Warnings for Relenza
Included as part of the "PRECAUTIONS" Section
Precautions for Relenza
Bronchospasm
RELENZA is not recommended for treatment or prophylaxis of influenza in individuals with underlying airways disease (such as asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease).
Serious cases of bronchospasm, including fatalities, have been reported during treatment with RELENZA in patients with and without underlying airways disease. Many of these cases were reported during postmarketing and causality was difficult to assess.
RELENZA should be discontinued in any patient who develops bronchospasm or decline in respiratory function; immediate treatment and hospitalization may be required.
Some patients without prior pulmonary disease may also have respiratory abnormalities from acute respiratory infection that could resemble adverse drug reactions or increase patient vulnerability to adverse drug reactions.
Bronchospasm was documented following administration of zanamivir in 1 of 13 subjects with mild or moderate asthma (but without acute influenza-like illness) in a Phase 1 trial. In a Phase 3 trial in subjects with acute influenza-like illness superimposed on underlying asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 10% (24 of 244) of subjects on zanamivir and 9% (22 of 237) on placebo experienced a greater than 20% decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) following treatment for 5 days.
If use of RELENZA is considered for a patient with underlying airways disease, the potential risks and benefits should be carefully weighed. If a decision is made to prescribe RELENZA for such a patient, this should be done only under conditions of careful monitoring of respiratory function, close observation, and appropriate supportive care, including availability of fast-acting bronchodilators.
Allergic Reactions
Allergic-like reactions, including oropharyngeal edema, serious skin rashes, and anaphylaxis have been reported in postmarketing experience with RELENZA. RELENZA should be stopped and appropriate treatment instituted if an allergic reaction occurs or is suspected.
Neuropsychiatric Events
Influenza can be associated with a variety of neurologic and behavioral symptoms which can include events such as seizures, hallucinations, delirium, and abnormal behavior, in some cases resulting in fatal outcomes. These events may occur in the setting of encephalitis or encephalopathy but can occur without obvious severe disease.
There have been postmarketing reports of delirium and abnormal behavior leading to injury in patients with influenza who were receiving neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs), including RELENZA. Because these events were reported voluntarily during clinical practice, estimates of frequency cannot be made, but they appear to be uncommon based on usage data for RELENZA. These events were reported primarily among pediatric patients and often had an abrupt onset and rapid resolution. The contribution of RELENZA to these events has not been established. Patients with influenza should be closely monitored for signs of abnormal behavior. If neuropsychiatric symptoms occur, the risks and benefits of continuing treatment should be evaluated for each patient.
Limitations Of Populations Studied
Safety and efficacy have not been demonstrated in patients with high-risk underlying medical conditions. No information is available regarding treatment of influenza in patients with any medical condition sufficiently severe or unstable to be considered at imminent risk of requiring inpatient management.
Bacterial Infections
Serious bacterial infections may begin with influenza-like symptoms or may coexist with or occur as complications during the course of influenza. RELENZA has not been shown to prevent such complications.
Importance Of Proper Route Of Administration
RELENZA inhalation powder must not be made into an extemporaneous solution for administration by nebulization or mechanical ventilation. There have been reports of hospitalized patients with influenza who received a solution made with RELENZA inhalation powder administered by nebulization or mechanical ventilation, including a fatal case where it was reported that the lactose in this formulation obstructed the proper functioning of the equipment. RELENZA inhalation powder must only be administered using the device provided [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION].
Importance Of Proper Use Of DISKHALER
Effective and safe use of RELENZA requires proper use of the DISKHALER to inhale the drug. Prescribers should carefully evaluate the ability of young children to use the delivery system if use of RELENZA is considered [see Use In Specific Populations].
Patient Counseling Information
Advise the patient to read the FDA-approved patient labeling (PATIENT INFORMATION and INSTRUCTION FOR USE).
Bronchospasm
Inform patients of the risk of bronchospasm, especially in the setting of underlying airways disease, and advise patients to stop RELENZA and contact their healthcare provider if they experience increased respiratory symptoms during treatment such as worsening wheezing, shortness of breath, or other signs or symptoms of bronchospasm [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS]. If a decision is made to prescribe RELENZA for a patient with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, the patient should be made aware of the risks and should have a fast-acting bronchodilator available.
Concomitant Bronchodilator Use
Patients scheduled to take inhaled bronchodilators at the same time as RELENZA should be advised to use their bronchodilators before taking RELENZA.
Neuropsychiatric Events
Inform patients with influenza (the flu), particularly children and adolescents, they may be at an increased risk of seizures, confusion, or abnormal behavior early in their illness. These events may occur after beginning RELENZA or may occur when flu is not treated. These events are uncommon but may result in accidental injury to the patient. Therefore, patients should be observed for signs of unusual behavior and a healthcare professional should be contacted immediately if the patient shows any signs of unusual behavior [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS].
