Clinical Pharmacology for Orthovisc
Clinical Studies
The effectiveness of ORTHOVISC® for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee was evaluated in three main studies; two randomized, controlled, double-blind multicenter studies (OAK9501 and OAK2001) that involved unilateral treatment, and one study (OAK9801) that involved bilateral treatment. Because bilateral treatment confounded the assessment of effectiveness of the OAK9801 study, the effectiveness data are summarized for the OAK9501 and OAK2001 studies. Safety data for all three studies are reported in “Adverse Events.”
Study Design/Analysis
The objective of the randomized studies was to assess the effectiveness of ORTHOVISC® for the treatment of joint pain of patients with idiopathic osteoarthritis of the knee. The OAK9501 study randomized patients to 3 weekly injections of either ORTHOVISC® (O3) or saline. The OAK2001 study randomized patients to one of three treatments: 4 ORTHOVISC® injections (O4), 3 ORTHOVISC® injections + 1 arthrocentesis (O3A1) procedure, or 4 arthrocentesis (A4) procedures. Follow-up occurred at weeks 7/8, 11/12, 15/16 and 21/22, with final follow-up at week 27/28. When each study was analyzed individually, the primary analyses for each study did not show statistical significance. A combined analysis was additionally performed. The combined data consisted of data obtained from a subgroup of patients from each of the studies (the “ITT Subgroup” from OAK9501 and the “Evaluable Subgroup” from OAK2001) who had Kellgren-Lawrence radiographic grades of II or III at baseline and WOMAC pain in the contralateral knee of <175mm (out of 500) and is referred to as the effectiveness subgroup population. For the effectiveness subgroup population, the primary effectiveness analysis performed was to determine the proportion of patients achieving a 20% improvement from baseline in the WOMAC Pain Score in conjunction with a minimum absolute improvement of 50 mm from baseline in the WOMAC Pain Score, and a 40% and 50% improvement from baseline in WOMAC Pain Score at four assessment points between Weeks 7/8 to 21/22 for the index knee.
Study Population
OAK9501 included 226 patients at 10 centers, and OAK2001 involved 373 patients at 24 centers. Within the individual studies, baseline and demographic variables were similar among groups. Table 3 below summarizes the baseline and patient demographic characteristics for the combined effectiveness subgroup.
Table 3 Baseline and patient demographics summary—effectiveness subgroup.1
| Characteristic |
O3
N = 83 |
Saline x 3
N = 81 |
O4
N = 104 |
O3A1
N = 90 |
A4
N = 100 |
| No. (%) female |
51 (61.4%) |
49 (60.5%) |
46 (44.2%) |
59 (65.5%) |
50 (50.0%) |
| Mean ±SD age (years) |
65 ± 8 |
68 ± 9 |
59 ± 9 |
59 ± 9 |
59 ± 8 |
| Mean ±SD BMI (kg/m2) |
32 ± 7 |
30 ± 6 |
29 ± 4 |
30 ± 4 |
30 ± 4 |
| Mean ±SD WOMAC Pain) Study Knee |
274 ± 65 |
268 ± 70 |
288 ± 60 |
290 ± 50 |
293 ± 59 |
| Mean ±SD WOMAC Pain Contralateral |
83 ± 57 |
87 ± 54 |
69 ± 47 |
70 ± 47 |
68 ± 48 |
| Mean ±SD Investigator Global (0-100mm) |
53 ± 19 |
51 ± 19 |
59 ± 14 |
58 ± 14 |
58 ± 15 |
| Mean ±SD Patient Global (0-100mm) |
56 ± 20 |
53 ± 22 |
67 ± 15 |
62 ± 17 |
64 ± 15 |
| Notes: 1Patients with Kellgren-Lawrence radiographic grades of II or III at baseline and WOMAC pain in the contralateral knee of <175mm (out of 500). |
Combined Study Results
In the combined analysis of OAK9501 and OAK2001, two subgroup populations (representing patients with baseline Kellgren-Lawrence grade II or III radiographic findings and contralateral knee pain <175 mm on the WOMAC Pain Score) were analyzed together, comprising 5 treatment groups (4 ORTHOVISC® injections [O4], 3 ORTHOVISC® injections followed by 1 arthrocentesis [O3A1], 3 ORTHOVISC® injections [O3], 4 arthrocentesis procedures [A4] and 3 saline injections [Saline]). For the GEE analyses, the O3A1 and O3 groups were also pooled to form a sixth group [O3A1/O3].
