CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism Of Action
Dabigatran and its acyl
glucuronides are competitive, direct thrombin inhibitors. Because thrombin
(serine protease) enables the conversion of fibrinogen into fibrin during the
coagulation cascade, its inhibition prevents the development of a thrombus.
Both free and clot-bound thrombin, and thrombin-induced platelet aggregation
are inhibited by the active moieties.
Pharmacodynamics
At recommended therapeutic
doses, dabigatran etexilate prolongs the coagulation markers such as aPTT, ECT,
and TT. INR is relatively insensitive to the exposure to dabigatran and cannot
be interpreted the same way as used for warfarin monitoring.
The aPTT test provides an
approximation of PRADAXA’s anticoagulant effect. The average time course for
effects on aPTT, following approved dosing regimens in patients with various
degrees of renal impairment is shown in Figure 2. The curves represent mean
levels without confidence intervals; variations should be expected when
measuring aPTT. While advice cannot be provided on the level of recovery of
aPTT needed in any particular clinical setting, the curves can be used to
estimate the time to get to a particular level of recovery, even when
the time since the last dose of PRADAXA is not precisely known. In the RE-LY
trial, the median (10th to 90th percentile) trough aPTT in patients receiving
the 150 mg dose was 52 (40 to 76) seconds.
Figure 2 : Average Time Course for Effects of
Dabigatran on aPTT, Following Approved PRADAXA Dosing Regimens in Patients with
Various Degrees of Renal Impairment*
*Simulations based on PK data
from a study in subjects with renal impairment and PK/aPTT relationships
derived from the RE-LY study; aPTT prolongation in RE-LY was measured centrally
in citrate plasma using PTT Reagent Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany.
There may be quantitative differences between various established methods for
aPTT assessment.
The degree of anticoagulant activity can also be assessed
by the ecarin clotting time (ECT). This test is a more specific measure of the
effect of dabigatran than activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). In the
RE-LY trial, the median (10th to 90th percentile) trough ECT in patients
receiving the 150 mg dose was 63 (44 to 103) seconds.
In orthopedic hip surgery
patients, maximum aPTT response (Emax) to dabigatran and baseline aPTT were
higher shortly after surgery than at later time points (e.g. ≥3 days
after surgery).
Cardiac Electrophysiology
No prolongation of the QTc
interval was observed with dabigatran etexilate at doses up to 600 mg.
Pharmacokinetics
Dabigatran etexilate mesylate
is absorbed as the dabigatran etexilate ester. The ester is then hydrolyzed,
forming dabigatran, the active moiety. Dabigatran is metabolized to four
different acyl glucuronides and both the glucuronides and dabigatran have
similar pharmacological activity. Pharmacokinetics described here refer to the
sum of dabigatran and its glucuronides. Dabigatran displays dose-proportional
pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects and patients in the range of doses from 10
to 400 mg.
Absorption
The absolute bioavailability of
dabigatran following oral administration of dabigatran etexilate is
approximately 3 to 7%. Dabigatran etexilate is a substrate of the efflux
transporter P-gp. After oral administration of dabigatran etexilate in healthy
volunteers, Cmax occurs at 1 hour post-administration in the fasted state.
Coadministration of PRADAXA with a high-fat meal delays the time to Cmax by
approximately 2 hours but has no effect on the bioavailability of dabigatran;
PRADAXA may be administered with or without food.
The oral bioavailability of
dabigatran etexilate increases by 75% when the pellets are taken without the
capsule shell compared to the intact capsule formulation. PRADAXA capsules
should therefore not be broken, chewed, or opened before administration.
Distribution
Dabigatran is approximately 35%
bound to human plasma proteins. The red blood cell to plasma partitioning of
dabigatran measured as total radioactivity is less than 0.3. The volume of
distribution of dabigatran is 50 to 70 L. Dabigatran pharmacokinetics are dose
proportional after single doses of 10 to 400 mg. Given twice daily,
dabigatran’s accumulation factor is approximately two.
Elimination
Dabigatran is eliminated
primarily in the urine. Renal clearance of dabigatran is 80% of total clearance
after intravenous administration. After oral administration of radiolabeled
dabigatran, 7% of radioactivity is recovered in urine and 86% in feces. The
half-life of dabigatran in healthy subjects is 12 to 17 hours.
