CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism Of Action
Precedex is a relatively selective alpha -adrenergic
agonist with sedative properties. Alpha selectivity is observed in animals
following slow intravenous infusion of low and medium doses (10- 300 mcg/kg).
Both alpha and alpha activity is observed following slow intravenous infusion
of high doses ( ≥ 1000 mcg/kg) or with rapid intravenous administration.
Pharmacodynamics
In a study in healthy volunteers (N = 10), respiratory
rate and oxygen saturation remained within normal limits and there was no
evidence of respiratory depression when Precedex was administered by intravenous
infusion at doses within the recommended dose range (0.2-0.7 mcg/kg/hr).
Pharmacokinetics
Following intravenous administration, dexmedetomidine
exhibits the following pharmacokinetic parameters: a rapid distribution phase
with a distribution half-life (t½) of approximately 6 minutes; a terminal
elimination half-life (t½) of approximately 2 hours; and steady-state volume
of distribution (Vss) of approximately 118 liters. Clearance is estimated to be
approximately 39 L/h. The mean body weight associated with this clearance
estimate was 72 kg.
Dexmedetomidine exhibits linear pharmacokinetics in the
dosage range of 0.2 to 0.7 mcg/kg/hr when administered by intravenous infusion
for up to 24 hours. Table 8 shows the main pharmacokinetic parameters when
Precedex was infused (after appropriate loading doses) at maintenance infusion
rates of 0.17 mcg/kg/hr (target plasma concentration of 0.3 ng/mL) for 12 and
24 hours, 0.33 mcg/kg/hr (target plasma concentration of 0.6 ng/mL) for 24
hours, and 0.70 mcg/kg/hr (target plasma concentration of 1.25 ng/mL) for 24
hours.
Table 8: Mean ± SD Pharmacokinetic Parameters
|
Loading Infusion (min)/Total Infusion Duration (hrs) |
10 min/12 hrs |
10 min/24 hrs |
10 min/24 hrs |
35 min/24 hrs |
Dexmedetomidine Target Plasma Concentration (ng/mL) and Dose (mcg/kg/hr) |
Parameter |
0.3/0.17 |
0.3/0.17 |
0.6/0.33 |
1.25/0.70 |
t½*, hour |
1.78 ± 0.30 |
2.22 ± 0.59 |
2.23 ± 0.21 |
2.50 ± 0.61 |
CL, liter/hour |
46.3 ± 8.3 |
43.1 ± 6.5 |
35.3 ± 6.8 |
36.5 ± 7.5 |
Vss, liter |
88.7 ± 22.9 |
102.4 ± 20.3 |
93.6 ± 17.0 |
99.6 ± 17.8 |
Avg Css#, ng/mL |
0.27 ± 0.05 |
0.27 ± 0.05 |
0.67 ± 0.10 |
1.37 ± 0.20 |
*Presented as harmonic mean and pseudo standard
deviation.
# Mean Css= Average steady-state concentration of Dexmedetomidine. The mean Css
was calculated based on post-dose sampling from 2.5 to 9 hours samples for 12
hour infusion and postdose sampling from 2.5 to 18 hours for 24 hour infusions. |
The loading doses for each of the above indicated groups
were 0.5, 0.5, 1 and 2.2 mcg/kg, respectively.
Dexmedetomidine pharmacokinetic parameters after Precedex
maintenance doses of 0.2 to 1.4 mcg/kg/hr for > 24 hours were similar to the
PK parameters after Precedex maintenance dosing for < 24 hours in other
studies. The values for clearance (CL), volume of distribution (V), and t½
were 39.4 L/hr, 152 L, and 2.67 hours, respectively.
Distribution
The steady-state volume of distribution (Vss) of
dexmedetomidine was approximately 118 liters. Dexmedetomidine protein binding
was assessed in the plasma of normal healthy male and female subjects. The
average protein binding was 94% and was constant across the different plasma concentrations
tested. Protein binding was similar in males and females. The fraction of
Precedex that was bound to plasma proteins was significantly decreased in
subjects with hepatic impairment compared to healthy subjects.
The potential for protein binding displacement of
dexmedetomidine by fentanyl, ketorolac, theophylline, digoxin and lidocaine was
explored in vitro, and negligible changes in the plasma protein binding of Precedex
were observed. The potential for protein binding displacement of phenytoin,
warfarin, ibuprofen, propranolol, theophylline and digoxin by Precedex was
explored in vitro and none of these compounds appeared to be significantly
displaced by Precedex.
Metabolism
Dexmedetomidine undergoes almost complete biotransformation
with very little unchanged dexmedetomidine excreted in urine and feces.
