Enter drug's generic or brand name below. Results will appear here. Note: all drug related information obtained on this page is provided by RX List.
Using the RX LIST database:
(1) Enter the drug name in the search box below and hit ENTER
(2) The rx list web site will open here with the drug search completed. Next, scroll down the page to locate the link to the drug you are searching for and then click on the link.
OPTIMARK
(gadoversetamide) Injection
WARNING
NEPHROGENIC SYSTEMIC FIBROSIS
Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs ) increase the risk for NSF among patients with impaired elimination of the drugs. Avoid use of GBCAs in these patients unless the diagnostic information is essential and not available with non-contrasted MRI or other modalities. NSF may result in fatal or debilitating fibros is affecting the skin, muscle and internal organs.
Optimark (gadoversetamide) injection is a nonionic gadolinium chelate of diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid bismethoxyethylamide (gadoversetamide), for intravenous injection.
Optimark injection is provided as a sterile, preservative-free, nonpyrogenic, clear, and colorless to pale yellow, aqueous solution of gadoversetamide. Each mL of Optimark contains 330.9 mg of gadoversetamide (0.5 millimole), 28.4 mg of calcium versetamide sodium (0.05 millimole), 0.7 mg calcium chloride dihydrate (0.005 millimole), and water for injection. Sodium hydroxide and/or hydrochloric acid may have been added for pH adjustment.
Gadoversetamide is designated chemically as [8, 11-bis(carboxymethyl)-14-[2-[(2- methoxyethyl)amino]-2-oxoethyl]-6-oxo-2-oxa-5,8,11,14-tetraazahexadecan-16-oato(3-)] gadolinium with a formula weight of 661.77 g/mol and empirical formula of C20H34N5O10Gd. The structural formula of gadoversetamide in aqueous solution is:
 |
Optimark has a pH of 5.5 to 7.5. Pertinent physiochemical data are provided below (Table 4).
Table 4 Physiochemical Properties
of Optimark
| Osmolality (mOsmol/kg water) @ 37°C | 1110 |
| Viscosity (cP) @ 20°C | 3.1 |
| @ 37°C | 2.0 |
| Density (g/mL) @ 25°C | 1.160 |
Optimark has an osmolality of approximately 3.9 times that of plasma (285 mOsm/kg water) and is hypertonic under conditions of use.
Optimark is indicated for use with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with abnormal bloodbrain barrier or abnormal vascularity of the brain, spine and associated tissues.
Optimark is indicated for use with MRI to provide contrast enhancement and facilitate visualization of lesions with abnormal vascularity in the liver of patients who are highly suspect for liver structural abnormalities on computed tomography.
Table 1 Dosage Chart for
Optimark Injection
| Body Weight Kilograms (kg) | 0.1 mmol/kg Volume (mL) |
| 40 | 8 |
| 50 | 10 |
| 60 | 12 |
| 70 | 14 |
| 80 | 16 |
| 90 | 18 |
| 100 | 20 |
| 110 | 22 |
| 120 | 24 |
| 130 | 26 |
| 140 | 28 |
| 150 | 30 |
Optimark is supplied as a clear, colorless to slightly yellow solution for injection containing 330.9 mg gadoversetamide per mL (equivalent to 0.5 mmol/mL).
Optimark is a clear, colorless to slightly yellow solution containing 330.9 mg/mL (equivalent to 0.5 mmol/mL) of gadoversetamide for injection. Optimark is supplied in 10 mL vials containing 5 mL or 10 mL of solution and is also provided in 20 mL vials containing 15 mL or 20 mL of solution. Each single dose vial is rubber stoppered with an aluminum seal and the contents are sterile. Optimark is supplied in 10 mL, 15 mL, 20 mL or 30 mL syringes containing 10 mL, 15 mL, 20 mL or 30 mL of solution respectively. Each syringe is sealed with rubber closures and the contents are sterile. Vials and syringes are contained in shipping cartons with the following configurations:
5 mL in glass vials in cartons of 10 vials (NDC Code 0019-1177-02)
10 mL in glass vials in cartons of 10 vials (NDC Code 0019-1177-04)
15 mL in glass vials in cartons of 10 vials (NDC Code 0019-1177-06)
20 mL in glass vials in cartons of 10 vials (NDC Code 0019-1177-08)
10 mL in plastic syringes in cartons of 10 syringes (NDC Code 0019-1177-11)
15 mL in plastic syringes in cartons of 10 syringes (NDC Code 0019-1177-16)
20 mL in plastic syringes in cartons of 10 syringes (NDC Code 0019-1177-21)
30 mL in plastic syringes in cartons of 10 syringes (NDC Code 0019-1177-31)
Optimark should be stored at 20°C to 25°C (68°F to 77°F) [see USP Controlled Room Temperature] and protected from light and freezing. Optimark may be stored at 37°C for up to one month in a contrast media warmer utilizing circulating warm air. For periods longer than one month, store at 20°C to 25°C (68°F to 77°F).
