CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Pharmacodynamics
NovoSeven (coagulation factor viia (recombinant)) is recombinant Factor VIIa and, when complexed with tissue factor
can activate coagulation Factor X to Factor Xa, as well as coagulation Factor
IX to Factor IXa. Factor Xa, in complex with other factors, then converts prothrombin
to thrombin, which leads to the formation of a hemostatic plug by converting
fibrinogen to fibrin and thereby inducing local hemostasis. This process may
also occur on the surface of activated platelets.
The effect of NovoSeven (coagulation factor viia (recombinant)) upon coagulation in patients with or without hemophilia
has been assessed in different model systems. In an in vitro model of
tissue-factor-initiated blood coagulation (Figure A)2, the addition
of NovoSeven (coagulation factor viia (recombinant)) increased both the rate and level of thrombin generation in normal
and hemophilia A blood, with an effect shown at NovoSeven (coagulation factor viia (recombinant)) concentrations as
low as 10 nM. In this model, fresh human blood was treated with corn trypsin
inhibitor (CTI) to block the contact pathway of blood coagulation. Tissue factor
(TF) was added to initiate clotting in the presence and absence of NovoSeven (coagulation factor viia (recombinant))
for both types of blood.
In a separate model, and in line with previous reports3, escalating
doses of NovoSeven (coagulation factor viia (recombinant)) in hemophilia plasma demonstrate a dose-dependent increase
in thrombin generation (Figure B). In this model, platelet rich normal and hemophilia
plasma was adjusted with autologous plasma to 200, 000 platelets/μl. Coagulation
was initiated by addition of tissue factor and CaCl2. Thrombin generation was
measured in the presence of a thrombin substrate and various added concentrations
of rFVIIa.
Figure A
Figure B
TF-initiated clotting of normal and hemophilia A platelet rich plasma in
the presence of rFVIIa.
Pharmacokinetics
Hemophilia A or B
Single-dose pharmacokinetics of NovoSeven (coagulation factor viia (recombinant)) (17.5, 35, and 70 μg/kg) exhibited
dose-proportional behavior in 15 subjects with hemophilia A or B.4 Factor
VII clotting activities were measured in plasma drawn prior to and during a
24-hour period after NovoSeven (coagulation factor viia (recombinant)) administration. The median apparent volume of
distribution at steady state was 103 mL/kg (range 78-139). Median clearance
was 33 mL/kg/hr (range 27-49). The median residence time was 3.0 hours (range
2.4-3.3), and the t1/2 was 2.3 hours (range 1.7-2.7). The median in vivo
plasma recovery was 44% (30-71%).
Congenital Factor VII deficiency
Single dose pharmacokinetics of NovoSeven (coagulation factor viia (recombinant)) in congenital Factor VII deficiency,
at doses of 15 and 30 μg per kg body weight, showed no significant difference
between the two doses used with regard to dose-independent parameters: total
body clearance (70.8-79.1 mL/hr x kg), volume of distribution at steady state
(280-290 mL/kg), mean residence time (3.75-3.80 hr), and half-life (2.82-3.11
hr). The mean in vivo plasma recovery was approximately 20% (18. 9%-22.
2%).
The normal Factor VII plasma concentration is 0. 5 μg/mL. Factor VII levels
of 15-25% (0.075 – 0.125 μg/mL) are generally sufficient to achieve normal
hemostasis. 5 A 70 kg individual with FVII deficiency (plasma volume
of approximately 3000 mL) would thus require 3.2 - 5.4 μg/kg of NovoSeven (coagulation factor viia (recombinant))
to secure hemostasis, assuming 100% recovery. Since the mean plasma recovery
for NovoSeven (coagulation factor viia (recombinant)) is 20% for FVII-deficient patients, a NovoSeven (coagulation factor viia (recombinant)) dose range of
16-27 μg/kg would be required to achieve sufficient FVII plasma levels for
hemostasis.
Clinical Studies
No direct comparisons to other coagulation products have been conducted,
therefore no conclusions regarding the comparative safety or efficacy can be
made.
