Clinical Pharmacology for Prevymis
Mechanism Of Action
PREVYMIS is an antiviral drug against CMV [see Microbiology].
Pharmacodynamics
Cardiac Electrophysiology
In a thorough QT trial in healthy adult subjects, letermovir at the therapeutic IV dose or at a dose of 2 times the approved IV dose did not prolong QTc to any clinically relevant extent.
Pharmacokinetics
The pharmacokinetic properties of letermovir are displayed in Table 12.
Table 12: Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Elimination (ADME), and Pharmacokinetic Properties of PREVYMIS*
| Pharmacokinetics in Adult HSCT Recipients |
| Treatment Regimen |
Steady-state median (90% prediction interval) AUC (ng•hr/mL) of PREVYMIS |
| 480 mg oral once daily, no cyclosporine |
34,400 (16,900, 73,700) |
| 480 mg IV once daily, no cyclosporine |
100,000 (65,300, 148,000) |
| 240 mg oral once daily, with cyclosporine |
60,800 (28,700, 122,000) |
| 240 mg IV once daily, with cyclosporine |
70,300 (46,200, 106,000) |
| Pharmacokinetics in Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients |
| Treatment Regimen |
Steady-state median (90% prediction interval) AUC (ng•hr/mL) of PREVYMIS |
| 480 mg oral once daily, no cyclosporine |
62,700 (17,500, 139,000) |
| 240 mg oral once daily, with cyclosporine |
71,900 (42,400, 125,000) |
| Pharmacokinetics in Adult Healthy Subjects |
| Treatment Regimen |
Steady-state geometric mean AUC and Cmax of PREVYMIS |
480 mg oral once daily |
Cmax: 13,000 ng/mL
AUC: 71,500 ng•hr/mL |
| Dose proportionality |
Greater than proportional following single and multiple oral or IV doses of PREVYMIS 240 mg and 480 mg |
| Accumulation ratio† |
Cmax: 1.03
AUC: 1.22 |
| Time to steady-state |
9-10 days |
| Absorption |
| Bioavailability |
Healthy adult subjects administered PREVYMIS without cyclosporine: 94% at an oral dose range
of 240 mg to 480 mg |
|
Adult HSCT recipients administered PREVYMIS without cyclosporine: 35% with 480 mg oral once
daily
Adult HSCT recipients administered PREVYMIS with cyclosporine: 85% with 240 mg oral once
daily
Adult kidney transplant recipients administered PREVYMIS without cyclosporine: 56%‡ with
480 mg oral once daily
|
| Median Tmax (hr) |
1.5 to 3.0 hr |
| Effect of food (relative to fasting)§ |
AUC: 99.63% [84.27% - 117.80%]
Cmax: 129.82% [104.35% -161.50%] |
| Oral pellets versus tablet (fasting) |
AUC and Cmax values were comparable when comparing PREVYMIS tablet (240 mg) and
PREVYMIS oral pellets (2 X 120 mg) |
| Distribution |
| Mean steady-state volume of distribution |
45.5 L following IV administration in adult HSCT recipients |
| % In vitro bound to human plasma proteins |
99% across the concentration range of 0.2 to 50
mg/L |
| In vitro blood-to plasma ratio |
0.56 across the concentration range of 0.1 to 10 mg/L |
| Metabolism |
| In vitro metabolism |
UGT1A1/1A3 (minor) |
| Drug-related component in plasma |
97% unchanged parent
No major metabolites detected in plasma |
| Elimination |
| Route of elimination |
Hepatic uptake (OATP1B1/3) |
| Mean terminal t1/2 (hr) |
12 hrs after dosing of PREVYMIS 480 mg IV once daily |
| % of dose excreted in feces¶ |
93% |
| % of dose excreted in urine¶ |
<2% |
| % of unchanged drug excreted in feces¶ |
70% |
* Values were obtained in studies of healthy adult subjects unless otherwise indicated.
† Based on geometric mean data.
‡ 95% CI (46%, 65%)
§ Values refer to geometric mean ratio [fed/fasted] percentage and 90% confidence interval back transformed from linear mixed-effects model performed on natural log-transformed values. The meal administered was a standard high fat and high calorie meal (33 grams protein, 65 grams
carbohydrates, 58 grams fat; 920 total calories).
¶ Single oral administration of radiolabeled letermovir in mass balance study. |
Specific Populations
Pediatric Patients
Letermovir AUC in pediatric HSCT recipients was estimated using population pharmacokinetic analysis using Trial P030 data (see Table 13 and Table 14). Exposures for pediatric HSCT recipients for body weight bands 6 kg and above are within the range of exposures observed at the recommended doses of PREVYMIS in adults (see Table 12).
Table 13: PREVYMIS AUC (ng•hr/mL) Values Following Once Daily Oral Administration in Pediatric HSCT Recipients
| Body Weight |
Oral Dose, No Cyclosporine |
Steady-state Median (90% Prediction Interval)* |
Oral Dose, With Cyclosporine |
Steady-state Median20 (90% Prediction Interval)* |
| 30 kg and above† |
480 mg |
38,500
(18,100, 78,100) |
240 mg |
(24,100, 102,000) 50,200 |
| 15 kg to less than 30 kg |
240 mg |
39,600
(21,300, 71,800) |
120 mg |
(27,800, 102,000) 53,200 |
| 7.5 kg to less than 15 kg |
120 mg |
32,900
(16,800, 61,200) |
60 mg |
(22,300, 81,500) 42,300 |
| 6 kg to less than 7.5 kg‡ |
80 mg |
29,400
(16,600, 54,100) |
40 mg |
(20,900, 71,800) 39,200 |
* Medians and 90% prediction intervals are based on simulations using the pediatric HSCT population
PK model with inter-individual variability.
