CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Measles, mumps, and rubella are three common childhood
diseases, caused by measles virus, mumps virus (paramyxoviruses), and rubella
virus (togavirus), respectively, that may be associated with serious complications
and/or death. For example, pneumonia and encephalitis are caused by measles.
Mumps is associated with aseptic meningitis, deafness and orchitis; and rubella
during pregnancy may cause congenital rubella syndrome in the infants of
infected mothers.
The impact of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination on
the natural history of each disease in the United States can be quantified by
comparing the maximum number of measles, mumps, and rubella cases reported in a
given year prior to vaccine use to the number of cases of each disease reported
in 1995. For measles, 894,134 cases reported in 1941 compared to 288 cases
reported in 1995 resulted in a 99.97% decrease in reported cases; for mumps,
152,209 cases reported in 1968 compared to 840 cases reported in 1995 resulted
in a 99.45% decrease in reported cases; and for rubella, 57,686 cases reported
in 1969 compared to 200 cases reported in 1995 resulted in a 99.65%
decrease.{3}
Clinical studies of 284 triple seronegative children, 11
months to 7 years of age, demonstrated that MM- R II is highly immunogenic and
generally well tolerated. In these studies, a single injection of the vaccine
induced measles hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) antibodies in 95%, mumps
neutralizing antibodies in 96%, and rubella HI antibodies in 99% of susceptible
persons. However, a small percentage (1-5%) of vaccinees may fail to
seroconvert after the primary dose (see also INDICATIONS AND USAGE, Recommended
Vaccination Schedule).
A study{4} of 6-month-old and 15-month-old infants born
to vaccine-immunized mothers demonstrated that, following vaccination with
ATTENUVAX, 74% of the 6-month-old infants developed detectable neutralizing
antibody (NT) titers while 100% of the 15-month-old infants developed NT. This
rate of seroconversion is higher than that previously reported for 6-month-old
infants born to naturally immune mothers tested by HI assay. When the
6-month-old infants of immunized mothers were revaccinated at 15 months, they
developed antibody titers equivalent to the 15-month-old vaccinees. The lower seroconversion
rate in 6-month-olds has two possible explanations: 1) Due to the limit of the
detection level of the assays (NT and enzyme immunoassay [EIA]), the presence
of trace amounts of undetectable maternal antibody might interfere with the
seroconversion of infants; or 2) The immune system of 6- month-olds is not
always capable of mounting a response to measles vaccine as measured by the two
antibody assays.
There is some evidence to suggest that infants who are
born to mothers who had wild-type measles and who are vaccinated at less than one
year of age may not develop sustained antibody levels when later revaccinated.
The advantage of early protection must be weighed against the chance for
failure to respond adequately on reimmunization.{5,6}
Efficacy of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines was
established in a series of double-blind controlled field trials which
demonstrated a high degree of protective efficacy afforded by the individual
vaccine components.{7-12} These studies also established that seroconversion in
response to vaccination against measles, mumps, and rubella paralleled
protection from these diseases.{13-15}
Following vaccination, antibodies associated with
protection can be measured by neutralization assays, HI, or ELISA (enzyme
linked immunosorbent assay) tests. Neutralizing and ELISA antibodies to measles,
mumps, and rubella viruses are still detectable in most individuals 11 to 13
years after primary vaccination.{16-18} See INDICATIONS AND USAGE, Non-Pregnant
Adolescent and Adult Females, for Rubella Susceptibility Testing.
The RA 27/3 rubella strain in M-M-R II elicits higher
immediate post-vaccination HI, complementfixing and neutralizing antibody
levels than other strains of rubella vaccine{19-25} and has been shown to
induce a broader profile of circulating antibodies including anti-theta and
anti-iota precipitating antibodies.{26,27} The RA 27/3 rubella strain
immunologically simulates natural infection more closely than other rubella
vaccine viruses.{27-29} The increased levels and broader profile of antibodies produced
by RA 27/3 strain rubella virus vaccine appear to correlate with greater
resistance to subclinical reinfection with the wild virus,{27,29-31} and
provide greater confidence for lasting immunity.
REFERENCES
3. Monthly Immunization Table, MMWR 45(1): 24-25, January
12, 1996.
4. Johnson, C.E.; et al: Measles Vaccine Immunogenicity
in 6- Versus 15-Month-Old Infants Born to Mothers in the Measles Vaccine Era,
Pediatrics, 93(6): 939-943, 1994.
5. Linneman, C.C.; et al: Measles Immunity After
Vaccination: Results in Children Vaccinated Before 10 Months of Age,
Pediatrics, 69(3): 332-335, March 1982.
6. Stetler, H.C.; et al: Impact of Revaccinating Children
Who Initially Received Measles Vaccine Before 10 Months of Age, Pediatrics 77(4):
471-476, April 1986.
7. Hilleman, M.R.; Buynak, E.B.; Weibel, R.E.; et al:
Development and Evaluation of the Moraten Measles Virus Vaccine, JAMA 206(3):
587-590, 1968.
8. Weibel, R.E.; Stokes, J.; Buynak, E.B.; et al: Live,
Attenuated Mumps Virus Vaccine 3. Clinical and Serologic Aspects in a Field
Evaluation, N. Engl. J. Med. 276: 245-251, 1967.