Biotransformation involves both direct glucuronidation as well as cytochrome
P450 mediated metabolism. The major metabolic pathways of dexmedetomidine are: direct
N-glucuronidation to inactive metabolites; aliphatic hydroxylation (mediated
primarily by CYP2A6 with a minor role of CYP1A2, CYP2E1, CYP2D6 and CYP2C19) of
dexmedetomidine to generate 3-hydroxy-dexmedetomidine, the glucuronide of
3-hydroxy-dexmedetomidine, and 3-carboxydexmedetomidine; and N-methylation of
dexmedetomidine to generate 3-hydroxy N-methyldexmedetomidine, 3-carboxy
N-methyl-dexmedetomidine, and dexmedetomidine-N-methyl Oglucuronide.
Elimination
The terminal elimination half-life (t½) of dexmedetomidine
is approximately 2 hours and clearance is estimated to be approximately 39 L/h.
A mass balance study demonstrated that after nine days an average of 95% of the
radioactivity, following intravenous administration of radiolabeled
dexmedetomidine, was recovered in the urine and 4% in the feces. No unchanged
dexmedetomidine was detected in the urine. Approximately 85% of the
radioactivity recovered in the urine was excreted within 24 hours after the
infusion. Fractionation of the radioactivity excreted in urine demonstrated
that products of Nglucuronidation accounted for approximately 34% of the
cumulative urinary excretion. In addition, aliphatic hydroxylation of parent
drug to form 3-hydroxy-dexmedetomidine, the glucuronide of 3- hydroxy-dexmedetomidine,
and 3-carboxylic acid-dexmedetomidine together represented approximately 14% of
the dose in urine. N-methylation of dexmedetomidine to form 3-hydroxy N-methyl dexmedetomidine,
3-carboxy N-methyl dexmedetomidine, and N-methyl O-glucuronide dexmedetomidine
accounted for approximately 18% of the dose in urine. The N-Methyl metabolite itself
was a minor circulating component and was undetected in urine. Approximately
28% of the urinary metabolites have not been identified.
Gender
There was no observed difference in Precedex
pharmacokinetics due to gender.
Geriatrics
The pharmacokinetic profile of Precedex was not altered
by age. There were no differences in the pharmacokinetics of Precedex in young
(18-40 years), middle age (41-65 years), and elderly ( > 65 years) subjects.
Hepatic Impairment
In subjects with varying degrees of hepatic impairment
(Child-Pugh Class A, B, or C), clearance values for Precedex were lower than in
healthy subjects. The mean clearance values for patients with mild, moderate,
and severe hepatic impairment were 74%, 64% and 53% of those observed in the
normal healthy subjects, respectively. Mean clearances for free drug were 59%,
51% and 32% of those observed in the normal healthy subjects, respectively.
Although Precedex is dosed to effect, it may be necessary
to consider dose reduction in subjects with hepatic impairment [see DOSAGE
AND ADMINISTRATION, WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS].
Renal Impairment
Dexmedetomidine pharmacokinetics (Cmax, Tmax, AUC, t½,
CL, and Vss) were not significantly different in patients with severe renal
impairment (creatinine clearance: < 30 mL/min) compared to healthy subjects.
Drug Interactions
In vitro studies: In vitro studies in human liver
microsomes demonstrated no evidence of cytochrome P450 mediated drug
interactions that are likely to be of clinical relevance.
Animal Pharmacology And/Or Toxicology
There were no differences in the adrenocorticotropic
hormone (ACTH)-stimulated cortisol response in dogs following a single dose of
dexmedetomidine compared to saline control. However, after continuous
subcutaneous infusions of dexmedetomidine at 3 mcg/kg/hr and 10 mcg/kg/hr for
one week in dogs (exposures estimated to be within the clinical range), the
ACTH-stimulated cortisol response was diminished by approximately 27% and 40%,
respectively, compared to saline-treated control animals indicating a
dose-dependent adrenal suppression.
Clinical Studies
The safety and efficacy of Precedex has been evaluated in
four randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled multicenter clinical trials in
1185 adult patients.
Intensive Care Unit Sedation
Two randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled
multicenter clinical trials included 754 adult patients being treated in a
surgical intensive care unit. All patients were initially intubated and received
mechanical ventilation. These trials evaluated the sedative properties of
Precedex by comparing the amount of rescue medication (midazolam in one trial
and propofol in the second) required to achieve a specified level of sedation
(using the standardized Ramsay Sedation Scale) between Precedex and placebo
from onset of treatment to extubation or to a total treatment duration of 24
hours. The Ramsay Level of Sedation Scale is displayed in Table 9.