† Includes pediatric patients 12 years of age and older or weighing ≥ 30 kg.
‡ Includes pediatric patients 6 months of age and older and weighing 6 kg to < 7.5 kg. |
Table 14: PREVYMIS AUC (ng•hr/mL) Values Following Once Daily IV Administration in Pediatric HSCT Recipients
| Body Weight |
IV Dose, No
Cyclosporine |
Steady-state
Median
(90% Prediction
Interval)* |
IV Dose, With
Cyclosporine |
Steady-state
Median
(90% Prediction
Interval)* |
| 30 kg and above† |
480 mg |
114,000
(53,900, 230,000) |
240 mg |
(29,300, 128,000) 61,400 |
| 15 kg to less than 30 kg |
120 mg |
56,400
(29,100, 110,000) |
120 mg |
(32,100, 114,000) 62,300 |
| 7.5 kg to less than 15 kg |
60 mg |
45,900
(24,500, 86,400) |
60 mg |
(26,300, 96,300) 49,900 |
| 6 kg to less than 7.5 kg‡ |
40 mg |
42,800
(23,800, 79,200) |
40 mg |
(26,300, 86,500) 46,400 |
* Medians and 90% prediction intervals are based on simulations using the pediatric HSCT population
PK model with inter-individual variability.
† Includes pediatric patients 12 years of age and older or weighing ≥ 30 kg.
‡ Includes pediatric patients 6 months of age and older and weighing 6 kg to < 7.5 kg |
Age, Gender, Race, And Weight
Age (18 to 82 years), gender, race, and body weight (up to 100 kg) did not have a clinically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of letermovir in adult subjects.
Renal Impairment
Clinical Study in a Renally Impaired Population
Letermovir AUC was approximately 1.9- and 1.4-fold higher in adult subjects with moderate (eGFR greater than or equal to 30 to 59 mL/min/1.73m2) and severe (eGFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73m2) renal impairment, respectively, compared to healthy adult subjects.
Post-kidney Transplant
Based on population pharmacokinetic analysis, letermovir AUC was approximately 1.1-, 1.3- and 1.4-fold higher in adult subjects with mild (CLcr greater than or equal to 60 to less than 90 mL/min), moderate (CLcr greater than or equal to 30 to less than 60 mL/min) and severe (CLcr greater than or equal to 15 to less than 30 mL/min) renal impairment, respectively, compared to adult subjects with CLcr greater than or equal to 90 mL/min.
Intravenous Formulation
Hydroxypropyl betadex present in the intravenous letermovir formulation is mainly eliminated by glomerular filtration. Decreased elimination of hydroxypropyl betadex has been reported in the literature in patients with severe renal impairment.
Hepatic Impairment
Letermovir AUC was approximately 1.6- and 3.8-fold higher in adult subjects with moderate (Child-Pugh Class B [CP-B], score of 7-9) and severe (Child-Pugh Class C [CP-C], score of 10-15) hepatic impairment, respectively, compared to healthy adult subjects.
Drug Interaction Studies
Drug interaction studies were performed in healthy adult subjects with PREVYMIS and drugs likely to be co-administered or drugs commonly used as probes for pharmacokinetic interactions (see Table 15 and Table 16).
In vitro results indicate that letermovir is a substrate of drug metabolizing enzymes CYP3A, CYP2D6, UGT1A1, and UGT1A3, and transporters OATP1B1/3 and P-gp. Oxidative metabolism is considered to be a minor elimination pathway based on in vivo human data. Inhibitors of OATP1B1/3 may result in increases in letermovir plasma concentrations. Changes in letermovir plasma concentrations due to inhibition of Pgp/ BCRP by itraconazole were not clinically relevant. Changes in letermovir plasma concentrations due to inhibition of UGTs are not anticipated to be clinically relevant.
Based on in vitro studies, the metabolism of letermovir is not mediated by CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C18, CYP2C19, CYP2E1, CYP4A11, UGT1A4, UGT1A6, UGT1A7, UGT1A8, UGT1A9, UGT1A10, UGT2B4, UGT2B7, UGT2B15, or UGT2B17. The transport of letermovir is not mediated by OATP2B1, OCT1, OAT1, BCRP, or MRP2 in vitro.
Letermovir is a time-dependent inhibitor and inducer of CYP3A in vitro. Co-administration of PREVYMIS with midazolam resulted in increased exposure of midazolam, indicating that the net effect of letermovir on CYP3A is moderate inhibition (see Table 16). Based on these results, co-administration of PREVYMIS with CYP3A substrates may increase the plasma concentrations of the CYP3A substrates [see CONTRAINDICATIONS and WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS and DRUG INTERACTIONS, and Table 11].
Letermovir is a reversible inhibitor of CYP2C8 in vitro. When co-administered with PREVYMIS, plasma concentrations of CYP2C8 substrates are predicted to be increased [see Table 11 in DRUG INTERACTIONS]. Co-administration of PREVYMIS reduced the exposure of voriconazole, most likely due to the induction of voriconazole elimination pathways, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19. Co-administration of PREVYMIS with CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 substrates may decrease the plasma concentrations of the CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 substrates [see Table 11 in DRUG INTERACTIONS]. Letermovir is an inducer of CYP2B6 in vitro; the clinical relevance is unknown.