Metabolism
After oral administration,
dabigatran etexilate is converted to dabigatran. The cleavage of the dabigatran
etexilate by esterase-catalyzed hydrolysis to the active principal dabigatran
is the predominant metabolic reaction. Dabigatran is not a substrate,
inhibitor, or inducer of CYP450 enzymes. Dabigatran is subject to conjugation
forming pharmacologically active acyl glucuronides. Four positional isomers,
1-O, 2-O, 3-O, and 4-O-acylglucuronide exist, and each accounts for less than
10% of total dabigatran in plasma.
Renal Impairment
An open, parallel-group
single-center study compared dabigatran pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects
and patients with mild to moderate renal impairment receiving a single dose of
PRADAXA 150 mg. Exposure to dabigatran increases with severity of renal
function impairment (Table 8). Similar findings were observed in the RELY,
RE-COVER and RE-NOVATE II trials.
Table 8 : Impact of Renal Impairment on Dabigatran
Pharmacokinetics
Renal Function |
CrCl (mL/min) |
Increase in AUC |
Increase in Cmax |
t½ (h) |
Normal |
≥ 80 |
1x |
1x |
13 |
Mild |
50-80 |
1.5x |
1.1x |
15 |
Moderate |
30-50 |
3.2x |
1.7x |
18 |
Severe+ |
15-30 |
6.3x |
2.1x |
27 |
+Patients with severe renal impairment were not studied
in RE-LY, RE-COVER and RE-NOVATE II. Dosing recommendations in subjects with
severe renal impairment are based on pharmacokinetic modeling [see DOSAGE
AND ADMINISTRATION and Use In Specific Populations]. |
Hepatic Impairment
Administration of PRADAXA in
patients with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh B) showed a large
inter-subject variability, but no evidence of a consistent change in exposure
or pharmacodynamics.
Drug Interactions
A summary of the effect of
coadministered drugs on dabigatran exposure is shown in Figures 3.1 and 3.2.
In the orthopedic hip surgery
patients, limited clinical data with P-gp inhibitors is available.
Figure 3.1: Effect of P-gp
Inhibitor or Inducer (rifampicin) Drugs on Peak and Total Exposure to
Dabigatran (Cmax and AUC). Shown are the Geometric Mean Ratios (Ratio) and 90%
Confidence Interval (90% CI). The Perpetrator and Dabigatran Etexilate Dose and
Dosing Frequency are given as well as the Time of Perpetrator Dosing in
Relation to Dabigatran Etexilate Dose (Time Difference)
Figure 3.2: Effect of
Non-P-gp Inhibitor or Inducer, Other Drugs, on Peak and Total Exposure to
Dabigatran (Cmax and AUC). Shown are the Geometric Mean Ratios (Ratio) and 90%
Confidence Interval (90% CI). The Perpetrator and Dabigatran Etexilate Dose and
Dosing Frequency are given as well as the Time of Perpetrator Dosing in
Relation to Dabigatran Etexilate Dose (Time Difference)
In RE-LY, dabigatran plasma
samples were also collected. The concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors, H2
antagonists, and digoxin did not appreciably change the trough concentration of
dabigatran.
Impact Of Dabigatran On Other
Drugs
In clinical studies exploring
CYP3A4, CYP2C9, P-gp and other pathways, dabigatran did not meaningfully alter
the pharmacokinetics of amiodarone, atorvastatin, clarithromycin, diclofenac,
clopidogrel, digoxin, pantoprazole, or ranitidine.
Clinical Studies
Reduction Of Risk Of Stroke And Systemic Embolism In Non-valvular
Atrial Fibrillation
The clinical evidence for the efficacy of PRADAXA was
derived from RE-LY (Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulant Therapy),
a multi-center, multinational, randomized parallel group trial comparing two
blinded doses of PRADAXA (110 mg twice daily and 150 mg twice daily) with
open-label warfarin (dosed to target INR of 2 to 3) in patients with
non-valvular, persistent, paroxysmal, or permanent atrial fibrillation and one
or more of the following additional risk factors:
- Previous stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), or
systemic embolism
- Left ventricular ejection fraction <40%
- Symptomatic heart failure, ≥ New York Heart
Association Class 2
- Age ≥75 years
- Age ≥65 years and one of the following: diabetes
mellitus, coronary artery disease (CAD), or hypertension
The primary objective of this study was to determine if
PRADAXA was non-inferior to warfarin in reducing the occurrence of the
composite endpoint, stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic) and systemic embolism.
The study was designed to ensure that PRADAXA preserved more than 50% of
warfarin’s effect as established by previous randomized, placebo-controlled
trials of warfarin in atrial fibrillation. Statistical superiority was also
analyzed.
