CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism Of Action
Although the etiology of cognitive impairment in
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is not fully understood, it has been reported that
acetylcholine-producing neurons degenerate in the brains of patients with
Alzheimer's disease. The degree of this cholinergic loss has been correlated
with degree of cognitive impairment and density of amyloid plaques (a
neuropathological hallmark of Alzheimer's disease).
Galantamine, a tertiary alkaloid, is a competitive and
reversible inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase. While the precise mechanism of
galantamine's action is unknown, it is postulated to exert its therapeutic
effect by enhancing cholinergic function. This is accomplished by increasing
the concentration of acetylcholine through reversible inhibition of its
hydrolysis by cholinesterase. If this mechanism is correct, galantamine's
effect may lessen as the disease process advances and fewer cholinergic neurons
remain functionally intact. There is no evidence that galantamine alters the
course of the underlying dementing process.
Pharmacokinetics
The pharmacokinetics of galantamine are linear over a
dose range of 8-32 mg/day.
Absorption And Distribution
Galantamine is absorbed with time to peak concentration
of about 1 hour. The absolute bioavailability of galantamine is about 90%. The
bioavailability of the tablet formulation was the same as the bioavailability
of the oral solution formulation. Food did not affect the AUC of
galantamine, but Cmax was decreased by 25% and Tmax was
delayed by 1.5 hours, when galantamine was administered with food. The mean
volume of distribution of galantamine is 175 L.
The plasma protein binding of galantamine is 18% at
therapeutically relevant concentrations. In whole blood, galantamine is mainly
distributed to blood cells (52.7%). The blood to plasma concentration ratio of
galantamine is 1.2.
Metabolism And Elimination
Galantamine is metabolized by hepatic cytochrome P450
enzymes, glucuronidated, and excreted unchanged in the urine. In vitro studies
indicate that cytochrome CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 were the major cytochrome P450
isoenzymes involved in the metabolism of galantamine, and inhibitors of both
pathways increase oral bioavailability of galantamine modestly.
O-demethylation, mediated by CYP2D6 was greater in extensive metabolizers of
CYP2D6 than in poor metabolizers. In plasma from both poor and extensive
metabolizers, however, unchanged galantamine and its glucuronide accounted for
most of the sample radioactivity.
In studies of oral 3H-galantamine, unchanged galantamine
and its glucuronide, accounted for most plasma radioactivity in poor and
extensive CYP2D6 metabolizers. Up to 8 hours post-dose, unchanged galantamine
accounted for 39-77% of the total radioactivity in the plasma, and galantamine
glucuronide for 14-24%. By 7 days, 93-99% of the radioactivity had been
recovered, with about 95% in urine and about 5% in the feces. Total urinary
recovery of unchanged galantamine accounted for, on average, 32% of the dose
and that of galantamine glucuronide for another 12% on average.
After i.v. or oral administration, about 20% of the dose
was excreted as unchanged galantamine in the urine in 24 hours, representing a
renal clearance of about 65 mL/min, about 20-25% of the total plasma clearance
of about 300 mL/min. Galantamine has a terminal half-life of about 7 hours.
RAZADYNE® ER 24 mg extended-release capsules administered
once daily under fasting conditions are bioequivalent to RAZADYNE® tablets 12
mg twice daily with respect to AUC24h and Cmin. The Cmax and Tmax of the
extended-release capsules were lower and occurred later, respectively, compared
with the immediate-release tablets, with Cmax about 25% lower and median Tmax occurring
about 4.5-5.0 hours after dosing. Dose-proportionality is observed for RAZADYNE®
ER extended-release capsules over the dose range of 8 to 24 mg daily and steady
state is achieved within a week. There was no effect of age on the
pharmacokinetics of RAZADYNE® ER extended-release capsules. CYP2D6 poor
metabolizers had drug exposures that were approximately 50% higher than for
extensive metabolizers.
There are no appreciable differences in pharmacokinetic
parameters when RAZADYNE® ER extended-release capsules are given with food
compared to when they are given in the fasted state.
Specific Populations
Elderly
Data from clinical trials in patients with Alzheimer's
disease indicate that galantamine concentrations are 30-40% higher in those
patients than in healthy young subjects.