Hemophilia A or B with Inhibitors to Factor VIII or Factor IX
Open Protocol Use
The largest number of patients who received NovoSeven (coagulation factor viia (recombinant)) during the investigational
phase of product development were in an open protocol study (Study A)6,7,8
that began enrollment in 1988, shortly after the completion of the pharmacokinetic
study. These patients included persons with hemophilia types A or B (with or
without inhibitors), persons with acquired inhibitors to Factor VIII or Factor
IX, and a few FVII deficient patients. The clinical situations were diverse
and included muscle/joint bleeds, mucocutaneous bleeds, surgical prophylaxis,
intracerebral bleeds, and other emergent situations. Dose schedules were suggested
by Novo Nordisk, but they were subject to the option of the investigator. Clinical
outcomes were not reported in a standardized manner. Therefore, the clinical
data from Study A are problematic for the evaluation of the safety and efficacy
of the product by statistical methods.
Dosing Study
A double-blind, randomized comparison trial (Study B)9 of two dose
levels of NovoSeven (coagulation factor viia (recombinant)) in the treatment of joint, muscle and mucocutaneous hemorrhages
was conducted in hemophilia A and B patients with and without inhibitors. Patients
received NovoSeven (coagulation factor viia (recombinant)) as soon as they could be evaluated in the treatment centers
(4 to 18 hours after experiencing a bleed). Thirty-five patients were treated
at the 35 μg/kg dose (59 joint, 15 muscle and 5 mucocutaneous bleeding episodes)
and 43 patients were treated at the 70 μg/kg dose (85 joint and 14 muscle
bleeding episodes). Dosing was to be repeated at 2.5 hour intervals but ranged
up to four hours for some patients. Efficacy was assessed at 12 ± 2 hours
or at end of treatment, whichever occurred first. Based on a subjective evaluation
by the investigator, the respective efficacy rates for the 35 and 70 μg/kg
groups were: excellent 59% and 60%, effective 12% and 11%, and partially effective
17% and 20%. The average number of injections required to achieve hemostasis
was 2.8 and 3.2 for the 35 and 70 μg/kg groups, respectively.
One patient in the 35 μg/kg group and three in the 70 μg/kg group experienced
serious adverse events that were not considered related to NovoSeven (coagulation factor viia (recombinant)) . Two unrelated
deaths occurred; one patient died of AIDS and the other of intracranial hemorrhage
secondary to trauma.
Surgery Studies
Two clinical trials (Studies C and D) were conducted to evaluate the safety
and efficacy of rFVIIa administration during and after surgery in hemophilia
A or B patients with inhibitors.
Study C was a randomized, double-blind, parallel group clinical trial
(29 patients with hemophilia A or B and inhibitors or acquired inhibitors to
FVIII/FIX, undergoing major or minor surgical procedures). 10 Patients
received bolus intravenous rFVIIa (either 35 μg/kg, N=15; or 90 μg/kg, N=14)
prior to surgery, intra-operatively as required, then every 2 hours for the
following 48 hours beginning at closure of the wound. Additional doses were
administered every 2 to 6 hours up to an additional 3 days to maintain hemostasis.
After a maximum of 5 days of double-blind treatment, therapy could be continued
in an open-label manner if necessary (90 μg/kg rFVIIa every 2-6 hours). Efficacy
was assessed during the intra-operative period, and postoperatively from the
time of wound closure (Hour 0) through Day 5.
When efficacy assessments at each time point were tabulated by a last value
carried forward approach (patients who completed the study early having achieved
effective hemostasis were counted as “effective”and those who discontinued
due to treatment failure or adverse events were counted as “ineffective”at
each time point thereafter), the results at the end of the 5-day double-blind
treatment period were as summarized in the table below. Twenty-three patients
successfully completed the entire study (including the open-label period after
the 5-day double blind period) with satisfactory hemostasis.