9. Hilleman, M.R.; Weibel, R.E.; Buynak, E.B.; et al:
Live, Attenuated Mumps Virus Vaccine 4. Protective Efficacy as Measured in a
Field Evaluation, N. Engl. J. Med. 276: 252-258, 1967.
10. Cutts, F.T.; Henderson, R.H.; Clements, C.J.; et al:
Principles of measles control, Bull WHO 69(1): 1-7, 1991.
11. Weibel, R.E.; Buynak, E.B.; Stokes, J.; et al:
Evaluation Of Live Attenuated Mumps Virus Vaccine, Strain Jeryl Lynn, First
International Conference on Vaccines Against Viral and Rickettsial Diseases of
Man, World Health Organization, No. 147, May 1967.
12. Leibhaber, H.; Ingalls, T.H.; LeBouvier, G.L.; et al:
Vaccination With RA 27/3 Rubella Vaccine, Am. J. Dis. Child. 123: 133-136,
February 1972.
13. Rosen, L.: Hemagglutination and
Hemagglutination-Inhibition with Measles Virus, Virology 13: 139-141, January
1961.
14. Brown, G.C.; et al: Fluorescent-Antibody Marker for
Vaccine-Induced Rubella Antibodies, Infection and Immunity 2(4): 360-363, 1970.
15. Buynak, E.B.; et al: Live Attenuated Mumps Virus
Vaccine 1. Vaccine Development, Proceedings of the Society for Experimental
Biology and Medicine, 123: 768-775, 1966.
16. Weibel, R.E.; Carlson, A.J.; Villarejos, V.M.;
Buynak, E.B.; McLean, A.A.; Hilleman, M.R.: Clinical and Laboratory Studies of
Combined Live Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Vaccines Using the RA 27/3 Rubella
Virus, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 165: 323-326, 1980.
17. Unpublished data from the files of Merck Research
Laboratories.
18. Watson, J.C.; Pearson, J.S.; Erdman, D.D.; et al: An
Evaluation of Measles Revaccination Among School-Entry Age Children, 31st
Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Abstract
#268, 143, 1991.
19. Fogel, A.; Moshkowitz, A.; Rannon, L.; Gerichter,
Ch.B.: Comparative trials of RA 27/3 and Cendehill rubella vaccines in adult
and adolescent females, Am. J. Epidemiol. 93: 392-393, 1971.
20. Andzhaparidze, O.G.; Desyatskova, R.G.; Chervonski,
G.I.; Pryanichnikova, L.V.: Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of live
attenuated rubella virus vaccines, Am. J. Epidemiol. 91: 527-530, 1970.
21. Freestone, D.S.; Reynolds, G.M.; McKinnon, J.A.;
Prydie, J.: Vaccination of schoolgirls against rubella. Assessment of
serological status and a comparative trial of Wistar RA 27/3 and Cendehill strain
live attenuated rubella vaccines in 13-year-old schoolgirls in Dudley, Br. J.
Prev. Soc. Med. 29: 258-261, 1975.
22. Grillner, L.; Hedstrom, C.E.; Bergstrom, H.;
Forssman, L.; Rigner, A.; Lycke, E.: Vaccination against rubella of newly
delivered women, Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 5: 237-241, 1973.
23. Grillner, L.: Neutralizing antibodies after rubella
vaccination of newly delivered women: a comparison between three vaccines,
Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 7: 169-172, 1975.
24. Wallace, R.B.; Isacson, P.: Comparative trial of
HPV-77, DE-5 and RA 27/3 live-attenuated rubella vaccines, Am. J. Dis. Child. 124:
536-538, 1972.
25. Lalla, M.; Vesikari, T.; Virolainen, M.: Lymphoblast
proliferation and humoral antibody response after rubella vaccination, Clin.
Exp. Immunol. 15: 193-202, 1973.
26. LeBouvier, G.L.; Plotkin, S.A.: Precipitin responses
to rubella vaccine RA 27/3, J. Infect. Dis. 123: 220-223, 1971.
27. Horstmann, D.M.: Rubella: The challenge of its
control, J. Infect. Dis. 123: 640-654, 1971.
28. Ogra, P.L.; Kerr-Grant, D.; Umana, G.; Dzierba, J.;
Weintraub, D.: Antibody response in serum and nasopharynx after naturally
acquired and vaccine-induced infection with rubella virus, N. Engl. J. Med. 285:
1333-1339, 1971.
29. Plotkin, S.A.; Farquhar, J.D.; Ogra, P.L.:
Immunologic properties of RA 27/3 rubella virus vaccine, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 225:
585-590, 1973.
30. Liebhaber, H.; Ingalls, T.H.; LeBouvier, G.L.;
Horstmann, D.M.: Vaccination with RA 27/3 rubella vaccine. Persistence of
immunity and resistance to challenge after two years, Am. J. Dis. Child. 123: 133-136,
1972.
31. Farquhar, J.D.: Follow-up on rubella vaccinations and
experience with subclinical reinfection, J. Pediatr. 81: 460-465, 1972.