SIDE EFFECTS
Thromboembolic adverse
reactions were reported in 6% of surgical patients treated with RECOTHROM in
all completed clinical trials (N=644) [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS].
Antibody formation to RECOTHROM
occurred in < 1% of patients. None of the antibodies detected neutralized
native human thrombin [see Immunogenicity].
Clinical Trials Experience
Because clinical trials are
conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in
the clinical trials of a drug product cannot be directly compared to rates in
the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in
clinical practice.
Clinical trials have been
performed with RECOTHROM applied with absorbable gelatin sponge and applied
with a spray applicator. A total of 644 patients were exposed to RECOTHROM in
these studies.
RECOTHROM Used In Conjunction With
Absorbable Gelatin Sponge
Four hundred eleven (411)
patients were treated in a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial that
compared RECOTHROM to bovine thrombin. Both thrombins were applied with a
gelatin sponge in patients undergoing spinal surgery, hepatic resection, peripheral
arterial bypass surgery, or arteriovenous graft formation for hemodialysis
access.1 The incidence of thromboembolic adverse reactions was
similar between the RECOTHROM and bovine thrombin treatment groups (see Table
1).
Table 1: Incidence of
Adverse Reactions with RECOTHROM and Bovine Thrombin
Adverse Reaction Category |
RECOTHROM
(N=205) n (%) |
Bovine Thrombin*
(N=206) n (%) |
Thromboembolic events |
11 (5%) |
12 (6%) |
* THROMBIN-JMI®
Thrombin, Topical(Bovine) |
In an open-label, single-group trial (N=209), patients
with documented or highly likely prior exposure to bovine thrombin within the
previous three years were treated with RECOTHROM when undergoing surgeries
(spinal, peripheral arterial bypass, or arteriovenous graft formation for
hemodialysis access).2 The incidence of thromboembolic adverse
reactions in this study was 9%.
In an open-label, single-group trial of re-exposure to
RECOTHROM (N=31), patients with documented prior exposure to RECOTHROM were
treated with RECOTHROM during surgery (spinal, peripheral arterial bypass, arteriovenous
graft formation, or other procedures).3 The incidence of
thromboembolic adverse reactions in this study was 3%.
In other randomized, double-blind trials across a range
of surgical settings (N=130; spinal surgery, hepatic resection, peripheral
arterial bypass surgery, or arteriovenous graft formation for hemodialysis
access), the safety of RECOTHROM (n=88 patients) was compared to placebo
(RECOTHROM excipients reconstituted with sterile 0.9% sodium chloride, USP)
(n=42 patients). The incidence of thromboembolic adverse reactions in this
study was 5% for RECOTHROM and 12% for placebo.
RECOTHROM Applied With Spray Applicator
RECOTHROM was applied with a spray applicator in two
open-label clinical trials: a single- group trial in adult and pediatric burn
patients (N=72; ≤ 16 years of age, (n=4) and ≥17 years of age,
(n=68)) treated with RECOTHROM applied to the wound excision site prior to
autologous skin grafting4; and in a single-group trial in pediatric
patients (one month to 17 years of age) undergoing synchronous burn wound
excision and autologous skin grafting (N=30; ≤ 16 years of age, (n=26);
≥17 years of age, (n=4)).5 In the first study, the incidence
of thromboembolic adverse reactions was 1%. In the second study, there were no
reported thromboembolic adverse reactions [see Use In Specific Populations].
Immunogenicity
The detection of antibody formation is highly dependent
upon the sensitivity and specificity of the assay. The absolute immunogenicity
rates reported here are difficult to compare with the results from other
products due to differences in assay methodology, patient populations, and
other underlying factors.
The potential for development of antibodies to RECOTHROM
was evaluated in multiple clinical trials and included patients with a single
exposure to RECOTHROM as well as patients who were re-exposed to RECOTHROM
during a subsequent surgical procedure. Only patients with both baseline and
post-treatment antibody specimens available were evaluated for the development
of specific anti-RECOTHROM product antibodies, which was defined as
seroconversion or a ≥1.0 titer unit (≥10-fold) increase in antibody
levels after study treatment. Five of 609 (0.8%; 95% CI, 0.4%-2.8%) evaluable
patients developed specific anti- RECOTHROM product antibodies. None of these
antibodies were found to neutralize native human thrombin. There was no
difference in anti-RECOTHROM product antibody formation incidence among
patients exposed to RECOTHROM applied with absorbable gelatin sponge, USP or
with spray applicator.
In a clinical trial comparing RECOTHROM to bovine
thrombin (N=411; n=398 antibody evaluable) for the development of specific
anti-product antibodies, blood samples were collected at baseline and at Day 29
in both treatment groups and were analyzed by ELISA.1 At baseline, 1.5%
of RECOTHROM patients (n=3/198) had positive anti-product antibody titers
compared with 5% of bovine thrombin patients (n=10/200). Of these patients,
none of the RECOTHROM group and eight in the bovine thrombin group exhibited
≥1.0 titer unit (≥10-fold) increases in anti-product antibody
levels after study treatment.
At Day 29, three of 198 (1.5%; 95% CI, 0%-4%) patients in
the RECOTHROM group developed specific anti-product antibodies (one patient
also developed anti-CHO host cell protein antibodies); 43 of 200 patients in
the bovine thrombin group (22%; 95% CI, 16%-28%) developed specific antibodies
to bovine thrombin product. Treatment with RECOTHROM resulted in a
statistically significant lower incidence of specific anti-product antibody
development. Because the study was not powered to detect a difference in clinical
outcomes attributable to antibody formation, no conclusions can be drawn
regarding the clinical significance of the difference in antibody formation
based on the results of this study. None of the antibodies in the RECOTHROM
group neutralized native human thrombin. Antibodies against bovine thrombin
product were not tested for neutralization of native human thrombin.
In a trial of patients with a high likelihood of prior
exposure to bovine thrombin, 15.6% of patients (n=32/205) had anti-bovine
thrombin product antibodies and 2% of patients (n=4/200) had anti-RECOTHROM
product antibodies at baseline.2 Following treatment, none of the
200 evaluable patients (patients for whom post-treatment specimens were
available) developed antibodies to RECOTHROM.
In a trial of patients previously exposed to RECOTHROM,
31 patients were re-exposed to RECOTHROM during a subsequent surgery.3
None of the evaluable patients (n=30) had anti- RECOTHROM product antibodies at
baseline and none developed antibodies at Day 29.
In a trial of RECOTHROM, including 26 pediatric patients
(aged one month to 16 years) and four patients 17 years of age, one patient
without prior thrombin exposure had pre-existing anti- RECOTHROM product
antibodies at baseline.5 None of the 27 evaluable patients developed anti-RECOTHROM product antibodies at Day 29.