A total of 18,113 patients were randomized and followed
for a median of 2 years. The patients’ mean age was 71.5 years and the mean
CHADS2 score was 2.1. The patient population was 64% male, 70% Caucasian, 16%
Asian, and 1% black. Twenty percent of patients had a history of a stroke or
TIA and 50% were Vitamin K antagonist (VKA) naïve, defined as less than 2
months total lifetime exposure to a VKA. Thirty-two percent of the population
had never been exposed to a VKA. Concomitant diseases of patients in this trial
included hypertension 79%, diabetes 23%, and CAD 28%. At baseline, 40% of
patients were on aspirin and 6% were on clopidogrel. For patients randomized to
warfarin, the mean percentage of time in therapeutic range (INR 2 to 3) was
64%.
Relative to warfarin and to PRADAXA 110 mg twice daily,
PRADAXA 150 mg twice daily significantly reduced the primary composite endpoint
of stroke and systemic embolism (see Table 9 and Figure 4).
Table 9 : First Occurrence of Stroke or Systemic
Embolism in the RE-LY Study*
|
PRADAXA 150 mg twice daily |
PRADAXA 110 mg twice daily |
Warfarin |
Patients randomized |
6076 |
6015 |
6022 |
Patients (% per yr) with events |
135 (1.12%) |
183 (1.54%) |
203 (1.72%) |
Hazard ratio vs. warfarin (95% CI) |
0.65 (0.52, 0.81) |
0.89 (0.73, 1.09) |
|
P-value for superiority |
0.0001 |
0.27 |
|
Hazard ratio vs. PRADAXA 110 mg (95% CI) |
0.72 (0.58, 0.91) |
|
|
P-value for superiority |
0.005 |
|
|
* Randomized ITT |
Figure 4 : Kaplan-Meier Curve Estimate of Time to First Stroke or Systemic Embolism
The contributions of the
components of the composite endpoint, including stroke by subtype, are shown in
Table 10. The treatment effect was primarily a reduction in stroke. PRADAXA 150
mg twice daily was superior in reducing ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes
relative to warfarin.
Table 10 : Strokes and Systemic Embolism in the RE-LY Study
|
PRADAXA 150 mg twice daily |
Warfarin |
Hazard ratio vs. warfarin (95% CI) |
Patients randomized |
6076 |
6022 |
|
Stroke |
123 |
187 |
0.64 (0.51, 0.81) |
Ischemic stroke |
104 |
134 |
0.76 (0.59, 0.98) |
Hemorrhagic stroke |
12 |
45 |
0.26 (0.14, 0.49) |
Systemic embolism |
13 |
21 |
0.61 (0.30, 1.21) |
In the RE-LY trial, the rate of
all-cause mortality was lower on dabigatran 150 mg than on warfarin (3.6% per
year versus 4.1% per year). The rate of vascular death was lower on dabigatran
150 mg compared to warfarin (2.3% per year versus 2.7% per year). Non-vascular
death rates were similar in the treatment arms.
The efficacy of PRADAXA 150 mg
twice daily was generally consistent across major subgroups (see Figure 5).
Figure 5 : Stroke and Systemic Embolism Hazard Ratios
by Baseline Characteristics*
* Randomized ITT
Note: The figure above presents
effects in various subgroups all of which are baseline characteristics and all
of which were pre-specified. The 95% confidence limits that are shown do not
take into account how many comparisons were made, nor do they reflect the
effect of a particular factor after adjustment for all other factors. Apparent
homogeneity or heterogeneity among groups should not be over-interpreted.
In RE-LY, a higher rate of
clinical myocardial infarction was reported in patients who received PRADAXA
(0.7 per 100 patient-years for 150 mg dose) than in those who received warfarin
(0.6).
Treatment And Reduction In The Risk
Of Recurrence Of Deep Venous Thrombosis And Pulmonary Embolism
In the randomized, parallel
group, double-blind trials, RE-COVER and RE-COVER II, patients with deep vein
thrombosis and pulmonary embolism received PRADAXA 150 mg twice daily or
warfarin (dosed to target INR of 2 to 3) following initial treatment with an
approved parenteral anticoagulant for 5-10 days.
