Clinical Pharmacology for Relistor
Mechanism Of Action
Methylnaltrexone is a selective antagonist of opioid binding at the mu-opioid receptor. As a quaternary amine, the ability of methylnaltrexone to cross the blood-brain barrier is restricted. This allows methylnaltrexone to function as a peripherally-acting mu-opioid receptor antagonist in tissues such as the gastrointestinal tract, thereby decreasing the constipating effects of opioids without impacting opioid-mediated analgesic effects on the central nervous system (CNS).
Pharmacodynamics
Cardiac Electrophysiology
In a randomized, double-blind placebo- and (open-label) moxifloxacin-controlled 4-period crossover study, 56 healthy subjects were administered methylnaltrexone bromide 0.3 mg/kg and methylnaltrexone bromide 0.64 mg/kg by intravenous infusion over 20 minutes (RELISTOR is not approved for intravenous use), placebo, and a single oral dose of moxifloxacin. At a dose approximately 4.3 times the maximum recommended dose (7.5 times the mean peak plasma concentration for RELISTOR injection and 22 times the peak plasma concentration for RELISTOR tablets), methylnaltrexone does not prolong the QTc interval to any clinically relevant extent.
Pharmacokinetics
Between the oral dosage range of 150 mg to 450 mg for RELISTOR tablets and the subcutaneous dosage range of 0.15 mg/kg to 0.50 mg/kg for RELISTOR injection, the mean Cmax and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of methylnaltrexone increased in a dose-proportional manner. There was no significant accumulation of methylnaltrexone following once-daily oral dosing of 450 mg RELISTOR tablets or subcutaneous dosing of 12 mg RELISTOR injection for seven consecutive days in healthy subjects.
Absorption
Tablets
Following administration of a single 450 mg dose of RELISTOR tablets in OIC patients or healthy subjects, peak concentrations (Cmax) of methylnaltrexone were observed at approximately 1.5 hours. The absolute bioavailability of oral methylnaltrexone bromide has not been determined. The Cmax and AUC in healthy subjects were 48.1 ng/mL and 382 ng·hr/mL, respectively, following a single 450 mg dose of RELISTOR tablets. Exposure in the OIC patient population was approximately 27% lower than in healthy subjects.
Food Effect
Administration of a single 450 mg dose of RELISTOR tablets to healthy subjects with a high-fat breakfast (containing approximately 800 to 1000 total calories, with 60%, 25% and 15% of calories derived from fat, carbohydrate and protein, respectively) resulted in a decrease in the Cmax of methylnaltrexone by 60%, the AUC by 43% and delayed the Tmax by 2 hours [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION].
Injection
Following administration of RELISTOR injection subcutaneously, methylnaltrexone achieved peak concentrations (Cmax) at approximately 0.5 hours (see Table 7).
Table 7: Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Methylnaltrexone Following Subcutaneous Doses
| Parameter |
0.15 mg/kg
Single Dose |
12 mg
Single Dose |
12 mg
at Steady-State |
| Cmax (ng/mL) |
117 (32.7) |
140 (35.6) |
119 (27.2) |
| Tmax(hr) |
0.5 (0.25 to 0.75) |
0.25 (0.25 to 0.5) |
0.25 (0.25 to 0.5) |
| AUC 24(ng·hr/mL) |
175 (36.6) |
218 (28.3) |
223(28.2) |
Distribution
The steady-state volume of distribution (Vss) of methylnaltrexone is approximately 1.1 L/kg. The fraction of methylnaltrexone bound to human plasma proteins is 11% to 15%, as determined by equilibrium dialysis.
Elimination
Following oral administration of a single 450 mg dose of RELISTOR tablets, concentrations of methylnaltrexone declined in multiphasic manner with a terminal halflife (t1/2) of approximately 15 hours.
Metabolism
In an intravenous mass balance study, approximately 44% of the administered radioactivity was recovered in the urine over 24 hours with 5 distinct metabolites. None of the detected metabolites was in amounts over 6% of administered radioactivity. Conversion to methyl-6-naltrexol isomers (5% of total) and methylnaltrexone sulfate (1% of total) appear to be the primary pathways of metabolism. N-demethylation of methylnaltrexone to produce naltrexone is not significant.