Letermovir inhibited efflux transporters P-gp, breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), bile salt export pump (BSEP), multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (MRP2), OAT3, and hepatic uptake transporter OATP1B1/3 in vitro. Co-administration of PREVYMIS with substrates of OATP1B1/3 transporters (e.g., atorvastatin, a known substrate of CYP3A, OATP1B1/3, and potentially BCRP) may result in a clinically relevant increase in plasma concentrations of OATP1B1/3 substrates [see Table 11 in DRUG INTERACTIONS]. There were no clinically relevant changes in plasma concentrations of digoxin, a P-gp substrate, or acyclovir, an OAT3 substrate, following co-administration with PREVYMIS in clinical studies (see Table 16). The effect of letermovir on BCRP, BSEP, and MRP2 substrates was not evaluated in clinical studies; the clinical relevance is unknown.
Based on in vitro results letermovir is not an inhibitor of CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, UGT1A4, UGT1A6, UGT1A9, or UGT2B7 and is not an inducer of CYP1A2. Letermovir is not an inhibitor of OATP2B1, OCT1, OCT2, or OAT1 in vitro.
Table 15: Drug Interactions: Changes in Pharmacokinetics of Letermovir in the Presence of Co-administered Drug
| Co-administered Drug |
Regimen of Co administered Drug |
Letermovir Regimen |
Geometric Mean Ratio [90% CI] of Letermovir PK with/without Co-administered Drug
(No Effect=1.00) |
| AUC |
Cmax |
C24hr* |
| Antifungals |
| fluconazole |
400 mg single dose PO |
480 mg single dose
PO |
1.11
(1.01, 1.23) |
1.06
(0.93, 1.21) |
1.28
(1.15, 1.43) |
| itraconazole |
200 mg once daily PO |
480 mg once daily PO |
1.33
(1.17, 1.51) |
1.21
(1.05, 1.39) |
1.90
(1.58, 2.28) |
| Antimycobacterials |
| rifampin |
600 mg single dose PO |
480 mg single dose PO |
2.03
(1.84, 2.26) |
1.59
(1.46, 1.74) |
2.01
(1.59, 2.54) |
600 mg single
dose IV |
480 mg
single dose
PO |
1.58
(1.38, 1.81) |
1.37
(1.16, 1.61) |
0.78
(0.65, 0.93) |
600 mg once
daily PO |
480 mg
once daily
PO |
0.81
(0.67, 0.98) |
1.01
(0.79, 1.28) |
0.14
(0.11, 0.19) |
600 mg once
daily PO
(24 hours
after
rifampin)† |
480 mg
once daily
PO |
0.15
(0.13, 0.17) |
0.27
(0.22, 0.31) |
0.09
(0.06, 0.12) |
| Immunosuppressants |
| cyclosporine |
200 mg single
dose PO |
240 mg
once daily
PO |
2.11
(1.97, 2.26) |
1.48
(1.33, 1.65) |
2.06
(1.81, 2.35) |
mycophenolate
mofetil |
1 g single
dose PO |
480 mg
once daily
PO |
1.18
(1.04, 1.32) |
1.11
(0.92, 1.34) |
1.39
(1.12, 1.74) |
| tacrolimus |
5 mg single
dose PO |
80 mg
twice daily
PO |
1.02
(0.97, 1.07) |
0.92
(0.84, 1.00) |
1.02
(0.93, 1.12) |
Abbreviations: PO= oral
* C12hr for tacrolimus
† These data are the effect of rifampin on letermovir 24 hours after final rifampin dose. |
Table 16: Drug Interactions: Changes in Pharmacokinetics for Co-administered Drug in the Presence of Letermovir
| Co administered Drug |
Regimen of Co administered Drug |
Letermovir Regimen |
Geometric Mean Ratio [90% CI] of Co-administered Drug PK with/without Letermovir (No Effect=1.00) |
| AUC |
Cmax |
C24hr* |
| CYP3A Substrates |
| midazolam |
1 mg single dose IV |
240 mg once daily PO |
1.47
(1.37, 1.58) |
1.05
(0.94, 1.17) |
2.74
(2.16, 3.49) |
| 2 mg single dose PO |
240 mg once daily PO |
2.25
(2.04, 2.48) |
1.72
(1.55, 1.92) |
Not available |
| P-gp Substrates |
| digoxin |
0.5 mg single dose PO |
240 mg twice daily PO |
0.88
(0.80, 0.96) |
0.75
(0.63, 0.89) |
0.90
(0.84, 0.96) |
| Immunosuppressants |
| cyclosporine |
50 mg single dose PO |
240 mg once daily PO |
1.66
(1.51, 1.82) |
1.08
(0.97, 1.19) |
2.19
(1.80, 2.66) |
| mycophenolate mofetil |
1 g single dose PO |
480 mg once daily PO |
1.08
(0.97, 1.20) |
0.96
(0.82, 1.12) |
1.04
(0.86, 1.27) |
| tacrolimus |
5 mg single
dose PO |
480 mg once
daily PO |
2.42
(2.04, 2.88) |
1.57
(1.32, 1.86) |
2.53
(2.12, 3.03) |
| sirolimus |
2 mg single
dose PO |
480 mg once
daily PO |
3.40
(3.01, 3.85) |
2.76
(2.48, 3.06) |
3.15
(2.80, 3.55) |
| Antifungals and Antivirals |
| acyclovir |
400 mg single
dose PO |
480 mg once
daily PO |
1.02
(0.87, 1.2) |
0.82
(0.71, 0.93) |
1.13
(0.94, 1.36) |
| fluconazole |
400 mg single
dose PO |
480 mg single
dose PO |
1.03
(0.99, 1.08) |
0.95
(0.92, 0.99) |
1.04
(1.00, 1.08) |
| itraconazole |
200 mg once
daily PO |
