CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism Of Action
Alirocumab is a human monoclonal antibody that binds to proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9). PCSK9 binds to the low-density lipoprotein receptors (LDLR) on the surface of hepatocytes to promote LDLR degradation within the liver. LDLR is the primary receptor that clears circulating LDL, therefore the decrease in LDLR levels by PCSK9 results in higher blood levels of LDL-C. By inhibiting the binding of PCSK9 to LDLR, alirocumab increases the number of LDLRs available to clear LDL, thereby lowering LDL-C levels.
Pharmacodynamics
Alirocumab reduced free PCSK9 in a concentration-dependent manner. Following a single subcutaneous administration of alirocumab 75 or 150 mg, maximal suppression of free PCSK9 occurred within 4 to 8 hours. Free PCSK9 concentrations returned to baseline when alirocumab concentrations decreased below the limit of quantitation.
Pharmacokinetics
Absorption
After subcutaneous (SC) administration of 75 mg to 300 mg alirocumab, median times to maximum serum concentrations (tmax) were 3-7 days. The pharmacokinetics of alirocumab after single SC administration of 75 mg into the abdomen, upper arm, or thigh were similar. The absolute bioavailability of alirocumab after SC administration was about 85% as determined by population pharmacokinetics analysis. A slightly greater than dose proportional increase was observed, with a 2.1-to 2.7-fold increase in total alirocumab concentrations for a 2-fold increase in dose from 75 mg every 2 weeks to 150 mg every 2 weeks. Monthly dose normalized exposure with 300 mg every 4 weeks treatment was similar to that of 150 mg every 2 weeks. Steady state was reached after 2 to 3 doses with an accumulation ratio up to a maximum of about 2-fold.
Distribution
Following IV administration, the volume of distribution was about 0.04 to 0.05 L/kg indicating that alirocumab is distributed primarily in the circulatory system.
Metabolism And Elimination
Specific metabolism studies were not conducted, because alirocumab is a protein. Alirocumab is expected to degrade to small peptides and individual amino acids. In clinical studies where alirocumab was administered in combination with atorvastatin or rosuvastatin, no relevant changes in statin concentrations were observed in the presence of repeated administration of alirocumab, indicating that cytochrome P450 enzymes (mainly CYP3A4 and CYP2C9) and transporter proteins such as P-gp and OATP were not affected by alirocumab.
Two elimination phases were observed for alirocumab. At low concentrations, the elimination is predominately through saturable binding to target (PCSK9), while at higher concentrations the elimination of alirocumab is largely through a non-saturable proteolytic pathway.
Based on a population pharmacokinetic analysis, the median apparent half-life of alirocumab at steady state was 17 to 20 days in patients receiving alirocumab at subcutaneous doses of 75 mg Q2W or 150 mg Q2W.
Specific Populations
A population pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted on data from 2799 subjects. Age, body weight, gender, race, and creatinine clearance were found not to significantly influence alirocumab pharmacokinetics. No dose adjustments are recommended for these demographics.
Pediatric
PRALUENT has not been studied in pediatric patients [see Use In Specific Populations].
Renal Impairment
Since monoclonal antibodies are not known to be eliminated via renal pathways, renal function is
not expected to impact the pharmacokinetics of alirocumab.
No data are available in patients with severe renal impairment.
Hepatic Impairment
Following administration of a single 75 mg SC dose, alirocumab pharmacokinetic profiles in
subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment were similar to those in subjects with
normal hepatic function.
No data are available in patients with severe hepatic impairment.
Drug-Drug Interactions
The median apparent half-life of alirocumab is reduced to 12 days when administered with a statin; however, this difference is not clinically meaningful and does not impact dosing recommendations.
Animal Toxicology And/Or Pharmacology
During a 13-week toxicology study of 75 mg/kg once weekly alirocumab in combination with 40 mg/kg once daily atorvastatin in adult monkeys, there were no effects of PRALUENT on the humoral immune response to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) after one to two months at exposures 100-fold greater than the exposure at the maximum recommended human dose of 150 mg every two weeks, based on AUC.
Clinical Studies
The efficacy of PRALUENT was investigated in five double-blind placebo-controlled trials that enrolled 3499 patients; 36% were patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) and 54% were non-FH patients who had clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Three of the five trials were conducted exclusively in patients with HeFH. All patients were receiving a maximally tolerated dose of a statin, with or without other lipid-modifying therapies. In the trials that enrolled patients with HeFH, the diagnosis of HeFH was made either by
genotyping or clinical criteria (“definite FH” using either the Simon Broome or WHO/Dutch
Lipid Network criteria). All trials were at least 52 weeks in duration with the primary efficacy endpoint measured at week 24 (mean percent change in LDL-C from baseline).
Three studies used an initial dose of 75 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) followed by criteria-based up-titration to 150 mg Q2W at week 12 for patients who did not achieve their pre-defined target LDL-C at week 8. The majority of patients (57% to 83%) who were treated for at least 12 weeks did not require up-titration. Two studies used only a 150 mg Q2W dose.