In RE-COVER, the median
treatment duration during the oral only treatment period was 174 days. A total
of 2539 patients (30.9% patients with symptomatic PE with or without DVT and
68.9% with symptomatic DVT only) were treated with a mean age of 54.7 years. The
patient population was 58.4% male, 94.8% white, 2.6% Asian, and 2.6% black. The
concomitant diseases of patients in this trial included hypertension (35.9%),
diabetes mellitus (8.3%), coronary artery disease (6.5%), active cancer (4.8%),
and gastric or duodenal ulcer (4.4%). Concomitant medications included agents
acting on renin-angiotensin system (25.2%), vasodilators (28.4%), serum
lipid-reducing agents (18.2%), NSAIDs (21%), beta-blockers (14.8%), calcium
channel blockers (8.5%), ASA (8.6%), and platelet inhibitors excluding ASA
(0.6%). Patients randomized to warfarin had a mean percentage of time in the
INR target range of 2.0 to 3.0 of 60% in RE-COVER study.
In RE-COVER II, the median
treatment duration during the oral only treatment period was 174 days. A total
of 2568 patients (31.8% patients with symptomatic PE with or without DVT and
68.1% with symptomatic DVT only) were treated with a mean age of 54.9 years.
The patient population was 60.6% male, 77.6% white, 20.9% Asian, and 1.5%
black. The concomitant diseases of patients in this trial included hypertension
(35.1%), diabetes mellitus (9.8%), coronary artery disease (7.1%), active
cancer (3.9%), and gastric or duodenal ulcer (3.8%). Concomitant medications
included agents acting on renin-angiotensin system (24.2%), vasodilators
(28.6%), serum lipid-reducing agents (20.0%), NSAIDs (22.3%), beta-blockers
(14.8%), calcium channel blockers (10.8%), ASA (9.8%), and platelet inhibitors
excluding ASA (0.8%). Patients randomized to warfarin had a mean percentage of
time in the INR target range of 2.0 to 3.0 of 57% in RE-COVER II study.
In studies RE-COVER and RE-COVER II, the protocol
specified non-inferiority margin (2.75) for the hazard ratio was derived based
on the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of the historical warfarin
effect. PRADAXA was demonstrated to be non-inferior to warfarin (dosed to
target INR of 2 to 3) (Table 11) based on the primary composite endpoint (fatal
PE or symptomatic non-fatal PE and/or DVT) and retains at least 66.9%
(RE-COVER) and 63.9% (RE-COVER II) of the historical warfarin effect,
respectively.
Table 11 : Primary Efficacy Endpoint for RE-COVER and
RE-COVER II – Modified ITTa Population
RE-COVER |
PRADAXA 150 mg twice daily N (%)
N=1274 |
Warfarin N (%)
N=1265 |
Hazard ratio vs. warfarin (95% CI) |
Primary Composite Endpointb |
34 (2.7) |
32 (2.5) |
1.05 (0.65, 1.70) |
Fatal PEc |
1 (0.1) |
3 (0.2) |
|
Symptomatic non-fatal PEc |
16 (1.3) |
8 (0.6) |
|
Symptomatic recurrent DVTc |
17 (1.3) |
23 (1.8) |
|
RE-COVER II |
N=1279 |
N=1289 |
|
Primary Composite Endpointb |
34 (2.7) |
30 (2.3) |
1.13 (0.69, 1.85) |
Fatal PEc |
3 (0.2) |
0 |
|
Symptomatic non-fatal PEc |
9 (0.7) |
15 (1.2) |
|
Symptomatic recurrent DVTc |
30 (2.3) |
17 (1.3) |
|
aModified ITT analyses population consists of
all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study medication.
bNumber of patients with one or more event.
cNumber of events. For patients with multiple events each event is
counted independently. |
In the randomized, parallel
group, double-blind, pivotal trial, RE-MEDY, patients received PRADAXA 150 mg
twice daily or warfarin (dosed to target INR of 2 to 3) following 3 to 12
months of treatment with anticoagulation therapy for an acute VTE. The median
treatment duration during the treatment period was 534 days. A total of 2856
patients were treated with a mean age of 54.6 years. The patient population was
61% male, and 90.1% white, 7.9% Asian and 2.0% black. The concomitant diseases
of patients in this trial included hypertension (38.6%), diabetes mellitus
(9.0%), coronary artery disease (7.2%), active cancer (4.2%), and gastric or
duodenal ulcer (3.8%). Concomitant medications included agents acting on
renin-angiotensin system (27.9%), vasodilators (26.7%), serum lipid reducing
agents (20.6%), NSAIDs (18.3%), beta-blockers (16.3%), calcium channel blockers
(11.1%), aspirin (7.7%), and platelet inhibitors excluding ASA (0.9%). Patients
randomized to warfarin had a mean percentage of time in the INR target range of
2.0 to 3.0 of 62% in the study.
