WARNINGS
Included as part of the "PRECAUTIONS" Section
PRECAUTIONS
Potential For Microbial Overgrowth
OTIPRIO may result in overgrowth of non-susceptible bacteria and fungi. If such infections occur, institute alternative therapy.
Nonclinical Toxicology
Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment Of Fertility
Eight in vitro mutagenicity tests have been conducted with ciprofloxacin, and the test results are listed below:
Salmonella/Microsome Test (Negative)
Escherichia coli DNA Repair Assay (Negative)
Mouse Lymphoma Cell Forward Mutation Assay (Positive)
Chinese Hamster V79 Cell HGPRT Test (Negative)
Syrian Hamster Embryo Cell Transformation Assay (Negative)
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Point Mutation Assay (Negative)
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mitotic Crossover and Gene Conversion Assay (Negative)
Rat Hepatocyte DNA Repair Assay (Positive)
Thus, 2 of the 8 in vitro tests were positive, but results of the following 3 in vivo test systems gave negative results:
Rat Hepatocyte DNA Repair Assay
Micronucleus Test (Mice)
Dominant Lethal Test (Mice)
Long-term carcinogenicity studies in mice and rats have been completed for ciprofloxacin. After daily oral doses of 750 mg/kg in mice and 250 mg/kg in rats (for mice and rats respectively, approximately 300 and 200 times the maximum recommended clinical dose of ototopical ciprofloxacin based upon body surface area, assuming total absorption of ciprofloxacin from the ear of a patient treated with OTIPRIO) were administered for up to 2 years, there was no evidence that ciprofloxacin had any carcinogenic or tumorigenic effects in these species.
Fertility studies performed in rats at oral doses of ciprofloxacin up to 100 mg/kg/day revealed no evidence of impairment. This would be approximately 80 times the maximum recommended clinical dose of ototopical ciprofloxacin based upon body surface area, assuming total absorption of ciprofloxacin from the ear of a patient treated with OTIPRIO.
Use In Specific Populations
Pregnancy
Risk Summary
Animal reproduction studies have not been conducted with OTIPRIO. No adequate and well-controlled studies have been performed in pregnant women. Because of the negligible systemic exposure associated with clinical administration of OTIPRIO, this product is expected to be of minimal risk for maternal and fetal toxicity when administered to pregnant women.
Lactation
Risk Summary
Ciprofloxacin is excreted in human milk with systemic administration. However, because of the negligible systemic exposure after otic application, nursing infants of mothers receiving OTIPRIO should not be affected.
Pediatric Use
The safety and effectiveness of OTIPRIO for the treatment of pediatric patients (6 months of age and older) with bilateral otitis media with effusion undergoing tympanostomy tube placement was established in 530 patients who participated in the Phase 3 trials. The median age of patients enrolled in the clinical trials was 1.5 years; 62% of patients were 6 months through 2 years of
age and 38% of patients were greater than 2 years of age [see ADVERSE REACTIONS and Clinical Studies].
The safety and effectiveness of OTIPRIO for the treatment of acute otitis externa was established in 67 pediatric patients (3 through 17 years of age) who participated in the Phase 3 trial; 57% of patients were 3 through 11 years of age and 43% of patients were 12 through 17 years of age. The safety and efficacy observed in the pediatric patients was no different from the older population. OTIPRIO is indicated for the treatment of acute otitis externa in pediatric patients 6 months of age and older [see INDICATIONS, DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION, ADVERSE REACTIONS and Clinical Studies].
The safety and effectiveness of OTIPRIO in infants below 6 months of age have not been established for the treatment of pediatric patients with bilateral otitis media with effusion undergoing tympanostomy tube placement and acute otitis externa.
Geriatric Use
Clinical studies of OTIPRIO did not include sufficient numbers of patients aged 65 and over to determine whether they respond differently from younger patients. Other reported clinical experience has not identified differences in responses between the elderly and younger patients [see ADVERSE REACTIONS and Clinical Studies].