A sixth double-blind, placebo-controlled, 48-week trial enrolled 547 patients on maximally tolerated dose of statin who received PRALUENT 300 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W), 75 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) or placebo, with criteria-based adjustment to 150 mg Q2W in the PRALUENT arms at week 12. The primary efficacy endpoint was measured at week 24 (mean percent change in LDL-C from baseline).
Study 1 was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that randomly assigned 1553 patients to PRALUENT 150 mg Q2W and 788 patients to placebo. All patients were taking maximally tolerated doses of statins with or without other lipid-modifying therapy, and required additional LDL-C reduction. The mean age was 61 years (range 18-89), 38% were women, 93% were Caucasian, 3% were Black, and 5% were Hispanic/Latino. Overall, 69% were non-FH patients with clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and 18% had HeFH. The average LDL-C at baseline was 122 mg/dL.
The proportion of patients who prematurely discontinued study drug prior to the 24-week endpoint was 8% among those treated with PRALUENT and 8% among those treated with placebo.
At week 24, the treatment difference between PRALUENT and placebo in mean LDL-C percent change was -58% (95% CI: -61%, -56%; p-value: <0.0001).
For additional results see Table 2 and Figure 1.
Table 2 Mean Percent Change from Baseline and Differencea from Placebo in Lipid Parameters at Week 24 in Study 1b
Treatment Group |
LDL-C |
Total-C |
Non-HDL-C |
Apo B |
Week 24 (Mean Percent Change from Baseline) |
Placebo |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
PRALUENT (150 mg) |
-58 |
-36 |
-49 |
-50 |
Difference from placebo (LS Mean) (95% CI) |
-58 (-61, -56) |
-36 (-37, -34) |
-50 (-52, -47) |
-51 (-53, -48) |
a Difference is PRALUENT minus Placebo
b A pattern-mixture model approach was used with multiple imputation of missing post-treatment values based on a subject’s own baseline value and multiple imputation of missing on-treatment values based on a model including available on-treatment values. |
Figure 1: Mean Percent Change from Baseline in LDL-C Over 52 Weeks in Patients on Maximally Tolerated Statin Treated with PRALUENT 150 mg Q2W and Placebo Q2W (Study 1)a
a The means were estimated based on all randomized patients, with multiple imputation of missing data
taking into account treatment adherence.
b Number of patients with observed data.
Study 2 was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that randomly assigned 209 patients to PRALUENT and 107 patients to placebo. Patients were taking maximally tolerated doses of statins with or without other lipid-modifying therapy, and required additional LDL-C reduction.
The mean age was 63 years (range 39-87), 34% were women, 82% were Caucasian, 16% were Black, and 11% were Hispanic/Latino. Overall 84% had clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Mean baseline LDL-C was 102 mg/dL.
The proportion of patients who prematurely discontinued study drug prior to the 24-week endpoint was 11% among those treated with PRALUENT and 12% among those treated with placebo.
At week 12, the mean percent change from baseline in LDL-C was -45% with PRALUENT compared to 1% with placebo, and the treatment difference between PRALUENT 75mg Q2W and placebo in mean LDL-C percent change was -46% (95% CI: -53%, -39%).
At week 12, if additional LDL-C lowering was required based on pre-specified LDL-C criteria, PRALUENT was up-titrated to 150 mg Q2W for the remainder of the trial. The dose was up-titrated to 150 mg Q2W in 32 (17%) of 191 patients treated with PRALUENT for at least 12
weeks. At week 24, the mean percent change from baseline in LDL-C was -44% with PRALUENT and -2% with placebo, and the treatment difference between PRALUENT and placebo in mean LDL-C percent change was -43% (95% CI: -50%, -35%; p-value: <0.0001).
Studies 3 and 4 were multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials that, combined, randomly assigned 490 patients to PRALUENT and 245 patients to placebo. The trials were similar with regard to both design and eligibility criteria. All patients had HeFH, were taking a maximally tolerated dose of statin with or without other lipid-modifying therapy, and required additional LDL-C reduction. The mean age was 52 years (range 20-87), 45% were women, 94% were Caucasian, 1% were Black, and 3% were Hispanic/Latino. Overall, 45% of these patients with HeFH also had clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The average LDL-C at baseline was 141 mg/dL.
Considering both trials together, the proportion of patients who prematurely discontinued study drug prior to the 24-week endpoint was 6% among those treated with PRALUENT and 4% among those treated with placebo.
At week 12, the treatment difference between PRALUENT 75 mg Q2W and placebo in mean LDL-C percent change was -48% (95% CI: -52%, -44%).
At week 12, if additional LDL-C lowering was required based on pre-specified LDL-C criteria, PRALUENT was up-titrated to 150 mg Q2W for the remainder of the trials. The dose was up-titrated to 150 mg Q2W in 196 (42%) of 469 patients treated with PRALUENT for at least 12 weeks. At week 24, the mean treatment difference between PRALUENT and placebo in mean LDL-C percent change from baseline was -54% (95% CI: -59%, -50%; p-value: <0.0001). The LDL-C-lowering effect was sustained to week 52.
