CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism Of Action
Several investigators have reported on the appetite
enhancing property of megestrol acetate and its possible use in cachexia. The
precise mechanism by which megestrol acetate produces effects in anorexia and
cachexia is unknown at the present time.
Pharmacokinetics
Absorption And Distribution
Mean plasma concentrations of megestrol acetate after administration
of 625 mg (125 mg/mL) of Megace® ES oral suspension are equivalent under fed
conditions to 800 mg (40 mg/mL) of megestrol acetate oral suspension in healthy
volunteers.
In order to characterize the dose proportionality of
Megace® ES, pharmacokinetic studies across a range of doses were conducted when
administered under fasting and fed conditions.
Pharmacokinetics of megestrol acetate was linear in the
dosing range between 150 mg and 675 mg after Megace® ES administration
regardless of meal condition. The mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and the
mean area under the concentration time-curve (AUC) after a high fat meal were
increased by 48% and 36%, respectively, compared to those under the fasting condition
after 625 mg Megace® ES administration. This food effect is less than that seen
for the original formulation, megestrol acetate 800 mg/20 mL, where a high fat
meal significantly increased AUC and Cmax of megestrol acetate to 2-fold and
7-fold, respectively, compared to those under the fasting condition. There was
no difference in safety following administration in the fed state, therefore
Megace® ES could be taken without regard to meals.
Plasma steady state pharmacokinetics of megestrol acetate
was evaluated in 10 adult, cachectic male adult patients with acquired
immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and an involuntary weight loss greater than
10% of baseline who received single oral doses of 800 mg/day of megestrol acetate
oral suspension for 21 days. The Mean (±1SD) Cmax of megestrol acetate was 753
(±539) ng/mL. The mean AUC was 10476 (±7788) ng x hr/mL. Median Tmax value was
five hours.
In another study, 24 asymptomatic HIV seropositive male
adult subjects were dosed once daily with 750 mg of megestrol acetate oral
suspension for 14 days. Mean Cmax and AUC values were 490 (±238) ng/mL and 6779
(±3048) hr x ng/mL, respectively. The median Tmax value was three hours. The
mean Cmjn value was 202 (±101) ng/mL. The mean % of fluctuation value was 107 (±40).
Metabolism And Excretion
The major route of drug elimination in humans is urine.
When radio-labeled megestrol acetate was administered to humans in doses of 4
to 90 mg, the urinary excretion within 10 days ranged from 56.5% to 78.4% (mean
66.4%) and fecal excretion ranged from 7.7% to 30.3% (mean 19.8%). The total
recovered radioactivity varied between 83.1% and 94.7% (mean 86.2%).
Megestrol acetate metabolites which were identified in
urine constituted 5% to 8% of the dose administered. Respiratory excretion as
labeled carbon dioxide and fat storage may have accounted for at least part of
the radioactivity not found in urine and feces.
The mean elimination half-life of megestrol ranged from
20 to 50 hours in healthy subjects.
Specific Populations
The pharmacokinetics of megestrol acetate has not been
studied in specific population, for example, pediatric, renal impairment, and
hepatic impairment.
Drug Interactions
The effects of indinavir, zidovudine or rifabutin on the
pharmacokinetics of megestrol acetate were not studied.
Zidovudine
Pharmacokinetic studies show that there are no
significant alterations in exposure of zidovudine when megestrol acetate is
administered with this drug.
Rifabutin
Pharmacokinetic studies show that there are no
significant alterations in exposure of rifabutin when megestrol acetate is
administered with this drug.
Indinavir
A pharmacokinetic study in healthy male subjects
demonstrated that coadministration of megestrol acetate (675 mg for 14 days) and
indinavir (single dose 800 mg) results in a significant decrease in the
pharmacokinetic parameters (~32% for Cmax and ~21% for AUC) of indinavir.
Animal Pharmacology And/Or Toxicology
Long-term treatment with Megace® ES may increase the risk
of respiratory infections. A trend toward increased frequency of respiratory
infections, decreased lymphocyte counts and increased neutrophil counts was
observed in a two-year chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity study of megestrol acetate
conducted in rats.
Clinical Studies
The efficacy of Megace® ES (megestrol acetate oral
suspension, 125 mg/mL) was based on two trials of megestrol acetate oral
suspension (40 mg/mL). These two trials are described below.