Gender and Race
A population pharmacokinetic analysis (on 539 men and 550
women) indicates that galantamine clearance is about 20% lower in women than in
men (which is explained by a lower body weight in women) and that race (n=1029
White, 24 Black, 13 Asian and 23 other) did not affect the clearance of
galantamine.
Hepatic Impairment
Following a single 4 mg dose of galantamine tablets, the
pharmacokinetics of galantamine in subjects with mild hepatic impairment (n=8;
Child-Pugh score of 5-6) were similar to the pharmacokinetics of galantamine in
healthy subjects. In patients with moderate hepatic impairment (n=8; Child Pugh
score of 7-9), galantamine clearance was decreased by about 25% compared to
galantamine clearance in normal volunteers. Exposure to galantamine would be
expected to increase further with increasing degree of hepatic impairment [see DOSAGE
AND ADMINISTRATION and Use in Specific Populations].
Renal Impairment
Following a single 8 mg dose of galantamine tablets, AUC
increased by 37% and 67% in patients with moderate and severe renal impairment,
respectively, compared with normal volunteers [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION
and Use in Specific Populations].
CYP2D6 Poor Metabolizers
Approximately 7% of the normal population has a genetic
variation that leads to reduced levels of activity of CYP2D6 isozyme. Such
individuals have been referred to as poor metabolizers. After a single oral
dose of 4 mg or 8 mg galantamine, CYP2D6 poor metabolizers demonstrated a
similar Cmax and about 35% AUC∞ increase of unchanged galantamine
compared to extensive metabolizers.
A total of 356 patients with Alzheimer's disease enrolled
in two Phase 3 studies were genotyped with respect to CYP2D6 (n=210
hetero-extensive metabolizers, 126 homo-extensive metabolizers, and 20 poor
metabolizers). Population pharmacokinetic analysis indicated that there was a
25% decrease in median clearance in poor metabolizers compared to extensive
metabolizers. Dosage adjustment is not necessary in patients identified as poor
metabolizers as the dose of drug is individually titrated to tolerability.
Drug-Drug Interactions
Multiple metabolic pathways and renal excretion are
involved in the elimination of galantamine so no single pathway appears
predominant. Based on in vitro studies, CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 were the major
enzymes involved in the metabolism of galantamine. CYP2D6 was involved in the
formation of O-desmethyl-galantamine, whereas CYP3A4 mediated the formation of
galantamine-N-oxide. Galantamine is also glucuronidated and excreted unchanged
in urine.
Effect of Other Drugs on Galantamine
CYP3A4 Inhibitors
Ketoconazole
Ketoconazole, a strong inhibitor of CYP3A4 and an
inhibitor of CYP2D6, when administered at a dose of 200 mg two times a day for
4 days, increased the AUC of galantamine by 30%.
Erythromycin
Erythromycin, a moderate inhibitor of CYP3A4, when
administered at a dose of 500 mg four times a day for 4 days, affected the AUC
of galantamine minimally (10% increase).
CYP2D6 Inhibitors: A population pharmacokinetics
analysis on a database of 852 patients with Alzheimer's disease showed that the
clearance of galantamine was reduced about 25-33% by the concurrent
administration of amitriptyline (n=17), fluoxetine (n=48), fluvoxamine (n=14),
and quinidine (n=7), all of which are known inhibitors of CYP2D6.
Paroxetine
Paroxetine, a strong inhibitor of CYP2D6, when
administered at a dose of 20 mg/day for 16 days, increased the oral
bioavailability of galantamine by about 40%.
H2 Antagonists
Galantamine was administered as a single dose of 4 mg on Day 2 of a 3-day
treatment with either cimetidine (800 mg daily) or ranitidine (300 mg daily).
Cimetidine increased the bioavailability of galantamine by approximately 16%.
Ranitidine had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of galantamine.
Memantine
Memantine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, when administered at a
dose of 10 mg two times a day, had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of
galantamine (16 mg/day) at steady state.