Systemic exposure of methylnaltrexone metabolites after oral administration of a single 450 mg dose of RELISTOR tablets are greater than the systemic exposure of methylnaltrexone metabolites after subcutaneous administration of a single 12 mg dose of RELISTOR injection. Subcutaneous administration is not subject to first-pass hepatic metabolism prior to appearance in the systemic circulation. After 12 mg subcutaneous once daily dosing the mean AUC0-24 ratio of metabolites to methylnaltrexone at steady-state was 30%, 19%, and 9% for methylnaltrexone sulfate, methyl-6α-naltrexol, and methyl-6ß-naltrexol, respectively. After 450 mg oral once daily dosing, the ratio of the mean AUC0-24 of metabolites to methylnaltrexone at steady-state was 79%, 38%, and 21% for methylnaltrexone sulfate, methyl-6α- naltrexol, and methyl-6ß-naltrexol, respectively. Methylnaltrexone sulfate is a weak mu-opioid receptor antagonist; methyl-6α-naltrexol, and methyl-6ß-naltrexol are active mu-opioid receptor antagonists.
Methylnaltrexone is conjugated by sulfotransferase SULT1E1 and SULT2A1 isoforms to methylnaltrexone sulfate. Conversion to methyl-6-naltrexol isomers is mediated by aldo-keto reductase 1C enzymes.
Excretion
In an intravenous mass balance study, approximately half of the dose was excreted in the urine (54%), and 17% of administered dose was excreted in the feces up to 168 hours postdose; however, radiolabeled recovery in this study was only 71% after 7 days. Methylnaltrexone is excreted primarily as the unchanged drug in the urine and feces. Active renal secretion of methylnaltrexone is suggested by renal clearance of methylnaltrexone that is approximately 4- to 5-fold higher than creatinine clearance.
No mass balance clinical studies were conducted with oral administration of methylnaltrexone bromide. However, following once daily dosing of 450 mg RELISTOR tablets for 1 week, the percentage of dose recovered in the urine as the parent methylnaltrexone was low (approximately 1% on both Day 1 and Day 7).
Specific Populations
Age
Geriatric Population
A study was conducted to characterize the pharmacokinetics of methylnaltrexone after a single dose of 24 mg methylnaltrexone bromide via intravenous infusion over 20 min in healthy adults between 18 and 45 years of age and in healthy adults aged 65 years and older. In elderly subjects (mean age 72 years old), mean clearance was about 20% lower (56 L/h versus 70 L/h) and AUC∞ was 26% higher than in subjects between 18 and 45 years of age (mean age 30 years old) [see Use In Specific Populations].
Renal Impairment
Administration of a single subcutaneous dose of 0.3 mg/kg of RELISTOR injection in subjects with varying degrees of renal impairment (8 subjects each cohort) resulted in a 1.3-, 1.7- and 1.9-fold higher AUC0-∞ of methylnaltrexone, respectively, compared to 8 subjects with normal renal function [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION]. The mean Cmax did not change significantly with renal impairment. No studies were performed in patients with end-stage renal impairment requiring dialysis.
Hepatic Impairment
Administration of a single 450 mg dose of RELISTOR tablets in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment (6 subjects each of Child-Pugh Class A, B, and C) resulted in a 1.7-, 4.8- and 3.8-fold higher Cmax of methylnaltrexone, respectively, compared to 6 subjects with normal liver function. The AUC0-∞, was comparable between healthy subjects and subjects with mild hepatic impairment, but increased approximately 2.1-fold in subjects with moderate and severe hepatic impairment [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION].
Administration of a single dose of 0.3 mg/kg of RELISTOR injection subcutaneously in 8 subjects with mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class A) and 8 subjects with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class B) did not result in any meaningful change in the AUC or Cmax when compared to 8 healthy subjects with normal hepatic function. The effect of severe (Child-Pugh Class C) hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of RELISTOR injection has not been studied [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION , Use In Specific Populations].
Drug Interaction Studies
Effect Of Methylnaltrexone And Its Metabolites On CYP Enzymes
In vitro, methylnaltrexone did not significantly inhibit or induce the activity of cytochrome P450 (CYP) isozymes CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, or CYP3A4. In addition, methylnaltrexone did not induce CYP2E1.