Trial 1
One was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled study comparing megestrol acetate (MA) at doses of 100 mg,
400 mg, and 800 mg per day versus placebo in AIDS patients with
anorexia/cachexia and significant weight loss. Of the 270 patients entered on
study, 195 met all inclusion/exclusion criteria, had at least two additional
post baseline weight measurements over a 12 week period or had one post
baseline weight measurement but dropped out for therapeutic failure. The
percent of patients gaining 2.3 kg or more at maximum weight gain in 12 study
weeks was statistically significantly greater for the 800 mg (64%) and 400 mg
(57%) MAtreated groups than for the placebo group (24%). Mean weight increased
from baseline to last evaluation in 12 study weeks in the 800 mg MA-treated
group by 3.5 kg, the 400 mg MA group by 1.9 kg, the 100 mg MA group by 0.9 kg
and decreased in the placebo group by 0.7 kg. Mean weight changes at 4, 8 and
12 weeks for patients evaluable for efficacy in the two clinical trials is shown
graphically. Changes in body composition during the 12 study weeks as measured
by bioelectrical impedance analysis showed increases in non-water body weight
in the MA-treated groups. In addition, edema developed or worsened in only 3
patients.
Greater percentages of MA-treated patients in the 800 mg
group (89%), the 400 mg group (68%) and the 100 mg group (72%), than in the
placebo group (50%), showed an improvement in appetite at last evaluation
during the 12 study weeks. A statistically significant difference was observed between
the 800 mg MA-treated group and the placebo group in the change in caloric
intake from baseline to time of maximum weight change. Patients were asked to
assess weight change, appetite, appearance, and overall perception of well-being
in a 9 question survey. At maximum weight change only the 800 mg MA-treated
group gave responses that w ere statistically significantly more favorable to
all questions when compared to the placebo-treated group. A dose response was
noted in the survey with positive responses correlating with higher dose for
all questions.
Trial 2
The second trial was a multicenter, randomized,
double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing megestrol acetate 800 mg/day
versus placebo in AIDS patients with anorexia/cachexia and significant weight
loss. Of the 100 patients entered on study, 65 met all inclusion/exclusion criteria,
had at least two additional post baseline weight measurements over a 12 week
period or had one post baseline weight measurement but dropped out for
therapeutic failure. Patients in the 800 mg MA-treated group had a
statistically significantly larger increase in mean maximum weight change than
patients in the placebo group. From baseline to study week 12, mean weight increased
by 5.1 kg in the MA-treated group and decreased 1.0 kg in the placebo group.
Changes in body composition as measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis
showed increases in nonwater weight in the MA-treated group (see Clinical
Studies table). No edema was reported in the MA-treated group. A greater
percentage of MA-treated patients (67%) than placebo-treated patients (38%)
showed an improvement in appetite at last evaluation during the 12 study weeks;
this difference was statistically significant. There were no statistically
significant differences between treatment groups in mean caloric change or in
daily caloric intake at time to maximum weight change. In the same 9 question
survey referenced in the first trial, patients' assessments of weight change,
appetite, appearance, and overall perception of well-being showed increases in mean
scores in MA-treated patients as compared to the placebo group.
In both trials, patients tolerated the drug well and no
statistically significant differences were seen between the treatment groups
with regard to laboratory abnormalities, new opportunistic infections,
lymphocyte counts, T4 counts, T8 counts, or skin reactivity tests [see ADVERSE
REACTIONS].
Table 2: Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Clinical
Efficacy Trials
Megestrol Acetate Oral Suspension Clinical Efficacy Trials |
|
Trial 1 - Study Accrual Dates 11/88 to 12/90 |
Trial 2 - Study Accrual Dates 5/89 to 4/91 |
Megestrol Acetate, mg/day |
0 |
100 |
400 |
800 |
0 |
800 |
Entered Patients |
38 |
82 |
75 |
75 |
48 |
52 |
Evaluable Patients |
28 |
61 |
53 |
53 |
29 |
36 |
Mean Change in Weight (kg) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baseline to 12 Weeks |
0.0 |
1.3 |
4.2 |
4.9 |
-1.0 |
5.1 |
% Patients ≥ 2.3 kg Gain at Last Evaluation in 12 Weeks |
21 |
44 |
57 |
64 |
28 |
47 |
Mean Changes in Body Composition*: |
Fat Body Mass (kg) |
0.0 |
1.0 |
1.3 |
2.5 |
0.7 |
2.6 |
Lean Body Mass (kg) |
-0.8 |
-0.1 |
0.7 |
1.1 |
-0.7 |
-0.3 |
Water (liters) |
-1.3 |
-0.3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
-0.1 |
-0.1 |
% Patients With Improved Appetite: |
At Time of Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weight Change |
50 |
72 |
72 |
93 |
48 |
69 |
At Last Evaluation in 12 Weeks |
50 |
72 |
68 |
89 |
38 |
67 |
Mean Change in Daily Caloric Intake: |
Baseline to Time of Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weight Change |
-107 |
326 |
308 |
646 |
30 |
464 |
*Based on bioelectrical impedance analysis determinations
at last evaluation in 12 weeks. |
Figure 2: Mean Weight Change for Patients Evaluable
for Efficacy in Trial 1
Figure 3: Mean Weight Change for Patients Evaluable
for Efficacy in Trial 2