CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism Of Action
Lusutrombopag is an orally
bioavailable, small molecule TPO receptor agonist that interacts with the
transmembrane domain of human TPO receptors expressed on megakaryocytes to
induce the proliferation and differentiation of megakaryocytic progenitor cells
from hematopoietic stem cells and megakaryocyte maturation.
Pharmacodynamics
Platelet Response
Lusutrombopag upregulates the production of platelets
through its agonistic effect on human TPO receptors. The effect of
lusutrombopag on platelet count increase was correlated with the AUC across the
studied dose range of 0.25 mg to 4 mg in thrombocytopenic patients with chronic
liver disease. With the 3 mg daily dose, the mean (standard deviation) maximum
platelet count in patients (N=74) without platelet transfusion was 86.9 (27.2)
x 109/L, and the median time to reach the maximum platelet count was 12.0 (5 to
35) days.
Cardiac Electrophysiology
At a dose 8 times the recommended dosage, MULPLETA does
not prolong QT interval to any clinically relevant extent.
Pharmacokinetics
Lusutrombopag demonstrated dose-proportional
pharmacokinetics after single doses ranging from 1 mg (0.33 times the lowest
approved dosage) to 50 mg (16.7 times the highest recommended dosage). Healthy
subjects administered 3 mg of lusutrombopag had a geometric mean (%CV) maximal
concentration (Cmax) of 111 (20.4) ng/mL and area under the time-concentration
curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-inf) of 2931 (23.4) ng.hr/mL. The
pharmacokinetics of lusutrombopag were similar in both healthy subjects and the
chronic liver disease population.
The accumulation ratios of Cmax and AUC were
approximately 2 with once-daily multiple-dose administration, and
steady-state plasma lusutrombopag concentrations were achieved after Day
5.
Absorption
In patients with chronic liver disease, the time to peak
lusutrombopag concentration (Tmax) was observed 6 to 8 hours after oral
administration.
Food Effect
Lusutrombopag AUC and Cmax were not affected when
MULPLETA was co-administered with a high-fat meal (a total of
approximately 900 calories, with 500, 250, and 150 calories from fat,
carbohydrate, and protein, respectively).
Distribution
The mean (%CV) lusutrombopag apparent volume of
distribution in healthy adult subjects was 39.5 (23.5) L. The plasma protein
binding of lusutrombopag is more than 99.9%.
Elimination
The terminal elimination half-life (t½) in
healthy adult subjects was approximately 27 hours. The mean (%CV) clearance of
lusutrombopag in patients with chronic liver disease is estimated to be 1.1
(36.1) L/hr.
Metabolism
Lusutrombopag is primarily metabolized by CYP4 enzymes,
including CYP4A11.
Excretion
Fecal excretion accounted for 83% of the administered
dose, with 16% of the dose excreted as unchanged lusutrombopag, and urinary
excretion accounted for approximately 1%.
Specific Populations
No clinically significant differences in the
pharmacokinetics of lusutrombopag were observed based on age or race/ethnicity.
Though lusutrombopag exposure tends to decrease with increasing body weight,
differences in exposure are not considered clinically relevant.
Patients With Renal Impairment
A population pharmacokinetic analysis did not find a
clinically meaningful effect of mild (creatinine clearance (CLcr) 60 to less
than 90 mL/min) and moderate (CLcr 30 to less than 60 mL/min) renal impairment
on the pharmacokinetics of lusutrombopag. Data in patients with severe renal
impairment (CLcr less than 30 mL/min) are limited.
Patients With Hepatic Impairment
No clinically significant differences in the
pharmacokinetics of lusutrombopag were observed based on mild to moderate
(Child-Pugh class A and B) hepatic impairment.
The mean observed lusutrombopag Cmax and AUC0-τ
decreased by 20% to 30% in patients (N=5) with severe (Child-Pugh class
C) hepatic impairment compared to patients with Child-Pugh class A and
class B liver disease. However, the ranges for Cmax and AUC0-τ overlapped
among patients with Child-Pugh class A, B, and C liver disease.
Drug Interaction Studies
Clinical Studies
No clinically significant changes in lusutrombopag
exposure were observed when co-administered with cyclosporine (an
inhibitor of P-gp and BCRP) or an antacid containing a multivalent cation
(calcium carbonate).
No clinically significant changes in midazolam (a CYP3A
substrate) exposure were observed when co-administered with
lusutrombopag.
In Vitro Studies
CYP Enzymes: lusutrombopag has low potential to inhibit
CYP enzymes (CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and
CYP3A4/5). Lusutrombopag did not induce CYP1A2, CYP2C9, or CYP3A4.
UGT Enzymes: lusutrombopag did not induce UGT1A2, UGT1A6,
or UGT2B7.
Transporter Systems: lusutrombopag is a substrate of P-gp
and BCRP. Lusutrombopag has low potential to inhibit P-gp, BCRP, OATP1B1,
OATP1B3, OCT1, OCT2, OAT1, OAT3, MATE1, MATE2-K, and BSEP.