Effect of Galantamine on Other Drugs
In Vitro Studies
In vitro studies show that galantamine did not inhibit the metabolic pathways
catalyzed by CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP3A4, CYP4A, CYP2C, CYP2D6 or CYP2E1. This
indicates that the inhibitory potential of galantamine towards the major forms
of cytochrome P450 is very low.
In Vivo Studies
Warfarin
Multiple doses of galantamine at 24 mg/day had no effect
on the pharmacokinetics of R-and S-warfarin (administered in a single dose of
25 mg) or on the increased prothrombin time induced by warfarin. The protein
binding of warfarin was unaffected by galantamine.
Digoxin
Multiple doses of galantamine at 24 mg/day had no effect
on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of digoxin (at a dose of 0.375 mg once
daily) when those two drugs were co-administered. In that study, however, one
healthy subject was hospitalized on account of 2nd and 3rd degree heart block
and bradycardia.
Clinical Studies
The effectiveness of galantamine as a treatment for
Alzheimer's disease is demonstrated by the results of 5 randomized,
double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical investigations in patients with
probable Alzheimer's disease, 4 with the immediate-release tablet and 1 with
the extended-release capsule [diagnosed by NINCDS-ADRDA criteria, with
Mini-Mental State Examination scores that were ≥ 10 and ≤ 24]. Doses
studied with the tablet formulation were 8-32 mg/day given as twice daily
doses. In 3 of the 4 studies with the tablet, patients were started on a low
dose of 8 mg, then titrated weekly by 8 mg/day to 24 or 32 mg as assigned. In
the fourth study (USA 4-week Dose Escalation Fixed-Dose Study) dose escalation
of 8 mg/day occurred over 4-week intervals. The mean age of patients
participating in these 4 galantamine trials was 75 years with a range of 41 to
100. Approximately 62% of patients were women and 38% were men. The racial
distribution was White 94%, Black 3% and other races 3%. Two other studies
examined a three times daily dosing regimen; these also showed or suggested
benefit but did not suggest an advantage over twice daily dosing.
Study Outcome Measures
In each study, the primary effectiveness of galantamine
was evaluated using a dual outcome assessment strategy as measured by the
Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-cog) and the Clinician's Interview
Based Impression of Change that required the use of caregiver information
(CIBIC-plus).
The ability of galantamine to improve cognitive performance
was assessed with the cognitive sub-scale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment
Scale (ADAS-cog), a multi-item instrument that has been extensively validated
in longitudinal cohorts of Alzheimer's disease patients. The ADAS-cog examines
selected aspects of cognitive performance including elements of memory,
orientation, attention, reasoning, language and praxis. The ADAS-cog scoring
range is from 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating greater cognitive
impairment. Elderly normal adults may score as low as 0 or 1, but it is not
unusual for non-demented adults to score slightly higher.
The patients recruited as participants in each study
using the tablet formulation had mean scores on ADAS-cog of approximately 27
units, with a range from 5 to 69. Experience gained in longitudinal studies of
ambulatory patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease suggests that
they gain 6 to 12 units a year on the ADAS-cog. Lesser degrees of change,
however, are seen in patients with very mild or very advanced disease because
the ADAS-cog is not uniformly sensitive to change over the course of the
disease. The annualized rate of decline in the placebo patients participating
in galantamine trials was approximately 4.5 units per year.
The ability of galantamine to produce an overall clinical
effect was assessed using a Clinician's Interview Based Impression of Change
that required the use of caregiver information, the CIBIC-plus. The CIBIC-plus
is not a single instrument and is not a standardized instrument like the
ADAS-cog. Clinical trials for investigational drugs have used a variety of
CIBIC formats, each different in terms of depth and structure. As such, results
from a CIBIC-plus reflect clinical experience from the trial or trials in which
it was used and cannot be compared directly with the results of CIBIC-plus
evaluations from other clinical trials. The CIBIC-plus used in the trials was a
semi-structured instrument based on a comprehensive evaluation at baseline and
subsequent time-points of 4 major areas of patient function: general,
cognitive, behavioral and activities of daily living. It represents the
assessment of a skilled clinician based on his/her observation at an interview
with the patient, in combination with information supplied by a caregiver
familiar with the behavior of the patient over the interval rated. The
CIBIC-plus is scored as a seven point categorical rating, ranging from a score
of 1, indicating “markedly improved,” to a score of 4, indicating “no change”
to a score of 7, indicating “marked worsening.” The CIBIC-plus has not been
systematically compared directly to assessments not using information from
caregivers (CIBIC) or other global methods.