Table 9: Ramsay Level of Sedation Scale
Clinical Score |
Level of Sedation Achieved |
6 |
Asleep, no response |
5 |
Asleep, sluggish response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus |
4 |
Asleep, but with brisk response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus |
3 |
Patient responds to commands |
2 |
Patient cooperative, oriented, and tranquil |
1 |
Patient anxious, agitated, or restless |
In the first study, 175 adult patients were randomized to
receive placebo and 178 to receive Precedex by intravenous infusion at a dose
of 0.4 mcg/kg/hr (with allowed adjustment between 0.2 and 0.7 mcg/kg/hr) following
an initial loading infusion of one mcg/kg intravenous over 10 minutes. The
study drug infusion rate was adjusted to maintain a Ramsay sedation score of
≥ 3. Patients were allowed to receive “rescue” midazolam as
needed to augment the study drug infusion. In addition, morphine sulfate was administered
for pain as needed. The primary outcome measure for this study was the total
amount of rescue medication (midazolam) needed to maintain sedation as
specified while intubated. Patients randomized to placebo received
significantly more midazolam than patients randomized to Precedex (see Table
10).
A second prospective primary analysis assessed the
sedative effects of Precedex by comparing the percentage of patients who
achieved a Ramsay sedation score of ≥ 3 during intubation without the use
of additional rescue medication. A significantly greater percentage of patients
in the Precedex group maintained a Ramsay sedation score of ≥ 3 without
receiving any midazolam rescue compared to the placebo group (see Table 10).
Table 10: Midazolam Use as Rescue Medication During
Intubation (ITT) Study One
|
Placebo
(N = 175) |
Precedex
(N = 178) |
p-value |
Mean Total Dose (mg) of Midazolam |
19 mg |
5 mg |
0.0011* |
Standard deviation |
53 mg |
19 mg |
|
Categorized Midazolam Use |
0 mg |
43 (25%) |
108 (61%) |
< 0.001** |
0-4 mg |
34 (19%) |
36 (20%) |
|
> 4 mg |
98 (56%) |
34 (19%) |
|
ITT (intent-to-treat) population includes all randomized
patients.
* ANOVA model with treatment center.
** Chi-square. |
A prospective secondary analysis assessed the dose of
morphine sulfate administered to patients in the Precedex and placebo groups.
On average, Precedex-treated patients received less morphine sulfate for pain
than placebo-treated patients (0.47 versus 0.83 mg/h). In addition, 44% (79 of
178 patients) of Precedex patients received no morphine sulfate for pain versus
19% (33 of 175 patients) in the placebo group.
In a second study, 198 adult patients were randomized to
receive placebo and 203 to receive Precedex by intravenous infusion at a dose
of 0.4 mcg/kg/hr (with allowed adjustment between 0.2 and 0.7 mcg/kg/hr)
following an initial loading infusion of one mcg/kg intravenous over 10
minutes. The study drug infusion was adjusted to maintain a Ramsay sedation
score of ≥ 3. Patients were allowed to receive “rescue” propofol
as needed to augment the study drug infusion. In addition, morphine sulfate was
administered as needed for pain. The primary outcome measure for this study was
the total amount of rescue medication (propofol) needed to maintain sedation as
specified while intubated.
Patients randomized to placebo received significantly
more propofol than patients randomized to Precedex (see Table 11).
A significantly greater percentage of patients in the
Precedex group compared to the placebo group maintained a Ramsay sedation score
of ≥ 3 without receiving any propofol rescue (see Table 11).
Table 11: Propofol Use as Rescue Medication During
Intubation (ITT) Study Two
|
Placebo
(N = 198) |
Precedex
(N = 203) |
p-value |
Mean Total Dose (mg) of Propofol |
513 mg |
72 mg |
< 0.0001* |
Standard deviation |
782 mg |
249 mg |
|
Categorized Propofol Use |
0 mg |
47 (24%) |
122 (60%) |
< 0.001** |
0-50 mg |
30 (15%) |
43 (21%) |
|
> 50 mg |
121 (61%) |
38 (19%) |
|
* ANOVA model with treatment center.
** Chi-square |
A prospective secondary analysis assessed the dose of
morphine sulfate administered to patients in the Precedex and placebo groups.
On average, Precedex-treated patients received less morphine sulfate for pain
than placebo-treated patients (0.43 versus 0.89 mg/h). In addition, 41% (83 of
203 patients) of Precedex patients received no morphine sulfate for pain versus
15% (30 of 198 patients) in the placebo group.