In vitro, the methylnaltrexone metabolites, methylnaltrexone sulfate, methyl-6α-naltrexol and methyl-6β-naltrexol did not inhibit CYP isozymes CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, or CYP3A4. The metabolites of methylnaltrexone did not induce activity of CYP1A2, CYP2B6, or CYP3A4.
Effect Of Methylnaltrexone And Its Metabolites On Transporters
Based on the in vitro studies, methylnaltrexone and its three major metabolites, methylnaltrexone sulfate, methyl-6α-naltrexol and methyl-6β-naltrexol, are unlikely to have clinically meaningful in vivo drug-drug interactions via inhibition of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP), Multidrug Resistance Protein 2 (MRP2), Organic Anion-Transporting Polypeptide (OATP)1B1, OATP1B3, Organic Cation Transporter (OCT)1, OCT2, Organic Anion Transporter (OAT)1, OAT3, Multidrug and Toxic Extrusion Transporter (MATE)1 and MATE2-K at the recommended dosage of 450 mg orally or 12 mg subcutaneously once daily.
Methylnaltrexone
Methylnaltrexone was a substrate of OCT1, OCT2, MATE1, and MATE2-K, but not a substrate for P-gp, BCRP, MRP2, OATP1B1, OATP1B3, OAT1 and OAT3.
Methylnaltrexone sulfate
Methylnaltrexone sulfate was a substrate for MATE2-K and a potential substrate of BCRP, but was not a substrate of P-gp, MRP2, OATP1B1, OATP1B3, OCT1, OCT2, OAT1, OAT3, and MATE1.
Methyl-6α-naltrexol
Methyl-6α-naltrexol was a substrate of BCRP, OCT1, OCT2, MATE1, and MATE2-K, but was not a substrate of P-gp, MRP2, OATP1B1, OATP1B3, OAT1 and OAT3.
Methyl-6ß-naltrexol
Methyl-6β-naltrexol was a substrate of OCT1, OCT2, MATE1, and MATE2-K, but was not a substrate of P-gp, BCRP, MRP2, OATP1B1, OATP1B3, OAT1 and OAT3.
Cimetidine
A clinical drug interaction study in healthy adult subjects evaluated the effects of cimetidine, a drug that inhibits the active renal secretion of organic cations, on the pharmacokinetics of methylnaltrexone (24 mg administered as an intravenous infusion over 20 minutes). A single dose of methylnaltrexone bromide was administered before cimetidine dosing and with the last dose of cimetidine (400 mg every 8 hours for 6 days). Mean Cmax and AUC of methylnaltrexone increased by 10% with concomitant cimetidine administration. The renal clearance of methylnaltrexone decreased about 40%. This change is not considered to be clinically meaningful.
Animal Toxicology And/Or Pharmacology
In an in vitro human cardiac potassium ion channel (hERG) assay, methylnaltrexone caused concentration-dependent inhibition of hERG current (1%, 12%, 13% and 40% inhibition at 30, 100, 300 and 1000 micromolar concentrations, respectively). Methylnaltrexone had a hERG IC50 of more than 1000 micromolar. In isolated dog Purkinje fibers, methylnaltrexone caused prolongations in action potential duration (APD). The highest tested concentration (10 micromolar) in the dog Purkinje fiber study was about 18 and 37 times the Cmax at human subcutaneous doses of 0.3 and 0.15 mg/kg, respectively. In isolated rabbit Purkinje fibers, methylnaltrexone (up to 100 micromolar) did not have an effect on APD, compared to vehicle control. The highest methylnaltrexone concentration (100 micromolar) tested was about 186 and 373 times the human Cmax at subcutaneous doses of 0.3 and 0.15 mg/kg, respectively. In anesthetized dogs, methylnaltrexone bromide caused decreases in blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, left ventricular pressure, left ventricular end diastolic pressure, and +dP/dt at 1 mg/kg or more. In conscious dogs, methylnaltrexone bromide caused a dose-related increase in QTc interval. After a single intravenous dosage of 20 mg/kg to beagle dogs, predicted Cmax and AUC values were approximately 482 and 144 times, respectively, the exposure at human subcutaneous dose of 0.15 mg/kg and 241 times and 66 times, respectively, the exposure at a human subcutaneous dose of 0.3 mg/kg. In conscious guinea pigs, methylnaltrexone bromide caused mild prolongation of QTc (4% over baseline) at 20 mg/kg, intravenous. A thorough QTc assessment was conducted in humans [see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY].