Immediate-Release Tablets
U.S. Twenty-One Week Fixed-Dose Study
In a study of 21 weeks duration, 978 patients were
randomized to doses of 8, 16, or 24 mg of galantamine per day, or to placebo,
each given in 2 divided doses. Treatment was initiated at 8 mg/day for all
patients randomized to galantamine, and increased by 8 mg/day every 4 weeks.
Therefore, the maximum titration phase was 8 weeks and
the minimum maintenance phase was 13 weeks (in patients randomized to 24 mg/day
of galantamine).
Effects on the ADAS-cog
Figure 1 illustrates the time course for the change from
baseline in ADAS-cog scores for all four dose groups over the 21 weeks of the
study. At 21 weeks of treatment, the mean differences in the ADAS-cog change
scores for the galantamine-treated patients compared to the patients on placebo
were 1.7, 3.3, and 3.6 units for the 8, 16 and 24 mg/day treatments,
respectively. The 16 mg/day and 24 mg/day treatments were statistically
significantly superior to placebo and to the 8 mg/day treatment. There was no statistically
significant difference between the 16 mg/day and 24 mg/day dose groups.
Figure 1: Time-Course of the Change From Baseline in
ADAS-cog Score for Patients Completing 21 Weeks (5 Months) of Treatment
Figure 2 illustrates the
cumulative percentages of patients from each of the four treatment groups who
had attained at least the measure of improvement in ADAS-cog score shown on the
X-axis. Three change scores (10-point, 7-point and 4-point reductions) and no
change in score from baseline have been identified for illustrative purposes,
and the percent of patients in each group achieving that result is shown in the
inset table.
The curves demonstrate that
both patients assigned to galantamine and placebo have a wide range of
responses, but that the galantamine groups are more likely to show the greater
improvements.
Figure 2: Cumulative Percentage of Patients Completing
21 Weeks of Double-Blind Treatment With Specified Changes From Baseline in
ADAS-cog Scores. The Percentages of Randomized Patients Who Completed the Study
Were: Placebo 84%, 8 mg/day 77%, 16 mg/day 78% and 24 mg/day 78%.
Treatment |
Change in ADAS-cog |
-10 |
-7 |
-4 |
-0 |
Placebo |
3.6% |
7.6% |
19.6 % |
41.8% |
8 mg/day |
5.9% |
13.9% |
25.7% |
46.5% |
16 mg/day |
7.2% |
15.9% |
35.6% |
65.4% |
24 mg/day |
10.4% |
22.3% |
37.0% |
64.9% |
Effects on the CIBIC-plus
Figure 3 is a histogram of the
percentage distribution of CIBIC-plus scores attained by patients assigned to
each of the four treatment groups who completed 21 weeks of treatment. The
galantamine-placebo differences for these groups of patients in mean rating
were 0.15, 0.41 and 0.44 units for the 8, 16 and 24 mg/day treatments,
respectively. The 16 mg/day and 24 mg/day treatments were statistically
significantly superior to placebo. The differences vs. the 8 mg/day treatment
for the 16 and 24 mg/day treatments were 0.26 and 0.29, respectively. There
were no statistically significant differences between the 16 mg/day and 24
mg/day dose groups.
Figure 3: Distribution of CIBIC-plus Ratings at Week 21
U.S. Twenty-Six Week Fixed-Dose Study
In a study of 26 weeks duration, 636 patients were randomized to either a dose of 24 mg or 32 mg of
galantamine per day, or to placebo, each given in two divided doses. The
26-week study was divided into a 3-week dose titration phase and a 23-week
maintenance phase.
Effects on the ADAS-cog
Figure 4 illustrates the time
course for the change from baseline in ADAS-cog scores for all three dose
groups over the 26 weeks of the study. At 26 weeks of treatment, the mean
differences in the ADAS-cog change scores for the galantamine-treated patients
compared to the patients on placebo were 3.9 and 3.8 units for the 24 mg/day
and 32 mg/day treatments, respectively. Both treatments were statistically
significantly superior to placebo, but were not significantly different from
each other.