For additional results see Table 3 and Figure 2.
Table 3 Mean Percent Change from Baseline and Differencea from Placebo in Lipid Parameters at Week 12 and Week 24 in Patients with HeFH (Studies 3 and 4 Pooled)b
Treatment Group |
LDL-C |
Total-C |
Non-HDL-C |
Apo B |
Week 12 (Mean Percent Change from Baseline) |
Placebo |
5 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
PRALUENT (75 mg) |
-43 |
-27 |
-38 |
-34 |
Difference from placebo (LS Mean) (95% CI) |
-48 (-52, -44) |
-31 (-34, -28) |
-42 (-46, -39) |
-36 (-39, -33) |
Week 24 (Mean Percent Change from Baseline) |
Placebo |
7 |
5 |
7 |
2 |
PRALUENT (75/up150 mgc) |
-47 |
-30 |
-42 |
-40 |
Difference from placebo (LS Mean) (95% CI) |
-54 (-59, -50) |
-36 (-39, -33) |
-49 (-53, -45) |
-42 (-45, -39) |
a Difference is PRALUENT minus Placebo
b A pattern-mixture model approach was used with multiple imputation of missing post-treatment values based on a subject’s own baseline value and multiple imputation of missing on-treatment values based on a model including available on-treatment values.
c Dose was up-titrated to 150 mg Q2W in 196 (42%) patients treated for at least 12 weeks |
Figure 2: Mean Percent Change from Baseline in LDL-C Over 52 Weeks in Patients with HeFH on Maximally-Tolerated Statin Treated with PRALUENT 75/150 mg Q2W and Placebo Q2W (Studies 3 and 4 Pooled)a
a The means were estimated based on all randomized patients, with multiple imputation of missing data
taking into account treatment adherence.
b Number of patients with observed data.
Study 5 was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that randomly assigned 72 patients to PRALUENT 150 mg Q2W and 35 patients to placebo. Patients had HeFH with a baseline LDL-C ≥160 mg/dL while taking a maximally tolerated dose of statin with or without other lipid-modifying therapy. The mean age was 51 years (range 18-80), 47% were women, 88% were Caucasian, 2% were Black, and 6% were Hispanic/Latino. Overall, 50% had clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The average LDL-C at baseline was 198 mg/dL.
The proportion of patients who discontinued study drug prior to the 24-week endpoint was 10% among those treated with PRALUENT and 0% among those treated with placebo.
At week 24, the mean percent change from baseline in LDL-C was -43% with PRALUENT and -7% with placebo, and the treatment difference between PRALUENT and placebo in mean LDL-C percent change was -36% (95% CI: -49%, -24%; p-value: <0.0001).
Study 6 was a multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that randomly assigned 312 patients to PRALUENT 300 mg Q4W, 78 patients to PRALUENT 75 mg Q2W, and 157 patients to placebo who had hypercholesterolemia and were taking concomitant statin.
The mean age was 62 years (range 21-88), 37% were women, 88% were Caucasian, 10% were Black, and 2% were Hispanic/Latino. Of these, 64% of patients had clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and 8% had HeFH. The mean LDL-C at baseline was 113 mg/dL.
The proportion of patients who discontinued study drug prior to the 24-week endpoint was 9% among those treated with PRALUENT 300 mg Q4W, 13% among those treated with PRALUENT 75 mg Q2W and 13% among those treated with placebo.
At week 12, the treatment difference between PRALUENT 300 mg Q4W and placebo in mean percent change in LDL-C from baseline was -54% (97.5% CI: -61%, -48%), and the treatment difference between PRALUENT 75 mg Q2W and placebo in mean percent change in LDL-C was -44% (97.5% CI: -53%, -35% (Figure 3).
Figure 3: Mean Percent Change from Baseline in LDL-C up to Week 12 in Patients on Concomitant Statin Treated with PRALUENT 75 mg Q2W, PRALUENT 300 mg Q4W mg or Placeboa
a The means were estimated based on all randomized patients, with multiple imputation of missing data taking into account treatment adherence.
At week 12, if additional LDL-C lowering was required based on pre-specified LDL-C criteria, PRALUENT was adjusted to 150 mg Q2W for the remainder of the trial. The dose was adjusted to 150 mg Q2W in approximately 20% of patients treated with PRALUENT 75 mg Q2W or 300 mg Q4W for at least 12 weeks. At week 24, the treatment difference between initial assignment to PRALUENT 300 mg Q4W and placebo in mean percent change in LDL-C from baseline was -56% (97.5% CI: -62%, -49%; p-value: <0.0001), and the treatment difference between initial assignment to PRALUENT 75 mg Q2W and placebo in mean percent change in LDL-C from baseline was -48% (97.5% CI: -57%, -39%).