In study RE-MEDY, the protocol specified non-inferiority
margin (2.85) for the hazard ratio was derived based on the point estimate of
the historical warfarin effect. PRADAXA was demonstrated to be non-inferior to
warfarin (dosed to target INR of 2 to 3) (Table 12) based on the primary
composite endpoint (fatal PE or symptomatic non-fatal PE and/or DVT) and
retains at least 63.0% of the historical warfarin effect. If the
non-inferiority margin was derived based on the 50% retention of the upper
limit of the 95% confidence interval, PRADAXA was demonstrated to retain at
least 33.4% of the historical warfarin effect based on the composite primary
endpoint.
Table 12 : Primary Efficacy Endpoint for RE-MEDY –
Modified ITTa Population
|
PRADAXA 150 mg twice daily
N=1430 N (%) |
Warfarin
N=1426 N (%) |
Hazard ratio vs. warfarin (95% CI) |
Primary Composite Endpointb |
26 (1.8) |
18 (1.3) |
1.44 (0.78, 2.64) |
Fatal PEc |
1 (0.07) |
1 (0.07) |
|
Symptomatic non-fatal PEc |
10 (0.7) |
5 (0.4) |
|
Symptomatic recurrent DVTc |
17 (1.2) |
13 (0.9) |
|
aModified ITT analyses population consists of
all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study medication.
bNumber of patients with one or more event.
cNumber of events. For patients with multiple events each event is
counted independently. |
In a randomized, parallel
group, double-blind, pivotal trial, RE-SONATE, patients received PRADAXA 150 mg
twice daily or placebo following 6 to 18 months of treatment with
anticoagulation therapy for an acute VTE. The median treatment duration was 182
days. A total of 1343 patients were treated with a mean age of 55.8 years. The
patient population was 55.5% male, 89.0% white, 9.3% Asian, and 1.7% black. The
concomitant diseases of patients in this trial included hypertension (38.8%),
diabetes mellitus (8.0%), coronary artery disease (6.0%), history of cancer
(6.0%), gastric or duodenal ulcer (4.5%), and heart failure (4.6%). Concomitant
medications included agents acting on renin-angiotensin system (28.7%),
vasodilators (19.4%), beta-blockers (18.5%), serum lipid reducing agents
(17.9%), NSAIDs (12.1%), calcium channel blockers (8.9%), aspirin (8.3%), and
platelet inhibitors excluding ASA (0.7%). Based on the outcome of the primary
composite endpoint (fatal PE, unexplained death, or symptomatic non-fatal PE
and/or DVT), PRADAXA was superior to placebo (Table 13).
Table 13 : Primary Efficacy Endpoint for RE-SONATE –
Modified ITTa Population
|
PRADAXA 150 mg twice daily
N=681 N (%) |
Placebo
N=662 N (%) |
Hazard ratio vs. placebo (95% CI) |
Primary Composite Endpointb |
3 (0.4) |
37 (5.6) |
0.08 (0.02, 0.25) p-value <0.0001 |
Fatal PE and unexplained deathc |
0 |
2 (0.3) |
|
Symptomatic non-fatal PEc |
1 (0.1) |
14 (2.1) |
|
Symptomatic recurrent DVTc |
2 (0.3) |
23 (3.5) |
|
aModified ITT analyses population consists of
all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study medication.
bNumber of patients with one or more events.
cNumber of events. For patients with multiple events each event is
counted independently. |
Prophylaxis Of Deep Vein
Thrombosis And Pulmonary Embolism Following Hip Replacement Surgery
In the randomized, parallel
group, double-blind, non-inferiority trials, RE-NOVATE and RE-NOVATE II
patients received PRADAXA 75 mg orally 1-4 hours after surgery followed by 150
mg daily (RE-NOVATE), PRADAXA 110 mg orally 1-4 hours after surgery followed by
220 mg daily (RE-NOVATE and RE-NOVATE II) or subcutaneous enoxaparin 40 mg once
daily initiated the evening before surgery (RE-NOVATE and RE-NOVATE II) for the
prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in patients who have
undergone hip replacement surgery.
