CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
QUADRAMET® (samarium sm 153 lexidronam) (samarium Sm-153 EDTMP) has an affinity for bone and concentrates
in areas of bone turnover in association with hydroxyapatite. In clinical studies
employing planar imaging techniques, more QUADRAMET® (samarium sm 153 lexidronam) accumulates in osteoblastic
lesions than in normal bone with a lesion-to-normal bone ratio of approximately
5. The mechanism of action of QUADRAMET® (samarium sm 153 lexidronam) in relieving the pain of bone metastases
is not known.
Distribution: Human protein binding has not been studied; however, in
dog, rat and bovine studies, less than 0.5% of samarium-153 EDTMP is bound to
protein. At physiologic pH, >90% of the complex is present as 153Sm[EDTMP]-5,
and <10% as 153SmH[EDTMP]-4. The octanol/ water partition coefficient
is <10-5.
Skeletal Uptake: The greater the number of metastatic lesions, the more
skeletal uptake of Sm-153 radioactivity. The relationship between skeletal uptake
and the size of the metastatic lesions has not been studied. The total skeletal
uptake of radioactivity was 65.5% ± 15.5% of the injected dose in 453 patients
with metastatic lesions from a variety o primary malignancies. In a study of
22 patients with a wide range in the number of metastatic sites, the % of the
injected dose (% ID) taken up by bone ranged from 56.3% in a patient with 5
metastatic lesions to 76.7% in a patient with 52 metastatic lesions. If the
number of metastatic lesions is fixed, over the range 0.1 to 3.0 mCi/kg, the
% ID taken up by bone is the same regardless of the dose.
Metabolism: The complex formed by samarium and EDTMP is excreted as
an intact, single species that consists of one atom of the Sm-153 and one molecule
of the EDTMP, as shown by an analysis of urine samples from patients (n=5) administered
samarium Sm-153 EDTMP. Metabolic products of samarium Sm-153 EDTMP were not
detected in humans.
Elimination: For QUADRAMET® (samarium sm 153 lexidronam) , calculations of the % ID detected in
the whole body, urine and blood were corrected for radionuclide decay. The clearance
of activity through the urine is expressed as the cumulated activity excreted.
The whole body retention is the simple reciprocal of the cumulated urine activity.
(See Skeletal Uptake Section)
Blood: Clearance of radioactivity from the blood demonstrated biexponential
kinetics after intravenous injection in 19 patients (10 men, 9 women) with a
variety of primary cancers that were metastatic to bone Over the first 30 minutes,
the radioactivity (mean ± SD) in the blood decreased to 15% (±8%) of the injected
dose with a t 1/2 of 5.5 min (±1.1 min). After 30 minutes, the radioactivity
cleared from the blood more slowly with a t1/2 of 65.4 min (± 9.6 min). Less
than 1% of the dose injected remained in the blood 5 hr after injection.
Urine: Samarium Sm-153 EDTMP radioactivity was excreted in the urine
after intravenous injection. During the first 6 hours, 34.5% (±15.5%) was excreted.
Overall, the greater the number of metastatic lesions, the less radioactivity
was excreted.
Gender Differences: Gender did not affect the samarium Sm-153 EDTMP
blood pharmacokinetics, the cumulative % of radioactivity excreted in urine,
or the % radioactivity retained in the skeleton when the number of metastatic
lesions is taken into account.
Special Populations
Elderly: The pharmacokinetics of samarium Sm-153 EDTMP did not
change with age as seen from comparison of values from people in the age range
of 22 to 64 compared to the range 65 to 86 years.
Hepatic Insufficiency: Samarium Sm-153 EDTMP scintiscans in 5
patients with metastatic bone disease did not reveal accumulation of activity
in the liver or the intestine; this suggests that hepatobiliary excretion did
not occur.
Renal Insufficiency: Patients with renal insufficiency have not
been studied.
Drug/Drug Interaction
Drug-drug interaction studies have not been studied.
Pharmacodynamics
The beta particle of 153Sm-EDTMP travels an average of 3.1 mm in
soft tissue and 1.7 mm in bone. In clinical trials of 78 patients with metastatic
bone lesions who had 13 specific bone scan sites evaluated, the presence or
absence of 153Sm-EDTMP uptake is similar to the presence or absence of 99mTc
diphosphonate uptake (range 67 to 96% agreemen depending upon the blinded reader
and the site of the body). Whether the amount of 153Sm-EDTMP uptake
varies with the size of the lesion or to the presence of osteolytic components
has not been studied. The clinical benefit of Sm-153-EDTMP in patients with
osteolytic lesions is not known. The relationship of different tumor cell types
to clinical response has not been studied.
Clinical Trials
Overall QUADRAMET® was evaluated in 580 patients (see ADVERSE
EVENTS Section for demographic description). Of these patients, 270
(244 men, 26 women) were studied in two randomized, blinded, placebo controlled
clinical trials. These patients had a mean age of 67, and a range 22 to 87 years.
Eligible patients had painful metastatic bone lesions that had failed other
treatments, had at least a 6 month expected survival and had a positive radionuclide
bone scan. Routine x-rays to evaluate the metastatic lesions were not part of
the protocol.
In study A, 118 patients were randomized to receive 0.5 mCi/kg QUADRAMET® (samarium sm 153 lexidronam) ,
1.0 mCi/kg QUADRAMET® (samarium sm 153 lexidronam) , or a placebo intravenous injection. In study B, 152
patients were randomized to receive either 1.0 mCi/kg QUADRAMET® (samarium sm 153 lexidronam) or a placebo
intravenous injection. Both studies were double blind over a 4 week period.