Manufactured by: Liebel-Flarsheim Company LLC, Raleigh, NC 27616. Revised: Aug 2016
The following adverse reactions are discussed in greater detail in other sections of the prescribing information:
Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice.
The adverse reactions described in this section were observed in a total of 1,309 subjects (24 healthy volunteers and 1,285 patients in clinical trials). Patients ranged in age from 12 to 85 years (mean age of 50 years) and 680 subjects (52%) were men. The ethnic distribution was 84% White, 9% Black, 3% Asian, and 4% other.
Overall, 460 subjects (35%) reported at least one adverse reaction. Most adverse reactions were mild or moderate in severity. The most commonly noted adverse reactions were: injection associated discomfort (26%), headache (9.4%), vasodilatation (6.4%), taste perversion (6.2%), dizziness (3.7%), nausea (3.2%), and paresthesia (2.2%). Table 2 lists adverse reactions reported in 1% or greater of patients.
Table 2 Adverse Reactions Experienced by
≥1% of Patients
| Body System or Event | Optimark (N = 1309) |
| Injection associated discomfort | 26.4% |
| Headache | 9.4% |
| Vasodilatation | 6.4% |
| Taste Perversion | 6.2% |
| Dizziness | 3.7% |
| Nausea | 3.2% |
| Paresthesia | 2.2% |
| Diarrhea | 1.9% |
| Pain Abdomen | 1.8% |
| Asthenia | 1.5% |
| Injection Site Reaction | 1.5% |
| Rhinitis | 1.5% |
| Dyspepsia | 1.2% |
| Pain Back | 1.2% |
| Pain | 1.0% |
The following adverse reactions occurred in less than 1% of the patients:
allergic reaction, facial edema, fever, malaise, neck rigidity, neck pain, pelvic pain, increased sweating
arrhythmia, chest pain, hypertension, hypotension, pallor, palpitation, syncope, tachycardia, vasospasm
anorexia, constipation, dry mouth, dysphagia, eructation, increased salivation, thirst, vomiting
increased creatinine, edema, hypercalcemia
arthralgia, leg cramps, myalgia, spasm
agitation, anxiety, confusion, diplopia, dystonia, hypertonia, hypesthesia, somnolence, tremor, vertigo
cough, dyspnea, laryngismus, pharyngitis, sinusitis, voice alteration
erythema multiforme, pruritus, rash, thrombophlebitis, urticaria
parosmia, tinnitus
oliguria
The following adverse reactions have been identified during post-approval use of Optimark. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to Optimark.
Drug interactions with other contrast agents and other drugs have not been studied.
Included as part of the "PRECAUTIONS" Section
Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) increase the risk for NSF among patients with impaired elimination of the drugs. Avoid use of GBCAs among these patients unless the diagnostic information is essential and not available with non-contrast enhanced MRI or other modalities. The GBCA-associated NSF risk appears highest for patients with chronic, severe kidney disease (GFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2 ) as well as patients with acute kidney injury. Do not administer Optimark to these patients. The risk appears lower for patients with chronic, moderate kidney disease (GFR 30 to 59 mL/min/1.73m2 ) and little, if any, for patients with chronic, mild kidney disease (GFR 60 to 89 mL/min/1.73m2 ). NSF may result in fatal or debilitating fibrosis affecting the skin, muscle and internal organs. Report any diagnosis of NSF following Optimark administration to Liebel-Flarsheim Company LLC (1-855-266-5037) or FDA (1- 800-FDA-1088 or www.fda.gov/medwatch).
Screen patients for acute kidney injury and other conditions that may reduce renal function. Features of acute kidney injury consist of rapid (over hours to days) and usually reversible decrease in kidney function, commonly in the setting of surgery, severe infection, injury, or drug-induced kidney toxicity. Serum creatinine levels and estimated GFR may not reliably assess renal function in the setting of acute kidney injury. For patients at risk for chronic kidney disease (e.g., age >60 years, diabetes mellitus or chronic hypertension), estimate the GFR through laboratory testing.