In juvenile rats administered intravenous methylnaltrexone bromide for 13 weeks, adverse clinical signs such as convulsions, tremors and labored breathing occurred at dosages of 3 and 10 mg/kg/day (about 2.4 and 8 times, respectively, the subcutaneous MRHD of 12 mg/day; about 0.06 and 0.22 times, respectively, the oral MRHD of 450 mg/day). Similar adverse clinical signs were seen in adult rats at 20 mg/kg/day (about 16 times the subcutaneous MRHD of 12 mg/day; about 0.43 times the oral MRHD of 450 mg/day). Juvenile rats were found to be more sensitive to the toxicity of methylnaltrexone bromide when compared to adults. The no observed adverse effect levels (NOAELs) in juvenile and adult rats were 1 and 5 mg/kg/day, respectively (about 0.8 and 4 times, respectively, the subcutaneous MRHD of 12 mg/day; about 0.02 and 0.11 times, respectively, the oral MRHD of 450 mg/day).
Juvenile dogs administered intravenous methylnaltrexone bromide for 13 weeks had a toxicity profile similar to adult dogs. Following intravenous administration of methylnaltrexone bromide for 13 weeks, decreased heart rate (13.2% reduction compared to pre-dose) in juvenile dogs and prolonged QTc interval in juvenile (9.6% compared to control) and adult (up to 15% compared to control) dogs occurred at 20 mg/kg/day (about 54 times the subcutaneous MRHD of 12 mg/day; about 1.5 times the oral MRHD of 450 mg/day). Clinical signs consistent with effects on the CNS (including tremors and decreased activity) occurred in both juvenile and adult dogs. The NOAELs in juvenile and adult dogs were 5 mg/kg/day (about 14 times the subcutaneous MRHD of 12 mg/day; about 0.4 times the oral MRHD of 450 mg/day).
Clinical Studies
Opioid-Induced Constipation In Adult Patients With Chronic Non-Cancer Pain
RELISTOR Tablets
The efficacy of RELISTOR tablets in the treatment of OIC in patients with chronic non-cancer pain was evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (Study 1). This study compared 4-week treatment of RELISTOR tablets 450 mg orally once daily with placebo.
A total of 401 patients (200 RELISTOR, 201 placebo) were enrolled and treated in the double-blind period. Patients had a history of chronic non-cancer pain for which they were taking opioids. The most common pain condition requiring opioid use was back pain. Other frequently reported primary pain conditions were arthritis, neurologic/neuropathic pain, joint/extremity pain, and fibromyalgia. Prior to screening, patients were receiving opioid therapy for pain for 1 month or longer (median daily baseline oral morphine equivalent dose of 156 mg) and had OIC (less than 3 spontaneous bowel movements per week during the screening period). Constipation due to opioid use had to be associated with 1 or more of the following: A Bristol Stool Form Scale score of 1 or 2 for at least 25% of the bowel movements (BM), straining during at least 25% of the BMs or a sensation of incomplete evacuation after at least 25% of the BMs.
Patients were required to be on a stable opioid regimen (daily dose 50 mg or more of oral morphine equivalents per day) a minimum of 2 weeks prior to the screening visit and received their opioid medication during the study as clinically needed. The median duration of OIC at baseline was 53 months (4 years). The mean patient age was 52 years (range 23 to 78 years), 64% were female, and 84% of patients were Caucasian.
Eligible patients were required to discontinue all previous laxative therapy and use only the study-permitted rescue laxative (bisacodyl tablets). If patients did not have a bowel movement for 3 consecutive days during the study, they were permitted to use rescue medication (up to 3 bisacodyl tablets taken orally once during a 24-hour period). Bisacodyl tablets were taken 5 hours or longer and up to 8 hours after study drug administration. If rescue treatment with bisacodyl tablets did not result in a bowel movement, a second dose of bisacodyl or an enema 24 hours after rescue was permitted. Enema use was permitted after rescue with bisacodyl tablets had failed at least once.