Figure 4: Time-Course of the
Change From Baseline in ADAS-cog Score for Patients Completing 26 Weeks of
Treatment
Figure 5 illustrates the cumulative percentages of patients from each of the three treatment groups who
had attained at least the measure of improvement in ADAS-cog score shown on the
X-axis. Three change scores (10-point, 7-point and 4-point reductions) and no
change in score from baseline have been identified for illustrative purposes,
and the percent of patients in each group achieving that result is shown in the
inset table.
The curves demonstrate that both patients assigned to galantamine and placebo have a wide range of
responses, but that the galantamine groups are more likely to show the greater
improvements. A curve for an effective treatment would be shifted to the left
of the curve for placebo, while an ineffective or deleterious treatment would
be superimposed upon, or shifted to the right of the curve for placebo,
respectively.
Treatment |
Change in ADAS-cog |
-10 |
-7 |
-4 |
-0 |
Placebo |
2.1% |
5.7% |
16.6 % |
43.9% |
24 mg/day |
7.6% |
18.3% |
33.6% |
64.1% |
32 mg/day |
11.1% |
19.7% |
33.3% |
58.1% |
Figure 5: Cumulative
Percentage of Patients Completing 26 Weeks of Double-Blind Treatment With
Specified Changes From Baseline in ADAS-cog Scores. The Percentages of
Randomized Patients Who Completed the Study Were: Placebo 81%, 24 mg/day 68%,
and 32 mg/day 58%.
Effects on the CIBIC-plus
Figure 6 is a histogram of the percentage distribution of CIBIC-plus scores attained by patients assigned to
each of the three treatment groups who completed 26 weeks of treatment. The
mean galantamine-placebo differences for these groups of patients in the mean
rating were 0.28 and 0.29 units for 24 and 32 mg/day of galantamine,
respectively. The mean ratings for both groups were statistically significantly
superior to placebo, but were not significantly different from each other.
Figure 6: Distribution of CIBIC-plus Ratings at Week 26
International Twenty-Six Week Fixed-Dose
Study In a study of 26 weeks duration identical in design to the USA 26-Week Fixed-Dose Study, 653 patients
were randomized to either a dose of 24 mg or 32 mg of galantamine per day, or
to placebo, each given in two divided doses. The 26-week study was divided into
a 3-week dose titration phase and a 23-week maintenance phase.
Effects on the ADAS-cog
Figure 7 illustrates the time course for the change from baseline in ADAS-cog scores for all three dose
groups over the 26 weeks of the study. At 26 weeks of treatment, the mean
differences in the ADAS-cog change scores for the galantamine-treated patients
compared to the patients on placebo were 3.1 and 4.1 units for the 24 mg/day
and 32 mg/day treatments, respectively. Both treatments were statistically
significantly superior to placebo, but were not significantly different from
each other.
Figure 7: Time-Course of the Change From Baseline in
ADAS-cog Score for Patients Completing 26 Weeks of Treatment
Figure 8 illustrates the
cumulative percentages of patients from each of the three treatment groups who
had attained at least the measure of improvement in ADAS-cog score shown on the
X-axis. Three change scores (10-point, 7-point and 4-point reductions) and no
change in score from baseline have been identified for illustrative purposes,
and the percent of patients in each group achieving that result is shown in the
inset table.
The curves demonstrate that
both patients assigned to galantamine and placebo have a wide range of
responses, but that the galantamine groups are more likely to show the greater
improvements.
Figure 8: Cumulative
Percentage of Patients Completing 26 Weeks of Double-Blind Treatment With Specified
Changes From Baseline in ADAS-cog Scores. The Percentages of Randomized
Patients Who Completed the Study Were: Placebo 87%, 24 mg/day 80%, and 32
mg/day 75%.