Clinical Studies
The efficacy of MULPLETA for the treatment of
thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic liver disease who are scheduled to
undergo a procedure was evaluated in 2 randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled trials (L-PLUS 1 (N=97) and L-PLUS 2
(N=215; NCT02389621)). Patients with chronic liver disease who were undergoing
an invasive procedure and had a platelet count less than 50 x 109/L were
eligible to participate. Patients undergoing laparotomy, thoracotomy,
open-heart surgery, craniotomy, or organ resection were excluded.
Patients with a history of splenectomy, partial splenic embolization, or
thrombosis and those with Child-Pugh class C liver disease, absence of
hepatopetal blood flow, or a prothrombotic condition other than chronic liver
disease were not allowed to participate.
The patient populations were similar between the MULPLETA
and placebo arms and consisted of 60% male and 40% female; median age was 60
years (range 19-88). The racial and ethnic distribution was White (55%),
Asian (41%), and Other (4%).
Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 3 mg of MULPLETA
or placebo once daily for up to 7 days. Randomization was stratified by liver
ablation/coagulation or other procedures and the platelet count at
screening/baseline. In L-PLUS 1, 57% of patients underwent procedures
other than liver ablation/coagulation and 43% underwent liver
ablation/coagulation (RFA/MCT). In L-PLUS 2, 98% of patients underwent
procedures other than liver ablation/coagulation and 2% underwent liver
ablation/coagulation (RFA/MCT). Procedures other than liver ablation/coagulation
(RFA/MCT) included liver-related procedures (transcatheter arterial
chemoembolization, liver biopsy, and others), upper and lower gastrointestinal
endoscopy-related procedures (endoscopic variceal ligation, endoscopic
injection sclerotherapy, polypectomy, and biopsy), and other procedures (dental
extraction, diagnostic paracentesis or laparocentesis, septoplasty,
embolization of splenic artery aneurysm, bone marrow biopsy, removal of
cervical polyp, and inguinal hernia repair (non-laparotomy based)).
In L-PLUS 1, the major efficacy outcome was the
proportion of patients who require no platelet transfusion prior to the primary
invasive procedure. In L-PLUS 2, the major efficacy outcome was the
proportion of patients who require no platelet transfusion prior to the primary
invasive procedure and no rescue therapy for bleeding (i.e., platelet
preparations, other blood preparations, including red blood cells and plasma,
volume expanders) from randomization through 7 days after the primary invasive
procedure. In both trials, additional efficacy outcomes included the proportion
of patients who require no platelet transfusion during the study, proportion of
responders, duration of the increase in platelet count defined as the number of
days during which the platelet count was maintained as ≥50 x 109/L, and
the time course of platelet counts.
In both the L-PLUS 1 and L-PLUS 2 trials,
responders were defined as patients who had a platelet count of ≥50 x 109/L
with an increase of ≥20 x 109/L from baseline.
Table 2: L-PLUS 1 Trial: Proportion of Patients
Not Requiring Platelet Transfusion Prior to Invasive Procedure and Proportion
of Responders
Endpoint |
Proportion (n/N) Exact 95% Confidence Interval |
Treatment Difference (95% Confidence Interval) p value |
MULPLETA
(N=49) |
Placebo
(N=48) |
Not requiring platelet transfusion prior to invasive procedure* |
78% (38/49) |
13% (6/48) |
64 (49, 79) |
(63, 88) |
(4.7, 25) |
<0.0001§ |
Responder‡ during study |
76% (37/49) |
6% (3/48) |
68 (54, 82) |
(61, 87) |
(1.3, 17) |
<0.0001§ |
*A platelet transfusion was required if the platelet
count was less than 50 x 109/L.
§Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
test with baseline platelet count as stratum; p value and confidence interval
calculated using Wald method.
‡Platelet count reached at least 50 x
109/L and increased at least 20 x 109/L from baseline. |
Table 3: L-PLUS 2 Trial: Proportion of Patients Not Requiring Platelet Transfusion Prior to
Invasive Procedure or Rescue Therapy for Bleeding Through 7 Days After Invasive
Procedure and Proportion of Responders
Endpoint |
Proportion (n/N) Exact 95% Confidence Interval |
Treatment Difference (95% Confidence Interval) p value |
MULPLETA
(N=108) |
Placebo
(N=107) |
Not requiring platelet transfusion prior to invasive procedure* or rescue therapy for bleeding from randomization through 7 days after invasive procedure |
65% (70/108) |
29% (31/107) |
37 (25, 49) |
(55, 74) |
(21, 39) |
<0.0001§ |
Responder‡ during study |
65% (70/108) |
13% (14/107) |
52 (41, 62) |
(55, 74) |
(7.3, 21) |
<0.0001§ |
*A platelet transfusion was required if the platelet
count was less than 50 x 109/L.
§Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test with baseline platelet count as
stratum; p value and confidence interval calculated using Wald method.
‡Platelet count reached at least 50 x 109/L and increased at least
20 x 109/L from baseline. |
The median (Q1, Q3) duration of platelet count increase
to at least 50 x 109/L was 22 (17, 27) days in MULPLETA-treated
patients without platelet transfusion and 1.8 (0.0, 8.3) days in placebo-treated
patients with platelet transfusion in L-PLUS 1 and 19 (13, 28) days in
MULPLETA-treated patients without platelet transfusion and 0.0 (0.0, 5.0)
days in placebo-treated patients with platelet transfusion in
L-PLUS 2.