480 mg once
daily PO |
0.76
(0.71, 0.81) |
0.84
(0.76, 0.92) |
0.67
(0.61, 0.73) |
| posaconazole |
300 mg single
dose PO |
480 mg once
daily PO |
0.98
(0.82, 1.17) |
1.11
(0.95, 1.29) |
1.10
(0.94, 1.30) |
| voriconazole |
200 mg twice
daily PO |
480 mg once
daily PO |
0.56
(0.51, 0.62) |
0.61
(0.53, 0.71) |
0.49
(0.42, 0.57) |
| HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors |
| atorvastatin |
20 mg single
dose PO |
480 mg once
daily PO |
3.29
(2.84, 3.82) |
2.17
(1.76, 2.67) |
3.62
(2.87, 4.55) |
| Oral Contraceptives |
ethinyl estradiol
(EE)
/levonorgestrel
(LNG) |
0.03 mg EE
single dose PO |
480 mg once
daily PO |
1.42
(1.32, 1.52) |
0.89
(0.83, 0.96) |
1.57
(1.45, 1.70) |
0.15 mg LNG
single dose PO |
1.36
(1.30, 1.43) |
0.95
(0.86, 1.04) |
1.38
(1.32, 1.46) |
Abbreviations: PO=oral
* C12hr reported for voriconazole |
Microbiology
Mechanism Of Action
Letermovir inhibits the CMV DNA terminase complex (pUL51, pUL56, and pUL89) which is required for viral DNA processing and packaging. Biochemical characterization and electron microscopy demonstrated that letermovir affects the production of proper unit length genomes and interferes with virion maturation. Genotypic characterization of virus resistant to letermovir confirmed that letermovir targets the terminase complex.
Antiviral Activity
The median EC50 value of letermovir against a collection of clinical CMV isolates in a cell-culture model of infection was 2.1 nM (range = 0.7 nM to 6.1 nM, n = 74). There was no significant difference in EC50 value by CMV gB genotype (gB1=29; gB2=27; gB3=11; and gB4=3).
Combination Antiviral Activity
No antagonism of the antiviral activity was seen when letermovir was combined with CMV DNA polymerase inhibitors (cidofovir, foscarnet, or ganciclovir).
Viral Resistance
In Cell Culture
CMV mutants with reduced susceptibility to letermovir have been selected in cell culture and the resistance mutations map to UL51, UL56, and UL89. Resistance-associated substitutions were found in pUL51 (P91S, A95V), pUL56 (C25F, S229F, V231A/L, N232Y, V236A/L/M, E237D, L241P, T244K/R, L254F, L257F/I, K258E, F261C/L/S, Y321C, C325F/R/W/Y, L328V, M329T, A365S, N368D, R369G/M/S), and pUL89 (N320H, D344E). EC50 values for recombinant CMV mutants expressing these substitutions are 1.6- to 9,300-fold higher than those for the wild-type reference virus.
In Clinical Studies
In a Phase 2b trial evaluating letermovir or placebo in 131 adult HSCT recipients, DNA sequence analysis of a select region of UL56 (amino acids 231 to 369) was performed on samples obtained from 12 letermovirtreated subjects who experienced prophylaxis failure and for whom on-treatment samples were available for analysis. One subject had a letermovir resistance substitution, pUL56 V236M (19-50-fold reduction in susceptibility).
In a Phase 3 trial (P001), DNA sequence analysis of the entire coding regions of UL56 and UL89 was performed on samples obtained from 50 letermovir-treated adult subjects who had received at least one dose of study drug and experienced prophylaxis failure and for whom samples were available for analysis.
The pUL56 substitutions V236M (19-50-fold reduction), E237G (13-fold reduction), C325W (9300-fold reduction), and R369T (52-fold reduction) were detected in 3 subjects; however, no 2 subjects had substitutions at the same positions.
In a Phase 3 trial (P040), DNA sequence analysis of the entire coding regions of UL51, UL56 and UL89 was performed on samples obtained from 32 adult subjects (regardless of treatment group) who experienced prophylaxis failure or who discontinued early with CMV viremia. No letermovir resistanceassociated substitutions were detected above the validated assay limit.
In a Phase 3 trial (P002), DNA sequence analysis of the entire coding regions of UL51, UL56 and UL89 was performed on samples obtained from 52 letermovir-treated adult subjects who experienced CMV disease or who discontinued early with CMV viremia. No previously characterized resistance-associated substitutions were identified. Novel substitutions were detected in letermovir-treated subjects at resistanceassociated positions (pUL56 S229Y [2-fold reduction; n=1] and pUL56 M329I [0.77-fold reduction; n=9]) at low frequencies, ranging between 0.05 to 0.07.