Patients scored their daily pain intensity on a visual analogue scale rated
from 0 (no or low pain) to 10 (excruciating pain). The area under the pain curve
(AUPC) was obtained by integrating the daily pain scores by week. Opioid analgesic
use was recorded daily and averaged over each week and expressed in oral morphine
milligram equivalents.
Of the 270 patients studied, 232 (86%) had prostate cancer and 38 (14%) had
other primary cancers. In study A, 80 (68%) of the patients had prostate cancer
and 38 (32%) had a variety of other primary tumors In study B, all (100%) patients
had prostate cancer.
The results of the patients' AUPC scores are shown in Table 3. In both trials
for each of the 4 weeks of study, the mean AUPC scores decreased in patients
who received QUADRAMET® (samarium sm 153 lexidronam) (1.0 mCi/kg). In study A, pain (the AUPC) decrease
from baseline was significantly different in QUADRAMET® (samarium sm 153 lexidronam) 1.0 mCi/kg and placebo
groups at weeks 3 and 4. In study B, pain (the AUPC) decrease from baseline
was significantly different in QUADRAMET® (samarium sm 153 lexidronam) 1.0 mCi/kg and placebo groups
at weeks 2, 3 and 4.
Table 3: COMPARISON OF WEEKLY PAIN SCORES (a) AFTER QUADRAMET® (samarium sm 153 lexidronam)
1.0mCi/kg or PLACEBO IV [Intent to Treat]
|
STUDY A (n= 73) (b) |
STUDY B (n= 150) (c) |
WEEK |
Placebo
N=36 |
1.0 mCi/kg
N=37 |
Placebo
N=50 |
1.0 mCi/kg
N=100 |
Baseline |
26.5 (11.8) |
28.7 (12.3) |
28.5 (14.1) |
28.1 (12.9) |
1 |
26.1 (10.3) |
27.6 (14.1) |
27.9 (14.6) |
25.8 (13.1) |
2 |
24.4 (10.4) |
23.8 (13.7) |
28.1 (15.4) |
20.6 (13.9)* |
3 |
24.3 (11.0) |
20.5 (11.5)* |
25.8 (16.1) |
20.1 (13.3)* |
4 |
24.7 (12.1) |
18.8 (10.8)* |
24.7 (15.3) |
19.9 (13.7)* |
(a) Area Under the Pain Curve (SD).
(b) Excludes 5 patients with missing baseline or extreme values; and all
40 patients who received 0.5 mCi QUADRAMET® (samarium sm 153 lexidronam) . QUADRAMET® (samarium sm 153 lexidronam) 0.5 mCi/kg
can not be distinguished from placebo.
(c) Excludes 2 patients with missing baseline values.
(*) Statistically significant difference in change from baseline in comparison
to placebo. |
In the two clinical trials, the patient use of analgesics differed. In Study A, the patients did not receive specific instructions on analgesic reduction. In Study B, patients were encouraged to adjust their pain medication as needed. As shown in Table 4, the morphine equivalent analgesic use in study A generally increased from baseline in both the QUADRAMET® (samarium sm 153 lexidronam) and placebo treatment groups; however, the difference between the QUADRAMET® (samarium sm 153 lexidronam) and placebo group change from baseline i not statistically significant. In study B, the placebo treated patients increased their use of opioid analgesics, while the QUADRAMET® (samarium sm 153 lexidronam) treated patients decreased their use of opioid analgesics.
Table 4: COMPARISON OF WEEKLY MEAN ANALGESIC USE (a) BETWEEN
QUADRAMET® (samarium sm 153 lexidronam) 1.0 mCi/kg AND PLACEBO GROUPS [Intent to Treat]
|
STUDY A (n= 73) (b) |
STUDY B (n= 150) (c) |
WEEK |
Placebo
N=36 |
1.0 mCi/kg
N=37 |
Placebo
N=50 |
1.0 mCi/kg
N=100 |
Baseline |
93.5 (154.0)(a) |
127.1 (189.9) |
78.4 (83.1) |
96.5 (166.6) |
1 |
106.8 (173.8) |
125.7 (192.6) |
84.5 (91.1) |
93.5 (165.5) |
2 |
127.1 (238.4) |
144.8 (276.7) |
85.6 (90.9) |
82.9 (122.9) |
3 |
133.9 (254.0) |
146.6 (278.2) |
100.1 (119.4) |
79.6 (131.2)* |
4 |
135.6 (222.0) |
135.1 (274.0) |
106.3 (161.0) |
76.8 (132.3)* |
(a) Mean Analgesic Use (SD) is in morphine equivalent units;
0 = none.
(b) Excludes 5 patients with missing baseline or with extreme values; and
all 40 patients who received 0.5 mCi QUADRAMET® (samarium sm 153 lexidronam) . QUADRAMET® (samarium sm 153 lexidronam) 0.5
mCi/kg can not be distinguished from placebo.
(c) Excludes 2 patients with missing baseline values.
(*) Statistically significant difference in change from baseline in comparison
to placebo. |
In both studies, the numbers of patients who experienced any decrease in AUPC
score without any increase in analgesic use at weeks 3 and 4 were also evaluated.
In study A, this occurred in 20/37 (54%) of the patients who received QUADRAMET® (samarium sm 153 lexidronam)
1.0 mCi/kg and 9/36 (25%) of the placebo treated patients. In study B, this
occurred in 48/100 (48%) of the QUADRAMET (samarium sm 153 lexidronam) ® treated patients and 11/51 (22%)
of the placebo treated patients.