The primary effectiveness analysis was performed to determine the proportion of patients achieving a 20% improvement from baseline in the WOMAC Pain Score in conjunction with a minimum absolute improvement of 50 mm from baseline in the WOMAC Pain Score, and a 40% and 50% improvement from baseline in WOMAC Pain Score at four assessment points between Weeks 7/8 to 21/22 for the index knee. A significantly larger proportion of O4 patients achieved 40% and 50% improvements from baseline in WOMAC Pain Score compared to both A4 and Saline over 7- 22 weeks (based on GEE analysis). Similarly, a significantly larger proportion of O3 and O3A1/O3 patients achieved 40% and 50% improvements from baseline in WOMAC Pain Score than Saline patients (based on GEE analysis) (Table 4). Table 5 presents the mean number of patients from the effectiveness subgroup over the four follow-up visits that achieved improvement over weeks 7 through 22.
Table 4 GEE Results (P-Values) for the Effectiveness Subgroups for the Primary Endpoints
| Endpoint |
O4 vs. A4 |
O4 vs.Saline |
O3 vs. Saline |
| ≥ 20% improvement from baseline and 50 mm absolute improvement in WOMAC Pain |
0.0738 |
0.1116 |
0.0789 |
| ≥ 40% improvement in WOMAC Pain Score from baseline |
0.0094* |
0.0015* |
0.0166* |
| ≥ 50% improvement in WOMAC Pain Score from baseline |
0.0360* |
0.0015* |
0.0274* |
O4 4 weekly ORTHOVISC® injections—OAK2001 Study
O3 3 weekly ORTHOVISC® injections—OAK9501 Study
A4 4 control [arthrocentesis only] procedures—OAK2001 Study
Saline 3 control [saline injection] procedures—OAK9501 Study
* Statistically significant |
Table 5 Summary of mean number patients achieving primary individual patient success criteria—effectiveness subgroups from OAK9501 and OAK2001—over weeks 7 through 22 (4 visits).
| Endpoint |
O4
N = 104 |
O3A1
N = 90 |
A4
N = 100 |
O3
N = 83 |
Saline x 3
N = 81 |
| Mean No. (%) patients achieving ≥20% improvement from baseline and absolute improvement of 50 mm in WOMAC Pain |
77.5
(74.5%) |
58.3
(64.7%) |
64.5
(64.5%) |
59.3
(71.4%) |
50.8
(62.7%) |
| Mean No. (%) patients achieving ≥40% improvement from baseline in WOMAC Pain |
68.0
(65.4%) |
47.0
(52.2%) |
48
(48.8%) |
45.8
(55.1%) |
34.3
(42.3%) |
| Mean No. (%) patients achieving ≥50% improvement from baseline in WOMAC Pain |
59.3
(57.0%) |
40.5
(45.0%) |
43.5
(43.5%) |
38.5
(46.4%) |
28.3
(34.9%) |
O4 4 weekly ORTHOVISC® injections—OAK2001 Study
O3A1 3 weekly ORTHOVISC® injections + 1 control [arthrocentesis only] procedure—OAK2001 Study
O3 3 weekly ORTHOVISC® injections—OAK9501 Study
A4 4 control [arthrocentesis only] procedures—OAK2001 Study
Saline 3 control [saline injection] procedures—OAK9501 Study |
Summary
In summary, with respect to patients achieving ≥40% and ≥50% improvement in WOMAC Pain Score compared to baseline, the four injection ORTHOVISC ® regimen demonstrated effectiveness compared to both Saline and Arthrocentesis control procedures, and the three-weekly injection regimen demonstrated effectiveness compared to Saline in the indicated patient population.
Detailed Device Description
Hyaluronan is a high molecular weight polysaccharide composed of repeating disaccharide units of sodium glucuronate and N-acetylglucosamine.
Each syringe contains the following in a 2 mL dose sterile-filled into a syringe:
- Hyaluronan 30 mg
- Sodium Chloride 18 mg
- Water for Injection q.s. up to 2.0 mL
ORTHOVISC® does not contain any synthetic additives.