In a Phase 2b trial (P030), DNA sequence analysis of the entire coding regions of UL51, UL56 and UL89 was performed on samples obtained from 10 letermovir-treated pediatric subjects at a visit for evaluation of CMV infection. A total of 2 letermovir resistance-associated substitutions both mapping to pUL56 were detected in 2 subjects. One subject had the substitution C325W (9300-fold reduction), and the other had R369S (38-fold reduction).
Cross Resistance
Cross resistance is not likely with drugs outside of this class. Letermovir is fully active against viral populations with substitutions conferring resistance to CMV DNA polymerase inhibitors (cidofovir, foscarnet, and ganciclovir). These DNA polymerase inhibitors are expected to be fully active against viral populations with substitutions conferring resistance to letermovir.
Animal Toxicology And/Or Pharmacology
Testicular toxicity in rats observed at ≥180 mg/kg/day (greater than or equal to 3 times the human exposure at the RHD) was characterized by decreased testis weight, bilateral seminiferous tubular degeneration, decreased sperm count and motility, and resultant decreased male fertility. Male reproductive system toxicities were not observed in either a monkey testicular toxicity study up to 240 mg/kg/day (approximately 2 times higher than human exposure at the RHD), or a general toxicology study in mice up to 250 mg/kg/day (approximately 3 times higher than human exposure at the RHD).
The excipient, hydroxypropyl betadex, present in the IV letermovir formulation, has been associated with hearing loss resulting from damage to the inner ear in multiple animal species. In published studies in rats, a single subcutaneous dose of 2000 mg/kg hydroxypropyl betadex resulted in changes in hearing parameters and associated decreases in outer hair cells in the inner ear. These findings were observed at hydroxypropyl betadex levels approximately 3 times higher than those present in the letermovir IV drug product at the MRHD, based on body surface area (BSA) comparisons. No adverse changes in hearing parameters or hair cell populations in the inner ear were observed in rats following a single subcutaneous dose of 1000 mg/kg hydroxypropyl betadex, which corresponds to levels approximately 1.5 times higher than those present in the letermovir IV drug product at the MRHD, based on BSA comparisons [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS].
Clinical Studies
Overview Of Clinical Studies
An overview of the trials contributing to the assessment of efficacy and safety of PREVYMIS in HSCT and kidney transplant recipients is provided in Table 17.
Table 17: Trials Conducted with PREVYMIS
Trial
(NCT Number) |
Population |
Trial Arms (N)* |
Duration of Prophylaxis Post-Transplant |
Efficacy Endpoint |
| P001 (NCT02137772) |
Adult allogeneic HSCT recipients [R+] |
PREVYMIS (373) Placebo (192) |
Through Week 14 |
Clinically significant CMV infection through Week 24 post HSCT |
| P040 (NCT03930615) |
Adult allogeneic HSCT recipients [R+] at risk for late CMV infection and disease |
PREVYMIS (144) Placebo (74) |
Extension of prophylaxis from Week 14 through Week 28 |
Clinically significant CMV infection through Week 28 post HSCT |
| P002 (NCT03443869) |
Adult kidney transplant recipients [D+/R-] |
PREVYMIS (292) Valganciclovir (297) |
Through Week 28 |
CMV disease through Week 52 post-kidney transplant |
| P030 (NCT03940586) |
Pediatric allogeneic HSCT recipients |
PREVYMIS (63) |
Through Week 14 |
Clinically significant CMV infection through Week 24 post HSCT |
| * N represents the number of subjects treated |
Adult CMV-Seropositive Recipients [R+] Of An Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (Trial P001 And Trial P040)
Prophylaxis Through Week 14 (~100 Days) Post-HSCT (Trial P001)
To evaluate PREVYMIS prophylaxis as a preventive strategy for CMV infection or disease in transplant recipients at high risk for CMV reactivation, the efficacy of PREVYMIS was assessed in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 Trial (P001, NCT02137772) in adult CMV-seropositive recipients [R+] of an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Subjects were randomized (2:1) to receive either PREVYMIS at a dose of 480 mg once daily adjusted to 240 mg when co-administered with cyclosporine, or placebo. Randomization was stratified by investigational site and risk level for CMV reactivation at the time of study entry. Study drug was initiated after HSCT (at any time from Day 0 to Day 28 post-HSCT) and continued through Week 14 post-HSCT. Study drug was administered either orally or intravenously; the dose of PREVYMIS was the same regardless of the route of administration. Subjects received CMV DNA monitoring weekly until post-HSCT Week 14 and then bi-weekly until post-HSCT Week 24, with initiation of standard-of-care CMV pre-emptive therapy if CMV viremia was considered clinically significant. Subjects had continued follow-up through Week 48 post-HSCT.
Among the 565 treated subjects, 70 subjects were found to have CMV viremia prior to study drug initiation and were therefore excluded from the efficacy analyses. The efficacy population consisted of 325 subjects who received PREVYMIS (including 91 subjects who received at least one IV dose) and 170 who received placebo (including 41 subjects who received at least one IV dose). The IV formulation of PREVYMIS was used at investigators’ discretion in subjects who were unable to take oral therapy (e.g., unable to tolerate oral intake). The median time to starting study drug was 8 days after transplantation. Thirty-four percent (34%) of subjects were engrafted at baseline. The median age was 55 years (range: 18 to 76 years). 57% were male; 84% were White; 9% were Asian; 2% were Black or African American; and 5% were other (American Indian or Alaska Native, multiple, and missing). 7% were Hispanic or Latino; 89% not Hispanic or Latino; and 4% other (not reported, unknown, and missing).