In a controlled clinical trial, Precedex was compared to
midazolam for ICU sedation exceeding 24 hours duration. Precedex was not shown
to be superior to midazolam for the primary efficacy endpoint, the percent of
time patients were adequately sedated (81% versus 81%). In addition, administration
of Precedex for longer than 24 hours was associated with tolerance,
tachyphylaxis, and a dose-related increase in adverse events [see ADVERSE
REACTIONS].
Procedural Sedation
The safety and efficacy of Precedex for sedation of
non-intubated patients prior to and/or during surgical and other procedures was
evaluated in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter
clinical trials. Study 1 evaluated the sedative properties of Precedex in
patients having a variety of elective surgeries/procedures performed under
monitored anesthesia care. Study 2 evaluated Precedex in patients undergoing
awake fiberoptic intubation prior to a surgical or diagnostic procedure.
In Study 1, the sedative properties of Precedex were
evaluated by comparing the percent of patients not requiring rescue midazolam
to achieve a specified level of sedation using the standardized Observer's Assessment
of Alertness/Sedation Scale (see Table 12).
Table 12: Observer's Assessment of Alertness /Sedation
Responsiveness |
Assessment Categories |
Speech |
Facial Expression |
Eyes |
Composite Score |
Responds readily to name spoken in normal tone |
Normal |
Normal |
Clear, no ptosis |
5 (alert) |
Lethargic response to name spoken in normal tone |
Mild slowing or thickening |
Mild relaxation |
Glazed or mild ptosis (less than half the eye) |
4 |
Responds only after name is called loudly and/or repeatedly |
Slurring or prominent slowing |
Marked relaxation (slack jaw) |
Glazed and marked ptosis (half the eye or more) |
3 |
Responds only after mild prodding or shaking |
Few recognizable words |
- |
- |
2 |
Does not respond to mild prodding or shaking |
- |
- |
- |
1 (deep sleep) |
Patients were randomized to receive a loading infusion of
either Precedex 1 mcg/kg, Precedex 0.5 mcg/kg, or placebo (normal saline) given
over 10 minutes and followed by a maintenance infusion started at 0.6
mcg/kg/hr. The maintenance infusion of study drug could be titrated from 0.2
mcg/kg/hr to 1 mcg/kg/hr to achieve the targeted sedation score (Observer's
Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale ≤ 4). Patients were allowed to
receive rescue midazolam as needed to achieve and/or maintain an Observer's
Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale ≤ 4. After achieving the desired
level of sedation, a local or regional anesthetic block was performed.
Demographic characteristics were similar between the Precedex and comparator
groups. Efficacy results showed that Precedex was more effective than the
comparator group when used to sedate non-intubated patients requiring monitored
anesthesia care during surgical and other procedures (see Table 13).
In Study 2, the sedative properties of Precedex were
evaluated by comparing the percent of patients requiring rescue midazolam to
achieve or maintain a specified level of sedation using the Ramsay Sedation
Scale score ≥ 2 (see Table 9). Patients were randomized to receive a
loading infusion of Precedex 1 mcg/kg or placebo (normal saline) given over 10
minutes and followed by a fixed maintenance infusion of 0.7 mcg/kg/hr. After
achieving the desired level of sedation, topicalization of the airway occurred.
Patients were allowed to receive rescue midazolam as needed to achieve and/or maintain
a Ramsay Sedation Scale ≥ 2. Demographic characteristics were similar
between the Precedex and comparator groups. For efficacy results see Table 13.
Table 13: Key Efficacy Results of Procedural Sedation
Studies
Study |
Loading Infusion Treatment Arm |
Number of Patients Enrolleda |
% Not Requiring Midazolam Rescue |
Confidenceb Interval on the Difference vs. Placebo |
Mean (SD) Total Dose (mg) of Rescue Midazolam Required |
Confidenceb Intervals of the Mean Rescue Dose |
Study 1 |
Dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg/kg |
134 |
40 |
37 (27, 48) |
1.4 (1.7) |
-2.7 (-3.4, -2.0) |
Dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg |
129 |
54 |
51 (40, 62) |
0.9 (1.5) |
-3.1 (-3.8, -2.5) |
placebo |
63 |
3 |
— |
4.1 (3.0) |
— |
Study 2 |
Dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/kg |
55 |
53 |
39 (20, 57) |
1.1 (1.5) |
-1.8 (-2.7, -0.9) |
placebo |
50 |
14 |
— |
2.9 (3.0) |
— |
aBased on ITT population defined as all randomized
and treated patients.
bNormal approximation to the binomial with continuity correction. |