Risk Of Influenza Transmission To Others
Inform patients that the use of RELENZA for treatment of influenza has not been shown to reduce the risk of transmission of influenza to others.
Missed Dose
Instruct patients that if they miss a dose of RELENZA, to take it as soon as they remember. If it is 2 hours or less before their next dose, instruct patients not to take the missed dose and to take the next dose of RELENZA at the next scheduled time. Advise patients not to double their next dose or take more than the prescribed dose.
Instructions For Use
Instruct patients in use of the delivery system. Instructions should include a demonstration whenever possible. For the proper use of RELENZA, the patient should read and follow carefully the accompanying Instructions for Use.
If RELENZA is prescribed for children, it should be used only under adult supervision and instruction, and the supervising adult should first be instructed by a healthcare professional [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION].
Trademarks are owned by or licensed to the GSK group of companies.
Nonclinical Toxicology
Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment Of Fertility
Carcinogenesis
In 2-year carcinogenicity studies conducted in rats and mice using a powder formulation administered through inhalation, zanamivir induced no statistically significant increases in tumors over controls. The maximum daily exposures in rats and mice were approximately 23 to 25 and 20 to 22 times, respectively, greater than those in humans at the proposed clinical dose based on AUC comparisons.
Mutagenesis
Zanamivir was not mutagenic in in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity assays which included bacterial mutation assays in S. typhimurium and E. coli, mammalian mutation assays in mouse lymphoma, chromosomal aberration assays in human peripheral blood lymphocytes, and the in vivo mouse bone marrow micronucleus assay.
Impairment Of Fertility
Zanamivir did not impair mating or fertility of male or female rats and did not affect the sperm of treated male rats dosed for 10 weeks prior to mating and throughout mating, gestation/lactation, and shortly after weaning, and female rats dosed for 3 weeks prior to mating through organogenesis or lactation, at intravenous (IV) doses 1, 9, and 90 mg/kg/day, resulting in systemic drug exposures (AUC) estimated to be up to 300 times higher than the MRHID.
Use In Specific Populations
Pregnancy
Risk Summary
Available data from published studies suggest that use of RELENZA during pregnancy is not associated with an increased risk of birth defects or adverse maternal or fetal outcomes.
However, these studies are limited by their small sample sizes, which preclude a definitive assessment of the risk (see Data). There are risks to the mother and fetus associated with influenza infection in pregnancy (see Clinical Considerations). In animal reproduction studies, no adverse developmental effects were observed with intravenous or subcutaneous administration of zanamivir at exposures 300 and 150 times, respectively, the systemic exposure at the maximum recommended human inhalation dose (MRHID) of 10 mg twice daily (see Data).
The background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated population is unknown. All pregnancies have a background risk of birth defect, loss, or other adverse outcomes. In the U.S. general population, the background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2% to 4% and 15% to 20%, respectively.
Clinical Considerations
Disease-Associated Maternal and/or Embryo/Fetal Risk
Pregnant women are at higher risk of severe complications from influenza, which may lead to adverse pregnancy and/or fetal outcomes, including maternal death, stillbirths, birth defects, preterm delivery, low birth weight, and small for gestational age.
Data
Human Data
A study of population-based registers from Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and France reported outcomes of 5,824 pregnant women who filled a prescription for an NAI compared with outcomes in unexposed pregnant women in the general population. This study included 1,560 women who filled a prescription for zanamivir (including 321 first trimester exposures). Although no specific analyses were conducted for zanamivir, exposure to the NAI class in utero was not associated with major birth defects, preterm birth, low birth weight, small for gestational age, still birth, neonatal morbidity, or neonatal mortality.
A few published studies compared outcomes of pregnant women exposed to zanamivir with outcomes in various comparator cohorts. These studies suggested no increased risk of major birth defects, preterm birth, or low birth weight. Sample sizes in these studies ranged from 50 to 180 pregnant women exposed to zanamivir, including 15 to 44 women exposed in the first trimester. Limitations of available studies include the lack of specific analyses for zanamivir, possible exposure and outcome misclassification, and small sample sizes. These limitations preclude a definitive assessment of the risk.
Animal Data
Zanamivir was administered intravenously to pregnant rats and rabbits at 1, 9, or 90 mg/kg/day during organogenesis (gestation Day 6 to 15 [rat] and 7 to 19 [rabbit]). No adverse maternal or embryo-fetal effects were observed up to the highest intravenous dose of zanamivir (90 mg/kg/day), resulting in systemic drug exposure (AUC) estimated from both rats and rabbits, 300 times the exposure at the MRHID. In a separate study, zanamivir was administered subcutaneously to pregnant rats at 3, 27, and 240 mg/kg/day in three divided doses during organogenesis (gestation Day 7 to 17). An increased incidence of skeletal and visceral alterations and variants was observed at the high dose (240 mg/kg/day). No adverse maternal or embryofetal effects were observed at the middle dose (27 mg/kg/day), resulting in systemic drug exposure (AUC) 150 times the exposure at the MRHID.