A responder analysis was performed which defined the proportion of patients with 3 or more spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs)/week, with an increase of 1 or more SBM/week over baseline, for 3 or more out of the first 4 weeks of the treatment period. A SBM was defined as a bowel movement that occurred without laxative use during the previous 24 hours. Table 8 presents the proportion of patients who responded during the double-blind treatment period in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, which included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of double-blind study medication.
Table 8: Proportion of Responders in the ITT Population in Study 1 of RELISTOR Tablets for the Treatment of OIC in Patients with Chronic Non-Cancer
| Treatment |
N |
n (%) |
Percent Differenceª
(2-sided 95% CI) |
| RELISTOR Tablets 450 mg Once Daily |
200 |
103 (52%) |
13% |
| Placebo |
201 |
77 (38%) |
(3%, 23%) |
CI = confidence interval; ITT = intent-to-treat;
aDifference for active treatment vs. placebo;
*A responder is defined as a patient with 3 or more SBMs/week, with an increase of 1 or more SBM/week over baseline, for 3 or more out of the first 4 weeks of the treatment period. |
RELISTOR Injection
The efficacy of RELISTOR injection in the treatment of OIC in patients with chronic non-cancer pain were evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (Study 2). This study compared 4-week treatment of RELISTOR injection 12 mg administered subcutaneously once daily with placebo.
A total of 312 patients (150 RELISTOR, 162 placebo) were enrolled and treated in the double-blind period. Patients had a history of chronic non-cancer pain for which they were taking opioids. The majority of patients had a primary diagnosis of back pain; other primary diagnoses included joint/extremity pain, fibromyalgia, neurologic/neuropathic pain, and rheumatoid arthritis. Prior to screening, patients had been receiving opioid therapy for pain for 1 month or longer (median daily baseline oral morphine equivalent dose of 161 mg) and had OIC (less than 3 spontaneous bowel movements per week during the screening period). Constipation due to opioid use had to be associated with 1 or more of the following: A Bristol Stool Form Scale score of 1 or 2 for at least 25% of the bowel movements (BM), straining during at least 25% of the BMs or a sensation of incomplete evacuation after at least 25% of the BMs.
Patients were required to be on a stable opioid regimen (daily dose 50 mg or more of oral morphine equivalents per day) for at least 2 weeks before the screening visit and received their opioid medication during the study as clinically needed. The median duration of OIC at baseline was 59 months (5 years). The median patient age at baseline was 49 years, 62% were females and 90% were Caucasian.
Eligible patients were required to discontinue all previous laxative therapy and use only the study-permitted rescue laxative (bisacodyl tablets). If patients did not have a bowel movement for 3 consecutive days during the study, they were permitted to use rescue medication (up to 4 bisacodyl tablets taken orally once during a 24-hour period). Rescue laxatives were prohibited until at least 4 hours after taking an injection of study medication.
A responder analysis was performed which defined the proportion of patients with 3 or more (SBMs) per week for each of the 4 weeks of the double-blind period. A SBM was defined as a bowel movement that occurred without laxative use during the previous 24 hours. Table 9 presents the proportion of patients who responded during the double-blind treatment period in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, which included all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of double-blind study medication.
Table 9: Proportion of Responders* in the mITT Population in Study 2 of RELISTOR Injection for the Treatment of OIC in Patients with Chronic Non- Cancer Pain
| Treatment |
N |
n (%) |
Percent Differenceª
(2-sided 95% CI) |
P-valueb |
| RELISTOR Injection 12 mg Once Daily |
150 |
88 (59%) |
20%
(10%, 31%) |
<0.001 |
| Placebo |
162 |
62 (38%) |
| CI = confidence interval; mITT= intent-to-treat; |
Opioid-Induced Constipation In Adult Patients With Advanced Illness
The efficacy of RELISTOR injection in the treatment of OIC in advanced illness patients receiving palliative care was demonstrated in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. In these studies, the median age was 68 years (range 21 to 100 years); 51% were females. In both studies, patients had advanced illness and received care to control their symptoms. The majority of patients had a primary diagnosis of incurable cancer; other primary diagnoses included end-stage COPD/emphysema, cardiovascular disease/heart failure, Alzheimer's disease/dementia, HIV/AIDS, or other advanced illnesses. Prior to screening, patients had been receiving palliative opioid therapy (median daily baseline oral morphine equivalent dose of 172 mg), and had OIC (either less than 3 bowel movements in the preceding week or no bowel movement for 2 or more days). Patients were on a stable opioid regimen 3 or more days prior to randomization (not including PRN or rescue pain medication) and received their opioid medication during the study as clinically needed. Patients maintained their regular laxative regimen for at least 3 days prior to study entry, and throughout the study. Rescue laxatives were prohibited from 4 hours before to 4 hours after taking an injection of study medication.