Overall, in RE-NOVATE and
RE-NOVATE II, the median treatment duration was 33 days for PRADAXA and 33 days
for enoxaparin. A total of 5428 patients were treated with a mean age of 63.2
years. The patient population was 45.3% male, 96.1% white, 3.6% Asian, and 0.4
% black. The concomitant diseases of patients in these trials included
hypertension (46.1%), venous insufficiency (15.4%), coronary artery disease
(8.2%), diabetes mellitus (7.9%), reduced renal function (5.3%), heart failure
(3.4%), gastric or duodenal ulcer (3.0%), VTE (2.7%), and malignancy (0.1%).
Concomitant medications included cardiac therapy (69.7%), NSAIDs (68%),
vasoprotectives (29.7%), agents acting on renin-angiotensin system (29.1%),
beta-blockers (21.5%), diuretics (20.8%), lipid modifying agents (18.2%), any
antithrombin/anticoagulant (16.0%), calcium channel blockers (13.6%), low
molecular weight heparin (7.8%), aspirin (7.0%), platelet inhibitors excluding
ASA (6.9%), other antihypertensives (6.7%), and peripheral vasodilators (2.6%).
For efficacy evaluation all
patients were to have bilateral venography of the lower extremities at 3 days
after last dose of study drug unless an endpoint event had occurred earlier in
the study. In the primary efficacy analysis, PRADAXA 110 mg orally 1-4 hours
after surgery followed by 220 mg daily was non-inferior to enoxaparin 40 mg
once daily in a composite endpoint of confirmed VTE (proximal or distal DVT on
venogram, confirmed symptomatic DVT, or confirmed PE) and all cause death
during the treatment period (Tables 14 and 15). In the studies 2628 (76.5%)
patients in RE-NOVATE and 1572 (78.9%) patients in RE-NOVATE II had evaluable
venograms at study completion.
Table 14 : Primary Efficacy Endpoint for RE-NOVATE
|
PRADAXA 220 mg
N (%) |
Enoxaparin
N (%) |
Number of Patientsa |
N=880 |
N= 897 |
Primary Composite Endpoint |
53 (6.0) |
60 (6.7) |
Risk difference (%) vs. enoxaparin (95% CI) |
-0.7 (-2.9, 1.6) |
|
Number of Patients |
N=909 |
N=917 |
Composite endpoint of major VTEb and VTE related mortality |
28 (3.1) |
36 (3.9) |
Number of Patients |
N=905 |
N=914 |
Proximal DVT |
23 (2.5) |
33 (3.6) |
Number of Patients |
N=874 |
N=894 |
Total DVT |
46 (5.3) |
57 (6.4) |
Number of Patients |
N=1137 |
N=1142 |
Symptomatic DVT |
6 (0.5) |
1 (0.1) |
PE |
5 (0.4) |
3 (0.3) |
Death |
3 (0.3) |
0 |
aFull Analysis Set (FAS): The FAS included all
randomized patients who received at least one subcutaneous injection or one
oral dose of study medication, underwent surgery and subjects for whom the
presence or absence of an efficacy outcome at the end of the study was known,
i.e., an evaluable negative venogram for both distal and proximal DVT in both
legs or any of the following: positive venography in one or both legs, or
confirmed symptomatic DVT, PE, or death during the treatment period.
bVTE is defined as proximal DVT and PE |
Table 15 : Primary Efficacy Endpoint for RE-NOVATE II
|
PRADAXA 220 mg
N (%) |
Enoxaparin
N (%) |
Number of Patientsa |
N=792 |
N= 786 |
Primary Composite Endpoint |
61 (7.7) |
69 (8.8) |
Risk difference (%) vs. enoxaparin (95% CI) |
-1.1 (-3.8, 1.6) |
|
Number of Patients |
N=805 |
N=795 |
Composite endpoint of major VTEb and VTE related mortality |
18 (2.2) |
33 (4.2) |
Number of Patients |
N=804 |
N=793 |
Proximal DVT |
17 (2.1) |
31 (3.9) |
Number of Patients |
N=791 |
N=784 |
Total DVT |
60 (7.6) |
67 (8.5) |
Number of Patients |
N=1001 |
N=992 |
Symptomatic DVT |
0 |
4(0.4) |
PE |
1 (0.1) |
2(0.2) |
Death |
0 |
1 (0.1) |
aFull Analysis Set (FAS): The FAS included all
randomized patients who received at least one subcutaneous injection or one
oral dose of study medication, underwent surgery and subjects for whom the
presence or absence of an efficacy outcome at the end of the study was known,
i.e., an evaluable negative venogram for both distal and proximal DVT in both
legs or any of the following: positive venography in one or both legs, or
confirmed symptomatic DVT, PE, or death during the treatment period.
bVTE is defined as proximal DVT and PE |