Among the factors that may increase the risk for NSF are repeated or higher than recommended doses of a GBCA and the degree of renal impairment at the time of exposure. Record the specific GBCA and the dose administered to a patient. When administering Optimark, do not exceed the recommended dose and allow a sufficient period of time for elimination of the drug prior to any re-administration [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION].
In patients with chronically reduced renal function, acute kidney injury requiring dialysis has occurred with the use of GBCAs. The risk of acute kidney injury may increase with increasing dose of the contrast agent; administer the lowest dose necessary for adequate imaging.
Severe hypersensitivity reactions including anaphylaxis have been observed with administration of gadolinium products including Optimark. Before administering Optimark ensure the availability of resuscitation equipment and personnel trained in resuscitation techniques. Patients with a history of allergy, drug reactions or other hypersensitivity-like disorders may be at greater risk and should be closely observed during the procedure and for several hours after drug administration. If a reaction occurs, stop Optimark and immediately begin appropriate therapy including resuscitation.
Interference by Optimark in the measurements of serum iron, copper and zinc has been observed. Optimark causes interference in the measurement of serum calcium using the ortho-cresophthalin complexone (OCP) colorimetric method. In the presence of Optimark, OCP produces an erroneous, low value for serum calcium. The magnitude of this artifact is proportional to the concentration of Optimark in the blood, and accurate values can be obtained approximately 90 minutes following injection. In patients with renal insufficiency, clearance of Optimark is slowed and the interference with calcium determination by OCP is prolonged. Neither the arsenazo III dye system nor the inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy methods for calcium assay are affected by Optimark.
Long-term animal studies have not been performed to evaluate the carcinogenic potential of gadoversetamide. The results of the following genotoxicity assays were negative: Salmonella/E. Coli reverse mutation (Ames) assay, mouse lymphoma mutagenesis assay, and the in vivo mammalian micronucleus assay. The in vitro CHO chromosome aberration assay without metabolic activation was positive.
Gadoversetamide administered to rats in a fertility study was shown to have irreversible reduction and degeneration of spermatocytes in testes and epididymides, and impaired male fertility following intravenous doses of 2.0 mmol/kg/day (4 times the human dose based on body surface area) for 7 weeks. These effects were not observed at dose of 0.5 mmol/kg/day (1 times the human dose based on body surface area).
In a separate 28-day repeat dose study in rats, gadoversetamide was shown to have irreversible reduction of male reproductive organ weights, degeneration of the germinal epithelium of the testes, presence of germ cells in the epididymides, and reduced sperm count following daily intravenous doses of 3.0 mmol/kg/day (6 times the human dose based on body surface area). These effects were not observed at 0.6 mmol/kg/day (1 times the human dose based on surface area). These effects were not observed in similar studies conducted in dogs.
In a single dose study in rats, gadoversetamide did not produce adverse effects on the male reproductive system 24 hours and 14 days after intravenous administration of 0.5 to 15 mmol/kg (1 to 25 times the human dose based on body surface area).
There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women. Optimark should be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus.
Gadoversetamide administered to rats reduced neonatal weights from birth through weaning at maternal doses of 0.5 mmol/kg/day (1 times the human dose based on body surface area) for 5 weeks (including gestation) and paternal doses of 0.5 mmol/kg/day for 12 weeks. This effect was not observed at 0.1 mmol/kg (0.2 times the human dose based on body surface area). Maternal toxicity was not observed at any dose.
Gadoversetamide injection caused a reduced mean fetal weight, abnormal liver lobation, delayed ossification of sternebrae, and delayed behavioral development (startle reflex and air righting reflex) in fetuses from female rats dosed with 4.9 mmol/kg/day (10 times the human dose based on body surface area) on days 7 through 17 of gestation. These effects were not observed at 0.7 mmol/kg/day (1 times the human dose based on body surface area). Maternal toxicity was observed at 4.9 mmol/kg/day.
Gadoversetamide injection caused forelimb flexures and cardiovascular changes in fetuses from female rabbits dosed with 0.4 and 1.6 mmol/kg/day (respectively, 1 and 4 times the human dose based on body surface area) on gestation days 6 through 18. The cardiovascular changes were malformed thoracic arteries, a septal defect, and abnormal ventricle. These effects were not observed at 0.1 mmol/kg/day (0.3 times the human dose based on body surface area). Maternal toxicity was not observed at any dose.