Study 4 was a double-blind, placebo-controlled study which compared a single, subcutaneous dose of RELISTOR injection 0.15 mg/kg, and RELISTOR injection 0.3 mg/kg versus placebo. The double-blind dose was followed by an open-label 4–week dosing period, where RELISTOR injection could be used as needed, no more frequently than one dose in a 24-hour period. Throughout both study periods, patients maintained their regular laxative regimen. A total of 154 patients (47 RELISTOR 0.15 mg/kg, 55 RELISTOR 0.3 mg/kg, 52 placebo) were enrolled and treated in the double-blind period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a rescue-free laxation within 4 hours of the double-blind dose of study medication. RELISTOR-treated patients had a significantly higher rate of laxation within 4 hours of the double-blind dose (62% for 0.15 mg/kg and 58% for 0.3 mg/kg) than did placebo–treated patients (14%); p <0.0001 for each dose versus placebo (Figure 1).
Study 5 was a double-blind, placebo-controlled study which compared subcutaneous doses of RELISTOR injection given every other day for 2 weeks versus placebo. Patients received opioid medication for at least 2 weeks prior to receiving study medication. During the first week (Days 1, 3, 5, 7) patients received either 0.15 mg/kg RELISTOR injection or placebo. In the second week the patient’s assigned dose could be increased to 0.3 mg/kg if the patient had 2 or fewer rescue-free laxations up to Day 8. At any time, the patient's assigned dose could be reduced based on tolerability. Data from 133 (62 RELISTOR, 71 placebo) patients were analyzed. There were 2 primary endpoints: proportion of patients with a rescue-free laxation within 4 hours of the first dose of study medication and proportion of patients with a rescue-free laxation within 4 hours after at least 2 of the first 4 doses of study medication. RELISTOR-treated patients had a higher rate of laxation within 4 hours of the first dose (48%) than placebo-treated patients (16%); p <0.0001 (Figure 1). RELISTOR-treated patients also had significantly higher rates of laxation within 4 hours after at least 2 of the first 4 doses (52%) than did placebo-treated patients (9%); p <0.0001. In both studies, in approximately 30% of patients, laxation was reported within 30 minutes of a dose of RELISTOR.
Figure 1: Laxation Response within 4 Hours of the First Dose in Studies 4 and 5
In both studies, there was no evidence of differential effects of age or gender on safety or efficacy. No meaningful subgroup analysis could be conducted on race because the study population was predominantly Caucasian (88%).
Durability Of Response
Durability of response was explored in Study 5, and the laxation response rate was consistent from dose 1 through dose 7 over the course of the 2-week, double-blind period.
The efficacy of RELISTOR injection was also demonstrated in open-label treatment administered from Day 2 through Week 4 in Study 4, and in two open-label extension studies (Study 4 EXT and Study 5 EXT) in which RELISTOR was given as needed for up to 4 months. During open-label treatment, patients maintained their regular laxative regimen. A total of 136, 21, and 82 patients received at least one open-label dose in Studies 4, 4 EXT, and 5 EXT, respectively. Laxation response was also explored in this open-label setting and appeared to be maintained over the course of 3 to 4 months of open-label treatment.
Opioid Use And Pain Scores
No relationship between baseline opioid dose and laxation response in RELISTOR-treated patients was identified in exploratory analyses of these studies. In addition, median daily opioid dose did not vary meaningfully from baseline in either RELISTOR-treated patients or in placebo–treated patients. There were no clinically relevant changes in pain scores from baseline in either the RELISTOR or placebo-treated patients.