Clinical Pharmacology for NexoBrid
Mechanism Of Action
The mixture of enzymes in NEXOBRID dissolves burn wound eschar. The specific components responsible for this effect have not been identified.
Pharmacodynamics
The pharmacodynamics of NEXOBRID are unknown.
Cardiac Electrophysiology
At the approved recommended dose, NEXOBRID did not prolong the QT interval in humans to any clinically relevant extent.
Pharmacokinetics
Absorption
For adults and pediatric subjects 4 years of age and older, NEXOBRID applied to deep partial and full thickness burn wounds is absorbed, with median serum Tmax of 4 hours (during the treatment application). Systemic exposure (i.e., AUC) of bromelain, a component of anacaulasebcdb is correlated with the size of the treated area and NEXOBRID dose, but not the depth of the burn wound. The systemic exposure in pediatric subjects was comparable to adults.
In adult subjects, Cmax and the dose-normalized Cmax values after the first and second application (mean dosing interval of 17 hours) are comparable and only slight accumulation (less than 2-fold difference) is seen in AUC0-4 and AUC0-4 dose-normalized levels after the second application, compared to the first application.
Elimination
A majority of adults and pediatric subjects had no quantifiable serum concentrations after 72 hours. The mean ± SD terminal half-life of bromelain, a component of anacaulase-bcdb, is 12 ± 4.4 hours.
Drug Interaction Studies
Effect Of NEXOBRID On Other Drugs
Bromelain, a component of anacaulase-bcdb, exhibited CYP2C8 time-dependent inhibition in human hepatocytes and inhibited human microsomal CYP2C9. No clinical studies have been conducted to assess the potential for systemic drug interactions.
Immunogenicity
There is insufficient information to characterize the anti-drug antibody response to anacaulasebcdb and the effects of anti-drug antibodies on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, or effectiveness of NEXOBRID.
Clinical Studies
Adults
The efficacy of NEXOBRID for the eschar removal of deep partial thickness (DPT) and full thickness (FT) thermal burns has been investigated in two trials.
Study 1
NEXOBRID was investigated in the DETECT randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, three-arm trial, comparing NEXOBRID, standard of care (SOC), and gel vehicle treatment in subjects with DPT and/or FT thermal burns of 3 -30% BSA (Study 1, NCT02148705). SOC included both surgical and non-surgical methods for eschar removal per the investigators' discretion. Subjects on the NEXOBRID and gel vehicle arms who had eschar remaining following the topical treatment period were treated with SOC. NEXOBRID was compared to gel vehicle for the incidence of ≥95% eschar removal at the end of the topical treatment period. NEXOBRID was also compared with SOC for the incidence of surgical eschar removal (tangential, minor, avulsion, Versajet and/or dermabrasion excision) and time to eschar removal.
A total of 175 subjects were randomized in a 3:3:1 ratio (NEXOBRID : SOC : gel vehicle) and 169 subjects were treated. The mean age was 41 years, 70% of subjects were male and 30% were female, and 81% were White, 14% were Black or African American, 5% were other races, and 1% were Asian. Seventeen percent of subjects were Hispanic or Latino. Subjects had one or more target wounds (TWs) to be treated for eschar removal. The mean percentage BSA of all TWs per subject was 6.1%. The majority of subjects (82%) had one to two TWs.
The incidence of ≥95% eschar removal at the end of the topical treatment period for subjects in the NEXOBRID and gel vehicle groups is shown in Table 3.
Table 3: Incidence of ≥95% Eschar Removal at the End of the Topical Treatment Period in NEXOBRID-or Gel Vehicle-Treated Subjects (Study 1; DETECT)
NEXOBRID
(N=75) |
Gel Vehicle
(N=25) |
Treatment Difference
(95% Confidence Interval) |
93%
(70/75) |
4%
(1/25) |
89%
(74%, 96%) |
The incidence of surgical eschar removal (tangential, minor, avulsion, Versajet and/or dermabrasion excision) and time to ≥95% eschar removal for the NEXOBRID and SOC groups are shown in Table 4.
Table 4: Incidence of Excision for Eschar Removal in NEXOBRID-or SOC-Treated Subjects (Study 1; DETECT)
NEXOBRID
(N=75) |
SOC
(N=75) |
Treatment Difference
(95% Confidence Interval) |
4%
(3/75) |
72%
(54/75) |
-68%
(-78%, -56%) |
| SOC = standard of care |
The median time to eschar removal was 1 day on the NEXOBRID arm and 3.8 days on the SOC arm.
The estimated median time to ≥95% wound closure for all TWs on a subject was 31 days for the NEXOBRID arm and 36 days for the SOC treatment arm. Subjects were not evaluated frequently enough after achieving ≥95% wound closure to adequately assess time to 100% wound closure.