Radiolabeled gadoversetamide (153Gd) was excreted in the milk of lactating rats receiving a single intravenous dose of 0.1 mmol/kg. Women should discontinue nursing and discard breast milk up to 72 hours after Optimark administration [see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY].
The safety and effectiveness of Optimark in pediatric patients have not been established. Pediatric patients may be particularly vulnerable to adverse GBCA reactions due to renal immaturity or unrecognized renal insufficiency.
Since gadoversetamide is cleared from the body by glomerular filtration, the risk of adverse reactions may be greater in patients with impaired renal function (GFR ≥30 and <90 mL/min/1.73m2 ). Due to the risk for NSF, estimate the GFR through laboratory testing for patients >60 years of age [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS].
A single intravenous dose of 0.1 mmol/kg of Optimark was administered to 28 patients (17 men and 11 women) with impaired renal function (mean serum creatinine of 2.4 mg/dL). Sixteen patients had concurrent central nervous system or liver pathology. Renal impairment was shown to delay the elimination of gadoversetamide (see Table 3). The mean cumulative urinary excretion of gadoversetamide at 72 hours was approximately 93.5% for renally impaired patients and 95.8% for subjects with normal renal function. Dose adjustments in renal impairment have not been studied. Optimark has been shown to be removed from the body by hemodialysis [see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY].
A single intravenous dose of 0.1 mmol/kg of Optimark was administered to 4 patients (2 men and 2 women) with impaired hepatic function. Hepatically impaired patients with normal renal function had plasma kinetics similar to normal subjects (see Table 3).
Table 3 Elimination Profiles of Normal, Renally Impaired and Hepatically Impaired Men and
Women (mean ± SD)
| Population | Elimination t1/2 (hours ) | |
| Men (N = 52) | Women (N = 48) | |
| Healthy Volunteers | 1.73 ± 0.31 (N = 8) | 1.73 ± 0.40 (N = 4) |
| Normal Patients | 1.90 ± 0.50 (N = 25) | 1.94 ± 0.57 (N = 31) |
| Renally Impaired | 8.74 ± 5.14 (N = 17) | 6.91 ± 2.46 (N = 11) |
| Hepatically Impaired | 2.09 ± 0.03 (N = 2) | 2.35 ± 1.09 (N = 2) |
Clinical consequences of overdosage with Optimark have not been reported. Treatment of overdose is directed toward supporting vital functions and prompt institution of symptomatic therapy. Optimark has been shown to be dialyzable [see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY].
Optimark is contraindicated in patients with:
Gadoversetamide is a paramagnetic agent that develops a magnetic moment when placed in a magnetic field. The relatively large magnetic moment can enhance the relaxation rates of water protons in its vicinity, leading to an increase in signal intensity (brightness) of tissues.
In MRI, visualization of normal and pathological brain, spinal and hepatic tissue depends in part on variations in the radiofrequency signal intensity that occurs with: 1) changes in proton density; 2) alterations of the spin-lattice or longitudinal relaxation time (T1); and 3) variation of the spin-spin or transverse relaxation time (T2). When placed in a magnetic field, gadoversetamide decreases T1 and T2 relaxation times in tissues where it accumulates. At the recommended dose, the effect is primarily on T1 relaxation time, and produces an increase in signal intensity (brightness).
The pharmacokinetics of intravenously administered gadoversetamide in normal subjects conforms to a two-compartment open-model with mean distribution and elimination half-lives (reported as mean ± SD) of about 13.3 ± 6.8 and 103.6 ± 19.5 minutes.
Gadoversetamide does not undergo protein binding in vitro. In pregnant and lactating rats which received Gd-labeled gadoversetamide, radioactivity was detected in the placenta, fetus, and maternal milk. The volume of distribution at steady state of gadoversetamide in normal subjects is 162 ± 25 mL/kg, roughly equivalent to that of extracellular water.
Gadoversetamide does not appear to cross the intact blood-brain barrier in early- or delayed- phase imaging. However, disruption of the blood-brain barrier or abnormal vascularity allows accumulation of gadoversetamide in the extravascular spaces of lesions.