Treatment |
Change in ADAS-cog |
-10 |
-7 |
-4 |
-0 |
Placebo |
1.2% |
5.8% |
15.2% |
39.8% |
24 mg/day |
4.5% |
15.4% |
30.8% |
65.4% |
32 mg/day |
7.9% |
19.7% |
34.9% |
63.8% |
Effects on the CIBIC-plus
Figure 9 is a histogram of the
percentage distribution of CIBIC-plus scores attained by patients assigned to
each of the three treatment groups who completed 26 weeks of treatment. The
mean galantamine-placebo differences for these groups of patients in the mean
rating of change from baseline were 0.34 and 0.47 for 24 and 32 mg/day of
galantamine respectively. The mean ratings for the galantamine groups were
statistically significantly superior to placebo, but were not significantly
different from each other.
Figure 9: Distribution of CIBIC-plus Rating at Week 26
International Thirteen-Week
Flexible-Dose Study
In a study of 13 weeks
duration, 386 patients were randomized to either a flexible dose of 24-32
mg/day of galantamine or to placebo, each given in two divided doses. The
13-week study was divided into a 3-week dose titration phase and a 10-week maintenance
phase. The patients in the active treatment arm of the study were maintained at
either 24 mg/day or 32 mg/day at the discretion of the investigator.
Effects on the ADAS-cog
Figure 10 illustrates the time
course for the change from baseline in ADAS-cog scores for both dose groups
over the 13 weeks of the study. At 13 weeks of treatment, the mean difference
in the ADAS-cog change scores for the treated patients compared to the patients
on placebo was 1.9. Galantamine at a dose of 24-32 mg/day was statistically
significantly superior to placebo.
Figure 10: Time-Course of the Change From Baseline in
ADAS-cog Score for Patients Completing 13 Weeks of Treatment
Figure 11 illustrates the
cumulative percentages of patients from each of the two treatment groups who
had attained at least the measure of improvement in ADAS-cog score shown on the
X-axis. Three change scores (10-point, 7-point and 4-point reductions) and no
change in score from baseline have been identified for illustrative purposes,
and the percent of patients in each group achieving that result is shown in the
inset table.
The curves demonstrate that
both patients assigned to galantamine and placebo have a wide range of
responses, but that the galantamine group is more likely to show the greater
improvement.
Figure 11: Cumulative
Percentage of Patients Completing 13 Weeks of Double-Blind Treatment With Specified
Changes from Baseline in ADAS-cog Scores. The Percentages of Randomized
Patients Who Completed the Study Were: Placebo 90%, 24-32 mg/day 67%.
Treatment |
Change in ADAS-cog |
-10 |
-7 |
-4 |
-0 |
Placebo |
1.9% |
5.6% |
19.4% |
50.0% |
24 or 32 mg/day |
7.1% |
18.8% |
32.9% |
65.3% |
Effects on the CIBIC-plus
Figure 12 is a histogram of the
percentage distribution of CIBIC-plus scores attained by patients assigned to
each of the two treatment groups who completed 13 weeks of treatment. The mean
galantamine-placebo differences for the group of patients in the mean rating of
change from baseline were 0.37 units. The mean rating for the 24-32 mg/day
group was statistically significantly superior to placebo.
Figure 12: Distribution of
CIBIC-plus Ratings at Week 13
Age, Gender And Race
Patient's age, gender, or race
did not predict clinical outcome of treatment.
Extended-Release Capsules
The efficacy of galantamine
extended-release capsules was studied in a randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled trial which was 6 months in duration, and had an initial
4-week dose-escalation phase. In this trial, patients were assigned to one of 3
treatment groups: Galantamine extended-release capsules in a flexible dose of
16 to 24 mg once daily; galantamine tablets in a flexible dose of 8 to 12 mg
twice daily; and placebo. The primary efficacy measures in this study were the
ADAS-cog and CIBIC-plus. On the protocol-specified primary efficacy analysis at
Month 6, a statistically significant improvement favoring galantamine
extended-release capsules over placebo was seen for the ADAS-cog, but not for
the CIBIC-plus. Galantamine extended-release capsules showed a statistically
significant improvement when compared with placebo on the Alzheimer's Disease
Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) scale, a measure of
function, and a secondary efficacy measure in this study. The effects of
both galantamine extended-release capsules and galantamine tablets on the
ADAS-cog, CIBIC-plus, and ADCS-ADL were similar in this study.