At baseline, 30% of all subjects had one or more of the following factors associated with increased risk for CMV reactivation (high risk stratum): Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)-related donor with at least one mismatch at one of the following three HLA-gene loci: HLA-A, -B or –DR; haploidentical donor; unrelated donor with at least one mismatch at one of the following four HLA-gene loci: HLA-A, -B, -C and -DRB1; use of umbilical cord blood as stem cell source; use of ex vivo T-cell-depleted grafts; Grade 2 or greater Graft- Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) requiring systemic corticosteroids. The remaining 70% of subjects did not meet any of these high risk stratum criteria and were therefore included in the low risk stratum. Additionally, 48% of subjects received a myeloablative regimen, 51% were receiving cyclosporine, and 43% were receiving tacrolimus. The most common primary reasons for transplant were acute myeloid leukemia (38%), myelodysplastic syndrome (16%), and lymphoma (12%).
Clinically Significant CMV Infection
The primary efficacy endpoint of Trial P001 was the incidence of clinically significant CMV infection through Week 24 post-HSCT (prophylaxis failure). Clinically significant CMV infection was defined as the occurrence of either CMV end-organ disease, or initiation of anti-CMV pre-emptive therapy (PET) based on documented CMV viremia (using the Roche COBAS® AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan® assay, LLoQ is 137 IU/mL, which is approximately 150 copies/mL) and the clinical condition of the subject. The protocolspecified guidance for CMV DNA thresholds for the initiation of PET during the treatment period was ≥ 150 copies/mL or > 300 copies/mL for subjects in the high and low risk strata, respectively. From Week 14 through Week 24, the threshold was >300 copies/mL for both high and low risk strata subjects. The Non- Completer=Failure (NC=F) approach was used, where subjects who discontinued from the trial prior to Week 24 post-HSCT or had a missing outcome at Week 24 post-HSCT were counted as failures.
Efficacy results from Trial P001 are shown in Table 18.
Table 18: Trial P001 Incidence of Clinically Significant CMV Infection in HSCT Recipients (NC=F Approach, FAS Population) Through Week 24
| Parameter |
PREVYMIS
(N=325) |
Placebo
(N=170) |
| Proportion of subjects who failed prophylaxis Reasons for failures* |
38% |
61% |
| Clinically significant CMV infection by Week 24† |
18% |
42% |
| Initiation of PET based on documented CMV viremia |
16% |
40% |
| CMV end-organ disease |
2% |
2% |
| Discontinued from study before Week 24‡ |
17% |
16% |
| Missing outcome in Week 24 visit window |
3% |
3% |
| Stratum-adjusted treatment difference (PREVYMIS-Placebo)§ |
| Difference (95% CI) |
-23.5 (-32.5, -14.6)¶ |
|
* The categories of failure are mutually exclusive and based on the hierarchy of categories in the order listed.
† Through Week 14, 8% of subjects in the PREVYMIS group and 39% of subjects in the placebo group experienced clinically significant CMV infection.
‡ Reasons for discontinuation included adverse event, death, lost to follow-up, physician decision, and withdrawal by subject.
§ 95% CI and p-value for the treatment differences in percent response were calculated using stratum-adjusted Mantel-Haenszel method with the difference weighted by the harmonic mean of sample size per arm for each stratum (high or low risk).
¶ p-value <0.0001.
Note: FAS=Full analysis set; FAS includes randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication, and excludes subjects with detectable CMV DNA at baseline. Approach to handling missing values: Non-Completer=Failure (NC=F) approach. With NC=F approach, failure was defined as all subjects who developed clinically significant CMV infection or prematurely discontinued from the study or had a missing outcome through Week 24 post-HSCT visit window |
Figure 1: P001: Kaplan-Meier Plot of Time to Onset of Clinically Significant CMV Infection Through
Post-hoc analysis demonstrated that among PREVYMIS-treated subjects, inclusion in the high risk stratum for CMV reactivation at baseline, occurrence of GVHD, and steroid use at any time after randomization may be associated with the development of clinically significant CMV infection between Week 14 and Week 24 post-HSCT.
Mortality
The Kaplan-Meier event rate for all-cause mortality in the PREVYMIS vs. placebo groups was 12% vs. 17% at Week 24 post-HSCT, and 24% vs. 28% at Week 48 post-HSCT.
Prophylaxis From Week 14 (~100 Days) Through Week 28 (~200 Days) Post-HSCT (Trial P040)
The efficacy of extending PREVYMIS prophylaxis from Week 14 (~100 days) through Week 28 (~200 days) post-HSCT in patients at risk for late CMV infection and disease was assessed in a multicenter, doubleblind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 trial (P040, NCT03930615) in adult CMV-seropositive recipients [R+] of an allogeneic HSCT. Eligible subjects who completed PREVYMIS prophylaxis through ~100 days post- HSCT were randomized (2:1) to receive PREVYMIS or placebo from Week 14 through Week 28 post- HSCT. Subjects received PREVYMIS at a dose of 480 mg once daily (adjusted to 240 mg when coadministered with cyclosporine) or placebo. Study drug was administered either orally or IV; the dose of
PREVYMIS was the same regardless of the route of administration. One subject received IV PREVYMIS for 2 days. Subjects were monitored through Week 28 post-HSCT for the primary efficacy endpoint with continued off-treatment follow-up through Week 48 post-HSCT.