Deposition with Repeated Dosing
Increased signal intensity on non-contrast T1-weighted images within the brain, mainly the globus pallidus and the dentate nucleus, has been observed after multiple administrations of linear (ionic and nonionic) gadolinium-based contrast agents due to gadolinium deposition.
Following repeated GBCA administration, gadolinium deposits may be present for months or years in bone, liver, skin, brain, and other organs. Deposition depends on multiple factors and may be greater following administration of gadoversetamide and other linear GBCAs than following administration of macrocyclic GBCAs. GBCAs have been assocated with the development of NSF in patients with renal impairment [see BOX WARNING]. The clinical significance of gadolinium retention in the body and brain is otherwise unknown.
Gadoversetamide is not metabolized.
Gadoversetamide (0.1 mmol/kg) is eliminated primarily in the urine with 95.5 ± 17.4% (mean ± SD) of the administered dose eliminated by 24 hours. Animal data demonstrated that insignificant levels of Gd-labeled gadoversetamide are eliminated via the feces. In experimentally induced anephria in the rat, hepatobiliary excretion did not significantly compensate for the absence of urinary elimination. The renal and plasma clearance rates of gadoversetamide in normal subjects are similar (69 ± 15.4 and 72 ± 16.3 mL/hr/kg, respectively) indicating that the drug is cleared through the kidneys via glomerular filtration. Within the studied dose range (0.1 to 0.7 mmol/kg), the kinetics of gadoversetamide appear to be linear.
Gadoversetamide is removed from the body by hemodialysis. Approximately 98% of the administered dose (0.1 mmol/kg) was cleared from the circulation over the three dialysis sessions that occurred 2 hours, 48 hours, and 120 hours after injection. After each of three dialysis sessions, respectively, 70%, 93%, and 98% of the administered dose was cleared from the plasma. The mean dialysis clearance of gadoversetamide was 93.2 ± 17.1 mL/min, or 48% of the creatinine clearance (194 ± 18.6 mL/min), using a high flux PMMA membrane.
Optimark was evaluated in 4 controlled clinical trials (two liver and two CNS studies). Out of 461 patients who received Optimark, there were 252 men and 209 women with a mean age of 49 years (range 12 to 82 years); 83% were Caucasian, 9% Black, 3% Asian, and 5% other racial or ethnic groups. The trials were designed to compare combined non-contrast and Optimark 0.1 mmol/kg contrast MR images to non-contrast MR images, based on pre-specified imaging characteristics (endpoints).
In the two CNS studies, MR images were analyzed from 262 patients who were highly suspect for CNS disorders and received Optimark. Pre-contrast and pre-plus-post-contrast (combined) images were independently evaluated by three blinded readers (each reader examined approximately 1/3 of the images). The images were evaluated by the blinded readers for the following endpoints using a scale from 1 to 10: the level of conspicuity of all lesions, the ability to delineate lesion borders from parenchyma/structures, the number of lesions, and the confidence in the number of lesions. As shown in Table 5, the first row of each endpoint group represents the difference in the mean score of the combined pre- and post-contrast MRI from the mean score of the pre-contrast MRI alone. Also, the table shows the number of patients whose paired MRI images were better, worse or the same as the precontrast MRI. Results from the contrast image alone were not evaluated. In Table 5 for these endpoints, when read in combination with the non-contrast images, Optimark provided a statistically significant improvement over baseline. In addition to these measures, the images were evaluated for the blinded reader’s confidence in the diagnosis. Although improvement over baseline was noted, the diagnosis was not rigorously confirmed.
