response rate assessed by BIRC.
2 Based on observed duration of response.
NE = not estimable |
Table 27: Efficacy Results by Tumor Type in LIBRETTO-001 (Other RET Fusion-Positive Solid Tumors)
| Tumor Type |
Patients
(n = 41) |
ORR1,2 |
DOR
Range (months) |
|
|
n (%) |
95% CI |
|
| Pancreatic adenocarcinoma |
11 |
6 (55%) |
(23, 83) |
2.5, 38.3+ |
| Colorectal |
10 |
2 (20%) |
(2.5, 56) |
5.6, 13.3 |
| Salivary |
4 |
2 (50%) |
(7, 93) |
5.7, 28.8+ |
| Unknown primary |
3 |
1 (33%) |
(0.8, 91) |
9.2 |
| Breast |
2 |
PR, CR |
NA |
2.3+, 17.3 |
| Sarcoma (soft tissue) |
2 |
PR, SD |
NA |
14.9+ |
| Xanthogranuloma |
2 |
NE, NE |
NA |
NA |
| Carcinoid (bronchial) |
1 |
PR |
NA |
24.1+ |
| Carcinoma of the skin |
1 |
NE |
NA |
NA |
| Cholangiocarcinoma |
1 |
PR |
NA |
5.6+ |
| Ovarian |
1 |
PR |
NA |
14.5+ |
| Pulmonary carcinosarcoma |
1 |
NE |
NA |
NA |
| Rectal neuroendocrine |
1 |
NE |
NA |
NA |
| Small intestine |
1 |
CR |
NA |
24.5 |
+ denotes ongoing response.
1 Confirmed overall response rate assessed by BIRC.
2 Best overall response for each patient is presented for tumor types with ≤2 patients.
CI = confidence interval, CR = complete response, DOR = duration of response, NA = not applicable, NE = not evaluable,
ORR = overall response rate, PR = partial response, SD = stable disease. |
LIBRETTO-121
The efficacy of RETEVMO was evaluated in pediatric and young adult patients with advanced RET-activated solid tumors enrolled in a multicenter, open-label, multi-cohort clinical trial (LIBRETTO-121, NCT03899792) [see RET-Mutant Medullary Thyroid Cancer].
Efficacy was evaluated in one patient with locally advanced refractory RET-fusion positive malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor who did not respond. Responses were observed in patients with RET fusion-positive thyroid cancer [see RET Fusion-Positive Thyroid Cancer].