Among the 218 treated subjects, 144 subjects received PREVYMIS and 74 received placebo. The median age was 55 years (range: 20 to 74 years); 62% were male; 79% were white; 11% were Asian; 2% were Black; 1% were multiple races; 6% had missing race; and 10% were Hispanic or Latino.
At study entry, all subjects had risk factors for late CMV infection and disease, with 64% having two or more risk factors. The risk factors included: HLA-related (sibling) donor with at least one mismatch at one of the following three HLA-gene loci: HLA-A, -B or –DR; haploidentical donor; unrelated donor with at least one mismatch at one of the following four HLA-gene loci: HLA-A, -B, -C and -DRB1; use of umbilical cord blood as stem cell source; use of ex vivo T-cell-depleted grafts; receipt of anti-thymocyte globulin; receipt of alemtuzumab; use of systemic prednisone (or equivalent) at a dose of ≥1 mg/kg of body weight per day.
The most common reasons for transplant were acute myeloid leukemia (42%), acute lymphocytic leukemia (15%), and myelodysplastic syndrome (11%).
Clinically Significant CMV Infection
The primary efficacy endpoint of Trial P040 was the incidence of clinically significant CMV infection through Week 28 post-HSCT. Clinically significant CMV infection was defined as the occurrence of either CMV endorgan disease, or initiation of anti-CMV PET based on documented CMV viremia and the clinical condition of the subject. The Observed Failure (OF) approach was used, where subjects who discontinued prematurely from the study without viremia or were missing data at the timepoint were not counted as failures. The number of subjects who discontinued from the study before Week 28 without viremia was 14 (9.7%) in the PREVYMIS arm and 0 in the placebo arm. The number of subjects with a missing outcome in the Week 28 visit window was 3 (2.1%) in the PREVYMIS arm and 4 (5.4%) in the placebo arm, none had prior viremia.
Efficacy results from Trial P040 are shown in Table 19. Efficacy was consistent across subgroups based on participant characteristics (age, gender, race) and risk factors for late CMV infection and disease.
Table 19: Trial P040 Efficacy Results in HSCT Recipients at Risk for Late CMV Infection and Disease (OF Approach, FAS Population)
| Parameter |
PREVYMIS
(~200 days
PREVYMIS)
(N=144) |
Placebo
(~100 days
PREVYMIS)
(N=74) |
| Failures* |
2.8% |
18.9% |
| Clinically significant CMV infection from Week 14 through Week 28† |
1.4% |
17.6% |
| Initiation of PET based on documented CMV viremia |
0.7% |
14.9% |
| CMV end-organ disease |
0.7% |
2.7% |
| Discontinued from study with CMV viremia before Week 28 |
1.4% |
1.4% |
| Stratum-adjusted treatment difference (PREVYMIS (~200 days PREVYMIS)- Placebo (~100 days PREVYMIS))‡ |
| Difference (95% CI) |
-16.1
(-25.8, -6.5)§ |
|
* The categories of failure are mutually exclusive and based on the hierarchy of categories in the order listed.
† Clinically significant CMV infection was defined as CMV end-organ disease (proven or probable) or initiation of PET based on documented CMV viremia and the clinical condition of the subject.
‡ The 95% CIs and p-value for the treatment differences in percent response were calculated using stratumadjusted Mantel-Haenszel method with the difference weighted by the harmonic mean of sample size per arm for each stratum (haploidentical donor yes or no). A one-sided p-value ≤0.0249 was used for declaring statistical significance.
§ p-value = 0.0005
Approach to handling missing values: Observed Failure (OF) approach. With the OF approach, failure was defined as all subjects who developed clinically significant CMV infection or discontinued prematurely from the study with CMV viremia from Week 14 (~100 days) through Week 28 (~200 days) post-HSCT.
N = Number of subjects in each treatment group |
The time to clinically significant CMV infection is shown in Figure 2. Among subjects in the PREVYMIS group, the cumulative rate of clinically significant CMV infection increased from 1.6% at the end of prophylaxis (Week 28) to 15.6% at Week 38. In the placebo group, the cumulative rate of clinically significant CMV infection increased from 17.6% at Week 28 to 19.0% at Week 38. There were no additional cases of clinically significant CMV infection in either group between Weeks 38 and 48 [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION].
Figure 2: Trial P040 Kaplan-Meier Plot of Time to Onset of Clinically Significant CMV Infection From Week 14 Through Week 48 Post-transplant in HSCT Recipients at Risk for Late CMV Infection and Disease (FAS Population)
 |
| LET = Letermovir; PBO = Placebo |
Adult CMV-Seronegative Recipients Of A Kidney Transplant From A CMV-Seropositive Donor [D+/R-] (Trial P002)
To evaluate PREVYMIS prophylaxis as a preventive strategy for CMV disease in kidney transplant recipients, the efficacy of PREVYMIS was assessed in a multicenter, double-blind, active comparatorcontrolled non-inferiority Phase 3 trial (P002, NCT03443869) in adult kidney transplant recipients at high risk [D+/R-]. Subjects were randomized (1:1) to receive either PREVYMIS or valganciclovir. PREVYMIS was administered at a dose of 480 mg once daily (adjusted to 240 mg when co-administered with cyclosporine). PREVYMIS was given concomitantly with acyclovir. Valganciclovir was given concomitantly with a placebo to acyclovir. Randomization was stratified by the use or nonuse of highly cytolytic, antilymphocyte immunotherapy during induction. Study drug was initiated between Day 0 and Day 7 postkidney transplant and continued through Week 28 (~200 days) post-transplant. Study drug was administered either orally or IV; the dose of PREVYMIS was the same regardless of the route of administration. Three subjects received IV PREVYMIS for a mean duration of 1.7 days. Subjects were monitored through Week 52 post-transplant.