In prenatal and postnatal development studies in rats, zanamivir was administered intravenously at 1, 9, or 90 mg/kg/day during organogenesis (gestation Day 0 to 19) or from late gestation through delivery and lactation (gestation Day 16 to post-partum/lactation Day 21). No significant effects were observed in the offspring at systemic drug exposures (AUC) estimated to be 300 times the exposure at the MRHID.
Zanamivir distributed across the placenta in pregnant rats and rabbits, with less than 0.04% of the administered maternal dose being recovered from the fetus on gestation Day 12.
Lactation
Risk Summary
There are no data on the presence of zanamivir in human milk or the effects on milk production. There are data from adults that have shown low oral bioavailability of zanamivir. Limited data from postmarketing case reports have not suggested a safety concern in infants exposed to breast milk of mothers using RELENZA. Zanamivir was present in the milk of lactating rats without effect on nursing pups (see Data). The developmental and health benefits of breastfeeding should be considered along with the mother’s clinical need for RELENZA and any potential adverse effects on the breastfed child from RELENZA or the underlying maternal condition.
Data
In a lactation study, zanamivir was excreted in the milk of lactating rats administered zanamivir intravenously (10 mg/kg) on post-partum/lactation Day 10, with peak milk concentrations of approximately 10% that of maternal plasma concentrations occurring 30 minutes post-dose. No effects of zanamivir on growth and postnatal development were observed in nursing pups at the highest intravenous dose tested in rats. Maternal systemic exposure (AUC) of zanamivir was approximately 300 times the exposure in humans at the MRHID.
Pediatric Use
Treatment Of Influenza
Safety and effectiveness of RELENZA for treatment of influenza have not been assessed in pediatric patients younger than 7 years, but were studied in a Phase 3 treatment trial in pediatric subjects, where 471 children aged 5 to 12 years received zanamivir or placebo [see Clinical Studies]. Adolescents were included in the 3 principal Phase 3 adult treatment trials. In these trials, 67 patients were aged 12 to 16 years. No definite differences in safety and efficacy were observed between these adolescent patients and young adults.
In a Phase 1 trial of 16 children aged 6 to 12 years with signs and symptoms of respiratory disease, 4 did not produce a measurable peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) through the DISKHALER (3 with no adequate inhalation on request, 1 with missing data), 9 had measurable PIFR on each of 2 inhalations, and 3 achieved measurable PIFR on only 1 of 2 inhalations. Neither of two 6-year-olds and one of two 7-year-olds produced measurable PIFR. Overall, 8 of the 16 children (including all those younger than 8 years) either did not produce measurable inspiratory flow through the DISKHALER or produced peak inspiratory flow rates below the 60 L/minute considered optimal for the device under standardized in vitro testing; lack of measurable flow rate was related to low or undetectable serum concentrations [see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY and Clinical Studies]. Prescribers should carefully evaluate the ability of young children to use the delivery system if prescription of RELENZA is considered.
Prophylaxis Of Influenza
The safety and effectiveness of RELENZA for prophylaxis of influenza have been studied in 4 Phase 3 trials where 273 children aged 5 to 11 years and 239 adolescents aged 12 to 16 years received RELENZA. No differences in safety and effectiveness were observed between pediatric and adult subjects [see Clinical Studies].
Geriatric Use
Of the total number of subjects in 6 clinical trials of RELENZA for treatment of influenza, 59 subjects were aged 65 years and older, while 24 subjects were aged 75 years and older. Of the total number of subjects in 4 clinical trials of RELENZA for prophylaxis of influenza in households and community settings, 954 subjects were aged 65 years and older, while 347 subjects were aged 75 years and older. No overall differences in safety or effectiveness were observed between these subjects and younger subjects, and other reported clinical experience has not identified differences in responses between the elderly and younger subjects, but greater sensitivity of some older individuals cannot be ruled out. Elderly patients may need assistance with use of the device.
In 2 additional trials of RELENZA for prophylaxis of influenza in the nursing home setting, efficacy was not demonstrated [see INDICATIONS AND USAGE].
Renal Impairment
Safety and efficacy have not been documented in the presence of severe renal insufficiency. Due to the low systemic bioavailability of zanamivir following oral inhalation, no dosage adjustments are necessary in patients with renal impairment. However, the potential for drug accumulation should be considered.