Study 2
NEXOBRID was investigated in a multicenter, open-label, randomized, two-arm trial, comparing NEXOBRID to SOC treatment in subjects with DPT and/or FT thermal burns of 5 -24% BSA (Study 2; NCT00324311). SOC included both surgical and non-surgical methods for eschar removal per the investigators' discretion. The trial enrolled 182 subjects. The first subject at each site (26 subjects) was not randomized and was treated with NEXOBRID. The remaining 156 subjects were randomized to NEXOBRID or SOC. The efficacy assessments were analyzed on DPT burns only.
Demographics were similar across both arms. The mean age was 29.9 years. Approximately 80% of the study subjects were adults (≥18 years), 74% were male and 26% were female, 82% were White, 7% were other races, 6% were Black, and 5% were Asian.
The incidence of surgical eschar removal (tangential, minor, avulsion, Versajet and/or dermabrasion excision) for the NEXOBRID and SOC groups is shown in Table 5.
Table 5: Incidence of Excision of Eschar Removal of Deep Partial Thickness Wounds in Patients with Thermal Burns (Study 2)
|
NEXOBRID
N=106 Wounds in 49 Subjectsa |
SOC
N=88 Wounds in 48 Subjectsa |
Treatment Difference
(95% Confidence Interval) |
Incidence of excision for eschar removal
(per wound)b |
15%
16/106 wounds |
63%
55/88 wounds |
-47%
(-59%, -34%) |
Incidence of excision for eschar removal
(per subject)b,c |
22%
11/49 subjects |
77%
37/48 subjects |
-55%
(-71%, -38%) |
SOC = standard of care
a Analysis population includes only patients with at least one wound that was entirely DPT
b Surgical eschar removal procedures include (tangential, minor, avulsion, Versajet and/or dermabrasion excision)
c Assessement per subject was an exploratory analysis |
In randomized subjects, the estimated median time to ≥95% wound closure was 33 days for the NEXOBRID arm and 24 days for the SOC treatment arm. Subjects were not evaluated frequently enough after achieving ≥95% wound closure to adequately assess time to 100% wound closure.
Pediatric Subjects
Study 3
NEXOBRID was investigated in the CIDS study which was an open label, randomized, controlled, two arm trial comparing NEXOBRID and standard of care (SOC) treatment in subjects 7 months to 18 years of age with DPT and/or FT thermal burns of ≥1% -30% BSA (Study 3, NCT02278718). SOC included both surgical and nonsurgical methods for eschar removal per the investigator's discretion. Subjects on the NEXOBRID arm who had eschar remaining following the topical treatment period were treated with SOC. NEXOBRID was compared with SOC for the time to eschar removal and for the incidence of surgical eschar removal (tangential, minor, avulsion, Versajet and/or dermabrasion excision).
A total of 145 subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio (NEXOBRID:SOC) and 139 subjects were treated. The mean age was approximately 6 years, with a median of 3.4 years in the NEXOBRID group and 3.9 years in the SOC group. In the trial, 62% were male, 70% were White, 23% were Asian, 4% were Black or African American, and 3% were other races; for ethnicity, 7% identified as Hispanic or Latino. Subjects had one or more target wounds (TWs) to be treated for eschar removal. The mean percentage BSA of all TWs per subject was 5.6%. The majority of subjects in both treatment groups had 1 TW (71.0% for NEXOBRID and 80.0% for SOC).
The median time to ≥95% eschar removal is shown in Table 6.
Table 6: Time to ≥95% Eschar Removal, Estimated Median Time for NEXOBRID vs SOC in Pediatric Subjects (Study 3; CIDS)
|
NEXOBRID |
SOC |
| (N=72) |
(N=73) |
| Median (Days) |
0.99 |
5.99 |
| 95% Confidence Interval |
(0.88, 1.04) |
(2.71, 9.84) |
The incidence of surgical eschar removal (tangential, minor, avulsion, Versajet and/or dermabrasion excision) is shown in Table 7.
Table 7: Incidence of Surgical Excision for Eschar Removal for NEXOBRID vs SOC in Pediatric Subjects (Study 3; CIDS)
NEXOBRID
(N=72) |
SOC
(N=73) |
Treatment Difference
(95% Confidence Interval) |
8%
(6/72) |
64%
(47/73) |
-56%
(-68%, -42%) |
The estimated median time to ≥95% wound closure for all target wounds on a subject was 32 days for the NEXOBRID arm and 34 days for the SOC treatment arm. The estimated median time reach 100% wound closure on a target wound level was 44 days for NexoBrid arm and 43 days for the SOC arm.