Study C: Dose Comparison of Efficacy in Major and Minor Surgery
-LastValue Carried Forward*
Number of effective (E)/ineffective (I)
responses in each dose group |
|
Major Surgery |
Minor Surgery |
35 μg/kg
(n= 5) |
90 μg/kg
(n= 6) |
35 μg/kg
(n =10) |
90 μg/kg
(n= 8) |
Total
(n =29) |
|
E |
I |
E |
I |
E |
I |
E |
I |
E |
I |
Intraoperative |
|
5 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
7 |
1 |
28 |
1 |
Post-Op |
Hour |
0 |
5 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
8 |
2 |
6 |
2 |
25 |
4 |
|
8 |
4 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
9 |
1 |
7 |
1 |
25 |
4 |
|
24 |
4 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
9 |
1 |
6 |
2 |
25 |
4 |
|
48 |
3 |
2 |
6 |
0 |
8 |
2 |
8 |
0 |
25 |
4 |
Day |
3 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
0 |
8 |
2 |
8 |
0 |
24 |
5 |
|
4 |
3 |
2 |
6 |
0 |
8 |
2 |
8 |
0 |
25 |
4 |
|
5 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
1 |
8 |
2 |
8 |
0 |
24 |
5 |
*Patients who completed the study early
having achieved effective hemostasis were counted as effective at subsequent
time-points, and patients who discontinued due to treatment failure or
adverse events were counted as ineffective at subsequent time-points.
Only effective ratings were counted as successful hemostasis (ratings
of “partially effective” were not counted). Ten patients completed
the study by Day 5 because their bleeding had resolved and they were discharged
from the hospital. Three patients dropped out of the study due to ineffective
therapy and 1 patient left the study due to an adverse event. |
E: Number of patients where rFVIIa treatment was effective; I: Number of patients
where rFVIIa treatment was ineffective
Study C: Dosing by Surgery Category
|
Major Surgery |
Minor Surgery |
35 μg/kg
(n = 5) |
90 μg/kg
(n = 6) |
35 μg/kg
(n = 10) |
90 μg/kg
(n = 8) |
Days of dosing, median (range) |
15 (2-26) |
9.5 (8-17) |
4 (3-6) |
6 (3-13) |
No.injections, median (range) |
135 (11-186) |
81 (71-128) |
29.5 (24-44) |
39.5 (26-98) |
Median total dose, mg (range) |
656 (31-839) |
569 (107-698) |
45.5 (14-171) |
67 (31-122) |
Study D was an open-label, randomized, parallel trial conducted to compare
the safety and efficacy of i. v. bolus (N=12) and i. v. continuous infusion
(N=12) administration of rFVIIa in hemophilia A or B patients with inhibitors
who were undergoing elective major surgery. The types of surgeries that were
performed included knee (N=13), hip (N=3), abdomen/lower pelvis (N=2), groin/inguinal
area (N=2), circumcision (N=1), eye (N=1), frontal/temporal region of cranium
(N=1), and oral cavity (N=1).
Prior to surgery, a 90 μg/kg bolus dose of rFVIIa was administered to both
bolus and continuous infusion groups. The bolus injection group then received
90 μg/kg rFVIIa by i. v. bolus injection every 2 hours during the procedure
and for the first 5 days, then every 4 hours from Day 6 to Day 10. The continuous
infusion group received 50 μg/kg/h rFVIIa by i. v. continuous infusion for
the first 5 days, and infusion of 25 μg/kg/h from Day 6 to Day 10. For both
rFVIIa-treated groups, two bolus rescue doses of 90 μg/kg were permitted during
any 24-hour period.
The bolus injection (90 μg/kg) and continuous infusion (50 μg/kg/h) treatment
groups showed comparable efficacy in achieving and maintaining hemostasis in
major surgery from wound closure through Day 10. For the Global Hemostasis Treatment
Evaluation for overall success in achieving and maintaining hemostasis at the
end of the study period, treatment was rated as being effective in 9 patients
(75%) and ineffective in 3 patients (25%) for both treatment groups.
When efficacy assessments at each time point were tabulated by a last value
carried forward approach (patients who completed the study early having achieved
effective hemostasis were counted as “effective” at each time point,
and those who discontinued due to treatment failure counted as “ineffective”
at each time point thereafter), the results were as summarized in the table
below.