Among the 589 treated subjects, 292 subjects received PREVYMIS and 297 received valganciclovir. The median age was 51 years (range: 18 to 82 years); 72% were male; 84% were White; 9% were Black; 3% were multiple; 2% were Asian; 1% Alaskan native or American Indian; 17% were Hispanic or Latino; and 60% received a kidney from a deceased donor. The most common primary reasons for transplant were congenital cystic kidney disease (17%), hypertension (16%), and diabetes/diabetic nephropathy (14%).
CMV Disease
The primary efficacy endpoint of Trial P002 was the incidence of CMV disease (CMV end-organ disease or CMV syndrome, confirmed by an independent adjudication committee) through Week 52 post-transplant. The Observed Failure (OF) approach was used, where subjects who discontinued prematurely from the study for any reason or were missing data at the timepoint were not counted as failures. The number of subjects who discontinued from the study before Week 52 was 32 (11%) in the PREVYMIS arm and 28 (9%) in the valganciclovir arm. The number of subjects with a missing outcome in the Week 52 visit window was 24 (8%) in the PREVYMIS arm and 25 (8%) in the valganciclovir arm.
Efficacy results from Trial P002 are shown in Table 20.
Table 20: Trial P002 Incidence of CMV Disease in Kidney Transplant Recipients (OF Approach, FAS Population) Through Week 52
| Parameter |
PREVYMIS (N=289) |
Valganciclovir (N=297) |
| CMV Disease* Through Week 52 |
10% |
12% |
| CMV Syndrome† |
8% |
11% |
| CMV End-organ Disease |
2% |
<1% |
Stratum-adjusted Treatment Difference‡
(PREVYMIS – Valganciclovir) |
-1.4 (-6.5, 3.8)§ |
* CMV disease cases confirmed by an independent adjudication committee.
† Defined as evidence of CMV in blood by viral isolation, rapid culture, antigenemia, or nucleic acid testing, and two or more of the following: 1) fever ≥38°C for at least 2 days, 2) new or increased malaise/fatigue, 3) leukopenia or neutropenia on two separate measurements at least 24 hours apart, 4) ≥5% atypical lymphocytes, 5) thrombocytopenia, 6) elevation of ALT or AST to 2x ULN.
‡ The 95% CIs for the treatment differences in percent response were calculated using stratum-adjusted Mantel- Haenszel method with the difference weighted by the harmonic mean of sample size per arm for each stratum (use/non-use of highly cytolytic, anti-lymphocyte immunotherapy during induction).
§ Based on a non-inferiority margin of 10%, PREVYMIS is non-inferior to valganciclovir.
Note: Approach to handling missing values: Observed failure (OF) approach. With OF approach, subjects who discontinued from the study before Week 52 or had a missing outcome in the Week 52 visit window were not counted as failures. |
Efficacy was comparable across all subgroups, including the use/nonuse of highly cytolytic, antilymphocyte immunotherapy during induction.
In an exploratory analysis of the incidence of CMV disease through Week 28 post-transplant, the difference (PREVYMIS – Valganciclovir) was -1.7% with 95% CI of (-3.4, 0.1). No subjects in the PREVYMIS group experienced CMV disease through Week 28 post-transplant (end of treatment period) compared with 5 subjects in the valganciclovir group.
Pediatric Recipients Of An Allogeneic HSCT (Trial P030)
Sixty-three children 2 months to less than 18 years of age who had an allogeneic HSCT were enrolled in a multicenter, open-label, single-arm pharmacokinetic, safety and effectiveness study of PREVYMIS (P030, NCT03940586). Subjects received PREVYMIS daily either orally or intravenously for CMV prophylaxis within 28 days post-HSCT through Week 14 post-HSCT. The intravenous formulation was used for up to four weeks in subjects who were unable to take oral therapy. The daily doses of PREVYMIS were based on body weight [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION]. Among the 63 treated subjects, 8 were 2 months to less than 2 years of age, 27 were 2 to less than 12 years of age and 28 were 12 to less than 18 years of age. The median age was 11 years; 70% were male; 70% were White; 14% were Asian; 5% were Black; and 22% were Hispanic or Latino [see Use In Specific Populations].
The efficacy analyses population consisted of 56 subjects who received at least one dose of study drug and had no detectable CMV DNA at baseline. The proportion of subjects who failed CMV prophylaxis through Week 24 post-HSCT was 25% (14 of the 56 subjects). Six subjects had initiation of pre-emptive therapy based on CMV viremia and 8 subjects discontinued from the study before Week 24. None of the subjects had CMV end-organ disease.
PREVYMIS is indicated for pediatric recipients of an allogeneic HSCT aged 6 months and older and weighing at least 6 kg.