CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism Of Action
The Optison microspheres create
an echogenic contrast effect in the blood. The acoustic impedance of the
Optison microspheres is much lower than that of the blood. Therefore, impinging
ultrasound waves are scattered and reflected at the microsphere-blood interface
and ultimately may be visualized in the ultrasound image. At the frequencies
used in adult echocardiography (2-5 MHz), the microspheres resonate which
further increases the extent of ultrasound scattering and reflection.
Pharmacodynamics
The median duration of Optison contrast enhancement for
each of the four doses of Optison, 0.2 (40% of recommended dose), 0.5, 3.0, and
5 mL , were approximately one, two, four, and five minutes, respectively [see
Clinical Studies].
Pharmacokinetics
After injection of Optison, diffusion of the perflutren
gas out of the microspheres is limited by the low partition coefficient of the
gas in blood that contributes to the persistence of the microspheres.
The pharmacokinetics of the intact microspheres of
Optison in humans are unknown.
Distribution
The binding of perflutren to plasma proteins and its
partitioning into blood cells are unknown. However, perflutren protein binding
is expected to be minimal due to the low partition coefficient of the gas in
blood.
Elimination
Following intravenous injection, perflutren is cleared
with a pulmonary elimination half-life of 1.3 ± 0.69 minutes (mean ± SD).
Metabolism
Perflutren is a stable gas that is not metabolized. The
human albumin component of the microsphere is expected to be handled by the
normal metabolic routes.
Excretion
Perflutren is eliminated through the lungs within 10
minutes. The mean ± SD recovery was 96% ± 23%. The perflutren concentration in
expired air peaked approximately 30-40 seconds after administration.
Clinical Studies
Echocardiography
The efficacy of Optison was evaluated in two identical
multicenter, controlled, dose escalation studies of 203 patients (Study A:
n=101, Study B: n=102) with sub-optimal non-contrast echocardiography defined
as having at least two out of six segments of the left ventricular endocardial
border inadequately delineated in the apical four-chamber view. Among these
patients there were 79% men, 21% women, 64% White, 25% Black, 10% Hispanic, and
1% other race or ethnic group. The patients had a mean age of 61 years (range:
21 to 83 years), a mean weight of 196 lbs. (range: 117 to 342 lbs.), a mean
height of 68 inches (range: 47 to 78 inches), and a mean body surface area of
2.0m² (range: 1.4 to 2.6m²). Approximately 23% of the
patients had chronic pulmonary disease, and 17% had congestive and dilated
cardiomyopathy with left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEFs) of between 20%
and 40% (by previous echocardiography). Patients with a LVEF of less than 20%
or with New York Heart Association Class IV heart failure were not included in
the studies.
After non-contrast imaging, Optison was administered in
increasing increments as 4 doses (0.2, 0.5, 3.0 and 5 mL) with at least ten
minutes between each dose. Ultrasound settings were optimized for the baseline
(non-contrast) apical four-chamber view and remained unchanged for the contrast
imaging. Static echocardiographic images and video-tape segments were
interpreted by a reader who was blinded to the patient's clinical history and
to the dose of Optison. Left ventricular endocardial border delineation and
left ventricular opacification, were assessed before and after Optison
administration by the measurement of visualized endocardial border length and
ventricular opacification.
In comparison to non-contrast ultrasound, Optison
significantly increased the length of endocardial border that could be
visualized both at end-systole and end-diastole (see Table 3). In these
patients there was a trend towards less visualization in women. Optison
increased left ventricular opacification (peak intensity) in the mid-chamber
and apical views (see Table 4). The imaging effects of Optison on endocardial
border delineation and left ventricular opacification were similar at doses
between 0.5 ml and 5 ml and were also similar among patients with or without
pulmonary disease and dilated cardiomyopathy.
Table 3 :Â Left Ventricular Endocardial Border
Length Before and After OPTISONa, b
OPTISON dose |
Length at End-Systole (cm) |
Length at End-Diastole (cm) |
n |
mean ± S.D. |
n |
mean |
Study A (n=101) |
0 mL (baseline) |
87 |
7.7 ± 3.0 |
86 |
9.3 ± 3.4 |
0.5 mL |
86 |
12.0 ± 4.9 |
91 |
15.8 ± 5.1 |
Study B (n=102) |
0 mL (baseline) |
89 |
8.1 ± 3.4 |
89 |
9.6 ± 3.7 |
0.5 mL |
95 |
12.4 ± 4.9 |
97 |
16.4 ± 4.6 |
a The differences in the number of enrolled
patients and evaluated patients at each dose reflects exclusions based on
withdrawal from the trial, or those with technically inadequate or missing
images.
b An intent-to-treat analysis, with non-favorable values imputed for
missing patients, provided qualitatively similar results. |
Table 4 :Â Intensity of Left Ventricular
Opacificationa Before and After OPTISON™ b,c
OPTISON dose |
Mid-Chamber |
Apex |
Intensity at End-Diastole |
Intensity at End-Systole |
Intensity at End-Diastole |
Intensity at End-Systole |
n |
mean ± S.D. |
n |
mean ± S.D. |
n |
mean ± S.D. |
n |
mean ± S.D. |
Study A (n = 101) |
0 mL (baseline) |
91 |
39.5 ± 16.9 |
91 |
40.0 ± 18.1 |
91 |
46.7 ± 19.7 |
91 |
46.9 ± 20.1 |
0.5 mL |
91 |
57.3 ± 26.8 |
90 |
57.4 ± 26.7 |
91 |
67.0 ± 30.1 |
90 |
64.1 ± 30.2 |
Study B (n = 102) |
0 mL (baseline) |
95 |
40.4 ± 17.4 |
95 |
40.9 ± 17.5 |
95 |
43.7 ± 19.9 |
95 |
45.0 ± 19.6 |
0.5 mL |
97 |
53.3 ± 20.7 |
96 |
53.6 ± 21.0 |
97 |
64.4 ± 25.3 |
96 |
61.6 ± 26.7 |
a Intensity measured by video densitometry in
arbitrary gray scale units (0-255).
b The differences in the number of enrolled patients and evaluated
patients at each dose reflects exclusions based on withdrawal from the trial,
or those with technically inadequate or missing images.
c An intent-to-treat analysis, with non-favorable values imputed for
missing patients, provided qualitatively similar results. |
Pulmonary Hemodynamic Effects
The effect of Optison on
pulmonary hemodynamics was studied in a prospective, open-label study of 30
patients scheduled for pulmonary artery catheterization, including 19 with an
elevated baseline pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP) ( > 35 mmHg) and
11 with a normal PASP ( ≤ 35 mmHg). Systemic hemodynamic parameters and
ECGs were also evaluated. No clinically important pulmonary hemodynamic,
systemic hemodynamic, or ECG changes were observed. This study did not assess
the effect of Optison on visualization of cardiac or pulmonary structures.