Study D: Efficacy of Bolus Dosing vs. Continuous Infusion
in Major Surgery - Last Value Carried Forward*
|
Number of effective (E)/ineffective (I)
responses in each dose group |
Bolus Injection
(rFVIIa 90μg/kg)
n = 12 |
Continuous Infusion
(rFVIIa 50μg/kg/h)
n =12 |
E |
I |
E |
I |
Post-Op |
Hour |
0 |
12 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
|
8 |
12 |
0 |
11 |
1 |
|
24 |
12 |
0 |
10 |
2 |
|
48 |
10 |
2 |
11 |
1 |
|
72 |
9 |
3 |
11 |
1 |
Day |
4 |
11 |
1 |
10 |
2 |
|
5 |
11 |
1 |
10 |
2 |
|
6 |
11 |
1 |
10 |
2 |
|
7 |
9 |
3 |
10 |
2 |
|
8 |
10 |
2 |
10 |
2 |
|
9 |
9 |
3 |
10 |
2 |
|
10 |
9 |
3 |
10 |
2 |
*Patients who completed the study early
having achieved hemostasis counted as effective at subsequent time-points,
and patients who discontinued due to treatment failure counted as ineffective
at subsequent time-points. Eight patients completed the study early because
their bleeding had resolved and they were discharged from the hospital.
Four patients dropped out of the study due to ineffective therapy and
1 patient left the study due to a hemarthrosis that was described as an
adverse event. |
E: Number of patients where rFVIIa treatment was effective; I: Number of patients
where rFVIIa treatment was ineffective
Study D: Dosing by Treatment Group
|
Bolus Injection
90 μg/kg
(n = 12) |
Continuous Infusion
50 μg/kg/h
(n = 12) |
Days of dosing, median (range) |
10 (4-15)a |
10 (2-116) |
No.bolus injections, median (range) |
38 (36-42) |
1.5 (0-7) |
No.of additional bolus injections, median (range) |
0 (0-3) |
0 (0-4) |
Mean total dose,mg |
237.5 |
292.2 |
a Includes dosing during the follow-up
period after the 10-day study period |
Congenital Factor VII Deficiency
Data were collected from the published literature and internal sources for
70 patients with Factor VII deficiency treated with NovoSeven (coagulation factor viia (recombinant)) for 124 bleeding
episodes, surgeries, or prophylaxis regimens. Thirty-two of these patients were
enrolled in emergency and compassionate use trials conducted by Novo Nordisk
(43 non-surgical bleeding episodes, 26 surgeries); 35 were reported in the published
literature (20 surgeries, 10non-surgical bleeding episodes, 4 cases of caesarean
section or vaginal birth, and 10 cases of long-term prophylaxis, and 1 case
of on-demand therapy); and 3 were from a registry maintained by the Hemophilia
and Thrombosis Research Society (9 bleeding episodes, 1 surgery). Dosing ranged
from 6-98 μg/kg administered every 2-12 hours (except for prophylaxis, where
doses were administered from 2 times per day up to 2 times per week). Patients
were treated with an average of 1-10 doses. Treatment was effective (bleeding
stopped or treatment was rated as effective by the physician) in 93% of episodes
(90% for trial patients, 98% for published patients, 90% for HTRS registry patients).
Acquired Hemophilia
Data were collected from four studies in the compassionate use program conducted
by Novo Nordisk and the Hemophila and Thrombosis Research Society (HTRS) registry.
A total of 70 patients with acquired hemophilia were treated with NovoSeven (coagulation factor viia (recombinant))
for 113 bleeding episodes, surgeries, or traumatic injuries. Sixty-one of these
patients were from the compassionate use program with 100 bleeding episodes
(68 non-surgical and 32 surgical bleeding episodes) and 9 patients were from
the HTRS registry with 13 bleeding episodes (8 non-surgical, 3 surgical and
2 episodes classified as other). Concomitant use of other hemostatic agents
occurred in 29/70 (41%); 13 (19%) received more than one hemostatic agent. The
most common hemostatic agents used were antifibrinolytics, Factor VIII and activated
prothrombin complex concentrates.
The compassionate use programs and the HTRS registry were not designed to select
doses or compare first-line efficacy or efficacy when used after failure of
other hemostatic agents (salvage treatment). A dose response was not seen in
doses ranging from 70-90 μg/kg.
The mean dose of rFVIIa administered was 90 μg/kg (range: 31 to 197 μg/kg);
the mean number of injections per day was 6 (range: 1 to 10 injections per day).
Overall efficacy i. e. , effective and partially effective outcomes, was 87/112
(78%);with 77/100 (77%) efficacy in the compassionate use programs and 10/12
(83%) efficacy in the HTRS registry. In the compassionate use programs, overall
efficacy for the first-line treatment was 38/44 (86%) compared to 39/56 (70%)
when used as salvage treatment.
Efficacy by Dose Group, for Patients Receiving Doses Ranging
from < 61 to > 90 μg/kg rFVIIa, Compassionate Use Programs and HTRS Registry
|
rFVIIa Dose (μg/kg) |
Outcomea |
Unknown |
< 61 |
61-69 |
70-80 |
81-89 |
90 |
> 90 |
Total |
Effective N (%) |
1 (33) |
3 (75) |
5 (63) |
10 (63) |
12 (57) |
10 (67) |
26 (58) |
67 |
Partial N (%) |
1 (33) |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
3 (19) |
3 (14) |
2 (13) |
11 (24) |
20 |
Ineffective N (%) |
0 (0) |
1 (25) |
3 (38) |
2 (13) |
2 (10) |
2 (13) |
7 (16) |
17 |
Unknown N (%) |
1 (33) |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
1 (6) |
4 (19) |
1 (7) |
1 (2) |
8 |
No.of Bleeding Episodesc |
3 |
4 |
8 |
16 |
21 |
15 |
45 |
112b |
a Outcome assessed at end of
treatment, last observation carried forward
b One patient in the HTRS registry was excluded from efficacy
analysis since rFVIIa was used to maintain hemostasis after bleeding had
been controlled.
c N (%) do not add up to 100 due to rounding. |
REFERENCES
2. Butenas, S. , et al. : Mechanism of factor VIIa-dependent
coagulation in hemophilia blood, Blood 2002; 99: 923-930. Figure A Copyright
American Society of Hematology, used with permission.
3. Allen, G. A. , et al. : The effect of factor X level
on thrombin generation and the procoagulant effect of activated factor VII in
a cell-based model of coagulation, Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis 2000;11
(suppl 1): 3-7.
4. Lindley, C. M. , et al. : Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
of recombinant Factor VIIa, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics 1994;
55 (6): 638-648.
5. Bauer, K. A. : Treatment of Factor VII deficiency
with recombinant Factor VIIa, Haemostasis 1996; 26 (suppl 1):155-158.
6. Lusher, J. , et al. :Clinical experience with recombinant
Factor VIIa, Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis 1998; 9: 119-128.
7. Bech, M. R. : Recombinant Factor VIIa in Joint and
Muscle Bleeding Episodes, Haemostasis 1996; 26 (suppl 1): 135-138.
8. Lusher, J. M. : Recombinant Factor VIIa (NovoSeven (coagulation factor viia (recombinant)) ®)
in the Treatment of Internal Bleeding in Patients with Factor VIII and IX Inhibitors,
Haemostasis 1996; 26 (suppl 1): 124-130.
9. Lusher, J. M. , et al. : A randomized, double-blind
comparison of two dosage levels of recombinant factor VIIa in the treatment
of joint, muscle and mucocutaneous haemorrhages in persons with hemophilia A
and B, with and without inhibitor, Haemophilia 1998; 4: 790-798.
10. Shapiro A. D. , et al: Prospective, Randomised Trial
of Two Doses of rFVIIa (NovoSeven (coagulation factor viia (recombinant)) ) in Haemophilia Patients with Inhibitors Undergoing
Surgery, Thrombosis and Haemostasis 1998; 80: 773-778.