Table 5 Results of MRI Central Nervous System Studies
with 0.1 mmol/kg Optimark
| Endpoints | Study A | Study B |
| Optimark N = 132† |
Optimark N = 129 |
|
| Conspicuity: Difference of Means(a) | 0.39* | 0.66* |
| Worse | 24 (18%) | 24 (19%) |
| Same | 69 (52%) | 52 (40%) |
| Better | 39 (30%) | 53 (41%) |
| Border Delineation: Difference of Means | 0.70* | 0.86* |
| Worse | 23 (17%) | 25 (19%) |
| Same | 55 (42%) | 51 (40%) |
| Better | 54 (41%) | 53 (41%) |
| Number of Lesions: Difference of Means | ||
| Pre | 1.8 | 3.0 |
| Pair(b) | 2.0◊ | 3.3* |
| Worse | 9 (7%) | 16 (12%) |
| Same | 101 (77%) | 86 (67%) |
| Better | 22 (16%) | 27 (21%) |
| Confidence in Number of Lesions: Difference of Means | 0.11* | 0.56* |
| Worse | 19 (14%) | 18 (14%) |
| Same | 86 (65%) | 60 (47%) |
| Better | 27 (20%) | 51 (40%) |
|
(a)Difference of means = (Side-by-side pre- and post-
Optimark mean) - (pre-mean) (b)Pair = Side-by-side pre- and post-Optimark *Statistically significant for both the median (Wilcoxon test) and mean (paired t test) ◊Statistically significant for median (Wilcoxon test) †1 patient was excluded from this analysis because a noncontrast image was not obtained for that patient |
||
In the two liver studies, MR images were analyzed from 199 patients with a suspected liver abnormality on a contrast CT who received Optimark. Patients had both pre-contrast and post-contrast MRI scans covering the entire liver. In each study, the images were read by 3 blinded readers (each reader examined approximately 1/3 of the images). Using a scale of 1 to 10, the images were evaluated by the blinded readers for the level of conspicuity of all lesions, the ability to delineate lesion borders from parenchyma/structures, the number of lesions and confidence in the number of lesions. The results are shown in Table 6. The first row of each endpoint group represents the difference in the mean score of the combined pre- and post-contrast MRI from the mean score of the pre-contrast MRI alone. Also, the table shows the number of patients whose paired MRI images were better, worse or the same as the precontrast MRI. Results from the contrast image alone were not evaluated. As shown in Table 6 for these endpoints, when read in combination with the non-contrast image, Optimark provided a statistically significant improvement over non-contrast images. In addition to these measures, the images were evaluated for the blinded reader’s confidence in the diagnosis. Although improvement over baseline was noted, the trial was not designed to rigorously confirm the diagnosis.
Table 6 Results of MRI Liver Studies with 0.1
mmol/kg Optimark
| Endpoints | Study C | Study D |
| Optimark N = 99 |
Optimark N = 100 |
|
| Conspicuity: Difference of Means(a) | 0.77* | 0.75* |
| Worse | 21 (21%) | 14 (14%) |
| Same | 37 (37%) | 50 (50%) |
| Better | 41 (41%) | 36 (36%) |
| Border Delineation: Difference of Means | 0.77* | 0.69* |
| Worse | 21 (21%) | 15 (15%) |
| Same | 38 (38%) | 45 (45%) |
| Better | 40 (40%) | 40 (40%) |
| Number of Lesions: Difference of Means | ||
| Pre | 2.4 | 3.5 |
| Pair(b) | 3.0* | 3.8 |
| Worse | 13 (13%) | 16 (16%) |
| Same | 50 (51%) | 58 (58%) |
| Better | 36 (36%) | 26 (26%) |
| Confidence in Number of Lesions: Difference of Means | 1.6* | 1.0* |
| Worse | 39 (39%) | 38 (38%) |
| Same | 2 (2%) | 8 (8%) |
| Better | 58 (59%) | 54 (54%) |
| (a)Difference of means = (Side-by-side pre- and post-
Optimark mean) - (pre-mean) (b)Pair = Side-by-side pre- and post-Optimark *Statistically significant for both the median (Wilcoxon test) and mean (paired t test) †Borderline statistical significance in paired t test |
||
A subsequent study of 140 normal volunteers evaluated the safety of Optimark 0.1 mmol/kg delivered by power injector. Imaging results were not studied. The normal volunteers were randomized to receive Optimark injected manually, or Optimark or saline injected at 3 different power injector rates. At 2 mL/sec, the adverse event rates were comparable in the Optimark and saline controls when delivered manually and by power injector. In these small sample sizes, there was a trend towards increasing adverse events with increasing rates of power injection. Patients with abnormal vascularity were not evaluated. The safety and efficacy of power injector rates higher than 2 mL/sec has not been established.
Instruct patients to inform their physician if they:
GBCAs increase the risk for NSF in patients with impaired elimination of the drugs. To counsel patients at risk for NSF:
Instruct the patients to contact their physician if they develop signs or symptoms of NSF following Optimark administration, such as burning, itching, swelling, scaling, hardening and tightening of the skin; red or dark patches on the skin; stiffness in joints with trouble moving, bending or straightening the arms, hands, legs or feet; pain in the hip bones or ribs; or muscle weakness.
Instruct patients to inform their physician if they:
